अApnaFunda

SHAILY ENGINEERING PLASTICS LT (SHAILY)

Process Industries · Chemicals: Specialty · figures to Nov '26

Quality scoreHow the business itself ranks against its sector peers on profitability, 3-year growth and leverage. 50 is the middle of the sector.86 / 100
Profitability 95Growth 91Balance sheet 72
Momentum scoreHow strong the recent trend is: 3-month price change, 12-month improvement in earnings and the rise in FII + DII holding, among companies above ₹500 cr.75 / 100
Price 44Earnings 81FII/DII 99

Passes these screensQuality CompounderDebt-light & profitableConsistent compounders

Share price

Closing priceAdjusted for splits and bonus issues.

₹3,089.9 latest close · +6.5% over the last 90 sessions

₹2,750₹3,000₹3,250₹3,500Jul 3Jul 29Aug 24Sep 17Oct 14Nov 9 ₹2,750₹3,000₹3,250₹3,500Jul 3Sep 4Nov 9

₹3,089.9 month-end · +18.8% over 12 months

₹2,000₹2,500₹3,000Nov '25Jan '26Apr '26Jun '26Sep '26Nov '26 ₹2,000₹2,500₹3,000Nov '25May '26Nov '26

₹3,089.9 month-end · +878.9% over 3 years

₹1,000₹2,000₹3,000Nov '23Jun '24Jan '25Sep '25Apr '26Nov '26 ₹1,000₹2,000₹3,000Nov '23May '25Nov '26

₹3,089.9 month-end · +712.8% since Jun '22

₹0₹1,000₹2,000₹3,000Jun '22May '23Mar '24Feb '25Dec '25Nov '26 ₹0₹1,000₹2,000₹3,000Jun '22Sep '24Nov '26

52-week range ₹1770.90 to ₹3615.20 · 1-year volatility 48.0%

Was the rally earned?

+19%share price, 1 yearLower P/E held it back

Mostly yes, with a catch.

  • Per-share earnings added 45 points, but investors now pay less per rupee of profit (P/E 102.3x to 80.3x), which took 26 points back.
  • The share count barely moved.
Net profit growth: +45 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+45 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: −26 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−26 ptsP/E changeShare price: +19%+19%Share priceNet profit growth: +45 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+45ProfitP/E change: −26 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−26P/EShare price: +19%+19%Share price
Net profit growth+45 ptsNet profit rose about 51%, which lifts the price.
P/E change-26 ptsThe P/E fell from 102.3x to 80.3x, which lowers the price.
Share count change0 ptsShare count was little changed. More shares would count against the price.
+879%share price, 3 yearsEarnings-driven

Mostly yes.

  • Per-share earnings added 622 points to the rise, while the multiple moved less (P/E 41.2x to 80.3x).
  • The share count barely moved.
Net profit growth: +624 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+624 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: +257 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+257 ptsP/E changeShare count change: −2 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−2 ptsShare count changeShare price: +879%+879%Share priceNet profit growth: +624 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+624ProfitP/E change: +257 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+257P/EShare count change: −2 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−2SharesShare price: +879%+879%Share price
Net profit growth+624 ptsNet profit rose about 405%, which lifts the price.
P/E change+257 ptsThe P/E rose from 41.2x to 80.3x, which lifts the price.
Share count change-2 ptsShare count was little changed. More shares would count against the price.
What do "pts" mean?

"pts" are percentage points of the share price return. The parts add up to the total shown for each period. Because price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count, higher profit pushes the price up, a higher P/E pushes it up, and more shares push it down.

Example: if the price rose 34% and profit growth accounts for +58 pts while a lower P/E accounts for -24 pts, then 58 - 24 = 34. The +58 is not the profit growth rate itself: it is the part of the price move that profit growth explains.

Not shown for 5 years: earnings were negative at one end, or there is not enough history.

Net profit is trailing twelve months as reported with a 60-day lag.

Compare this with LINDE INDIA

How rough has the ride been?

Maximum drawdown-56.8%recovered 2024-02
1-year volatility48.0%annualised
Beta vs sector index0.953-year daily, correlation 0.32
Volume spikes1last 90 sessions, 5x the 50-day median

Drawdown from peak

0%−20%−40%2023202420252026−55.4% 0%−20%−40%2023202420252026−55.4%
Largest drawdowns

-56.8% (2022-04 peak to 2023-03 low, recovered 2024-02)

-33.7% (2025-11 peak to 2026-01 low, recovered 2026-05)

-27.7% (2025-03 peak to 2025-04 low, recovered 2025-05)

Most recent volume spikes

2026-09-21: 6x the 50-day median, price +3.7% that day

Beta is the slope of daily returns against a market-cap-weighted index of the sector's other listed companies, built from today's constituents (so it excludes companies no longer listed).

Is it expensive against its own past and its peers?

80.3xP/E todayWithin its usual range
Against its own history65th percentile
CheapestMedian 70.8xDearest

Usual range 39.0x to 95.5x since 2022-06.

Against Process Industries80.3x vs 18.1x
This company
80.3x
Sector median
18.1x

344% above the Process Industries median.

13.7x45.9x78.1x110.3xJun '22May '23Apr '24Mar '25Feb '26Nov '2613.7x45.9x78.1x110.3xJun '22Dec '23Jun '25Nov '26
P/E (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianProcess Industries median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/B (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianProcess Industries median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/S (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianProcess Industries median
How to read this

Shaded band: 10th to 90th percentile of the company's own P/E history; dotted line: its median; orange line: sector median (companies with a positive multiple, at least 5 in the sector).

Sector figures are built from today's listed companies, so they exclude companies that are no longer listed.

All terms explained in the glossary →

How Process Industries is valued

Where does it rank among Process Industries peers?

Each cell is the company's percentile rank among its Process Industries peers (non-financial companies) that month.
Darker is better-ranked.
Rows marked ↓ are inverted (lower debt, shorter cash cycle and a lower P/E rank higher).

Where it ranks today

  • ROCE94th▲ 13 pts vs a year ago
  • Op. margin96thflat vs a year ago
  • Revenue growth77th▼ 8 pts vs a year ago
  • EPS growth77th▼ 12 pts vs a year ago
  • Debt/equity ↓61st▲ 8 pts vs a year ago
  • Cash cycle ↓39th▼ 5 pts vs a year ago
  • P/E ↓8thflat vs a year ago
  • 12M momentum79th▼ 19 pts vs a year ago

Rank history

ROCE
Op. margin
Revenue growth
EPS growth
Debt/equity ↓
Cash cycle ↓
P/E ↓
12M momentum
Dec '21Jul '22Jan '23Jul '23Jan '24Jul '24Jan '25Jul '25Jan '26Jul '26Nov '26
Lower rank Higher rank Not enough data

Percentiles use today's listed companies in the sector and need at least 5 peers with a value; grey cells have too few.
ROE is computed from net profit and book value where the source does not report it.

The Process Industries sector page Watch it move against Process Industries in the Observatory

What is the price implying?

~43%annual earnings growth implied by the price

At a P/E of 181.3x, the price would imply about 43.4%/yr earnings growth for 10 years under the same assumptions, but it is not ranked.

Fewer than six years of annual earnings are available, which is too little to measure delivered growth.

“Implied growth” is what the current price would require under our stated assumptions, not what we expect.

What prices imply across Process Industries The market-wide Expectations lists

Key figures

Share Priceclose 9 Nov
₹3089.90
P/E
80.3x
ROCE
29.0%
Market Cap
₹14212 cr
Revenue (TTM)
₹1025 cr
P/S
13.9x
P/B
19.8x
ROE
24.7%
Operating Margin
30.0%
Debt / Equity
0.2x
Promoter Holding
41.1%
12M Momentum
18.8%

52-week range

₹1770.90₹3615.20
72% of the way from its 52-week low to its high

Price risk

1Y volatility
48.0%
Beta vs sector
1-year daily
0.73

Balance sheet & cash

Interest cover
operating profit ÷ interest
16.5x
Cash from profit, 3Y
operating cash flow ÷ net profit
1.34x
Share count, 1Y
unchanged

Are profits backed by cash?

6 of 7checks within range1 near a threshold
Other income reliance3%Within range

Other income as a share of pre-tax profit (trailing twelve months): 2.6%. Bands: below 15%, 15% to 35%, above 35%.

Tax rate23%Within range

Median quarterly effective tax rate over about 2.5 years: 23.0%. Bands: 15% to 35%, 5% to 15% or 35% to 50%, outside 5% to 50%.

Cash conversion1.34xWithin range

Operating cash flow divided by net profit over the last three fiscal years: 1.34x (cash from operations ₹428 cr, net profit ₹320 cr). Bands: 0.8x and above, 0.5x to 0.8x, below 0.5x.

Free cash flow2 of 5 yrsNear threshold

Fiscal years with positive free cash flow in the last 5: 2. Bands: at least 80% of years, 40% to 80%, below 40%.

Receivable days vs history+12 daysWithin range

Debtor days are above the median of the previous three fiscal years by 12 days (79 vs 67). Bands: under 15 days, 15 to 45, over 45.

Capital work in progress5% of fixed assetsWithin range

Capital work-in-progress is 5% of fixed assets. Bands: not rising or up to 30%; rising for three years and above 30%; rising and above 60%.

Payable days+6 days / 2 yrsWithin range

Days payable changed by +6 over two years. Bands: rise of up to 30 days; more than 30 days.

Tap a check to see how it is measured

How to read this

Each check is a named rule with fixed thresholds, not a score. Annual statements are the latest restated figures, so a past year may differ from what was originally reported.

All terms explained in the glossary →

Who has been buying and selling?

  • Over 3 years, FIIs added 11.2 pts; promoters trimmed 2.7 pts; DIIs added 1.0 pts.
  • The number of shareholders rose from 6,236 to 56,755 (+810%) between Sep 2023 and Jun 2026.

Holdings, Jun '26

How each group changed

GroupSep '23Jun '26Change
Promoters43.8%41.1%-2.7 pts
FIIs7.0%18.2%+11.2 pts
DIIs13.8%14.8%+1.0 pts
Public and others35.4%25.9%-9.5 pts

Number of shareholders

56,755shareholders+810% since Sep '23
6k23k40k57k Sep '23Jun '24Mar '25Dec '25Jun '26
Sep '23: 6,236
Dec '23: 8,339
Mar '24: 9,208
Jun '24: 10,632
Sep '24: 15,255
Dec '24: 19,191
Mar '25: 19,442
Jun '25: 23,648
Sep '25: 30,784
Dec '25: 56,192
Mar '26: 52,325
Jun '26: 56,755
6k23k40k57k Sep '23Sep '24Sep '25Jun '26
Sep '23: 6,236
Dec '23: 8,339
Mar '24: 9,208
Jun '24: 10,632
Sep '24: 15,255
Dec '24: 19,191
Mar '25: 19,442
Jun '25: 23,648
Sep '25: 30,784
Dec '25: 56,192
Mar '26: 52,325
Jun '26: 56,755

Quarterly shareholding as reported, labelled by the quarter it covers (it becomes visible about two months later).
Shareholder counts are only available for recent quarters.

This quarter's smart-money board

What happened next to similar setups

−7.6%typical 12-month return vs the marketNot meaningfully different from the base rate
  • We found 50 past situations where a non-financial company looked like SHAILY ENGINEERING PLASTICS LT today on valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, price momentum, size and volatility.
  • Over the following 12 months the middle half of them returned −25% to +24% vs the market, against −4% for all non-financial companies in the same months.
  • The gap against the base rate (−3.7%, 80% range −13.5% to +1.2%) is within what chance and overlapping periods produce.

Where the 50 outcomes landed

−100%−50%0%+50%+100%
METROPOLIS · Dec 2021: −62.8% vs market
JYOTICNC · May 2025: −55.0% vs market
TATVA · Sep 2022: −45.8% vs market
THEJO · Apr 2024: −42.7% vs market
BLS · Mar 2025: −39.2% vs market
ALKYLAMINE · Aug 2021: −35.3% vs market
LALPATHLAB · Jun 2021: −34.0% vs market
MAPMYINDIA · Oct 2023: −32.7% vs market
HAPPSTMNDS · Sep 2021: −28.2% vs market
COFORGE · Jul 2021: −27.7% vs market
RAINBOW · Jul 2023: −27.3% vs market
COCHINSHIP · Sep 2025: −26.9% vs market
EMAMILTD · Mar 2021: −25.5% vs market
ERIS · Apr 2020: −24.7% vs market
LTTS · Sep 2021: −23.8% vs market
SONACOMS · Jun 2022: −22.4% vs market
SBCL · Apr 2023: −20.8% vs market
ELGIEQUIP · May 2023: −20.4% vs market
TEGA · Aug 2025: −20.3% vs market
FLUOROCHEM · Aug 2022: −16.8% vs market
KPRMILL · May 2022: −16.3% vs market
VIDHIING · Apr 2022: −15.0% vs market
AVANTEL · Sep 2025: −12.1% vs market
GARFIBRES · Jun 2021: −9.1% vs market
DOMS · Jun 2025: −8.5% vs market
CENTURYPLY · Aug 2022: −6.8% vs market
POLYMED · Mar 2021: −6.5% vs market
PERSISTENT · Apr 2023: −3.8% vs market
EMUDHRA · May 2024: −3.1% vs market
KPITTECH · Sep 2023: −2.7% vs market
CRISIL · Jun 2022: −1.1% vs market
TASTYBITE · Apr 2020: +0.4% vs market
HESTERBIO · Apr 2020: +4.1% vs market
TBOTEK · Sep 2025: +9.9% vs market
INGERRAND · May 2023: +10.5% vs market
FINEORG · Mar 2022: +13.2% vs market
DATAPATTNS · May 2023: +22.2% vs market
HINDCOPPER · Oct 2025: +24.5% vs market
ASTRAMICRO · May 2025: +25.2% vs market
AZAD · Apr 2025: +28.6% vs market
NEWGEN · May 2024: +28.8% vs market
SOLARINDS · May 2022: +31.2% vs market
KFINTECH · Feb 2024: +32.3% vs market
THYROCARE · Aug 2025: +33.1% vs market
HBLENGINE · May 2025: +34.0% vs market
GANESHHOU · Feb 2024: +35.8% vs market
ASTRAL · Nov 2020: +41.0% vs market
VIJAYA · Sep 2025: +43.0% vs market
RPEL · Oct 2025: +125.2% vs market
ATGL · Feb 2020: +180.7% vs market
Similar setups −7.6%All companies −3.9%← worse than the marketbetter than the market →

Each dot is one past situation (hover or tap for details) · Solid dots are the closest matches, listed below · Shaded is the middle half of all companies in the same months · 2 beyond the range shown, drawn at the edge

Similar setups' median
−7.6%
All companies' median
−3.9%
Beat the market
38% vs 46%

50 past situations · 50 companies · 30 months · 2020–2025

The closest matches

CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
KPITTECH
Technology Services
Sep 2023 83x30% +75%−4% −3%
POLYMED
Health Technology
Mar 2021 76x25% +253%−6% −7%
VIJAYA
Health Services
Sep 2025 68x21% +4%−20% +43%
EMUDHRA
Technology Services
May 2024 96x24% +76%−7% −3%
ASTRAL
Producer Manufacturing
Nov 2020 90x21% +30%−2% +41%
Show the other 3 matches
CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
AVANTEL
Electronic Technology
Sep 2025 88x37% 0%−10% −12%
KFINTECH
Technology Services
Feb 2024 59x29% +133%−5% +32%
ATGL
Utilities
Feb 2020 64x24% +31%−28% +181%
How reliable is this?

Matched on P/E, P/S, ROCE, operating margin, debt/equity, interest cover, revenue growth, 12-month momentum, drawdown from 12-month high, size and volatility. Closest on: drawdown from 12-month high, 12-month momentum and size. One match per company and at most 7 from any one month.

Independent periods: the matches fall in 6 distinct 12-month windows. Matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, so fewer windows means less evidence.

How this is built

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to SHAILY ENGINEERING PLASTICS LT. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

Methodology

How historical analogs are built

Data as of 2026-11-09. Outcome pool: Jan 2020 to Oct 2025.

For every company we look at the situation it is in today (valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, 12-month price momentum, drawdown, size and volatility) and find past company-months that looked most like it. We then show what happened to those past situations over the following 12 months, measured against the ApnaFunda All index and against the base rate. It describes history. It does not predict anything.

What is compared

FeatureWeightNon-financialFinancial
P/E1yesyes
P/S1yes—
P/B1—yes
ROCE1yes—
operating margin1yes—
ROE1—yes
debt/equity0.75yes—
interest cover0.5yes—
revenue growth0.75yesyes
12-month momentum1yesyes
drawdown from 12-month high0.75yesyes
size0.75yesyes
volatility0.5yesyes

Weights were set by judgement before any outcome was looked at and are never tuned on results. Loss-making companies (negative P/E or net profit) are only matched with other loss-making companies. Banks, NBFCs and insurers are compared only with each other and use a different feature set. Every feature is converted, month by month, to its rank among companies in the same pool in that month, so a P/E of 30 in a hot market and a P/E of 22 in a cold one can match if both were equally expensive for their time. Only that month's data is used.

How closeness and the sample are defined

Distance is the weighted root-mean-square gap between the standardised features both companies have. A match needs at least 70% of the query's feature weight, a distance of at most 0.9, and 30 matches at minimum to be shown. We keep up to 50 matches with these exclusions: never the company itself, one match per company (its closest month), and at most 7 from any one calendar month so a single market episode cannot dominate.

Base rate

The base rate is the distribution of 12-month returns, relative to the market, of every eligible company-month in the same pool, with each month weighted to match the months the analogs came from. It answers: how did a random company do in these same months? Because matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, we also report the number of distinct 12-month windows behind a result, and a bootstrap that resamples months decides whether the analog median differs from the base rate at all. "Not meaningfully different" is the usual outcome and the page copy is written for it.

Limits you should know

  • One market period. The outcome pool covers 2020–2025 only (70 months), including the 2020 crash and the 2020–21 rally.
  • Survivorship. Only companies listed today are included. Delisted and bankrupt companies are missing, which flatters past outcomes, particularly for distressed-looking setups.
  • Price return only. Dividends are excluded, and the benchmark is an ApnaFunda market-cap-weighted index of the same listed companies, not an official index.
  • Reporting lag. Fundamentals are matched on an assumed 60-day lag after the quarter end, not on real announcement dates.
  • Pools: non-financial: 98,395 company-months from 2019 companies; financial: 5,659 company-months from 108 companies. 2349 companies currently have a result; the rest are suppressed because too few comparable situations exist.

Does it work? A walk-forward check

The walk-forward check has not been run for this build, so skill is shown as not yet measured.

Disclaimer

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to any company shown. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

What else looks like this?

Companies with the most similar financial profile today, regardless of industry.

CUPIDCUPID
Consumer Non-Durables
66%similar
EPS growthROCE
Electronic Technology
63%similar
P/Emarket cap
Health Technology
62%similar
ROCEoperating margin
Electronic Technology
60%similar
promoter holdingP/E
Electronic Technology
59%similar
revenuemarket cap
Process Industries
68%similar
P/EEPS growth
Process Industries
49%similar
revenue growthoperating margin
Process Industries
44%similar
operating marginmarket cap

Similarity is statistical, based on reported metrics; it does not imply similar business quality or future returns.

What changed?

30 events since Jun '23

  1. SepPromoterPromoter holding fell 2.3 pts to 41.1%.
  2. SepInstitutionsFII + DII holding rose 7.4 pts over 2 quarters to 33.0%.
  3. SepPriceVolume reached 6.0x its 50-day median on 2026-09-21; price +3.7% that day.
  4. MayPriceRegained the 2025-11 peak, 4 months after the low.
  5. AprPriceVolume reached 14.4x its 50-day median on 2026-04-24; price +14.5% that day.
  6. MarPriceVolume reached 11.7x its 50-day median on 2026-03-17; price +19.0% that day.
  7. JanPriceFell 34% from the Nov 2025 peak to the Jan 2026 low.
  8. DecInstitutionsFII + DII holding rose 3.9 pts over 2 quarters to 25.0%.
Show 22 earlier events
  1. NovValuationP/E crossed above the 90th percentile of its own history to date (102.3x).
  2. OctPriceVolume reached 19.3x its 50-day median on 2025-10-07; price +11.4% that day.
  3. AugPriceVolume reached 31.4x its 50-day median on 2025-08-12; price +5.3% that day.
  4. JunPeer rankMoved into the top quartile of Process Industries on ROCE (from the 2nd quartile).
  5. MayPriceRegained the 2025-03 peak, 1 month after the low.
  6. MayValuationP/E crossed above the 90th percentile of its own history to date (110.3x).
  7. MayPriceVolume reached 5.8x its 50-day median on 2025-05-20; price +8.2% that day.
  8. AprPriceFell 28% from the Mar 2025 peak to the Apr 2025 low.
  9. MarInstitutionsFII + DII holding rose 5.5 pts over 2 quarters to 17.1%.
  10. FebPriceVolume reached 7.2x its 50-day median on 2025-02-28; price +2.2% that day.
  11. DecPriceVolume reached 10.6x its 50-day median on 2024-12-11; price +6.9% that day.
  12. SepPriceVolume reached 9.0x its 50-day median on 2024-09-17; price +3.8% that day.
  13. AugValuationP/E crossed above the 90th percentile of its own history to date (84.4x).
  14. JunResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned positive.
  15. JunInstitutionsFII + DII holding fell 6.5 pts over 2 quarters to 14.3%.
  16. JunPeer rankMoved into the 2nd quartile of Process Industries on ROCE (from the 3rd quartile).
  17. JunDividendStarted paying a dividend (payout 8% of profit).
  18. FebPriceRegained the 2022-04 peak, 11 months after the low.
  19. JanPriceVolume reached 15.6x its 50-day median on 2024-01-30; price +15.2% that day.
  20. NovPriceVolume reached 6.2x its 50-day median on 2023-11-22; price +1.3% that day.
  21. AugPriceVolume reached 10.4x its 50-day median on 2023-08-09; price +11.2% that day.
  22. JunResultsRevenue (TTM) reached a new high of ₹607 cr.

Events are generated from the data by fixed rules.
The month shown is when the change became visible in the reported figures, assuming a 60-day lag after each quarter end; it is not an announcement date.

Where price and fundamentals disagree, market-wide Rewind the whole market to any month

Monthly history54 months · 2022-06 to 2026-11
MonthP/ERevenue (TTM)ROEROCEDebt / Equity
2026-1180.3x₹1025 cr24.7%29.0%0.2x
2026-1082.4x₹1025 cr24.6%29.0%0.2x
2026-0979.6x₹1025 cr24.6%29.0%0.2x
2026-0888.5x₹991 cr23.6%29.0%0.2x
2026-0782.8x₹991 cr23.6%29.0%0.2x
2026-0678.3x₹991 cr23.6%29.0%0.2x
2026-0586.8x₹972 cr28.9%20.0%0.3x
2026-0473.5x₹972 cr28.9%20.0%0.3x
2026-0360.5x₹972 cr28.9%20.0%0.3x
2026-0261.3x₹920 cr26.7%20.0%0.3x
2026-0160.2x₹920 cr26.7%20.0%0.3x
2025-1271.1x₹920 cr26.7%20.0%0.3x
2025-11102.3x₹855 cr21.4%20.0%0.3x
2025-1089.4x₹855 cr21.4%20.0%0.3x
2025-0985.6x₹855 cr21.4%20.0%0.3x
2025-08110.1x₹787 cr17.0%20.0%0.3x
2025-0778.2x₹787 cr17.0%20.0%0.3x
2025-0682.0x₹787 cr17.0%20.0%0.3x
2025-05110.3x₹740 cr18.1%14.0%0.5x
2025-0483.7x₹740 cr18.1%14.0%0.5x
2025-03100.0x₹740 cr18.1%14.0%0.5x
2025-0295.1x₹700 cr15.9%14.0%0.5x
2025-0196.3x₹700 cr15.9%14.0%0.5x
2024-1290.1x₹700 cr15.9%14.0%0.5x
2024-1195.7x₹666 cr13.5%14.0%0.5x
2024-1074.4x₹666 cr13.5%14.0%0.5x
2024-0974.5x₹666 cr13.5%14.0%0.5x
2024-0884.4x₹644 cr12.4%14.0%0.5x
2024-0769.0x₹644 cr12.4%14.0%0.5x
2024-0664.2x₹644 cr12.4%14.0%0.5x
2024-0583.0x₹607 cr8.7%11.0%0.5x
2024-0482.9x₹607 cr8.7%11.0%0.5x
2024-0369.2x₹607 cr8.7%11.0%0.5x
2024-0270.5x₹607 cr8.7%11.0%0.5x
2024-0151.7x₹607 cr8.7%11.0%0.5x
2023-1243.9x₹607 cr8.7%11.0%0.5x
2023-1141.2x₹607 cr8.7%11.0%0.5x
2023-1046.7x₹607 cr8.7%11.0%0.5x
2023-0947.0x₹607 cr8.7%11.0%0.5x
2023-0844.5x₹607 cr8.7%11.0%0.5x
2023-0734.7x₹607 cr8.7%11.0%0.5x
2023-0638.6x₹607 cr8.7%11.0%0.5x
2023-0533.5x₹568 cr9.5%—0.5x
2023-0430.1x₹568 cr9.5%—0.5x
2023-0326.8x₹568 cr9.5%—0.5x
2023-0228.4x₹568 cr9.5%—0.5x
2023-0139.8x₹568 cr9.5%—0.5x
2022-1241.3x₹568 cr9.5%—0.5x
2022-1143.7x₹568 cr9.5%—0.5x
2022-1050.2x₹568 cr9.5%—0.5x
2022-0950.6x₹568 cr9.5%—0.5x
2022-0850.9x₹568 cr9.5%—0.5x
2022-0749.7x₹568 cr9.5%—0.5x
2022-0649.5x₹568 cr9.5%—0.5x

Methodology and data notes

Methodology

Methodology and data notes

All figures come from public exchange prices and screener.in financial statements. Quarterly and annual results are shown from 60 days after the period end, so a month never uses a result before it would plausibly have been published. Statements are the latest versions, which may include later restatements.

Sector medians, percentiles and indices use today's listed companies in the sector (survivorship bias). Prices are adjusted for splits and bonus issues; around a corporate action the fundamentals may lag the price by up to a month, and affected sections are hidden.

The return decomposition uses price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count. The reverse DCF uses a fixed 12% cost of equity, a 10-year horizon and a 15x terminal P/E, and is an illustration only. Events, flags and twins follow fixed rules and thresholds described next to each section.

Feedback