अApnaFunda

CUPID LIMITED (CUPID)

Consumer Non-Durables · Household/Personal Care · figures to Nov '26

Quality scoreHow the business itself ranks against its sector peers on profitability, 3-year growth and leverage. 50 is the middle of the sector.92 / 100
Profitability 95Growth 96Balance sheet 83
Momentum scoreHow strong the recent trend is: 3-month price change, 12-month improvement in earnings and the rise in FII + DII holding, among companies above ₹500 cr.95 / 100
Price 96Earnings 96FII/DII 94

Passes these screensQuality CompounderHigh MomentumDebt-light & profitablePromoters buyingConsistent compounders

Share price

Closing priceAdjusted for splits and bonus issues.

₹342.85 latest close · +72.4% over the last 90 sessions

₹200₹300Jul 3Jul 29Aug 24Sep 17Oct 14Nov 9 ₹200₹300Jul 3Sep 4Nov 9

₹342.85 month-end · +420.7% over 12 months

₹100₹200₹300Nov '25Jan '26Apr '26Jun '26Sep '26Nov '26 ₹100₹200₹300Nov '25May '26Nov '26

₹342.85 month-end · +3933.5% over 3 years

₹0₹100₹200₹300Nov '23Jun '24Jan '25Sep '25Apr '26Nov '26 ₹0₹100₹200₹300Nov '23May '25Nov '26

₹342.85 month-end · +15137.8% since Jun '21

₹0₹100₹200₹300Jun '21Jul '22Aug '23Sep '24Oct '25Nov '26 ₹0₹100₹200₹300Jun '21Mar '24Nov '26

52-week range ₹47.85 to ₹368.95 · 1-year volatility 59.1%

Was the rally earned?

+421%share price, 1 yearEarnings and multiple

Both mattered.

  • Per-share earnings added 273 points and the multiple added 148 points (P/E 188.1x to 336.1x).
  • The share count fell 2%.
Net profit growth: +267 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+267 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: +148 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+148 ptsP/E changeShare count change: +5 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.+5 ptsShare count changeShare price: +421%+421%Share priceNet profit growth: +267 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+267ProfitP/E change: +148 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+148P/EShare count change: +5 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.+5SharesShare price: +421%+421%Share price
Net profit growth+267 ptsNet profit rose about 185%, which lifts the price.
P/E change+148 ptsThe P/E rose from 188.1x to 336.1x, which lifts the price.
Share count change+5 ptsShare count fell 2%, which lifts the price.
+3934%share price, 3 yearsEarnings and multiple

Both mattered.

  • Per-share earnings added 1632 points and the multiple added 2302 points (P/E 38.6x to 336.1x).
  • The share count barely moved.
Net profit growth: +1652 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+1652 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: +2302 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+2302 ptsP/E changeShare count change: −20 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−20 ptsShare count changeShare price: +3934%+3934%Share priceNet profit growth: +1652 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+1652ProfitP/E change: +2302 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+2302P/EShare count change: −20 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−20SharesShare price: +3934%+3934%Share price
Net profit growth+1652 ptsNet profit rose about 372%, which lifts the price.
P/E change+2302 ptsThe P/E rose from 38.6x to 336.1x, which lifts the price.
Share count change-20 ptsShare count was little changed. More shares would count against the price.
+16226%share price, 5 yearsMultiple-driven

Partly.

  • Most of the rise came from investors paying a higher multiple (P/E 9.5x to 336.1x); per-share earnings added 4885 points.
  • The share count barely moved.
Net profit growth: +4944 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+4944 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: +11341 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+11341 ptsP/E changeShare count change: −59 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−59 ptsShare count changeShare price: +16226%+16226%Share priceNet profit growth: +4944 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+4944ProfitP/E change: +11341 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+11341P/EShare count change: −59 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−59SharesShare price: +16226%+16226%Share price
Net profit growth+4944 ptsNet profit rose about 372%, which lifts the price.
P/E change+11341 ptsThe P/E rose from 9.5x to 336.1x, which lifts the price.
Share count change-59 ptsShare count was little changed. More shares would count against the price.
What do "pts" mean?

"pts" are percentage points of the share price return. The parts add up to the total shown for each period. Because price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count, higher profit pushes the price up, a higher P/E pushes it up, and more shares push it down.

Example: if the price rose 34% and profit growth accounts for +58 pts while a lower P/E accounts for -24 pts, then 58 - 24 = 34. The +58 is not the profit growth rate itself: it is the part of the price move that profit growth explains.

Net profit is trailing twelve months as reported with a 60-day lag.

Compare this with HINDUSTAN UNILEVER

How rough has the ride been?

Maximum drawdown-58.0%recovered 2025-07
1-year volatility59.1%annualised
Beta vs sector index0.623-year daily, correlation 0.16
Volume spikes2last 90 sessions, 5x the 50-day median

Drawdown from peak

0%−20%−40%−60%2020202120222023202420252026−57.0% 0%−20%−40%−60%2020202220242026−57.0%
Largest drawdowns

-58.0% (2024-03 peak to 2025-04 low, recovered 2025-07)

-50.0% (2020-01 peak to 2020-03 low, recovered 2020-08)

-42.0% (2022-05 peak to 2022-06 low, recovered 2023-08)

Most recent volume spikes

2026-07-10: 5.1x the 50-day median, price +1.1% that day

2026-07-09: 5.5x the 50-day median, price +6.6% that day

Beta is the slope of daily returns against a market-cap-weighted index of the sector's other listed companies, built from today's constituents (so it excludes companies no longer listed).

Is it expensive against its own past and its peers?

336.1xP/E todayNear its historic high
Against its own history98th percentile
CheapestMedian 39.3xDearest

Usual range 10.2x to 216.7x since 2021-06.

Against Consumer Non-Durables336.1x vs 26.8x
This company
336.1x
Sector median
26.8x

1155% above the Consumer Non-Durables median.

9.6x123.2x236.9x350.6xJun '21Jul '22Aug '23Sep '24Oct '25Nov '269.6x123.2x236.9x350.6xJun '21Apr '23Feb '25Nov '26
P/E (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianConsumer Non-Durables median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/B (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianConsumer Non-Durables median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/S (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianConsumer Non-Durables median
How to read this

Shaded band: 10th to 90th percentile of the company's own P/E history; dotted line: its median; orange line: sector median (companies with a positive multiple, at least 5 in the sector).

Sector figures are built from today's listed companies, so they exclude companies that are no longer listed.

All terms explained in the glossary →

How Consumer Non-Durables is valued

Where does it rank among Consumer Non-Durables peers?

Each cell is the company's percentile rank among its Consumer Non-Durables peers (non-financial companies) that month.
Darker is better-ranked.
Rows marked ↓ are inverted (lower debt, shorter cash cycle and a lower P/E rank higher).

Where it ranks today

  • ROCE92nd▲ 28 pts vs a year ago
  • Op. margin99th▲ 7 pts vs a year ago
  • Revenue growth100th▲ 27 pts vs a year ago
  • EPS growth96th▲ 25 pts vs a year ago
  • Debt/equity ↓70th▼ 11 pts vs a year ago
  • Cash cycle ↓16th▲ 14 pts vs a year ago
  • P/E ↓2ndflat vs a year ago
  • 12M momentum100thflat vs a year ago

Rank history

ROCE
Op. margin
Revenue growth
EPS growth
Debt/equity ↓
Cash cycle ↓
P/E ↓
12M momentum
Dec '21Jul '22Jan '23Jul '23Jan '24Jul '24Jan '25Jul '25Jan '26Jul '26Nov '26
Lower rank Higher rank Not enough data

Percentiles use today's listed companies in the sector and need at least 5 peers with a value; grey cells have too few.
ROE is computed from net profit and book value where the source does not report it.

The Consumer Non-Durables sector page Watch it move against Consumer Non-Durables in the Observatory

What is the price implying?

~68%annual earnings growth implied by the price

At a P/E of 844.9x, the price would imply about 67.6%/yr earnings growth for 10 years under the same assumptions, but it is not ranked.

Fewer than six years of annual earnings are available, which is too little to measure delivered growth.

“Implied growth” is what the current price would require under our stated assumptions, not what we expect.

What prices imply across Consumer Non-Durables The market-wide Expectations lists

Key figures

Share Priceclose 9 Nov
₹342.85
P/E
336.1x
ROCE
34.0%
Market Cap
₹46038 cr
Revenue (TTM)
₹453 cr
P/S
101.6x
P/B
102.3x
ROE
30.4%
Operating Margin
39.0%
Debt / Equity
0.1x
Promoter Holding
46.2%
12M Momentum
420.7%

52-week range

₹47.85₹368.95
92% of the way from its 52-week low to its high

Price risk

1Y volatility
59.1%
Beta vs sector
1-year daily
0.77

Balance sheet & cash

Interest cover
operating profit ÷ interest
46.8x
Cash from profit, 3Y
operating cash flow ÷ net profit
0.23x
low
Share count, 1Y
-0.7%

Are profits backed by cash?

2 of 7checks within range1 beyond a threshold
Other income reliance17%Near threshold

Other income as a share of pre-tax profit (trailing twelve months): 17.0%. Bands: below 15%, 15% to 35%, above 35%.

Tax rate25%Within range

Median quarterly effective tax rate over about 2.5 years: 24.5%. Bands: 15% to 35%, 5% to 15% or 35% to 50%, outside 5% to 50%.

Cash conversion0.23xBeyond threshold

Operating cash flow divided by net profit over the last three fiscal years: 0.23x (cash from operations ₹43 cr, net profit ₹189 cr). Bands: 0.8x and above, 0.5x to 0.8x, below 0.5x.

Free cash flow2 of 4 yrsNear threshold

Fiscal years with positive free cash flow in the last 4: 2. Bands: at least 80% of years, 40% to 80%, below 40%.

Receivable days vs history+1 daysWithin range

Debtor days are above the median of the previous three fiscal years by 1 days (103 vs 102). Bands: under 15 days, 15 to 45, over 45.

Capital work in progress37% of fixed assetsNear threshold

Capital work-in-progress is 37% of fixed assets. Bands: not rising or up to 30%; rising for three years and above 30%; rising and above 60%.

Payable days+152 days / 2 yrsNear threshold

Days payable changed by +152 over two years. Bands: rise of up to 30 days; more than 30 days.

Tap a check to see how it is measured

How to read this

Each check is a named rule with fixed thresholds, not a score. Annual statements are the latest restated figures, so a past year may differ from what was originally reported.

All terms explained in the glossary →

Who has been buying and selling?

  • Over 3 years, FIIs added 3.8 pts; promoters added 1.2 pts.
  • The number of shareholders rose from 28,154 to 3.0 lakh (+949%) between Sep 2023 and Jun 2026.

Holdings, Jun '26

How each group changed

GroupSep '23Jun '26Change
Promoters45.1%46.2%+1.2 pts
FIIs0.3%4.2%+3.8 pts
DIIs0.0%0.3%+0.3 pts
Public and others54.6%49.2%-5.4 pts

Number of shareholders

3.0 lakhshareholders+949% since Sep '23
26k1.2L2.1L3.0L Sep '23Jun '24Mar '25Dec '25Jun '26
Sep '23: 28,154
Dec '23: 25,582
Mar '24: 33,761
Jun '24: 95,639
Sep '24: 1.1 lakh
Dec '24: 1.2 lakh
Mar '25: 1.2 lakh
Jun '25: 99,813
Sep '25: 97,483
Dec '25: 1.5 lakh
Mar '26: 2.1 lakh
Jun '26: 3.0 lakh
26k1.2L2.1L3.0L Sep '23Sep '24Sep '25Jun '26
Sep '23: 28,154
Dec '23: 25,582
Mar '24: 33,761
Jun '24: 95,639
Sep '24: 1.1 lakh
Dec '24: 1.2 lakh
Mar '25: 1.2 lakh
Jun '25: 99,813
Sep '25: 97,483
Dec '25: 1.5 lakh
Mar '26: 2.1 lakh
Jun '26: 3.0 lakh

Quarterly shareholding as reported, labelled by the quarter it covers (it becomes visible about two months later).
Shareholder counts are only available for recent quarters.

This quarter's smart-money board

What happened next to similar setups

−9.2%typical 12-month return vs the marketNot meaningfully different from the base rate
  • We found 50 past situations where a non-financial company looked like CUPID LIMITED today on valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, price momentum, size and volatility.
  • Over the following 12 months the middle half of them returned −33% to +21% vs the market, against −5% for all non-financial companies in the same months.
  • The gap against the base rate (−4.5%, 80% range −18.6% to +2.3%) is within what chance and overlapping periods produce.

Where the 50 outcomes landed

−100%−50%0%+50%+100%
BALAXI · Oct 2020: −58.0% vs market
NEWGEN · Dec 2024: −53.0% vs market
GMMPFAUDLR · Aug 2020: −52.5% vs market
TAC · Oct 2025: −51.7% vs market
IEX · Nov 2021: −45.5% vs market
POLYMED · Apr 2025: −44.9% vs market
FINEORG · Sep 2022: −40.8% vs market
THYROCARE · Oct 2020: −37.9% vs market
JSLL · Sep 2025: −37.7% vs market
ASTRAZEN · Jun 2020: −37.7% vs market
JWL · May 2024: −37.6% vs market
EASEMYTRIP · Jul 2022: −33.5% vs market
KFINTECH · Dec 2024: −33.3% vs market
ASTEC · Oct 2020: −30.8% vs market
NPST · Aug 2024: −30.6% vs market
JYOTICNC · Jan 2025: −29.3% vs market
HAPPSTMNDS · Sep 2021: −28.2% vs market
CDSL · Jun 2025: −27.4% vs market
FCL · Oct 2022: −25.4% vs market
OLECTRA · Jan 2024: −22.2% vs market
BALAMINES · Aug 2021: −20.0% vs market
KRISHNADEF · Jun 2024: −19.9% vs market
TASTYBITE · Jun 2020: −15.8% vs market
NETWEB · Aug 2024: −12.0% vs market
DIXON · Feb 2021: −9.4% vs market
AZAD · Dec 2024: −9.1% vs market
COCHINSHIP · Jun 2024: −8.7% vs market
SIGMA · May 2022: −7.5% vs market
DMART · Feb 2020: −5.4% vs market
NEULANDLAB · Nov 2024: −0.4% vs market
COHANCE · Mar 2021: +0.8% vs market
INDIAMART · Sep 2020: +2.5% vs market
TRITURBINE · Jun 2023: +4.1% vs market
KPITTECH · Aug 2023: +4.8% vs market
EMUDHRA · Mar 2024: +8.7% vs market
DATAPATTNS · Jun 2023: +9.7% vs market
AFFLE · Sep 2020: +13.6% vs market
APOLLO · Sep 2025: +23.0% vs market
ALKYLAMINE · Jan 2021: +28.7% vs market
ZENTEC · Aug 2023: +37.1% vs market
BSE · Jun 2025: +39.3% vs market
SHAILY · Oct 2025: +47.3% vs market
POWERINDIA · Jul 2025: +52.0% vs market
KRN · Oct 2025: +54.0% vs market
INDOTHAI · Mar 2025: +57.0% vs market
MCX · Jun 2025: +58.3% vs market
ATGL · May 2021: +64.5% vs market
BLS · Jan 2023: +65.0% vs market
ACUTAAS · Aug 2025: +108.7% vs market
KAYNES · Dec 2023: +141.7% vs market
Similar setups −9.2%All companies −4.7%← worse than the marketbetter than the market →

Each dot is one past situation (hover or tap for details) · Solid dots are the closest matches, listed below · Shaded is the middle half of all companies in the same months · 2 beyond the range shown, drawn at the edge

Similar setups' median
−9.2%
All companies' median
−4.7%
Beat the market
40% vs 45%

50 past situations · 50 companies · 35 months · 2020–2025

The closest matches

CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
ATGL
Utilities
May 2021 340x34% +1048%0% +65%
GMMPFAUDLR
Producer Manufacturing
Aug 2020 115x31% +279%−14% −53%
AFFLE
Technology Services
Sep 2020 112x43% +156%−6% +14%
NPST
Technology Services
Aug 2024 242x80% +656%−5% −31%
ZENTEC
Technology Services
Aug 2023 156x23% +301%−3% +37%
Show the other 3 matches
CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
INDIAMART
Retail Trade
Sep 2020 98x84% +182%−6% +3%
JSLL
Health Services
Sep 2025 85x— +160%−5% −38%
TAC
Technology Services
Oct 2025 119x44% +133%−5% −52%
How reliable is this?

Matched on P/E, P/S, ROCE, operating margin, debt/equity, interest cover, revenue growth, 12-month momentum, drawdown from 12-month high, size and volatility. Closest on: drawdown from 12-month high, debt/equity and ROCE. One match per company and at most 7 from any one month.

Independent periods: the matches fall in 6 distinct 12-month windows. Matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, so fewer windows means less evidence.

How this is built

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to CUPID LIMITED. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

Methodology

How historical analogs are built

Data as of 2026-11-09. Outcome pool: Jan 2020 to Oct 2025.

For every company we look at the situation it is in today (valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, 12-month price momentum, drawdown, size and volatility) and find past company-months that looked most like it. We then show what happened to those past situations over the following 12 months, measured against the ApnaFunda All index and against the base rate. It describes history. It does not predict anything.

What is compared

FeatureWeightNon-financialFinancial
P/E1yesyes
P/S1yes—
P/B1—yes
ROCE1yes—
operating margin1yes—
ROE1—yes
debt/equity0.75yes—
interest cover0.5yes—
revenue growth0.75yesyes
12-month momentum1yesyes
drawdown from 12-month high0.75yesyes
size0.75yesyes
volatility0.5yesyes

Weights were set by judgement before any outcome was looked at and are never tuned on results. Loss-making companies (negative P/E or net profit) are only matched with other loss-making companies. Banks, NBFCs and insurers are compared only with each other and use a different feature set. Every feature is converted, month by month, to its rank among companies in the same pool in that month, so a P/E of 30 in a hot market and a P/E of 22 in a cold one can match if both were equally expensive for their time. Only that month's data is used.

How closeness and the sample are defined

Distance is the weighted root-mean-square gap between the standardised features both companies have. A match needs at least 70% of the query's feature weight, a distance of at most 0.9, and 30 matches at minimum to be shown. We keep up to 50 matches with these exclusions: never the company itself, one match per company (its closest month), and at most 7 from any one calendar month so a single market episode cannot dominate.

Base rate

The base rate is the distribution of 12-month returns, relative to the market, of every eligible company-month in the same pool, with each month weighted to match the months the analogs came from. It answers: how did a random company do in these same months? Because matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, we also report the number of distinct 12-month windows behind a result, and a bootstrap that resamples months decides whether the analog median differs from the base rate at all. "Not meaningfully different" is the usual outcome and the page copy is written for it.

Limits you should know

  • One market period. The outcome pool covers 2020–2025 only (70 months), including the 2020 crash and the 2020–21 rally.
  • Survivorship. Only companies listed today are included. Delisted and bankrupt companies are missing, which flatters past outcomes, particularly for distressed-looking setups.
  • Price return only. Dividends are excluded, and the benchmark is an ApnaFunda market-cap-weighted index of the same listed companies, not an official index.
  • Reporting lag. Fundamentals are matched on an assumed 60-day lag after the quarter end, not on real announcement dates.
  • Pools: non-financial: 98,395 company-months from 2019 companies; financial: 5,659 company-months from 108 companies. 2349 companies currently have a result; the rest are suppressed because too few comparable situations exist.

Does it work? A walk-forward check

The walk-forward check has not been run for this build, so skill is shown as not yet measured.

Disclaimer

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to any company shown. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

What else looks like this?

Companies with the most similar financial profile today, regardless of industry.

Process Industries
66%similar
EPS growthROCE
Process Industries
64%similar
ROCEEPS growth
Electronic Technology
64%similar
promoter holdingmarket cap
Electronic Technology
62%similar
revenuerevenue growth
Electronic Technology
55%similar
revenue growthEPS growth
Consumer Non-Durables
29%similar
ROCEoperating margin
ADF FOODSADFFOODS
Consumer Non-Durables
28%similar
debt/equityrevenue
Consumer Non-Durables
28%similar
ROCEpromoter holding

Similarity is statistical, based on reported metrics; it does not imply similar business quality or future returns.

What changed?

30 events since Aug '23

  1. SepInstitutionsFII + DII holding rose 3.3 pts over 1 quarter to 4.5%.
  2. JulPriceVolume reached 5.5x its 50-day median on 2026-07-09; price +6.6% that day.
  3. JunPeer rankMoved into the top quartile of Consumer Non-Durables on ROCE (from the 2nd quartile).
  4. AprPriceRegained the 2026-01 peak, 3 months after the low.
  5. MarPeer rankMoved into the top quartile of Consumer Non-Durables on EPS growth (from the 2nd quartile).
  6. JanPriceFell 28% from the Jan 2026 peak to the Jan 2026 low.
  7. JanPriceVolume reached 16.5x its 50-day median on 2026-01-05; price -7.1% that day.
  8. DecPromoterPromoter holding rose 3.1 pts to 45.6%.
Show 22 earlier events
  1. OctPriceVolume reached 7.2x its 50-day median on 2025-10-09; price +11.9% that day.
  2. SepResultsRevenue (TTM) reached a new high of ₹204 cr.
  3. SepPeer rankMoved into the 2nd quartile of Consumer Non-Durables on EPS growth (from the 3rd quartile).
  4. JulPriceRegained the 2024-03 peak, 3 months after the low.
  5. JulPriceVolume reached 15.9x its 50-day median on 2025-07-18; price +9.7% that day.
  6. JunValuationP/E crossed above the 90th percentile of its own history to date (71.7x).
  7. JunPeer rankSlipped to the 3rd quartile of Consumer Non-Durables on EPS growth (from the top quartile).
  8. JunSharesShare count is up 107.7% over 12 months.
  9. AprPriceFell 58% from the Mar 2024 peak to the Apr 2025 low.
  10. AprPriceVolume reached 16.3x its 50-day median on 2025-04-16; price +11.3% that day.
  11. MarPromoterPromoter holding fell 3.1 pts to 42.5%.
  12. FebPriceVolume reached 7.9x its 50-day median on 2025-02-17; price +0.7% that day.
  13. DecResultsRevenue (TTM) reached a new high of ₹184 cr.
  14. DecPriceVolume reached 5.4x its 50-day median on 2024-12-11; price +0.3% that day.
  15. JunResultsRevenue (TTM) reached a new high of ₹172 cr.
  16. JunInstitutionsFII + DII holding rose 4.9 pts over 2 quarters to 5.2%.
  17. JunPeer rankMoved into the top quartile of Consumer Non-Durables on EPS growth (from the 3rd quartile).
  18. JunDividendDividend payout cut from 21% to 0% of profit.
  19. AprPeer rankSlipped to the 3rd quartile of Consumer Non-Durables on EPS growth (from the 2nd quartile).
  20. OctPriceVolume reached 15.9x its 50-day median on 2023-10-12; price +18.8% that day.
  21. AugPriceRegained the 2022-05 peak, 14 months after the low.
  22. AugPriceVolume reached 44.1x its 50-day median on 2023-08-11; price +13.8% that day.

Events are generated from the data by fixed rules.
The month shown is when the change became visible in the reported figures, assuming a 60-day lag after each quarter end; it is not an announcement date.

Where price and fundamentals disagree, market-wide Rewind the whole market to any month

Monthly history66 months · 2021-06 to 2026-11
MonthP/ERevenue (TTM)ROEROCEDebt / Equity
2026-11336.1x₹453 cr30.4%34.0%0.1x
2026-10318.2x₹453 cr30.4%34.0%0.1x
2026-09305.5x₹453 cr30.4%34.0%0.1x
2026-08350.6x₹358 cr24.0%34.0%0.1x
2026-07288.3x₹358 cr24.0%34.0%0.1x
2026-06237.4x₹358 cr24.0%34.0%0.1x
2026-05208.2x₹294 cr24.6%17.0%0.1x
2026-04192.9x₹294 cr24.6%17.0%0.1x
2026-03134.0x₹294 cr24.6%17.0%0.1x
2026-02176.7x₹246 cr18.1%17.0%0.1x
2026-01174.3x₹246 cr18.1%17.0%0.1x
2025-12225.2x₹246 cr18.1%17.0%0.1x
2025-11188.1x₹204 cr14.0%17.0%0.1x
2025-10133.4x₹204 cr14.0%17.0%0.1x
2025-09122.9x₹204 cr14.0%17.0%0.1x
2025-08114.8x₹183 cr12.0%17.0%0.1x
2025-07100.7x₹183 cr12.0%17.0%0.1x
2025-0671.7x₹183 cr12.0%17.0%0.1x
2025-0555.5x₹190 cr17.6%—0.0x
2025-0440.1x₹190 cr17.6%—0.0x
2025-0332.2x₹190 cr17.6%—0.0x
2025-0235.8x₹184 cr16.9%—0.0x
2025-0137.6x₹184 cr16.9%—0.0x
2024-1239.9x₹184 cr16.9%—0.0x
2024-1157.5x₹172 cr13.3%—0.0x
2024-1053.8x₹172 cr13.3%—0.0x
2024-0955.0x₹172 cr13.3%—0.0x
2024-0856.8x₹172 cr13.3%—0.0x
2024-0761.5x₹172 cr13.3%—0.0x
2024-0660.7x₹172 cr13.3%—0.0x
2024-0584.5x₹149 cr22.1%—0.0x
2024-0498.4x₹149 cr22.1%—0.0x
2024-03110.2x₹149 cr22.1%—0.0x
2024-02122.7x₹149 cr22.1%—0.0x
2024-0180.0x₹149 cr22.1%—0.0x
2023-1250.9x₹149 cr22.1%—0.0x
2023-1138.6x₹149 cr22.1%—0.0x
2023-1028.6x₹149 cr22.1%—0.0x
2023-0918.6x₹149 cr22.1%—0.0x
2023-0816.6x₹149 cr22.1%—0.0x
2023-0713.0x₹149 cr22.1%—0.0x
2023-0611.4x₹149 cr22.1%—0.0x
2023-0511.6x₹149 cr22.1%—0.0x
2023-0412.7x₹149 cr22.1%—0.0x
2023-0311.6x₹149 cr22.1%—0.0x
2023-0211.4x₹149 cr22.1%—0.0x
2023-0112.5x₹149 cr22.1%—0.0x
2022-1212.5x₹149 cr22.1%—0.0x
2022-1111.4x₹149 cr22.1%—0.0x
2022-1010.5x₹149 cr22.1%—0.0x
2022-0910.7x₹149 cr22.1%—0.0x
2022-0810.0x₹149 cr22.1%—0.0x
2022-0710.0x₹149 cr22.1%—0.0x
2022-069.8x₹149 cr22.1%—0.0x
2022-0510.9x₹149 cr22.1%—0.0x
2022-0413.6x₹149 cr22.1%—0.0x
2022-0310.7x₹149 cr22.1%—0.0x
2022-029.8x₹149 cr22.1%—0.0x
2022-019.8x₹149 cr22.1%—0.0x
2021-1210.2x₹149 cr22.1%—0.0x
2021-119.5x₹149 cr22.1%—0.0x
2021-1010.2x₹149 cr22.1%—0.0x
2021-0910.5x₹149 cr22.1%—0.0x
2021-0810.2x₹149 cr22.1%—0.0x
2021-0711.1x₹149 cr22.1%—0.0x
2021-0610.2x₹149 cr22.1%—0.0x

Methodology and data notes

Methodology

Methodology and data notes

All figures come from public exchange prices and screener.in financial statements. Quarterly and annual results are shown from 60 days after the period end, so a month never uses a result before it would plausibly have been published. Statements are the latest versions, which may include later restatements.

Sector medians, percentiles and indices use today's listed companies in the sector (survivorship bias). Prices are adjusted for splits and bonus issues; around a corporate action the fundamentals may lag the price by up to a month, and affected sections are hidden.

The return decomposition uses price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count. The reverse DCF uses a fixed 12% cost of equity, a 10-year horizon and a 15x terminal P/E, and is an illustration only. Events, flags and twins follow fixed rules and thresholds described next to each section.

Feedback