अApnaFunda
Menu

GMM PFAUDLER LTD (GMMPFAUDLR)

Producer Manufacturing · Industrial Machinery · figures to Nov '26

Quality scoreHow the business itself ranks against its sector peers on profitability, 3-year growth and leverage. 50 is the middle of the sector.27 / 100
Profitability 43Growth 19Balance sheet 19
Momentum scoreHow strong the recent trend is: 3-month price change, 12-month improvement in earnings and the rise in FII + DII holding, among companies above ₹500 cr.50 / 100
Price 87Earnings 57FII/DII 7

Passes these screensCash Rich

Compare withWELSPUN CORPVOLTASTHERMAX

Share price

Closing priceAdjusted for splits and bonus issues.

₹1,144.7 latest close · +47.4% over the last 90 sessions

₹750₹1,000₹1,250₹1,500Jul 3Jul 29Aug 24Sep 17Oct 14Nov 9 ₹750₹1,000₹1,250₹1,500Jul 3Sep 4Nov 9

₹1,144.7 month-end · +1.9% over 12 months

₹750₹1,000₹1,250₹1,500Nov '25Jan '26Apr '26Jun '26Sep '26Nov '26 ₹750₹1,000₹1,250₹1,500Nov '25May '26Nov '26

₹1,144.7 month-end · −23.2% over 3 years

₹1,000₹1,500Nov '23Jun '24Jan '25Sep '25Apr '26Nov '26 ₹1,000₹1,500Nov '23May '25Nov '26

₹1,144.7 month-end · +213.6% since Jan '19

₹500₹1,000₹1,500₹2,000Jan '19Aug '20Mar '22Sep '23Apr '25Nov '26 ₹500₹1,000₹1,500₹2,000Jan '19Dec '22Nov '26

52-week range ₹735.00 to ₹1533.60 · 1-year volatility 39.1%

Was the rally earned?

+2%share price, 1 yearRoughly flat
  • The share price was roughly flat over 1 year (+2%).
  • The share count barely moved.
Net profit growth: +57 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+57 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: −55 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−55 ptsP/E changeShare count change: 0 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.0 ptsShare count changeShare price: +2%+2%Share priceNet profit growth: +57 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+57ProfitP/E change: −55 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−55P/EShare count change: 0 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.0SharesShare price: +2%+2%Share price
Net profit growth+57 ptsNet profit rose about 76%, which lifts the price.
P/E change-55 ptsThe P/E fell from 123.3x to 71.3x, which lowers the price.
Share count change0 ptsShare count was little changed. More shares would count against the price.
-23%share price, 3 yearsEarnings-driven

Mostly earnings.

  • Per-share earnings took off 73 points, while the multiple moved less (P/E 40.2x to 71.3x).
  • The share count fell 30%.
Net profit growth: −105 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).−105 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: +50 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+50 ptsP/E changeShare count change: +31 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.+31 ptsShare count changeShare price: −23%−23%Share priceNet profit growth: −105 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).−105ProfitP/E change: +50 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+50P/EShare count change: +31 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.+31SharesShare price: −23%−23%Share price
Net profit growth-105 ptsNet profit fell about 70%, which lowers the price.
P/E change+50 ptsThe P/E rose from 40.2x to 71.3x, which lifts the price.
Share count change+31 ptsShare count fell 30%, which lifts the price.
What do "pts" mean?

"pts" are percentage points of the share price return. The parts add up to the total shown for each period. Because price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count, higher profit pushes the price up, a higher P/E pushes it up, and more shares push it down.

Example: if the price rose 34% and profit growth accounts for +58 pts while a lower P/E accounts for -24 pts, then 58 - 24 = 34. The +58 is not the profit growth rate itself: it is the part of the price move that profit growth explains.

Not shown for 5 years: earnings were negative at one end, or there is not enough history.

Net profit is trailing twelve months as reported with a 60-day lag.

Compare this with WELSPUN CORP

How rough has the ride been?

Maximum drawdown-65.8%not yet recovered
1-year volatility39.1%annualised
Beta vs sector index0.553-year daily, correlation 0.34
Volume spikes10last 90 sessions, 5x the 50-day median

Drawdown from peak

0%−20%−40%−60%2020202120222023202420252026−65.1% 0%−20%−40%−60%2020202220242026−65.1%
Largest drawdowns

-65.8% (2020-08 peak to 2026-06 low, not yet recovered)

-43.3% (2020-02 peak to 2020-03 low, recovered 2020-04)

-20.0% (2019-06 peak to 2019-07 low, recovered 2019-08)

Most recent volume spikes

2026-11-05: 5.2x the 50-day median, price -9.5% that day

2026-09-21: 6.9x the 50-day median, price +2.7% that day

2026-09-18: 9.4x the 50-day median, price +7.6% that day

Beta is the slope of daily returns against a market-cap-weighted index of the sector's other listed companies, built from today's constituents (so it excludes companies no longer listed).

Is it expensive against its own past and its peers?

71.3xP/E todayWithin its usual range
Against its own history43rd percentile
CheapestMedian 75.7xDearest

Usual range 38.8x to 101.1x since 2019-01.

Against Producer Manufacturing71.3x vs 29.6x
This company
71.3x
Sector median
29.6x

141% above the Producer Manufacturing median.

10.6x95.6x180.6x265.6xJan '19Aug '20Mar '22Oct '23May '25Nov '2610.6x95.6x180.6x265.6xJan '19Sep '21May '24Nov '26
P/E (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianProducer Manufacturing median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/B (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianProducer Manufacturing median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/S (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianProducer Manufacturing median
How to read this

Shaded band: 10th to 90th percentile of the company's own P/E history; dotted line: its median; orange line: sector median (companies with a positive multiple, at least 5 in the sector).

Sector figures are built from today's listed companies, so they exclude companies that are no longer listed.

All terms explained in the glossary →

How Producer Manufacturing is valued

Where does it rank among Producer Manufacturing peers?

Each cell is the company's percentile rank among its Producer Manufacturing peers (non-financial companies) that month.
Darker is better-ranked.
Rows marked ↓ are inverted (lower debt, shorter cash cycle and a lower P/E rank higher).

Where it ranks today

  • ROCE46th▲ 9 pts vs a year ago
  • Op. margin41st▼ 17 pts vs a year ago
  • Revenue growth49th▲ 31 pts vs a year ago
  • EPS growth86th▲ 78 pts vs a year ago
  • Debt/equity ↓14th▼ 3 pts vs a year ago
  • Cash cycle ↓58th▼ 4 pts vs a year ago
  • P/E ↓12th▲ 6 pts vs a year ago
  • 12M momentum58th▼ 3 pts vs a year ago

Rank history

ROCE
Op. margin
Revenue growth
EPS growth
Debt/equity ↓
Cash cycle ↓
P/E ↓
12M momentum
Dec '21Jul '22Jan '23Jul '23Jan '24Jul '24Jan '25Jul '25Jan '26Jul '26Nov '26
Lower rank Higher rank Not enough data

Percentiles use today's listed companies in the sector and need at least 5 peers with a value; grey cells have too few.
ROE is computed from net profit and book value where the source does not report it.

The Producer Manufacturing sector page Watch it move against Producer Manufacturing in the Observatory

What is the price implying?

~23%annual earnings growth implied by the priceAbove delivered growth

At normalised P/E (five-year average earnings) of 41.3x, a holder earning 12%/yr needs earnings to grow about 23.4%/yr for 10 years, then trade at 15x.

Delivered12.3%/yrEPS, last 10 fiscal years · 3-yr avg to 3-yr avg
Gap+11.1 ptsimplied minus delivered
Rank302ndmost demanding of 856

Over time

Implied growth by month (solid) and delivered growth (dashed).

0%19%38% Jan 2019Nov 2026 0%19%38% Jan 2019Nov 2026

Change the assumptions

Exit P/E / return11%12%13%
12x25.0%26.1%27.2%
15x22.3%23.4%24.5%
20x18.9%20.0%21.1%

Drag a slider to test other assumptions

Implied: 23.4%/yr

Looking back

  • Jan 2020Price implied 30%/yr; EPS has since grown 2%/yr (7.0 yrs)
  • Jan 2021Price implied 31%/yr; EPS has since grown −4%/yr (6.0 yrs)
  • Jan 2022Price implied 38%/yr; EPS has since grown −5%/yr (5.0 yrs)

Past comparisons cover only companies listed today (survivorship bias) and say nothing about future outcomes.

“Implied growth” is what the current price would require under our stated assumptions, not what we expect. How this is calculated and the market-wide lists.

What prices imply across Producer Manufacturing The market-wide Expectations lists

Key figures

Share Priceclose 9 Nov
₹1144.70
P/E
71.3x
ROCE
14.0%
Market Cap
₹5148 cr
Revenue (TTM)
₹3655 cr
P/S
1.4x
P/B
4.3x
ROE
6.0%
Operating Margin
10.0%
Debt / Equity
0.9x
Promoter Holding
25.2%
12M Momentum
1.9%

52-week range

₹735.00₹1533.60
51% of the way from its 52-week low to its high

Price risk

1Y volatility
39.1%
Beta vs sector
1-year daily
0.81

Balance sheet & cash

Interest cover
operating profit ÷ interest
2.1x
Cash from profit, 3Y
operating cash flow ÷ net profit
3.86x
Share count, 1Y
unchanged

Are profits backed by cash?

6 of 7checks within range1 near a threshold
Other income reliance-18%Within range

Other income as a share of pre-tax profit (trailing twelve months): -17.7%. Bands: below 15%, 15% to 35%, above 35%.

Tax rate40%Near threshold

Median quarterly effective tax rate over about 2.5 years: 40.0%. Bands: 15% to 35%, 5% to 15% or 35% to 50%, outside 5% to 50%.

Cash conversion3.86xWithin range

Operating cash flow divided by net profit over the last three fiscal years: 3.86x (cash from operations ₹1,051 cr, net profit ₹272 cr). Bands: 0.8x and above, 0.5x to 0.8x, below 0.5x.

Free cash flow5 of 5 yrsWithin range

Fiscal years with positive free cash flow in the last 5: 5. Bands: at least 80% of years, 40% to 80%, below 40%.

Receivable days vs history+2 daysWithin range

Debtor days are above the median of the previous three fiscal years by 2 days (48 vs 46). Bands: under 15 days, 15 to 45, over 45.

Capital work in progress1% of fixed assetsWithin range

Capital work-in-progress is 1% of fixed assets. Bands: not rising or up to 30%; rising for three years and above 30%; rising and above 60%.

Payable days+17 days / 2 yrsWithin range

Days payable changed by +17 over two years. Bands: rise of up to 30 days; more than 30 days.

Tap a check to see how it is measured

How to read this

Each check is a named rule with fixed thresholds, not a score. Annual statements are the latest restated figures, so a past year may differ from what was originally reported.

All terms explained in the glossary →

Who has been buying and selling?

  • Over 3 years, FIIs trimmed 12.1 pts; DIIs added 5.8 pts.
  • The number of shareholders fell from 1.2 lakh to 96,269 (-18%) between Sep 2023 and Jun 2026.

Holdings, Jun '26

How each group changed

GroupSep '23Jun '26Change
Promoters25.2%25.2%0.0 pts
FIIs26.5%14.4%-12.1 pts
DIIs12.6%18.4%+5.8 pts
Public and others35.8%42.0%+6.3 pts

Number of shareholders

96,269shareholders-18% since Sep '23
96k1.1L1.2L1.3L Sep '23Jun '24Mar '25Dec '25Jun '26
Sep '23: 1.2 lakh
Dec '23: 1.3 lakh
Mar '24: 1.3 lakh
Jun '24: 1.3 lakh
Sep '24: 1.2 lakh
Dec '24: 1.1 lakh
Mar '25: 1.1 lakh
Jun '25: 1.0 lakh
Sep '25: 98,599
Dec '25: 95,574
Mar '26: 96,506
Jun '26: 96,269
 96k1.1L1.2L1.3L Sep '23Sep '24Sep '25Jun '26
Sep '23: 1.2 lakh
Dec '23: 1.3 lakh
Mar '24: 1.3 lakh
Jun '24: 1.3 lakh
Sep '24: 1.2 lakh
Dec '24: 1.1 lakh
Mar '25: 1.1 lakh
Jun '25: 1.0 lakh
Sep '25: 98,599
Dec '25: 95,574
Mar '26: 96,506
Jun '26: 96,269

Quarterly shareholding as reported, labelled by the quarter it covers (it becomes visible about two months later).
Shareholder counts are only available for recent quarters.

This quarter's smart-money board

What happened next to similar setups

+3.9%typical 12-month return vs the marketNot meaningfully different from the base rate
  • We found 50 past situations where a non-financial company looked like GMM PFAUDLER LTD today on valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, price momentum, size and volatility.
  • Over the following 12 months the middle half of them returned −20% to +32% vs the market, against −4% for all non-financial companies in the same months.
  • The gap against the base rate (+7.7%, 80% range −1.5% to +12.9%) is within what chance and overlapping periods produce.

Where the 50 outcomes landed

−100%−50%0%+50%+100%
HINDWAREAP · Sep 2023: −59.5% vs market
CAMLINFINE · Jun 2023: −56.7% vs market
STYRENIX · Nov 2021: −46.8% vs market
SHK · Aug 2025: −43.5% vs market
KOKUYOCMLN · Sep 2024: −41.7% vs market
TVSSRICHAK · Nov 2023: −39.6% vs market
SIS · May 2020: −32.9% vs market
MAHLOG · Dec 2021: −28.9% vs market
HLEGLAS · May 2025: −26.5% vs market
SOMANYCERA · Feb 2022: −26.3% vs market
IFBIND · Sep 2021: −23.4% vs market
ALICON · Dec 2022: −22.9% vs market
MEDPLUS · Oct 2025: −19.7% vs market
EVEREADY · Sep 2023: −19.2% vs market
JINDWORLD · Jun 2020: −18.8% vs market
ORIENTCEM · Feb 2020: −15.3% vs market
JKCEMENT · Jul 2023: −8.6% vs market
HNDFDS · May 2025: −7.3% vs market
VMART · Jul 2025: −6.5% vs market
HATSUN · Jun 2025: −4.1% vs market
GREENLAM · Aug 2025: −3.7% vs market
GREENPLY · Oct 2025: −2.2% vs market
KEC · Jul 2023: −1.0% vs market
SUZLON · Mar 2022: −1.0% vs market
CENTURYPLY · Jul 2025: +3.7% vs market
MMFL · Nov 2021: +4.1% vs market
SUPRAJIT · Jul 2025: +4.4% vs market
VARROC · May 2025: +4.6% vs market
BANARISUG · Jun 2022: +5.8% vs market
PRSMJOHNSN · Jan 2020: +10.4% vs market
ASAHIINDIA · May 2020: +12.6% vs market
ARVINDFASN · Jul 2024: +15.6% vs market
JKLAKSHMI · Mar 2020: +22.9% vs market
WELSPUNLIV · Feb 2020: +23.1% vs market
SAGCEM · Nov 2020: +27.6% vs market
ASTERDM · Mar 2022: +28.4% vs market
THANGAMAYL · Jun 2022: +29.8% vs market
MINDACORP · Jul 2025: +33.2% vs market
DYNAMATECH · Nov 2023: +37.8% vs market
SOBHA · Dec 2023: +39.8% vs market
CRAFTSMAN · Apr 2022: +40.1% vs market
BRIGADE · Apr 2021: +47.1% vs market
PRIVISCL · Aug 2024: +63.2% vs market
UNOMINDA · Jul 2020: +65.5% vs market
TORNTPOWER · May 2023: +89.7% vs market
VRLLOG · Jul 2021: +90.8% vs market
AMBER · Jul 2024: +95.1% vs market
JBMA · Jul 2021: +106.1% vs market
RKFORGE · May 2022: +114.6% vs market
SCHNEIDER · Aug 2022: +137.7% vs market
Similar setups +3.9%All companies −3.8%← worse than the marketbetter than the market →

Each dot is one past situation (hover or tap for details) · Solid dots are the closest matches, listed below · Shaded is the middle half of all companies in the same months · 3 beyond the range shown, drawn at the edge

Similar setups' median
+3.9%
All companies' median
−3.8%
Beat the market
52% vs 46%

50 past situations · 50 companies · 33 months · 2020–2025

The closest matches

CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
ARVINDFASN
Retail Trade		 Jul 2024 85x14% +57%−6% +16%
PRSMJOHNSN
Non-Energy Minerals		 Jan 2020 30x13% −3%−32% +10%
EVEREADY
Producer Manufacturing		 Sep 2023 103x13% +23%−9% −19%
CAMLINFINE
Process Industries		 Jun 2023 54x10% +51%−7% −57%
SUPRAJIT
Producer Manufacturing		 Jul 2025 64x11% −12%−26% +4%
Show the other 3 matches
CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
VARROC
Producer Manufacturing		 May 2025 83x17% −5%−24% +5%
KEC
Industrial Services		 Jul 2023 93x12% +38%−6% −1%
VMART
Retail Trade		 Jul 2025 137x8% −8%−29% −7%
How reliable is this?

Matched on P/E, P/S, ROCE, operating margin, debt/equity, interest cover, revenue growth, 12-month momentum, drawdown from 12-month high, size and volatility. Closest on: 12-month momentum, P/S and size. One match per company and at most 7 from any one month.

Independent periods: the matches fall in 6 distinct 12-month windows. Matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, so fewer windows means less evidence.

How this is built

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to GMM PFAUDLER LTD. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

Methodology

How historical analogs are built

Data as of 2026-11-09. Outcome pool: Jan 2020 to Oct 2025.

For every company we look at the situation it is in today (valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, 12-month price momentum, drawdown, size and volatility) and find past company-months that looked most like it. We then show what happened to those past situations over the following 12 months, measured against the ApnaFunda All index and against the base rate. It describes history. It does not predict anything.

What is compared

FeatureWeightNon-financialFinancial
P/E1yesyes
P/S1yes—
P/B1—yes
ROCE1yes—
operating margin1yes—
ROE1—yes
debt/equity0.75yes—
interest cover0.5yes—
revenue growth0.75yesyes
12-month momentum1yesyes
drawdown from 12-month high0.75yesyes
size0.75yesyes
volatility0.5yesyes

Weights were set by judgement before any outcome was looked at and are never tuned on results. Loss-making companies (negative P/E or net profit) are only matched with other loss-making companies. Banks, NBFCs and insurers are compared only with each other and use a different feature set. Every feature is converted, month by month, to its rank among companies in the same pool in that month, so a P/E of 30 in a hot market and a P/E of 22 in a cold one can match if both were equally expensive for their time. Only that month's data is used.

How closeness and the sample are defined

Distance is the weighted root-mean-square gap between the standardised features both companies have. A match needs at least 70% of the query's feature weight, a distance of at most 0.9, and 30 matches at minimum to be shown. We keep up to 50 matches with these exclusions: never the company itself, one match per company (its closest month), and at most 7 from any one calendar month so a single market episode cannot dominate.

Base rate

The base rate is the distribution of 12-month returns, relative to the market, of every eligible company-month in the same pool, with each month weighted to match the months the analogs came from. It answers: how did a random company do in these same months? Because matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, we also report the number of distinct 12-month windows behind a result, and a bootstrap that resamples months decides whether the analog median differs from the base rate at all. "Not meaningfully different" is the usual outcome and the page copy is written for it.

Limits you should know

  • One market period. The outcome pool covers 2020–2025 only (70 months), including the 2020 crash and the 2020–21 rally.
  • Survivorship. Only companies listed today are included. Delisted and bankrupt companies are missing, which flatters past outcomes, particularly for distressed-looking setups.
  • Price return only. Dividends are excluded, and the benchmark is an ApnaFunda market-cap-weighted index of the same listed companies, not an official index.
  • Reporting lag. Fundamentals are matched on an assumed 60-day lag after the quarter end, not on real announcement dates.
  • Pools: non-financial: 98,395 company-months from 2019 companies; financial: 5,659 company-months from 108 companies. 2349 companies currently have a result; the rest are suppressed because too few comparable situations exist.

Does it work? A walk-forward check

The walk-forward check has not been run for this build, so skill is shown as not yet measured.

Disclaimer

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to any company shown. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

What else looks like this?

Companies with the most similar financial profile today, regardless of industry.

ARVINDARVIND
Process Industries
60%similar
operating marginvolatility
GREENLAM INDUSTRIESGREENLAM
Non-Energy Minerals
60%similar
operating marginmarket cap
AFCONS INFRASTRUCTUREAFCONS
Industrial Services
59%similar
ROCEoperating margin
TVS SUPPLY CHAIN SOLUTIONSTVSSCS
Transportation
58%similar
market caprevenue growth
TVS SRICHAKRATVSSRICHAK
Consumer Durables
57%similar
revenuevolatility
ION EXCHANGE (INDIA)IONEXCHANG
Producer Manufacturing
64%similar
ROCEpromoter holding
DYNAMATIC TECHNOLOGIESDYNAMATECH
Producer Manufacturing
62%similar
debt/equitymarket cap
RAMKRISHNA FORGINGSRKFORGE
Producer Manufacturing
56%similar
EPS growthvolatility

Similarity is statistical, based on reported metrics; it does not imply similar business quality or future returns.

What changed?

30 events since Mar '24

  1. NovPriceVolume reached 5.2x its 50-day median on 2026-11-05; price -9.5% that day.
  2. SepPeer rankMoved into the top quartile of Producer Manufacturing on EPS growth (from the 2nd quartile).
  3. AugPeer rankMoved into the 3rd quartile of Producer Manufacturing on operating margin (from the bottom quartile).
  4. AugPriceVolume reached 72.9x its 50-day median on 2026-08-06; price +14.3% that day.
  5. JunResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned positive.
  6. JunPriceFell 66% from the Aug 2020 peak to the Jun 2026 low.
  7. JunPeer rankSlipped to the bottom quartile of Producer Manufacturing on operating margin (from the 3rd quartile).
  8. MayPriceVolume reached 20.5x its 50-day median on 2026-05-29; price -2.6% that day.
Show 22 earlier events
  1. MarValuationP/E crossed above the 90th percentile of its own history to date (232.6x).
  2. MarPeer rankSlipped to the 3rd quartile of Producer Manufacturing on operating margin (from the 2nd quartile).
  3. FebPriceVolume reached 5.5x its 50-day median on 2026-02-09; price -2.9% that day.
  4. OctPriceVolume reached 21.1x its 50-day median on 2025-10-07; price +3.4% that day.
  5. SepPeer rankMoved into the 2nd quartile of Producer Manufacturing on operating margin (from the 3rd quartile).
  6. JulPriceVolume reached 5.8x its 50-day median on 2025-07-31; price +3.5% that day.
  7. JunValuationP/E crossed above the 90th percentile of its own history to date (101.0x).
  8. JunPeer rankSlipped to the 3rd quartile of Producer Manufacturing on ROCE (from the 2nd quartile).
  9. MayPriceVolume reached 10.3x its 50-day median on 2025-05-20; price +6.7% that day.
  10. JanPriceVolume reached 9.3x its 50-day median on 2025-01-10; price -0.1% that day.
  11. DecInstitutionsFII + DII holding fell 6.3 pts over 1 quarter to 30.4%.
  12. DecPeer rankMoved into the 2nd quartile of Producer Manufacturing on operating margin (from the 3rd quartile).
  13. NovValuationP/E fell below the 10th percentile of its own history to date (37.1x).
  14. NovPriceVolume reached 21.2x its 50-day median on 2024-11-25; price -0.3% that day.
  15. SepResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned negative.
  16. SepPeer rankSlipped to the bottom quartile of Producer Manufacturing on EPS growth (from the 3rd quartile).
  17. AugPriceVolume reached 58.9x its 50-day median on 2024-08-28; price +3.3% that day.
  18. JunResultsRevenue (TTM) reached a new high of ₹3,446 cr.
  19. JunPeer rankSlipped to the 3rd quartile of Producer Manufacturing on EPS growth (from the top quartile).
  20. JunDebtDebt / equity fell below 1.0x (0.94x).
  21. MayPriceVolume reached 9.2x its 50-day median on 2024-05-23; price -5.9% that day.
  22. MarInstitutionsFII + DII holding fell 3.4 pts over 1 quarter to 35.7%.

Events are generated from the data by fixed rules.
The month shown is when the change became visible in the reported figures, assuming a 60-day lag after each quarter end; it is not an announcement date.

Where price and fundamentals disagree, market-wide Rewind the whole market to any month

Monthly history95 months · 2019-01 to 2026-11
MonthP/ERevenue (TTM)ROEROCEDebt / Equity
2026-1171.3x₹3655 cr6.0%14.0%0.9x
2026-1075.7x₹3655 cr6.0%14.0%0.9x
2026-0991.3x₹3655 cr6.0%14.0%0.9x
2026-0878.9x₹3525 cr4.9%14.0%0.9x
2026-0765.4x₹3525 cr4.9%14.0%0.9x
2026-0659.7x₹3525 cr4.9%14.0%0.9x
2026-05224.8x₹3388 cr1.1%13.0%0.8x
2026-04265.6x₹3388 cr1.1%13.0%0.8x
2026-03232.6x₹3388 cr1.1%13.0%0.8x
2026-0262.5x₹3305 cr6.6%13.0%0.8x
2026-0165.3x₹3305 cr6.6%13.0%0.8x
2025-1273.9x₹3305 cr6.6%13.0%0.8x
2025-11123.3x₹3208 cr4.0%13.0%0.8x
2025-10141.5x₹3208 cr4.0%13.0%0.8x
2025-09116.3x₹3208 cr4.0%13.0%0.8x
2025-0899.9x₹3198 cr5.3%13.0%0.8x
2025-07119.0x₹3198 cr5.3%13.0%0.8x
2025-06101.0x₹3198 cr5.3%13.0%0.8x
2025-0547.3x₹3132 cr11.8%19.0%0.9x
2025-0442.9x₹3132 cr11.8%19.0%0.9x
2025-0342.4x₹3132 cr11.8%19.0%0.9x
2025-0252.4x₹3187 cr10.4%19.0%0.9x
2025-0156.3x₹3187 cr10.4%19.0%0.9x
2024-1255.8x₹3187 cr10.4%19.0%0.9x
2024-1137.1x₹3319 cr16.4%19.0%0.9x
2024-1042.5x₹3319 cr16.4%19.0%0.9x
2024-0943.4x₹3319 cr16.4%19.0%0.9x
2024-0835.1x₹3446 cr19.6%19.0%0.9x
2024-0737.0x₹3446 cr19.6%19.0%0.9x
2024-0633.8x₹3446 cr19.6%19.0%0.9x
2024-0533.3x₹3178 cr29.6%22.0%1.2x
2024-0438.6x₹3178 cr29.6%22.0%1.2x
2024-0333.3x₹3178 cr29.6%22.0%1.2x
2024-0235.1x₹3178 cr29.6%22.0%1.2x
2024-0141.9x₹3178 cr29.6%22.0%1.2x
2023-1243.5x₹3178 cr29.6%22.0%1.2x
2023-1140.2x₹3178 cr29.6%22.0%1.2x
2023-1046.8x₹3178 cr29.6%22.0%1.2x
2023-0950.3x₹3178 cr29.6%22.0%1.2x
2023-0842.6x₹3178 cr29.6%22.0%1.2x
2023-0739.8x₹3178 cr29.6%22.0%1.2x
2023-0639.9x₹3178 cr29.6%22.0%1.2x
2023-0575.9x₹2541 cr15.8%13.0%1.2x
2023-0476.5x₹2541 cr15.8%13.0%1.2x
2023-0375.7x₹2541 cr15.8%13.0%1.2x
2023-0284.3x₹2541 cr15.8%13.0%1.2x
2023-0184.8x₹2541 cr15.8%13.0%1.2x
2022-1280.9x₹2541 cr15.8%13.0%1.2x
2022-11100.8x₹2541 cr15.8%13.0%1.2x
2022-1095.3x₹2541 cr15.8%13.0%1.2x
2022-0999.6x₹2541 cr15.8%13.0%1.2x
2022-0885.7x₹2541 cr15.8%13.0%1.2x
2022-0782.6x₹2541 cr15.8%13.0%1.2x
2022-0674.8x₹2541 cr15.8%13.0%1.2x
2022-0583.5x₹1001 cr17.5%15.0%1.6x
2022-0490.2x₹1001 cr17.5%15.0%1.6x
2022-0390.8x₹1001 cr17.5%15.0%1.6x
2022-0287.1x₹1001 cr17.5%15.0%1.6x
2022-0199.5x₹1001 cr17.5%15.0%1.6x
2021-1296.9x₹1001 cr17.5%15.0%1.6x
2021-1189.2x₹1001 cr17.5%15.0%1.6x
2021-1092.9x₹1001 cr17.5%15.0%1.6x
2021-0988.0x₹1001 cr17.5%15.0%1.6x
2021-0884.4x₹1001 cr17.5%15.0%1.6x
2021-0791.6x₹1001 cr17.5%15.0%1.6x
2021-0693.3x₹1001 cr17.5%15.0%1.6x
2021-0598.7x₹591 cr24.0%31.0%0.1x
2021-0485.5x₹591 cr24.0%31.0%0.1x
2021-0388.6x₹591 cr24.0%31.0%0.1x
2021-0284.6x₹591 cr24.0%31.0%0.1x
2021-0173.5x₹591 cr24.0%31.0%0.1x
2020-1277.9x₹591 cr24.0%31.0%0.1x
2020-1178.5x₹591 cr24.0%31.0%0.1x
2020-1073.1x₹591 cr24.0%31.0%0.1x
2020-0982.0x₹591 cr24.0%31.0%0.1x
2020-08115.1x₹591 cr24.0%31.0%0.1x
2020-0783.9x₹591 cr24.0%31.0%0.1x
2020-0684.2x₹591 cr24.0%31.0%0.1x
2020-05110.2x₹503 cr21.1%29.0%0.0x
2020-04101.1x₹503 cr21.1%29.0%0.0x
2020-0372.7x₹503 cr21.1%29.0%0.0x
2020-0280.0x₹503 cr21.1%29.0%0.0x
2020-0172.4x₹503 cr21.1%29.0%0.0x
2019-1254.2x₹503 cr21.1%29.0%0.0x
2019-1147.8x₹503 cr21.1%29.0%0.0x
2019-1041.3x₹503 cr21.1%29.0%0.0x
2019-0943.3x₹503 cr21.1%29.0%0.0x
2019-0842.7x₹503 cr21.1%29.0%0.0x
2019-0734.7x₹503 cr21.1%29.0%0.0x
2019-0639.1x₹503 cr21.1%29.0%0.0x
2019-0543.4x₹406 cr21.0%29.0%0.0x
2019-0441.2x₹406 cr21.0%29.0%0.0x
2019-0341.5x₹406 cr21.0%29.0%0.0x
2019-0239.0x₹406 cr21.0%29.0%0.0x
2019-0137.6x₹406 cr21.0%29.0%0.0x

Methodology and data notes

Methodology

Methodology and data notes

All figures come from public exchange prices and screener.in financial statements. Quarterly and annual results are shown from 60 days after the period end, so a month never uses a result before it would plausibly have been published. Statements are the latest versions, which may include later restatements.

Sector medians, percentiles and indices use today's listed companies in the sector (survivorship bias). Prices are adjusted for splits and bonus issues; around a corporate action the fundamentals may lag the price by up to a month, and affected sections are hidden.

The return decomposition uses price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count. The reverse DCF uses a fixed 12% cost of equity, a 10-year horizon and a 15x terminal P/E, and is an illustration only. Events, flags and twins follow fixed rules and thresholds described next to each section.

Feedback