अApnaFunda

ION EXCHANGE (INDIA) LTD (IONEXCHANG)

Producer Manufacturing · Industrial Machinery · figures to Nov '26

Quality scoreHow the business itself ranks against its sector peers on profitability, 3-year growth and leverage. 50 is the middle of the sector.39 / 100
Profitability 29Growth 34Balance sheet 52
Momentum scoreHow strong the recent trend is: 3-month price change, 12-month improvement in earnings and the rise in FII + DII holding, among companies above ₹500 cr.35 / 100
Price 21Earnings 9FII/DII 77

Share price

Closing priceAdjusted for splits and bonus issues.

₹321.8 latest close · −23.1% over the last 90 sessions

₹300₹350₹400₹450Jul 3Jul 29Aug 24Sep 17Oct 14Nov 9 ₹300₹350₹400₹450Jul 3Sep 4Nov 9

₹321.8 month-end · −8.2% over 12 months

₹350₹400Nov '25Jan '26Apr '26Jun '26Sep '26Nov '26 ₹350₹400Nov '25May '26Nov '26

₹321.8 month-end · −44.8% over 3 years

₹400₹600Nov '23Jun '24Jan '25Sep '25Apr '26Nov '26 ₹400₹600Nov '23May '25Nov '26

₹321.8 month-end · +75.7% since Feb '22

₹200₹400₹600Feb '22Jan '23Jan '24Dec '24Dec '25Nov '26 ₹200₹400₹600Feb '22Jul '24Nov '26

52-week range ₹295.00 to ₹486.00 · 1-year volatility 42.1%

Was the rally earned?

-8%share price, 1 yearEarnings-driven

Mostly earnings.

  • Per-share earnings took off 74 points, while the multiple moved less (P/E 24.3x to 48.1x).
  • The share count barely moved.
Net profit growth: −74 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).−74 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: +65 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+65 ptsP/E changeShare count change: 0 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.0 ptsShare count changeShare price: −8%−8%Share priceNet profit growth: −74 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).−74ProfitP/E change: +65 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+65P/EShare count change: 0 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.0SharesShare price: −8%−8%Share price
Net profit growth-74 ptsNet profit fell about 54%, which lowers the price.
P/E change+65 ptsThe P/E rose from 24.3x to 48.1x, which lifts the price.
Share count change0 ptsShare count was little changed. More shares would count against the price.
-45%share price, 3 yearsEarnings-driven

Mostly earnings.

  • Per-share earnings took off 52 points, while the multiple moved less (P/E 43.5x to 48.1x).
  • The share count barely moved.
Net profit growth: −52 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).−52 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: +8 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+8 ptsP/E changeShare count change: −1 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−1 ptsShare count changeShare price: −45%−45%Share priceNet profit growth: −52 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).−52ProfitP/E change: +8 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+8P/EShare count change: −1 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−1SharesShare price: −45%−45%Share price
Net profit growth-52 ptsNet profit fell about 50%, which lowers the price.
P/E change+8 ptsThe P/E rose from 43.5x to 48.1x, which lifts the price.
Share count change-1 ptsShare count was little changed. More shares would count against the price.
What do "pts" mean?

"pts" are percentage points of the share price return. The parts add up to the total shown for each period. Because price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count, higher profit pushes the price up, a higher P/E pushes it up, and more shares push it down.

Example: if the price rose 34% and profit growth accounts for +58 pts while a lower P/E accounts for -24 pts, then 58 - 24 = 34. The +58 is not the profit growth rate itself: it is the part of the price move that profit growth explains.

Not shown for 5 years: earnings were negative at one end, or there is not enough history.

Net profit is trailing twelve months as reported with a 60-day lag.

Compare this with WELSPUN CORP

How rough has the ride been?

Maximum drawdown-58.5%not yet recovered
1-year volatility42.1%annualised
Beta vs sector index0.873-year daily, correlation 0.44
Volume spikes5last 90 sessions, 5x the 50-day median

Drawdown from peak

0%−20%−40%−60%2023202420252026−58.5% 0%−20%−40%−60%2023202420252026−58.5%
Largest drawdowns

-58.5% (2024-07 peak to 2026-11 low, not yet recovered)

-32.7% (2023-10 peak to 2024-03 low, recovered 2024-07)

-23.8% (2023-07 peak to 2023-08 low, recovered 2023-10)

Most recent volume spikes

2026-11-04: 13.2x the 50-day median, price -7.3% that day

2026-09-07: 14.9x the 50-day median, price +7.3% that day

2026-08-06: 5.3x the 50-day median, price -7.0% that day

Beta is the slope of daily returns against a market-cap-weighted index of the sector's other listed companies, built from today's constituents (so it excludes companies no longer listed).

Is it expensive against its own past and its peers?

48.1xP/E todayNear its historic high
Against its own history91st percentile
CheapestMedian 33.8xDearest

Usual range 18.8x to 47.2x since 2022-02.

Against Producer Manufacturing48.1x vs 29.6x
This company
48.1x
Sector median
29.6x

63% above the Producer Manufacturing median.

15.8x31.0x46.2x61.5xFeb '22Feb '23Feb '24Feb '25Feb '26Nov '2615.8x31.0x46.2x61.5xFeb '22Sep '23Apr '25Nov '26
P/E (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianProducer Manufacturing median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/B (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianProducer Manufacturing median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/S (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianProducer Manufacturing median
How to read this

Shaded band: 10th to 90th percentile of the company's own P/E history; dotted line: its median; orange line: sector median (companies with a positive multiple, at least 5 in the sector).

Sector figures are built from today's listed companies, so they exclude companies that are no longer listed.

All terms explained in the glossary →

How Producer Manufacturing is valued

Where does it rank among Producer Manufacturing peers?

Each cell is the company's percentile rank among its Producer Manufacturing peers (non-financial companies) that month.
Darker is better-ranked.
Rows marked ↓ are inverted (lower debt, shorter cash cycle and a lower P/E rank higher).

Where it ranks today

  • ROCE46th▼ 27 pts vs a year ago
  • Op. margin13th▼ 32 pts vs a year ago
  • Revenue growth38th▼ 22 pts vs a year ago
  • EPS growth10th▼ 39 pts vs a year ago
  • Debt/equity ↓40th▼ 8 pts vs a year ago
  • Cash cycle ↓79thflat vs a year ago
  • P/E ↓26th▼ 40 pts vs a year ago
  • 12M momentum47th▲ 39 pts vs a year ago

Rank history

ROCE
Op. margin
Revenue growth
EPS growth
Debt/equity ↓
Cash cycle ↓
P/E ↓
12M momentum
Dec '21Jul '22Jan '23Jul '23Jan '24Jul '24Jan '25Jul '25Jan '26Jul '26Nov '26
Lower rank Higher rank Not enough data

Percentiles use today's listed companies in the sector and need at least 5 peers with a value; grey cells have too few.
ROE is computed from net profit and book value where the source does not report it.

The Producer Manufacturing sector page Watch it move against Producer Manufacturing in the Observatory

What is the price implying?

~18%annual earnings growth implied by the priceBelow delivered growth

At normalised P/E (five-year average earnings) of 26.1x, a holder earning 12%/yr needs earnings to grow about 17.7%/yr for 10 years, then trade at 15x.

Delivered22.1%/yrEPS, last 10 fiscal years · 3-yr avg to 3-yr avg
Gap−4.4 ptsimplied minus delivered
Rank620thmost demanding of 856

Over time

Implied growth by month (solid) and delivered growth (dashed).

0%27%54% Jun 2020Nov 2026 0%27%54% Jun 2020Nov 2026

Change the assumptions

Exit P/E / return11%12%13%
12x19.2%20.3%21.4%
15x16.7%17.7%18.8%
20x13.5%14.5%15.5%

Drag a slider to test other assumptions

Implied: 17.7%/yr

“Implied growth” is what the current price would require under our stated assumptions, not what we expect. How this is calculated and the market-wide lists.

What prices imply across Producer Manufacturing The market-wide Expectations lists

Key figures

Share Priceclose 9 Nov
₹321.80
P/E
48.1x
ROCE
14.0%
Market Cap
₹4725 cr
Revenue (TTM)
₹3032 cr
P/S
1.6x
P/B
3.5x
ROE
7.3%
Operating Margin
4.5%
Debt / Equity
0.4x
Promoter Holding
25.4%
12M Momentum
-8.2%

52-week range

₹295.00₹486.00
14% of the way from its 52-week low to its high

Price risk

1Y volatility
42.1%
Beta vs sector
1-year daily
0.83

Balance sheet & cash

Interest cover
operating profit ÷ interest
5.5x
Cash from profit, 3Y
operating cash flow ÷ net profit
0.25x
low
Share count, 1Y
unchanged

Are profits backed by cash?

4 of 7checks within range2 beyond a threshold
Other income reliance44%Beyond threshold

Other income as a share of pre-tax profit (trailing twelve months): 43.8%. Bands: below 15%, 15% to 35%, above 35%.

Tax rate26%Within range

Median quarterly effective tax rate over about 2.5 years: 26.5%. Bands: 15% to 35%, 5% to 15% or 35% to 50%, outside 5% to 50%.

Cash conversion0.25xBeyond threshold

Operating cash flow divided by net profit over the last three fiscal years: 0.25x (cash from operations ₹134 cr, net profit ₹546 cr). Bands: 0.8x and above, 0.5x to 0.8x, below 0.5x.

Free cash flow3 of 5 yrsNear threshold

Fiscal years with positive free cash flow in the last 5: 3. Bands: at least 80% of years, 40% to 80%, below 40%.

Receivable days vs history-10 daysWithin range

Debtor days are below the median of the previous three fiscal years by 10 days (135 vs 145). Bands: under 15 days, 15 to 45, over 45.

Capital work in progress23% of fixed assetsWithin range

Capital work-in-progress is 23% of fixed assets. Bands: not rising or up to 30%; rising for three years and above 30%; rising and above 60%.

Payable days+3 days / 2 yrsWithin range

Days payable changed by +3 over two years. Bands: rise of up to 30 days; more than 30 days.

Tap a check to see how it is measured

How to read this

Each check is a named rule with fixed thresholds, not a score. Annual statements are the latest restated figures, so a past year may differ from what was originally reported.

All terms explained in the glossary →

Who has been buying and selling?

  • Over 3 years, DIIs added 3.4 pts; promoters trimmed 1.3 pts; FIIs added 0.9 pts.
  • The number of shareholders rose from 62,689 to 1.2 lakh (+92%) between Sep 2023 and Jun 2026.

Holdings, Jun '26

How each group changed

GroupSep '23Jun '26Change
Promoters26.8%25.4%-1.3 pts
FIIs3.9%4.9%+0.9 pts
DIIs11.9%15.3%+3.4 pts
Public and others41.2%38.2%-3.0 pts

Number of shareholders

1.2 lakhshareholders+92% since Sep '23
63k85k1.1L1.3L Sep '23Jun '24Mar '25Dec '25Jun '26
Sep '23: 62,689
Dec '23: 71,507
Mar '24: 75,497
Jun '24: 87,586
Sep '24: 1.2 lakh
Dec '24: 1.2 lakh
Mar '25: 1.3 lakh
Jun '25: 1.3 lakh
Sep '25: 1.2 lakh
Dec '25: 1.2 lakh
Mar '26: 1.2 lakh
Jun '26: 1.2 lakh
63k85k1.1L1.3L Sep '23Sep '24Sep '25Jun '26
Sep '23: 62,689
Dec '23: 71,507
Mar '24: 75,497
Jun '24: 87,586
Sep '24: 1.2 lakh
Dec '24: 1.2 lakh
Mar '25: 1.3 lakh
Jun '25: 1.3 lakh
Sep '25: 1.2 lakh
Dec '25: 1.2 lakh
Mar '26: 1.2 lakh
Jun '26: 1.2 lakh

Quarterly shareholding as reported, labelled by the quarter it covers (it becomes visible about two months later).
Shareholder counts are only available for recent quarters.

This quarter's smart-money board

What happened next to similar setups

−9.6%typical 12-month return vs the marketNot meaningfully different from the base rate
  • We found 50 past situations where a non-financial company looked like ION EXCHANGE (INDIA) LTD today on valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, price momentum, size and volatility.
  • Over the following 12 months the middle half of them returned −21% to +43% vs the market, against 0% for all non-financial companies in the same months.
  • The gap against the base rate (−9.3%, 80% range −13.8% to +10.3%) is within what chance and overlapping periods produce.

Where the 50 outcomes landed

−50%0%+50%+100%
CAMLINFINE · Jul 2023: −47.5% vs market
CARYSIL · Apr 2024: −36.8% vs market
HERITGFOOD · Feb 2020: −35.7% vs market
AARTIDRUGS · Sep 2023: −34.8% vs market
TVSSRICHAK · Dec 2023: −33.9% vs market
DCXINDIA · Apr 2025: −33.6% vs market
VTL · Mar 2022: −29.1% vs market
RKFORGE · Jul 2024: −27.9% vs market
KOKUYOCMLN · Feb 2020: −24.9% vs market
IFBIND · Sep 2021: −23.4% vs market
MAHLOG · May 2021: −22.5% vs market
ALICON · Feb 2023: −21.4% vs market
SOMANYCERA · Mar 2022: −20.6% vs market
SHALBY · Mar 2024: −20.5% vs market
ORIENTELEC · Nov 2024: −20.2% vs market
JINDWORLD · Jun 2020: −18.8% vs market
HFCL · Mar 2024: −16.8% vs market
THEJO · Jan 2024: −15.7% vs market
LXCHEM · Sep 2025: −14.6% vs market
JTEKTINDIA · Feb 2020: −14.3% vs market
EPL · Aug 2023: −13.9% vs market
GREENLAM · Aug 2023: −13.3% vs market
HUHTAMAKI · Jun 2020: −11.7% vs market
STYRENIX · Feb 2021: −9.7% vs market
SUBROS · Apr 2021: −9.7% vs market
BAJAJELEC · Jan 2022: −9.6% vs market
SHK · Dec 2020: −4.7% vs market
GREENPLY · Aug 2021: −1.7% vs market
KCP · Mar 2024: +11.8% vs market
ORIENTCEM · Sep 2023: +12.2% vs market
SUPRAJIT · May 2021: +17.3% vs market
GAEL · Feb 2020: +17.5% vs market
WELSPUNLIV · Feb 2020: +23.1% vs market
CENTURYPLY · Jan 2020: +30.0% vs market
SAGCEM · Jan 2021: +34.6% vs market
BEML · Sep 2022: +34.7% vs market
OPTIEMUS · Oct 2025: +42.9% vs market
UNOMINDA · Jun 2020: +42.9% vs market
GTPL · Feb 2020: +46.0% vs market
HSCL · Apr 2022: +51.5% vs market
RUPA · Oct 2020: +54.8% vs market
AVALON · Apr 2024: +63.8% vs market
ELGIEQUIP · Mar 2022: +65.1% vs market
MINDACORP · Aug 2021: +76.1% vs market
ASTRAMICRO · Mar 2023: +78.6% vs market
VRLLOG · Jul 2021: +90.8% vs market
DOLLAR · Mar 2021: +93.3% vs market
HINDWAREAP · Dec 2020: +95.5% vs market
HIKAL · Dec 2020: +136.5% vs market
TRIDENT · Jun 2021: +136.5% vs market
Similar setups −9.6%All companies −0.3%← worse than the marketbetter than the market →

Each dot is one past situation (hover or tap for details) · Solid dots are the closest matches, listed below · Shaded is the middle half of all companies in the same months · 2 beyond the range shown, drawn at the edge

Similar setups' median
−9.6%
All companies' median
−0.3%
Beat the market
44% vs 50%

50 past situations · 50 companies · 32 months · 2020–2025

The closest matches

CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
BAJAJELEC
Consumer Durables
Jan 2022 48x12% +65%−22% −10%
BEML
Producer Manufacturing
Sep 2022 48x9% +3%−28% +35%
IFBIND
Consumer Durables
Sep 2021 75x13% +98%−16% −23%
HERITGFOOD
Consumer Non-Durables
Feb 2020 21x14% −21%−35% −36%
SAGCEM
Non-Energy Minerals
Jan 2021 54x8% +22%−19% +35%
Show the other 3 matches
CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
SOMANYCERA
Producer Manufacturing
Mar 2022 48x12% +52%−31% −21%
MINDACORP
Producer Manufacturing
Aug 2021 54x10% +63%−18% +76%
GREENLAM
Non-Energy Minerals
Aug 2023 43x14% +28%−10% −13%
How reliable is this?

Matched on P/E, P/S, ROCE, operating margin, debt/equity, interest cover, revenue growth, 12-month momentum, drawdown from 12-month high, size and volatility. Closest on: 12-month momentum, P/S and size. One match per company and at most 7 from any one month.

Independent periods: the matches fall in 6 distinct 12-month windows. Matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, so fewer windows means less evidence.

How this is built

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to ION EXCHANGE (INDIA) LTD. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

Methodology

How historical analogs are built

Data as of 2026-11-09. Outcome pool: Jan 2020 to Oct 2025.

For every company we look at the situation it is in today (valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, 12-month price momentum, drawdown, size and volatility) and find past company-months that looked most like it. We then show what happened to those past situations over the following 12 months, measured against the ApnaFunda All index and against the base rate. It describes history. It does not predict anything.

What is compared

FeatureWeightNon-financialFinancial
P/E1yesyes
P/S1yes—
P/B1—yes
ROCE1yes—
operating margin1yes—
ROE1—yes
debt/equity0.75yes—
interest cover0.5yes—
revenue growth0.75yesyes
12-month momentum1yesyes
drawdown from 12-month high0.75yesyes
size0.75yesyes
volatility0.5yesyes

Weights were set by judgement before any outcome was looked at and are never tuned on results. Loss-making companies (negative P/E or net profit) are only matched with other loss-making companies. Banks, NBFCs and insurers are compared only with each other and use a different feature set. Every feature is converted, month by month, to its rank among companies in the same pool in that month, so a P/E of 30 in a hot market and a P/E of 22 in a cold one can match if both were equally expensive for their time. Only that month's data is used.

How closeness and the sample are defined

Distance is the weighted root-mean-square gap between the standardised features both companies have. A match needs at least 70% of the query's feature weight, a distance of at most 0.9, and 30 matches at minimum to be shown. We keep up to 50 matches with these exclusions: never the company itself, one match per company (its closest month), and at most 7 from any one calendar month so a single market episode cannot dominate.

Base rate

The base rate is the distribution of 12-month returns, relative to the market, of every eligible company-month in the same pool, with each month weighted to match the months the analogs came from. It answers: how did a random company do in these same months? Because matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, we also report the number of distinct 12-month windows behind a result, and a bootstrap that resamples months decides whether the analog median differs from the base rate at all. "Not meaningfully different" is the usual outcome and the page copy is written for it.

Limits you should know

  • One market period. The outcome pool covers 2020–2025 only (70 months), including the 2020 crash and the 2020–21 rally.
  • Survivorship. Only companies listed today are included. Delisted and bankrupt companies are missing, which flatters past outcomes, particularly for distressed-looking setups.
  • Price return only. Dividends are excluded, and the benchmark is an ApnaFunda market-cap-weighted index of the same listed companies, not an official index.
  • Reporting lag. Fundamentals are matched on an assumed 60-day lag after the quarter end, not on real announcement dates.
  • Pools: non-financial: 98,395 company-months from 2019 companies; financial: 5,659 company-months from 108 companies. 2349 companies currently have a result; the rest are suppressed because too few comparable situations exist.

Does it work? A walk-forward check

The walk-forward check has not been run for this build, so skill is shown as not yet measured.

Disclaimer

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to any company shown. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

What else looks like this?

Companies with the most similar financial profile today, regardless of industry.

Consumer Non-Durables
59%similar
EPS growthP/E
Non-Energy Minerals
59%similar
revenuemarket cap
Non-Energy Minerals
59%similar
revenuedebt/equity
TVS SRICHAKRATVSSRICHAK
Consumer Durables
59%similar
revenuevolatility
Retail Trade
58%similar
revenue growthEPS growth
GMM PFAUDLERGMMPFAUDLR
Producer Manufacturing
64%similar
ROCEpromoter holding
Producer Manufacturing
62%similar
ROCErevenue
Producer Manufacturing
57%similar
volatilityEPS growth

Similarity is statistical, based on reported metrics; it does not imply similar business quality or future returns.

What changed?

30 events since Jun '22

  1. NovPriceFell 58% from the Jul 2024 peak to the Nov 2026 low.
  2. NovPriceVolume reached 13.2x its 50-day median on 2026-11-04; price -7.3% that day.
  3. SepValuationP/E crossed above the 90th percentile of its own history to date (61.5x).
  4. JulPriceVolume reached 43.3x its 50-day median on 2026-07-10; price +16.4% that day.
  5. JunPeer rankSlipped to the 3rd quartile of Producer Manufacturing on ROCE (from the 2nd quartile).
  6. JunPriceVolume reached 10.5x its 50-day median on 2026-06-22; price +5.5% that day.
  7. MarPriceVolume reached 19.6x its 50-day median on 2026-03-11; price +6.9% that day.
  8. DecResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned negative.
Show 22 earlier events
  1. DecPriceVolume reached 73.4x its 50-day median on 2025-12-16; price +3.7% that day.
  2. AugPeer rankSlipped to the 2nd quartile of Producer Manufacturing on ROCE (from the top quartile).
  3. JulPriceVolume reached 17.0x its 50-day median on 2025-07-23; price -9.9% that day.
  4. DecPeer rankSlipped to the 3rd quartile of Producer Manufacturing on operating margin (from the 2nd quartile).
  5. DecPriceVolume reached 6.9x its 50-day median on 2024-12-05; price +4.2% that day.
  6. SepResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned positive.
  7. SepPeer rankMoved into the 2nd quartile of Producer Manufacturing on operating margin (from the 3rd quartile).
  8. JulPriceRegained the 2023-10 peak, 4 months after the low.
  9. JulPriceVolume reached 32.2x its 50-day median on 2024-07-01; price +15.5% that day.
  10. JunResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned negative.
  11. JunPeer rankSlipped to the 3rd quartile of Producer Manufacturing on EPS growth (from the 2nd quartile).
  12. JunPriceVolume reached 11.1x its 50-day median on 2024-06-26; price +8.1% that day.
  13. AprValuationP/E crossed above the 90th percentile of its own history to date (42.3x).
  14. MarPriceFell 33% from the Oct 2023 peak to the Mar 2024 low.
  15. OctPriceVolume reached 7.5x its 50-day median on 2023-10-20; price +7.7% that day.
  16. SepPriceVolume reached 8.1x its 50-day median on 2023-09-15; price -1.8% that day.
  17. JulPeer rankMoved into the 2nd quartile of Producer Manufacturing on EPS growth (from the 3rd quartile).
  18. JunResultsRevenue (TTM) reached a new high of ₹1,990 cr.
  19. FebPriceVolume reached 11.9x its 50-day median on 2023-02-10; price +9.3% that day.
  20. NovPriceVolume reached 6.9x its 50-day median on 2022-11-10; price +7.2% that day.
  21. SepPriceVolume reached 9.1x its 50-day median on 2022-09-01; price +4.9% that day.
  22. JunPriceVolume reached 6.6x its 50-day median on 2022-06-03; price +6.5% that day.

Events are generated from the data by fixed rules.
The month shown is when the change became visible in the reported figures, assuming a 60-day lag after each quarter end; it is not an announcement date.

Where price and fundamentals disagree, market-wide Rewind the whole market to any month

Monthly history58 months · 2022-02 to 2026-11
MonthP/ERevenue (TTM)ROEROCEDebt / Equity
2026-1148.1x₹3032 cr7.3%14.0%0.4x
2026-1050.6x₹3032 cr7.3%14.0%0.4x
2026-0961.5x₹3032 cr7.3%14.0%0.4x
2026-0837.4x₹2915 cr10.7%14.0%0.4x
2026-0743.2x₹2915 cr10.7%14.0%0.4x
2026-0642.0x₹2915 cr10.7%14.0%0.4x
2026-0529.2x₹2886 cr15.1%22.0%0.3x
2026-0432.0x₹2886 cr15.1%22.0%0.3x
2026-0325.8x₹2886 cr15.1%22.0%0.3x
2026-0225.4x₹2842 cr17.5%22.0%0.3x
2026-0124.7x₹2842 cr17.5%22.0%0.3x
2025-1226.6x₹2842 cr17.5%22.0%0.3x
2025-1124.3x₹2753 cr17.5%22.0%0.3x
2025-1027.8x₹2753 cr17.5%22.0%0.3x
2025-0928.0x₹2753 cr17.5%22.0%0.3x
2025-0829.5x₹2737 cr17.2%22.0%0.3x
2025-0732.8x₹2737 cr17.2%22.0%0.3x
2025-0638.3x₹2737 cr17.2%22.0%0.3x
2025-0536.7x₹2684 cr21.4%27.0%0.1x
2025-0433.7x₹2684 cr21.4%27.0%0.1x
2025-0331.5x₹2684 cr21.4%27.0%0.1x
2025-0233.9x₹2548 cr21.1%27.0%0.1x
2025-0139.5x₹2548 cr21.1%27.0%0.1x
2024-1244.6x₹2548 cr21.1%27.0%0.1x
2024-1146.8x₹2436 cr20.3%27.0%0.1x
2024-1049.5x₹2436 cr20.3%27.0%0.1x
2024-0945.1x₹2436 cr20.3%27.0%0.1x
2024-0848.5x₹2348 cr19.2%27.0%0.1x
2024-0752.0x₹2348 cr19.2%27.0%0.1x
2024-0643.0x₹2348 cr19.2%27.0%0.1x
2024-0538.0x₹1990 cr23.4%34.0%0.1x
2024-0442.3x₹1990 cr23.4%34.0%0.1x
2024-0337.8x₹1990 cr23.4%34.0%0.1x
2024-0236.1x₹1990 cr23.4%34.0%0.1x
2024-0138.0x₹1990 cr23.4%34.0%0.1x
2023-1241.9x₹1990 cr23.4%34.0%0.1x
2023-1143.5x₹1990 cr23.4%34.0%0.1x
2023-1039.7x₹1990 cr23.4%34.0%0.1x
2023-0938.6x₹1990 cr23.4%34.0%0.1x
2023-0842.3x₹1990 cr23.4%34.0%0.1x
2023-0739.5x₹1990 cr23.4%34.0%0.1x
2023-0630.8x₹1990 cr23.4%34.0%0.1x
2023-0534.4x₹1577 cr24.7%36.0%0.1x
2023-0429.6x₹1577 cr24.7%36.0%0.1x
2023-0330.8x₹1577 cr24.7%36.0%0.1x
2023-0230.4x₹1577 cr24.7%36.0%0.1x
2023-0123.6x₹1577 cr24.7%36.0%0.1x
2022-1224.9x₹1577 cr24.7%36.0%0.1x
2022-1124.5x₹1577 cr24.7%36.0%0.1x
2022-1018.8x₹1577 cr24.7%36.0%0.1x
2022-0919.4x₹1577 cr24.7%36.0%0.1x
2022-0817.3x₹1577 cr24.7%36.0%0.1x
2022-0716.4x₹1577 cr24.7%36.0%0.1x
2022-0615.8x₹1577 cr24.7%36.0%0.1x
2022-0518.9x₹1450 cr28.3%40.0%0.1x
2022-0417.4x₹1450 cr28.3%40.0%0.1x
2022-0317.0x₹1450 cr28.3%40.0%0.1x
2022-0218.7x₹1450 cr28.3%40.0%0.1x

Methodology and data notes

Methodology

Methodology and data notes

All figures come from public exchange prices and screener.in financial statements. Quarterly and annual results are shown from 60 days after the period end, so a month never uses a result before it would plausibly have been published. Statements are the latest versions, which may include later restatements.

Sector medians, percentiles and indices use today's listed companies in the sector (survivorship bias). Prices are adjusted for splits and bonus issues; around a corporate action the fundamentals may lag the price by up to a month, and affected sections are hidden.

The return decomposition uses price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count. The reverse DCF uses a fixed 12% cost of equity, a 10-year horizon and a 15x terminal P/E, and is an illustration only. Events, flags and twins follow fixed rules and thresholds described next to each section.

Feedback