अApnaFunda

MSP STEEL & POWER LIMITED (MSPL)

Non-Energy Minerals · Steel · figures to Nov '26

Quality scoreHow the business itself ranks against its sector peers on profitability, 3-year growth and leverage. 50 is the middle of the sector.49 / 100
Profitability 38Growth 51Balance sheet 58
Momentum scoreHow strong the recent trend is: 3-month price change, 12-month improvement in earnings and the rise in FII + DII holding, among companies above ₹500 cr.52 / 100
Price 32Earnings 67FII/DII 57

Share price

Closing priceAdjusted for splits and bonus issues.

₹31.19 latest close · −27.1% over the last 90 sessions

₹30₹35₹40Jul 3Jul 29Aug 24Sep 17Oct 14Nov 9 ₹30₹35₹40Jul 3Sep 4Nov 9

₹31.19 month-end · −15.2% over 12 months

₹25₹30₹35₹40Nov '25Jan '26Apr '26Jun '26Sep '26Nov '26 ₹25₹30₹35₹40Nov '25May '26Nov '26

₹31.19 month-end · +41.1% over 3 years

₹20₹30₹40₹50Nov '23Jun '24Jan '25Sep '25Apr '26Nov '26 ₹20₹30₹40₹50Nov '23May '25Nov '26

₹31.19 month-end · +170.0% since Jan '19

₹0₹20₹40Jan '19Aug '20Mar '22Sep '23Apr '25Nov '26 ₹0₹20₹40Jan '19Dec '22Nov '26

52-week range ₹26.25 to ₹46.12 · 1-year volatility 40.5%

Was the rally earned?

+249%share price, 5 yearsLower P/E held it back

Mostly yes, with a catch.

  • Per-share earnings added 326 points, but investors now pay less per rupee of profit (P/E 68.8x to 46.6x), which took 78 points back.
  • The share count rose 48%.
Net profit growth: +404 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+404 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: −78 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−78 ptsP/E changeShare count change: −77 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−77 ptsShare count changeShare price: +249%+249%Share priceNet profit growth: +404 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+404ProfitP/E change: −78 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−78P/EShare count change: −77 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−77SharesShare price: +249%+249%Share price
Net profit growth+404 ptsNet profit rose about 660%, which lifts the price.
P/E change-78 ptsThe P/E fell from 68.8x to 46.6x, which lowers the price.
Share count change-77 ptsShare count rose 48%, which lowers the price.
What do "pts" mean?

"pts" are percentage points of the share price return. The parts add up to the total shown for each period. Because price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count, higher profit pushes the price up, a higher P/E pushes it up, and more shares push it down.

Example: if the price rose 34% and profit growth accounts for +58 pts while a lower P/E accounts for -24 pts, then 58 - 24 = 34. The +58 is not the profit growth rate itself: it is the part of the price move that profit growth explains.

Not shown for 1 year and 3 years: earnings were negative at one end, or there is not enough history.

Net profit is trailing twelve months as reported with a 60-day lag.

Compare this with JSW STEEL

How rough has the ride been?

Maximum drawdown-77.3%recovered 2021-12
1-year volatility40.5%annualised
Beta vs sector index0.873-year daily, correlation 0.39
Volume spikes0last 90 sessions, 5x the 50-day median

Drawdown from peak

0%−25%−50%−75%2020202120222023202420252026−76.4% 0%−25%−50%−75%2020202220242026−76.4%
Largest drawdowns

-77.3% (2019-03 peak to 2020-05 low, recovered 2021-12)

-64.4% (2024-09 peak to 2025-03 low, not yet recovered)

-57.2% (2022-01 peak to 2023-03 low, recovered 2023-10)

Beta is the slope of daily returns against a market-cap-weighted index of the sector's other listed companies, built from today's constituents (so it excludes companies no longer listed).

Is it expensive against its own past and its peers?

46.5xP/E todayWithin its usual range
Against its own history33rd percentile
CheapestMedian 64.5xDearest

Usual range 13.7x to 99.1x since 2019-01.

Against Non-Energy Minerals46.5x vs 21.8x
This company
46.5x
Sector median
21.8x

114% above the Non-Energy Minerals median.

8.6x46.9x85.2x123.5xJan '19Aug '20Mar '22Oct '23May '25Nov '268.6x46.9x85.2x123.5xJan '19Sep '21May '24Nov '26
P/E (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianNon-Energy Minerals median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/B (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianNon-Energy Minerals median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/S (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianNon-Energy Minerals median
How to read this

Shaded band: 10th to 90th percentile of the company's own P/E history; dotted line: its median; orange line: sector median (companies with a positive multiple, at least 5 in the sector).

Sector figures are built from today's listed companies, so they exclude companies that are no longer listed.

All terms explained in the glossary →

How Non-Energy Minerals is valued

Where does it rank among Non-Energy Minerals peers?

Each cell is the company's percentile rank among its Non-Energy Minerals peers (non-financial companies) that month.
Darker is better-ranked.
Rows marked ↓ are inverted (lower debt, shorter cash cycle and a lower P/E rank higher).

Where it ranks today

  • ROCE47th▲ 24 pts vs a year ago
  • Op. margin29th▲ 8 pts vs a year ago
  • Revenue growth33rd▲ 6 pts vs a year ago
  • EPS growth2nd
  • Debt/equity ↓50th▼ 3 pts vs a year ago
  • Cash cycle ↓67th▼ 6 pts vs a year ago
  • P/E ↓19th
  • 12M momentum47th▲ 12 pts vs a year ago

Rank history

ROCE
Op. margin
Revenue growth
EPS growth
Debt/equity ↓
Cash cycle ↓
P/E ↓
12M momentum
Dec '21Jul '22Jan '23Jul '23Jan '24Jul '24Jan '25Jul '25Jan '26Jul '26Nov '26
Lower rank Higher rank Not enough data

Percentiles use today's listed companies in the sector and need at least 5 peers with a value; grey cells have too few.
ROE is computed from net profit and book value where the source does not report it.

The Non-Energy Minerals sector page Watch it move against Non-Energy Minerals in the Observatory

What is the price implying?

~25%annual earnings growth implied by the price

At a P/E of 46.6x, the price would imply about 25.4%/yr earnings growth for 10 years under the same assumptions, but it is not ranked.

Fewer than six years of annual earnings are available, which is too little to measure delivered growth.

“Implied growth” is what the current price would require under our stated assumptions, not what we expect.

What prices imply across Non-Energy Minerals The market-wide Expectations lists

Key figures

Share Priceclose 9 Nov
₹31.19
P/E
46.6x
ROCE
10.0%
Market Cap
₹1770 cr
Revenue (TTM)
₹2959 cr
P/S
0.6x
P/B
1.8x
ROE
3.8%
Operating Margin
6.0%
Debt / Equity
0.4x
Promoter Holding
45.1%
12M Momentum
-15.2%

52-week range

₹26.25₹46.12
25% of the way from its 52-week low to its high

Price risk

1Y volatility
40.5%
Beta vs sector
1-year daily
0.86

Balance sheet & cash

Interest cover
operating profit ÷ interest
0.7x
Cash from profit, 3Y
operating cash flow ÷ net profit
5.00x
Share count, 1Y
unchanged

Are profits backed by cash?

6 of 6checks within rangeAll clear
Other income reliance—Not enough data

Not enough reported data to compute this.

Tax rate15%Within range

Median quarterly effective tax rate over about 2.5 years: 15.0%. Bands: 15% to 35%, 5% to 15% or 35% to 50%, outside 5% to 50%.

Cash conversion25.35xWithin range

Operating cash flow divided by net profit over the last three fiscal years: 25.35x (cash from operations ₹507 cr, net profit ₹20 cr). Bands: 0.8x and above, 0.5x to 0.8x, below 0.5x.

Free cash flow5 of 5 yrsWithin range

Fiscal years with positive free cash flow in the last 5: 5. Bands: at least 80% of years, 40% to 80%, below 40%.

Receivable days vs history+2 daysWithin range

Debtor days are above the median of the previous three fiscal years by 2 days (11 vs 9). Bands: under 15 days, 15 to 45, over 45.

Capital work in progress2% of fixed assetsWithin range

Capital work-in-progress is 2% of fixed assets. Bands: not rising or up to 30%; rising for three years and above 30%; rising and above 60%.

Payable days+19 days / 2 yrsWithin range

Days payable changed by +19 over two years. Bands: rise of up to 30 days; more than 30 days.

Tap a check to see how it is measured

How to read this

Each check is a named rule with fixed thresholds, not a score. Annual statements are the latest restated figures, so a past year may differ from what was originally reported.

All terms explained in the glossary →

Who has been buying and selling?

  • Over 3 years, DIIs added 6.8 pts; promoters added 3.5 pts; FIIs added 1.2 pts.

Holdings, Jun '26

How each group changed

GroupSep '23Jun '26Change
Promoters41.6%45.1%+3.5 pts
FIIs0.0%1.2%+1.2 pts
DIIs9.0%15.8%+6.8 pts
Public and others49.4%37.9%-11.5 pts

Number of shareholders

55,388shareholders+1% since Sep '23
49k52k56k60k Sep '23Jun '24Mar '25Dec '25Jun '26
Sep '23: 54,764
Dec '23: 48,600
Mar '24: 49,660
Jun '24: 51,687
Sep '24: 58,970
Dec '24: 59,460
Mar '25: 59,211
Jun '25: 58,804
Sep '25: 59,609
Dec '25: 57,646
Mar '26: 56,983
Jun '26: 55,388
49k52k56k60k Sep '23Sep '24Sep '25Jun '26
Sep '23: 54,764
Dec '23: 48,600
Mar '24: 49,660
Jun '24: 51,687
Sep '24: 58,970
Dec '24: 59,460
Mar '25: 59,211
Jun '25: 58,804
Sep '25: 59,609
Dec '25: 57,646
Mar '26: 56,983
Jun '26: 55,388

Quarterly shareholding as reported, labelled by the quarter it covers (it becomes visible about two months later).
Shareholder counts are only available for recent quarters.

This quarter's smart-money board

What happened next to similar setups

+15.3%typical 12-month return vs the marketAbove the base rate
  • We found 50 past situations where a non-financial company looked like MSP STEEL & POWER LIMITED today on valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, price momentum, size and volatility.
  • Over the following 12 months the middle half of them returned −17% to +53% vs the market, against −4% for all non-financial companies in the same months.
  • The analogs' median sat above that base rate (gap +19.1%, 80% range +7.0% to +35.4%), but the matches cluster in only 6 distinct 12-month windows.

Where the 50 outcomes landed

−100%−50%0%+50%+100%
EVERESTIND · Feb 2024: −53.7% vs market
QUESS · May 2022: −47.2% vs market
UFO · Sep 2024: −43.3% vs market
STLTECH · Apr 2023: −41.9% vs market
ENIL · Sep 2025: −40.2% vs market
PARAGMILK · Jul 2021: −38.7% vs market
BLKASHYAP · Jul 2025: −34.6% vs market
IGPL · Oct 2024: −29.5% vs market
SHANKARA · Apr 2023: −27.0% vs market
KOKUYOCMLN · May 2024: −27.0% vs market
RCF · Jun 2025: −17.9% vs market
APOLSINHOT · Jul 2025: −17.7% vs market
JAYBARMARU · Sep 2021: −17.0% vs market
LUMAXIND · Jun 2021: −16.3% vs market
SOMANYCERA · Jul 2025: −14.1% vs market
FORCEMOT · Oct 2020: −14.1% vs market
HIKAL · Sep 2025: −13.9% vs market
ALICON · May 2023: −0.3% vs market
CEATLTD · Jan 2024: −0.3% vs market
MANORG · Oct 2024: +1.5% vs market
PRSMJOHNSN · Oct 2022: +3.4% vs market
EMIL · Oct 2025: +6.2% vs market
GLOBUSSPR · Oct 2024: +6.8% vs market
SHEMAROO · Jul 2022: +8.5% vs market
SANGAMIND · Jan 2025: +9.0% vs market
GSFC · Oct 2020: +21.7% vs market
TVSSRICHAK · Apr 2025: +27.4% vs market
TEXRAIL · Feb 2022: +29.2% vs market
ELECTCAST · Feb 2020: +32.9% vs market
MEGASTAR · Apr 2025: +33.6% vs market
RICOAUTO · Aug 2025: +34.4% vs market
HPL · Mar 2022: +39.5% vs market
STYRENIX · Apr 2023: +41.3% vs market
KCP · Sep 2023: +45.0% vs market
CEMPRO · Nov 2021: +48.5% vs market
SCHAND · Jun 2022: +48.9% vs market
SAGCEM · Dec 2020: +52.5% vs market
NIPPOBATRY · Dec 2022: +53.6% vs market
ISGEC · Nov 2022: +56.2% vs market
JINDWORLD · Oct 2020: +59.0% vs market
MINDACORP · Aug 2021: +76.1% vs market
SUDARSCHEM · Nov 2023: +80.8% vs market
ACLGATI · May 2020: +88.9% vs market
MANGLMCEM · Jun 2023: +90.2% vs market
ZIMLAB · Sep 2025: +93.2% vs market
THANGAMAYL · Aug 2022: +100.2% vs market
ARTEMISMED · Oct 2021: +101.3% vs market
BIRLACABLE · Oct 2025: +110.1% vs market
KIRLOSBROS · Dec 2022: +115.8% vs market
SKIPPER · Oct 2022: +206.7% vs market
Similar setups +15.3%All companies −3.8%← worse than the marketbetter than the market →

Each dot is one past situation (hover or tap for details) · Solid dots are the closest matches, listed below · Shaded is the middle half of all companies in the same months · 5 beyond the range shown, drawn at the edge

Similar setups' median
+15.3%
All companies' median
−3.8%
Beat the market
62% vs 46%

50 past situations · 50 companies · 36 months · 2020–2025

The closest matches

CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
CEMPRO
Industrial Services
Nov 2021 80x10% +31%−22% +49%
SHANKARA
Retail Trade
Apr 2023 42x10% −16%−20% −27%
TEXRAIL
Producer Manufacturing
Feb 2022 78x6% +27%−29% +29%
PARAGMILK
Consumer Non-Durables
Jul 2021 56x7% +64%−7% −39%
MANGLMCEM
Non-Energy Minerals
Jun 2023 50x8% +16%−18% +90%
Show the other 3 matches
CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
UFO
Consumer Services
Sep 2024 54x10% +23%−17% −43%
ISGEC
Industrial Services
Nov 2022 35x8% −6%−25% +56%
ACLGATI
Transportation
May 2020 22x7% −52%−56% +89%
How reliable is this?

Matched on P/E, P/S, ROCE, operating margin, debt/equity, interest cover, revenue growth, 12-month momentum, drawdown from 12-month high, size and volatility. Closest on: ROCE, drawdown from 12-month high and 12-month momentum. One match per company and at most 7 from any one month.

Independent periods: the matches fall in 6 distinct 12-month windows. Matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, so fewer windows means less evidence.

How this is built

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to MSP STEEL & POWER LIMITED. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

Methodology

How historical analogs are built

Data as of 2026-11-09. Outcome pool: Jan 2020 to Oct 2025.

For every company we look at the situation it is in today (valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, 12-month price momentum, drawdown, size and volatility) and find past company-months that looked most like it. We then show what happened to those past situations over the following 12 months, measured against the ApnaFunda All index and against the base rate. It describes history. It does not predict anything.

What is compared

FeatureWeightNon-financialFinancial
P/E1yesyes
P/S1yes—
P/B1—yes
ROCE1yes—
operating margin1yes—
ROE1—yes
debt/equity0.75yes—
interest cover0.5yes—
revenue growth0.75yesyes
12-month momentum1yesyes
drawdown from 12-month high0.75yesyes
size0.75yesyes
volatility0.5yesyes

Weights were set by judgement before any outcome was looked at and are never tuned on results. Loss-making companies (negative P/E or net profit) are only matched with other loss-making companies. Banks, NBFCs and insurers are compared only with each other and use a different feature set. Every feature is converted, month by month, to its rank among companies in the same pool in that month, so a P/E of 30 in a hot market and a P/E of 22 in a cold one can match if both were equally expensive for their time. Only that month's data is used.

How closeness and the sample are defined

Distance is the weighted root-mean-square gap between the standardised features both companies have. A match needs at least 70% of the query's feature weight, a distance of at most 0.9, and 30 matches at minimum to be shown. We keep up to 50 matches with these exclusions: never the company itself, one match per company (its closest month), and at most 7 from any one calendar month so a single market episode cannot dominate.

Base rate

The base rate is the distribution of 12-month returns, relative to the market, of every eligible company-month in the same pool, with each month weighted to match the months the analogs came from. It answers: how did a random company do in these same months? Because matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, we also report the number of distinct 12-month windows behind a result, and a bootstrap that resamples months decides whether the analog median differs from the base rate at all. "Not meaningfully different" is the usual outcome and the page copy is written for it.

Limits you should know

  • One market period. The outcome pool covers 2020–2025 only (70 months), including the 2020 crash and the 2020–21 rally.
  • Survivorship. Only companies listed today are included. Delisted and bankrupt companies are missing, which flatters past outcomes, particularly for distressed-looking setups.
  • Price return only. Dividends are excluded, and the benchmark is an ApnaFunda market-cap-weighted index of the same listed companies, not an official index.
  • Reporting lag. Fundamentals are matched on an assumed 60-day lag after the quarter end, not on real announcement dates.
  • Pools: non-financial: 98,395 company-months from 2019 companies; financial: 5,659 company-months from 108 companies. 2349 companies currently have a result; the rest are suppressed because too few comparable situations exist.

Does it work? A walk-forward check

The walk-forward check has not been run for this build, so skill is shown as not yet measured.

Disclaimer

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to any company shown. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

What else looks like this?

Companies with the most similar financial profile today, regardless of industry.

TVS SRICHAKRATVSSRICHAK
Consumer Durables
72%similar
promoter holdingvolatility
Producer Manufacturing
68%similar
ROCEvolatility
GREAVES COTTONGREAVESCOT
Producer Manufacturing
64%similar
operating marginROCE
Producer Manufacturing
61%similar
promoter holdingoperating margin
Producer Manufacturing
59%similar
revenuedebt/equity
Non-Energy Minerals
54%similar
operating marginpromoter holding
Non-Energy Minerals
51%similar
revenueROCE
Non-Energy Minerals
50%similar
market caprevenue

Similarity is statistical, based on reported metrics; it does not imply similar business quality or future returns.

What changed?

30 events since Oct '23

  1. SepPromoterPromoter holding rose 4.9 pts to 45.1% (largest rise in the history since 2019-01).
  2. JunPromoterPromoter holding rose 2.5 pts to 40.2% (largest rise since 2026-03).
  3. JunResultsEPS (TTM) turned positive.
  4. JunPeer rankMoved into the 3rd quartile of Non-Energy Minerals on ROCE (from the bottom quartile).
  5. JunPriceVolume reached 7.7x its 50-day median on 2026-06-02; price +0.8% that day.
  6. MarPromoterPromoter holding rose 2.5 pts to 37.7%.
  7. MarPeer rankMoved into the 3rd quartile of Non-Energy Minerals on operating margin (from the bottom quartile).
  8. FebDebtDebt / equity halved over 12 months to 0.31x.
Show 22 earlier events
  1. NovPriceVolume reached 8.6x its 50-day median on 2025-11-12; price +3.9% that day.
  2. SepPeer rankSlipped to the bottom quartile of Non-Energy Minerals on operating margin (from the 3rd quartile).
  3. JulDebtDebt / equity halved over 12 months to 0.31x.
  4. JulPriceVolume reached 15.9x its 50-day median on 2025-07-09; price +6.2% that day.
  5. JunResultsEPS (TTM) turned negative.
  6. JunPeer rankSlipped to the bottom quartile of Non-Energy Minerals on ROCE (from the 3rd quartile).
  7. JunDebtDebt / equity fell below 1.0x (0.31x).
  8. JunSharesShare count is up 47.3% over 12 months.
  9. MarPromoterPromoter holding fell 5.5 pts to 36.9%.
  10. MarInstitutionsFII + DII holding rose 10.4 pts over 1 quarter to 13.4%.
  11. MarPriceFell 64% from the Sep 2024 peak to the Mar 2025 low.
  12. DecValuationP/E crossed above the 90th percentile of its own history to date (102.3x).
  13. AugPriceRegained the 2024-01 peak, 5 months after the low.
  14. AugValuationP/E crossed above the 90th percentile of its own history to date (109.6x).
  15. AugPriceVolume reached 18.4x its 50-day median on 2024-08-02; price +4.8% that day.
  16. JunResultsEPS (TTM) turned positive.
  17. JunPeer rankMoved into the 3rd quartile of Non-Energy Minerals on ROCE (from the bottom quartile).
  18. MarInstitutionsFII + DII holding fell 5.8 pts over 1 quarter to 3.1%.
  19. MarPriceFell 28% from the Jan 2024 peak to the Mar 2024 low.
  20. MarPriceVolume reached 6.6x its 50-day median on 2024-03-28; price +2.7% that day.
  21. OctPriceRegained the 2022-01 peak, 7 months after the low.
  22. OctPriceVolume reached 12.1x its 50-day median on 2023-10-05; price +1.9% that day.

Events are generated from the data by fixed rules.
The month shown is when the change became visible in the reported figures, assuming a 60-day lag after each quarter end; it is not an announcement date.

Where price and fundamentals disagree, market-wide Rewind the whole market to any month

Monthly history95 months · 2019-01 to 2026-11
MonthP/ERevenue (TTM)ROEROCEDebt / Equity
2026-1146.6x₹2959 cr3.8%10.0%0.4x
2026-1044.2x₹2959 cr3.7%10.0%0.4x
2026-0949.3x₹2959 cr3.7%10.0%0.4x
2026-0860.1x₹2843 cr3.3%10.0%0.4x
2026-0758.2x₹2843 cr3.3%10.0%0.4x
2026-0668.9x₹2843 cr3.3%10.0%0.4x
2026-05—₹2787 cr-9.1%6.0%0.3x
2026-04—₹2787 cr-9.1%6.0%0.3x
2026-03—₹2787 cr-9.1%6.0%0.3x
2026-02—₹2865 cr-8.8%6.0%0.3x
2026-01—₹2865 cr-8.8%6.0%0.3x
2025-12—₹2865 cr-8.8%6.0%0.3x
2025-11—₹2844 cr-1.9%6.0%0.3x
2025-10—₹2844 cr-1.9%6.0%0.3x
2025-09—₹2844 cr-1.9%6.0%0.3x
2025-08—₹2905 cr-3.1%6.0%0.3x
2025-07—₹2905 cr-3.1%6.0%0.3x
2025-06—₹2905 cr-3.1%6.0%0.3x
2025-0559.5x₹2893 cr3.3%8.0%1.5x
2025-0457.8x₹2893 cr3.3%8.0%1.5x
2025-0358.1x₹2893 cr3.3%8.0%1.5x
2025-0253.5x₹2957 cr2.7%8.0%1.5x
2025-0180.3x₹2957 cr2.7%8.0%1.5x
2024-12102.3x₹2957 cr2.7%8.0%1.5x
2024-1175.7x₹2975 cr4.2%8.0%1.5x
2024-1071.9x₹2975 cr4.2%8.0%1.5x
2024-0990.3x₹2975 cr4.2%8.0%1.5x
2024-08109.6x₹2874 cr2.5%8.0%1.5x
2024-0786.5x₹2874 cr2.5%8.0%1.5x
2024-0669.9x₹2874 cr2.5%8.0%1.5x
2024-05—₹2550 cr-9.5%2.0%1.5x
2024-04—₹2550 cr-9.5%2.0%1.5x
2024-03—₹2550 cr-9.5%2.0%1.5x
2024-02—₹2550 cr-9.5%2.0%1.5x
2024-01—₹2550 cr-9.5%2.0%1.5x
2023-12—₹2550 cr-9.5%2.0%1.5x
2023-11—₹2550 cr-9.5%2.0%1.5x
2023-10—₹2550 cr-9.5%2.0%1.5x
2023-09—₹2550 cr-9.5%2.0%1.5x
2023-08—₹2550 cr-9.5%2.0%1.5x
2023-07—₹2550 cr-9.5%2.0%1.5x
2023-06—₹2550 cr-9.5%2.0%1.5x
2023-0512.5x₹2340 cr4.4%7.0%1.5x
2023-0412.7x₹2340 cr4.4%7.0%1.5x
2023-0311.8x₹2340 cr4.4%7.0%1.5x
2023-0212.8x₹2340 cr4.4%7.0%1.5x
2023-0114.0x₹2340 cr4.4%7.0%1.5x
2022-1214.6x₹2340 cr4.4%7.0%1.5x
2022-1114.6x₹2340 cr4.4%7.0%1.5x
2022-1013.7x₹2340 cr4.4%7.0%1.5x
2022-0913.9x₹2340 cr4.4%7.0%1.5x
2022-0814.0x₹2340 cr4.4%7.0%1.5x
2022-0714.5x₹2340 cr4.4%7.0%1.5x
2022-0614.8x₹2340 cr4.4%7.0%1.5x
2022-0588.1x₹1723 cr0.9%6.0%1.4x
2022-04100.0x₹1723 cr0.9%6.0%1.4x
2022-0382.3x₹1723 cr0.9%6.0%1.4x
2022-0289.2x₹1723 cr0.9%6.0%1.4x
2022-01110.0x₹1723 cr0.9%6.0%1.4x
2021-12123.5x₹1723 cr0.9%6.0%1.4x
2021-1168.8x₹1723 cr0.9%6.0%1.4x
2021-1069.6x₹1723 cr0.9%6.0%1.4x
2021-0972.3x₹1723 cr0.9%6.0%1.4x
2021-0872.7x₹1723 cr0.9%6.0%1.4x
2021-0791.2x₹1723 cr0.9%6.0%1.4x
2021-0684.6x₹1723 cr0.9%6.0%1.4x
2021-05—₹1533 cr-11.5%2.0%1.5x
2021-04—₹1533 cr-11.5%2.0%1.5x
2021-03—₹1533 cr-11.5%2.0%1.5x
2021-02—₹1533 cr-11.5%2.0%1.5x
2021-01—₹1533 cr-11.5%2.0%1.5x
2020-12—₹1533 cr-11.5%2.0%1.5x
2020-11—₹1533 cr-11.5%2.0%1.5x
2020-10—₹1533 cr-11.5%2.0%1.5x
2020-09—₹1533 cr-11.5%2.0%1.5x
2020-08—₹1533 cr-11.5%2.0%1.5x
2020-07—₹1533 cr-11.5%2.0%1.5x
2020-06—₹1533 cr-11.5%2.0%1.5x
2020-05—₹1670 cr-3.3%5.0%1.4x
2020-04—₹1670 cr-3.3%5.0%1.4x
2020-03—₹1670 cr-3.3%5.0%1.4x
2020-02—₹1670 cr-3.3%5.0%1.4x
2020-01—₹1670 cr-3.3%5.0%1.4x
2019-12—₹1670 cr-3.3%5.0%1.4x
2019-11—₹1670 cr-3.3%5.0%1.4x
2019-10—₹1670 cr-3.3%5.0%1.4x
2019-09—₹1670 cr-3.3%5.0%1.4x
2019-08—₹1670 cr-3.3%5.0%1.4x
2019-07—₹1670 cr-3.3%5.0%1.4x
2019-06—₹1670 cr-3.3%5.0%1.4x
2019-05—₹1160 cr-8.6%4.0%1.4x
2019-04—₹1160 cr-8.6%4.0%1.4x
2019-03—₹1160 cr-8.6%4.0%1.4x
2019-02—₹1160 cr-8.6%4.0%1.4x
2019-01—₹1160 cr-8.6%4.0%1.4x

Methodology and data notes

Methodology

Methodology and data notes

All figures come from public exchange prices and screener.in financial statements. Quarterly and annual results are shown from 60 days after the period end, so a month never uses a result before it would plausibly have been published. Statements are the latest versions, which may include later restatements.

Sector medians, percentiles and indices use today's listed companies in the sector (survivorship bias). Prices are adjusted for splits and bonus issues; around a corporate action the fundamentals may lag the price by up to a month, and affected sections are hidden.

The return decomposition uses price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count. The reverse DCF uses a fixed 12% cost of equity, a 10-year horizon and a 15x terminal P/E, and is an illustration only. Events, flags and twins follow fixed rules and thresholds described next to each section.

Feedback