अApnaFunda

ELECTROSTEEL CASTINGS LTD (ELECTCAST)

Non-Energy Minerals · Steel · figures to Nov '26

Quality scoreHow the business itself ranks against its sector peers on profitability, 3-year growth and leverage. 50 is the middle of the sector.36 / 100
Profitability 29Growth 11Balance sheet 68
Momentum scoreHow strong the recent trend is: 3-month price change, 12-month improvement in earnings and the rise in FII + DII holding, among companies above ₹500 cr.20 / 100
Price 48Earnings 10FII/DII 3

Passes these screensCash RichLittle growth priced in

Share price

Closing priceAdjusted for splits and bonus issues.

₹69.27 latest close · −11.0% over the last 90 sessions

₹70₹80Jul 3Jul 29Aug 24Sep 17Oct 14Nov 9 ₹70₹80Jul 3Sep 4Nov 9

₹69.27 month-end · −6.4% over 12 months

₹70₹80Nov '25Jan '26Apr '26Jun '26Sep '26Nov '26 ₹70₹80Nov '25May '26Nov '26

₹69.27 month-end · −41.1% over 3 years

₹50₹100₹150₹200Nov '23Jun '24Jan '25Sep '25Apr '26Nov '26 ₹50₹100₹150₹200Nov '23May '25Nov '26

₹69.27 month-end · +226.0% since Jan '19

₹0₹100₹200Jan '19Aug '20Mar '22Sep '23Apr '25Nov '26 ₹0₹100₹200Jan '19Dec '22Nov '26

52-week range ₹60.15 to ₹95.90 · 1-year volatility 47.9%

Was the rally earned?

-6%share price, 1 yearEarnings-driven

Mostly earnings.

  • Per-share earnings took off 150 points, while the multiple moved less (P/E 8.0x to 35.3x).
  • The share count barely moved.
Net profit growth: −150 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).−150 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: +144 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+144 ptsP/E changeShare price: −6%−6%Share priceNet profit growth: −150 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).−150ProfitP/E change: +144 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+144P/EShare price: −6%−6%Share price
Net profit growth-150 ptsNet profit fell about 79%, which lowers the price.
P/E change+144 ptsThe P/E rose from 8.0x to 35.3x, which lifts the price.
Share count change0 ptsShare count was little changed. More shares would count against the price.
-41%share price, 3 yearsEarnings-driven

Mostly earnings.

  • Per-share earnings took off 77 points, while the multiple moved less (P/E 22.2x to 35.3x).
  • The share count rose 4%.
Net profit growth: −74 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).−74 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: +36 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+36 ptsP/E changeShare count change: −3 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−3 ptsShare count changeShare price: −41%−41%Share priceNet profit growth: −74 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).−74ProfitP/E change: +36 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+36P/EShare count change: −3 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−3SharesShare price: −41%−41%Share price
Net profit growth-74 ptsNet profit fell about 62%, which lowers the price.
P/E change+36 ptsThe P/E rose from 22.2x to 35.3x, which lifts the price.
Share count change-3 ptsShare count rose 4%, which lowers the price.
What do "pts" mean?

"pts" are percentage points of the share price return. The parts add up to the total shown for each period. Because price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count, higher profit pushes the price up, a higher P/E pushes it up, and more shares push it down.

Example: if the price rose 34% and profit growth accounts for +58 pts while a lower P/E accounts for -24 pts, then 58 - 24 = 34. The +58 is not the profit growth rate itself: it is the part of the price move that profit growth explains.

Not shown for 5 years: earnings were negative at one end, or there is not enough history.

Net profit is trailing twelve months as reported with a 60-day lag.

Compare this with JSW STEEL

How rough has the ride been?

Maximum drawdown-73.5%not yet recovered
1-year volatility47.9%annualised
Beta vs sector index1.233-year daily, correlation 0.51
Volume spikes3last 90 sessions, 5x the 50-day median

Drawdown from peak

0%−20%−40%−60%2020202120222023202420252026−72.5% 0%−20%−40%−60%2020202220242026−72.5%
Largest drawdowns

-73.5% (2024-09 peak to 2026-03 low, not yet recovered)

-60.5% (2019-03 peak to 2020-03 low, recovered 2020-10)

-42.1% (2022-01 peak to 2022-06 low, recovered 2023-05)

Most recent volume spikes

2026-10-06: 5.6x the 50-day median, price +4.9% that day

2026-09-29: 19.8x the 50-day median, price +5.8% that day

2026-09-28: 15.2x the 50-day median, price 0.0% that day

Beta is the slope of daily returns against a market-cap-weighted index of the sector's other listed companies, built from today's constituents (so it excludes companies no longer listed).

Is it expensive against its own past and its peers?

35.3xP/E todayNear its historic high
Against its own history98th percentile
CheapestMedian 9.9xDearest

Usual range 5.7x to 30.3x since 2019-01.

Against Non-Energy Minerals35.3x vs 21.8x
This company
35.3x
Sector median
21.8x

62% above the Non-Energy Minerals median.

3.8x15.2x26.6x37.9xJan '19Aug '20Mar '22Oct '23May '25Nov '263.8x15.2x26.6x37.9xJan '19Sep '21May '24Nov '26
P/E (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianNon-Energy Minerals median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/B (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianNon-Energy Minerals median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/S (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianNon-Energy Minerals median
How to read this

Shaded band: 10th to 90th percentile of the company's own P/E history; dotted line: its median; orange line: sector median (companies with a positive multiple, at least 5 in the sector).

Sector figures are built from today's listed companies, so they exclude companies that are no longer listed.

All terms explained in the glossary →

How Non-Energy Minerals is valued

Where does it rank among Non-Energy Minerals peers?

Each cell is the company's percentile rank among its Non-Energy Minerals peers (non-financial companies) that month.
Darker is better-ranked.
Rows marked ↓ are inverted (lower debt, shorter cash cycle and a lower P/E rank higher).

Where it ranks today

  • ROCE26th▼ 31 pts vs a year ago
  • Op. margin32nd▼ 17 pts vs a year ago
  • Revenue growth10thflat vs a year ago
  • EPS growth7th▼ 14 pts vs a year ago
  • Debt/equity ↓58th▲ 9 pts vs a year ago
  • Cash cycle ↓11thflat vs a year ago
  • P/E ↓29th▼ 64 pts vs a year ago
  • 12M momentum55th▲ 49 pts vs a year ago

Rank history

ROCE
Op. margin
Revenue growth
EPS growth
Debt/equity ↓
Cash cycle ↓
P/E ↓
12M momentum
Dec '21Jul '22Jan '23Jul '23Jan '24Jul '24Jan '25Jul '25Jan '26Jul '26Nov '26
Lower rank Higher rank Not enough data

Percentiles use today's listed companies in the sector and need at least 5 peers with a value; grey cells have too few.
ROE is computed from net profit and book value where the source does not report it.

The Non-Energy Minerals sector page Watch it move against Non-Energy Minerals in the Observatory

What is the price implying?

~6%annual earnings growth implied by the priceBelow delivered growth

At normalised P/E (five-year average earnings) of 9.3x, a holder earning 12%/yr needs earnings to grow about 5.6%/yr for 10 years, then trade at 15x.

Delivered17.5%/yrEPS, last 10 fiscal years · 3-yr avg to 3-yr avg
Gap−12.0 ptsimplied minus delivered
Rank724thmost demanding of 856

Over time

Implied growth by month (solid) and delivered growth (dashed).

0%282%564% Jan 2019Nov 2026 0%282%564% Jan 2019Nov 2026

Change the assumptions

Exit P/E / return11%12%13%
12x6.8%7.8%8.8%
15x4.6%5.6%6.5%
20x1.8%2.7%3.6%

Drag a slider to test other assumptions

Implied: 5.6%/yr

Looking back

  • Jan 2020Price implied 15%/yr; EPS has since grown 15%/yr (7.0 yrs)
  • Jan 2021Price implied 8%/yr; EPS has since grown −6%/yr (6.0 yrs)

Past comparisons cover only companies listed today (survivorship bias) and say nothing about future outcomes.

“Implied growth” is what the current price would require under our stated assumptions, not what we expect. How this is calculated and the market-wide lists.

What prices imply across Non-Energy Minerals The market-wide Expectations lists

Key figures

Share Priceclose 9 Nov
₹69.27
P/E
35.3x
ROCE
5.0%
Market Cap
₹4279 cr
Revenue (TTM)
₹5787 cr
P/S
0.7x
P/B
0.7x
ROE
2.0%
Operating Margin
7.0%
Debt / Equity
0.3x
Promoter Holding
50.1%
12M Momentum
-6.4%

52-week range

₹60.15₹95.90
26% of the way from its 52-week low to its high

Price risk

1Y volatility
47.9%
Beta vs sector
1-year daily
1.05

Balance sheet & cash

Interest cover
operating profit ÷ interest
2.2x
Cash from profit, 3Y
operating cash flow ÷ net profit
1.51x
Share count, 1Y
unchanged

Are profits backed by cash?

6 of 7checks within range1 beyond a threshold
Other income reliance112%Beyond threshold

Other income as a share of pre-tax profit (trailing twelve months): 112.0%. Bands: below 15%, 15% to 35%, above 35%.

Tax rate27%Within range

Median quarterly effective tax rate over about 2.5 years: 26.5%. Bands: 15% to 35%, 5% to 15% or 35% to 50%, outside 5% to 50%.

Cash conversion1.51xWithin range

Operating cash flow divided by net profit over the last three fiscal years: 1.51x (cash from operations ₹2,430 cr, net profit ₹1,611 cr). Bands: 0.8x and above, 0.5x to 0.8x, below 0.5x.

Free cash flow4 of 5 yrsWithin range

Fiscal years with positive free cash flow in the last 5: 4. Bands: at least 80% of years, 40% to 80%, below 40%.

Receivable days vs history-1 daysWithin range

Debtor days are below the median of the previous three fiscal years by 1 days (66 vs 67). Bands: under 15 days, 15 to 45, over 45.

Capital work in progress37% of fixed assetsWithin range

Capital work-in-progress is 37% of fixed assets. Bands: not rising or up to 30%; rising for three years and above 30%; rising and above 60%.

Payable days+10 days / 2 yrsWithin range

Days payable changed by +10 over two years. Bands: rise of up to 30 days; more than 30 days.

Tap a check to see how it is measured

How to read this

Each check is a named rule with fixed thresholds, not a score. Annual statements are the latest restated figures, so a past year may differ from what was originally reported.

All terms explained in the glossary →

Who has been buying and selling?

  • Over 3 years, promoters added 6.1 pts; FIIs trimmed 2.5 pts; DIIs trimmed 0.5 pts.
  • The number of shareholders rose from 1.0 lakh to 1.8 lakh (+71%) between Sep 2023 and Jun 2026.

Holdings, Jun '26

How each group changed

GroupSep '23Jun '26Change
Promoters44.1%50.1%+6.1 pts
FIIs15.3%12.8%-2.5 pts
DIIs0.9%0.4%-0.5 pts
Public and others39.5%36.5%-3.0 pts

Number of shareholders

1.8 lakhshareholders+71% since Sep '23
1.0L1.3L1.6L1.9L Sep '23Jun '24Mar '25Dec '25Jun '26
Sep '23: 1.0 lakh
Dec '23: 1.1 lakh
Mar '24: 1.2 lakh
Jun '24: 1.3 lakh
Sep '24: 1.5 lakh
Dec '24: 1.7 lakh
Mar '25: 1.7 lakh
Jun '25: 1.8 lakh
Sep '25: 1.9 lakh
Dec '25: 1.8 lakh
Mar '26: 1.8 lakh
Jun '26: 1.8 lakh
1.0L1.3L1.6L1.9L Sep '23Sep '24Sep '25Jun '26
Sep '23: 1.0 lakh
Dec '23: 1.1 lakh
Mar '24: 1.2 lakh
Jun '24: 1.3 lakh
Sep '24: 1.5 lakh
Dec '24: 1.7 lakh
Mar '25: 1.7 lakh
Jun '25: 1.8 lakh
Sep '25: 1.9 lakh
Dec '25: 1.8 lakh
Mar '26: 1.8 lakh
Jun '26: 1.8 lakh

Quarterly shareholding as reported, labelled by the quarter it covers (it becomes visible about two months later).
Shareholder counts are only available for recent quarters.

This quarter's smart-money board

What happened next to similar setups

+1.1%typical 12-month return vs the marketNot meaningfully different from the base rate
  • We found 50 past situations where a non-financial company looked like ELECTROSTEEL CASTINGS LTD today on valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, price momentum, size and volatility.
  • Over the following 12 months the middle half of them returned −28% to +41% vs the market, against −4% for all non-financial companies in the same months.
  • The gap against the base rate (+5.0%, 80% range −9.7% to +14.8%) is within what chance and overlapping periods produce.

Where the 50 outcomes landed

−100%−50%0%+50%+100%
RAMASTEEL · Aug 2025: −59.4% vs market
SAURASHCEM · Oct 2025: −52.7% vs market
RGL · May 2022: −45.1% vs market
RUSHIL · Sep 2025: −44.0% vs market
OMINFRAL · Sep 2025: −40.0% vs market
IGPL · Nov 2024: −39.1% vs market
PARAGMILK · Jul 2021: −38.7% vs market
BODALCHEM · Oct 2021: −36.4% vs market
BLKASHYAP · Jul 2025: −34.6% vs market
VENKEYS · Jul 2023: −33.7% vs market
SPMLINFRA · Sep 2025: −32.4% vs market
FORCEMOT · Dec 2020: −31.9% vs market
OAL · Sep 2024: −28.6% vs market
MANALIPETC · Mar 2025: −27.9% vs market
COASTCORP · Jan 2024: −27.2% vs market
MIRZAINT · Oct 2025: −26.7% vs market
RCF · Jun 2024: −19.3% vs market
POLYPLEX · Oct 2024: −18.8% vs market
IFGLEXPOR · Aug 2025: −18.5% vs market
BHAGERIA · Apr 2024: −14.2% vs market
NAHARPOLY · Nov 2024: −9.9% vs market
WELSPUNLIV · May 2024: −7.4% vs market
INDIACEM · Dec 2022: −6.7% vs market
VASCONEQ · Feb 2020: −3.7% vs market
NELCAST · May 2025: +0.6% vs market
THEINVEST · Feb 2024: +1.6% vs market
CIEINDIA · Apr 2021: +4.8% vs market
KCP · Mar 2024: +11.8% vs market
ORIENTCER · Oct 2025: +12.2% vs market
UNICHEMLAB · Mar 2023: +14.3% vs market
KOKUYOCMLN · Feb 2023: +18.8% vs market
APEX · Nov 2024: +21.4% vs market
SHANKARA · Dec 2021: +21.5% vs market
ORICONENT · Jul 2020: +22.4% vs market
NIPPOBATRY · Nov 2022: +33.2% vs market
GSFC · May 2021: +36.9% vs market
ISGEC · Mar 2023: +38.5% vs market
STYRENIX · Apr 2023: +41.3% vs market
SUNFLAG · Jun 2024: +45.5% vs market
BBL · Apr 2022: +62.9% vs market
HBLENGINE · Mar 2020: +68.6% vs market
EVERESTIND · Feb 2021: +73.8% vs market
GALLANTT · Jul 2020: +77.2% vs market
BEML · Jun 2023: +86.9% vs market
ARTEMISMED · Oct 2021: +101.3% vs market
KIRLOSBROS · Dec 2022: +115.8% vs market
TIRUMALCHM · Apr 2021: +136.4% vs market
TEXRAIL · Mar 2023: +161.3% vs market
DEEPAKFERT · Jan 2021: +169.0% vs market
PCJEWELLER · Sep 2021: +214.0% vs market
Similar setups +1.1%All companies −3.9%← worse than the marketbetter than the market →

Each dot is one past situation (hover or tap for details) · Solid dots are the closest matches, listed below · Shaded is the middle half of all companies in the same months · 6 beyond the range shown, drawn at the edge

Similar setups' median
+1.1%
All companies' median
−3.9%
Beat the market
52% vs 46%

50 past situations · 50 companies · 36 months · 2020–2025

The closest matches

CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
RCF
Process Industries
Jun 2024 47x6% +77%−13% −19%
WELSPUNLIV
Consumer Non-Durables
May 2024 69x6% +48%−19% −7%
HBLENGINE
Producer Manufacturing
Mar 2020 11x6% −57%−61% +69%
FORCEMOT
Consumer Durables
Dec 2020 36x5% +26%−10% −32%
APEX
Consumer Non-Durables
Nov 2024 50x5% +9%−24% +21%
Show the other 3 matches
CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
MANALIPETC
Process Industries
Mar 2025 48x5% 0%−45% −28%
NAHARPOLY
Process Industries
Nov 2024 42x0% +21%−21% −10%
SAURASHCEM
Non-Energy Minerals
Oct 2025 81x2% −16%−21% −53%
How reliable is this?

Matched on P/E, P/S, ROCE, operating margin, debt/equity, interest cover, revenue growth, 12-month momentum, drawdown from 12-month high, size and volatility. Closest on: drawdown from 12-month high, 12-month momentum and ROCE. One match per company and at most 7 from any one month.

Independent periods: the matches fall in 6 distinct 12-month windows. Matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, so fewer windows means less evidence.

How this is built

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to ELECTROSTEEL CASTINGS LTD. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

Methodology

How historical analogs are built

Data as of 2026-11-09. Outcome pool: Jan 2020 to Oct 2025.

For every company we look at the situation it is in today (valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, 12-month price momentum, drawdown, size and volatility) and find past company-months that looked most like it. We then show what happened to those past situations over the following 12 months, measured against the ApnaFunda All index and against the base rate. It describes history. It does not predict anything.

What is compared

FeatureWeightNon-financialFinancial
P/E1yesyes
P/S1yes—
P/B1—yes
ROCE1yes—
operating margin1yes—
ROE1—yes
debt/equity0.75yes—
interest cover0.5yes—
revenue growth0.75yesyes
12-month momentum1yesyes
drawdown from 12-month high0.75yesyes
size0.75yesyes
volatility0.5yesyes

Weights were set by judgement before any outcome was looked at and are never tuned on results. Loss-making companies (negative P/E or net profit) are only matched with other loss-making companies. Banks, NBFCs and insurers are compared only with each other and use a different feature set. Every feature is converted, month by month, to its rank among companies in the same pool in that month, so a P/E of 30 in a hot market and a P/E of 22 in a cold one can match if both were equally expensive for their time. Only that month's data is used.

How closeness and the sample are defined

Distance is the weighted root-mean-square gap between the standardised features both companies have. A match needs at least 70% of the query's feature weight, a distance of at most 0.9, and 30 matches at minimum to be shown. We keep up to 50 matches with these exclusions: never the company itself, one match per company (its closest month), and at most 7 from any one calendar month so a single market episode cannot dominate.

Base rate

The base rate is the distribution of 12-month returns, relative to the market, of every eligible company-month in the same pool, with each month weighted to match the months the analogs came from. It answers: how did a random company do in these same months? Because matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, we also report the number of distinct 12-month windows behind a result, and a bootstrap that resamples months decides whether the analog median differs from the base rate at all. "Not meaningfully different" is the usual outcome and the page copy is written for it.

Limits you should know

  • One market period. The outcome pool covers 2020–2025 only (70 months), including the 2020 crash and the 2020–21 rally.
  • Survivorship. Only companies listed today are included. Delisted and bankrupt companies are missing, which flatters past outcomes, particularly for distressed-looking setups.
  • Price return only. Dividends are excluded, and the benchmark is an ApnaFunda market-cap-weighted index of the same listed companies, not an official index.
  • Reporting lag. Fundamentals are matched on an assumed 60-day lag after the quarter end, not on real announcement dates.
  • Pools: non-financial: 98,395 company-months from 2019 companies; financial: 5,659 company-months from 108 companies. 2349 companies currently have a result; the rest are suppressed because too few comparable situations exist.

Does it work? A walk-forward check

The walk-forward check has not been run for this build, so skill is shown as not yet measured.

Disclaimer

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to any company shown. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

What else looks like this?

Companies with the most similar financial profile today, regardless of industry.

Industrial Services
60%similar
market capEPS growth
RAYMONDRAYMOND
Process Industries
58%similar
promoter holdingEPS growth
Process Industries
58%similar
ROCEdebt/equity
Industrial Services
56%similar
P/Eoperating margin
Producer Manufacturing
56%similar
P/EROCE
Non-Energy Minerals
67%similar
ROCEP/E
JINDAL SAWJINDALSAW
Non-Energy Minerals
55%similar
volatilityoperating margin
Non-Energy Minerals
54%similar
operating marginpromoter holding

Similarity is statistical, based on reported metrics; it does not imply similar business quality or future returns.

What changed?

30 events since Oct '23

  1. OctPriceVolume reached 5.6x its 50-day median on 2026-10-06; price +4.9% that day.
  2. SepPeer rankMoved into the 3rd quartile of Non-Energy Minerals on operating margin (from the bottom quartile).
  3. SepPriceVolume reached 19.8x its 50-day median on 2026-09-29; price +5.8% that day.
  4. AugPeer rankMoved into the 3rd quartile of Non-Energy Minerals on ROCE (from the bottom quartile).
  5. JunPromoterPromoter holding rose 3.9 pts to 50.1%.
  6. JunInstitutionsFII + DII holding fell 3.7 pts over 1 quarter to 16.0%.
  7. JunValuationP/E crossed above the 90th percentile of its own history to date (30.4x).
  8. JunPeer rankSlipped to the bottom quartile of Non-Energy Minerals on ROCE (from the 2nd quartile).
Show 22 earlier events
  1. AprPriceVolume reached 5.1x its 50-day median on 2026-04-17; price -4.6% that day.
  2. MarPriceFell 74% from the Sep 2024 peak to the Mar 2026 low.
  3. MarPeer rankSlipped to the bottom quartile of Non-Energy Minerals on operating margin (from the 3rd quartile).
  4. MarPriceVolume reached 18.8x its 50-day median on 2026-03-12; price +4.7% that day.
  5. SepPeer rankSlipped to the bottom quartile of Non-Energy Minerals on EPS growth (from the 3rd quartile).
  6. JunResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned negative.
  7. JunPeer rankSlipped to the 3rd quartile of Non-Energy Minerals on operating margin (from the 2nd quartile).
  8. JunPriceVolume reached 8.5x its 50-day median on 2025-06-11; price +8.3% that day.
  9. DecPeer rankSlipped to the 2nd quartile of Non-Energy Minerals on operating margin (from the top quartile).
  10. SepPeer rankMoved into the top quartile of Non-Energy Minerals on operating margin (from the 2nd quartile).
  11. JulPriceRegained the 2024-04 peak, 1 month after the low.
  12. JulPriceVolume reached 7.3x its 50-day median on 2024-07-24; price +7.7% that day.
  13. JunPromoterPromoter holding rose 2.1 pts to 46.2%.
  14. JunResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned positive.
  15. JunInstitutionsFII + DII holding rose 3.8 pts over 2 quarters to 20.1%.
  16. JunPriceFell 30% from the Apr 2024 peak to the Jun 2024 low.
  17. JunPeer rankMoved into the 2nd quartile of Non-Energy Minerals on ROCE (from the 3rd quartile).
  18. JunSharesShare count is up 5.1% over 12 months.
  19. AprPriceRegained the 2024-02 peak, 1 month after the low.
  20. MarPriceFell 27% from the Feb 2024 peak to the Mar 2024 low.
  21. OctValuationP/E crossed above the 90th percentile of its own history to date (16.0x).
  22. OctPriceVolume reached 5.7x its 50-day median on 2023-10-11; price +8.4% that day.

Events are generated from the data by fixed rules.
The month shown is when the change became visible in the reported figures, assuming a 60-day lag after each quarter end; it is not an announcement date.

Where price and fundamentals disagree, market-wide Rewind the whole market to any month

Monthly history95 months · 2019-01 to 2026-11
MonthP/ERevenue (TTM)ROEROCEDebt / Equity
2026-1135.3x₹5787 cr2.0%5.0%0.3x
2026-1032.4x₹5787 cr2.0%5.0%0.3x
2026-0937.9x₹5787 cr2.0%5.0%0.3x
2026-0831.8x₹5919 cr2.7%5.0%0.3x
2026-0727.0x₹5919 cr2.7%5.0%0.3x
2026-0630.4x₹5919 cr2.7%5.0%0.3x
2026-0515.2x₹6127 cr5.4%13.0%0.4x
2026-0416.1x₹6127 cr5.4%13.0%0.4x
2026-0314.5x₹6127 cr5.4%13.0%0.4x
2026-028.6x₹6435 cr8.6%13.0%0.4x
2026-018.9x₹6435 cr8.6%13.0%0.4x
2025-129.8x₹6435 cr8.6%13.0%0.4x
2025-118.0x₹6867 cr9.9%13.0%0.4x
2025-109.9x₹6867 cr9.9%13.0%0.4x
2025-0910.1x₹6867 cr9.9%13.0%0.4x
2025-088.5x₹7321 cr12.3%13.0%0.4x
2025-079.7x₹7321 cr12.3%13.0%0.4x
2025-0611.5x₹7321 cr12.3%13.0%0.4x
2025-058.3x₹7624 cr15.0%16.0%0.5x
2025-047.8x₹7624 cr15.0%16.0%0.5x
2025-037.9x₹7624 cr15.0%16.0%0.5x
2025-026.5x₹7713 cr17.0%16.0%0.5x
2025-019.0x₹7713 cr17.0%16.0%0.5x
2024-129.8x₹7713 cr17.0%16.0%0.5x
2024-1110.4x₹7804 cr17.4%16.0%0.5x
2024-1011.2x₹7804 cr17.4%16.0%0.5x
2024-0914.4x₹7804 cr17.4%16.0%0.5x
2024-0817.4x₹7477 cr14.5%16.0%0.5x
2024-0717.6x₹7477 cr14.5%16.0%0.5x
2024-0614.1x₹7477 cr14.5%16.0%0.5x
2024-0530.3x₹7276 cr7.2%10.0%0.6x
2024-0436.2x₹7276 cr7.2%10.0%0.6x
2024-0333.6x₹7276 cr7.2%10.0%0.6x
2024-0230.1x₹7276 cr7.2%10.0%0.6x
2024-0133.0x₹7276 cr7.2%10.0%0.6x
2023-1220.8x₹7276 cr7.2%10.0%0.6x
2023-1122.2x₹7276 cr7.2%10.0%0.6x
2023-1016.0x₹7276 cr7.2%10.0%0.6x
2023-0913.4x₹7276 cr7.2%10.0%0.6x
2023-0812.9x₹7276 cr7.2%10.0%0.6x
2023-0711.1x₹7276 cr7.2%10.0%0.6x
2023-0611.3x₹7276 cr7.2%10.0%0.6x
2023-058.0x₹5281 cr8.5%10.0%0.7x
2023-046.5x₹5281 cr8.5%10.0%0.7x
2023-035.5x₹5281 cr8.5%10.0%0.7x
2023-025.8x₹5281 cr8.5%10.0%0.7x
2023-016.3x₹5281 cr8.5%10.0%0.7x
2022-126.6x₹5281 cr8.5%10.0%0.7x
2022-116.8x₹5281 cr8.5%10.0%0.7x
2022-106.9x₹5281 cr8.5%10.0%0.7x
2022-096.2x₹5281 cr8.5%10.0%0.7x
2022-086.3x₹5281 cr8.5%10.0%0.7x
2022-076.2x₹5281 cr8.5%10.0%0.7x
2022-065.3x₹5281 cr8.5%10.0%0.7x
2022-05—₹3474 cr-2.4%8.0%0.6x
2022-04—₹3474 cr-2.4%8.0%0.6x
2022-03—₹3474 cr-2.4%8.0%0.6x
2022-02—₹3474 cr-2.4%8.0%0.6x
2022-01—₹3474 cr-2.4%8.0%0.6x
2021-12—₹3474 cr-2.4%8.0%0.6x
2021-11—₹3474 cr-2.4%8.0%0.6x
2021-10—₹3474 cr-2.4%8.0%0.6x
2021-09—₹3474 cr-2.4%8.0%0.6x
2021-08—₹3474 cr-2.4%8.0%0.6x
2021-07—₹3474 cr-2.4%8.0%0.6x
2021-06—₹3474 cr-2.4%8.0%0.6x
2021-058.7x₹2711 cr5.6%8.0%0.6x
2021-049.2x₹2711 cr5.6%8.0%0.6x
2021-036.7x₹2711 cr5.6%8.0%0.6x
2021-026.6x₹2711 cr5.6%8.0%0.6x
2021-015.8x₹2711 cr5.6%8.0%0.6x
2020-126.2x₹2711 cr5.6%8.0%0.6x
2020-116.1x₹2711 cr5.6%8.0%0.6x
2020-105.8x₹2711 cr5.6%8.0%0.6x
2020-095.5x₹2711 cr5.6%8.0%0.6x
2020-084.0x₹2711 cr5.6%8.0%0.6x
2020-073.8x₹2711 cr5.6%8.0%0.6x
2020-063.9x₹2711 cr5.6%8.0%0.6x
2020-0510.1x₹2699 cr1.5%9.0%0.7x
2020-0411.3x₹2699 cr1.5%9.0%0.7x
2020-039.9x₹2699 cr1.5%9.0%0.7x
2020-0214.5x₹2699 cr1.5%9.0%0.7x
2020-0115.8x₹2699 cr1.5%9.0%0.7x
2019-1212.9x₹2699 cr1.5%9.0%0.7x
2019-1112.2x₹2699 cr1.5%9.0%0.7x
2019-1014.3x₹2699 cr1.5%9.0%0.7x
2019-0915.8x₹2699 cr1.5%9.0%0.7x
2019-0815.4x₹2699 cr1.5%9.0%0.7x
2019-0713.5x₹2699 cr1.5%9.0%0.7x
2019-0617.4x₹2699 cr1.5%9.0%0.7x
2019-055.3x₹2263 cr5.0%6.0%0.7x
2019-045.6x₹2263 cr5.0%6.0%0.7x
2019-035.7x₹2263 cr5.0%6.0%0.7x
2019-025.5x₹2263 cr5.0%6.0%0.7x
2019-016.1x₹2263 cr5.0%6.0%0.7x

Methodology and data notes

Methodology

Methodology and data notes

All figures come from public exchange prices and screener.in financial statements. Quarterly and annual results are shown from 60 days after the period end, so a month never uses a result before it would plausibly have been published. Statements are the latest versions, which may include later restatements.

Sector medians, percentiles and indices use today's listed companies in the sector (survivorship bias). Prices are adjusted for splits and bonus issues; around a corporate action the fundamentals may lag the price by up to a month, and affected sections are hidden.

The return decomposition uses price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count. The reverse DCF uses a fixed 12% cost of equity, a 10-year horizon and a 15x terminal P/E, and is an illustration only. Events, flags and twins follow fixed rules and thresholds described next to each section.

Feedback