अApnaFunda

LANDMARK CARS LIMITED (LANDMARK)

Retail Trade · Specialty Stores · figures to Nov '26

Quality scoreHow the business itself ranks against its sector peers on profitability, 3-year growth and leverage. 50 is the middle of the sector.27 / 100
Profitability 39Growth 33Balance sheet 10
Momentum scoreHow strong the recent trend is: 3-month price change, 12-month improvement in earnings and the rise in FII + DII holding, among companies above ₹500 cr.56 / 100
Price 22Earnings 69FII/DII 79

Share price

Closing priceAdjusted for splits and bonus issues.

₹470.75 latest close · +4.8% over the last 90 sessions

₹450₹500₹550Jul 3Jul 29Aug 24Sep 17Oct 14Nov 9 ₹450₹500₹550Jul 3Sep 4Nov 9

₹470.75 month-end · −11.8% over 12 months

₹400₹500Nov '25Jan '26Apr '26Jun '26Sep '26Nov '26 ₹400₹500Nov '25May '26Nov '26

₹470.75 month-end · −40.0% over 3 years

₹400₹600₹800Nov '23Jun '24Jan '25Sep '25Apr '26Nov '26 ₹400₹600₹800Nov '23May '25Nov '26

₹470.75 month-end · +1.5% since Dec '22

₹400₹600₹800Dec '22Sep '23Jul '24Apr '25Feb '26Nov '26 ₹400₹600₹800Dec '22Dec '24Nov '26

52-week range ₹339.50 to ₹628.25 · 1-year volatility 45.4%

Was the rally earned?

-12%share price, 1 yearLower P/E held it back

Earnings helped, the multiple did not.

  • Per-share earnings added 77 points, but investors now pay less per rupee of profit (P/E 112.2x to 43.4x), which took 89 points back.
  • The share count fell 6%.
Net profit growth: +72 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+72 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: −89 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−89 ptsP/E changeShare count change: +6 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.+6 ptsShare count changeShare price: −12%−12%Share priceNet profit growth: +72 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+72ProfitP/E change: −89 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−89P/EShare count change: +6 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.+6SharesShare price: −12%−12%Share price
Net profit growth+72 ptsNet profit rose about 114%, which lifts the price.
P/E change-89 ptsThe P/E fell from 112.2x to 43.4x, which lowers the price.
Share count change+6 ptsShare count fell 6%, which lifts the price.
-40%share price, 3 yearsEarnings-driven

Mostly earnings.

  • Per-share earnings took off 53 points, while the multiple moved less (P/E 36.8x to 43.4x).
  • The share count rose 4%.
Net profit growth: −50 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).−50 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: +13 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+13 ptsP/E changeShare count change: −3 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−3 ptsShare count changeShare price: −40%−40%Share priceNet profit growth: −50 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).−50ProfitP/E change: +13 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+13P/EShare count change: −3 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−3SharesShare price: −40%−40%Share price
Net profit growth-50 ptsNet profit fell about 47%, which lowers the price.
P/E change+13 ptsThe P/E rose from 36.8x to 43.4x, which lifts the price.
Share count change-3 ptsShare count rose 4%, which lowers the price.
What do "pts" mean?

"pts" are percentage points of the share price return. The parts add up to the total shown for each period. Because price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count, higher profit pushes the price up, a higher P/E pushes it up, and more shares push it down.

Example: if the price rose 34% and profit growth accounts for +58 pts while a lower P/E accounts for -24 pts, then 58 - 24 = 34. The +58 is not the profit growth rate itself: it is the part of the price move that profit growth explains.

Not shown for 5 years: earnings were negative at one end, or there is not enough history.

Net profit is trailing twelve months as reported with a 60-day lag.

Compare this with AVENUE SUPERMARTS LTD DMART

How rough has the ride been?

Maximum drawdown-59.5%not yet recovered
1-year volatility45.4%annualised
Beta vs sector index0.693-year daily, correlation 0.31
Volume spikes9last 90 sessions, 5x the 50-day median

Drawdown from peak

0%−20%−40%−60%202420252026−59.5% 0%−20%−40%−60%202420252026−59.5%
Largest drawdowns

-59.5% (2023-12 peak to 2026-01 low, not yet recovered)

-24.5% (2023-01 peak to 2023-03 low, recovered 2023-05)

-16.8% (2023-10 peak to 2023-11 low, recovered 2023-12)

Most recent volume spikes

2026-10-14: 36.7x the 50-day median, price +3.9% that day

2026-09-30: 8.5x the 50-day median, price -2.3% that day

2026-09-29: 149.4x the 50-day median, price +2.3% that day

Beta is the slope of daily returns against a market-cap-weighted index of the sector's other listed companies, built from today's constituents (so it excludes companies no longer listed).

Is it expensive against its own past and its peers?

43.4xP/E todayWithin its usual range
Against its own history44th percentile
CheapestMedian 47.9xDearest

Usual range 32.8x to 116.2x since 2022-12.

Against Retail Trade43.4x vs 22.4x
This company
43.4x
Sector median
22.4x

94% above the Retail Trade median.

19.8x65.3x110.8x156.2xDec '22Oct '23Aug '24Jun '25Apr '26Nov '2619.8x65.3x110.8x156.2xDec '22Apr '24Aug '25Nov '26
P/E (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianRetail Trade median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/B (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianRetail Trade median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/S (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianRetail Trade median
How to read this

Shaded band: 10th to 90th percentile of the company's own P/E history; dotted line: its median; orange line: sector median (companies with a positive multiple, at least 5 in the sector).

Sector figures are built from today's listed companies, so they exclude companies that are no longer listed.

All terms explained in the glossary →

How Retail Trade is valued

Where does it rank among Retail Trade peers?

Each cell is the company's percentile rank among its Retail Trade peers (non-financial companies) that month.
Darker is better-ranked.
Rows marked ↓ are inverted (lower debt, shorter cash cycle and a lower P/E rank higher).

Where it ranks today

  • ROCE44th▲ 10 pts vs a year ago
  • Op. margin34th▲ 6 pts vs a year ago
  • Revenue growth62nd▼ 18 pts vs a year ago
  • EPS growth93rd▲ 82 pts vs a year ago
  • Debt/equity ↓8th▼ 4 pts vs a year ago
  • Cash cycle ↓69th▲ 11 pts vs a year ago
  • P/E ↓38th▲ 24 pts vs a year ago
  • 12M momentum57th▼ 5 pts vs a year ago

Rank history

ROCE
Op. margin
Revenue growth
EPS growth
Debt/equity ↓
Cash cycle ↓
P/E ↓
12M momentum
Dec '21Jul '22Jan '23Jul '23Jan '24Jul '24Jan '25Jul '25Jan '26Jul '26Nov '26
Lower rank Higher rank Not enough data

Percentiles use today's listed companies in the sector and need at least 5 peers with a value; grey cells have too few.
ROE is computed from net profit and book value where the source does not report it.

The Retail Trade sector page Watch it move against Retail Trade in the Observatory

What is the price implying?

~22%annual earnings growth implied by the price

At a P/E of 38.0x, the price would imply about 22.3%/yr earnings growth for 10 years under the same assumptions, but it is not ranked.

Fewer than six years of annual earnings are available, which is too little to measure delivered growth.

“Implied growth” is what the current price would require under our stated assumptions, not what we expect.

What prices imply across Retail Trade The market-wide Expectations lists

Key figures

Share Priceclose 9 Nov
₹470.75
P/E
43.4x
ROCE
9.0%
Market Cap
₹1953 cr
Revenue (TTM)
₹5137 cr
P/S
0.4x
P/B
3.3x
ROE
7.7%
Operating Margin
6.0%
Debt / Equity
1.5x
Promoter Holding
49.9%
12M Momentum
-11.8%

52-week range

₹339.50₹628.25
45% of the way from its 52-week low to its high

Price risk

1Y volatility
45.4%
Beta vs sector
1-year daily
0.88

Balance sheet & cash

Interest cover
operating profit ÷ interest
1.8x
Cash from profit, 3Y
operating cash flow ÷ net profit
4.11x
Share count, 1Y
unchanged

Are profits backed by cash?

6 of 7checks within range1 near a threshold
Other income reliance22%Near threshold

Other income as a share of pre-tax profit (trailing twelve months): 21.7%. Bands: below 15%, 15% to 35%, above 35%.

Tax rate27%Within range

Median quarterly effective tax rate over about 2.5 years: 26.5%. Bands: 15% to 35%, 5% to 15% or 35% to 50%, outside 5% to 50%.

Cash conversion4.11xWithin range

Operating cash flow divided by net profit over the last three fiscal years: 4.11x (cash from operations ₹460 cr, net profit ₹112 cr). Bands: 0.8x and above, 0.5x to 0.8x, below 0.5x.

Free cash flow4 of 5 yrsWithin range

Fiscal years with positive free cash flow in the last 5: 4. Bands: at least 80% of years, 40% to 80%, below 40%.

Receivable days vs history-3 daysWithin range

Debtor days are below the median of the previous three fiscal years by 3 days (12 vs 15). Bands: under 15 days, 15 to 45, over 45.

Capital work in progress0% of fixed assetsWithin range

Capital work-in-progress is 0% of fixed assets. Bands: not rising or up to 30%; rising for three years and above 30%; rising and above 60%.

Payable days-6 days / 2 yrsWithin range

Days payable changed by -6 over two years. Bands: rise of up to 30 days; more than 30 days.

Tap a check to see how it is measured

How to read this

Each check is a named rule with fixed thresholds, not a score. Annual statements are the latest restated figures, so a past year may differ from what was originally reported.

All terms explained in the glossary →

Who has been buying and selling?

  • Over 3 years, FIIs trimmed 5.9 pts; DIIs added 5.2 pts; promoters trimmed 2.9 pts.
  • The number of shareholders rose from 30,360 to 38,178 (+26%) between Sep 2023 and Jun 2026.

Holdings, Jun '26

How each group changed

GroupSep '23Jun '26Change
Promoters52.9%49.9%-2.9 pts
FIIs8.6%2.7%-5.9 pts
DIIs15.5%20.7%+5.2 pts
Public and others23.0%26.7%+3.7 pts

Number of shareholders

38,178shareholders+26% since Sep '23
30k36k41k46k Sep '23Jun '24Mar '25Dec '25Jun '26
Sep '23: 30,360
Dec '23: 33,397
Mar '24: 36,700
Jun '24: 38,529
Sep '24: 46,214
Dec '24: 43,717
Mar '25: 44,256
Jun '25: 42,539
Sep '25: 39,430
Dec '25: 37,870
Mar '26: 37,961
Jun '26: 38,178
30k36k41k46k Sep '23Sep '24Sep '25Jun '26
Sep '23: 30,360
Dec '23: 33,397
Mar '24: 36,700
Jun '24: 38,529
Sep '24: 46,214
Dec '24: 43,717
Mar '25: 44,256
Jun '25: 42,539
Sep '25: 39,430
Dec '25: 37,870
Mar '26: 37,961
Jun '26: 38,178

Quarterly shareholding as reported, labelled by the quarter it covers (it becomes visible about two months later).
Shareholder counts are only available for recent quarters.

This quarter's smart-money board

What happened next to similar setups

+5.3%typical 12-month return vs the marketNot meaningfully different from the base rate
  • We found 50 past situations where a non-financial company looked like LANDMARK CARS LIMITED today on valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, price momentum, size and volatility.
  • Over the following 12 months the middle half of them returned −29% to +55% vs the market, against −6% for all non-financial companies in the same months.
  • The gap against the base rate (+11.7%, 80% range −9.2% to +30.9%) is within what chance and overlapping periods produce.

Where the 50 outcomes landed

−100%−50%0%+50%+100%
SARVESHWAR · Jul 2025: −58.1% vs market
RAYMOND · Jan 2020: −58.0% vs market
HITECH · Dec 2024: −45.4% vs market
STLTECH · Jan 2023: −43.0% vs market
DUCON · Sep 2024: −39.7% vs market
PDSL · Feb 2025: −39.5% vs market
COASTCORP · Jul 2024: −38.1% vs market
DCMNVL · Jan 2025: −36.5% vs market
NELCAST · Feb 2024: −34.4% vs market
KANORICHEM · Feb 2023: −32.7% vs market
SKIPPER · Aug 2021: −32.4% vs market
RPSGVENT · Dec 2024: −30.9% vs market
AUTOIND · Dec 2023: −30.1% vs market
WHEELS · Jul 2023: −25.2% vs market
UFLEX · Jul 2025: −24.5% vs market
MSPL · Jul 2021: −23.9% vs market
TNPL · May 2023: −23.3% vs market
JINDWORLD · Jun 2020: −18.8% vs market
ESTER · Oct 2025: −16.1% vs market
RCF · Jan 2020: −15.8% vs market
PRSMJOHNSN · May 2023: −13.7% vs market
KHADIM · Jan 2024: −8.9% vs market
NAHARSPING · Jun 2025: −6.7% vs market
DBL · Jul 2024: −1.4% vs market
GULPOLY · Jun 2025: +4.5% vs market
EMIL · Oct 2025: +6.2% vs market
JAYBARMARU · May 2023: +6.5% vs market
MUNJALAU · Sep 2025: +9.1% vs market
NRAIL · Jul 2025: +23.1% vs market
MEGASTAR · Aug 2025: +25.2% vs market
GRAVITA · Feb 2020: +27.5% vs market
CEATLTD · Apr 2024: +27.6% vs market
TBZ · Sep 2022: +28.2% vs market
ELECTCAST · Feb 2020: +32.9% vs market
RICOAUTO · Aug 2025: +34.4% vs market
JKTYRE · Sep 2022: +44.0% vs market
SANGAMIND · Aug 2025: +49.8% vs market
JSL · Mar 2020: +56.0% vs market
RML · Sep 2025: +65.2% vs market
DEEPAKFERT · Mar 2020: +67.7% vs market
BODALCHEM · Aug 2025: +70.7% vs market
NETWORK18 · Apr 2021: +76.4% vs market
PATELENG · Apr 2023: +90.2% vs market
THANGAMAYL · Aug 2022: +100.2% vs market
MANGLMCEM · Aug 2023: +102.4% vs market
CENTUM · May 2022: +108.9% vs market
SALSTEEL · Mar 2025: +118.2% vs market
JBMA · Jun 2021: +147.5% vs market
NITINSPIN · Dec 2020: +174.6% vs market
TARIL · Jun 2022: +196.7% vs market
Similar setups +5.3%All companies −6.4%← worse than the marketbetter than the market →

Each dot is one past situation (hover or tap for details) · Solid dots are the closest matches, listed below · Shaded is the middle half of all companies in the same months · 7 beyond the range shown, drawn at the edge

Similar setups' median
+5.3%
All companies' median
−6.4%
Beat the market
52% vs 43%

50 past situations · 50 companies · 34 months · 2020–2025

The closest matches

CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
RML
Producer Manufacturing
Sep 2025 39x11% −29%−32% +65%
RPSGVENT
Finance
Dec 2024 —12% +40%−17% −31%
SANGAMIND
Process Industries
Aug 2025 53x7% −11%−24% +50%
STLTECH
Electronic Technology
Jan 2023 51x8% −11%−23% −43%
DEEPAKFERT
Process Industries
Mar 2020 11x6% −43%−53% +68%
Show the other 3 matches
CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
SARVESHWAR
Process Industries
Jul 2025 33x12% −13%−31% −58%
MEGASTAR
Process Industries
Aug 2025 70x9% −22%−28% +25%
BODALCHEM
Process Industries
Aug 2025 44x6% −21%−25% +71%
How reliable is this?

Matched on P/E, P/S, ROCE, operating margin, debt/equity, interest cover, revenue growth, 12-month momentum, drawdown from 12-month high, size and volatility. Closest on: drawdown from 12-month high, interest cover and 12-month momentum. One match per company and at most 7 from any one month.

Independent periods: the matches fall in 6 distinct 12-month windows. Matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, so fewer windows means less evidence.

How this is built

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to LANDMARK CARS LIMITED. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

Methodology

How historical analogs are built

Data as of 2026-11-09. Outcome pool: Jan 2020 to Oct 2025.

For every company we look at the situation it is in today (valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, 12-month price momentum, drawdown, size and volatility) and find past company-months that looked most like it. We then show what happened to those past situations over the following 12 months, measured against the ApnaFunda All index and against the base rate. It describes history. It does not predict anything.

What is compared

FeatureWeightNon-financialFinancial
P/E1yesyes
P/S1yes—
P/B1—yes
ROCE1yes—
operating margin1yes—
ROE1—yes
debt/equity0.75yes—
interest cover0.5yes—
revenue growth0.75yesyes
12-month momentum1yesyes
drawdown from 12-month high0.75yesyes
size0.75yesyes
volatility0.5yesyes

Weights were set by judgement before any outcome was looked at and are never tuned on results. Loss-making companies (negative P/E or net profit) are only matched with other loss-making companies. Banks, NBFCs and insurers are compared only with each other and use a different feature set. Every feature is converted, month by month, to its rank among companies in the same pool in that month, so a P/E of 30 in a hot market and a P/E of 22 in a cold one can match if both were equally expensive for their time. Only that month's data is used.

How closeness and the sample are defined

Distance is the weighted root-mean-square gap between the standardised features both companies have. A match needs at least 70% of the query's feature weight, a distance of at most 0.9, and 30 matches at minimum to be shown. We keep up to 50 matches with these exclusions: never the company itself, one match per company (its closest month), and at most 7 from any one calendar month so a single market episode cannot dominate.

Base rate

The base rate is the distribution of 12-month returns, relative to the market, of every eligible company-month in the same pool, with each month weighted to match the months the analogs came from. It answers: how did a random company do in these same months? Because matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, we also report the number of distinct 12-month windows behind a result, and a bootstrap that resamples months decides whether the analog median differs from the base rate at all. "Not meaningfully different" is the usual outcome and the page copy is written for it.

Limits you should know

  • One market period. The outcome pool covers 2020–2025 only (70 months), including the 2020 crash and the 2020–21 rally.
  • Survivorship. Only companies listed today are included. Delisted and bankrupt companies are missing, which flatters past outcomes, particularly for distressed-looking setups.
  • Price return only. Dividends are excluded, and the benchmark is an ApnaFunda market-cap-weighted index of the same listed companies, not an official index.
  • Reporting lag. Fundamentals are matched on an assumed 60-day lag after the quarter end, not on real announcement dates.
  • Pools: non-financial: 98,395 company-months from 2019 companies; financial: 5,659 company-months from 108 companies. 2349 companies currently have a result; the rest are suppressed because too few comparable situations exist.

Does it work? A walk-forward check

The walk-forward check has not been run for this build, so skill is shown as not yet measured.

Disclaimer

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to any company shown. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

What else looks like this?

Companies with the most similar financial profile today, regardless of industry.

Producer Manufacturing
68%similar
EPS growthP/E
Non-Energy Minerals
65%similar
promoter holdingrevenue growth
Producer Manufacturing
64%similar
ROCEP/E
TVS SRICHAKRATVSSRICHAK
Consumer Durables
64%similar
ROCEpromoter holding
PDSPDSL
Consumer Non-Durables
62%similar
EPS growthP/E
Retail Trade
49%similar
debt/equityvolatility
Retail Trade
49%similar
P/Erevenue
Retail Trade
43%similar
debt/equityROCE

Similarity is statistical, based on reported metrics; it does not imply similar business quality or future returns.

What changed?

30 events since Jun '23

  1. OctPriceVolume reached 36.7x its 50-day median on 2026-10-14; price +3.9% that day.
  2. JulPriceVolume reached 299.4x its 50-day median on 2026-07-15; price +3.6% that day.
  3. JunResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned positive.
  4. JunPeer rankMoved into the top quartile of Retail Trade on EPS growth (from the 3rd quartile).
  5. MayPriceVolume reached 17.4x its 50-day median on 2026-05-27; price -4.5% that day.
  6. MarInstitutionsFII + DII holding rose 3.9 pts over 2 quarters to 26.3%.
  7. MarPeer rankMoved into the 3rd quartile of Retail Trade on EPS growth (from the bottom quartile).
  8. JanPriceFell 60% from the Dec 2023 peak to the Jan 2026 low.
Show 22 earlier events
  1. JanPriceVolume reached 45.3x its 50-day median on 2026-01-22; price -2.0% that day.
  2. OctPriceVolume reached 93.2x its 50-day median on 2025-10-14; price +10.6% that day.
  3. SepPeer rankMoved into the 3rd quartile of Retail Trade on operating margin (from the bottom quartile).
  4. AugPriceVolume reached 12.1x its 50-day median on 2025-08-21; price +5.6% that day.
  5. JunPeer rankSlipped to the bottom quartile of Retail Trade on operating margin (from the 3rd quartile).
  6. JunPriceVolume reached 75.4x its 50-day median on 2025-06-19; price +4.6% that day.
  7. JanSharesShare count is up 5.0% over 12 months.
  8. JanPriceVolume reached 5.2x its 50-day median on 2025-01-17; price +0.4% that day.
  9. DecValuationP/E crossed above the 90th percentile of its own history to date (81.5x).
  10. SepResultsRevenue (TTM) reached a new high of ₹3,426 cr.
  11. JulPriceVolume reached 6.3x its 50-day median on 2024-07-16; price +3.6% that day.
  12. JunResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned negative.
  13. JunPeer rankSlipped to the 3rd quartile of Retail Trade on ROCE (from the top quartile).
  14. JunDebtDebt / equity rose above 1.0x (1.16x).
  15. MarPriceVolume reached 8.3x its 50-day median on 2024-03-01; price +5.4% that day.
  16. DecDebtDebt / equity halved over 12 months to 0.91x.
  17. DecSharesShare count is up 11.1% over 12 months.
  18. DecPriceVolume reached 15.1x its 50-day median on 2023-12-18; price +8.7% that day.
  19. SepPriceVolume reached 21.4x its 50-day median on 2023-09-08; price +11.7% that day.
  20. JunDebtDebt / equity fell below 1.0x (0.91x).
  21. JunDividendStarted paying a dividend (payout 11% of profit).
  22. JunPriceVolume reached 34.2x its 50-day median on 2023-06-23; price +8.3% that day.

Events are generated from the data by fixed rules.
The month shown is when the change became visible in the reported figures, assuming a 60-day lag after each quarter end; it is not an announcement date.

Where price and fundamentals disagree, market-wide Rewind the whole market to any month

Monthly history48 months · 2022-12 to 2026-11
MonthP/ERevenue (TTM)ROEROCEDebt / Equity
2026-1143.4x₹5137 cr7.7%9.0%1.5x
2026-1040.4x₹5137 cr7.9%9.0%1.5x
2026-0943.9x₹5137 cr7.9%9.0%1.5x
2026-0857.5x₹4897 cr6.5%9.0%1.5x
2026-0760.1x₹4897 cr6.5%9.0%1.5x
2026-0648.6x₹4897 cr6.5%9.0%1.5x
2026-0566.3x₹4709 cr4.5%8.0%1.6x
2026-0470.4x₹4709 cr4.5%8.0%1.6x
2026-0363.4x₹4709 cr4.5%8.0%1.6x
2026-0281.8x₹4559 cr4.2%8.0%1.6x
2026-0177.3x₹4559 cr4.2%8.0%1.6x
2025-1293.5x₹4559 cr4.2%8.0%1.6x
2025-11112.2x₹4255 cr3.8%8.0%1.6x
2025-10131.6x₹4255 cr3.8%8.0%1.6x
2025-09125.7x₹4255 cr3.8%8.0%1.6x
2025-08156.2x₹4025 cr3.1%8.0%1.6x
2025-07128.6x₹4025 cr3.1%8.0%1.6x
2025-06134.9x₹4025 cr3.1%8.0%1.6x
2025-0575.5x₹3798 cr4.8%12.0%1.2x
2025-0467.7x₹3798 cr4.8%12.0%1.2x
2025-0361.8x₹3798 cr4.8%12.0%1.2x
2025-0257.4x₹3562 cr5.9%12.0%1.2x
2025-0164.5x₹3562 cr5.9%12.0%1.2x
2024-1281.5x₹3562 cr5.9%12.0%1.2x
2024-1151.4x₹3426 cr9.6%12.0%1.2x
2024-1047.2x₹3426 cr9.6%12.0%1.2x
2024-0951.9x₹3426 cr9.6%12.0%1.2x
2024-0842.2x₹3288 cr10.4%12.0%1.2x
2024-0745.7x₹3288 cr10.4%12.0%1.2x
2024-0652.9x₹3288 cr10.4%12.0%1.2x
2024-0531.0x₹3382 cr18.1%20.0%0.9x
2024-0437.2x₹3382 cr18.1%20.0%0.9x
2024-0334.4x₹3382 cr18.1%20.0%0.9x
2024-0233.8x₹3382 cr18.1%20.0%0.9x
2024-0139.2x₹3382 cr18.1%20.0%0.9x
2023-1239.1x₹3382 cr18.1%20.0%0.9x
2023-1136.8x₹3382 cr18.1%20.0%0.9x
2023-1033.3x₹3382 cr18.1%20.0%0.9x
2023-0936.7x₹3382 cr18.1%20.0%0.9x
2023-0833.1x₹3382 cr18.1%20.0%0.9x
2023-0734.2x₹3382 cr18.1%20.0%0.9x
2023-0633.4x₹3382 cr18.1%20.0%0.9x
2023-0539.3x₹2977 cr26.7%19.0%1.9x
2023-0432.3x₹2977 cr26.7%19.0%1.9x
2023-0330.4x₹2977 cr26.7%19.0%1.9x
2023-0230.1x₹2977 cr26.7%19.0%1.9x
2023-0134.9x₹2977 cr26.7%19.0%1.9x
2022-1225.9x₹2977 cr26.7%19.0%1.9x

Methodology and data notes

Methodology

Methodology and data notes

All figures come from public exchange prices and screener.in financial statements. Quarterly and annual results are shown from 60 days after the period end, so a month never uses a result before it would plausibly have been published. Statements are the latest versions, which may include later restatements.

Sector medians, percentiles and indices use today's listed companies in the sector (survivorship bias). Prices are adjusted for splits and bonus issues; around a corporate action the fundamentals may lag the price by up to a month, and affected sections are hidden.

The return decomposition uses price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count. The reverse DCF uses a fixed 12% cost of equity, a 10-year horizon and a 15x terminal P/E, and is an illustration only. Events, flags and twins follow fixed rules and thresholds described next to each section.

Feedback