अApnaFunda

DYNAMATIC TECHNOLOGIES LTD (DYNAMATECH)

Producer Manufacturing · Industrial Machinery · figures to Nov '26

Quality scoreHow the business itself ranks against its sector peers on profitability, 3-year growth and leverage. 50 is the middle of the sector.32 / 100
Profitability 44Growth 33Balance sheet 21
Momentum scoreHow strong the recent trend is: 3-month price change, 12-month improvement in earnings and the rise in FII + DII holding, among companies above ₹500 cr.68 / 100
Price 88Earnings 60FII/DII 57

Share price

Closing priceAdjusted for splits and bonus issues.

₹12,937 latest close · +25.7% over the last 90 sessions

₹10,000₹12,000₹14,000Jul 3Jul 29Aug 24Sep 17Oct 14Nov 9 ₹10,000₹12,000₹14,000Jul 3Sep 4Nov 9

₹12,937 month-end · +39.9% over 12 months

₹10,000₹12,000₹14,000Nov '25Jan '26Apr '26Jun '26Sep '26Nov '26 ₹10,000₹12,000₹14,000Nov '25May '26Nov '26

₹12,937 month-end · +198.8% over 3 years

₹5,000₹10,000Nov '23Jun '24Jan '25Sep '25Apr '26Nov '26 ₹5,000₹10,000Nov '23May '25Nov '26

₹12,937 month-end · +844.0% since Jan '19

₹0₹5,000₹10,000Jan '19Aug '20Mar '22Sep '23Apr '25Nov '26 ₹0₹5,000₹10,000Jan '19Dec '22Nov '26

52-week range ₹7673.00 to ₹14498.00 · 1-year volatility 46.3%

Was the rally earned?

+40%share price, 1 yearMultiple-driven

Partly.

  • Most of the rise came from investors paying a higher multiple (P/E 138.2x to 193.3x); per-share earnings added 0 points.
  • The share count barely moved.
P/E change: +40 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+40 ptsP/E changeShare price: +40%+40%Share priceP/E change: +40 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+40P/EShare price: +40%+40%Share price
Net profit growth0 ptsNet profit was little changed.
P/E change+40 ptsThe P/E rose from 138.2x to 193.3x, which lifts the price.
Share count change0 ptsShare count was little changed. More shares would count against the price.
+199%share price, 3 yearsMultiple-driven

Partly.

  • Most of the rise came from investors paying a higher multiple (P/E 64.2x to 193.3x); per-share earnings took off 1 point.
  • The share count barely moved.
P/E change: +200 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+200 ptsP/E changeShare count change: −1 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−1 ptsShare count changeShare price: +199%+199%Share priceP/E change: +200 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+200P/EShare count change: −1 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−1SharesShare price: +199%+199%Share price
Net profit growth0 ptsNet profit was little changed.
P/E change+200 ptsThe P/E rose from 64.2x to 193.3x, which lifts the price.
Share count change-1 ptsShare count was little changed. More shares would count against the price.
What do "pts" mean?

"pts" are percentage points of the share price return. The parts add up to the total shown for each period. Because price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count, higher profit pushes the price up, a higher P/E pushes it up, and more shares push it down.

Example: if the price rose 34% and profit growth accounts for +58 pts while a lower P/E accounts for -24 pts, then 58 - 24 = 34. The +58 is not the profit growth rate itself: it is the part of the price move that profit growth explains.

Not shown for 5 years: earnings were negative at one end, or there is not enough history.

Net profit is trailing twelve months as reported with a 60-day lag.

Compare this with WELSPUN CORP

How rough has the ride been?

Maximum drawdown-72.1%recovered 2021-07
1-year volatility46.3%annualised
Beta vs sector index1.033-year daily, correlation 0.48
Volume spikes0last 90 sessions, 5x the 50-day median

Drawdown from peak

0%−20%−40%−60%2020202120222023202420252026−71.5% 0%−20%−40%−60%2020202220242026−71.5%
Largest drawdowns

-72.1% (2019-03 peak to 2020-04 low, recovered 2021-07)

-46.8% (2021-09 peak to 2022-06 low, recovered 2023-05)

-35.8% (2024-04 peak to 2025-03 low, recovered 2025-11)

Beta is the slope of daily returns against a market-cap-weighted index of the sector's other listed companies, built from today's constituents (so it excludes companies no longer listed).

Is it expensive against its own past and its peers?

193.3xP/E todayNear its historic high
Against its own history87th percentile
CheapestMedian 64.2xDearest

Usual range 12.9x to 203.1x since 2019-01.

Against Producer Manufacturing193.3x vs 29.6x
This company
193.3x
Sector median
29.6x

554% above the Producer Manufacturing median.

8.6x477.2x945.7x1414.3xJan '19Aug '20Mar '22Oct '23May '25Nov '268.6x477.2x945.7x1414.3xJan '19Sep '21May '24Nov '26
P/E (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianProducer Manufacturing median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/B (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianProducer Manufacturing median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/S (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianProducer Manufacturing median
How to read this

Shaded band: 10th to 90th percentile of the company's own P/E history; dotted line: its median; orange line: sector median (companies with a positive multiple, at least 5 in the sector).

Sector figures are built from today's listed companies, so they exclude companies that are no longer listed.

All terms explained in the glossary →

How Producer Manufacturing is valued

Where does it rank among Producer Manufacturing peers?

Each cell is the company's percentile rank among its Producer Manufacturing peers (non-financial companies) that month.
Darker is better-ranked.
Rows marked ↓ are inverted (lower debt, shorter cash cycle and a lower P/E rank higher).

Where it ranks today

  • ROCE28th▲ 5 pts vs a year ago
  • Op. margin59th▲ 18 pts vs a year ago
  • Revenue growth57th▲ 27 pts vs a year ago
  • EPS growth41st▲ 27 pts vs a year ago
  • Debt/equity ↓16thflat vs a year ago
  • Cash cycle ↓39thflat vs a year ago
  • P/E ↓3rd▼ 3 pts vs a year ago
  • 12M momentum83rd▼ 3 pts vs a year ago

Rank history

ROCE
Op. margin
Revenue growth
EPS growth
Debt/equity ↓
Cash cycle ↓
P/E ↓
12M momentum
Dec '21Jul '22Jan '23Jul '23Jan '24Jul '24Jan '25Jul '25Jan '26Jul '26Nov '26
Lower rank Higher rank Not enough data

Percentiles use today's listed companies in the sector and need at least 5 peers with a value; grey cells have too few.
ROE is computed from net profit and book value where the source does not report it.

The Producer Manufacturing sector page Watch it move against Producer Manufacturing in the Observatory

What is the price implying?

~42%annual earnings growth implied by the priceAbove delivered growth

At normalised P/E (five-year average earnings) of 163.0x, a holder earning 12%/yr needs earnings to grow about 41.9%/yr for 10 years, then trade at 15x.

Delivered19.7%/yrEPS, last 10 fiscal years · 3-yr avg to 3-yr avg
Gap+22.3 ptsimplied minus delivered
Rank115thmost demanding of 856

Over time

Implied growth by month (solid) and delivered growth (dashed).

-12%18%49% Jan 2019Nov 2026 -12%18%49% Jan 2019Nov 2026

Change the assumptions

Exit P/E / return11%12%13%
12x43.8%45.1%46.4%
15x40.7%41.9%43.2%
20x36.7%38.0%39.2%

Drag a slider to test other assumptions

Implied: 41.9%/yr

Looking back

  • Jan 2020Price implied 22%/yr; EPS has since grown 0%/yr (7.0 yrs)
  • Jan 2021Price implied 18%/yr; EPS has since grown −6%/yr (6.0 yrs)

Past comparisons cover only companies listed today (survivorship bias) and say nothing about future outcomes.

“Implied growth” is what the current price would require under our stated assumptions, not what we expect. How this is calculated and the market-wide lists.

What prices imply across Producer Manufacturing The market-wide Expectations lists

Key figures

Share Priceclose 9 Nov
₹12937.00
P/E
193.3x
ROCE
10.0%
Market Cap
₹8786 cr
Revenue (TTM)
₹1675 cr
P/S
5.2x
P/B
11.1x
ROE
5.7%
Operating Margin
13.0%
Debt / Equity
0.8x
Promoter Holding
41.5%
12M Momentum
39.9%

52-week range

₹7673.00₹14498.00
77% of the way from its 52-week low to its high

Price risk

1Y volatility
46.3%
Beta vs sector
1-year daily
1.12

Balance sheet & cash

Interest cover
operating profit ÷ interest
2.1x
Cash from profit, 3Y
operating cash flow ÷ net profit
1.71x
Share count, 1Y
unchanged

Are profits backed by cash?

7 of 7checks within rangeAll clear
Other income reliance-3%Within range

Other income as a share of pre-tax profit (trailing twelve months): -3.3%. Bands: below 15%, 15% to 35%, above 35%.

Tax rate23%Within range

Median quarterly effective tax rate over about 2.5 years: 23.0%. Bands: 15% to 35%, 5% to 15% or 35% to 50%, outside 5% to 50%.

Cash conversion1.71xWithin range

Operating cash flow divided by net profit over the last three fiscal years: 1.71x (cash from operations ₹336 cr, net profit ₹197 cr). Bands: 0.8x and above, 0.5x to 0.8x, below 0.5x.

Free cash flow5 of 5 yrsWithin range

Fiscal years with positive free cash flow in the last 5: 5. Bands: at least 80% of years, 40% to 80%, below 40%.

Receivable days vs history-3 daysWithin range

Debtor days are below the median of the previous three fiscal years by 3 days (72 vs 75). Bands: under 15 days, 15 to 45, over 45.

Capital work in progress5% of fixed assetsWithin range

Capital work-in-progress is 5% of fixed assets. Bands: not rising or up to 30%; rising for three years and above 30%; rising and above 60%.

Payable days+14 days / 2 yrsWithin range

Days payable changed by +14 over two years. Bands: rise of up to 30 days; more than 30 days.

Tap a check to see how it is measured

How to read this

Each check is a named rule with fixed thresholds, not a score. Annual statements are the latest restated figures, so a past year may differ from what was originally reported.

All terms explained in the glossary →

Who has been buying and selling?

  • Over 3 years, FIIs trimmed 6.4 pts; DIIs added 4.8 pts.
  • The number of shareholders rose from 13,221 to 25,288 (+91%) between Sep 2023 and Jun 2026.

Holdings, Jun '26

How each group changed

GroupSep '23Jun '26Change
Promoters41.9%41.5%-0.4 pts
FIIs16.7%10.3%-6.4 pts
DIIs11.0%15.9%+4.8 pts
Public and others30.4%32.4%+1.9 pts

Number of shareholders

25,288shareholders+91% since Sep '23
13k17k22k26k Sep '23Jun '24Mar '25Dec '25Jun '26
Sep '23: 13,221
Dec '23: 13,106
Mar '24: 15,845
Jun '24: 18,318
Sep '24: 19,611
Dec '24: 19,950
Mar '25: 18,737
Jun '25: 19,403
Sep '25: 19,191
Dec '25: 23,902
Mar '26: 26,206
Jun '26: 25,288
13k17k22k26k Sep '23Sep '24Sep '25Jun '26
Sep '23: 13,221
Dec '23: 13,106
Mar '24: 15,845
Jun '24: 18,318
Sep '24: 19,611
Dec '24: 19,950
Mar '25: 18,737
Jun '25: 19,403
Sep '25: 19,191
Dec '25: 23,902
Mar '26: 26,206
Jun '26: 25,288

Quarterly shareholding as reported, labelled by the quarter it covers (it becomes visible about two months later).
Shareholder counts are only available for recent quarters.

This quarter's smart-money board

What happened next to similar setups

−11.6%typical 12-month return vs the marketBelow the base rate
  • We found 50 past situations where a non-financial company looked like DYNAMATIC TECHNOLOGIES LTD today on valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, price momentum, size and volatility.
  • Over the following 12 months the middle half of them returned −31% to +25% vs the market, against −3% for all non-financial companies in the same months.
  • The analogs' median sat below that base rate (gap −8.3%, 80% range −14.8% to −2.1%), but the matches cluster in only 6 distinct 12-month windows.

Where the 50 outcomes landed

−100%−50%0%+50%+100%
HILTON · Sep 2023: −64.9% vs market
ANURAS · May 2023: −54.4% vs market
STAR · Oct 2020: −51.5% vs market
DECCANCE · Jul 2025: −50.3% vs market
HLEGLAS · Aug 2025: −44.5% vs market
ASIANTILES · Feb 2020: −44.4% vs market
TARIL · May 2025: −39.9% vs market
PPLPHARMA · Mar 2025: −37.6% vs market
YUKEN · Apr 2024: −37.5% vs market
SERVOTECH · Oct 2024: −37.5% vs market
HESTERBIO · Jul 2024: −33.6% vs market
WESTLIFE · Jun 2023: −33.0% vs market
HNDFDS · Nov 2022: −31.0% vs market
SAPPHIRE · May 2023: −30.5% vs market
IFBIND · Dec 2020: −28.7% vs market
NEOGEN · Feb 2025: −25.7% vs market
SHILPAMED · Oct 2024: −18.5% vs market
UNOMINDA · Dec 2021: −17.9% vs market
SOBHA · Feb 2024: −17.8% vs market
GREENLAM · Oct 2025: −17.5% vs market
AMBER · Jan 2025: −17.1% vs market
ARTEMISMED · Nov 2024: −16.4% vs market
ORCHPHARMA · Feb 2024: −15.3% vs market
ITI · May 2020: −14.3% vs market
MOTILALOFS · Jul 2020: −11.7% vs market
JBMA · Jan 2022: −11.6% vs market
DALBHARAT · Feb 2021: −9.1% vs market
NH · May 2020: −7.7% vs market
VBL · Jan 2020: −1.6% vs market
ESTER · Mar 2021: −0.9% vs market
RKFORGE · Oct 2021: +1.4% vs market
HIRECT · Dec 2024: +3.5% vs market
PURVA · Jan 2024: +4.5% vs market
PGEL · May 2023: +9.5% vs market
LODHA · Nov 2023: +9.9% vs market
NELCO · Sep 2021: +18.8% vs market
SOMANYCERA · Mar 2021: +22.9% vs market
AVALON · Mar 2025: +25.9% vs market
INDOCO · Jul 2020: +26.7% vs market
ELGIEQUIP · Apr 2021: +31.4% vs market
APOLLOHOSP · May 2020: +34.1% vs market
ETHOSLTD · May 2023: +38.4% vs market
ANANTRAJ · Dec 2021: +39.8% vs market
GENUSPOWER · Jul 2023: +40.2% vs market
CRAFTSMAN · Aug 2025: +50.4% vs market
BUTTERFLY · Jan 2021: +58.6% vs market
SCHNEIDER · Oct 2022: +67.3% vs market
LINDEINDIA · Feb 2020: +75.9% vs market
TARC · Sep 2023: +82.2% vs market
GVT&D · Apr 2025: +167.3% vs market
Similar setups −11.6%All companies −3.3%← worse than the marketbetter than the market →

Each dot is one past situation (hover or tap for details) · Solid dots are the closest matches, listed below · Shaded is the middle half of all companies in the same months · 1 beyond the range shown, drawn at the edge

Similar setups' median
−11.6%
All companies' median
−3.3%
Beat the market
40% vs 47%

50 past situations · 50 companies · 36 months · 2020–2025

The closest matches

CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
SOBHA
Finance
Feb 2024 156x8% +172%−4% −18%
NEOGEN
Process Industries
Feb 2025 109x9% +26%−29% −26%
ITI
Electronic Technology
May 2020 80x7% −13%−21% −14%
RKFORGE
Producer Manufacturing
Oct 2021 169x6% +191%−10% +1%
JBMA
Producer Manufacturing
Jan 2022 146x9% +304%−7% −12%
Show the other 3 matches
CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
LINDEINDIA
Process Industries
Feb 2020 217x5% +32%−16% +76%
SCHNEIDER
Distribution Services
Oct 2022 150x14% +67%−8% +67%
APOLLOHOSP
Health Services
May 2020 80x10% +10%−25% +34%
How reliable is this?

Matched on P/E, P/S, ROCE, operating margin, debt/equity, interest cover, revenue growth, 12-month momentum, drawdown from 12-month high, size and volatility. Closest on: 12-month momentum, drawdown from 12-month high and ROCE. One match per company and at most 7 from any one month.

Independent periods: the matches fall in 6 distinct 12-month windows. Matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, so fewer windows means less evidence.

How this is built

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to DYNAMATIC TECHNOLOGIES LTD. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

Methodology

How historical analogs are built

Data as of 2026-11-09. Outcome pool: Jan 2020 to Oct 2025.

For every company we look at the situation it is in today (valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, 12-month price momentum, drawdown, size and volatility) and find past company-months that looked most like it. We then show what happened to those past situations over the following 12 months, measured against the ApnaFunda All index and against the base rate. It describes history. It does not predict anything.

What is compared

FeatureWeightNon-financialFinancial
P/E1yesyes
P/S1yes—
P/B1—yes
ROCE1yes—
operating margin1yes—
ROE1—yes
debt/equity0.75yes—
interest cover0.5yes—
revenue growth0.75yesyes
12-month momentum1yesyes
drawdown from 12-month high0.75yesyes
size0.75yesyes
volatility0.5yesyes

Weights were set by judgement before any outcome was looked at and are never tuned on results. Loss-making companies (negative P/E or net profit) are only matched with other loss-making companies. Banks, NBFCs and insurers are compared only with each other and use a different feature set. Every feature is converted, month by month, to its rank among companies in the same pool in that month, so a P/E of 30 in a hot market and a P/E of 22 in a cold one can match if both were equally expensive for their time. Only that month's data is used.

How closeness and the sample are defined

Distance is the weighted root-mean-square gap between the standardised features both companies have. A match needs at least 70% of the query's feature weight, a distance of at most 0.9, and 30 matches at minimum to be shown. We keep up to 50 matches with these exclusions: never the company itself, one match per company (its closest month), and at most 7 from any one calendar month so a single market episode cannot dominate.

Base rate

The base rate is the distribution of 12-month returns, relative to the market, of every eligible company-month in the same pool, with each month weighted to match the months the analogs came from. It answers: how did a random company do in these same months? Because matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, we also report the number of distinct 12-month windows behind a result, and a bootstrap that resamples months decides whether the analog median differs from the base rate at all. "Not meaningfully different" is the usual outcome and the page copy is written for it.

Limits you should know

  • One market period. The outcome pool covers 2020–2025 only (70 months), including the 2020 crash and the 2020–21 rally.
  • Survivorship. Only companies listed today are included. Delisted and bankrupt companies are missing, which flatters past outcomes, particularly for distressed-looking setups.
  • Price return only. Dividends are excluded, and the benchmark is an ApnaFunda market-cap-weighted index of the same listed companies, not an official index.
  • Reporting lag. Fundamentals are matched on an assumed 60-day lag after the quarter end, not on real announcement dates.
  • Pools: non-financial: 98,395 company-months from 2019 companies; financial: 5,659 company-months from 108 companies. 2349 companies currently have a result; the rest are suppressed because too few comparable situations exist.

Does it work? A walk-forward check

The walk-forward check has not been run for this build, so skill is shown as not yet measured.

Disclaimer

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to any company shown. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

What else looks like this?

Companies with the most similar financial profile today, regardless of industry.

Retail Trade
72%similar
P/Emarket cap
Process Industries
64%similar
P/Emarket cap
Consumer Services
64%similar
volatilitymarket cap
Consumer Services
63%similar
P/Eoperating margin
Process Industries
60%similar
revenuepromoter holding
GMM PFAUDLERGMMPFAUDLR
Producer Manufacturing
62%similar
debt/equitymarket cap
Producer Manufacturing
61%similar
debt/equitypromoter holding
Producer Manufacturing
55%similar
promoter holdingmarket cap

Similarity is statistical, based on reported metrics; it does not imply similar business quality or future returns.

What changed?

30 events since Jun '23

  1. SepResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned positive.
  2. SepPeer rankMoved into the 2nd quartile of Producer Manufacturing on operating margin (from the 3rd quartile).
  3. JunPeer rankMoved into the 3rd quartile of Producer Manufacturing on ROCE (from the bottom quartile).
  4. AprPriceVolume reached 5.0x its 50-day median on 2026-04-22; price +7.4% that day.
  5. MarResultsRevenue (TTM) reached a new high of ₹1,569 cr.
  6. MarPeer rankSlipped to the 3rd quartile of Producer Manufacturing on operating margin (from the 2nd quartile).
  7. DecPeer rankMoved into the 2nd quartile of Producer Manufacturing on operating margin (from the 3rd quartile).
  8. NovPriceRegained the 2024-04 peak, 8 months after the low.
Show 22 earlier events
  1. NovValuationP/E crossed above the 90th percentile of its own history to date (138.2x).
  2. OctPriceVolume reached 63.7x its 50-day median on 2025-10-09; price +12.2% that day.
  3. SepPriceVolume reached 9.7x its 50-day median on 2025-09-22; price -0.3% that day.
  4. JunResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned negative.
  5. JunPeer rankSlipped to the 3rd quartile of Producer Manufacturing on operating margin (from the 2nd quartile).
  6. JunDividendDividend payout cut from 6% to 3% of profit.
  7. JunPriceVolume reached 5.5x its 50-day median on 2025-06-17; price -0.8% that day.
  8. MarPriceFell 36% from the Apr 2024 peak to the Mar 2025 low.
  9. MarPeer rankMoved into the 2nd quartile of Producer Manufacturing on operating margin (from the 3rd quartile).
  10. DecPeer rankSlipped to the 3rd quartile of Producer Manufacturing on operating margin (from the 2nd quartile).
  11. DecPriceVolume reached 5.7x its 50-day median on 2024-12-11; price +8.0% that day.
  12. SepPriceVolume reached 15.7x its 50-day median on 2024-09-27; price +9.5% that day.
  13. AugPeer rankMoved into the 2nd quartile of Producer Manufacturing on operating margin (from the 3rd quartile).
  14. JunPeer rankSlipped to the bottom quartile of Producer Manufacturing on ROCE (from the 3rd quartile).
  15. JunDebtDebt / equity fell below 1.0x (0.88x).
  16. MayPriceVolume reached 5.3x its 50-day median on 2024-05-31; price +0.6% that day.
  17. FebPriceVolume reached 8.6x its 50-day median on 2024-02-08; price +4.4% that day.
  18. DecPriceVolume reached 15.5x its 50-day median on 2023-12-26; price +13.8% that day.
  19. SepPriceVolume reached 13.3x its 50-day median on 2023-09-18; price +6.8% that day.
  20. JunPeer rankMoved into the top quartile of Producer Manufacturing on EPS growth (from the bottom quartile).
  21. JunDividendStarted paying a dividend (payout 11% of profit).
  22. JunSharesShare count is up 16.7% over 12 months.

Events are generated from the data by fixed rules.
The month shown is when the change became visible in the reported figures, assuming a 60-day lag after each quarter end; it is not an announcement date.

Where price and fundamentals disagree, market-wide Rewind the whole market to any month

Monthly history95 months · 2019-01 to 2026-11
MonthP/ERevenue (TTM)ROEROCEDebt / Equity
2026-11193.3x₹1675 cr5.7%10.0%0.8x
2026-10173.4x₹1675 cr5.7%10.0%0.8x
2026-09203.4x₹1675 cr5.7%10.0%0.8x
2026-08234.1x₹1621 cr4.4%10.0%0.8x
2026-07202.3x₹1621 cr4.4%10.0%0.8x
2026-06203.3x₹1621 cr4.4%10.0%0.8x
2026-05196.3x₹1569 cr5.3%9.0%0.8x
2026-04204.1x₹1569 cr5.3%9.0%0.8x
2026-03159.0x₹1569 cr5.3%9.0%0.8x
2026-02188.7x₹1459 cr5.0%9.0%0.8x
2026-01165.6x₹1459 cr5.0%9.0%0.8x
2025-12176.4x₹1459 cr5.0%9.0%0.8x
2025-11138.2x₹1428 cr6.3%9.0%0.8x
2025-10118.3x₹1428 cr6.3%9.0%0.8x
2025-09102.4x₹1428 cr6.3%9.0%0.8x
2025-0894.7x₹1403 cr6.3%9.0%0.8x
2025-0797.5x₹1403 cr6.3%9.0%0.8x
2025-06105.9x₹1403 cr6.3%9.0%0.8x
2025-0551.7x₹1392 cr13.3%10.0%0.9x
2025-0447.7x₹1392 cr13.3%10.0%0.9x
2025-0346.9x₹1392 cr13.3%10.0%0.9x
2025-0246.8x₹1423 cr14.4%10.0%0.9x
2025-0148.5x₹1423 cr14.4%10.0%0.9x
2024-1258.5x₹1423 cr14.4%10.0%0.9x
2024-1153.3x₹1413 cr14.4%10.0%0.9x
2024-1051.9x₹1413 cr14.4%10.0%0.9x
2024-0955.0x₹1413 cr14.4%10.0%0.9x
2024-0841.5x₹1430 cr19.1%10.0%0.9x
2024-0737.0x₹1430 cr19.1%10.0%0.9x
2024-0638.2x₹1430 cr19.1%10.0%0.9x
2024-05115.4x₹1316 cr8.4%10.0%1.4x
2024-04122.6x₹1316 cr8.4%10.0%1.4x
2024-03110.5x₹1316 cr8.4%10.0%1.4x
2024-02105.7x₹1316 cr8.4%10.0%1.4x
2024-0194.8x₹1316 cr8.4%10.0%1.4x
2023-1275.8x₹1316 cr8.4%10.0%1.4x
2023-1164.2x₹1316 cr8.4%10.0%1.4x
2023-1059.5x₹1316 cr8.4%10.0%1.4x
2023-0960.4x₹1316 cr8.4%10.0%1.4x
2023-0856.9x₹1316 cr8.4%10.0%1.4x
2023-0758.8x₹1316 cr8.4%10.0%1.4x
2023-0656.0x₹1316 cr8.4%10.0%1.4x
2023-05143.0x₹1253 cr4.2%9.0%1.8x
2023-04119.9x₹1253 cr4.2%9.0%1.8x
2023-03113.2x₹1253 cr4.2%9.0%1.8x
2023-02104.0x₹1253 cr4.2%9.0%1.8x
2023-01101.2x₹1253 cr4.2%9.0%1.8x
2022-1299.5x₹1253 cr4.2%9.0%1.8x
2022-11108.1x₹1253 cr4.2%9.0%1.8x
2022-1098.9x₹1253 cr4.2%9.0%1.8x
2022-0993.5x₹1253 cr4.2%9.0%1.8x
2022-0892.4x₹1253 cr4.2%9.0%1.8x
2022-0773.8x₹1253 cr4.2%9.0%1.8x
2022-0674.5x₹1253 cr4.2%9.0%1.8x
2022-05—₹1118 cr-6.3%5.0%2.0x
2022-04—₹1118 cr-6.3%5.0%2.0x
2022-03—₹1118 cr-6.3%5.0%2.0x
2022-02—₹1118 cr-6.3%5.0%2.0x
2022-01—₹1118 cr-6.3%5.0%2.0x
2021-12—₹1118 cr-6.3%5.0%2.0x
2021-11—₹1118 cr-6.3%5.0%2.0x
2021-10—₹1118 cr-6.3%5.0%2.0x
2021-09—₹1118 cr-6.3%5.0%2.0x
2021-08—₹1118 cr-6.3%5.0%2.0x
2021-07—₹1118 cr-6.3%5.0%2.0x
2021-06—₹1118 cr-6.3%5.0%2.0x
2021-0521.3x₹1230 cr11.0%9.0%2.0x
2021-0416.7x₹1230 cr11.0%9.0%2.0x
2021-0315.4x₹1230 cr11.0%9.0%2.0x
2021-0214.6x₹1230 cr11.0%9.0%2.0x
2021-0112.6x₹1230 cr11.0%9.0%2.0x
2020-1213.8x₹1230 cr11.0%9.0%2.0x
2020-1111.3x₹1230 cr11.0%9.0%2.0x
2020-1010.8x₹1230 cr11.0%9.0%2.0x
2020-0911.5x₹1230 cr11.0%9.0%2.0x
2020-0813.7x₹1230 cr11.0%9.0%2.0x
2020-078.6x₹1230 cr11.0%9.0%2.0x
2020-069.8x₹1230 cr11.0%9.0%2.0x
2020-0511.6x₹1500 cr8.8%13.0%2.0x
2020-0412.7x₹1500 cr8.8%13.0%2.0x
2020-0310.7x₹1500 cr8.8%13.0%2.0x
2020-0219.7x₹1500 cr8.8%13.0%2.0x
2020-0122.5x₹1500 cr8.8%13.0%2.0x
2019-1222.5x₹1500 cr8.8%13.0%2.0x
2019-1121.8x₹1500 cr8.8%13.0%2.0x
2019-1027.0x₹1500 cr8.8%13.0%2.0x
2019-0929.4x₹1500 cr8.8%13.0%2.0x
2019-0826.1x₹1500 cr8.8%13.0%2.0x
2019-0728.9x₹1500 cr8.8%13.0%2.0x
2019-0631.8x₹1500 cr8.8%13.0%2.0x
2019-051267.1x₹1321 cr0.2%9.0%2.3x
2019-041253.2x₹1321 cr0.2%9.0%2.3x
2019-031414.3x₹1321 cr0.2%9.0%2.3x
2019-021242.1x₹1321 cr0.2%9.0%2.3x
2019-011202.1x₹1321 cr0.2%9.0%2.3x

Methodology and data notes

Methodology

Methodology and data notes

All figures come from public exchange prices and screener.in financial statements. Quarterly and annual results are shown from 60 days after the period end, so a month never uses a result before it would plausibly have been published. Statements are the latest versions, which may include later restatements.

Sector medians, percentiles and indices use today's listed companies in the sector (survivorship bias). Prices are adjusted for splits and bonus issues; around a corporate action the fundamentals may lag the price by up to a month, and affected sections are hidden.

The return decomposition uses price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count. The reverse DCF uses a fixed 12% cost of equity, a 10-year horizon and a 15x terminal P/E, and is an illustration only. Events, flags and twins follow fixed rules and thresholds described next to each section.

Feedback