अApnaFunda

DATA PATTERNS INDIA LIMITED (DATAPATTNS)

Electronic Technology · Electronic Production Equipment · figures to Nov '26

Quality scoreHow the business itself ranks against its sector peers on profitability, 3-year growth and leverage. 50 is the middle of the sector.84 / 100
Profitability 80Growth 72Balance sheet 100
Momentum scoreHow strong the recent trend is: 3-month price change, 12-month improvement in earnings and the rise in FII + DII holding, among companies above ₹500 cr.61 / 100
Price 41Earnings 48FII/DII 94

Passes these screensDebt-light & profitableLittle growth priced inConsistent compounders

Share price

Closing priceAdjusted for splits and bonus issues.

₹4,025 latest close · −10.7% over the last 90 sessions

₹4,000₹4,500₹5,000Jul 3Jul 29Aug 24Sep 17Oct 14Nov 9 ₹4,000₹4,500₹5,000Jul 3Sep 4Nov 9

₹4,025 month-end · +35.5% over 12 months

₹3,000₹4,000Nov '25Jan '26Apr '26Jun '26Sep '26Nov '26 ₹3,000₹4,000Nov '25May '26Nov '26

₹4,025 month-end · +100.0% over 3 years

₹2,000₹3,000₹4,000Nov '23Jun '24Jan '25Sep '25Apr '26Nov '26 ₹2,000₹3,000₹4,000Nov '23May '25Nov '26

₹4,025 month-end · +429.7% since Dec '21

₹2,000₹4,000Dec '21Dec '22Dec '23Nov '24Nov '25Nov '26 ₹2,000₹4,000Dec '21Jun '24Nov '26

52-week range ₹2131.00 to ₹5000.00 · 1-year volatility 51.9%

Was the rally earned?

+36%share price, 1 yearEarnings-driven

Mostly yes.

  • Per-share earnings added 26 points to the rise, while the multiple moved less (P/E 77.5x to 84.1x).
  • The share count barely moved.
Net profit growth: +26 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+26 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: +10 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+10 ptsP/E changeShare count change: 0 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.0 ptsShare count changeShare price: +36%+36%Share priceNet profit growth: +26 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+26ProfitP/E change: +10 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+10P/EShare count change: 0 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.0SharesShare price: +36%+36%Share price
Net profit growth+26 ptsNet profit rose about 25%, which lifts the price.
P/E change+10 ptsThe P/E rose from 77.5x to 84.1x, which lifts the price.
Share count change0 ptsShare count was little changed. More shares would count against the price.
+100%share price, 3 yearsLower P/E held it back

Mostly yes, with a catch.

  • Per-share earnings added 111 points, but investors now pay less per rupee of profit (P/E 90.9x to 84.1x), which took 11 points back.
  • The share count barely moved.
Net profit growth: +111 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+111 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: −11 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−11 ptsP/E changeShare price: +100%+100%Share priceNet profit growth: +111 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+111ProfitP/E change: −11 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−11P/EShare price: +100%+100%Share price
Net profit growth+111 ptsNet profit rose about 116%, which lifts the price.
P/E change-11 ptsThe P/E fell from 90.9x to 84.1x, which lowers the price.
Share count change0 ptsShare count was little changed. More shares would count against the price.
What do "pts" mean?

"pts" are percentage points of the share price return. The parts add up to the total shown for each period. Because price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count, higher profit pushes the price up, a higher P/E pushes it up, and more shares push it down.

Example: if the price rose 34% and profit growth accounts for +58 pts while a lower P/E accounts for -24 pts, then 58 - 24 = 34. The +58 is not the profit growth rate itself: it is the part of the price move that profit growth explains.

Not shown for 5 years: earnings were negative at one end, or there is not enough history.

Net profit is trailing twelve months as reported with a 60-day lag.

Compare this with DIXON TECHNOLOGIES INDIA

How rough has the ride been?

Maximum drawdown-58.4%recovered 2026-03
1-year volatility51.9%annualised
Beta vs sector index1.163-year daily, correlation 0.58
Volume spikes2last 90 sessions, 5x the 50-day median

Drawdown from peak

0%−20%−40%−60%2023202420252026−57.7% 0%−20%−40%−60%20242026−57.7%
Largest drawdowns

-58.4% (2024-07 peak to 2025-03 low, recovered 2026-03)

-30.5% (2022-04 peak to 2022-07 low, recovered 2022-08)

-29.4% (2022-11 peak to 2022-12 low, recovered 2023-02)

Most recent volume spikes

2026-11-09: 10x the 50-day median, price +8.7% that day

2026-07-22: 8.1x the 50-day median, price +12.7% that day

Beta is the slope of daily returns against a market-cap-weighted index of the sector's other listed companies, built from today's constituents (so it excludes companies no longer listed).

Is it expensive against its own past and its peers?

84.1xP/E todayWithin its usual range
Against its own history62nd percentile
CheapestMedian 76.4xDearest

Usual range 59.2x to 95.2x since 2021-12.

Against Electronic Technology84.1x vs 55.3x
This company
84.1x
Sector median
55.3x

52% above the Electronic Technology median.

34.6x67.8x100.9x134.1xDec '21Dec '22Dec '23Dec '24Dec '25Nov '2634.6x67.8x100.9x134.1xDec '21Aug '23Apr '25Nov '26
P/E (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianElectronic Technology median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/B (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianElectronic Technology median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/S (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianElectronic Technology median
How to read this

Shaded band: 10th to 90th percentile of the company's own P/E history; dotted line: its median; orange line: sector median (companies with a positive multiple, at least 5 in the sector).

Sector figures are built from today's listed companies, so they exclude companies that are no longer listed.

All terms explained in the glossary →

How Electronic Technology is valued

Where does it rank among Electronic Technology peers?

Each cell is the company's percentile rank among its Electronic Technology peers (non-financial companies) that month.
Darker is better-ranked.
Rows marked ↓ are inverted (lower debt, shorter cash cycle and a lower P/E rank higher).

Where it ranks today

  • ROCE70thflat vs a year ago
  • Op. margin90th▼ 10 pts vs a year ago
  • Revenue growth60th▼ 3 pts vs a year ago
  • EPS growth49thflat vs a year ago
  • Debt/equity ↓87thflat vs a year ago
  • Cash cycle ↓12th▲ 7 pts vs a year ago
  • P/E ↓28th▼ 8 pts vs a year ago
  • 12M momentum71stflat vs a year ago

Rank history

ROCE
Op. margin
Revenue growth
EPS growth
Debt/equity ↓
Cash cycle ↓
P/E ↓
12M momentum
Dec '21Jul '22Jan '23Jul '23Jan '24Jul '24Jan '25Jul '25Jan '26Jul '26Nov '26
Lower rank Higher rank Not enough data

Percentiles use today's listed companies in the sector and need at least 5 peers with a value; grey cells have too few.
ROE is computed from net profit and book value where the source does not report it.

The Electronic Technology sector page Watch it move against Electronic Technology in the Observatory

What is the price implying?

~38%annual earnings growth implied by the priceBelow delivered growth

At normalised P/E (five-year average earnings) of 125.7x, a holder earning 12%/yr needs earnings to grow about 37.7%/yr for 10 years, then trade at 15x.

Delivered78.7%/yrEPS, last 10 fiscal years · 3-yr avg to 3-yr avg
Gap−22.3 ptsimplied minus delivered
Rank788thmost demanding of 856

Over time

Implied growth by month (solid) and delivered growth (dashed).

0%54%108% Jun 2020Nov 2026 0%54%108% Jun 2020Nov 2026

Change the assumptions

Exit P/E / return11%12%13%
12x39.4%40.7%41.9%
15x36.5%37.7%38.9%
20x32.7%33.9%35.1%

Drag a slider to test other assumptions

Implied: 37.7%/yr

Looking back

  • Jan 2022Price implied 45%/yr; EPS has since grown 33%/yr (5.0 yrs)

Past comparisons cover only companies listed today (survivorship bias) and say nothing about future outcomes.

“Implied growth” is what the current price would require under our stated assumptions, not what we expect. How this is calculated and the market-wide lists.

What prices imply across Electronic Technology The market-wide Expectations lists

Key figures

Share Priceclose 9 Nov
₹4025.00
P/E
84.1x
ROCE
22.0%
Market Cap
₹22534 cr
Revenue (TTM)
₹941 cr
P/S
23.9x
P/B
13.0x
ROE
15.4%
Operating Margin
27.0%
Debt / Equity
0.0x
Promoter Holding
42.4%
12M Momentum
35.5%

52-week range

₹2131.00₹5000.00
66% of the way from its 52-week low to its high

Price risk

1Y volatility
51.9%
Beta vs sector
1-year daily
1.43

Balance sheet & cash

Interest cover
operating profit ÷ interest
30.9x
Cash from profit, 3Y
operating cash flow ÷ net profit
0.19x
low
Share count, 1Y
unchanged

Are profits backed by cash?

5 of 7checks within range1 beyond a threshold
Other income reliance6%Within range

Other income as a share of pre-tax profit (trailing twelve months): 6.2%. Bands: below 15%, 15% to 35%, above 35%.

Tax rate25%Within range

Median quarterly effective tax rate over about 2.5 years: 25.0%. Bands: 15% to 35%, 5% to 15% or 35% to 50%, outside 5% to 50%.

Cash conversion0.19xBeyond threshold

Operating cash flow divided by net profit over the last three fiscal years: 0.19x (cash from operations ₹129 cr, net profit ₹675 cr). Bands: 0.8x and above, 0.5x to 0.8x, below 0.5x.

Free cash flow3 of 5 yrsNear threshold

Fiscal years with positive free cash flow in the last 5: 3. Bands: at least 80% of years, 40% to 80%, below 40%.

Receivable days vs history-20 daysWithin range

Debtor days are below the median of the previous three fiscal years by 20 days (287 vs 307). Bands: under 15 days, 15 to 45, over 45.

Capital work in progress28% of fixed assetsWithin range

Capital work-in-progress is 28% of fixed assets. Bands: not rising or up to 30%; rising for three years and above 30%; rising and above 60%.

Payable days-29 days / 2 yrsWithin range

Days payable changed by -29 over two years. Bands: rise of up to 30 days; more than 30 days.

Tap a check to see how it is measured

How to read this

Each check is a named rule with fixed thresholds, not a score. Annual statements are the latest restated figures, so a past year may differ from what was originally reported.

All terms explained in the glossary →

Who has been buying and selling?

  • Over 3 years, FIIs added 5.3 pts; DIIs added 2.4 pts.
  • The number of shareholders rose from 1.2 lakh to 2.1 lakh (+79%) between Sep 2023 and Jun 2026.

Holdings, Jun '26

How each group changed

GroupSep '23Jun '26Change
Promoters42.4%42.4%0.0 pts
FIIs7.2%12.5%+5.3 pts
DIIs9.6%12.0%+2.4 pts
Public and others40.9%33.1%-7.8 pts

Number of shareholders

2.1 lakhshareholders+79% since Sep '23
1.2L1.6L1.9L2.3L Sep '23Jun '24Mar '25Dec '25Jun '26
Sep '23: 1.2 lakh
Dec '23: 1.3 lakh
Mar '24: 1.4 lakh
Jun '24: 1.8 lakh
Sep '24: 1.9 lakh
Dec '24: 2.0 lakh
Mar '25: 2.2 lakh
Jun '25: 2.3 lakh
Sep '25: 2.2 lakh
Dec '25: 2.1 lakh
Mar '26: 2.0 lakh
Jun '26: 2.1 lakh
1.2L1.6L1.9L2.3L Sep '23Sep '24Sep '25Jun '26
Sep '23: 1.2 lakh
Dec '23: 1.3 lakh
Mar '24: 1.4 lakh
Jun '24: 1.8 lakh
Sep '24: 1.9 lakh
Dec '24: 2.0 lakh
Mar '25: 2.2 lakh
Jun '25: 2.3 lakh
Sep '25: 2.2 lakh
Dec '25: 2.1 lakh
Mar '26: 2.0 lakh
Jun '26: 2.1 lakh

Quarterly shareholding as reported, labelled by the quarter it covers (it becomes visible about two months later).
Shareholder counts are only available for recent quarters.

This quarter's smart-money board

What happened next to similar setups

−3.2%typical 12-month return vs the marketNot meaningfully different from the base rate
  • We found 50 past situations where a non-financial company looked like DATA PATTERNS INDIA LIMITED today on valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, price momentum, size and volatility.
  • Over the following 12 months the middle half of them returned −25% to +19% vs the market, against −7% for all non-financial companies in the same months.
  • The gap against the base rate (+3.6%, 80% range −5.4% to +6.7%) is within what chance and overlapping periods produce.

Where the 50 outcomes landed

−100%−50%0%+50%+100%
NEWGEN · May 2025: −65.0% vs market
COHANCE · May 2025: −59.7% vs market
AURIONPRO · Mar 2025: −53.6% vs market
POLYMED · Feb 2025: −47.7% vs market
FINEORG · Nov 2022: −40.8% vs market
SAREGAMA · Feb 2025: −36.4% vs market
JYOTICNC · Apr 2025: −34.7% vs market
KIOCL · Jun 2021: −32.7% vs market
ITDC · Feb 2024: −32.1% vs market
KPITTECH · Nov 2023: −29.4% vs market
COCHINSHIP · Sep 2025: −26.9% vs market
AFFLE · Oct 2025: −26.5% vs market
MAPMYINDIA · Jun 2024: −25.1% vs market
ADVENZYMES · Oct 2020: −24.6% vs market
SONACOMS · Jun 2022: −22.4% vs market
LINDEINDIA · May 2024: −18.0% vs market
BDL · Aug 2025: −17.5% vs market
ACE · May 2024: −17.0% vs market
AVANTEL · Oct 2025: −17.0% vs market
SUZLON · Oct 2024: −13.7% vs market
AZAD · Jan 2025: −10.3% vs market
HONAUT · May 2020: −8.9% vs market
NETWEB · Jul 2024: −6.6% vs market
MTARTECH · Mar 2022: −5.0% vs market
ASTRAL · Aug 2021: −4.3% vs market
ASTRAZEN · Feb 2020: −2.1% vs market
LAOPALA · Oct 2022: −1.1% vs market
FCL · Nov 2022: −1.1% vs market
EMUDHRA · Apr 2024: +0.6% vs market
TRITURBINE · Jul 2023: +0.8% vs market
HINDCOPPER · Sep 2024: +3.8% vs market
SHANTIGEAR · Apr 2023: +6.5% vs market
KFINTECH · Aug 2024: +6.6% vs market
GRINDWELL · Nov 2021: +8.9% vs market
INGERRAND · May 2023: +10.5% vs market
NEULANDLAB · Apr 2025: +17.3% vs market
BLS · May 2023: +18.5% vs market
NAVINFLUOR · Dec 2020: +18.8% vs market
THYROCARE · Sep 2025: +37.3% vs market
CDSL · Apr 2021: +38.2% vs market
COFORGE · Oct 2020: +38.3% vs market
KRN · Oct 2025: +54.0% vs market
POWERINDIA · Oct 2025: +61.8% vs market
MCX · May 2024: +73.0% vs market
BSE · Sep 2024: +80.0% vs market
PARAS · Oct 2025: +86.3% vs market
ZENTEC · May 2024: +110.9% vs market
AEROFLEX · Jun 2025: +121.2% vs market
ACUTAAS · Sep 2025: +147.5% vs market
RPEL · Sep 2025: +179.8% vs market
Similar setups −3.2%All companies −6.8%← worse than the marketbetter than the market →

Each dot is one past situation (hover or tap for details) · Solid dots are the closest matches, listed below · Shaded is the middle half of all companies in the same months · 4 beyond the range shown, drawn at the edge

Similar setups' median
−3.2%
All companies' median
−6.8%
Beat the market
44% vs 42%

50 past situations · 50 companies · 33 months · 2020–2025

The closest matches

CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
TRITURBINE
Producer Manufacturing
Jul 2023 66x29% +134%−6% +1%
ITDC
Consumer Services
Feb 2024 110x28% +139%−10% −32%
EMUDHRA
Technology Services
Apr 2024 96x24% +180%−7% +1%
LINDEINDIA
Process Industries
May 2024 138x21% +120%−10% −18%
RPEL
Process Industries
Sep 2025 73x26% +20%−24% +180%
Show the other 3 matches
CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
SONACOMS
Producer Manufacturing
Jun 2022 90x22% +62%−33% −22%
BDL
Electronic Technology
Aug 2025 96x20% +10%−29% −18%
PARAS
Electronic Technology
Oct 2025 89x16% +36%−24% +86%
How reliable is this?

Matched on P/E, P/S, ROCE, operating margin, debt/equity, interest cover, revenue growth, 12-month momentum, drawdown from 12-month high, size and volatility. Closest on: 12-month momentum, drawdown from 12-month high and ROCE. One match per company and at most 7 from any one month.

Independent periods: the matches fall in 6 distinct 12-month windows. Matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, so fewer windows means less evidence.

How this is built

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to DATA PATTERNS INDIA LIMITED. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

Methodology

How historical analogs are built

Data as of 2026-11-09. Outcome pool: Jan 2020 to Oct 2025.

For every company we look at the situation it is in today (valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, 12-month price momentum, drawdown, size and volatility) and find past company-months that looked most like it. We then show what happened to those past situations over the following 12 months, measured against the ApnaFunda All index and against the base rate. It describes history. It does not predict anything.

What is compared

FeatureWeightNon-financialFinancial
P/E1yesyes
P/S1yes—
P/B1—yes
ROCE1yes—
operating margin1yes—
ROE1—yes
debt/equity0.75yes—
interest cover0.5yes—
revenue growth0.75yesyes
12-month momentum1yesyes
drawdown from 12-month high0.75yesyes
size0.75yesyes
volatility0.5yesyes

Weights were set by judgement before any outcome was looked at and are never tuned on results. Loss-making companies (negative P/E or net profit) are only matched with other loss-making companies. Banks, NBFCs and insurers are compared only with each other and use a different feature set. Every feature is converted, month by month, to its rank among companies in the same pool in that month, so a P/E of 30 in a hot market and a P/E of 22 in a cold one can match if both were equally expensive for their time. Only that month's data is used.

How closeness and the sample are defined

Distance is the weighted root-mean-square gap between the standardised features both companies have. A match needs at least 70% of the query's feature weight, a distance of at most 0.9, and 30 matches at minimum to be shown. We keep up to 50 matches with these exclusions: never the company itself, one match per company (its closest month), and at most 7 from any one calendar month so a single market episode cannot dominate.

Base rate

The base rate is the distribution of 12-month returns, relative to the market, of every eligible company-month in the same pool, with each month weighted to match the months the analogs came from. It answers: how did a random company do in these same months? Because matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, we also report the number of distinct 12-month windows behind a result, and a bootstrap that resamples months decides whether the analog median differs from the base rate at all. "Not meaningfully different" is the usual outcome and the page copy is written for it.

Limits you should know

  • One market period. The outcome pool covers 2020–2025 only (70 months), including the 2020 crash and the 2020–21 rally.
  • Survivorship. Only companies listed today are included. Delisted and bankrupt companies are missing, which flatters past outcomes, particularly for distressed-looking setups.
  • Price return only. Dividends are excluded, and the benchmark is an ApnaFunda market-cap-weighted index of the same listed companies, not an official index.
  • Reporting lag. Fundamentals are matched on an assumed 60-day lag after the quarter end, not on real announcement dates.
  • Pools: non-financial: 98,395 company-months from 2019 companies; financial: 5,659 company-months from 108 companies. 2349 companies currently have a result; the rest are suppressed because too few comparable situations exist.

Does it work? A walk-forward check

The walk-forward check has not been run for this build, so skill is shown as not yet measured.

Disclaimer

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to any company shown. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

What else looks like this?

Companies with the most similar financial profile today, regardless of industry.

Process Industries
76%similar
P/Emarket cap
Producer Manufacturing
70%similar
market caprevenue growth
CUPIDCUPID
Consumer Non-Durables
64%similar
promoter holdingmarket cap
Health Technology
61%similar
operating marginrevenue
Process Industries
60%similar
promoter holdingP/E
Electronic Technology
73%similar
volatilityoperating margin
Electronic Technology
47%similar
revenueP/E
Electronic Technology
46%similar
P/EEPS growth

Similarity is statistical, based on reported metrics; it does not imply similar business quality or future returns.

What changed?

30 events since Feb '24

  1. NovPriceVolume reached 10.0x its 50-day median on 2026-11-09; price +8.7% that day.
  2. SepPeer rankSlipped to the 3rd quartile of Electronic Technology on EPS growth (from the 2nd quartile).
  3. JulPriceVolume reached 8.1x its 50-day median on 2026-07-22; price +12.7% that day.
  4. AprPriceVolume reached 7.0x its 50-day median on 2026-04-23; price +8.0% that day.
  5. MarPriceRegained the 2024-07 peak, 12 months after the low.
  6. FebPriceVolume reached 10.0x its 50-day median on 2026-02-06; price +7.9% that day.
  7. DecResultsRevenue (TTM) reached a new high of ₹919 cr.
  8. DecPeer rankMoved into the 2nd quartile of Electronic Technology on EPS growth (from the 3rd quartile).
Show 22 earlier events
  1. NovPriceVolume reached 32.1x its 50-day median on 2025-11-13; price +7.6% that day.
  2. SepPeer rankSlipped to the 3rd quartile of Electronic Technology on EPS growth (from the 2nd quartile).
  3. SepPriceVolume reached 5.3x its 50-day median on 2025-09-17; price +3.9% that day.
  4. JunResultsRevenue (TTM) reached a new high of ₹708 cr.
  5. JunInstitutionsFII + DII holding fell 3.0 pts over 2 quarters to 20.1%.
  6. AprPriceVolume reached 12.7x its 50-day median on 2025-04-15; price +11.7% that day.
  7. MarPriceFell 58% from the Jul 2024 peak to the Mar 2025 low.
  8. MarPriceVolume reached 70.6x its 50-day median on 2025-03-07; price +14.6% that day.
  9. FebValuationP/E fell below the 10th percentile of its own history to date (43.5x).
  10. OctPriceVolume reached 17.4x its 50-day median on 2024-10-30; price +12.5% that day.
  11. SepPeer rankSlipped to the 2nd quartile of Electronic Technology on EPS growth (from the top quartile).
  12. JulPriceRegained the 2024-05 peak, 1 month after the low.
  13. JulPriceVolume reached 12.3x its 50-day median on 2024-07-05; price +6.6% that day.
  14. JunResultsRevenue (TTM) reached a new high of ₹520 cr.
  15. JunInstitutionsFII + DII holding rose 10.2 pts over 1 quarter to 26.1%.
  16. JunPriceFell 25% from the May 2024 peak to the Jun 2024 low.
  17. JunPeer rankMoved into the top quartile of Electronic Technology on EPS growth (from the 3rd quartile).
  18. AprPriceVolume reached 9.8x its 50-day median on 2024-04-10; price +11.9% that day.
  19. FebPriceRegained the 2023-09 peak, 0 months after the low.
  20. FebPriceFell 28% from the Sep 2023 peak to the Feb 2024 low.
  21. FebValuationP/E crossed above the 90th percentile of its own history to date (112.2x).
  22. FebPriceVolume reached 20.6x its 50-day median on 2024-02-23; price +5.5% that day.

Events are generated from the data by fixed rules.
The month shown is when the change became visible in the reported figures, assuming a 60-day lag after each quarter end; it is not an announcement date.

Where price and fundamentals disagree, market-wide Rewind the whole market to any month

Monthly history60 months · 2021-12 to 2026-11
MonthP/ERevenue (TTM)ROEROCEDebt / Equity
2026-1184.1x₹941 cr15.4%22.0%0.0x
2026-1079.4x₹941 cr15.4%22.0%0.0x
2026-0989.6x₹941 cr15.4%22.0%0.0x
2026-0893.3x₹924 cr15.6%22.0%0.0x
2026-0788.3x₹924 cr15.6%22.0%0.0x
2026-0692.9x₹924 cr15.6%22.0%0.0x
2026-0591.6x₹975 cr16.4%21.0%0.0x
2026-0492.5x₹975 cr16.4%21.0%0.0x
2026-0368.8x₹975 cr16.4%21.0%0.0x
2026-0277.0x₹919 cr15.5%21.0%0.0x
2026-0164.1x₹919 cr15.5%21.0%0.0x
2025-1263.0x₹919 cr15.5%21.0%0.0x
2025-1177.5x₹703 cr14.3%21.0%0.0x
2025-1071.6x₹703 cr14.3%21.0%0.0x
2025-0966.5x₹703 cr14.3%21.0%0.0x
2025-0860.6x₹708 cr14.7%21.0%0.0x
2025-0766.6x₹708 cr14.7%21.0%0.0x
2025-0673.2x₹708 cr14.7%21.0%0.0x
2025-0589.1x₹494 cr13.5%20.0%0.0x
2025-0477.8x₹494 cr13.5%20.0%0.0x
2025-0352.9x₹494 cr13.5%20.0%0.0x
2025-0243.5x₹517 cr14.0%20.0%0.0x
2025-0166.7x₹517 cr14.0%20.0%0.0x
2024-1274.7x₹517 cr14.0%20.0%0.0x
2024-1174.3x₹534 cr14.3%20.0%0.0x
2024-1071.8x₹534 cr14.3%20.0%0.0x
2024-0968.7x₹534 cr14.3%20.0%0.0x
2024-0886.4x₹520 cr13.7%20.0%0.0x
2024-0798.3x₹520 cr13.7%20.0%0.0x
2024-0692.5x₹520 cr13.7%20.0%0.0x
2024-05133.7x₹453 cr10.6%20.0%0.0x
2024-04134.1x₹453 cr10.6%20.0%0.0x
2024-03109.3x₹453 cr10.6%20.0%0.0x
2024-02112.2x₹453 cr10.6%20.0%0.0x
2024-0186.0x₹453 cr10.6%20.0%0.0x
2023-1284.0x₹453 cr10.6%20.0%0.0x
2023-1190.9x₹453 cr10.6%20.0%0.0x
2023-1084.3x₹453 cr10.6%20.0%0.0x
2023-0994.9x₹453 cr10.6%20.0%0.0x
2023-08107.1x₹453 cr10.6%20.0%0.0x
2023-0792.0x₹453 cr10.6%20.0%0.0x
2023-0684.3x₹453 cr10.6%20.0%0.0x
2023-0593.3x₹311 cr16.4%33.0%0.0x
2023-0491.8x₹311 cr16.4%33.0%0.0x
2023-0376.0x₹311 cr16.4%33.0%0.0x
2023-0272.1x₹311 cr16.4%33.0%0.0x
2023-0176.9x₹311 cr16.4%33.0%0.0x
2022-1260.5x₹311 cr16.4%33.0%0.0x
2022-1174.3x₹311 cr16.4%33.0%0.0x
2022-1073.7x₹311 cr16.4%33.0%0.0x
2022-0962.4x₹311 cr16.4%33.0%0.0x
2022-0858.9x₹311 cr16.4%33.0%0.0x
2022-0742.9x₹311 cr16.4%33.0%0.0x
2022-0635.4x₹311 cr16.4%33.0%0.0x
2022-0564.4x₹224 cr26.9%39.0%0.2x
2022-0467.2x₹224 cr26.9%39.0%0.2x
2022-0359.2x₹224 cr26.9%39.0%0.2x
2022-0251.7x₹224 cr26.9%39.0%0.2x
2022-0160.8x₹224 cr26.9%39.0%0.2x
2021-1264.0x₹224 cr26.9%39.0%0.2x

Methodology and data notes

Methodology

Methodology and data notes

All figures come from public exchange prices and screener.in financial statements. Quarterly and annual results are shown from 60 days after the period end, so a month never uses a result before it would plausibly have been published. Statements are the latest versions, which may include later restatements.

Sector medians, percentiles and indices use today's listed companies in the sector (survivorship bias). Prices are adjusted for splits and bonus issues; around a corporate action the fundamentals may lag the price by up to a month, and affected sections are hidden.

The return decomposition uses price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count. The reverse DCF uses a fixed 12% cost of equity, a 10-year horizon and a 15x terminal P/E, and is an illustration only. Events, flags and twins follow fixed rules and thresholds described next to each section.

Feedback