अApnaFunda

RAGHAV PRODUCTIVITY ENHAN LTD (RPEL)

Process Industries · Chemicals: Major Diversified · figures to Nov '26

Quality scoreHow the business itself ranks against its sector peers on profitability, 3-year growth and leverage. 50 is the middle of the sector.98 / 100
Profitability 95Balance sheet 100
Momentum scoreHow strong the recent trend is: 3-month price change, 12-month improvement in earnings and the rise in FII + DII holding, among companies above ₹500 cr.84 / 100
Price 98Earnings 81FII/DII 74

Passes these screensQuality CompounderHigh MomentumDebt-light & profitableNear 52-week high

Share price

Closing priceAdjusted for splits and bonus issues.

₹1,919.6 latest close · +52.2% over the last 90 sessions

₹1,250₹1,500₹1,750Jul 3Jul 29Aug 24Sep 17Oct 14Nov 9 ₹1,250₹1,500₹1,750Jul 3Sep 4Nov 9

₹1,919.6 month-end · +90.2% over 12 months

₹500₹1,000₹1,500₹2,000Nov '25Jan '26Apr '26Jun '26Sep '26Nov '26 ₹500₹1,000₹1,500₹2,000Nov '25May '26Nov '26

₹1,919.6 month-end · +214.6% since Aug '24

₹500₹1,000₹1,500₹2,000Aug '24Jan '25Jul '25Dec '25Jun '26Nov '26 ₹500₹1,000₹1,500₹2,000Aug '24Oct '25Nov '26

52-week range ₹561.30 to ₹1943.70 · 1-year volatility 51.9%

Was the rally earned?

+90%share price, 1 yearEarnings-driven

Mostly yes.

  • Per-share earnings added 62 points to the rise, while the multiple moved less (P/E 114.7x to 140.6x).
  • The share count barely moved.
Net profit growth: +60 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+60 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: +29 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+29 ptsP/E changeShare count change: +2 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.+2 ptsShare count changeShare price: +90%+90%Share priceNet profit growth: +60 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+60ProfitP/E change: +29 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+29P/EShare count change: +2 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.+2SharesShare price: +90%+90%Share price
Net profit growth+60 ptsNet profit rose about 53%, which lifts the price.
P/E change+29 ptsThe P/E rose from 114.7x to 140.6x, which lifts the price.
Share count change+2 ptsShare count was little changed. More shares would count against the price.
What do "pts" mean?

"pts" are percentage points of the share price return. The parts add up to the total shown for each period. Because price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count, higher profit pushes the price up, a higher P/E pushes it up, and more shares push it down.

Example: if the price rose 34% and profit growth accounts for +58 pts while a lower P/E accounts for -24 pts, then 58 - 24 = 34. The +58 is not the profit growth rate itself: it is the part of the price move that profit growth explains.

Not shown for 3 years and 5 years: earnings were negative at one end, or there is not enough history.

Net profit is trailing twelve months as reported with a 60-day lag.

Compare this with AETHER INDUSTRIES

How rough has the ride been?

Maximum drawdown-46.3%recovered 2026-06
1-year volatility51.9%annualised
Beta vs sector index1.493-year daily, correlation 0.49
Volume spikes1last 90 sessions, 5x the 50-day median

Drawdown from peak

0%−20%−40%20252026−45.0% 0%−20%−40%20252026−45.0%
Largest drawdowns

-46.3% (2025-11 peak to 2026-03 low, recovered 2026-06)

-45.4% (2024-11 peak to 2025-03 low, recovered 2025-11)

-17.9% (2026-09 peak to 2026-09 low, recovered 2026-11)

Most recent volume spikes

2026-08-19: 5.8x the 50-day median, price +9.5% that day

Beta is the slope of daily returns against a market-cap-weighted index of the sector's other listed companies, built from today's constituents (so it excludes companies no longer listed).

Is it expensive against its own past and its peers?

140.6xP/E todayNear its historic high
Against its own history96th percentile
CheapestMedian 88.9xDearest

Usual range 70.2x to 125.2x since 2024-08.

Against Process Industries140.6x vs 18.1x
This company
140.6x
Sector median
18.1x

678% above the Process Industries median.

16.0x60.2x104.3x148.5xAug '24Feb '25Aug '25Feb '26Aug '26Nov '2616.0x60.2x104.3x148.5xAug '24May '25Feb '26Nov '26
P/E (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianProcess Industries median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/B (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianProcess Industries median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/S (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianProcess Industries median
How to read this

Shaded band: 10th to 90th percentile of the company's own P/E history; dotted line: its median; orange line: sector median (companies with a positive multiple, at least 5 in the sector).

Sector figures are built from today's listed companies, so they exclude companies that are no longer listed.

All terms explained in the glossary →

How Process Industries is valued

Where does it rank among Process Industries peers?

Each cell is the company's percentile rank among its Process Industries peers (non-financial companies) that month.
Darker is better-ranked.
Rows marked ↓ are inverted (lower debt, shorter cash cycle and a lower P/E rank higher).

Where it ranks today

  • ROCE95th▲ 4 pts vs a year ago
  • Op. margin96thflat vs a year ago
  • Revenue growth89th▼ 3 pts vs a year ago
  • EPS growth78thflat vs a year ago
  • Debt/equity ↓88th▲ 3 pts vs a year ago
  • Cash cycle ↓13th▼ 6 pts vs a year ago
  • P/E ↓3rdflat vs a year ago
  • 12M momentum95th▲ 4 pts vs a year ago

Rank history

ROCE
Op. margin
Revenue growth
EPS growth
Debt/equity ↓
Cash cycle ↓
P/E ↓
12M momentum
Dec '21Jul '22Jan '23Jul '23Jan '24Jul '24Jan '25Jul '25Jan '26Jul '26Nov '26
Lower rank Higher rank Not enough data

Percentiles use today's listed companies in the sector and need at least 5 peers with a value; grey cells have too few.
ROE is computed from net profit and book value where the source does not report it.

The Process Industries sector page Watch it move against Process Industries in the Observatory

What is the price implying?

~50%annual earnings growth implied by the priceAbove delivered growth

At normalised P/E (five-year average earnings) of 275.1x, a holder earning 12%/yr needs earnings to grow about 49.5%/yr for 10 years, then trade at 15x.

Delivered30.0%/yrEPS, last 6 fiscal years · 3-yr avg to 3-yr avg
Gap+19.5 ptsimplied minus delivered
Rank153rdmost demanding of 856

Over time

Implied growth by month (solid) and delivered growth (dashed).

0%25%50% Aug 2024Nov 2026 0%25%50% Aug 2024Nov 2026

Change the assumptions

Exit P/E / return11%12%13%
12x51.5%52.8%54.2%
15x48.2%49.5%50.9%
20x44.0%45.3%46.6%

Drag a slider to test other assumptions

Implied: 49.5%/yr

“Implied growth” is what the current price would require under our stated assumptions, not what we expect. How this is calculated and the market-wide lists.

What prices imply across Process Industries The market-wide Expectations lists

Key figures

Share Priceclose 9 Nov
₹1919.60
P/E
140.6x
ROCE
30.0%
Market Cap
₹8817 cr
Revenue (TTM)
₹286 cr
P/S
30.8x
P/B
36.0x
ROE
25.6%
Operating Margin
30.0%
Debt / Equity
0.0x
Promoter Holding
62.9%
12M Momentum
90.2%

52-week range

₹561.30₹1943.70
98% of the way from its 52-week low to its high

Price risk

1Y volatility
51.9%
Beta vs sector
1-year daily
1.62

Balance sheet & cash

Debt service
no meaningful debt
Cash from profit, 3Y
operating cash flow ÷ net profit
0.82x
Share count, 1Y
unchanged

Are profits backed by cash?

6 of 7checks within range1 near a threshold
Other income reliance4%Within range

Other income as a share of pre-tax profit (trailing twelve months): 3.8%. Bands: below 15%, 15% to 35%, above 35%.

Tax rate22%Within range

Median quarterly effective tax rate over about 2.5 years: 22.0%. Bands: 15% to 35%, 5% to 15% or 35% to 50%, outside 5% to 50%.

Cash conversion0.82xWithin range

Operating cash flow divided by net profit over the last three fiscal years: 0.82x (cash from operations ₹97 cr, net profit ₹118 cr). Bands: 0.8x and above, 0.5x to 0.8x, below 0.5x.

Free cash flow3 of 5 yrsNear threshold

Fiscal years with positive free cash flow in the last 5: 3. Bands: at least 80% of years, 40% to 80%, below 40%.

Receivable days vs history-19 daysWithin range

Debtor days are below the median of the previous three fiscal years by 19 days (83 vs 102). Bands: under 15 days, 15 to 45, over 45.

Capital work in progress4% of fixed assetsWithin range

Capital work-in-progress is 4% of fixed assets. Bands: not rising or up to 30%; rising for three years and above 30%; rising and above 60%.

Payable days-21 days / 2 yrsWithin range

Days payable changed by -21 over two years. Bands: rise of up to 30 days; more than 30 days.

Tap a check to see how it is measured

How to read this

Each check is a named rule with fixed thresholds, not a score. Annual statements are the latest restated figures, so a past year may differ from what was originally reported.

All terms explained in the glossary →

Who has been buying and selling?

  • Over 2 years, FIIs added 0.8 pts.
  • The number of shareholders rose from 9,801 to 14,899 (+52%) between Mar 2024 and Jun 2026.

Holdings, Jun '26

How each group changed

GroupMar '24Jun '26Change
Promoters62.9%62.9%0.0 pts
FIIs0.0%0.8%+0.8 pts
DIIs0.0%0.0%0.0 pts
Public and others37.1%36.3%-0.8 pts

Number of shareholders

14,899shareholders+52% since Mar '24
9k11k13k15k Mar '24Sep '24Mar '25Sep '25Mar '26Jun '26
Mar '24: 9,801
Jun '24: 8,724
Sep '24: 9,868
Dec '24: 14,675
Mar '25: 14,977
Jun '25: 14,151
Sep '25: 14,315
Dec '25: 13,312
Mar '26: 12,868
Jun '26: 14,899
9k11k13k15k Mar '24Dec '24Sep '25Jun '26
Mar '24: 9,801
Jun '24: 8,724
Sep '24: 9,868
Dec '24: 14,675
Mar '25: 14,977
Jun '25: 14,151
Sep '25: 14,315
Dec '25: 13,312
Mar '26: 12,868
Jun '26: 14,899

Quarterly shareholding as reported, labelled by the quarter it covers (it becomes visible about two months later).
Shareholder counts are only available for recent quarters.

This quarter's smart-money board

What happened next to similar setups

−0.7%typical 12-month return vs the marketNot meaningfully different from the base rate
  • We found 50 past situations where a non-financial company looked like RAGHAV PRODUCTIVITY ENHAN LTD today on valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, price momentum, size and volatility.
  • Over the following 12 months the middle half of them returned −24% to +25% vs the market, against −5% for all non-financial companies in the same months.
  • The gap against the base rate (+3.8%, 80% range −4.9% to +10.1%) is within what chance and overlapping periods produce.

Where the 50 outcomes landed

−100%−50%0%+50%+100%
COHANCE · Feb 2025: −78.4% vs market
NEWGEN · Dec 2024: −53.0% vs market
TAC · Oct 2025: −51.7% vs market
VAIBHAVGBL · Feb 2021: −51.3% vs market
POLYMED · Apr 2025: −44.9% vs market
FINEORG · Sep 2022: −40.8% vs market
THYROCARE · Oct 2020: −37.9% vs market
JWL · May 2024: −37.6% vs market
ANUP · Oct 2024: −35.4% vs market
KFINTECH · Dec 2024: −33.3% vs market
ADVENZYMES · Sep 2020: −28.1% vs market
GMMPFAUDLR · May 2020: −27.7% vs market
RHIM · Dec 2022: −24.5% vs market
ALKYLAMINE · Apr 2021: −24.2% vs market
BALAMINES · Aug 2021: −20.0% vs market
ASTRAZEN · Apr 2020: −19.4% vs market
DOMS · Mar 2025: −17.9% vs market
ACE · Mar 2024: −15.0% vs market
NETWEB · Aug 2024: −12.0% vs market
AZAD · Dec 2024: −9.1% vs market
SUZLON · Jul 2024: −5.7% vs market
INGERRAND · Mar 2023: −5.4% vs market
TASTYBITE · Feb 2020: −4.6% vs market
DATAPATTNS · Jan 2023: −1.6% vs market
PIIND · Apr 2020: −1.1% vs market
NEULANDLAB · Nov 2024: −0.4% vs market
HONAUT · Mar 2020: +2.0% vs market
FCL · Aug 2022: +3.8% vs market
SHANTIGEAR · Oct 2022: +6.5% vs market
LALPATHLAB · Jan 2020: +6.6% vs market
TRITURBINE · Sep 2023: +7.6% vs market
EMUDHRA · Mar 2024: +8.7% vs market
JUBLFOOD · Jan 2020: +15.1% vs market
CDSL · May 2021: +17.6% vs market
TIPSMUSIC · Feb 2024: +18.9% vs market
AFFLE · Nov 2020: +19.1% vs market
BLS · Nov 2022: +24.2% vs market
ZENTEC · Apr 2024: +25.5% vs market
JSLL · Mar 2025: +27.1% vs market
ASTRAL · Mar 2020: +27.7% vs market
INDIAMART · Aug 2020: +33.7% vs market
SHAILY · Aug 2025: +36.1% vs market
NPST · Apr 2024: +45.7% vs market
KAYNES · Feb 2024: +46.2% vs market
MCX · Jun 2025: +58.3% vs market
POWERINDIA · Jun 2025: +74.2% vs market
TDPOWERSYS · Oct 2025: +94.7% vs market
ACUTAAS · Aug 2025: +108.7% vs market
AIMTRON · Oct 2025: +111.8% vs market
ATGL · Jan 2021: +251.3% vs market
Similar setups −0.7%All companies −4.5%← worse than the marketbetter than the market →

Each dot is one past situation (hover or tap for details) · Solid dots are the closest matches, listed below · Shaded is the middle half of all companies in the same months · 3 beyond the range shown, drawn at the edge

Similar setups' median
−0.7%
All companies' median
−4.5%
Beat the market
48% vs 45%

50 past situations · 50 companies · 37 months · 2020–2025

The closest matches

CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
DATAPATTNS
Electronic Technology
Jan 2023 77x33% +93%−3% −2%
ASTRAZEN
Health Technology
Apr 2020 139x27% +29%0% −19%
NETWEB
Electronic Technology
Aug 2024 202x38% +222%0% −12%
GMMPFAUDLR
Producer Manufacturing
May 2020 110x29% +201%−2% −28%
KFINTECH
Technology Services
Dec 2024 88x30% +219%−4% −33%
Show the other 3 matches
CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
NEWGEN
Technology Services
Dec 2024 82x27% +118%0% −53%
ACUTAAS
Process Industries
Aug 2025 73x20% +104%−2% +109%
LALPATHLAB
Health Services
Jan 2020 74x35% +64%0% +7%
How reliable is this?

Matched on P/E, P/S, ROCE, operating margin, debt/equity, revenue growth, 12-month momentum, drawdown from 12-month high, size and volatility. Closest on: 12-month momentum, size and revenue growth. Not used (unavailable for this company): interest cover. One match per company and at most 7 from any one month.

Independent periods: the matches fall in 6 distinct 12-month windows. Matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, so fewer windows means less evidence.

How this is built

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to RAGHAV PRODUCTIVITY ENHAN LTD. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

Methodology

How historical analogs are built

Data as of 2026-11-09. Outcome pool: Jan 2020 to Oct 2025.

For every company we look at the situation it is in today (valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, 12-month price momentum, drawdown, size and volatility) and find past company-months that looked most like it. We then show what happened to those past situations over the following 12 months, measured against the ApnaFunda All index and against the base rate. It describes history. It does not predict anything.

What is compared

FeatureWeightNon-financialFinancial
P/E1yesyes
P/S1yes—
P/B1—yes
ROCE1yes—
operating margin1yes—
ROE1—yes
debt/equity0.75yes—
interest cover0.5yes—
revenue growth0.75yesyes
12-month momentum1yesyes
drawdown from 12-month high0.75yesyes
size0.75yesyes
volatility0.5yesyes

Weights were set by judgement before any outcome was looked at and are never tuned on results. Loss-making companies (negative P/E or net profit) are only matched with other loss-making companies. Banks, NBFCs and insurers are compared only with each other and use a different feature set. Every feature is converted, month by month, to its rank among companies in the same pool in that month, so a P/E of 30 in a hot market and a P/E of 22 in a cold one can match if both were equally expensive for their time. Only that month's data is used.

How closeness and the sample are defined

Distance is the weighted root-mean-square gap between the standardised features both companies have. A match needs at least 70% of the query's feature weight, a distance of at most 0.9, and 30 matches at minimum to be shown. We keep up to 50 matches with these exclusions: never the company itself, one match per company (its closest month), and at most 7 from any one calendar month so a single market episode cannot dominate.

Base rate

The base rate is the distribution of 12-month returns, relative to the market, of every eligible company-month in the same pool, with each month weighted to match the months the analogs came from. It answers: how did a random company do in these same months? Because matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, we also report the number of distinct 12-month windows behind a result, and a bootstrap that resamples months decides whether the analog median differs from the base rate at all. "Not meaningfully different" is the usual outcome and the page copy is written for it.

Limits you should know

  • One market period. The outcome pool covers 2020–2025 only (70 months), including the 2020 crash and the 2020–21 rally.
  • Survivorship. Only companies listed today are included. Delisted and bankrupt companies are missing, which flatters past outcomes, particularly for distressed-looking setups.
  • Price return only. Dividends are excluded, and the benchmark is an ApnaFunda market-cap-weighted index of the same listed companies, not an official index.
  • Reporting lag. Fundamentals are matched on an assumed 60-day lag after the quarter end, not on real announcement dates.
  • Pools: non-financial: 98,395 company-months from 2019 companies; financial: 5,659 company-months from 108 companies. 2349 companies currently have a result; the rest are suppressed because too few comparable situations exist.

Does it work? A walk-forward check

The walk-forward check has not been run for this build, so skill is shown as not yet measured.

Disclaimer

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to any company shown. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

What else looks like this?

Companies with the most similar financial profile today, regardless of industry.

Producer Manufacturing
68%similar
debt/equityP/E
Technology Services
67%similar
revenuedebt/equity
Electronic Technology
61%similar
volatilityP/E
Electronic Technology
52%similar
ROCErevenue
TIPS MUSICTIPSMUSIC
Consumer Services
51%similar
debt/equitymarket cap
Process Industries
58%similar
volatilityoperating margin
Process Industries
45%similar
promoter holdingdebt/equity
SUDEEP PHARMASUDEEPPHRM
Process Industries
45%similar
ROCEoperating margin

Similarity is statistical, based on reported metrics; it does not imply similar business quality or future returns.

What changed?

13 events since Oct '24

  1. AugValuationP/E crossed above the 90th percentile of its own history to date (148.5x).
  2. AugPriceVolume reached 5.8x its 50-day median on 2026-08-19; price +9.5% that day.
  3. JunPriceRegained the 2025-11 peak, 3 months after the low.
  4. MayPriceVolume reached 46.6x its 50-day median on 2026-05-14; price +10.9% that day.
  5. MarPriceFell 46% from the Nov 2025 peak to the Mar 2026 low.
  6. JanPriceVolume reached 5.2x its 50-day median on 2026-01-28; price +9.0% that day.
  7. NovPriceRegained the 2024-11 peak, 8 months after the low.
  8. NovPriceVolume reached 102.9x its 50-day median on 2025-11-03; price +12.1% that day.
Show 5 earlier events
  1. JulPriceVolume reached 11.2x its 50-day median on 2025-07-22; price -0.1% that day.
  2. JunPriceVolume reached 13.9x its 50-day median on 2025-06-18; price +5.5% that day.
  3. MarPriceFell 45% from the Nov 2024 peak to the Mar 2025 low.
  4. JanPriceVolume reached 7.4x its 50-day median on 2025-01-21; price -0.2% that day.
  5. OctPriceVolume reached 12.7x its 50-day median on 2024-10-18; price -5.2% that day.

Events are generated from the data by fixed rules.
The month shown is when the change became visible in the reported figures, assuming a 60-day lag after each quarter end; it is not an announcement date.

Where price and fundamentals disagree, market-wide Rewind the whole market to any month

Monthly history28 months · 2024-08 to 2026-11
MonthP/ERevenue (TTM)ROEROCEDebt / Equity
2026-11140.6x₹286 cr25.6%30.0%0.0x
2026-10122.0x₹286 cr25.7%30.0%0.0x
2026-09132.5x₹286 cr25.7%30.0%0.0x
2026-08148.5x₹257 cr22.4%30.0%0.0x
2026-07102.0x₹257 cr22.4%30.0%0.0x
2026-06100.9x₹257 cr22.4%30.0%0.0x
2026-0589.0x₹237 cr25.8%26.0%0.0x
2026-0464.6x₹237 cr25.8%26.0%0.0x
2026-0352.3x₹237 cr25.8%26.0%0.0x
2026-0271.4x₹228 cr23.7%26.0%0.0x
2026-0175.0x₹228 cr23.7%26.0%0.0x
2025-1296.1x₹228 cr23.7%26.0%0.0x
2025-11114.7x₹213 cr21.1%26.0%0.0x
2025-1088.8x₹213 cr21.1%26.0%0.0x
2025-0973.1x₹213 cr21.1%26.0%0.0x
2025-0870.6x₹200 cr19.1%26.0%0.0x
2025-0778.5x₹200 cr19.1%26.0%0.0x
2025-0686.5x₹200 cr19.1%26.0%0.0x
2025-0595.0x₹188 cr22.2%23.0%0.1x
2025-0482.2x₹188 cr22.2%23.0%0.1x
2025-0369.4x₹188 cr22.2%23.0%0.1x
2025-0274.0x₹165 cr19.6%23.0%0.1x
2025-0188.9x₹165 cr19.6%23.0%0.1x
2024-12105.9x₹165 cr19.6%23.0%0.1x
2024-11119.4x₹148 cr17.7%23.0%0.1x
2024-10106.0x₹148 cr17.7%23.0%0.1x
2024-0986.1x₹148 cr17.7%23.0%0.1x
2024-08107.8x₹133 cr16.5%23.0%0.1x

Methodology and data notes

Methodology

Methodology and data notes

All figures come from public exchange prices and screener.in financial statements. Quarterly and annual results are shown from 60 days after the period end, so a month never uses a result before it would plausibly have been published. Statements are the latest versions, which may include later restatements.

Sector medians, percentiles and indices use today's listed companies in the sector (survivorship bias). Prices are adjusted for splits and bonus issues; around a corporate action the fundamentals may lag the price by up to a month, and affected sections are hidden.

The return decomposition uses price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count. The reverse DCF uses a fixed 12% cost of equity, a 10-year horizon and a 15x terminal P/E, and is an illustration only. Events, flags and twins follow fixed rules and thresholds described next to each section.

Feedback