CYIENT LIMITED (CYIENT): Financials & Fundamentals History

Share price

Closing priceAdjusted for splits and bonus issues.

3M1Y3YAll

₹1,092.6 latest close · +22.7% over the last 90 sessions

₹1,092.6 month-end · −2.8% over 12 months

₹1,092.6 month-end · −43.5% over 3 years

₹1,092.6 month-end · +79.3% since Jan '19

52-week range ₹750.30 to ₹1277.00 · 1-year volatility 35.8%

Was the rally earned?

1 year3 years5 years

-3%share price, 1 yearRoughly flat

The share price was roughly flat over 1 year (-3%).
The share count rose 3%.

Net profit growth-46 ptsNet profit fell about 38%, which lowers the price.

P/E change+47 ptsThe P/E rose from 19.9x to 32.1x, which lifts the price.

Share count change-3 ptsShare count rose 3%, which lowers the price.

-44%share price, 3 yearsEarnings and multiple

Both mattered.

Per-share earnings took off 24 points and the multiple took off 20 points (P/E 41.6x to 32.1x).
The share count rose 9%.

Net profit growth-17 ptsNet profit fell about 20%, which lowers the price.

P/E change-20 ptsThe P/E fell from 41.6x to 32.1x, which lowers the price.

Share count change-7 ptsShare count rose 9%, which lowers the price.

+8%share price, 5 yearsEarnings and multiple

Both mattered.

Per-share earnings added 3 points and the multiple added 5 points (P/E 30.6x to 32.1x).
The share count rose 10%.

Net profit growth+13 ptsNet profit rose about 13%, which lifts the price.

P/E change+5 ptsThe P/E rose from 30.6x to 32.1x, which lifts the price.

Share count change-9 ptsShare count rose 10%, which lowers the price.

What do "pts" mean?

"pts" are percentage points of the share price return. The parts add up to the total shown for each period. Because price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count, higher profit pushes the price up, a higher P/E pushes it up, and more shares push it down.

Example: if the price rose 34% and profit growth accounts for +58 pts while a lower P/E accounts for -24 pts, then 58 - 24 = 34. The +58 is not the profit growth rate itself: it is the part of the price move that profit growth explains.

Net profit is trailing twelve months as reported with a 60-day lag.

Compare this with TATA CONSULTANCY SERVICES

How rough has the ride been?

Maximum drawdown-72.6%recovered 2021-03

1-year volatility35.8%annualised

Beta vs sector index0.863-year daily, correlation 0.46

Volume spikes11last 90 sessions, 5x the 50-day median

Drawdown from peak

Largest drawdowns

-72.6% (2019-03 peak to 2020-05 low, recovered 2021-03)

-68.5% (2023-12 peak to 2026-03 low, not yet recovered)

-40.5% (2021-10 peak to 2022-11 low, recovered 2023-05)

Most recent volume spikes

2026-10-23: 41x the 50-day median, price +7.8% that day

2026-10-09: 9.3x the 50-day median, price +6.8% that day

2026-09-30: 5.8x the 50-day median, price +4.3% that day

Beta is the slope of daily returns against a market-cap-weighted index of the sector's other listed companies, built from today's constituents (so it excludes companies no longer listed).

Is it expensive against its own past and its peers?

32.1xP/E todayNear its historic high

Against its own history83rd percentile

CheapestMedian 21.6xDearest

Usual range 10.7x to 33.8x since 2019-01.

Against Technology Services32.1x vs 21.1x

This company

32.1x

Sector median

21.1x

52% above the Technology Services median.

P/EP/BP/S

P/E (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianTechnology Services median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/B (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianTechnology Services median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/S (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianTechnology Services median

How to read this

Shaded band: 10th to 90th percentile of the company's own P/E history; dotted line: its median; orange line: sector median (companies with a positive multiple, at least 5 in the sector).

Sector figures are built from today's listed companies, so they exclude companies that are no longer listed.

All terms explained in the glossary →

How Technology Services is valued

Where does it rank among Technology Services peers?

Each cell is the company's percentile rank among its Technology Services peers (non-financial companies) that month.
Darker is better-ranked.
Rows marked ↓ are inverted (lower debt, shorter cash cycle and a lower P/E rank higher).

Where it ranks today

ROCE39th▼ 16 pts vs a year ago
Op. margin45thflat vs a year ago
Revenue growth28th▼ 7 pts vs a year ago
EPS growth12th▼ 23 pts vs a year ago
Debt/equity ↓53rd▲ 6 pts vs a year ago
Cash cycle ↓24th▲ 4 pts vs a year ago
P/E ↓34th▼ 38 pts vs a year ago
12M momentum72nd▲ 52 pts vs a year ago

Rank history

ROCE

Op. margin

Revenue growth

EPS growth

Debt/equity ↓

Cash cycle ↓

P/E ↓

12M momentum

Dec '21Jul '22Jan '23Jul '23Jan '24Jul '24Jan '25Jul '25Jan '26Jul '26Nov '26

Lower rank Higher rank Not enough data

Percentiles use today's listed companies in the sector and need at least 5 peers with a value; grey cells have too few.
ROE is computed from net profit and book value where the source does not report it.

The Technology Services sector page Watch it move against Technology Services in the Observatory

What is the price implying?

~14%annual earnings growth implied by the priceAbove delivered growth

At normalised P/E (five-year average earnings) of 23.4x, a holder earning 12%/yr needs earnings to grow about 14.0%/yr for 10 years, then trade at 15x.

Delivered5.7%/yrEPS, last 10 fiscal years · 3-yr avg to 3-yr avg

Gap+8.3 ptsimplied minus delivered

Rank362ndmost demanding of 856

Over time

Implied growth by month (solid) and delivered growth (dashed).

Change the assumptions

Exit P/E / return	11%	12%	13%
12x	15.2%	16.2%	17.2%
15x	13.0%	14.0%	15.0%
20x	10.2%	11.2%	12.2%

Drag a slider to test other assumptions

Required return 12.0% Years 10 Exit P/E 15x Implied: 14.0%/yr

Looking back

Jan 2020Price implied 6%/yr; EPS has since grown −1%/yr (7.0 yrs)
Jan 2021Price implied 11%/yr; EPS has since grown 5%/yr (6.0 yrs)
Jan 2022Price implied 17%/yr; EPS has since grown 5%/yr (5.0 yrs)

Past comparisons cover only companies listed today (survivorship bias) and say nothing about future outcomes.

“Implied growth” is what the current price would require under our stated assumptions, not what we expect. How this is calculated and the market-wide lists.

What prices imply across Technology Services The market-wide Expectations lists

Key figures

Share Priceclose 9 Nov: ₹1092.60
P/E: 32.1x
ROCE: 12.0%
Market Cap: ₹12144 cr
Revenue (TTM): ₹7632 cr
P/S: 1.6x
P/B: 2.1x
ROE: 6.7%
Operating Margin: 13.0%
Debt / Equity: 0.1x
Promoter Holding: 23.3%
12M Momentum: -2.8%

52-week range

₹750.30₹1277.00

65% of the way from its 52-week low to its high

Price risk

1Y volatility

35.8%

Beta vs sector

1-year daily

0.81

Balance sheet & cash

Interest cover

operating profit ÷ interest

10.1x

Cash from profit, 3Y

operating cash flow ÷ net profit

1.27x

Share count, 1Y

unchanged

Are profits backed by cash?

6 of 7checks within range1 near a threshold

Other income reliance4%Within range

Other income as a share of pre-tax profit (trailing twelve months): 3.6%. Bands: below 15%, 15% to 35%, above 35%.

Tax rate27%Within range

Median quarterly effective tax rate over about 2.5 years: 27.0%. Bands: 15% to 35%, 5% to 15% or 35% to 50%, outside 5% to 50%.

Cash conversion1.27xWithin range

Operating cash flow divided by net profit over the last three fiscal years: 1.27x (cash from operations ₹2,303 cr, net profit ₹1,814 cr). Bands: 0.8x and above, 0.5x to 0.8x, below 0.5x.

Free cash flow5 of 5 yrsWithin range

Fiscal years with positive free cash flow in the last 5: 5. Bands: at least 80% of years, 40% to 80%, below 40%.

Receivable days vs history-2 daysWithin range

Debtor days are below the median of the previous three fiscal years by 2 days (66 vs 68). Bands: under 15 days, 15 to 45, over 45.

Capital work in progress0% of fixed assetsWithin range

Capital work-in-progress is 0% of fixed assets. Bands: not rising or up to 30%; rising for three years and above 30%; rising and above 60%.

Payable days+60 days / 2 yrsNear threshold

Days payable changed by +60 over two years. Bands: rise of up to 30 days; more than 30 days.

Tap a check to see how it is measured

How to read this

Each check is a named rule with fixed thresholds, not a score. Annual statements are the latest restated figures, so a past year may differ from what was originally reported.

All terms explained in the glossary →

Who has been buying and selling?

Over 2 years, FIIs trimmed 19.6 pts; DIIs added 16.3 pts.
The number of shareholders rose from 1.6 lakh to 2.6 lakh (+63%) between Dec 2023 and Jun 2026.

Holdings, Jun '26

How each group changed

GroupDec '23Jun '26Change

Promoters23.2%23.3%+0.1 pts

FIIs34.1%14.5%-19.6 pts

DIIs22.7%39.0%+16.3 pts

Public and others19.1%22.7%+3.6 pts

Number of shareholders

2.6 lakhshareholders+63% since Dec '23

Quarterly shareholding as reported, labelled by the quarter it covers (it becomes visible about two months later).
Shareholder counts are only available for recent quarters.

This quarter's smart-money board

What happened next to similar setups

−12.8%typical 12-month return vs the marketNot meaningfully different from the base rate

We found 50 past situations where a non-financial company looked like CYIENT LIMITED today on valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, price momentum, size and volatility.
Over the following 12 months the middle half of them returned −30% to +15% vs the market, against −3% for all non-financial companies in the same months.
The gap against the base rate (−9.4%, 80% range −19.1% to +2.0%) is within what chance and overlapping periods produce.

Where the 50 outcomes landed

Each dot is one past situation (hover or tap for details) · Solid dots are the closest matches, listed below · Shaded is the middle half of all companies in the same months · 4 beyond the range shown, drawn at the edge

Similar setups' median

−12.8%

All companies' median

−3.4%

Beat the market

42% vs 46%

50 past situations · 50 companies · 36 months · 2020–2025

The closest matches

Company	When	P/E	ROCE	12M mom.	Drawdown	Next 12 months
ZENSARTECH Technology Services	May 2024	41x	15%	+65%	−5%	+30%
CIEINDIA Producer Manufacturing	Oct 2022	29x	11%	+13%	−6%	+40%
MAHSEAMLES Non-Energy Minerals	Nov 2021	34x	9%	+89%	−11%	+40%
APLLTD Health Technology	May 2025	33x	13%	+10%	−18%	−29%
STARCEMENT Producer Manufacturing	Dec 2024	47x	16%	+32%	−5%	−8%

Show the other 3 matches

Company	When	P/E	ROCE	12M mom.	Drawdown	Next 12 months
JTEKTINDIA Consumer Durables	May 2024	53x	—	+37%	−7%	−22%
GABRIEL Producer Manufacturing	Sep 2024	38x	—	+56%	−6%	+148%
SANSERA Producer Manufacturing	Oct 2025	40x	14%	0%	−7%	+187%

How reliable is this?

Matched on P/E, P/S, ROCE, operating margin, debt/equity, interest cover, revenue growth, 12-month momentum, drawdown from 12-month high, size and volatility. Closest on: 12-month momentum, P/S and drawdown from 12-month high. One match per company and at most 7 from any one month.

Independent periods: the matches fall in 6 distinct 12-month windows. Matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, so fewer windows means less evidence.

How this is built

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to CYIENT LIMITED. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

Methodology

How historical analogs are built

Data as of 2026-11-09. Outcome pool: Jan 2020 to Oct 2025.

For every company we look at the situation it is in today (valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, 12-month price momentum, drawdown, size and volatility) and find past company-months that looked most like it. We then show what happened to those past situations over the following 12 months, measured against the ApnaFunda All index and against the base rate. It describes history. It does not predict anything.

What is compared

Feature	Weight	Non-financial	Financial
P/E	1	yes	yes
P/S	1	yes	—
P/B	1	—	yes
ROCE	1	yes	—
operating margin	1	yes	—
ROE	1	—	yes
debt/equity	0.75	yes	—
interest cover	0.5	yes	—
revenue growth	0.75	yes	yes
12-month momentum	1	yes	yes
drawdown from 12-month high	0.75	yes	yes
size	0.75	yes	yes
volatility	0.5	yes	yes

Weights were set by judgement before any outcome was looked at and are never tuned on results. Loss-making companies (negative P/E or net profit) are only matched with other loss-making companies. Banks, NBFCs and insurers are compared only with each other and use a different feature set. Every feature is converted, month by month, to its rank among companies in the same pool in that month, so a P/E of 30 in a hot market and a P/E of 22 in a cold one can match if both were equally expensive for their time. Only that month's data is used.

How closeness and the sample are defined

Distance is the weighted root-mean-square gap between the standardised features both companies have. A match needs at least 70% of the query's feature weight, a distance of at most 0.9, and 30 matches at minimum to be shown. We keep up to 50 matches with these exclusions: never the company itself, one match per company (its closest month), and at most 7 from any one calendar month so a single market episode cannot dominate.

Base rate

The base rate is the distribution of 12-month returns, relative to the market, of every eligible company-month in the same pool, with each month weighted to match the months the analogs came from. It answers: how did a random company do in these same months? Because matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, we also report the number of distinct 12-month windows behind a result, and a bootstrap that resamples months decides whether the analog median differs from the base rate at all. "Not meaningfully different" is the usual outcome and the page copy is written for it.

Limits you should know

One market period. The outcome pool covers 2020–2025 only (70 months), including the 2020 crash and the 2020–21 rally.
Survivorship. Only companies listed today are included. Delisted and bankrupt companies are missing, which flatters past outcomes, particularly for distressed-looking setups.
Price return only. Dividends are excluded, and the benchmark is an ApnaFunda market-cap-weighted index of the same listed companies, not an official index.
Reporting lag. Fundamentals are matched on an assumed 60-day lag after the quarter end, not on real announcement dates.
Pools: non-financial: 98,395 company-months from 2019 companies; financial: 5,659 company-months from 108 companies. 2349 companies currently have a result; the rest are suppressed because too few comparable situations exist.

Does it work? A walk-forward check

The walk-forward check has not been run for this build, so skill is shown as not yet measured.

Disclaimer

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to any company shown. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

What else looks like this?

Companies with the most similar financial profile today, regardless of industry.

EXIDE INDUSTRIESEXIDEIND

Producer Manufacturing

70%similar

revenue growthP/E

WHIRLPOOL OF INDIAWHIRLPOOL

Consumer Durables

67%similar

revenuedebt/equity

DR REDDYS LABORATORIESDRREDDY

Health Technology

66%similar

EPS growthpromoter holding

CARBORUNDUM UNIVERSALCARBORUNIV

Process Industries

65%similar

ROCEvolatility

MAHANAGAR GASMGL

Utilities

65%similar

revenuemarket cap

INTELLECT DESIGN ARENAINTELLECT

Technology Services

56%similar

promoter holdingdebt/equity

MPHASISMPHASIS

Technology Services

53%similar

promoter holdingrevenue growth

TECH MAHINDRATECHM

Technology Services

53%similar

debt/equityP/E

Similarity is statistical, based on reported metrics; it does not imply similar business quality or future returns.

What changed?

30 events since Apr '22

2026
OctPriceVolume reached 41.0x its 50-day median on 2026-10-23; price +7.8% that day.
SepResultsRevenue (TTM) reached a new high of ₹7,632 cr.
AugPriceVolume reached 35.9x its 50-day median on 2026-08-26; price +7.0% that day.
JunPeer rankSlipped to the 3rd quartile of Technology Services on ROCE (from the 2nd quartile).
AprPriceVolume reached 8.6x its 50-day median on 2026-04-15; price +7.4% that day.
MarPriceFell 68% from the Dec 2023 peak to the Mar 2026 low.
2025
OctPriceVolume reached 7.1x its 50-day median on 2025-10-17; price -0.8% that day.
JulPriceVolume reached 9.5x its 50-day median on 2025-07-25; price +0.1% that day.

Show 22 earlier events

2025
JunResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned negative.
AprPriceVolume reached 12.6x its 50-day median on 2025-04-25; price -5.8% that day.
MarPeer rankSlipped to the 3rd quartile of Technology Services on operating margin (from the 2nd quartile).
JanPriceVolume reached 49.6x its 50-day median on 2025-01-24; price -23.4% that day.
2024
DecResultsRevenue (TTM) reached a new high of ₹7,207 cr.
OctPriceVolume reached 7.8x its 50-day median on 2024-10-25; price +1.2% that day.
JulPriceVolume reached 10.3x its 50-day median on 2024-07-26; price -5.5% that day.
JunResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned positive.
JunPeer rankMoved into the 2nd quartile of Technology Services on EPS growth (from the 3rd quartile).
AprPriceVolume reached 7.1x its 50-day median on 2024-04-26; price -1.5% that day.
2023
SepPriceVolume reached 7.9x its 50-day median on 2023-09-05; price +7.1% that day.
JunResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned negative.
JunValuationP/E crossed above the 90th percentile of its own history to date (32.3x).
JunPeer rankSlipped to the 3rd quartile of Technology Services on EPS growth (from the 2nd quartile).
MayPriceRegained the 2021-10 peak, 6 months after the low.
AprPriceVolume reached 21.8x its 50-day median on 2023-04-21; price +6.3% that day.
JanPriceVolume reached 13.9x its 50-day median on 2023-01-13; price -0.7% that day.
2022
NovPriceFell 40% from the Oct 2021 peak to the Nov 2022 low.
NovPriceVolume reached 7.1x its 50-day median on 2022-11-17; price +2.0% that day.
JulPriceVolume reached 5.3x its 50-day median on 2022-07-08; price +4.8% that day.
JunPeer rankMoved into the 2nd quartile of Technology Services on ROCE (from the 3rd quartile).
AprPriceVolume reached 26.8x its 50-day median on 2022-04-22; price +10.3% that day.

Events are generated from the data by fixed rules.
The month shown is when the change became visible in the reported figures, assuming a 60-day lag after each quarter end; it is not an announcement date.

Where price and fundamentals disagree, market-wide Rewind the whole market to any month

Monthly history60 months · 2021-12 to 2026-11

Month	P/E	Revenue (TTM)	ROE	ROCE	Debt / Equity
2026-11	32.1x	₹7632 cr	6.7%	12.0%	0.1x
2026-10	33.3x	₹7632 cr	6.7%	12.0%	0.1x
2026-09	32.3x	₹7632 cr	6.7%	12.0%	0.1x
2026-08	30.5x	₹7268 cr	7.5%	12.0%	0.1x
2026-07	22.0x	₹7268 cr	7.5%	12.0%	0.1x
2026-06	22.6x	₹7268 cr	7.5%	12.0%	0.1x
2026-05	18.6x	₹7250 cr	10.1%	17.0%	0.1x
2026-04	17.8x	₹7250 cr	10.1%	17.0%	0.1x
2026-03	15.4x	₹7250 cr	10.1%	17.0%	0.1x
2026-02	17.7x	₹7328 cr	10.7%	17.0%	0.1x
2026-01	22.0x	₹7328 cr	10.7%	17.0%	0.1x
2025-12	21.6x	₹7328 cr	10.7%	17.0%	0.1x
2025-11	19.9x	₹7396 cr	11.4%	17.0%	0.1x
2025-10	20.6x	₹7396 cr	11.4%	17.0%	0.1x
2025-09	20.3x	₹7396 cr	11.4%	17.0%	0.1x
2025-08	21.1x	₹7360 cr	11.3%	17.0%	0.1x
2025-07	21.7x	₹7360 cr	11.3%	17.0%	0.1x
2025-06	23.2x	₹7360 cr	11.3%	17.0%	0.1x
2025-05	23.5x	₹7312 cr	14.3%	22.0%	0.2x
2025-04	20.8x	₹7312 cr	14.3%	22.0%	0.2x
2025-03	22.1x	₹7312 cr	14.3%	22.0%	0.2x
2025-02	21.3x	₹7207 cr	14.8%	22.0%	0.2x
2025-01	24.5x	₹7207 cr	14.8%	22.0%	0.2x
2024-12	30.9x	₹7207 cr	14.8%	22.0%	0.2x
2024-11	31.2x	₹7136 cr	14.7%	22.0%	0.2x
2024-10	30.9x	₹7136 cr	14.7%	22.0%	0.2x
2024-09	31.7x	₹7136 cr	14.7%	22.0%	0.2x
2024-08	32.1x	₹7147 cr	15.2%	22.0%	0.2x
2024-07	28.5x	₹7147 cr	15.2%	22.0%	0.2x
2024-06	29.8x	₹7147 cr	15.2%	22.0%	0.2x
2024-05	37.3x	₹6016 cr	13.7%	20.0%	0.4x
2024-04	38.8x	₹6016 cr	13.7%	20.0%	0.4x
2024-03	42.9x	₹6016 cr	13.7%	20.0%	0.4x
2024-02	43.5x	₹6016 cr	13.7%	20.0%	0.4x
2024-01	42.4x	₹6016 cr	13.7%	20.0%	0.4x
2023-12	49.3x	₹6016 cr	13.7%	20.0%	0.4x
2023-11	41.6x	₹6016 cr	13.7%	20.0%	0.4x
2023-10	34.1x	₹6016 cr	13.7%	20.0%	0.4x
2023-09	36.4x	₹6016 cr	13.7%	20.0%	0.4x
2023-08	35.2x	₹6016 cr	13.7%	20.0%	0.4x
2023-07	31.5x	₹6016 cr	13.7%	20.0%	0.4x
2023-06	32.3x	₹6016 cr	13.7%	20.0%	0.4x
2023-05	27.4x	₹4534 cr	15.4%	20.0%	0.2x
2023-04	24.9x	₹4534 cr	15.4%	20.0%	0.2x
2023-03	21.0x	₹4534 cr	15.4%	20.0%	0.2x
2023-02	19.9x	₹4534 cr	15.4%	20.0%	0.2x
2023-01	18.6x	₹4534 cr	15.4%	20.0%	0.2x
2022-12	17.1x	₹4534 cr	15.4%	20.0%	0.2x
2022-11	17.7x	₹4534 cr	15.4%	20.0%	0.2x
2022-10	15.8x	₹4534 cr	15.4%	20.0%	0.2x
2022-09	16.7x	₹4534 cr	15.4%	20.0%	0.2x
2022-08	17.8x	₹4534 cr	15.4%	20.0%	0.2x
2022-07	17.4x	₹4534 cr	15.4%	20.0%	0.2x
2022-06	16.0x	₹4534 cr	15.4%	20.0%	0.2x
2022-05	23.7x	₹4132 cr	11.3%	15.0%	0.2x
2022-04	26.8x	₹4132 cr	11.3%	15.0%	0.2x
2022-03	28.1x	₹4132 cr	11.3%	15.0%	0.2x
2022-02	24.7x	₹4132 cr	11.3%	15.0%	0.2x
2022-01	28.4x	₹4132 cr	11.3%	15.0%	0.2x
2021-12	30.9x	₹4132 cr	11.3%	15.0%	0.2x

Older months are in the live observatory.

Methodology and data notes