अApnaFunda

GABRIEL INDIA LTD (GABRIEL)

Producer Manufacturing · Auto Parts: OEM · figures to Nov '26

Quality scoreHow the business itself ranks against its sector peers on profitability, 3-year growth and leverage. 50 is the middle of the sector.74 / 100
Profitability 60Balance sheet 88
Momentum scoreHow strong the recent trend is: 3-month price change, 12-month improvement in earnings and the rise in FII + DII holding, among companies above ₹500 cr.39 / 100
Price 57Earnings 44FII/DII 17

Passes these screensQuality CompounderDebt-light & profitablePromoters buying

Share price

Closing priceAdjusted for splits and bonus issues.

₹1,420.2 latest close · +15.3% over the last 90 sessions

₹1,200₹1,400₹1,600Jul 3Jul 29Aug 24Sep 17Oct 14Nov 9 ₹1,200₹1,400₹1,600Jul 3Sep 4Nov 9

₹1,420.2 month-end · +38.1% over 12 months

₹800₹1,000₹1,200₹1,400Nov '25Jan '26Apr '26Jun '26Sep '26Nov '26 ₹800₹1,000₹1,200₹1,400Nov '25May '26Nov '26

₹1,420.2 month-end · +193.4% since Jun '24

₹500₹1,000₹1,500Jun '24Dec '24Jun '25Nov '25May '26Nov '26 ₹500₹1,000₹1,500Jun '24Sep '25Nov '26

52-week range ₹795.70 to ₹1600.00 · 1-year volatility 49.4%

Was the rally earned?

+38%share price, 1 yearEarnings-driven

Mostly yes.

  • Per-share earnings added 27 points to the rise, while the multiple moved less (P/E 50.5x to 55.6x).
  • The share count rose 13%.
Net profit growth: +41 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+41 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: +11 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+11 ptsP/E changeShare count change: −14 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−14 ptsShare count changeShare price: +38%+38%Share priceNet profit growth: +41 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+41ProfitP/E change: +11 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+11P/EShare count change: −14 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−14SharesShare price: +38%+38%Share price
Net profit growth+41 ptsNet profit rose about 42%, which lifts the price.
P/E change+11 ptsThe P/E rose from 50.5x to 55.6x, which lifts the price.
Share count change-14 ptsShare count rose 13%, which lowers the price.
What do "pts" mean?

"pts" are percentage points of the share price return. The parts add up to the total shown for each period. Because price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count, higher profit pushes the price up, a higher P/E pushes it up, and more shares push it down.

Example: if the price rose 34% and profit growth accounts for +58 pts while a lower P/E accounts for -24 pts, then 58 - 24 = 34. The +58 is not the profit growth rate itself: it is the part of the price move that profit growth explains.

Not shown for 3 years and 5 years: earnings were negative at one end, or there is not enough history.

Net profit is trailing twelve months as reported with a 60-day lag.

Compare this with SAMVARDHANA MOTHERSON INT

How rough has the ride been?

Maximum drawdown-72.1%recovered 2021-08
1-year volatility49.4%annualised
Beta vs sector index1.123-year daily, correlation 0.46
Volume spikes7last 90 sessions, 5x the 50-day median

Drawdown from peak

0%−20%−40%−60%2020202120222023202420252026−67.1% 0%−20%−40%−60%2020202220242026−67.1%
Largest drawdowns

-72.1% (2019-02 peak to 2020-03 low, recovered 2021-08)

-37.5% (2025-09 peak to 2026-03 low, recovered 2026-07)

-35.2% (2023-12 peak to 2024-03 low, recovered 2024-06)

Most recent volume spikes

2026-10-19: 12.3x the 50-day median, price +2.6% that day

2026-09-23: 5.4x the 50-day median, price -2.9% that day

2026-09-22: 27.6x the 50-day median, price +14.0% that day

Beta is the slope of daily returns against a market-cap-weighted index of the sector's other listed companies, built from today's constituents (so it excludes companies no longer listed).

Is it expensive against its own past and its peers?

55.6xP/E todayNear its historic high
Against its own history83rd percentile
CheapestMedian 42.9xDearest

Usual range 32.7x to 58.3x since 2024-06.

Against Producer Manufacturing55.6x vs 29.6x
This company
55.6x
Sector median
29.6x

88% above the Producer Manufacturing median.

25.3x39.4x53.5x67.6xJun '24Dec '24Jun '25Dec '25Jun '26Nov '2625.3x39.4x53.5x67.6xJun '24Apr '25Feb '26Nov '26
P/E (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianProducer Manufacturing median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/B (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianProducer Manufacturing median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/S (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianProducer Manufacturing median
How to read this

Shaded band: 10th to 90th percentile of the company's own P/E history; dotted line: its median; orange line: sector median (companies with a positive multiple, at least 5 in the sector).

Sector figures are built from today's listed companies, so they exclude companies that are no longer listed.

All terms explained in the glossary →

How Producer Manufacturing is valued

Where does it rank among Producer Manufacturing peers?

Each cell is the company's percentile rank among its Producer Manufacturing peers (non-financial companies) that month.
Darker is better-ranked.
Rows marked ↓ are inverted (lower debt, shorter cash cycle and a lower P/E rank higher).

Where it ranks today

  • ROCE85thflat vs a year ago
  • Op. margin35th▼ 6 pts vs a year ago
  • Revenue growth69th▼ 8 pts vs a year ago
  • EPS growth65th▼ 20 pts vs a year ago
  • Debt/equity ↓67th▼ 7 pts vs a year ago
  • Cash cycle ↓88thflat vs a year ago
  • P/E ↓19th▼ 10 pts vs a year ago
  • 12M momentum82nd▼ 17 pts vs a year ago

Rank history

ROCE
Op. margin
Revenue growth
EPS growth
Debt/equity ↓
Cash cycle ↓
P/E ↓
12M momentum
Dec '21Jul '22Jan '23Jul '23Jan '24Jul '24Jan '25Jul '25Jan '26Jul '26Nov '26
Lower rank Higher rank Not enough data

Percentiles use today's listed companies in the sector and need at least 5 peers with a value; grey cells have too few.
ROE is computed from net profit and book value where the source does not report it.

The Producer Manufacturing sector page Watch it move against Producer Manufacturing in the Observatory

What is the price implying?

~26%annual earnings growth implied by the price

At a P/E of 55.6x, the price would imply about 26.3%/yr earnings growth for 10 years under the same assumptions, but it is not ranked.

Fewer than six years of annual earnings are available, which is too little to measure delivered growth.

“Implied growth” is what the current price would require under our stated assumptions, not what we expect.

What prices imply across Producer Manufacturing The market-wide Expectations lists

Key figures

Share Priceclose 9 Nov
₹1420.20
P/E
55.6x
ROCE
26.0%
Market Cap
₹25170 cr
Revenue (TTM)
₹5294 cr
P/S
4.8x
P/B
18.4x
ROE
33.1%
Operating Margin
9.0%
Debt / Equity
0.1x
Promoter Holding
63.5%
12M Momentum
38.1%

52-week range

₹795.70₹1600.00
78% of the way from its 52-week low to its high

Price risk

1Y volatility
49.4%
Beta vs sector
1-year daily
1.07

Balance sheet & cash

Interest cover
operating profit ÷ interest
22.0x
Cash from profit, 3Y
operating cash flow ÷ net profit
1.07x
Share count, 1Y
unchanged

Are profits backed by cash?

5 of 7checks within range2 near a threshold
Other income reliance28%Near threshold

Other income as a share of pre-tax profit (trailing twelve months): 28.2%. Bands: below 15%, 15% to 35%, above 35%.

Tax rate23%Within range

Median quarterly effective tax rate over about 2.5 years: 23.0%. Bands: 15% to 35%, 5% to 15% or 35% to 50%, outside 5% to 50%.

Cash conversion1.07xWithin range

Operating cash flow divided by net profit over the last three fiscal years: 1.07x (cash from operations ₹726 cr, net profit ₹676 cr). Bands: 0.8x and above, 0.5x to 0.8x, below 0.5x.

Free cash flow2 of 3 yrsNear threshold

Fiscal years with positive free cash flow in the last 3: 2. Bands: at least 80% of years, 40% to 80%, below 40%.

Receivable days vs history-1 daysWithin range

Debtor days are below the median of the previous three fiscal years by 1 days (53 vs 54). Bands: under 15 days, 15 to 45, over 45.

Capital work in progress13% of fixed assetsWithin range

Capital work-in-progress is 13% of fixed assets. Bands: not rising or up to 30%; rising for three years and above 30%; rising and above 60%.

Payable days-6 days / 2 yrsWithin range

Days payable changed by -6 over two years. Bands: rise of up to 30 days; more than 30 days.

Tap a check to see how it is measured

How to read this

Each check is a named rule with fixed thresholds, not a score. Annual statements are the latest restated figures, so a past year may differ from what was originally reported.

All terms explained in the glossary →

Who has been buying and selling?

  • Over 2 years, promoters added 8.5 pts; FIIs added 2.3 pts; DIIs added 0.8 pts.
  • The number of shareholders rose from 1.2 lakh to 1.3 lakh (+8%) between Dec 2023 and Jun 2026.

Holdings, Jun '26

How each group changed

GroupDec '23Jun '26Change
Promoters55.0%63.5%+8.5 pts
FIIs4.1%6.3%+2.3 pts
DIIs12.2%12.9%+0.8 pts
Public and others28.7%17.2%-11.6 pts

Number of shareholders

1.3 lakhshareholders+8% since Dec '23
1.2L1.3L1.4L1.5L Dec '23Jun '24Dec '24Jun '25Dec '25Jun '26
Dec '23: 1.2 lakh
Mar '24: 1.3 lakh
Jun '24: 1.4 lakh
Sep '24: 1.4 lakh
Dec '24: 1.4 lakh
Mar '25: 1.4 lakh
Jun '25: 1.4 lakh
Sep '25: 1.5 lakh
Dec '25: 1.5 lakh
Mar '26: 1.4 lakh
Jun '26: 1.3 lakh
1.2L1.3L1.4L1.5L Dec '23Dec '24Dec '25Jun '26
Dec '23: 1.2 lakh
Mar '24: 1.3 lakh
Jun '24: 1.4 lakh
Sep '24: 1.4 lakh
Dec '24: 1.4 lakh
Mar '25: 1.4 lakh
Jun '25: 1.4 lakh
Sep '25: 1.5 lakh
Dec '25: 1.5 lakh
Mar '26: 1.4 lakh
Jun '26: 1.3 lakh

Quarterly shareholding as reported, labelled by the quarter it covers (it becomes visible about two months later).
Shareholder counts are only available for recent quarters.

This quarter's smart-money board

What happened next to similar setups

−6.9%typical 12-month return vs the marketBelow the base rate
  • We found 50 past situations where a non-financial company looked like GABRIEL INDIA LTD today on valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, price momentum, size and volatility.
  • Over the following 12 months the middle half of them returned −17% to +18% vs the market, against −1% for all non-financial companies in the same months.
  • The analogs' median sat below that base rate (gap −6.3%, 80% range −12.4% to −1.3%), but the matches cluster in only 6 distinct 12-month windows.

Where the 50 outcomes landed

−60%−40%−20%0%+20%+40%+60%+80%
INTELLECT · Jan 2022: −42.4% vs market
MIDHANI · Jul 2020: −39.4% vs market
VAIBHAVGBL · Jan 2021: −34.5% vs market
RHIM · Jan 2023: −33.1% vs market
KIOCL · Jun 2021: −32.7% vs market
BETA · Apr 2025: −30.4% vs market
FINEORG · Aug 2022: −29.1% vs market
KIRLOSBROS · Nov 2024: −28.6% vs market
SUPREMEIND · Jun 2024: −27.8% vs market
RSYSTEMS · Dec 2021: −24.6% vs market
LTTS · Sep 2021: −23.8% vs market
ACE · May 2024: −17.0% vs market
FLUOROCHEM · Aug 2022: −16.8% vs market
APLAPOLLO · Mar 2023: −16.5% vs market
KPRMILL · May 2022: −16.3% vs market
KEI · May 2024: −16.2% vs market
KSB · May 2024: −15.2% vs market
VIDHIING · Apr 2022: −15.0% vs market
BLUESTARCO · Feb 2025: −14.2% vs market
ECLERX · Aug 2021: −13.2% vs market
BSOFT · Jun 2021: −11.6% vs market
TEGA · Apr 2024: −11.2% vs market
BIKAJI · Apr 2025: −9.4% vs market
TIINDIA · Jun 2023: −8.4% vs market
RATNAMANI · Feb 2023: −7.1% vs market
CENTURYPLY · Aug 2022: −6.8% vs market
ELECON · Apr 2024: −5.5% vs market
PERSISTENT · Apr 2023: −3.8% vs market
ESCORTS · Apr 2020: −1.8% vs market
CARBORUNIV · Sep 2021: +0.7% vs market
KPITTECH · Aug 2023: +4.8% vs market
RADICO · May 2020: +6.1% vs market
KFINTECH · Aug 2024: +6.6% vs market
POWERINDIA · Aug 2022: +7.4% vs market
AEGISLOG · Apr 2020: +11.5% vs market
INGERRAND · Feb 2023: +14.1% vs market
BECTORFOOD · Apr 2024: +14.9% vs market
BALKRISIND · Mar 2020: +18.6% vs market
PRINCEPIPE · Mar 2021: +23.0% vs market
SUZLON · Jun 2024: +25.5% vs market
ELGIEQUIP · Jun 2022: +25.8% vs market
POLYCAB · Apr 2020: +26.9% vs market
NEWGEN · May 2024: +28.8% vs market
POLYMED · Jan 2021: +30.8% vs market
GARFIBRES · Mar 2020: +32.9% vs market
GANESHHOU · Feb 2024: +35.8% vs market
APCOTEXIND · Sep 2021: +38.2% vs market
COFORGE · May 2020: +39.6% vs market
NEULANDLAB · Apr 2024: +55.4% vs market
GRSE · May 2024: +108.7% vs market
Similar setups −6.9%All companies −0.6%← worse than the marketbetter than the market →

Each dot is one past situation (hover or tap for details) · Solid dots are the closest matches, listed below · Shaded is the middle half of all companies in the same months · 1 beyond the range shown, drawn at the edge

Similar setups' median
−6.9%
All companies' median
−0.6%
Beat the market
42% vs 49%

50 past situations · 50 companies · 29 months · 2020–2025

The closest matches

CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
ESCORTS
Producer Manufacturing
Apr 2020 18x28% −4%−22% −2%
ELECON
Producer Manufacturing
Apr 2024 54x25% +161%−3% −6%
COFORGE
Technology Services
May 2020 22x30% +11%−28% +40%
TIINDIA
Non-Energy Minerals
Jun 2023 64x32% +72%−1% −8%
KEI
Producer Manufacturing
May 2024 78x26% +105%−4% −16%
Show the other 3 matches
CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
BIKAJI
Consumer Non-Durables
Apr 2025 64x29% +31%−29% −9%
KPRMILL
Consumer Non-Durables
May 2022 42x25% +98%−17% −16%
KPITTECH
Technology Services
Aug 2023 85x30% +109%0% +5%
How reliable is this?

Matched on P/E, P/S, ROCE, operating margin, debt/equity, interest cover, revenue growth, 12-month momentum, drawdown from 12-month high, size and volatility. Closest on: 12-month momentum, drawdown from 12-month high and revenue growth. One match per company and at most 7 from any one month.

Independent periods: the matches fall in 6 distinct 12-month windows. Matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, so fewer windows means less evidence.

How this is built

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to GABRIEL INDIA LTD. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

Methodology

How historical analogs are built

Data as of 2026-11-09. Outcome pool: Jan 2020 to Oct 2025.

For every company we look at the situation it is in today (valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, 12-month price momentum, drawdown, size and volatility) and find past company-months that looked most like it. We then show what happened to those past situations over the following 12 months, measured against the ApnaFunda All index and against the base rate. It describes history. It does not predict anything.

What is compared

FeatureWeightNon-financialFinancial
P/E1yesyes
P/S1yes—
P/B1—yes
ROCE1yes—
operating margin1yes—
ROE1—yes
debt/equity0.75yes—
interest cover0.5yes—
revenue growth0.75yesyes
12-month momentum1yesyes
drawdown from 12-month high0.75yesyes
size0.75yesyes
volatility0.5yesyes

Weights were set by judgement before any outcome was looked at and are never tuned on results. Loss-making companies (negative P/E or net profit) are only matched with other loss-making companies. Banks, NBFCs and insurers are compared only with each other and use a different feature set. Every feature is converted, month by month, to its rank among companies in the same pool in that month, so a P/E of 30 in a hot market and a P/E of 22 in a cold one can match if both were equally expensive for their time. Only that month's data is used.

How closeness and the sample are defined

Distance is the weighted root-mean-square gap between the standardised features both companies have. A match needs at least 70% of the query's feature weight, a distance of at most 0.9, and 30 matches at minimum to be shown. We keep up to 50 matches with these exclusions: never the company itself, one match per company (its closest month), and at most 7 from any one calendar month so a single market episode cannot dominate.

Base rate

The base rate is the distribution of 12-month returns, relative to the market, of every eligible company-month in the same pool, with each month weighted to match the months the analogs came from. It answers: how did a random company do in these same months? Because matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, we also report the number of distinct 12-month windows behind a result, and a bootstrap that resamples months decides whether the analog median differs from the base rate at all. "Not meaningfully different" is the usual outcome and the page copy is written for it.

Limits you should know

  • One market period. The outcome pool covers 2020–2025 only (70 months), including the 2020 crash and the 2020–21 rally.
  • Survivorship. Only companies listed today are included. Delisted and bankrupt companies are missing, which flatters past outcomes, particularly for distressed-looking setups.
  • Price return only. Dividends are excluded, and the benchmark is an ApnaFunda market-cap-weighted index of the same listed companies, not an official index.
  • Reporting lag. Fundamentals are matched on an assumed 60-day lag after the quarter end, not on real announcement dates.
  • Pools: non-financial: 98,395 company-months from 2019 companies; financial: 5,659 company-months from 108 companies. 2349 companies currently have a result; the rest are suppressed because too few comparable situations exist.

Does it work? A walk-forward check

The walk-forward check has not been run for this build, so skill is shown as not yet measured.

Disclaimer

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to any company shown. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

What else looks like this?

Companies with the most similar financial profile today, regardless of industry.

Electronic Technology
70%similar
P/Evolatility
Industrial Services
59%similar
market capoperating margin
Electronic Technology
54%similar
ROCErevenue
Electronic Technology
53%similar
market capvolatility
Non-Energy Minerals
53%similar
revenuemarket cap
R R KABELRRKABEL
Producer Manufacturing
69%similar
operating marginmarket cap
Producer Manufacturing
59%similar
debt/equityrevenue
Producer Manufacturing
48%similar
market capoperating margin

Similarity is statistical, based on reported metrics; it does not imply similar business quality or future returns.

What changed?

30 events since May '22

  1. OctPriceVolume reached 12.3x its 50-day median on 2026-10-19; price +2.6% that day.
  2. SepPromoterPromoter holding rose 8.5 pts to 63.5%.
  3. SepInstitutionsFII + DII holding fell 3.6 pts over 1 quarter to 19.3%.
  4. SepPeer rankSlipped to the 2nd quartile of Producer Manufacturing on EPS growth (from the top quartile).
  5. SepPriceVolume reached 27.6x its 50-day median on 2026-09-22; price +14.0% that day.
  6. JulPriceRegained the 2025-09 peak, 4 months after the low.
  7. MayPriceVolume reached 8.5x its 50-day median on 2026-05-05; price +5.2% that day.
  8. MarPriceFell 38% from the Sep 2025 peak to the Mar 2026 low.
Show 22 earlier events
  1. DecPriceVolume reached 20.3x its 50-day median on 2025-12-18; price +13.5% that day.
  2. JulPriceVolume reached 11.8x its 50-day median on 2025-07-02; price +15.8% that day.
  3. MayPriceVolume reached 12.5x its 50-day median on 2025-05-21; price +6.0% that day.
  4. MarPriceRegained the 2024-08 peak, 2 months after the low.
  5. MarPriceVolume reached 25.3x its 50-day median on 2025-03-18; price +11.7% that day.
  6. JanPriceFell 28% from the Aug 2024 peak to the Jan 2025 low.
  7. DecPriceVolume reached 17.0x its 50-day median on 2024-12-06; price +9.4% that day.
  8. AugPriceVolume reached 5.3x its 50-day median on 2024-08-16; price -4.6% that day.
  9. JunPriceRegained the 2023-12 peak, 3 months after the low.
  10. JunPriceVolume reached 17.5x its 50-day median on 2024-06-25; price +9.4% that day.
  11. MarPriceFell 35% from the Dec 2023 peak to the Mar 2024 low.
  12. MarPriceVolume reached 11.2x its 50-day median on 2024-03-18; price +7.1% that day.
  13. NovPriceVolume reached 22.1x its 50-day median on 2023-11-15; price +11.8% that day.
  14. AugPriceVolume reached 21.9x its 50-day median on 2023-08-25; price +9.9% that day.
  15. JulPriceRegained the 2022-11 peak, 4 months after the low.
  16. MayPriceVolume reached 9.0x its 50-day median on 2023-05-11; price +2.7% that day.
  17. MarPriceFell 34% from the Nov 2022 peak to the Mar 2023 low.
  18. NovPriceVolume reached 17.5x its 50-day median on 2022-11-15; price +8.6% that day.
  19. SepPriceRegained the 2021-10 peak, 4 months after the low.
  20. AugPriceVolume reached 10.1x its 50-day median on 2022-08-04; price +5.2% that day.
  21. JunPriceVolume reached 9.4x its 50-day median on 2022-06-27; price +6.9% that day.
  22. MayPriceFell 34% from the Oct 2021 peak to the May 2022 low.

Events are generated from the data by fixed rules.
The month shown is when the change became visible in the reported figures, assuming a 60-day lag after each quarter end; it is not an announcement date.

Where price and fundamentals disagree, market-wide Rewind the whole market to any month

Monthly history30 months · 2024-06 to 2026-11
MonthP/ERevenue (TTM)ROEROCEDebt / Equity
2026-1155.6x₹5294 cr33.1%26.0%0.1x
2026-1055.8x₹5294 cr31.1%26.0%0.1x
2026-0952.6x₹5294 cr31.1%26.0%0.1x
2026-0853.7x₹5102 cr30.9%26.0%0.1x
2026-0753.8x₹5102 cr30.9%26.0%0.1x
2026-0646.2x₹5102 cr30.9%26.0%0.1x
2026-0547.7x₹4794 cr30.6%28.0%0.1x
2026-0444.5x₹4794 cr30.6%28.0%0.1x
2026-0335.9x₹4794 cr30.6%28.0%0.1x
2026-0242.6x₹4632 cr31.1%28.0%0.1x
2026-0139.9x₹4632 cr31.1%28.0%0.1x
2025-1243.1x₹4632 cr31.1%28.0%0.1x
2025-1150.5x₹4351 cr27.0%28.0%0.1x
2025-1062.5x₹4351 cr27.0%28.0%0.1x
2025-0958.0x₹4351 cr27.0%28.0%0.1x
2025-0867.6x₹4064 cr22.6%28.0%0.1x
2025-0760.8x₹4064 cr22.6%28.0%0.1x
2025-0641.2x₹4064 cr22.6%28.0%0.1x
2025-0541.2x₹3908 cr25.1%—0.1x
2025-0433.9x₹3908 cr25.1%—0.1x
2025-0336.3x₹3908 cr25.1%—0.1x
2025-0231.6x₹3706 cr23.0%—0.1x
2025-0131.4x₹3706 cr23.0%—0.1x
2024-1232.3x₹3706 cr23.0%—0.1x
2024-1132.8x₹3543 cr21.2%—0.1x
2024-1033.7x₹3543 cr21.2%—0.1x
2024-0938.1x₹3543 cr21.2%—0.1x
2024-0844.1x₹3403 cr19.5%—0.1x
2024-0740.1x₹3403 cr19.5%—0.1x
2024-0638.9x₹3403 cr19.5%—0.1x

Methodology and data notes

Methodology

Methodology and data notes

All figures come from public exchange prices and screener.in financial statements. Quarterly and annual results are shown from 60 days after the period end, so a month never uses a result before it would plausibly have been published. Statements are the latest versions, which may include later restatements.

Sector medians, percentiles and indices use today's listed companies in the sector (survivorship bias). Prices are adjusted for splits and bonus issues; around a corporate action the fundamentals may lag the price by up to a month, and affected sections are hidden.

The return decomposition uses price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count. The reverse DCF uses a fixed 12% cost of equity, a 10-year horizon and a 15x terminal P/E, and is an illustration only. Events, flags and twins follow fixed rules and thresholds described next to each section.

Feedback