अApnaFunda

BIKAJI FOODS INT LIMITED (BIKAJI)

Consumer Non-Durables · Food: Specialty/Candy · figures to Nov '26

Quality scoreHow the business itself ranks against its sector peers on profitability, 3-year growth and leverage. 50 is the middle of the sector.71 / 100
Profitability 64Growth 74Balance sheet 73
Momentum scoreHow strong the recent trend is: 3-month price change, 12-month improvement in earnings and the rise in FII + DII holding, among companies above ₹500 cr.51 / 100
Price 9Earnings 56FII/DII 89

Passes these screensDebt-light & profitableConsistent compounders

Share price

Closing priceAdjusted for splits and bonus issues.

₹479.85 latest close · −27.5% over the last 90 sessions

₹500₹600Jul 3Jul 29Aug 24Sep 17Oct 14Nov 9 ₹500₹600Jul 3Sep 4Nov 9

₹479.85 month-end · −33.1% over 12 months

₹500₹600₹700Nov '25Jan '26Apr '26Jun '26Sep '26Nov '26 ₹500₹600₹700Nov '25May '26Nov '26

₹479.85 month-end · −14.0% over 3 years

₹600₹800Nov '23Jun '24Jan '25Sep '25Apr '26Nov '26 ₹600₹800Nov '23May '25Nov '26

₹479.85 month-end · +15.2% since Nov '22

₹400₹600₹800Nov '22Sep '23Jun '24Apr '25Jan '26Nov '26 ₹400₹600₹800Nov '22Nov '24Nov '26

52-week range ₹446.10 to ₹768.50 · 1-year volatility 25.7%

Was the rally earned?

-33%share price, 1 yearLower P/E held it back

Earnings helped, the multiple did not.

  • Per-share earnings added 20 points, but investors now pay less per rupee of profit (P/E 88.9x to 46.5x), which took 53 points back.
  • The share count rose 3%.
Net profit growth: +23 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+23 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: −53 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−53 ptsP/E changeShare count change: −3 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−3 ptsShare count changeShare price: −33%−33%Share priceNet profit growth: +23 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+23ProfitP/E change: −53 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−53P/EShare count change: −3 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−3SharesShare price: −33%−33%Share price
Net profit growth+23 ptsNet profit rose about 32%, which lifts the price.
P/E change-53 ptsThe P/E fell from 88.9x to 46.5x, which lowers the price.
Share count change-3 ptsShare count rose 3%, which lowers the price.
-14%share price, 3 yearsLower P/E held it back

Earnings helped, the multiple did not.

  • Per-share earnings added 58 points, but investors now pay less per rupee of profit (P/E 101.5x to 46.5x), which took 72 points back.
  • The share count barely moved.
Net profit growth: +60 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+60 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: −72 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−72 ptsP/E changeShare count change: −1 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−1 ptsShare count changeShare price: −14%−14%Share priceNet profit growth: +60 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+60ProfitP/E change: −72 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−72P/EShare count change: −1 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−1SharesShare price: −14%−14%Share price
Net profit growth+60 ptsNet profit rose about 90%, which lifts the price.
P/E change-72 ptsThe P/E fell from 101.5x to 46.5x, which lowers the price.
Share count change-1 ptsShare count was little changed. More shares would count against the price.
What do "pts" mean?

"pts" are percentage points of the share price return. The parts add up to the total shown for each period. Because price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count, higher profit pushes the price up, a higher P/E pushes it up, and more shares push it down.

Example: if the price rose 34% and profit growth accounts for +58 pts while a lower P/E accounts for -24 pts, then 58 - 24 = 34. The +58 is not the profit growth rate itself: it is the part of the price move that profit growth explains.

Not shown for 5 years: earnings were negative at one end, or there is not enough history.

Net profit is trailing twelve months as reported with a 60-day lag.

Compare this with BRITANNIA INDUSTRIES

How rough has the ride been?

Maximum drawdown-53.9%not yet recovered
1-year volatility25.7%annualised
Beta vs sector index0.693-year daily, correlation 0.29
Volume spikes8last 90 sessions, 5x the 50-day median

Drawdown from peak

0%−20%−40%2023202420252026−53.9% 0%−20%−40%202420252026−53.9%
Largest drawdowns

-53.9% (2024-09 peak to 2026-10 low, not yet recovered)

-22.2% (2023-01 peak to 2023-03 low, recovered 2023-07)

-19.4% (2022-11 peak to 2022-12 low, recovered 2022-12)

Most recent volume spikes

2026-11-05: 7.3x the 50-day median, price +4.1% that day

2026-10-06: 8.6x the 50-day median, price -1.2% that day

2026-10-01: 5.5x the 50-day median, price -3.4% that day

Beta is the slope of daily returns against a market-cap-weighted index of the sector's other listed companies, built from today's constituents (so it excludes companies no longer listed).

Is it expensive against its own past and its peers?

46.5xP/E todayNear its historic low
Against its own history4th percentile
CheapestMedian 86.0xDearest

Usual range 60.5x to 117.0x since 2022-11.

Against Consumer Non-Durables46.5x vs 26.8x
This company
46.5x
Sector median
26.8x

74% above the Consumer Non-Durables median.

24.1x62.7x101.3x139.8xNov '22Sep '23Jul '24May '25Mar '26Nov '2624.1x62.7x101.3x139.8xNov '22Mar '24Jul '25Nov '26
P/E (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianConsumer Non-Durables median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/B (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianConsumer Non-Durables median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/S (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianConsumer Non-Durables median
How to read this

Shaded band: 10th to 90th percentile of the company's own P/E history; dotted line: its median; orange line: sector median (companies with a positive multiple, at least 5 in the sector).

Sector figures are built from today's listed companies, so they exclude companies that are no longer listed.

All terms explained in the glossary →

How Consumer Non-Durables is valued

Where does it rank among Consumer Non-Durables peers?

Each cell is the company's percentile rank among its Consumer Non-Durables peers (non-financial companies) that month.
Darker is better-ranked.
Rows marked ↓ are inverted (lower debt, shorter cash cycle and a lower P/E rank higher).

Where it ranks today

  • ROCE75th▲ 6 pts vs a year ago
  • Op. margin54th▼ 13 pts vs a year ago
  • Revenue growth65th▲ 10 pts vs a year ago
  • EPS growth70th▲ 53 pts vs a year ago
  • Debt/equity ↓61stflat vs a year ago
  • Cash cycle ↓83rdflat vs a year ago
  • P/E ↓28th▲ 15 pts vs a year ago
  • 12M momentum18th▼ 36 pts vs a year ago

Rank history

ROCE
Op. margin
Revenue growth
EPS growth
Debt/equity ↓
Cash cycle ↓
P/E ↓
12M momentum
Dec '21Jul '22Jan '23Jul '23Jan '24Jul '24Jan '25Jul '25Jan '26Jul '26Nov '26
Lower rank Higher rank Not enough data

Percentiles use today's listed companies in the sector and need at least 5 peers with a value; grey cells have too few.
ROE is computed from net profit and book value where the source does not report it.

The Consumer Non-Durables sector page Watch it move against Consumer Non-Durables in the Observatory

What is the price implying?

~29%annual earnings growth implied by the priceBelow delivered growth

At normalised P/E (five-year average earnings) of 64.3x, a holder earning 12%/yr needs earnings to grow about 29.0%/yr for 10 years, then trade at 15x.

Delivered32.9%/yrEPS, last 7 fiscal years · 3-yr avg to 3-yr avg
Gap−3.9 ptsimplied minus delivered
Rank609thmost demanding of 856

Over time

Implied growth by month (solid) and delivered growth (dashed).

0%22%44% Nov 2022Nov 2026 0%22%44% Nov 2022Nov 2026

Change the assumptions

Exit P/E / return11%12%13%
12x30.6%31.8%33.0%
15x27.8%29.0%30.1%
20x24.3%25.4%26.5%

Drag a slider to test other assumptions

Implied: 29.0%/yr

“Implied growth” is what the current price would require under our stated assumptions, not what we expect. How this is calculated and the market-wide lists.

What prices imply across Consumer Non-Durables The market-wide Expectations lists

Key figures

Share Priceclose 9 Nov
₹479.85
P/E
46.5x
ROCE
20.0%
Market Cap
₹12041 cr
Revenue (TTM)
₹3075 cr
P/S
3.9x
P/B
7.5x
ROE
16.1%
Operating Margin
13.0%
Debt / Equity
0.2x
Promoter Holding
73.9%
12M Momentum
-33.1%

52-week range

₹446.10₹768.50
10% of the way from its 52-week low to its high

Price risk

1Y volatility
25.7%
Beta vs sector
1-year daily
0.60

Balance sheet & cash

Interest cover
operating profit ÷ interest
20.3x
Cash from profit, 3Y
operating cash flow ÷ net profit
1.04x
Share count, 1Y
unchanged

Are profits backed by cash?

7 of 7checks within rangeAll clear
Other income reliance14%Within range

Other income as a share of pre-tax profit (trailing twelve months): 14.4%. Bands: below 15%, 15% to 35%, above 35%.

Tax rate26%Within range

Median quarterly effective tax rate over about 2.5 years: 26.0%. Bands: 15% to 35%, 5% to 15% or 35% to 50%, outside 5% to 50%.

Cash conversion1.04xWithin range

Operating cash flow divided by net profit over the last three fiscal years: 1.04x (cash from operations ₹742 cr, net profit ₹711 cr). Bands: 0.8x and above, 0.5x to 0.8x, below 0.5x.

Free cash flow4 of 5 yrsWithin range

Fiscal years with positive free cash flow in the last 5: 4. Bands: at least 80% of years, 40% to 80%, below 40%.

Receivable days vs history-2 daysWithin range

Debtor days are below the median of the previous three fiscal years by 2 days (13 vs 15). Bands: under 15 days, 15 to 45, over 45.

Capital work in progress15% of fixed assetsWithin range

Capital work-in-progress is 15% of fixed assets. Bands: not rising or up to 30%; rising for three years and above 30%; rising and above 60%.

Payable days0 days / 2 yrsWithin range

Days payable changed by 0 over two years. Bands: rise of up to 30 days; more than 30 days.

Tap a check to see how it is measured

How to read this

Each check is a named rule with fixed thresholds, not a score. Annual statements are the latest restated figures, so a past year may differ from what was originally reported.

All terms explained in the glossary →

Who has been buying and selling?

  • Over 3 years, DIIs added 4.0 pts; FIIs trimmed 2.4 pts; promoters trimmed 1.3 pts.
  • The number of shareholders rose from 85,411 to 1.1 lakh (+30%) between Sep 2023 and Jun 2026.

Holdings, Jun '26

How each group changed

GroupSep '23Jun '26Change
Promoters75.2%73.9%-1.3 pts
FIIs7.0%4.6%-2.4 pts
DIIs13.6%17.5%+4.0 pts
Public and others4.2%4.0%-0.2 pts

Number of shareholders

1.1 lakhshareholders+30% since Sep '23
85k1.0L1.2L1.4L Sep '23Jun '24Mar '25Dec '25Jun '26
Sep '23: 85,411
Dec '23: 86,930
Mar '24: 85,927
Jun '24: 92,097
Sep '24: 1.1 lakh
Dec '24: 1.4 lakh
Mar '25: 1.4 lakh
Jun '25: 1.3 lakh
Sep '25: 1.3 lakh
Dec '25: 1.2 lakh
Mar '26: 1.1 lakh
Jun '26: 1.1 lakh
85k1.0L1.2L1.4L Sep '23Sep '24Sep '25Jun '26
Sep '23: 85,411
Dec '23: 86,930
Mar '24: 85,927
Jun '24: 92,097
Sep '24: 1.1 lakh
Dec '24: 1.4 lakh
Mar '25: 1.4 lakh
Jun '25: 1.3 lakh
Sep '25: 1.3 lakh
Dec '25: 1.2 lakh
Mar '26: 1.1 lakh
Jun '26: 1.1 lakh

Quarterly shareholding as reported, labelled by the quarter it covers (it becomes visible about two months later).
Shareholder counts are only available for recent quarters.

This quarter's smart-money board

What happened next to similar setups

−14.7%typical 12-month return vs the marketBelow the base rate
  • We found 50 past situations where a non-financial company looked like BIKAJI FOODS INT LIMITED today on valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, price momentum, size and volatility.
  • Over the following 12 months the middle half of them returned −24% to +10% vs the market, against −2% for all non-financial companies in the same months.
  • The analogs' median sat below that base rate (gap −12.3%, 80% range −18.8% to −5.8%), but the matches cluster in only 6 distinct 12-month windows.

Where the 50 outcomes landed

−50%0%+50%+100%
TATVA · Apr 2023: −52.1% vs market
ATUL · Apr 2023: −41.1% vs market
KANSAINER · Jun 2021: −35.6% vs market
BHARATRAS · Apr 2023: −34.3% vs market
EPL · Mar 2021: −33.7% vs market
HAPPSTMNDS · Nov 2024: −33.6% vs market
RAMCOCEM · May 2021: −33.1% vs market
RELAXO · Jan 2025: −32.9% vs market
ORIENTELEC · Dec 2022: −32.2% vs market
SFL · Jan 2023: −31.0% vs market
GALAXYSURF · May 2023: −30.7% vs market
GRINDWELL · Aug 2024: −30.5% vs market
KAJARIACER · Dec 2023: −24.3% vs market
RALLIS · Mar 2021: −23.8% vs market
CROMPTON · Jul 2025: −23.5% vs market
JYOTHYLAB · Nov 2020: −22.3% vs market
NATCOPHARM · Mar 2022: −21.5% vs market
ASTRAL · Dec 2024: −20.4% vs market
WHIRLPOOL · May 2022: −20.4% vs market
GARFIBRES · Aug 2023: −18.5% vs market
BECTORFOOD · Sep 2025: −18.3% vs market
SRF · Jul 2023: −17.4% vs market
TATATECH · Apr 2025: −17.2% vs market
TTKPRESTIG · Jul 2023: −17.1% vs market
VGUARD · Jul 2021: −15.6% vs market
EMAMILTD · May 2022: −13.8% vs market
SYNGENE · Jun 2024: −11.9% vs market
SUNDRMFAST · Feb 2024: −9.1% vs market
DEEPAKNTR · Aug 2025: −9.1% vs market
SYMPHONY · Jul 2023: −7.1% vs market
DABUR · Dec 2024: −5.9% vs market
ENDURANCE · Feb 2022: −4.3% vs market
ALKEM · Feb 2021: +0.3% vs market
RATNAMANI · Oct 2025: +1.1% vs market
PRINCEPIPE · Sep 2022: +4.1% vs market
BERGEPAINT · Apr 2024: +5.3% vs market
CENTURYPLY · Jul 2024: +9.8% vs market
BLUESTARCO · Jul 2020: +10.6% vs market
HAVELLS · Jan 2024: +11.9% vs market
UBL · Oct 2020: +12.2% vs market
CARBORUNIV · Aug 2025: +12.7% vs market
CUMMINSIND · May 2020: +20.1% vs market
THERMAX · Jul 2020: +21.5% vs market
AFFLE · Apr 2024: +39.2% vs market
POLYMED · Jul 2022: +47.6% vs market
CERA · Feb 2022: +52.1% vs market
SOLARINDS · Dec 2020: +64.0% vs market
KIMS · May 2024: +78.2% vs market
ELGIEQUIP · May 2020: +80.8% vs market
FINEORG · Aug 2021: +102.9% vs market
Similar setups −14.7%All companies −2.4%← worse than the marketbetter than the market →

Each dot is one past situation (hover or tap for details) · Solid dots are the closest matches, listed below · Shaded is the middle half of all companies in the same months · 2 beyond the range shown, drawn at the edge

Similar setups' median
−14.7%
All companies' median
−2.4%
Beat the market
36% vs 47%

50 past situations · 50 companies · 38 months · 2020–2025

The closest matches

CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
KAJARIACER
Producer Manufacturing
Dec 2023 60x20% +12%−13% −24%
BECTORFOOD
Consumer Non-Durables
Sep 2025 56x18% −34%−36% −18%
SUNDRMFAST
Producer Manufacturing
Feb 2024 46x19% +9%−19% −9%
SFL
Process Industries
Jan 2023 55x18% −25%−38% −31%
GARFIBRES
Producer Manufacturing
Aug 2023 38x21% −8%−14% −19%
Show the other 3 matches
CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
CARBORUNIV
Process Industries
Aug 2025 59x16% −40%−41% +13%
GALAXYSURF
Consumer Non-Durables
May 2023 33x19% −14%−27% −31%
ASTRAL
Producer Manufacturing
Dec 2024 85x23% −13%−32% −20%
How reliable is this?

Matched on P/E, P/S, ROCE, operating margin, debt/equity, interest cover, revenue growth, 12-month momentum, drawdown from 12-month high, size and volatility. Closest on: 12-month momentum, drawdown from 12-month high and P/S. One match per company and at most 7 from any one month.

Independent periods: the matches fall in 6 distinct 12-month windows. Matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, so fewer windows means less evidence.

How this is built

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to BIKAJI FOODS INT LIMITED. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

Methodology

How historical analogs are built

Data as of 2026-11-09. Outcome pool: Jan 2020 to Oct 2025.

For every company we look at the situation it is in today (valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, 12-month price momentum, drawdown, size and volatility) and find past company-months that looked most like it. We then show what happened to those past situations over the following 12 months, measured against the ApnaFunda All index and against the base rate. It describes history. It does not predict anything.

What is compared

FeatureWeightNon-financialFinancial
P/E1yesyes
P/S1yes—
P/B1—yes
ROCE1yes—
operating margin1yes—
ROE1—yes
debt/equity0.75yes—
interest cover0.5yes—
revenue growth0.75yesyes
12-month momentum1yesyes
drawdown from 12-month high0.75yesyes
size0.75yesyes
volatility0.5yesyes

Weights were set by judgement before any outcome was looked at and are never tuned on results. Loss-making companies (negative P/E or net profit) are only matched with other loss-making companies. Banks, NBFCs and insurers are compared only with each other and use a different feature set. Every feature is converted, month by month, to its rank among companies in the same pool in that month, so a P/E of 30 in a hot market and a P/E of 22 in a cold one can match if both were equally expensive for their time. Only that month's data is used.

How closeness and the sample are defined

Distance is the weighted root-mean-square gap between the standardised features both companies have. A match needs at least 70% of the query's feature weight, a distance of at most 0.9, and 30 matches at minimum to be shown. We keep up to 50 matches with these exclusions: never the company itself, one match per company (its closest month), and at most 7 from any one calendar month so a single market episode cannot dominate.

Base rate

The base rate is the distribution of 12-month returns, relative to the market, of every eligible company-month in the same pool, with each month weighted to match the months the analogs came from. It answers: how did a random company do in these same months? Because matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, we also report the number of distinct 12-month windows behind a result, and a bootstrap that resamples months decides whether the analog median differs from the base rate at all. "Not meaningfully different" is the usual outcome and the page copy is written for it.

Limits you should know

  • One market period. The outcome pool covers 2020–2025 only (70 months), including the 2020 crash and the 2020–21 rally.
  • Survivorship. Only companies listed today are included. Delisted and bankrupt companies are missing, which flatters past outcomes, particularly for distressed-looking setups.
  • Price return only. Dividends are excluded, and the benchmark is an ApnaFunda market-cap-weighted index of the same listed companies, not an official index.
  • Reporting lag. Fundamentals are matched on an assumed 60-day lag after the quarter end, not on real announcement dates.
  • Pools: non-financial: 98,395 company-months from 2019 companies; financial: 5,659 company-months from 108 companies. 2349 companies currently have a result; the rest are suppressed because too few comparable situations exist.

Does it work? A walk-forward check

The walk-forward check has not been run for this build, so skill is shown as not yet measured.

Disclaimer

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to any company shown. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

What else looks like this?

Companies with the most similar financial profile today, regardless of industry.

Producer Manufacturing
69%similar
debt/equityEPS growth
Producer Manufacturing
67%similar
market capvolatility
Health Technology
65%similar
volatilityEPS growth
Health Technology
65%similar
ROCEmarket cap
Electronic Technology
63%similar
P/Eoperating margin
Consumer Non-Durables
52%similar
volatilitypromoter holding
Consumer Non-Durables
51%similar
P/Evolatility
Consumer Non-Durables
49%similar
revenue growthEPS growth

Similarity is statistical, based on reported metrics; it does not imply similar business quality or future returns.

What changed?

28 events since Jun '23

  1. OctPriceFell 54% from the Sep 2024 peak to the Oct 2026 low.
  2. OctPriceVolume reached 8.6x its 50-day median on 2026-10-06; price -1.2% that day.
  3. SepPriceVolume reached 52.1x its 50-day median on 2026-09-23; price +6.8% that day.
  4. AugPeer rankMoved into the top quartile of Consumer Non-Durables on ROCE (from the 2nd quartile).
  5. JunResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned positive.
  6. JunPeer rankSlipped to the 3rd quartile of Consumer Non-Durables on operating margin (from the 2nd quartile).
  7. JunPriceVolume reached 5.8x its 50-day median on 2026-06-15; price -2.1% that day.
  8. MarValuationP/E fell below the 10th percentile of its own history to date (63.3x).
Show 20 earlier events
  1. MarPeer rankMoved into the 3rd quartile of Consumer Non-Durables on EPS growth (from the bottom quartile).
  2. JanPriceVolume reached 8.9x its 50-day median on 2026-01-28; price +2.2% that day.
  3. DecPriceVolume reached 5.1x its 50-day median on 2025-12-02; price -2.1% that day.
  4. SepResultsRevenue (TTM) reached a new high of ₹2,700 cr.
  5. JulPriceVolume reached 9.8x its 50-day median on 2025-07-16; price +3.4% that day.
  6. JunResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned negative.
  7. JunPeer rankSlipped to the 2nd quartile of Consumer Non-Durables on ROCE (from the top quartile).
  8. MarPeer rankSlipped to the 3rd quartile of Consumer Non-Durables on operating margin (from the 2nd quartile).
  9. FebPriceVolume reached 13.0x its 50-day median on 2025-02-07; price -10.2% that day.
  10. NovValuationP/E fell below the 10th percentile of its own history to date (71.2x).
  11. SepPeer rankSlipped to the 2nd quartile of Consumer Non-Durables on operating margin (from the top quartile).
  12. AugPriceVolume reached 11.7x its 50-day median on 2024-08-02; price +3.4% that day.
  13. JunResultsRevenue (TTM) reached a new high of ₹2,329 cr.
  14. JunPeer rankMoved into the top quartile of Consumer Non-Durables on ROCE (from the 2nd quartile).
  15. MayPriceVolume reached 23.6x its 50-day median on 2024-05-31; price +9.3% that day.
  16. FebPriceVolume reached 5.2x its 50-day median on 2024-02-14; price -1.2% that day.
  17. NovPriceVolume reached 7.7x its 50-day median on 2023-11-07; price +4.1% that day.
  18. JulPriceVolume reached 15.5x its 50-day median on 2023-07-19; price +5.2% that day.
  19. JunPeer rankMoved into the 2nd quartile of Consumer Non-Durables on ROCE (from the 3rd quartile).
  20. JunPriceVolume reached 40.1x its 50-day median on 2023-06-28; price -1.2% that day.

Events are generated from the data by fixed rules.
The month shown is when the change became visible in the reported figures, assuming a 60-day lag after each quarter end; it is not an announcement date.

Where price and fundamentals disagree, market-wide Rewind the whole market to any month

Monthly history49 months · 2022-11 to 2026-11
MonthP/ERevenue (TTM)ROEROCEDebt / Equity
2026-1146.5x₹3075 cr16.1%20.0%0.2x
2026-1043.8x₹3075 cr15.9%20.0%0.2x
2026-0950.6x₹3075 cr15.9%20.0%0.2x
2026-0860.7x₹2994 cr15.9%20.0%0.2x
2026-0762.3x₹2994 cr15.9%20.0%0.2x
2026-0663.2x₹2994 cr15.9%20.0%0.2x
2026-0566.1x₹2884 cr17.3%18.0%0.2x
2026-0468.8x₹2884 cr17.3%18.0%0.2x
2026-0363.3x₹2884 cr17.3%18.0%0.2x
2026-0275.2x₹2809 cr14.8%18.0%0.2x
2026-0177.5x₹2809 cr14.8%18.0%0.2x
2025-1288.3x₹2809 cr14.8%18.0%0.2x
2025-1188.9x₹2700 cr14.2%18.0%0.2x
2025-1090.5x₹2700 cr14.2%18.0%0.2x
2025-0992.2x₹2700 cr14.2%18.0%0.2x
2025-0898.7x₹2619 cr14.1%18.0%0.2x
2025-0793.6x₹2619 cr14.1%18.0%0.2x
2025-0692.4x₹2619 cr14.1%18.0%0.2x
2025-0570.4x₹2622 cr22.2%29.0%0.1x
2025-0464.4x₹2622 cr22.2%29.0%0.1x
2025-0360.8x₹2622 cr22.2%29.0%0.1x
2025-0254.7x₹2531 cr23.7%29.0%0.1x
2025-0159.6x₹2531 cr23.7%29.0%0.1x
2024-1267.3x₹2531 cr23.7%29.0%0.1x
2024-1171.2x₹2419 cr23.0%29.0%0.1x
2024-1075.3x₹2419 cr23.0%29.0%0.1x
2024-0981.7x₹2419 cr23.0%29.0%0.1x
2024-0877.7x₹2329 cr21.6%29.0%0.1x
2024-0767.3x₹2329 cr21.6%29.0%0.1x
2024-0667.4x₹2329 cr21.6%29.0%0.1x
2024-05108.0x₹1966 cr14.2%18.0%0.2x
2024-0496.9x₹1966 cr14.2%18.0%0.2x
2024-0389.2x₹1966 cr14.2%18.0%0.2x
2024-0294.9x₹1966 cr14.2%18.0%0.2x
2024-01107.6x₹1966 cr14.2%18.0%0.2x
2023-1299.3x₹1966 cr14.2%18.0%0.2x
2023-11101.5x₹1966 cr14.2%18.0%0.2x
2023-1086.0x₹1966 cr14.2%18.0%0.2x
2023-0988.2x₹1966 cr14.2%18.0%0.2x
2023-0890.6x₹1966 cr14.2%18.0%0.2x
2023-0788.2x₹1966 cr14.2%18.0%0.2x
2023-0676.0x₹1966 cr14.2%18.0%0.2x
2023-05122.4x₹1611 cr9.3%13.0%0.2x
2023-04120.3x₹1611 cr9.3%13.0%0.2x
2023-03116.2x₹1611 cr9.3%13.0%0.2x
2023-02114.5x₹1611 cr9.3%13.0%0.2x
2023-01125.9x₹1611 cr9.3%13.0%0.2x
2022-12139.8x₹1611 cr9.3%13.0%0.2x
2022-11133.5x₹1611 cr9.3%13.0%0.2x

Methodology and data notes

Methodology

Methodology and data notes

All figures come from public exchange prices and screener.in financial statements. Quarterly and annual results are shown from 60 days after the period end, so a month never uses a result before it would plausibly have been published. Statements are the latest versions, which may include later restatements.

Sector medians, percentiles and indices use today's listed companies in the sector (survivorship bias). Prices are adjusted for splits and bonus issues; around a corporate action the fundamentals may lag the price by up to a month, and affected sections are hidden.

The return decomposition uses price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count. The reverse DCF uses a fixed 12% cost of equity, a 10-year horizon and a 15x terminal P/E, and is an illustration only. Events, flags and twins follow fixed rules and thresholds described next to each section.

Feedback