अApnaFunda

SHEELA FOAM LIMITED (SFL)

Process Industries · Industrial Specialties · figures to Nov '26

Quality scoreHow the business itself ranks against its sector peers on profitability, 3-year growth and leverage. 50 is the middle of the sector.54 / 100
Profitability 37Growth 58Balance sheet 68
Momentum scoreHow strong the recent trend is: 3-month price change, 12-month improvement in earnings and the rise in FII + DII holding, among companies above ₹500 cr.37 / 100
Price 19Earnings 81FII/DII 10

Share price

Closing priceAdjusted for splits and bonus issues.

₹557.75 latest close · −27.2% over the last 90 sessions

₹500₹600₹700₹800Jul 3Jul 29Aug 24Sep 17Oct 14Nov 9 ₹500₹600₹700₹800Jul 3Sep 4Nov 9

₹557.75 month-end · −7.0% over 12 months

₹500₹600₹700₹800Nov '25Jan '26Apr '26Jun '26Sep '26Nov '26 ₹500₹600₹700₹800Nov '25May '26Nov '26

₹557.75 month-end · −51.4% over 3 years

₹500₹750₹1,000₹1,250Nov '23Jun '24Jan '25Sep '25Apr '26Nov '26 ₹500₹750₹1,000₹1,250Nov '23May '25Nov '26

₹557.75 month-end · −13.6% since Jan '19

₹500₹1,000₹1,500Jan '19Aug '20Mar '22Sep '23Apr '25Nov '26 ₹500₹1,000₹1,500Jan '19Dec '22Nov '26

52-week range ₹456.80 to ₹832.45 · 1-year volatility 39.9%

Was the rally earned?

-7%share price, 1 yearLower P/E held it back

Earnings helped, the multiple did not.

  • Per-share earnings added 129 points, but investors now pay less per rupee of profit (P/E 116.1x to 28.3x), which took 136 points back.
  • The share count barely moved.
Net profit growth: +128 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+128 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: −136 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−136 ptsP/E changeShare count change: +1 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.+1 ptsShare count changeShare price: −7%−7%Share priceNet profit growth: +128 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+128ProfitP/E change: −136 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−136P/EShare count change: +1 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.+1SharesShare price: −7%−7%Share price
Net profit growth+128 ptsNet profit rose about 277%, which lifts the price.
P/E change-136 ptsThe P/E fell from 116.1x to 28.3x, which lowers the price.
Share count change+1 ptsShare count was little changed. More shares would count against the price.
-51%share price, 3 yearsMultiple-driven

Mostly the multiple.

  • Most of the fall came from investors paying a lower multiple (P/E 56.3x to 28.3x); per-share earnings took off 2 points.
  • The share count rose 11%.
Net profit growth: +5 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+5 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: −49 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−49 ptsP/E changeShare count change: −7 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−7 ptsShare count changeShare price: −51%−51%Share priceNet profit growth: +5 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+5ProfitP/E change: −49 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−49P/EShare count change: −7 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−7SharesShare price: −51%−51%Share price
Net profit growth+5 ptsNet profit rose about 7%, which lifts the price.
P/E change-49 ptsThe P/E fell from 56.3x to 28.3x, which lowers the price.
Share count change-7 ptsShare count rose 11%, which lowers the price.
-66%share price, 5 yearsMultiple-driven

Mostly the multiple.

  • Most of the fall came from investors paying a lower multiple (P/E 66.9x to 28.3x); per-share earnings took off 13 points.
  • The share count rose 11%.
Net profit growth: −7 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).−7 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: −53 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−53 ptsP/E changeShare count change: −6 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−6 ptsShare count changeShare price: −66%−66%Share priceNet profit growth: −7 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).−7ProfitP/E change: −53 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−53P/EShare count change: −6 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−6SharesShare price: −66%−66%Share price
Net profit growth-7 ptsNet profit fell about 10%, which lowers the price.
P/E change-53 ptsThe P/E fell from 66.9x to 28.3x, which lowers the price.
Share count change-6 ptsShare count rose 11%, which lowers the price.
What do "pts" mean?

"pts" are percentage points of the share price return. The parts add up to the total shown for each period. Because price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count, higher profit pushes the price up, a higher P/E pushes it up, and more shares push it down.

Example: if the price rose 34% and profit growth accounts for +58 pts while a lower P/E accounts for -24 pts, then 58 - 24 = 34. The +58 is not the profit growth rate itself: it is the part of the price move that profit growth explains.

Net profit is trailing twelve months as reported with a 60-day lag.

Compare this with ASIAN PAINTS INDIA

How rough has the ride been?

Maximum drawdown-76.4%not yet recovered
1-year volatility39.9%annualised
Beta vs sector index0.823-year daily, correlation 0.44
Volume spikes6last 90 sessions, 5x the 50-day median

Drawdown from peak

0%−25%−50%−75%2020202120222023202420252026−75.0% 0%−25%−50%−75%2020202220242026−75.0%
Largest drawdowns

-76.4% (2022-04 peak to 2026-03 low, not yet recovered)

-29.5% (2020-02 peak to 2020-03 low, recovered 2020-12)

-23.7% (2019-01 peak to 2019-08 low, recovered 2020-01)

Most recent volume spikes

2026-11-06: 9.4x the 50-day median, price +0.1% that day

2026-11-03: 6.7x the 50-day median, price -7.4% that day

2026-09-08: 18.7x the 50-day median, price +5.2% that day

Beta is the slope of daily returns against a market-cap-weighted index of the sector's other listed companies, built from today's constituents (so it excludes companies no longer listed).

Is it expensive against its own past and its peers?

28.3xP/E todayNear its historic low
Against its own history2nd percentile
CheapestMedian 52.0xDearest

Usual range 43.6x to 74.0x since 2019-01.

Against Process Industries28.3x vs 18.1x
This company
28.3x
Sector median
18.1x

57% above the Process Industries median.

6.8x50.6x94.4x138.2xJan '19Aug '20Mar '22Oct '23May '25Nov '266.8x50.6x94.4x138.2xJan '19Sep '21May '24Nov '26
P/E (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianProcess Industries median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/B (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianProcess Industries median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/S (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianProcess Industries median
How to read this

Shaded band: 10th to 90th percentile of the company's own P/E history; dotted line: its median; orange line: sector median (companies with a positive multiple, at least 5 in the sector).

Sector figures are built from today's listed companies, so they exclude companies that are no longer listed.

All terms explained in the glossary →

How Process Industries is valued

Where does it rank among Process Industries peers?

Each cell is the company's percentile rank among its Process Industries peers (non-financial companies) that month.
Darker is better-ranked.
Rows marked ↓ are inverted (lower debt, shorter cash cycle and a lower P/E rank higher).

Where it ranks today

  • ROCE26th▲ 9 pts vs a year ago
  • Op. margin48th▲ 4 pts vs a year ago
  • Revenue growth71st▲ 14 pts vs a year ago
  • EPS growth97th▲ 88 pts vs a year ago
  • Debt/equity ↓58th▲ 14 pts vs a year ago
  • Cash cycle ↓86thflat vs a year ago
  • P/E ↓30th▲ 26 pts vs a year ago
  • 12M momentum53rd▲ 15 pts vs a year ago

Rank history

ROCE
Op. margin
Revenue growth
EPS growth
Debt/equity ↓
Cash cycle ↓
P/E ↓
12M momentum
Dec '21Jul '22Jan '23Jul '23Jan '24Jul '24Jan '25Jul '25Jan '26Jul '26Nov '26
Lower rank Higher rank Not enough data

Percentiles use today's listed companies in the sector and need at least 5 peers with a value; grey cells have too few.
ROE is computed from net profit and book value where the source does not report it.

The Process Industries sector page Watch it move against Process Industries in the Observatory

What is the price implying?

~22%annual earnings growth implied by the priceAbove delivered growth

At normalised P/E (five-year average earnings) of 36.0x, a holder earning 12%/yr needs earnings to grow about 22.2%/yr for 10 years, then trade at 15x.

Delivered−0.2%/yrEPS, last 10 fiscal years · 3-yr avg to 3-yr avg
Gap+22.5 ptsimplied minus delivered
Rank114thmost demanding of 856

Over time

Implied growth by month (solid) and delivered growth (dashed).

-0%18%36% Jan 2019Nov 2026 -0%18%36% Jan 2019Nov 2026

Change the assumptions

Exit P/E / return11%12%13%
12x23.9%25.0%26.1%
15x21.1%22.2%23.3%
20x17.7%18.8%19.8%

Drag a slider to test other assumptions

Implied: 22.2%/yr

Looking back

  • Jan 2020Price implied 30%/yr; EPS has since grown 1%/yr (7.0 yrs)
  • Jan 2021Price implied 31%/yr; EPS has since grown −5%/yr (6.0 yrs)
  • Jan 2022Price implied 35%/yr; EPS has since grown −10%/yr (5.0 yrs)

Past comparisons cover only companies listed today (survivorship bias) and say nothing about future outcomes.

“Implied growth” is what the current price would require under our stated assumptions, not what we expect. How this is calculated and the market-wide lists.

What prices imply across Process Industries The market-wide Expectations lists

Key figures

Share Priceclose 9 Nov
₹557.75
P/E
28.3x
ROCE
6.0%
Market Cap
₹6086 cr
Revenue (TTM)
₹4031 cr
P/S
1.5x
P/B
1.9x
ROE
6.6%
Operating Margin
11.0%
Debt / Equity
0.3x
Promoter Holding
65.4%
12M Momentum
-7.0%

52-week range

₹456.80₹832.45
27% of the way from its 52-week low to its high

Price risk

1Y volatility
39.9%
Beta vs sector
1-year daily
1.01

Balance sheet & cash

Interest cover
operating profit ÷ interest
4.0x
Cash from profit, 3Y
operating cash flow ÷ net profit
2.44x
Share count, 1Y
unchanged

Are profits backed by cash?

6 of 7checks within range1 near a threshold
Other income reliance30%Near threshold

Other income as a share of pre-tax profit (trailing twelve months): 29.8%. Bands: below 15%, 15% to 35%, above 35%.

Tax rate24%Within range

Median quarterly effective tax rate over about 2.5 years: 24.0%. Bands: 15% to 35%, 5% to 15% or 35% to 50%, outside 5% to 50%.

Cash conversion2.44xWithin range

Operating cash flow divided by net profit over the last three fiscal years: 2.44x (cash from operations ₹1,062 cr, net profit ₹435 cr). Bands: 0.8x and above, 0.5x to 0.8x, below 0.5x.

Free cash flow4 of 5 yrsWithin range

Fiscal years with positive free cash flow in the last 5: 4. Bands: at least 80% of years, 40% to 80%, below 40%.

Receivable days vs history+5 daysWithin range

Debtor days are above the median of the previous three fiscal years by 5 days (42 vs 37). Bands: under 15 days, 15 to 45, over 45.

Capital work in progress1% of fixed assetsWithin range

Capital work-in-progress is 1% of fixed assets. Bands: not rising or up to 30%; rising for three years and above 30%; rising and above 60%.

Payable days-3 days / 2 yrsWithin range

Days payable changed by -3 over two years. Bands: rise of up to 30 days; more than 30 days.

Tap a check to see how it is measured

How to read this

Each check is a named rule with fixed thresholds, not a score. Annual statements are the latest restated figures, so a past year may differ from what was originally reported.

All terms explained in the glossary →

Who has been buying and selling?

  • Over 3 years, DIIs trimmed 6.6 pts; FIIs trimmed 1.9 pts.
  • The number of shareholders rose from 44,137 to 68,569 (+55%) between Sep 2023 and Jun 2026.

Holdings, Jun '26

How each group changed

GroupSep '23Jun '26Change
Promoters65.5%65.4%-0.1 pts
FIIs6.0%4.2%-1.9 pts
DIIs25.1%18.5%-6.6 pts
Public and others3.4%11.9%+8.5 pts

Number of shareholders

68,569shareholders+55% since Sep '23
39k50k61k72k Sep '23Jun '24Mar '25Dec '25Jun '26
Sep '23: 44,137
Dec '23: 39,444
Mar '24: 39,103
Jun '24: 51,047
Sep '24: 55,954
Dec '24: 60,354
Mar '25: 60,089
Jun '25: 65,046
Sep '25: 70,544
Dec '25: 72,359
Mar '26: 66,611
Jun '26: 68,569
39k50k61k72k Sep '23Sep '24Sep '25Jun '26
Sep '23: 44,137
Dec '23: 39,444
Mar '24: 39,103
Jun '24: 51,047
Sep '24: 55,954
Dec '24: 60,354
Mar '25: 60,089
Jun '25: 65,046
Sep '25: 70,544
Dec '25: 72,359
Mar '26: 66,611
Jun '26: 68,569

Quarterly shareholding as reported, labelled by the quarter it covers (it becomes visible about two months later).
Shareholder counts are only available for recent quarters.

This quarter's smart-money board

What happened next to similar setups

−3.3%typical 12-month return vs the marketNot meaningfully different from the base rate
  • We found 50 past situations where a non-financial company looked like SHEELA FOAM LIMITED today on valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, price momentum, size and volatility.
  • Over the following 12 months the middle half of them returned −20% to +13% vs the market, against −5% for all non-financial companies in the same months.
  • The gap against the base rate (+1.3%, 80% range −8.2% to +5.3%) is within what chance and overlapping periods produce.

Where the 50 outcomes landed

−50%0%+50%+100%
EVERESTIND · Jan 2024: −54.3% vs market
GANECOS · May 2025: −41.1% vs market
BODALCHEM · Oct 2021: −36.4% vs market
DALBHARAT · Jul 2023: −35.8% vs market
YUKEN · May 2025: −34.4% vs market
TVSSRICHAK · Dec 2023: −33.9% vs market
DOLLAR · Jun 2024: −32.0% vs market
SOMANYCERA · Sep 2023: −27.6% vs market
GVT&D · May 2021: −27.2% vs market
VTL · Apr 2022: −26.2% vs market
UNICHEMLAB · Jun 2025: −21.8% vs market
GOKEX · Oct 2025: −20.7% vs market
SHALBY · Mar 2024: −20.5% vs market
IRMENERGY · Oct 2025: −18.5% vs market
EXIDEIND · Dec 2024: −17.6% vs market
LXCHEM · Jul 2025: −17.0% vs market
TRIDENT · Aug 2025: −16.3% vs market
EPL · Aug 2023: −13.9% vs market
KIRLOSIND · Jul 2025: −13.2% vs market
HUHTAMAKI · Jun 2020: −11.7% vs market
GESHIP · Aug 2020: −11.2% vs market
GOCLCORP · May 2020: −10.5% vs market
TATACHEM · Dec 2022: −7.2% vs market
LUXIND · Apr 2025: −4.5% vs market
JSWENERGY · Jan 2020: −3.8% vs market
NAVNETEDUL · Mar 2023: −2.8% vs market
SHK · Apr 2024: −1.6% vs market
APOLLOTYRE · Jan 2020: −0.8% vs market
VSSL · Jul 2024: +0.4% vs market
SUPRAJIT · Apr 2025: +1.1% vs market
JUBLINGREA · Sep 2025: +1.6% vs market
NILKAMAL · Jun 2022: +5.8% vs market
GLOBUSSPR · Oct 2024: +6.8% vs market
DREDGECORP · Feb 2020: +7.0% vs market
SANGHIIND · Nov 2021: +7.5% vs market
KCP · Apr 2024: +10.2% vs market
ORIENTCEM · Sep 2023: +12.2% vs market
APLLTD · Oct 2023: +13.6% vs market
GENUSPOWER · Feb 2020: +13.6% vs market
BANARISUG · Jun 2021: +16.3% vs market
BIRLACORPN · Apr 2020: +40.4% vs market
MINDACORP · Feb 2023: +46.0% vs market
HSCL · Apr 2022: +51.5% vs market
BBL · Nov 2023: +58.1% vs market
GSFC · Mar 2021: +61.3% vs market
JPPOWER · Feb 2023: +83.2% vs market
BHEL · Aug 2022: +88.4% vs market
ABREL · Apr 2023: +98.6% vs market
BEML · May 2023: +113.4% vs market
ORCHPHARMA · Oct 2023: +122.8% vs market
Similar setups −3.3%All companies −4.6%← worse than the marketbetter than the market →

Each dot is one past situation (hover or tap for details) · Solid dots are the closest matches, listed below · Shaded is the middle half of all companies in the same months · 3 beyond the range shown, drawn at the edge

Similar setups' median
−3.3%
All companies' median
−4.6%
Beat the market
44% vs 45%

50 past situations · 50 companies · 39 months · 2020–2025

The closest matches

CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
GESHIP
Transportation
Aug 2020 18x4% +6%−27% −11%
HUHTAMAKI
Process Industries
Jun 2020 18x— −21%−31% −12%
BEML
Producer Manufacturing
May 2023 47x9% +1%−24% +113%
UNICHEMLAB
Health Technology
Jun 2025 30x6% +11%−35% −22%
DREDGECORP
Transportation
Feb 2020 21x3% −18%−37% +7%
Show the other 3 matches
CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
MINDACORP
Producer Manufacturing
Feb 2023 24x12% −3%−29% +46%
SUPRAJIT
Producer Manufacturing
Apr 2025 41x12% −9%−38% +1%
TVSSRICHAK
Consumer Durables
Dec 2023 44x9% +47%−11% −34%
How reliable is this?

Matched on P/E, P/S, ROCE, operating margin, debt/equity, interest cover, revenue growth, 12-month momentum, drawdown from 12-month high, size and volatility. Closest on: 12-month momentum, drawdown from 12-month high and P/E. One match per company and at most 7 from any one month.

Independent periods: the matches fall in 6 distinct 12-month windows. Matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, so fewer windows means less evidence.

How this is built

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to SHEELA FOAM LIMITED. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

Methodology

How historical analogs are built

Data as of 2026-11-09. Outcome pool: Jan 2020 to Oct 2025.

For every company we look at the situation it is in today (valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, 12-month price momentum, drawdown, size and volatility) and find past company-months that looked most like it. We then show what happened to those past situations over the following 12 months, measured against the ApnaFunda All index and against the base rate. It describes history. It does not predict anything.

What is compared

FeatureWeightNon-financialFinancial
P/E1yesyes
P/S1yes—
P/B1—yes
ROCE1yes—
operating margin1yes—
ROE1—yes
debt/equity0.75yes—
interest cover0.5yes—
revenue growth0.75yesyes
12-month momentum1yesyes
drawdown from 12-month high0.75yesyes
size0.75yesyes
volatility0.5yesyes

Weights were set by judgement before any outcome was looked at and are never tuned on results. Loss-making companies (negative P/E or net profit) are only matched with other loss-making companies. Banks, NBFCs and insurers are compared only with each other and use a different feature set. Every feature is converted, month by month, to its rank among companies in the same pool in that month, so a P/E of 30 in a hot market and a P/E of 22 in a cold one can match if both were equally expensive for their time. Only that month's data is used.

How closeness and the sample are defined

Distance is the weighted root-mean-square gap between the standardised features both companies have. A match needs at least 70% of the query's feature weight, a distance of at most 0.9, and 30 matches at minimum to be shown. We keep up to 50 matches with these exclusions: never the company itself, one match per company (its closest month), and at most 7 from any one calendar month so a single market episode cannot dominate.

Base rate

The base rate is the distribution of 12-month returns, relative to the market, of every eligible company-month in the same pool, with each month weighted to match the months the analogs came from. It answers: how did a random company do in these same months? Because matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, we also report the number of distinct 12-month windows behind a result, and a bootstrap that resamples months decides whether the analog median differs from the base rate at all. "Not meaningfully different" is the usual outcome and the page copy is written for it.

Limits you should know

  • One market period. The outcome pool covers 2020–2025 only (70 months), including the 2020 crash and the 2020–21 rally.
  • Survivorship. Only companies listed today are included. Delisted and bankrupt companies are missing, which flatters past outcomes, particularly for distressed-looking setups.
  • Price return only. Dividends are excluded, and the benchmark is an ApnaFunda market-cap-weighted index of the same listed companies, not an official index.
  • Reporting lag. Fundamentals are matched on an assumed 60-day lag after the quarter end, not on real announcement dates.
  • Pools: non-financial: 98,395 company-months from 2019 companies; financial: 5,659 company-months from 108 companies. 2349 companies currently have a result; the rest are suppressed because too few comparable situations exist.

Does it work? A walk-forward check

The walk-forward check has not been run for this build, so skill is shown as not yet measured.

Disclaimer

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to any company shown. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

What else looks like this?

Companies with the most similar financial profile today, regardless of industry.

NILKAMALNILKAMAL
Consumer Durables
75%similar
EPS growthvolatility
Industrial Services
69%similar
EPS growthvolatility
Producer Manufacturing
67%similar
ROCErevenue
Producer Manufacturing
66%similar
operating margindebt/equity
PSP PROJECTSPSPPROJECT
Industrial Services
65%similar
debt/equityrevenue
Process Industries
71%similar
EPS growthdebt/equity
Process Industries
60%similar
EPS growthoperating margin
JK PAPERJKPAPER
Process Industries
59%similar
market capROCE

Similarity is statistical, based on reported metrics; it does not imply similar business quality or future returns.

What changed?

30 events since Jul '23

  1. NovPriceVolume reached 9.4x its 50-day median on 2026-11-06; price +0.1% that day.
  2. SepPeer rankSlipped to the 3rd quartile of Process Industries on operating margin (from the 2nd quartile).
  3. SepPriceVolume reached 18.7x its 50-day median on 2026-09-08; price +5.2% that day.
  4. JunResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned positive.
  5. JunPeer rankMoved into the 3rd quartile of Process Industries on ROCE (from the bottom quartile).
  6. JunDividendStarted paying a dividend (payout 7% of profit).
  7. MayValuationP/E crossed above the 90th percentile of its own history to date (80.8x).
  8. MayPriceVolume reached 45.5x its 50-day median on 2026-05-15; price +11.3% that day.
Show 22 earlier events
  1. MarPriceFell 76% from the Apr 2022 peak to the Mar 2026 low.
  2. FebPriceVolume reached 59.5x its 50-day median on 2026-02-04; price +14.8% that day.
  3. DecPeer rankMoved into the 2nd quartile of Process Industries on operating margin (from the 3rd quartile).
  4. OctPriceVolume reached 54.3x its 50-day median on 2025-10-13; price -0.4% that day.
  5. SepPeer rankMoved into the 3rd quartile of Process Industries on operating margin (from the bottom quartile).
  6. AugPriceVolume reached 6.5x its 50-day median on 2025-08-26; price +1.5% that day.
  7. JunValuationP/E crossed above the 90th percentile of its own history to date (82.6x).
  8. JunPeer rankSlipped to the bottom quartile of Process Industries on ROCE (from the 3rd quartile).
  9. JunPriceVolume reached 13.7x its 50-day median on 2025-06-05; price +4.7% that day.
  10. MarPriceVolume reached 8.1x its 50-day median on 2025-03-19; price +3.7% that day.
  11. DecValuationP/E crossed above the 90th percentile of its own history to date (66.9x).
  12. DecPriceVolume reached 9.0x its 50-day median on 2024-12-09; price +5.2% that day.
  13. SepPeer rankSlipped to the 3rd quartile of Process Industries on operating margin (from the 2nd quartile).
  14. SepPriceVolume reached 16.7x its 50-day median on 2024-09-27; price -0.9% that day.
  15. JulSharesShare count is up 10.2% over 12 months.
  16. JunResultsRevenue (TTM) reached a new high of ₹2,982 cr.
  17. JunPeer rankSlipped to the 3rd quartile of Process Industries on ROCE (from the 2nd quartile).
  18. JunPriceVolume reached 13.8x its 50-day median on 2024-06-10; price +3.1% that day.
  19. MayValuationP/E fell below the 10th percentile of its own history to date (43.5x).
  20. MarPriceVolume reached 10.7x its 50-day median on 2024-03-27; price -0.7% that day.
  21. DecPriceVolume reached 8.1x its 50-day median on 2023-12-15; price +2.9% that day.
  22. JulPriceVolume reached 94.4x its 50-day median on 2023-07-18; price +4.2% that day.

Events are generated from the data by fixed rules.
The month shown is when the change became visible in the reported figures, assuming a 60-day lag after each quarter end; it is not an announcement date.

Where price and fundamentals disagree, market-wide Rewind the whole market to any month

Monthly history60 months · 2021-12 to 2026-11
MonthP/ERevenue (TTM)ROEROCEDebt / Equity
2026-1128.3x₹4031 cr6.6%6.0%0.3x
2026-1027.6x₹4031 cr6.7%6.0%0.3x
2026-0932.2x₹4031 cr6.7%6.0%0.3x
2026-0843.8x₹3820 cr5.0%6.0%0.3x
2026-0753.5x₹3820 cr5.0%6.0%0.3x
2026-0651.0x₹3820 cr5.0%6.0%0.3x
2026-0580.8x₹3620 cr2.8%4.0%0.5x
2026-0468.0x₹3620 cr2.8%4.0%0.5x
2026-0362.1x₹3620 cr2.8%4.0%0.5x
2026-02129.4x₹3513 cr1.6%4.0%0.5x
2026-01122.7x₹3513 cr1.6%4.0%0.5x
2025-12138.2x₹3513 cr1.6%4.0%0.5x
2025-11116.1x₹3451 cr1.9%4.0%0.5x
2025-10135.3x₹3451 cr1.9%4.0%0.5x
2025-09128.3x₹3451 cr1.9%4.0%0.5x
2025-0878.6x₹3440 cr3.2%4.0%0.5x
2025-0775.3x₹3440 cr3.2%4.0%0.5x
2025-0682.6x₹3440 cr3.2%4.0%0.5x
2025-0546.4x₹3435 cr5.1%8.0%0.5x
2025-0447.6x₹3435 cr5.1%8.0%0.5x
2025-0352.4x₹3435 cr5.1%8.0%0.5x
2025-0248.1x₹3347 cr5.6%8.0%0.5x
2025-0161.7x₹3347 cr5.6%8.0%0.5x
2024-1266.9x₹3347 cr5.6%8.0%0.5x
2024-1149.3x₹3147 cr6.4%8.0%0.5x
2024-1048.8x₹3147 cr6.4%8.0%0.5x
2024-0954.0x₹3147 cr6.4%8.0%0.5x
2024-0853.8x₹2982 cr6.3%8.0%0.5x
2024-0759.4x₹2982 cr6.3%8.0%0.5x
2024-0653.1x₹2982 cr6.3%8.0%0.5x
2024-0543.5x₹2873 cr12.6%14.0%0.4x
2024-0444.4x₹2873 cr12.6%14.0%0.4x
2024-0346.3x₹2873 cr12.6%14.0%0.4x
2024-0250.8x₹2873 cr12.6%14.0%0.4x
2024-0157.6x₹2873 cr12.6%14.0%0.4x
2023-1260.8x₹2873 cr12.6%14.0%0.4x
2023-1156.3x₹2873 cr12.6%14.0%0.4x
2023-1053.0x₹2873 cr12.6%14.0%0.4x
2023-0956.0x₹2873 cr12.6%14.0%0.4x
2023-0855.0x₹2873 cr12.6%14.0%0.4x
2023-0759.5x₹2873 cr12.6%14.0%0.4x
2023-0659.4x₹2873 cr12.6%14.0%0.4x
2023-0545.3x₹2866 cr15.7%18.0%0.3x
2023-0446.9x₹2866 cr15.7%18.0%0.3x
2023-0344.6x₹2866 cr15.7%18.0%0.3x
2023-0252.7x₹2866 cr15.7%18.0%0.3x
2023-0155.0x₹2866 cr15.7%18.0%0.3x
2022-1258.3x₹2866 cr15.7%18.0%0.3x
2022-1157.9x₹2866 cr15.7%18.0%0.3x
2022-1062.4x₹2866 cr15.7%18.0%0.3x
2022-0964.5x₹2866 cr15.7%18.0%0.3x
2022-0866.9x₹2866 cr15.7%18.0%0.3x
2022-0763.3x₹2866 cr15.7%18.0%0.3x
2022-0659.7x₹2866 cr15.7%18.0%0.3x
2022-0561.7x₹2437 cr20.3%23.0%0.3x
2022-0472.2x₹2437 cr20.3%23.0%0.3x
2022-0371.3x₹2437 cr20.3%23.0%0.3x
2022-0270.3x₹2437 cr20.3%23.0%0.3x
2022-0167.0x₹2437 cr20.3%23.0%0.3x
2021-1266.3x₹2437 cr20.3%23.0%0.3x

Older months are in the live observatory.

Methodology and data notes

Methodology

Methodology and data notes

All figures come from public exchange prices and screener.in financial statements. Quarterly and annual results are shown from 60 days after the period end, so a month never uses a result before it would plausibly have been published. Statements are the latest versions, which may include later restatements.

Sector medians, percentiles and indices use today's listed companies in the sector (survivorship bias). Prices are adjusted for splits and bonus issues; around a corporate action the fundamentals may lag the price by up to a month, and affected sections are hidden.

The return decomposition uses price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count. The reverse DCF uses a fixed 12% cost of equity, a 10-year horizon and a 15x terminal P/E, and is an illustration only. Events, flags and twins follow fixed rules and thresholds described next to each section.

Feedback