अApnaFunda

KRITIKA WIRES LIMITED (KRITIKA)

Producer Manufacturing · Metal Fabrication · figures to Nov '26

Quality scoreHow the business itself ranks against its sector peers on profitability, 3-year growth and leverage. 50 is the middle of the sector.37 / 100
Profitability 16Growth 60Balance sheet 37

Passes these screensCash Rich

Share price

Closing priceAdjusted for splits and bonus issues.

₹5.03 latest close · −13.4% over the last 90 sessions

₹5₹5₹6₹6Jul 3Jul 29Aug 24Sep 17Oct 14Nov 9 ₹5₹5₹6₹6Jul 3Sep 4Nov 9

₹5.03 month-end · −32.8% over 12 months

₹5₹6₹7Nov '25Jan '26Apr '26Jun '26Sep '26Nov '26 ₹5₹6₹7Nov '25May '26Nov '26

₹5.03 month-end · −41.2% over 3 years

₹10₹20Nov '23Jun '24Jan '25Sep '25Apr '26Nov '26 ₹10₹20Nov '23May '25Nov '26

₹5.03 month-end · +21.2% since May '22

₹10₹20May '22Apr '23Mar '24Jan '25Dec '25Nov '26 ₹10₹20May '22Aug '24Nov '26

52-week range ₹4.41 to ₹8.60 · 1-year volatility 42.2%

Was the rally earned?

-33%share price, 1 yearEarnings-driven

Mostly earnings.

  • Per-share earnings took off 31 points, while the multiple moved less (P/E 21.4x to 21.0x).
  • The share count barely moved.
Net profit growth: −32 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).−32 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: −2 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−2 ptsP/E changeShare count change: 0 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.0 ptsShare count changeShare price: −33%−33%Share priceNet profit growth: −32 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).−32ProfitP/E change: −2 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−2P/EShare count change: 0 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.0SharesShare price: −33%−33%Share price
Net profit growth-32 ptsNet profit fell about 32%, which lowers the price.
P/E change-2 ptsThe P/E fell from 21.4x to 21.0x, which lowers the price.
Share count change0 ptsShare count was little changed. More shares would count against the price.
-41%share price, 3 yearsLower P/E held it back

Earnings helped, the multiple did not.

  • Per-share earnings added 7 points, but investors now pay less per rupee of profit (P/E 38.9x to 21.0x), which took 48 points back.
  • The share count fell 3%.
Net profit growth: +5 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+5 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: −48 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−48 ptsP/E changeShare count change: +2 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.+2 ptsShare count changeShare price: −41%−41%Share priceNet profit growth: +5 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+5ProfitP/E change: −48 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−48P/EShare count change: +2 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.+2SharesShare price: −41%−41%Share price
Net profit growth+5 ptsNet profit rose about 6%, which lifts the price.
P/E change-48 ptsThe P/E fell from 38.9x to 21.0x, which lowers the price.
Share count change+2 ptsShare count fell 3%, which lifts the price.
What do "pts" mean?

"pts" are percentage points of the share price return. The parts add up to the total shown for each period. Because price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count, higher profit pushes the price up, a higher P/E pushes it up, and more shares push it down.

Example: if the price rose 34% and profit growth accounts for +58 pts while a lower P/E accounts for -24 pts, then 58 - 24 = 34. The +58 is not the profit growth rate itself: it is the part of the price move that profit growth explains.

Not shown for 5 years: earnings were negative at one end, or there is not enough history.

Net profit is trailing twelve months as reported with a 60-day lag.

Compare this with BHARAT FORGE

How rough has the ride been?

Maximum drawdown-82.3%recovered 2024-02
1-year volatility42.2%annualised

Drawdown from peak

0%−25%−50%−75%2023202420252026−81.7% 0%−25%−50%−75%2023202420252026−81.7%
Largest drawdowns

-82.3% (2022-09 peak to 2023-03 low, recovered 2024-02)

-81.7% (2024-05 peak to 2026-10 low, not yet recovered)

-33.3% (2022-05 peak to 2022-05 low, recovered 2022-06)

Is it expensive against its own past and its peers?

21.0xP/E todayNear its historic low
Against its own history16th percentile
CheapestMedian 26.1xDearest

Usual range 20.4x to 61.0x since 2022-05.

Against Producer Manufacturing21.0x vs 29.6x
This company
21.0x
Sector median
29.6x

29% below the Producer Manufacturing median.

16.3x57.0x97.7x138.3xMay '22Apr '23Mar '24Feb '25Jan '26Nov '2616.3x57.0x97.7x138.3xMay '22Nov '23May '25Nov '26
P/E (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianProducer Manufacturing median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/B (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianProducer Manufacturing median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/S (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianProducer Manufacturing median
How to read this

Shaded band: 10th to 90th percentile of the company's own P/E history; dotted line: its median; orange line: sector median (companies with a positive multiple, at least 5 in the sector).

Sector figures are built from today's listed companies, so they exclude companies that are no longer listed.

All terms explained in the glossary →

How Producer Manufacturing is valued

Where does it rank among Producer Manufacturing peers?

Each cell is the company's percentile rank among its Producer Manufacturing peers (non-financial companies) that month.
Darker is better-ranked.
Rows marked ↓ are inverted (lower debt, shorter cash cycle and a lower P/E rank higher).

Where it ranks today

  • ROCE24th▼ 22 pts vs a year ago
  • Op. margin7thflat vs a year ago
  • Revenue growth6th▼ 89 pts vs a year ago
  • EPS growth17th▼ 11 pts vs a year ago
  • Debt/equity ↓28thflat vs a year ago
  • Cash cycle ↓83rdflat vs a year ago
  • P/E ↓68th▼ 5 pts vs a year ago
  • 12M momentum17thflat vs a year ago

Rank history

ROCE
Op. margin
Revenue growth
EPS growth
Debt/equity ↓
Cash cycle ↓
P/E ↓
12M momentum
Dec '21Jul '22Jan '23Jul '23Jan '24Jul '24Jan '25Jul '25Jan '26Jul '26Nov '26
Lower rank Higher rank Not enough data

Percentiles use today's listed companies in the sector and need at least 5 peers with a value; grey cells have too few.
ROE is computed from net profit and book value where the source does not report it.

The Producer Manufacturing sector page Watch it move against Producer Manufacturing in the Observatory

What is the price implying?

~15%annual earnings growth implied by the price

At a P/E of 18.7x, the price would imply about 14.5%/yr earnings growth for 10 years under the same assumptions, but it is not ranked.

Below the ₹1,000 cr market-cap floor used for the lists.

“Implied growth” is what the current price would require under our stated assumptions, not what we expect.

What prices imply across Producer Manufacturing The market-wide Expectations lists

Key figures

Share Priceclose 9 Nov
₹5.03
P/E
21.0x
ROCE
9.0%
Market Cap
₹134 cr
Revenue (TTM)
₹649 cr
P/S
0.2x
P/B
1.3x
ROE
6.3%
Operating Margin
1.5%
Debt / Equity
0.5x
Promoter Holding
63.3%
12M Momentum
-32.8%

52-week range

₹4.41₹8.60
15% of the way from its 52-week low to its high

Price risk

1Y volatility
42.2%
Beta vs sector
1-year daily
1.01

Balance sheet & cash

Interest cover
operating profit ÷ interest
2.5x
Cash from profit, 3Y
operating cash flow ÷ net profit
1.54x
Share count, 1Y
unchanged

Are profits backed by cash?

5 of 7checks within range2 near a threshold
Other income reliance32%Near threshold

Other income as a share of pre-tax profit (trailing twelve months): 32.5%. Bands: below 15%, 15% to 35%, above 35%.

Tax rate25%Within range

Median quarterly effective tax rate over about 2.5 years: 24.9%. Bands: 15% to 35%, 5% to 15% or 35% to 50%, outside 5% to 50%.

Cash conversion1.54xWithin range

Operating cash flow divided by net profit over the last three fiscal years: 1.54x (cash from operations ₹40 cr, net profit ₹26 cr). Bands: 0.8x and above, 0.5x to 0.8x, below 0.5x.

Free cash flow3 of 5 yrsNear threshold

Fiscal years with positive free cash flow in the last 5: 3. Bands: at least 80% of years, 40% to 80%, below 40%.

Receivable days vs history-16 daysWithin range

Debtor days are below the median of the previous three fiscal years by 16 days (19 vs 35). Bands: under 15 days, 15 to 45, over 45.

Capital work in progress4% of fixed assetsWithin range

Capital work-in-progress is 4% of fixed assets. Bands: not rising or up to 30%; rising for three years and above 30%; rising and above 60%.

Payable days-14 days / 2 yrsWithin range

Days payable changed by -14 over two years. Bands: rise of up to 30 days; more than 30 days.

Tap a check to see how it is measured

How to read this

Each check is a named rule with fixed thresholds, not a score. Annual statements are the latest restated figures, so a past year may differ from what was originally reported.

All terms explained in the glossary →

Who has been buying and selling?

  • Over 3 years, promoters added 3.5 pts.
  • The number of shareholders rose from 42,119 to 74,641 (+77%) between Dec 2023 and Jun 2026.

Holdings, Jun '26

How each group changed

GroupDec '23Jun '26Change
Promoters59.9%63.3%+3.5 pts
FIIs0.0%0.0%0.0 pts
DIIs———
Public and others40.1%36.7%-3.5 pts

Number of shareholders

74,641shareholders+77% since Dec '23
42k55k69k82k Dec '23Sep '24Mar '25Sep '25Jun '26
Dec '23: 42,119
Mar '24: 47,777
Sep '24: 64,527
Dec '24: 79,711
Mar '25: 81,924
Jun '25: 80,651
Sep '25: 79,391
Jun '26: 74,641
42k55k69k82k Dec '23Dec '24Sep '25Jun '26
Dec '23: 42,119
Mar '24: 47,777
Sep '24: 64,527
Dec '24: 79,711
Mar '25: 81,924
Jun '25: 80,651
Sep '25: 79,391
Jun '26: 74,641

Quarterly shareholding as reported, labelled by the quarter it covers (it becomes visible about two months later).
Shareholder counts are only available for recent quarters.

This quarter's smart-money board

What happened next to similar setups

+3.4%typical 12-month return vs the marketAbove the base rate
  • We found 50 past situations where a non-financial company looked like KRITIKA WIRES LIMITED today on valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, price momentum, size and volatility.
  • Over the following 12 months the middle half of them returned −14% to +43% vs the market, against −6% for all non-financial companies in the same months.
  • The analogs' median sat above that base rate (gap +9.3%, 80% range +2.5% to +19.9%), but the matches cluster in only 6 distinct 12-month windows.

Where the 50 outcomes landed

−100%−50%0%+50%+100%
RANASUG · Jan 2025: −41.4% vs market
PIONEEREMB · Sep 2025: −40.5% vs market
3IINFOLTD · Jun 2025: −27.7% vs market
MAHESHWARI · Feb 2022: −26.0% vs market
AKG · Mar 2025: −23.9% vs market
SUPERHOUSE · Jun 2024: −21.6% vs market
PARAGMILK · Mar 2022: −20.8% vs market
MADRASFERT · Dec 2024: −20.7% vs market
ASTRON · Jan 2023: −20.2% vs market
TEXMOPIPES · Aug 2024: −19.4% vs market
ISFT · Jan 2023: −18.6% vs market
COASTCORP · May 2024: −16.0% vs market
MEGASTAR · Aug 2024: −15.9% vs market
MAWANASUG · Jan 2024: −9.2% vs market
BVCL · Jul 2025: −7.9% vs market
AAREYDRUGS · Jun 2023: −6.8% vs market
PATINTLOG · Jun 2022: −6.8% vs market
NCLIND · Mar 2024: −4.8% vs market
NAHARINDUS · Mar 2025: −3.3% vs market
SUTLEJTEX · Dec 2023: −2.6% vs market
BANSWRAS · Sep 2024: −2.3% vs market
JAYBARMARU · Dec 2024: −1.2% vs market
BODALCHEM · May 2024: 0% vs market
SHIGAN · Apr 2025: +0.8% vs market
DCMNVL · Dec 2023: +1.8% vs market
DBOL · Jan 2025: +5.0% vs market
CORDSCABLE · Aug 2021: +7.7% vs market
INCREDIBLE · Sep 2022: +8.3% vs market
MUNJALAU · Jul 2022: +14.0% vs market
IVP · Oct 2025: +16.4% vs market
PCJEWELLER · Apr 2022: +17.0% vs market
BHARATGEAR · Jan 2025: +19.4% vs market
ARIES · Jul 2022: +22.5% vs market
MANAKALUCO · Feb 2025: +24.7% vs market
NECLIFE · Mar 2023: +27.2% vs market
TARMAT · Dec 2022: +32.5% vs market
NELCAST · Mar 2025: +42.3% vs market
HPL · Oct 2020: +43.3% vs market
KALYANIFRG · Sep 2024: +45.8% vs market
SHREYANIND · Dec 2021: +50.4% vs market
NECCLTD · Feb 2020: +53.8% vs market
RUCHIRA · Dec 2021: +75.0% vs market
NDL · Sep 2023: +85.3% vs market
ORIENTBELL · Apr 2020: +100.2% vs market
TBZ · May 2020: +102.2% vs market
KANPRPLA · May 2024: +134.8% vs market
LEMERITE · Aug 2023: +143.6% vs market
BSL · Jan 2021: +157.7% vs market
SHIVAMILLS · Nov 2020: +169.8% vs market
SKIPPER · Aug 2022: +239.9% vs market
Similar setups +3.4%All companies −5.9%← worse than the marketbetter than the market →

Each dot is one past situation (hover or tap for details) · Solid dots are the closest matches, listed below · Shaded is the middle half of all companies in the same months · 7 beyond the range shown, drawn at the edge

Similar setups' median
+3.4%
All companies' median
−5.9%
Beat the market
54% vs 43%

50 past situations · 50 companies · 37 months · 2020–2025

The closest matches

CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
AAREYDRUGS
Health Technology
Jun 2023 23x6% +4%−18% −7%
DCMNVL
Process Industries
Dec 2023 26x5% +7%−15% +2%
PATINTLOG
Transportation
Jun 2022 11x10% −24%−38% −7%
SUTLEJTEX
Process Industries
Dec 2023 26x8% −6%−15% −3%
MUNJALAU
Producer Manufacturing
Jul 2022 16x11% −34%−38% +14%
Show the other 3 matches
CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
MAWANASUG
Process Industries
Jan 2024 28x6% +8%−16% −9%
NDL
Process Industries
Sep 2023 —5% −17%−17% +85%
NECLIFE
Health Technology
Mar 2023 14x5% −34%−51% +27%
How reliable is this?

Matched on P/E, P/S, ROCE, operating margin, debt/equity, interest cover, revenue growth, 12-month momentum, drawdown from 12-month high, size and volatility. Closest on: 12-month momentum, interest cover and drawdown from 12-month high. One match per company and at most 7 from any one month.

Independent periods: the matches fall in 6 distinct 12-month windows. Matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, so fewer windows means less evidence.

How this is built

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to KRITIKA WIRES LIMITED. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

Methodology

How historical analogs are built

Data as of 2026-11-09. Outcome pool: Jan 2020 to Oct 2025.

For every company we look at the situation it is in today (valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, 12-month price momentum, drawdown, size and volatility) and find past company-months that looked most like it. We then show what happened to those past situations over the following 12 months, measured against the ApnaFunda All index and against the base rate. It describes history. It does not predict anything.

What is compared

FeatureWeightNon-financialFinancial
P/E1yesyes
P/S1yes—
P/B1—yes
ROCE1yes—
operating margin1yes—
ROE1—yes
debt/equity0.75yes—
interest cover0.5yes—
revenue growth0.75yesyes
12-month momentum1yesyes
drawdown from 12-month high0.75yesyes
size0.75yesyes
volatility0.5yesyes

Weights were set by judgement before any outcome was looked at and are never tuned on results. Loss-making companies (negative P/E or net profit) are only matched with other loss-making companies. Banks, NBFCs and insurers are compared only with each other and use a different feature set. Every feature is converted, month by month, to its rank among companies in the same pool in that month, so a P/E of 30 in a hot market and a P/E of 22 in a cold one can match if both were equally expensive for their time. Only that month's data is used.

How closeness and the sample are defined

Distance is the weighted root-mean-square gap between the standardised features both companies have. A match needs at least 70% of the query's feature weight, a distance of at most 0.9, and 30 matches at minimum to be shown. We keep up to 50 matches with these exclusions: never the company itself, one match per company (its closest month), and at most 7 from any one calendar month so a single market episode cannot dominate.

Base rate

The base rate is the distribution of 12-month returns, relative to the market, of every eligible company-month in the same pool, with each month weighted to match the months the analogs came from. It answers: how did a random company do in these same months? Because matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, we also report the number of distinct 12-month windows behind a result, and a bootstrap that resamples months decides whether the analog median differs from the base rate at all. "Not meaningfully different" is the usual outcome and the page copy is written for it.

Limits you should know

  • One market period. The outcome pool covers 2020–2025 only (70 months), including the 2020 crash and the 2020–21 rally.
  • Survivorship. Only companies listed today are included. Delisted and bankrupt companies are missing, which flatters past outcomes, particularly for distressed-looking setups.
  • Price return only. Dividends are excluded, and the benchmark is an ApnaFunda market-cap-weighted index of the same listed companies, not an official index.
  • Reporting lag. Fundamentals are matched on an assumed 60-day lag after the quarter end, not on real announcement dates.
  • Pools: non-financial: 98,395 company-months from 2019 companies; financial: 5,659 company-months from 108 companies. 2349 companies currently have a result; the rest are suppressed because too few comparable situations exist.

Does it work? A walk-forward check

The walk-forward check has not been run for this build, so skill is shown as not yet measured.

Disclaimer

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to any company shown. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

What changed?

23 events since May '22

  1. OctPriceFell 82% from the May 2024 peak to the Oct 2026 low.
  2. JunPeer rankSlipped to the bottom quartile of Producer Manufacturing on ROCE (from the 3rd quartile).
  3. DecPeer rankSlipped to the bottom quartile of Producer Manufacturing on EPS growth (from the 3rd quartile).
  4. NovValuationP/E fell below the 10th percentile of its own history to date (21.4x).
  5. JunResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned negative.
  6. JunPeer rankSlipped to the 3rd quartile of Producer Manufacturing on EPS growth (from the top quartile).
  7. FebValuationP/E fell below the 10th percentile of its own history to date (18.7x).
  8. DecPromoterPromoter holding fell 9.2 pts to 63.4%.
Show 15 earlier events
  1. JunPromoterPromoter holding rose 12.7 pts to 72.5%.
  2. JunResultsRevenue (TTM) reached a new high of ₹432 cr.
  3. JunPeer rankMoved into the top quartile of Producer Manufacturing on EPS growth (from the 2nd quartile).
  4. MayValuationP/E crossed above the 90th percentile of its own history to date (93.6x).
  5. AprPriceRegained the 2024-03 peak, 0 months after the low.
  6. AprPriceFell 29% from the Mar 2024 peak to the Apr 2024 low.
  7. FebPriceRegained the 2022-09 peak, 11 months after the low.
  8. JunResultsRevenue (TTM) reached a new high of ₹282 cr.
  9. JunPeer rankSlipped to the 2nd quartile of Producer Manufacturing on EPS growth (from the top quartile).
  10. JunDividendDividend payout cut from 22% to 0% of profit.
  11. MarPriceFell 82% from the Sep 2022 peak to the Mar 2023 low.
  12. JunPriceRegained the 2022-05 peak, 1 month after the low.
  13. JunPeer rankMoved into the 3rd quartile of Producer Manufacturing on ROCE (from the bottom quartile).
  14. JunDividendStarted paying a dividend (payout 22% of profit).
  15. MayPriceFell 33% from the May 2022 peak to the May 2022 low.

Events are generated from the data by fixed rules.
The month shown is when the change became visible in the reported figures, assuming a 60-day lag after each quarter end; it is not an announcement date.

Where price and fundamentals disagree, market-wide Rewind the whole market to any month

Monthly history55 months · 2022-05 to 2026-11
MonthP/ERevenue (TTM)ROEROCEDebt / Equity
2026-1121.0x₹649 cr6.3%9.0%0.5x
2026-1020.9x₹649 cr6.4%9.0%0.5x
2026-0920.5x₹649 cr6.4%9.0%0.5x
2026-0823.4x₹694 cr6.1%9.0%0.5x
2026-0726.7x₹694 cr6.1%9.0%0.5x
2026-0625.0x₹694 cr6.1%9.0%0.5x
2026-0521.9x₹787 cr8.0%15.0%0.5x
2026-0422.5x₹787 cr8.0%15.0%0.5x
2026-0316.3x₹787 cr8.0%15.0%0.5x
2026-0220.3x₹805 cr8.6%15.0%0.5x
2026-0122.2x₹805 cr8.6%15.0%0.5x
2025-1224.5x₹805 cr8.6%15.0%0.5x
2025-1121.4x₹784 cr9.9%15.0%0.5x
2025-1024.0x₹784 cr9.9%15.0%0.5x
2025-0924.2x₹784 cr9.9%15.0%0.5x
2025-0824.3x₹745 cr10.8%15.0%0.5x
2025-0724.1x₹745 cr10.8%15.0%0.5x
2025-0626.1x₹745 cr10.8%15.0%0.5x
2025-0522.7x₹639 cr14.0%16.0%0.5x
2025-0422.0x₹639 cr14.0%16.0%0.5x
2025-0319.5x₹639 cr14.0%16.0%0.5x
2025-0218.7x₹553 cr13.8%16.0%0.5x
2025-0124.4x₹553 cr13.8%16.0%0.5x
2024-1226.5x₹553 cr13.8%16.0%0.5x
2024-1128.7x₹499 cr13.3%16.0%0.5x
2024-1032.1x₹499 cr13.3%16.0%0.5x
2024-0944.5x₹499 cr13.3%16.0%0.5x
2024-0848.7x₹432 cr12.4%16.0%0.5x
2024-0750.4x₹432 cr12.4%16.0%0.5x
2024-0649.3x₹432 cr12.4%16.0%0.5x
2024-0593.6x₹282 cr8.1%12.0%0.3x
2024-04103.2x₹282 cr8.1%12.0%0.3x
2024-0376.1x₹282 cr8.1%12.0%0.3x
2024-0284.5x₹282 cr8.1%12.0%0.3x
2024-0154.1x₹282 cr8.1%12.0%0.3x
2023-1251.1x₹282 cr8.1%12.0%0.3x
2023-1138.9x₹282 cr8.1%12.0%0.3x
2023-1032.0x₹282 cr8.1%12.0%0.3x
2023-0933.9x₹282 cr8.1%12.0%0.3x
2023-0829.1x₹282 cr8.1%12.0%0.3x
2023-0723.2x₹282 cr8.1%12.0%0.3x
2023-0625.0x₹282 cr8.1%12.0%0.3x
2023-0540.0x₹244 cr2.0%9.0%0.3x
2023-0425.7x₹244 cr2.0%9.0%0.3x
2023-0318.0x₹244 cr2.0%9.0%0.3x
2023-0220.0x₹244 cr2.0%9.0%0.3x
2023-0124.0x₹244 cr2.0%9.0%0.3x
2022-1228.0x₹244 cr2.0%9.0%0.3x
2022-1134.0x₹244 cr2.0%9.0%0.3x
2022-1040.3x₹244 cr2.0%9.0%0.3x
2022-0947.3x₹244 cr2.0%9.0%0.3x
2022-0865.7x₹244 cr2.0%9.0%0.3x
2022-0749.3x₹244 cr2.0%9.0%0.3x
2022-0634.0x₹244 cr2.0%9.0%0.3x
2022-05138.3x₹135 cr0.4%4.0%0.5x

Methodology and data notes

Methodology

Methodology and data notes

All figures come from public exchange prices and screener.in financial statements. Quarterly and annual results are shown from 60 days after the period end, so a month never uses a result before it would plausibly have been published. Statements are the latest versions, which may include later restatements.

Sector medians, percentiles and indices use today's listed companies in the sector (survivorship bias). Prices are adjusted for splits and bonus issues; around a corporate action the fundamentals may lag the price by up to a month, and affected sections are hidden.

The return decomposition uses price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count. The reverse DCF uses a fixed 12% cost of equity, a 10-year horizon and a 15x terminal P/E, and is an illustration only. Events, flags and twins follow fixed rules and thresholds described next to each section.

Feedback