अApnaFunda

LORDS CHLORO ALKALI LTD (LORDSCHLO)

Process Industries · Chemicals: Specialty · figures to Nov '26

Quality scoreHow the business itself ranks against its sector peers on profitability, 3-year growth and leverage. 50 is the middle of the sector.51 / 100
Profitability 72Growth 49Balance sheet 33

Passes these screensValue Pick

Share price

Closing priceAdjusted for splits and bonus issues.

₹129.42 latest close · −3.9% over the last 90 sessions

₹130₹140₹150₹160Jul 3Jul 29Aug 24Sep 17Oct 14Nov 9 ₹130₹140₹150₹160Jul 3Sep 4Nov 9

₹129.42 month-end · −29.9% over 12 months

₹125₹150₹175Nov '25Jan '26Apr '26Jun '26Sep '26Nov '26 ₹125₹150₹175Nov '25May '26Nov '26

₹129.42 month-end · −11.4% over 3 years

₹100₹150₹200Nov '23Jun '24Jan '25Sep '25Apr '26Nov '26 ₹100₹150₹200Nov '23May '25Nov '26

₹129.42 month-end · −29.0% since Aug '23

₹100₹150₹200Aug '23Apr '24Dec '24Jul '25Mar '26Nov '26 ₹100₹150₹200Aug '23Apr '25Nov '26

52-week range ₹108.00 to ₹229.49 · 1-year volatility 45.6%

Was the rally earned?

-30%share price, 1 yearLower P/E held it back

Earnings helped, the multiple did not.

  • Per-share earnings added 62 points, but investors now pay less per rupee of profit (P/E 31.7x to 10.6x), which took 92 points back.
  • The share count rose 13%.
Net profit growth: +72 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+72 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: −92 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−92 ptsP/E changeShare count change: −10 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−10 ptsShare count changeShare price: −30%−30%Share priceNet profit growth: +72 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+72ProfitP/E change: −92 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−92P/EShare count change: −10 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−10SharesShare price: −30%−30%Share price
Net profit growth+72 ptsNet profit rose about 136%, which lifts the price.
P/E change-92 ptsThe P/E fell from 31.7x to 10.6x, which lowers the price.
Share count change-10 ptsShare count rose 13%, which lowers the price.
-11%share price, 3 yearsEarnings-driven

Mostly earnings.

  • Per-share earnings took off 52 points, while the multiple moved less (P/E 6.9x to 10.6x).
  • The share count rose 8%.
Net profit growth: −45 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).−45 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: +41 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+41 ptsP/E changeShare count change: −7 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−7 ptsShare count changeShare price: −11%−11%Share priceNet profit growth: −45 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).−45ProfitP/E change: +41 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+41P/EShare count change: −7 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−7SharesShare price: −11%−11%Share price
Net profit growth-45 ptsNet profit fell about 38%, which lowers the price.
P/E change+41 ptsThe P/E rose from 6.9x to 10.6x, which lifts the price.
Share count change-7 ptsShare count rose 8%, which lowers the price.
What do "pts" mean?

"pts" are percentage points of the share price return. The parts add up to the total shown for each period. Because price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count, higher profit pushes the price up, a higher P/E pushes it up, and more shares push it down.

Example: if the price rose 34% and profit growth accounts for +58 pts while a lower P/E accounts for -24 pts, then 58 - 24 = 34. The +58 is not the profit growth rate itself: it is the part of the price move that profit growth explains.

Not shown for 5 years: earnings were negative at one end, or there is not enough history.

Net profit is trailing twelve months as reported with a 60-day lag.

Compare this with LINDE INDIA

How rough has the ride been?

Maximum drawdown-52.3%not yet recovered
1-year volatility45.6%annualised

Drawdown from peak

0%−20%−40%202420252026−50.9% 0%−20%−40%202420252026−50.9%
Largest drawdowns

-52.3% (2025-07 peak to 2026-03 low, not yet recovered)

-42.8% (2023-08 peak to 2024-03 low, recovered 2025-01)

-40.1% (2025-01 peak to 2025-03 low, recovered 2025-07)

Is it expensive against its own past and its peers?

10.6xP/E todayWithin its usual range
Against its own history39th percentile
CheapestMedian 12.2xDearest

Usual range 6.2x to 90.5x since 2023-08.

Against Process Industries10.6x vs 18.1x
This company
10.6x
Sector median
18.1x

41% below the Process Industries median.

5.3x43.7x82.1x120.5xAug '23Apr '24Dec '24Aug '25Apr '26Nov '265.3x43.7x82.1x120.5xAug '23Sep '24Oct '25Nov '26
P/E (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianProcess Industries median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/B (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianProcess Industries median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/S (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianProcess Industries median
How to read this

Shaded band: 10th to 90th percentile of the company's own P/E history; dotted line: its median; orange line: sector median (companies with a positive multiple, at least 5 in the sector).

Sector figures are built from today's listed companies, so they exclude companies that are no longer listed.

All terms explained in the glossary →

How Process Industries is valued

Where does it rank among Process Industries peers?

Each cell is the company's percentile rank among its Process Industries peers (non-financial companies) that month.
Darker is better-ranked.
Rows marked ↓ are inverted (lower debt, shorter cash cycle and a lower P/E rank higher).

Where it ranks today

  • ROCE59th▲ 39 pts vs a year ago
  • Op. margin85thflat vs a year ago
  • Revenue growth87thflat vs a year ago
  • EPS growth89th
  • Debt/equity ↓28thflat vs a year ago
  • Cash cycle ↓26thflat vs a year ago
  • P/E ↓76th▲ 42 pts vs a year ago
  • 12M momentum18th▼ 70 pts vs a year ago

Rank history

ROCE
Op. margin
Revenue growth
EPS growth
Debt/equity ↓
Cash cycle ↓
P/E ↓
12M momentum
Dec '21Jul '22Jan '23Jul '23Jan '24Jul '24Jan '25Jul '25Jan '26Jul '26Nov '26
Lower rank Higher rank Not enough data

Percentiles use today's listed companies in the sector and need at least 5 peers with a value; grey cells have too few.
ROE is computed from net profit and book value where the source does not report it.

The Process Industries sector page Watch it move against Process Industries in the Observatory

What is the price implying?

~12%annual earnings growth implied by the price

At a P/E of 15.4x, the price would imply about 12.3%/yr earnings growth for 10 years under the same assumptions, but it is not ranked.

Below the ₹1,000 cr market-cap floor used for the lists.

“Implied growth” is what the current price would require under our stated assumptions, not what we expect.

What prices imply across Process Industries The market-wide Expectations lists

Key figures

Share Priceclose 9 Nov
₹129.42
P/E
10.6x
ROCE
13.0%
Market Cap
₹370 cr
Revenue (TTM)
₹396 cr
P/S
0.9x
P/B
1.5x
ROE
14.3%
Operating Margin
21.0%
Debt / Equity
0.7x
Promoter Holding
75.0%
12M Momentum
-29.9%

52-week range

₹108.00₹229.49
18% of the way from its 52-week low to its high

Price risk

1Y volatility
45.6%
Beta vs sector
1-year daily
1.13

Balance sheet & cash

Interest cover
operating profit ÷ interest
4.8x
Cash from profit, 3Y
operating cash flow ÷ net profit
0.72x
Share count, 1Y
+16.0%

Are profits backed by cash?

5 of 7checks within range2 near a threshold
Other income reliance5%Within range

Other income as a share of pre-tax profit (trailing twelve months): 5.0%. Bands: below 15%, 15% to 35%, above 35%.

Tax rate29%Within range

Median quarterly effective tax rate over about 2.5 years: 28.5%. Bands: 15% to 35%, 5% to 15% or 35% to 50%, outside 5% to 50%.

Cash conversion0.72xNear threshold

Operating cash flow divided by net profit over the last three fiscal years: 0.72x (cash from operations ₹21 cr, net profit ₹29 cr). Bands: 0.8x and above, 0.5x to 0.8x, below 0.5x.

Free cash flow2 of 5 yrsNear threshold

Fiscal years with positive free cash flow in the last 5: 2. Bands: at least 80% of years, 40% to 80%, below 40%.

Receivable days vs history+6 daysWithin range

Debtor days are above the median of the previous three fiscal years by 6 days (48 vs 42). Bands: under 15 days, 15 to 45, over 45.

Capital work in progress17% of fixed assetsWithin range

Capital work-in-progress is 17% of fixed assets. Bands: not rising or up to 30%; rising for three years and above 30%; rising and above 60%.

Payable days-52 days / 2 yrsWithin range

Days payable changed by -52 over two years. Bands: rise of up to 30 days; more than 30 days.

Tap a check to see how it is measured

How to read this

Each check is a named rule with fixed thresholds, not a score. Annual statements are the latest restated figures, so a past year may differ from what was originally reported.

All terms explained in the glossary →

Who has been buying and selling?

  • Over 2 years, institutional and promoter holdings were broadly unchanged.

Holdings, Jun '26

How each group changed

GroupDec '23Jun '26Change
Promoters74.7%75.0%+0.3 pts
FIIs0.0%0.0%0.0 pts
DIIs0.0%0.1%0.0 pts
Public and others25.3%25.0%-0.3 pts

Number of shareholders

47,079shareholders-1% since Dec '23
47k48k49k50k Dec '23Jun '24Dec '24Jun '25Dec '25Jun '26
Dec '23: 47,503
Mar '24: 49,546
Jun '24: 48,395
Sep '24: 47,703
Dec '24: 47,138
Mar '25: 46,903
Jun '25: 46,921
Sep '25: 47,623
Dec '25: 47,680
Mar '26: 47,366
Jun '26: 47,079
47k48k49k50k Dec '23Dec '24Dec '25Jun '26
Dec '23: 47,503
Mar '24: 49,546
Jun '24: 48,395
Sep '24: 47,703
Dec '24: 47,138
Mar '25: 46,903
Jun '25: 46,921
Sep '25: 47,623
Dec '25: 47,680
Mar '26: 47,366
Jun '26: 47,079

Quarterly shareholding as reported, labelled by the quarter it covers (it becomes visible about two months later).
Shareholder counts are only available for recent quarters.

This quarter's smart-money board

What happened next to similar setups

−4.7%typical 12-month return vs the marketNot meaningfully different from the base rate
  • We found 50 past situations where a non-financial company looked like LORDS CHLORO ALKALI LTD today on valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, price momentum, size and volatility.
  • Over the following 12 months the middle half of them returned −25% to +34% vs the market, against −3% for all non-financial companies in the same months.
  • The gap against the base rate (−2.2%, 80% range −7.8% to +2.7%) is within what chance and overlapping periods produce.

Where the 50 outcomes landed

−100%−50%0%+50%+100%
AVG · Jan 2025: −56.4% vs market
NACLIND · Oct 2023: −48.8% vs market
DHAMPURSUG · Dec 2023: −45.8% vs market
FOODSIN · Apr 2024: −44.9% vs market
WTICAB · Jul 2025: −42.7% vs market
AFSL · Sep 2024: −42.1% vs market
DBOL · Oct 2023: −38.5% vs market
CONFIPET · Jul 2024: −37.5% vs market
THEINVEST · Oct 2025: −35.6% vs market
NAVA · Jan 2020: −32.0% vs market
KANPRPLA · Jun 2022: −30.4% vs market
SATIA · May 2023: −30.2% vs market
MMFL · Dec 2024: −26.2% vs market
RAMANEWS · Feb 2020: −22.2% vs market
SHIGAN · Jul 2025: −21.1% vs market
BODALCHEM · Aug 2022: −19.2% vs market
HARIOMPIPE · Mar 2025: −15.2% vs market
DOLLEX · Apr 2024: −13.5% vs market
GREENPOWER · Aug 2020: −10.8% vs market
PARACABLES · Apr 2020: −9.1% vs market
SARLAPOLY · Oct 2022: −8.8% vs market
RPPL · Jul 2023: −7.6% vs market
AEROENTER · May 2024: −7.4% vs market
WELENT · Aug 2020: −6.3% vs market
NIPPOBATRY · Nov 2021: −5.6% vs market
APOLSINHOT · Dec 2023: −3.8% vs market
RICOAUTO · Feb 2020: −3.7% vs market
HIMATSEIDE · Jan 2020: −2.3% vs market
AXISCADES · Sep 2020: −0.7% vs market
PRITIKAUTO · Sep 2025: +1.2% vs market
UNIVCABLES · Jun 2020: +3.5% vs market
SANGAMIND · May 2023: +8.7% vs market
TALBROAUTO · Jan 2020: +11.4% vs market
INDOAMIN · May 2024: +15.7% vs market
AWHCL · May 2023: +23.2% vs market
RBZJEWEL · Oct 2025: +23.4% vs market
ALICON · Mar 2020: +34.0% vs market
SANGHIIND · Apr 2022: +34.4% vs market
MANGLMCEM · Aug 2020: +39.7% vs market
SPAL · Dec 2022: +46.8% vs market
LIBERTSHOE · Feb 2022: +50.7% vs market
MIRZAINT · Dec 2020: +63.3% vs market
DURLAX · Sep 2025: +76.3% vs market
BLKASHYAP · Jun 2022: +88.9% vs market
ASAL · May 2023: +90.5% vs market
RKFORGE · Mar 2020: +90.8% vs market
TIIL · Jul 2020: +95.6% vs market
SALASAR · Mar 2022: +97.0% vs market
SHAKTIPUMP · Mar 2020: +143.7% vs market
SALZERELEC · Jan 2024: +174.0% vs market
Similar setups −4.7%All companies −2.5%← worse than the marketbetter than the market →

Each dot is one past situation (hover or tap for details) · Solid dots are the closest matches, listed below · Shaded is the middle half of all companies in the same months · 2 beyond the range shown, drawn at the edge

Similar setups' median
−4.7%
All companies' median
−2.5%
Beat the market
42% vs 47%

50 past situations · 50 companies · 32 months · 2020–2025

The closest matches

CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
TALBROAUTO
Producer Manufacturing
Jan 2020 6x15% −35%−44% +11%
SATIA
Process Industries
May 2023 11x16% −6%−28% −30%
RKFORGE
Producer Manufacturing
Mar 2020 4x16% −71%−72% +91%
AVG
Transportation
Jan 2025 14x15% −20%−48% −56%
BODALCHEM
Process Industries
Aug 2022 11x12% −12%−37% −19%
Show the other 3 matches
CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
FOODSIN
Consumer Non-Durables
Apr 2024 17x17% +13%−28% −45%
SANGHIIND
Non-Energy Minerals
Apr 2022 16x6% +6%−39% +34%
RAMANEWS
Process Industries
Feb 2020 5x9% −37%−44% −22%
How reliable is this?

Matched on P/E, P/S, ROCE, operating margin, debt/equity, interest cover, revenue growth, 12-month momentum, drawdown from 12-month high, size and volatility. Closest on: 12-month momentum, interest cover and drawdown from 12-month high. One match per company and at most 7 from any one month.

Independent periods: the matches fall in 5 distinct 12-month windows. Matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, so fewer windows means less evidence.

How this is built

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to LORDS CHLORO ALKALI LTD. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

Methodology

How historical analogs are built

Data as of 2026-11-09. Outcome pool: Jan 2020 to Oct 2025.

For every company we look at the situation it is in today (valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, 12-month price momentum, drawdown, size and volatility) and find past company-months that looked most like it. We then show what happened to those past situations over the following 12 months, measured against the ApnaFunda All index and against the base rate. It describes history. It does not predict anything.

What is compared

FeatureWeightNon-financialFinancial
P/E1yesyes
P/S1yes—
P/B1—yes
ROCE1yes—
operating margin1yes—
ROE1—yes
debt/equity0.75yes—
interest cover0.5yes—
revenue growth0.75yesyes
12-month momentum1yesyes
drawdown from 12-month high0.75yesyes
size0.75yesyes
volatility0.5yesyes

Weights were set by judgement before any outcome was looked at and are never tuned on results. Loss-making companies (negative P/E or net profit) are only matched with other loss-making companies. Banks, NBFCs and insurers are compared only with each other and use a different feature set. Every feature is converted, month by month, to its rank among companies in the same pool in that month, so a P/E of 30 in a hot market and a P/E of 22 in a cold one can match if both were equally expensive for their time. Only that month's data is used.

How closeness and the sample are defined

Distance is the weighted root-mean-square gap between the standardised features both companies have. A match needs at least 70% of the query's feature weight, a distance of at most 0.9, and 30 matches at minimum to be shown. We keep up to 50 matches with these exclusions: never the company itself, one match per company (its closest month), and at most 7 from any one calendar month so a single market episode cannot dominate.

Base rate

The base rate is the distribution of 12-month returns, relative to the market, of every eligible company-month in the same pool, with each month weighted to match the months the analogs came from. It answers: how did a random company do in these same months? Because matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, we also report the number of distinct 12-month windows behind a result, and a bootstrap that resamples months decides whether the analog median differs from the base rate at all. "Not meaningfully different" is the usual outcome and the page copy is written for it.

Limits you should know

  • One market period. The outcome pool covers 2020–2025 only (70 months), including the 2020 crash and the 2020–21 rally.
  • Survivorship. Only companies listed today are included. Delisted and bankrupt companies are missing, which flatters past outcomes, particularly for distressed-looking setups.
  • Price return only. Dividends are excluded, and the benchmark is an ApnaFunda market-cap-weighted index of the same listed companies, not an official index.
  • Reporting lag. Fundamentals are matched on an assumed 60-day lag after the quarter end, not on real announcement dates.
  • Pools: non-financial: 98,395 company-months from 2019 companies; financial: 5,659 company-months from 108 companies. 2349 companies currently have a result; the rest are suppressed because too few comparable situations exist.

Does it work? A walk-forward check

The walk-forward check has not been run for this build, so skill is shown as not yet measured.

Disclaimer

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to any company shown. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

What changed?

16 events since Mar '24

  1. SepPeer rankMoved into the top quartile of Process Industries on operating margin (from the 2nd quartile).
  2. JunPeer rankMoved into the 2nd quartile of Process Industries on ROCE (from the bottom quartile).
  3. JunSharesShare count is up 16.0% over 12 months.
  4. MarResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned positive.
  5. MarPriceFell 52% from the Jul 2025 peak to the Mar 2026 low.
  6. MarPeer rankSlipped to the 2nd quartile of Process Industries on operating margin (from the top quartile).
  7. SepResultsRevenue (TTM) reached a new high of ₹306 cr.
  8. SepPeer rankMoved into the top quartile of Process Industries on operating margin (from the 2nd quartile).
Show 8 earlier events
  1. JulPriceRegained the 2025-01 peak, 4 months after the low.
  2. JunPeer rankMoved into the 2nd quartile of Process Industries on operating margin (from the 3rd quartile).
  3. MarResultsEPS (TTM) turned positive.
  4. MarPriceFell 40% from the Jan 2025 peak to the Mar 2025 low.
  5. JanPriceRegained the 2023-08 peak, 10 months after the low.
  6. JunResultsEPS (TTM) turned negative.
  7. JunPeer rankSlipped to the bottom quartile of Process Industries on ROCE (from the top quartile).
  8. MarPriceFell 43% from the Aug 2023 peak to the Mar 2024 low.

Events are generated from the data by fixed rules.
The month shown is when the change became visible in the reported figures, assuming a 60-day lag after each quarter end; it is not an announcement date.

Where price and fundamentals disagree, market-wide Rewind the whole market to any month

Monthly history40 months · 2023-08 to 2026-11
MonthP/ERevenue (TTM)ROEROCEDebt / Equity
2026-1110.6x₹396 cr14.3%13.0%0.7x
2026-1010.8x₹396 cr14.3%13.0%0.7x
2026-0911.4x₹396 cr14.3%13.0%0.7x
2026-0812.2x₹390 cr12.2%13.0%0.7x
2026-0713.0x₹390 cr12.2%13.0%0.7x
2026-0612.1x₹390 cr12.2%13.0%0.7x
2026-0513.6x₹372 cr15.7%5.0%0.7x
2026-0413.6x₹372 cr15.7%5.0%0.7x
2026-0310.3x₹372 cr15.7%5.0%0.7x
2026-0213.5x₹343 cr13.3%5.0%0.7x
2026-0115.3x₹343 cr13.3%5.0%0.7x
2025-1218.3x₹343 cr13.3%5.0%0.7x
2025-1131.7x₹306 cr8.1%5.0%0.7x
2025-1035.4x₹306 cr8.1%5.0%0.7x
2025-0929.5x₹306 cr8.1%5.0%0.7x
2025-0870.4x₹271 cr3.5%5.0%0.7x
2025-0790.5x₹271 cr3.5%5.0%0.7x
2025-0663.9x₹271 cr3.5%5.0%0.7x
2025-05120.5x₹253 cr2.1%-3.0%0.3x
2025-04104.1x₹253 cr2.1%-3.0%0.3x
2025-0392.8x₹253 cr2.1%-3.0%0.3x
2025-02—₹246 cr-0.6%-3.0%0.3x
2025-01—₹246 cr-0.6%-3.0%0.3x
2024-12—₹246 cr-0.6%-3.0%0.3x
2024-11—₹233 cr-1.5%-3.0%0.3x
2024-10—₹233 cr-1.5%-3.0%0.3x
2024-09—₹233 cr-1.5%-3.0%0.3x
2024-08—₹220 cr-2.9%-3.0%0.3x
2024-07—₹220 cr-2.9%-3.0%0.3x
2024-06—₹220 cr-2.9%-3.0%0.3x
2024-055.7x₹295 cr33.1%44.0%0.1x
2024-046.2x₹295 cr33.1%44.0%0.1x
2024-035.3x₹295 cr33.1%44.0%0.1x
2024-026.0x₹295 cr33.1%44.0%0.1x
2024-016.7x₹295 cr33.1%44.0%0.1x
2023-128.0x₹295 cr33.1%44.0%0.1x
2023-116.9x₹295 cr33.1%44.0%0.1x
2023-107.4x₹295 cr33.1%44.0%0.1x
2023-097.9x₹295 cr33.1%44.0%0.1x
2023-088.6x₹295 cr33.1%44.0%0.1x

Methodology and data notes

Methodology

Methodology and data notes

All figures come from public exchange prices and screener.in financial statements. Quarterly and annual results are shown from 60 days after the period end, so a month never uses a result before it would plausibly have been published. Statements are the latest versions, which may include later restatements.

Sector medians, percentiles and indices use today's listed companies in the sector (survivorship bias). Prices are adjusted for splits and bonus issues; around a corporate action the fundamentals may lag the price by up to a month, and affected sections are hidden.

The return decomposition uses price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count. The reverse DCF uses a fixed 12% cost of equity, a 10-year horizon and a 15x terminal P/E, and is an illustration only. Events, flags and twins follow fixed rules and thresholds described next to each section.

Feedback