अApnaFunda
Menu

MANAKSIA LIMITED (MANAKSIA)

Non-Energy Minerals · Steel · figures to Nov '26

Quality scoreHow the business itself ranks against its sector peers on profitability, 3-year growth and leverage. 50 is the middle of the sector.51 / 100
Profitability 39Growth 13Balance sheet 100

Passes these screensValue Pick

Compare withJSW STEELTATA STEELJINDAL STEEL

Share price

Closing priceAdjusted for splits and bonus issues.

₹60.69 latest close · +4.1% over the last 90 sessions

₹50₹60₹70Jul 3Jul 29Aug 24Sep 17Oct 14Nov 9 ₹50₹60₹70Jul 3Sep 4Nov 9

₹60.69 month-end · −4.8% over 12 months

₹50₹60Nov '25Jan '26Apr '26Jun '26Sep '26Nov '26 ₹50₹60Nov '25May '26Nov '26

₹60.69 month-end · −54.0% over 3 years

₹50₹100Nov '23Jun '24Jan '25Sep '25Apr '26Nov '26 ₹50₹100Nov '23May '25Nov '26

₹60.69 month-end · +70.5% since Jan '19

₹50₹100₹150Jan '19Aug '20Mar '22Sep '23Apr '25Nov '26 ₹50₹100₹150Jan '19Dec '22Nov '26

52-week range ₹42.10 to ₹73.40 · 1-year volatility 41.5%

Was the rally earned?

-5%share price, 1 yearRoughly flat
  • The share price was roughly flat over 1 year (-5%).
  • The share count barely moved.
Net profit growth: +15 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+15 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: −20 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−20 ptsP/E changeShare count change: 0 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.0 ptsShare count changeShare price: −5%−5%Share priceNet profit growth: +15 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+15ProfitP/E change: −20 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−20P/EShare count change: 0 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.0SharesShare price: −5%−5%Share price
Net profit growth+15 ptsNet profit rose about 16%, which lifts the price.
P/E change-20 ptsThe P/E fell from 7.7x to 6.3x, which lowers the price.
Share count change0 ptsShare count was little changed. More shares would count against the price.
-54%share price, 3 yearsEarnings-driven

Mostly earnings.

  • Per-share earnings took off 37 points, while the multiple moved less (P/E 8.1x to 6.3x).
  • The share count barely moved.
Net profit growth: −38 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).−38 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: −17 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−17 ptsP/E changeShare count change: +1 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.+1 ptsShare count changeShare price: −54%−54%Share priceNet profit growth: −38 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).−38ProfitP/E change: −17 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−17P/EShare count change: +1 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.+1SharesShare price: −54%−54%Share price
Net profit growth-38 ptsNet profit fell about 42%, which lowers the price.
P/E change-17 ptsThe P/E fell from 8.1x to 6.3x, which lowers the price.
Share count change+1 ptsShare count was little changed. More shares would count against the price.
+2%share price, 5 yearsRoughly flat
  • The share price was roughly flat over 5 years (+2%).
  • The share count fell 8%.
Net profit growth: −3 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).−3 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: −3 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−3 ptsP/E changeShare count change: +9 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.+9 ptsShare count changeShare price: +2%+2%Share priceNet profit growth: −3 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).−3ProfitP/E change: −3 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−3P/EShare count change: +9 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.+9SharesShare price: +2%+2%Share price
Net profit growth-3 ptsNet profit fell about 3%, which lowers the price.
P/E change-3 ptsThe P/E fell from 6.6x to 6.3x, which lowers the price.
Share count change+9 ptsShare count fell 8%, which lifts the price.
What do "pts" mean?

"pts" are percentage points of the share price return. The parts add up to the total shown for each period. Because price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count, higher profit pushes the price up, a higher P/E pushes it up, and more shares push it down.

Example: if the price rose 34% and profit growth accounts for +58 pts while a lower P/E accounts for -24 pts, then 58 - 24 = 34. The +58 is not the profit growth rate itself: it is the part of the price move that profit growth explains.

Net profit is trailing twelve months as reported with a 60-day lag.

Compare this with JSW STEEL

How rough has the ride been?

Maximum drawdown-77.2%not yet recovered
1-year volatility41.5%annualised

Drawdown from peak

0%−25%−50%−75%2020202120222023202420252026−75.7% 0%−25%−50%−75%2020202220242026−75.7%
Largest drawdowns

-77.2% (2023-06 peak to 2026-03 low, not yet recovered)

-47.6% (2020-03 peak to 2020-03 low, recovered 2020-12)

-32.8% (2023-02 peak to 2023-03 low, recovered 2023-05)

Is it expensive against its own past and its peers?

6.3xP/E todayWithin its usual range
Against its own history47th percentile
CheapestMedian 6.6xDearest

Usual range 2.7x to 8.6x since 2019-01.

Against Non-Energy Minerals6.3x vs 21.8x
This company
6.3x
Sector median
21.8x

71% below the Non-Energy Minerals median.

2.3x11.8x21.3x30.9xJan '19Aug '20Mar '22Oct '23May '25Nov '262.3x11.8x21.3x30.9xJan '19Sep '21May '24Nov '26
P/E (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianNon-Energy Minerals median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/B (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianNon-Energy Minerals median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/S (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianNon-Energy Minerals median
How to read this

Shaded band: 10th to 90th percentile of the company's own P/E history; dotted line: its median; orange line: sector median (companies with a positive multiple, at least 5 in the sector).

Sector figures are built from today's listed companies, so they exclude companies that are no longer listed.

All terms explained in the glossary →

How Non-Energy Minerals is valued

Where does it rank among Non-Energy Minerals peers?

Each cell is the company's percentile rank among its Non-Energy Minerals peers (non-financial companies) that month.
Darker is better-ranked.
Rows marked ↓ are inverted (lower debt, shorter cash cycle and a lower P/E rank higher).

Where it ranks today

  • ROCE47th▼ 7 pts vs a year ago
  • Op. margin32nd▲ 11 pts vs a year ago
  • Revenue growth35th▼ 58 pts vs a year ago
  • EPS growth60th▲ 28 pts vs a year ago
  • Debt/equity ↓87thflat vs a year ago
  • Cash cycle ↓70th▲ 7 pts vs a year ago
  • P/E ↓96thflat vs a year ago
  • 12M momentum59th▲ 39 pts vs a year ago

Rank history

ROCE
Op. margin
Revenue growth
EPS growth
Debt/equity ↓
Cash cycle ↓
P/E ↓
12M momentum
Dec '21Jul '22Jan '23Jul '23Jan '24Jul '24Jan '25Jul '25Jan '26Jul '26Nov '26
Lower rank Higher rank Not enough data

Percentiles use today's listed companies in the sector and need at least 5 peers with a value; grey cells have too few.
ROE is computed from net profit and book value where the source does not report it.

The Non-Energy Minerals sector page Watch it move against Non-Energy Minerals in the Observatory

What is the price implying?

~-1%annual earnings growth implied by the price

At a P/E of 4.2x, the price would imply about −1.4%/yr earnings growth for 10 years under the same assumptions, but it is not ranked.

Below the ₹1,000 cr market-cap floor used for the lists.

“Implied growth” is what the current price would require under our stated assumptions, not what we expect.

What prices imply across Non-Energy Minerals The market-wide Expectations lists

Key figures

Share Priceclose 9 Nov
₹60.69
P/E
6.3x
ROCE
10.0%
Market Cap
₹397 cr
Revenue (TTM)
₹834 cr
P/S
0.5x
P/B
0.5x
ROE
8.7%
Operating Margin
7.0%
Debt / Equity
0.0x
Promoter Holding
74.9%
12M Momentum
-4.8%

52-week range

₹42.10₹73.40
59% of the way from its 52-week low to its high

Price risk

1Y volatility
41.5%
Beta vs sector
1-year daily
0.82

Balance sheet & cash

Interest cover
operating profit ÷ interest
18.0x
Cash from profit, 3Y
operating cash flow ÷ net profit
-0.79x
low
Share count, 1Y
unchanged

Are profits backed by cash?

3 of 7checks within range3 beyond a threshold
Other income reliance56%Beyond threshold

Other income as a share of pre-tax profit (trailing twelve months): 55.8%. Bands: below 15%, 15% to 35%, above 35%.

Tax rate29%Within range

Median quarterly effective tax rate over about 2.5 years: 29.0%. Bands: 15% to 35%, 5% to 15% or 35% to 50%, outside 5% to 50%.

Cash conversion-0.79xBeyond threshold

Operating cash flow divided by net profit over the last three fiscal years: -0.79x (cash from operations ₹-151 cr, net profit ₹190 cr). Bands: 0.8x and above, 0.5x to 0.8x, below 0.5x.

Free cash flow3 of 5 yrsNear threshold

Fiscal years with positive free cash flow in the last 5: 3. Bands: at least 80% of years, 40% to 80%, below 40%.

Receivable days vs history0 daysWithin range

Debtor days are below the median of the previous three fiscal years by 0 days (33 vs 33). Bands: under 15 days, 15 to 45, over 45.

Capital work in progress94% of fixed assetsBeyond threshold

Capital work-in-progress is 94% of fixed assets. Bands: not rising or up to 30%; rising for three years and above 30%; rising and above 60%.

Payable days+7 days / 2 yrsWithin range

Days payable changed by +7 over two years. Bands: rise of up to 30 days; more than 30 days.

Tap a check to see how it is measured

How to read this

Each check is a named rule with fixed thresholds, not a score. Annual statements are the latest restated figures, so a past year may differ from what was originally reported.

All terms explained in the glossary →

Who has been buying and selling?

  • Over 2 years, FIIs trimmed 0.8 pts.

Holdings, Jun '26

How each group changed

GroupDec '23Jun '26Change
Promoters74.9%74.9%0.0 pts
FIIs1.7%0.9%-0.8 pts
DIIs———
Public and others23.3%23.9%+0.6 pts

Number of shareholders

33,456shareholders-2% since Dec '23
33k35k36k38k Dec '23Jun '24Dec '24Sep '25Mar '26Jun '26
Dec '23: 34,239
Mar '24: 35,987
Jun '24: 36,288
Sep '24: 37,755
Dec '24: 37,427
Jun '25: 36,033
Sep '25: 35,726
Dec '25: 34,894
Mar '26: 34,293
Jun '26: 33,456
 33k35k36k38k Dec '23Sep '24Sep '25Jun '26
Dec '23: 34,239
Mar '24: 35,987
Jun '24: 36,288
Sep '24: 37,755
Dec '24: 37,427
Jun '25: 36,033
Sep '25: 35,726
Dec '25: 34,894
Mar '26: 34,293
Jun '26: 33,456

Quarterly shareholding as reported, labelled by the quarter it covers (it becomes visible about two months later).
Shareholder counts are only available for recent quarters.

This quarter's smart-money board

What happened next to similar setups

−6.1%typical 12-month return vs the marketNot meaningfully different from the base rate
  • We found 50 past situations where a non-financial company looked like MANAKSIA LIMITED today on valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, price momentum, size and volatility.
  • Over the following 12 months the middle half of them returned −20% to +30% vs the market, against −8% for all non-financial companies in the same months.
  • The gap against the base rate (+1.9%, 80% range −4.3% to +10.1%) is within what chance and overlapping periods produce.

Where the 50 outcomes landed

−100%−50%0%+50%+100%
NRAIL · Apr 2024: −49.5% vs market
NIRAJ · Jan 2025: −48.3% vs market
PONNIERODE · Jul 2024: −42.1% vs market
GTPL · Feb 2024: −41.3% vs market
ALPA · Apr 2025: −39.9% vs market
SHREYANIND · Oct 2025: −39.5% vs market
PLASTIBLEN · Jul 2024: −36.8% vs market
CENTENKA · Dec 2024: −33.0% vs market
PODDARMENT · Jan 2025: −32.2% vs market
PRAKASH · Oct 2025: −27.7% vs market
DALMIASUG · Nov 2023: −25.5% vs market
NATHBIOGEN · Jun 2025: −20.7% vs market
TRIGYN · May 2023: −19.8% vs market
SESHAPAPER · Aug 2025: −19.8% vs market
SCHAND · Sep 2025: −19.7% vs market
EKC · Jul 2024: −19.1% vs market
ASPINWALL · May 2025: −16.5% vs market
RUBFILA · Aug 2025: −16.3% vs market
CLSEL · Oct 2024: −15.1% vs market
JMA · Jun 2025: −12.5% vs market
BLISSGVS · Aug 2023: −12.2% vs market
KNAGRI · Aug 2025: −11.7% vs market
HMVL · Sep 2025: −9.9% vs market
TNPETRO · Jul 2025: −7.6% vs market
SCI · Sep 2021: −6.4% vs market
PTL · Aug 2024: −5.7% vs market
JAYAGROGN · May 2024: −0.7% vs market
DTIL · May 2021: +0.3% vs market
GSFC · Jan 2022: +1.4% vs market
VETO · Oct 2025: +4.0% vs market
GHCLTEXTIL · Apr 2025: +5.3% vs market
PASUPTAC · Feb 2025: +12.9% vs market
EVERESTIND · Jul 2021: +12.9% vs market
BALMLAWRIE · Nov 2023: +13.2% vs market
WSTCSTPAPR · Aug 2025: +13.9% vs market
JAGRAN · Nov 2022: +16.0% vs market
SUPERHOUSE · Oct 2021: +25.3% vs market
GIPCL · May 2023: +32.1% vs market
VINDHYATEL · Jan 2022: +34.6% vs market
INSECTICID · Jun 2024: +36.9% vs market
KIRLOSIND · Dec 2020: +37.6% vs market
PDMJEPAPER · Jan 2021: +37.7% vs market
RUCHIRA · May 2021: +41.4% vs market
IFGLEXPOR · May 2023: +44.0% vs market
SHREEPUSHK · Oct 2024: +49.9% vs market
ALBERTDAVD · Jun 2023: +56.0% vs market
IMFA · Jun 2023: +57.9% vs market
IZMO · Feb 2023: +139.9% vs market
MANALIPETC · Jun 2020: +172.8% vs market
MANINDS · Apr 2023: +188.6% vs market
Similar setups −6.1%All companies −8.0%← worse than the marketbetter than the market →

Each dot is one past situation (hover or tap for details) · Solid dots are the closest matches, listed below · Shaded is the middle half of all companies in the same months · 3 beyond the range shown, drawn at the edge

Similar setups' median
−6.1%
All companies' median
−8.0%
Beat the market
46% vs 41%

50 past situations · 50 companies · 32 months · 2020–2025

The closest matches

CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
HMVL
Consumer Services		 Sep 2025 7x11% −12%−16% −10%
VETO
Producer Manufacturing		 Oct 2025 11x11% −12%−17% +4%
ASPINWALL
Transportation		 May 2025 12x7% +8%−14% −17%
SHREYANIND
Process Industries		 Oct 2025 6x16% −7%−13% −40%
GHCLTEXTIL
Process Industries		 Apr 2025 15x6% −4%−32% +5%
Show the other 3 matches
CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
IZMO
Technology Services		 Feb 2023 7x7% −3%−17% +140%
MANINDS
Producer Manufacturing		 Apr 2023 6x16% +2%−6% +189%
TRIGYN
Technology Services		 May 2023 8x10% −5%−13% −20%
How reliable is this?

Matched on P/E, P/S, ROCE, operating margin, debt/equity, interest cover, revenue growth, 12-month momentum, drawdown from 12-month high, size and volatility. Closest on: 12-month momentum, drawdown from 12-month high and volatility. One match per company and at most 7 from any one month.

Independent periods: the matches fall in 5 distinct 12-month windows. Matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, so fewer windows means less evidence.

How this is built

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to MANAKSIA LIMITED. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

Methodology

How historical analogs are built

Data as of 2026-11-09. Outcome pool: Jan 2020 to Oct 2025.

For every company we look at the situation it is in today (valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, 12-month price momentum, drawdown, size and volatility) and find past company-months that looked most like it. We then show what happened to those past situations over the following 12 months, measured against the ApnaFunda All index and against the base rate. It describes history. It does not predict anything.

What is compared

FeatureWeightNon-financialFinancial
P/E1yesyes
P/S1yes—
P/B1—yes
ROCE1yes—
operating margin1yes—
ROE1—yes
debt/equity0.75yes—
interest cover0.5yes—
revenue growth0.75yesyes
12-month momentum1yesyes
drawdown from 12-month high0.75yesyes
size0.75yesyes
volatility0.5yesyes

Weights were set by judgement before any outcome was looked at and are never tuned on results. Loss-making companies (negative P/E or net profit) are only matched with other loss-making companies. Banks, NBFCs and insurers are compared only with each other and use a different feature set. Every feature is converted, month by month, to its rank among companies in the same pool in that month, so a P/E of 30 in a hot market and a P/E of 22 in a cold one can match if both were equally expensive for their time. Only that month's data is used.

How closeness and the sample are defined

Distance is the weighted root-mean-square gap between the standardised features both companies have. A match needs at least 70% of the query's feature weight, a distance of at most 0.9, and 30 matches at minimum to be shown. We keep up to 50 matches with these exclusions: never the company itself, one match per company (its closest month), and at most 7 from any one calendar month so a single market episode cannot dominate.

Base rate

The base rate is the distribution of 12-month returns, relative to the market, of every eligible company-month in the same pool, with each month weighted to match the months the analogs came from. It answers: how did a random company do in these same months? Because matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, we also report the number of distinct 12-month windows behind a result, and a bootstrap that resamples months decides whether the analog median differs from the base rate at all. "Not meaningfully different" is the usual outcome and the page copy is written for it.

Limits you should know

  • One market period. The outcome pool covers 2020–2025 only (70 months), including the 2020 crash and the 2020–21 rally.
  • Survivorship. Only companies listed today are included. Delisted and bankrupt companies are missing, which flatters past outcomes, particularly for distressed-looking setups.
  • Price return only. Dividends are excluded, and the benchmark is an ApnaFunda market-cap-weighted index of the same listed companies, not an official index.
  • Reporting lag. Fundamentals are matched on an assumed 60-day lag after the quarter end, not on real announcement dates.
  • Pools: non-financial: 98,395 company-months from 2019 companies; financial: 5,659 company-months from 108 companies. 2349 companies currently have a result; the rest are suppressed because too few comparable situations exist.

Does it work? A walk-forward check

The walk-forward check has not been run for this build, so skill is shown as not yet measured.

Disclaimer

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to any company shown. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

What changed?

30 events since Feb '20

  1. SepResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned positive.
  2. SepPeer rankMoved into the 2nd quartile of Non-Energy Minerals on EPS growth (from the 3rd quartile).
  3. JunPeer rankSlipped to the 3rd quartile of Non-Energy Minerals on ROCE (from the 2nd quartile).
  4. MarPriceFell 77% from the Jun 2023 peak to the Mar 2026 low.
  5. JunValuationP/E crossed above the 90th percentile of its own history to date (8.7x).
  6. JunPeer rankSlipped to the bottom quartile of Non-Energy Minerals on operating margin (from the 3rd quartile).
  7. MarPeer rankMoved into the 3rd quartile of Non-Energy Minerals on operating margin (from the bottom quartile).
  8. DecPeer rankSlipped to the bottom quartile of Non-Energy Minerals on operating margin (from the 2nd quartile).
Show 22 earlier events
  1. JunValuationP/E crossed above the 90th percentile of its own history to date (8.4x).
  2. JunPeer rankSlipped to the bottom quartile of Non-Energy Minerals on EPS growth (from the 3rd quartile).
  3. JunDividendDividend payout cut from 18% to 0% of profit.
  4. JunResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned negative.
  5. JunValuationP/E crossed above the 90th percentile of its own history to date (10.1x).
  6. JunPeer rankSlipped to the 3rd quartile of Non-Energy Minerals on EPS growth (from the top quartile).
  7. MayPriceRegained the 2023-02 peak, 2 months after the low.
  8. MarPriceFell 33% from the Feb 2023 peak to the Mar 2023 low.
  9. JanPriceRegained the 2022-04 peak, 7 months after the low.
  10. JunResultsRevenue (TTM) reached a new high of ₹1,174 cr.
  11. JunPriceFell 32% from the Apr 2022 peak to the Jun 2022 low.
  12. JunPeer rankMoved into the 2nd quartile of Non-Energy Minerals on ROCE (from the 3rd quartile).
  13. JunDividendDividend payout cut from 33% to 11% of profit.
  14. DecValuationP/E crossed above the 90th percentile of its own history to date (8.6x).
  15. JunResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned positive.
  16. JunPeer rankSlipped to the 3rd quartile of Non-Energy Minerals on ROCE (from the 2nd quartile).
  17. JunDividendDividend payout cut from 117% to 33% of profit.
  18. JanValuationP/E crossed above the 90th percentile of its own history to date (5.7x).
  19. DecPriceRegained the 2020-03 peak, 9 months after the low.
  20. JunPeer rankMoved into the 2nd quartile of Non-Energy Minerals on ROCE (from the 3rd quartile).
  21. MarPriceFell 48% from the Mar 2020 peak to the Mar 2020 low.
  22. FebPriceRegained the 2019-01 peak, 6 months after the low.

Events are generated from the data by fixed rules.
The month shown is when the change became visible in the reported figures, assuming a 60-day lag after each quarter end; it is not an announcement date.

Where price and fundamentals disagree, market-wide Rewind the whole market to any month

Monthly history95 months · 2019-01 to 2026-11
MonthP/ERevenue (TTM)ROEROCEDebt / Equity
2026-116.3x₹834 cr8.7%10.0%0.0x
2026-105.5x₹834 cr8.9%10.0%0.0x
2026-096.3x₹834 cr8.9%10.0%0.0x
2026-087.4x₹784 cr7.2%10.0%0.0x
2026-077.0x₹784 cr7.2%10.0%0.0x
2026-067.3x₹784 cr7.2%10.0%0.0x
2026-058.0x₹816 cr8.9%12.0%0.0x
2026-047.4x₹816 cr8.9%12.0%0.0x
2026-035.4x₹816 cr8.9%12.0%0.0x
2026-027.8x₹820 cr8.6%12.0%0.0x
2026-018.3x₹820 cr8.6%12.0%0.0x
2025-128.4x₹820 cr8.6%12.0%0.0x
2025-117.7x₹799 cr9.4%12.0%0.0x
2025-108.2x₹799 cr9.4%12.0%0.0x
2025-098.2x₹799 cr9.4%12.0%0.0x
2025-088.1x₹731 cr10.1%12.0%0.0x
2025-078.9x₹731 cr10.1%12.0%0.0x
2025-068.7x₹731 cr10.1%12.0%0.0x
2025-057.7x₹577 cr11.3%14.0%0.1x
2025-047.3x₹577 cr11.3%14.0%0.1x
2025-036.5x₹577 cr11.3%14.0%0.1x
2025-027.0x₹541 cr12.0%14.0%0.1x
2025-018.6x₹541 cr12.0%14.0%0.1x
2024-128.7x₹541 cr12.0%14.0%0.1x
2024-118.8x₹571 cr13.6%14.0%0.1x
2024-108.6x₹571 cr13.6%14.0%0.1x
2024-0910.0x₹571 cr13.6%14.0%0.1x
2024-088.5x₹702 cr14.2%14.0%0.1x
2024-078.5x₹702 cr14.2%14.0%0.1x
2024-068.4x₹702 cr14.2%14.0%0.1x
2024-056.2x₹1165 cr9.6%12.0%0.1x
2024-047.2x₹1165 cr9.6%12.0%0.1x
2024-036.0x₹1165 cr9.6%12.0%0.1x
2024-027.5x₹1165 cr9.6%12.0%0.1x
2024-018.2x₹1165 cr9.6%12.0%0.1x
2023-128.1x₹1165 cr9.6%12.0%0.1x
2023-118.1x₹1165 cr9.6%12.0%0.1x
2023-108.3x₹1165 cr9.6%12.0%0.1x
2023-098.7x₹1165 cr9.6%12.0%0.1x
2023-088.2x₹1165 cr9.6%12.0%0.1x
2023-078.3x₹1165 cr9.6%12.0%0.1x
2023-0610.1x₹1165 cr9.6%12.0%0.1x
2023-056.0x₹1174 cr17.5%23.0%0.1x
2023-044.6x₹1174 cr17.5%23.0%0.1x
2023-033.8x₹1174 cr17.5%23.0%0.1x
2023-024.3x₹1174 cr17.5%23.0%0.1x
2023-014.0x₹1174 cr17.5%23.0%0.1x
2022-122.7x₹1174 cr17.5%23.0%0.1x
2022-112.7x₹1174 cr17.5%23.0%0.1x
2022-102.8x₹1174 cr17.5%23.0%0.1x
2022-092.8x₹1174 cr17.5%23.0%0.1x
2022-082.7x₹1174 cr17.5%23.0%0.1x
2022-072.9x₹1174 cr17.5%23.0%0.1x
2022-062.7x₹1174 cr17.5%23.0%0.1x
2022-059.6x₹861 cr6.8%9.0%0.1x
2022-0410.2x₹861 cr6.8%9.0%0.1x
2022-038.1x₹861 cr6.8%9.0%0.1x
2022-028.0x₹861 cr6.8%9.0%0.1x
2022-018.2x₹861 cr6.8%9.0%0.1x
2021-128.6x₹861 cr6.8%9.0%0.1x
2021-116.6x₹861 cr6.8%9.0%0.1x
2021-107.0x₹861 cr6.8%9.0%0.1x
2021-097.2x₹861 cr6.8%9.0%0.1x
2021-087.6x₹861 cr6.8%9.0%0.1x
2021-077.7x₹861 cr6.8%9.0%0.1x
2021-067.1x₹861 cr6.8%9.0%0.1x
2021-057.0x₹856 cr6.4%9.0%0.0x
2021-046.3x₹856 cr6.4%9.0%0.0x
2021-035.6x₹856 cr6.4%9.0%0.0x
2021-026.1x₹856 cr6.4%9.0%0.0x
2021-015.7x₹856 cr6.4%9.0%0.0x
2020-126.5x₹856 cr6.4%9.0%0.0x
2020-114.9x₹856 cr6.4%9.0%0.0x
2020-104.3x₹856 cr6.4%9.0%0.0x
2020-094.5x₹856 cr6.4%9.0%0.0x
2020-084.5x₹856 cr6.4%9.0%0.0x
2020-073.8x₹856 cr6.4%9.0%0.0x
2020-064.2x₹856 cr6.4%9.0%0.0x
2020-052.7x₹990 cr7.1%10.0%0.0x
2020-042.9x₹990 cr7.1%10.0%0.0x
2020-032.4x₹990 cr7.1%10.0%0.0x
2020-023.9x₹990 cr7.1%10.0%0.0x
2020-013.0x₹990 cr7.1%10.0%0.0x
2019-123.0x₹990 cr7.1%10.0%0.0x
2019-113.1x₹990 cr7.1%10.0%0.0x
2019-103.1x₹990 cr7.1%10.0%0.0x
2019-093.1x₹990 cr7.1%10.0%0.0x
2019-082.8x₹990 cr7.1%10.0%0.0x
2019-072.8x₹990 cr7.1%10.0%0.0x
2019-063.2x₹990 cr7.1%10.0%0.0x
2019-052.6x₹986 cr9.7%14.0%0.1x
2019-042.5x₹986 cr9.7%14.0%0.1x
2019-032.8x₹986 cr9.7%14.0%0.1x
2019-022.3x₹986 cr9.7%14.0%0.1x
2019-012.5x₹986 cr9.7%14.0%0.1x

Methodology and data notes

Methodology

Methodology and data notes

All figures come from public exchange prices and screener.in financial statements. Quarterly and annual results are shown from 60 days after the period end, so a month never uses a result before it would plausibly have been published. Statements are the latest versions, which may include later restatements.

Sector medians, percentiles and indices use today's listed companies in the sector (survivorship bias). Prices are adjusted for splits and bonus issues; around a corporate action the fundamentals may lag the price by up to a month, and affected sections are hidden.

The return decomposition uses price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count. The reverse DCF uses a fixed 12% cost of equity, a 10-year horizon and a 15x terminal P/E, and is an illustration only. Events, flags and twins follow fixed rules and thresholds described next to each section.

Feedback