अApnaFunda
Menu

ORIENT CERATECH LIMITED (ORIENTCER)

Non-Energy Minerals · Aluminum · figures to Nov '26

Quality scoreHow the business itself ranks against its sector peers on profitability, 3-year growth and leverage. 50 is the middle of the sector.71 / 100
Profitability 62Growth 67Balance sheet 83

Passes these screensCash Rich

Compare withVEDANTANATIONAL ALUMINIUM COARFIN INDIA

Share price

Closing priceAdjusted for splits and bonus issues.

₹39.04 latest close · −3.4% over the last 90 sessions

₹40₹45Jul 3Jul 29Aug 24Sep 17Oct 14Nov 9 ₹40₹45Jul 3Sep 4Nov 9

₹39.04 month-end · −6.7% over 12 months

₹35₹40₹45₹50Nov '25Jan '26Apr '26Jun '26Sep '26Nov '26 ₹35₹40₹45₹50Nov '25May '26Nov '26

₹39.04 month-end · −30.7% over 3 years

₹40₹60Nov '23Jun '24Jan '25Sep '25Apr '26Nov '26 ₹40₹60Nov '23May '25Nov '26

₹39.04 month-end · +62.7% since Jan '19

₹20₹40₹60Jan '19Aug '20Mar '22Sep '23Apr '25Nov '26 ₹20₹40₹60Jan '19Dec '22Nov '26

52-week range ₹34.00 to ₹56.64 · 1-year volatility 46.5%

Was the rally earned?

-7%share price, 1 yearLower P/E held it back

Earnings helped, the multiple did not.

  • Per-share earnings added 82 points, but investors now pay less per rupee of profit (P/E 44.5x to 17.8x), which took 88 points back.
  • The share count barely moved.
Net profit growth: +81 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+81 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: −88 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−88 ptsP/E changeShare count change: +1 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.+1 ptsShare count changeShare price: −7%−7%Share priceNet profit growth: +81 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+81ProfitP/E change: −88 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−88P/EShare count change: +1 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.+1SharesShare price: −7%−7%Share price
Net profit growth+81 ptsNet profit rose about 132%, which lifts the price.
P/E change-88 ptsThe P/E fell from 44.5x to 17.8x, which lowers the price.
Share count change+1 ptsShare count was little changed. More shares would count against the price.
-31%share price, 3 yearsLower P/E held it back

Earnings helped, the multiple did not.

  • Per-share earnings added 51 points, but investors now pay less per rupee of profit (P/E 47.3x to 17.8x), which took 82 points back.
  • The share count barely moved.
Net profit growth: +53 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+53 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: −82 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−82 ptsP/E changeShare count change: −1 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−1 ptsShare count changeShare price: −31%−31%Share priceNet profit growth: +53 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+53ProfitP/E change: −82 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−82P/EShare count change: −1 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−1SharesShare price: −31%−31%Share price
Net profit growth+53 ptsNet profit rose about 87%, which lifts the price.
P/E change-82 ptsThe P/E fell from 47.3x to 17.8x, which lowers the price.
Share count change-1 ptsShare count was little changed. More shares would count against the price.
+57%share price, 5 yearsMultiple-driven

Partly.

  • Most of the rise came from investors paying a higher multiple (P/E 6.4x to 17.8x); per-share earnings took off 73 points.
  • The share count barely moved.
Net profit growth: −74 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).−74 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: +130 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+130 ptsP/E changeShare count change: +1 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.+1 ptsShare count changeShare price: +57%+57%Share priceNet profit growth: −74 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).−74ProfitP/E change: +130 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+130P/EShare count change: +1 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.+1SharesShare price: +57%+57%Share price
Net profit growth-74 ptsNet profit fell about 44%, which lowers the price.
P/E change+130 ptsThe P/E rose from 6.4x to 17.8x, which lifts the price.
Share count change+1 ptsShare count was little changed. More shares would count against the price.
What do "pts" mean?

"pts" are percentage points of the share price return. The parts add up to the total shown for each period. Because price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count, higher profit pushes the price up, a higher P/E pushes it up, and more shares push it down.

Example: if the price rose 34% and profit growth accounts for +58 pts while a lower P/E accounts for -24 pts, then 58 - 24 = 34. The +58 is not the profit growth rate itself: it is the part of the price move that profit growth explains.

Net profit is trailing twelve months as reported with a 60-day lag.

Compare this with VEDANTA

How rough has the ride been?

Maximum drawdown-64.0%recovered 2021-06
1-year volatility46.5%annualised

Drawdown from peak

0%−20%−40%−60%2020202120222023202420252026−63.8% 0%−20%−40%−60%2020202220242026−63.8%
Largest drawdowns

-64.0% (2019-01 peak to 2020-03 low, recovered 2021-06)

-56.7% (2024-02 peak to 2025-03 low, not yet recovered)

-39.4% (2022-02 peak to 2023-03 low, recovered 2023-07)

Is it expensive against its own past and its peers?

17.8xP/E todayWithin its usual range
Against its own history45th percentile
CheapestMedian 24.1xDearest

Usual range 4.5x to 47.6x since 2019-01.

Against Non-Energy Minerals17.8x vs 21.8x
This company
17.8x
Sector median
21.8x

18% below the Non-Energy Minerals median.

2.9x21.9x40.9x59.8xJan '19Aug '20Mar '22Oct '23May '25Nov '262.9x21.9x40.9x59.8xJan '19Sep '21May '24Nov '26
P/E (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianNon-Energy Minerals median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/B (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianNon-Energy Minerals median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/S (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianNon-Energy Minerals median
How to read this

Shaded band: 10th to 90th percentile of the company's own P/E history; dotted line: its median; orange line: sector median (companies with a positive multiple, at least 5 in the sector).

Sector figures are built from today's listed companies, so they exclude companies that are no longer listed.

All terms explained in the glossary →

How Non-Energy Minerals is valued

Where does it rank among Non-Energy Minerals peers?

Each cell is the company's percentile rank among its Non-Energy Minerals peers (non-financial companies) that month.
Darker is better-ranked.
Rows marked ↓ are inverted (lower debt, shorter cash cycle and a lower P/E rank higher).

Where it ranks today

  • ROCE47th▲ 24 pts vs a year ago
  • Op. margin77th▲ 45 pts vs a year ago
  • Revenue growth82nd▲ 52 pts vs a year ago
  • EPS growth90th▲ 67 pts vs a year ago
  • Debt/equity ↓71st▲ 14 pts vs a year ago
  • Cash cycle ↓15th▲ 7 pts vs a year ago
  • P/E ↓61st▲ 38 pts vs a year ago
  • 12M momentum54th▼ 4 pts vs a year ago

Rank history

ROCE
Op. margin
Revenue growth
EPS growth
Debt/equity ↓
Cash cycle ↓
P/E ↓
12M momentum
Dec '21Jul '22Jan '23Jul '23Jan '24Jul '24Jan '25Jul '25Jan '26Jul '26Nov '26
Lower rank Higher rank Not enough data

Percentiles use today's listed companies in the sector and need at least 5 peers with a value; grey cells have too few.
ROE is computed from net profit and book value where the source does not report it.

The Non-Energy Minerals sector page Watch it move against Non-Energy Minerals in the Observatory

What is the price implying?

~20%annual earnings growth implied by the price

At a P/E of 32.3x, the price would imply about 19.7%/yr earnings growth for 10 years under the same assumptions, but it is not ranked.

Below the ₹1,000 cr market-cap floor used for the lists.

“Implied growth” is what the current price would require under our stated assumptions, not what we expect.

What prices imply across Non-Energy Minerals The market-wide Expectations lists

Key figures

Share Priceclose 9 Nov
₹39.04
P/E
17.8x
ROCE
10.0%
Market Cap
₹467 cr
Revenue (TTM)
₹405 cr
P/S
1.2x
P/B
1.5x
ROE
8.7%
Operating Margin
16.1%
Debt / Equity
0.1x
Promoter Holding
63.9%
12M Momentum
-6.7%

52-week range

₹34.00₹56.64
22% of the way from its 52-week low to its high

Price risk

1Y volatility
46.5%
Beta vs sector
1-year daily
0.85

Balance sheet & cash

Interest cover
operating profit ÷ interest
8.1x
Cash from profit, 3Y
operating cash flow ÷ net profit
1.14x
Share count, 1Y
unchanged

Are profits backed by cash?

6 of 7checks within range1 near a threshold
Other income reliance5%Within range

Other income as a share of pre-tax profit (trailing twelve months): 5.4%. Bands: below 15%, 15% to 35%, above 35%.

Tax rate25%Within range

Median quarterly effective tax rate over about 2.5 years: 24.6%. Bands: 15% to 35%, 5% to 15% or 35% to 50%, outside 5% to 50%.

Cash conversion1.14xWithin range

Operating cash flow divided by net profit over the last three fiscal years: 1.14x (cash from operations ₹58 cr, net profit ₹51 cr). Bands: 0.8x and above, 0.5x to 0.8x, below 0.5x.

Free cash flow2 of 5 yrsNear threshold

Fiscal years with positive free cash flow in the last 5: 2. Bands: at least 80% of years, 40% to 80%, below 40%.

Receivable days vs history-19 daysWithin range

Debtor days are below the median of the previous three fiscal years by 19 days (69 vs 88). Bands: under 15 days, 15 to 45, over 45.

Capital work in progress6% of fixed assetsWithin range

Capital work-in-progress is 6% of fixed assets. Bands: not rising or up to 30%; rising for three years and above 30%; rising and above 60%.

Payable days-47 days / 2 yrsWithin range

Days payable changed by -47 over two years. Bands: rise of up to 30 days; more than 30 days.

Tap a check to see how it is measured

How to read this

Each check is a named rule with fixed thresholds, not a score. Annual statements are the latest restated figures, so a past year may differ from what was originally reported.

All terms explained in the glossary →

Who has been buying and selling?

  • Over 3 years, institutional and promoter holdings were broadly unchanged.
  • The number of shareholders rose from 23,794 to 26,226 (+10%) between Sep 2023 and Jun 2026.

Holdings, Jun '26

How each group changed

GroupSep '23Jun '26Change
Promoters63.6%63.9%+0.3 pts
FIIs13.2%13.3%+0.1 pts
DIIs———
Public and others23.2%22.8%-0.4 pts

Number of shareholders

26,226shareholders+10% since Sep '23
24k25k26k28k Sep '23Mar '24Mar '25Sep '25Mar '26Jun '26
Sep '23: 23,794
Dec '23: 25,365
Mar '24: 27,609
Jun '24: 26,922
Mar '25: 27,427
Jun '25: 27,204
Sep '25: 27,267
Dec '25: 27,084
Mar '26: 26,722
Jun '26: 26,226
 24k25k26k28k Sep '23Jun '24Sep '25Jun '26
Sep '23: 23,794
Dec '23: 25,365
Mar '24: 27,609
Jun '24: 26,922
Mar '25: 27,427
Jun '25: 27,204
Sep '25: 27,267
Dec '25: 27,084
Mar '26: 26,722
Jun '26: 26,226

Quarterly shareholding as reported, labelled by the quarter it covers (it becomes visible about two months later).
Shareholder counts are only available for recent quarters.

This quarter's smart-money board

What happened next to similar setups

+1.8%typical 12-month return vs the marketNot meaningfully different from the base rate
  • We found 50 past situations where a non-financial company looked like ORIENT CERATECH LIMITED today on valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, price momentum, size and volatility.
  • Over the following 12 months the middle half of them returned −22% to +41% vs the market, against −4% for all non-financial companies in the same months.
  • The gap against the base rate (+5.3%, 80% range −9.3% to +18.1%) is within what chance and overlapping periods produce.

Where the 50 outcomes landed

−100%−50%0%+50%+100%
CHEMBOND · May 2024: −54.1% vs market
ORIENTBELL · Mar 2023: −53.7% vs market
ALMONDZ · Jun 2025: −49.3% vs market
SMARTLINK · Jun 2024: −44.1% vs market
KOPRAN · Oct 2024: −43.9% vs market
EXXARO · May 2023: −41.7% vs market
DYNPRO · Sep 2025: −36.8% vs market
LINC · May 2025: −36.1% vs market
SCHAND · Nov 2023: −35.4% vs market
ASAHISONG · Jun 2022: −34.1% vs market
NILAINFRA · Dec 2024: −27.1% vs market
EKC · Sep 2025: −25.6% vs market
ADSL · Jul 2024: −22.7% vs market
SARLAPOLY · Aug 2022: −19.9% vs market
MIRZAINT · May 2020: −17.9% vs market
AEROENTER · Mar 2025: −17.2% vs market
CONFIPET · May 2023: −15.2% vs market
SHAH · Sep 2025: −14.0% vs market
DEVIT · Jan 2024: −13.7% vs market
TPLPLASTEH · May 2025: −13.0% vs market
CLEDUCATE · Mar 2024: −11.3% vs market
NIITLTD · Oct 2021: −9.8% vs market
MODISONLTD · Mar 2025: −3.0% vs market
VSSL · Jul 2024: +0.4% vs market
UNIDT · Jul 2025: +1.0% vs market
UNICHEMLAB · Aug 2025: +2.6% vs market
SPAL · Mar 2025: +5.1% vs market
BBL · May 2021: +9.2% vs market
MMP · Oct 2023: +16.3% vs market
NELCAST · Mar 2020: +17.6% vs market
BHAGERIA · Aug 2025: +21.0% vs market
SUNDRMBRAK · Mar 2020: +22.7% vs market
SHREEPUSHK · Jun 2021: +29.9% vs market
SHALBY · May 2023: +31.5% vs market
IFGLEXPOR · Feb 2020: +32.6% vs market
KILITCH · Jul 2023: +36.2% vs market
GENUSPAPER · Oct 2020: +36.2% vs market
SUNFLAG · May 2022: +42.2% vs market
WEIZMANIND · Feb 2022: +48.0% vs market
PDMJEPAPER · May 2020: +48.6% vs market
STERTOOLS · Sep 2022: +54.7% vs market
NDRAUTO · Nov 2021: +66.5% vs market
ARTEMISMED · Mar 2021: +68.5% vs market
PRECAM · Oct 2020: +85.7% vs market
ADOR · Jul 2020: +87.4% vs market
GENUSPOWER · Mar 2020: +92.4% vs market
MARINE · Oct 2022: +109.0% vs market
TDPOWERSYS · May 2021: +115.8% vs market
BLISSGVS · Apr 2025: +118.4% vs market
BORORENEW · Jan 2020: +289.7% vs market
Similar setups +1.8%All companies −3.5%← worse than the marketbetter than the market →

Each dot is one past situation (hover or tap for details) · Solid dots are the closest matches, listed below · Shaded is the middle half of all companies in the same months · 4 beyond the range shown, drawn at the edge

Similar setups' median
+1.8%
All companies' median
−3.5%
Beat the market
54% vs 46%

50 past situations · 50 companies · 36 months · 2020–2025

The closest matches

CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
BHAGERIA
Process Industries		 Aug 2025 21x8% −19%−29% +21%
CLEDUCATE
Commercial Services		 Mar 2024 21x7% +73%−24% −11%
MMP
Non-Energy Minerals		 Oct 2023 25x10% +36%−16% +16%
BORORENEW
Process Industries		 Jan 2020 10x10% −18%−26% +290%
TDPOWERSYS
Producer Manufacturing		 May 2021 20x6% +128%−15% +116%
Show the other 3 matches
CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
PRECAM
Producer Manufacturing		 Oct 2020 9x6% +1%−26% +86%
UNIDT
Industrial Services		 Jul 2025 28x8% −14%−26% +1%
KOPRAN
Health Technology		 Oct 2024 23x14% +27%−18% −44%
How reliable is this?

Matched on P/E, P/S, ROCE, operating margin, debt/equity, interest cover, revenue growth, 12-month momentum, drawdown from 12-month high, size and volatility. Closest on: drawdown from 12-month high, P/S and 12-month momentum. One match per company and at most 7 from any one month.

Independent periods: the matches fall in 6 distinct 12-month windows. Matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, so fewer windows means less evidence.

How this is built

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to ORIENT CERATECH LIMITED. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

Methodology

How historical analogs are built

Data as of 2026-11-09. Outcome pool: Jan 2020 to Oct 2025.

For every company we look at the situation it is in today (valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, 12-month price momentum, drawdown, size and volatility) and find past company-months that looked most like it. We then show what happened to those past situations over the following 12 months, measured against the ApnaFunda All index and against the base rate. It describes history. It does not predict anything.

What is compared

FeatureWeightNon-financialFinancial
P/E1yesyes
P/S1yes—
P/B1—yes
ROCE1yes—
operating margin1yes—
ROE1—yes
debt/equity0.75yes—
interest cover0.5yes—
revenue growth0.75yesyes
12-month momentum1yesyes
drawdown from 12-month high0.75yesyes
size0.75yesyes
volatility0.5yesyes

Weights were set by judgement before any outcome was looked at and are never tuned on results. Loss-making companies (negative P/E or net profit) are only matched with other loss-making companies. Banks, NBFCs and insurers are compared only with each other and use a different feature set. Every feature is converted, month by month, to its rank among companies in the same pool in that month, so a P/E of 30 in a hot market and a P/E of 22 in a cold one can match if both were equally expensive for their time. Only that month's data is used.

How closeness and the sample are defined

Distance is the weighted root-mean-square gap between the standardised features both companies have. A match needs at least 70% of the query's feature weight, a distance of at most 0.9, and 30 matches at minimum to be shown. We keep up to 50 matches with these exclusions: never the company itself, one match per company (its closest month), and at most 7 from any one calendar month so a single market episode cannot dominate.

Base rate

The base rate is the distribution of 12-month returns, relative to the market, of every eligible company-month in the same pool, with each month weighted to match the months the analogs came from. It answers: how did a random company do in these same months? Because matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, we also report the number of distinct 12-month windows behind a result, and a bootstrap that resamples months decides whether the analog median differs from the base rate at all. "Not meaningfully different" is the usual outcome and the page copy is written for it.

Limits you should know

  • One market period. The outcome pool covers 2020–2025 only (70 months), including the 2020 crash and the 2020–21 rally.
  • Survivorship. Only companies listed today are included. Delisted and bankrupt companies are missing, which flatters past outcomes, particularly for distressed-looking setups.
  • Price return only. Dividends are excluded, and the benchmark is an ApnaFunda market-cap-weighted index of the same listed companies, not an official index.
  • Reporting lag. Fundamentals are matched on an assumed 60-day lag after the quarter end, not on real announcement dates.
  • Pools: non-financial: 98,395 company-months from 2019 companies; financial: 5,659 company-months from 108 companies. 2349 companies currently have a result; the rest are suppressed because too few comparable situations exist.

Does it work? A walk-forward check

The walk-forward check has not been run for this build, so skill is shown as not yet measured.

Disclaimer

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to any company shown. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

What changed?

29 events since Mar '20

  1. SepPeer rankMoved into the top quartile of Non-Energy Minerals on operating margin (from the 2nd quartile).
  2. JunPeer rankMoved into the 3rd quartile of Non-Energy Minerals on ROCE (from the bottom quartile).
  3. MarPeer rankMoved into the top quartile of Non-Energy Minerals on EPS growth (from the 2nd quartile).
  4. DecResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned positive.
  5. DecPeer rankMoved into the 2nd quartile of Non-Energy Minerals on operating margin (from the 3rd quartile).
  6. SepPeer rankSlipped to the 3rd quartile of Non-Energy Minerals on operating margin (from the 2nd quartile).
  7. JulValuationP/E crossed above the 90th percentile of its own history to date (52.0x).
  8. JunPeer rankSlipped to the bottom quartile of Non-Energy Minerals on ROCE (from the 3rd quartile).
Show 21 earlier events
  1. MarResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned negative.
  2. MarPriceFell 57% from the Feb 2024 peak to the Mar 2025 low.
  3. MarPeer rankSlipped to the 3rd quartile of Non-Energy Minerals on operating margin (from the 2nd quartile).
  4. DecPeer rankMoved into the 2nd quartile of Non-Energy Minerals on operating margin (from the 3rd quartile).
  5. JunPeer rankSlipped to the 2nd quartile of Non-Energy Minerals on EPS growth (from the top quartile).
  6. FebValuationP/E crossed above the 90th percentile of its own history to date (53.9x).
  7. JulPriceRegained the 2022-02 peak, 4 months after the low.
  8. JunResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned positive.
  9. JunPeer rankMoved into the top quartile of Non-Energy Minerals on EPS growth (from the bottom quartile).
  10. MayValuationP/E crossed above the 90th percentile of its own history to date (49.6x).
  11. MarPriceFell 39% from the Feb 2022 peak to the Mar 2023 low.
  12. JanDebtDebt / equity halved over 12 months to 0.15x.
  13. JunPeer rankSlipped to the bottom quartile of Non-Energy Minerals on EPS growth (from the 3rd quartile).
  14. JunDebtDebt / equity halved over 12 months to 0.15x.
  15. FebPriceRegained the 2021-07 peak, 2 months after the low.
  16. DecPriceFell 32% from the Jul 2021 peak to the Dec 2021 low.
  17. DecValuationP/E crossed above the 90th percentile of its own history to date (7.7x).
  18. JunPriceRegained the 2019-01 peak, 15 months after the low.
  19. JunPeer rankSlipped to the 3rd quartile of Non-Energy Minerals on EPS growth (from the 2nd quartile).
  20. JanValuationP/E crossed above the 90th percentile of its own history to date (6.3x).
  21. MarPriceFell 64% from the Jan 2019 peak to the Mar 2020 low.

Events are generated from the data by fixed rules.
The month shown is when the change became visible in the reported figures, assuming a 60-day lag after each quarter end; it is not an announcement date.

Where price and fundamentals disagree, market-wide Rewind the whole market to any month

Monthly history95 months · 2019-01 to 2026-11
MonthP/ERevenue (TTM)ROEROCEDebt / Equity
2026-1117.8x₹405 cr8.7%10.0%0.1x
2026-1017.8x₹405 cr8.7%10.0%0.1x
2026-0920.5x₹405 cr8.7%10.0%0.1x
2026-0824.5x₹400 cr7.2%10.0%0.1x
2026-0722.4x₹400 cr7.2%10.0%0.1x
2026-0621.7x₹400 cr7.2%10.0%0.1x
2026-0525.2x₹388 cr7.0%6.0%0.3x
2026-0424.9x₹388 cr7.0%6.0%0.3x
2026-0320.9x₹388 cr7.0%6.0%0.3x
2026-0227.2x₹368 cr6.0%6.0%0.3x
2026-0129.6x₹368 cr6.0%6.0%0.3x
2025-1234.8x₹368 cr6.0%6.0%0.3x
2025-1144.5x₹325 cr4.0%6.0%0.3x
2025-1039.1x₹325 cr4.0%6.0%0.3x
2025-0939.3x₹325 cr4.0%6.0%0.3x
2025-0844.3x₹327 cr3.5%6.0%0.3x
2025-0752.0x₹327 cr3.5%6.0%0.3x
2025-0643.6x₹327 cr3.5%6.0%0.3x
2025-0540.5x₹325 cr3.9%8.0%0.2x
2025-0440.0x₹325 cr3.9%8.0%0.2x
2025-0334.2x₹325 cr3.9%8.0%0.2x
2025-0228.3x₹326 cr5.2%8.0%0.2x
2025-0138.4x₹326 cr5.2%8.0%0.2x
2024-1243.6x₹326 cr5.2%8.0%0.2x
2024-1129.6x₹339 cr6.4%8.0%0.2x
2024-1031.1x₹339 cr6.4%8.0%0.2x
2024-0935.2x₹339 cr6.4%8.0%0.2x
2024-0834.6x₹313 cr6.9%8.0%0.2x
2024-0732.3x₹313 cr6.9%8.0%0.2x
2024-0631.1x₹313 cr6.9%8.0%0.2x
2024-0536.9x₹302 cr5.4%8.0%0.1x
2024-0441.6x₹302 cr5.4%8.0%0.1x
2024-0339.9x₹302 cr5.4%8.0%0.1x
2024-0253.9x₹302 cr5.4%8.0%0.1x
2024-0147.6x₹302 cr5.4%8.0%0.1x
2023-1242.9x₹302 cr5.4%8.0%0.1x
2023-1147.3x₹302 cr5.4%8.0%0.1x
2023-1035.8x₹302 cr5.4%8.0%0.1x
2023-0931.9x₹302 cr5.4%8.0%0.1x
2023-0827.5x₹302 cr5.4%8.0%0.1x
2023-0728.2x₹302 cr5.4%8.0%0.1x
2023-0624.1x₹302 cr5.4%8.0%0.1x
2023-0549.6x₹268 cr2.8%—0.2x
2023-0445.2x₹268 cr2.8%—0.2x
2023-0340.2x₹268 cr2.8%—0.2x
2023-0245.8x₹268 cr2.8%—0.2x
2023-0147.9x₹268 cr2.8%—0.2x
2022-1250.5x₹268 cr2.8%—0.2x
2022-1151.1x₹268 cr2.8%—0.2x
2022-1051.1x₹268 cr2.8%—0.2x
2022-0952.5x₹268 cr2.8%—0.2x
2022-0859.8x₹268 cr2.8%—0.2x
2022-0746.4x₹268 cr2.8%—0.2x
2022-0647.6x₹268 cr2.8%—0.2x
2022-057.6x₹366 cr25.5%—0.5x
2022-048.2x₹366 cr25.5%—0.5x
2022-037.6x₹366 cr25.5%—0.5x
2022-027.1x₹366 cr25.5%—0.5x
2022-017.5x₹366 cr25.5%—0.5x
2021-127.7x₹366 cr25.5%—0.5x
2021-116.4x₹366 cr25.5%—0.5x
2021-107.3x₹366 cr25.5%—0.5x
2021-097.3x₹366 cr25.5%—0.5x
2021-087.1x₹366 cr25.5%—0.5x
2021-078.8x₹366 cr25.5%—0.5x
2021-068.1x₹366 cr25.5%—0.5x
2021-056.3x₹366 cr25.5%—0.5x
2021-046.3x₹366 cr25.5%—0.5x
2021-035.3x₹366 cr25.5%—0.5x
2021-025.8x₹366 cr25.5%—0.5x
2021-016.3x₹366 cr25.5%—0.5x
2020-125.8x₹366 cr25.5%—0.5x
2020-115.1x₹366 cr25.5%—0.5x
2020-105.0x₹366 cr25.5%—0.5x
2020-095.1x₹366 cr25.5%—0.5x
2020-084.9x₹366 cr25.5%—0.5x
2020-074.4x₹366 cr25.5%—0.5x
2020-064.3x₹366 cr25.5%—0.5x
2020-053.2x₹366 cr25.5%—0.5x
2020-043.4x₹366 cr25.5%—0.5x
2020-032.9x₹366 cr25.5%—0.5x
2020-023.9x₹366 cr25.5%—0.5x
2020-014.7x₹366 cr25.5%—0.5x
2019-124.0x₹366 cr25.5%—0.5x
2019-114.5x₹366 cr25.5%—0.5x
2019-104.5x₹366 cr25.5%—0.5x
2019-094.5x₹366 cr25.5%—0.5x
2019-084.4x₹366 cr25.5%—0.5x
2019-074.6x₹366 cr25.5%—0.5x
2019-064.6x₹366 cr25.5%—0.5x
2019-056.1x₹366 cr25.5%—0.5x
2019-046.0x₹366 cr25.5%—0.5x
2019-036.9x₹366 cr25.5%—0.5x
2019-025.9x₹366 cr25.5%—0.5x
2019-016.1x₹366 cr25.5%—0.5x

Methodology and data notes

Methodology

Methodology and data notes

All figures come from public exchange prices and screener.in financial statements. Quarterly and annual results are shown from 60 days after the period end, so a month never uses a result before it would plausibly have been published. Statements are the latest versions, which may include later restatements.

Sector medians, percentiles and indices use today's listed companies in the sector (survivorship bias). Prices are adjusted for splits and bonus issues; around a corporate action the fundamentals may lag the price by up to a month, and affected sections are hidden.

The return decomposition uses price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count. The reverse DCF uses a fixed 12% cost of equity, a 10-year horizon and a 15x terminal P/E, and is an illustration only. Events, flags and twins follow fixed rules and thresholds described next to each section.

Feedback