अApnaFunda

PRECISION CAMSHAFTS LIMITED (PRECAM)

Producer Manufacturing · Auto Parts: OEM · figures to Nov '26

Quality scoreHow the business itself ranks against its sector peers on profitability, 3-year growth and leverage. 50 is the middle of the sector.42 / 100
Profitability 14Growth 12Balance sheet 100
Momentum scoreHow strong the recent trend is: 3-month price change, 12-month improvement in earnings and the rise in FII + DII holding, among companies above ₹500 cr.32 / 100
Price 5Earnings 33FII/DII 58

Passes these screensCash Rich

Share price

Closing priceAdjusted for splits and bonus issues.

₹103.86 latest close · −31.9% over the last 90 sessions

₹100₹120₹140Jul 3Jul 29Aug 24Sep 17Oct 14Nov 9 ₹100₹120₹140Jul 3Sep 4Nov 9

₹103.86 month-end · −40.5% over 12 months

₹100₹125₹150₹175Nov '25Jan '26Apr '26Jun '26Sep '26Nov '26 ₹100₹125₹150₹175Nov '25May '26Nov '26

₹103.86 month-end · −55.8% over 3 years

₹100₹200₹300Nov '23Jun '24Jan '25Sep '25Apr '26Nov '26 ₹100₹200₹300Nov '23May '25Nov '26

₹103.86 month-end · +80.6% since Jan '19

₹0₹100₹200₹300Jan '19Aug '20Mar '22Sep '23Apr '25Nov '26 ₹0₹100₹200₹300Jan '19Dec '22Nov '26

52-week range ₹88.92 to ₹193.95 · 1-year volatility 45.9%

Was the rally earned?

-41%share price, 1 yearEarnings-driven

Mostly earnings.

  • Per-share earnings took off 31 points, while the multiple moved less (P/E 27.1x to 24.1x).
  • The share count barely moved.
Net profit growth: −31 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).−31 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: −9 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−9 ptsP/E changeShare count change: 0 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.0 ptsShare count changeShare price: −40%−40%Share priceNet profit growth: −31 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).−31ProfitP/E change: −9 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−9P/EShare count change: 0 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.0SharesShare price: −40%−40%Share price
Net profit growth-31 ptsNet profit fell about 33%, which lowers the price.
P/E change-9 ptsThe P/E fell from 27.1x to 24.1x, which lowers the price.
Share count change0 ptsShare count was little changed. More shares would count against the price.
-56%share price, 3 yearsMultiple-driven

Mostly the multiple.

  • Most of the fall came from investors paying a lower multiple (P/E 48.3x to 24.1x); per-share earnings took off 8 points.
  • The share count barely moved.
Net profit growth: −8 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).−8 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: −47 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−47 ptsP/E changeShare count change: 0 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.0 ptsShare count changeShare price: −56%−56%Share priceNet profit growth: −8 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).−8ProfitP/E change: −47 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−47P/EShare count change: 0 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.0SharesShare price: −56%−56%Share price
Net profit growth-8 ptsNet profit fell about 11%, which lowers the price.
P/E change-47 ptsThe P/E fell from 48.3x to 24.1x, which lowers the price.
Share count change0 ptsShare count was little changed. More shares would count against the price.
-21%share price, 5 yearsLower P/E held it back

Earnings helped, the multiple did not.

  • Per-share earnings added 257 points, but investors now pay less per rupee of profit (P/E 550.0x to 24.1x), which took 278 points back.
  • The share count barely moved.
Net profit growth: +257 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+257 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: −278 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−278 ptsP/E changeShare price: −21%−21%Share priceNet profit growth: +257 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+257ProfitP/E change: −278 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−278P/EShare price: −21%−21%Share price
Net profit growth+257 ptsNet profit rose about 1695%, which lifts the price.
P/E change-278 ptsThe P/E fell from 550.0x to 24.1x, which lowers the price.
Share count change0 ptsShare count was little changed. More shares would count against the price.
What do "pts" mean?

"pts" are percentage points of the share price return. The parts add up to the total shown for each period. Because price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count, higher profit pushes the price up, a higher P/E pushes it up, and more shares push it down.

Example: if the price rose 34% and profit growth accounts for +58 pts while a lower P/E accounts for -24 pts, then 58 - 24 = 34. The +58 is not the profit growth rate itself: it is the part of the price move that profit growth explains.

Net profit is trailing twelve months as reported with a 60-day lag.

Compare this with SAMVARDHANA MOTHERSON INT

How rough has the ride been?

Maximum drawdown-75.0%not yet recovered
1-year volatility45.9%annualised
Beta vs sector index1.383-year daily, correlation 0.53
Volume spikes3last 90 sessions, 5x the 50-day median

Drawdown from peak

0%−25%−50%−75%2020202120222023202420252026−75.0% 0%−25%−50%−75%2020202220242026−75.0%
Largest drawdowns

-75.0% (2025-01 peak to 2026-10 low, not yet recovered)

-68.7% (2019-01 peak to 2020-03 low, recovered 2021-06)

-52.8% (2022-01 peak to 2022-06 low, recovered 2023-06)

Most recent volume spikes

2026-10-22: 5.1x the 50-day median, price -5.1% that day

2026-10-21: 6.7x the 50-day median, price -9.0% that day

2026-09-23: 13.6x the 50-day median, price +2.7% that day

Beta is the slope of daily returns against a market-cap-weighted index of the sector's other listed companies, built from today's constituents (so it excludes companies no longer listed).

Is it expensive against its own past and its peers?

24.1xP/E todayWithin its usual range
Against its own history38th percentile
CheapestMedian 29.4xDearest

Usual range 11.6x to 382.7x since 2019-01.

Against Producer Manufacturing24.1x vs 29.6x
This company
24.1x
Sector median
29.6x

18% below the Producer Manufacturing median.

7.3x234.2x461.0x687.9xJan '19Aug '20Mar '22Oct '23May '25Nov '267.3x234.2x461.0x687.9xJan '19Sep '21May '24Nov '26
P/E (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianProducer Manufacturing median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/B (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianProducer Manufacturing median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/S (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianProducer Manufacturing median
How to read this

Shaded band: 10th to 90th percentile of the company's own P/E history; dotted line: its median; orange line: sector median (companies with a positive multiple, at least 5 in the sector).

Sector figures are built from today's listed companies, so they exclude companies that are no longer listed.

All terms explained in the glossary →

How Producer Manufacturing is valued

Where does it rank among Producer Manufacturing peers?

Each cell is the company's percentile rank among its Producer Manufacturing peers (non-financial companies) that month.
Darker is better-ranked.
Rows marked ↓ are inverted (lower debt, shorter cash cycle and a lower P/E rank higher).

Where it ranks today

  • ROCE17thflat vs a year ago
  • Op. margin12th▼ 12 pts vs a year ago
  • Revenue growth11th▲ 6 pts vs a year ago
  • EPS growth16th▼ 60 pts vs a year ago
  • Debt/equity ↓76th▲ 18 pts vs a year ago
  • Cash cycle ↓69th▲ 11 pts vs a year ago
  • P/E ↓61stflat vs a year ago
  • 12M momentum11th▲ 4 pts vs a year ago

Rank history

ROCE
Op. margin
Revenue growth
EPS growth
Debt/equity ↓
Cash cycle ↓
P/E ↓
12M momentum
Dec '21Jul '22Jan '23Jul '23Jan '24Jul '24Jan '25Jul '25Jan '26Jul '26Nov '26
Lower rank Higher rank Not enough data

Percentiles use today's listed companies in the sector and need at least 5 peers with a value; grey cells have too few.
ROE is computed from net profit and book value where the source does not report it.

The Producer Manufacturing sector page Watch it move against Producer Manufacturing in the Observatory

What is the price implying?

~14%annual earnings growth implied by the price

At a P/E of 20.8x, the price would imply about 14.3%/yr earnings growth for 10 years under the same assumptions, but it is not ranked.

Below the ₹1,000 cr market-cap floor used for the lists.

“Implied growth” is what the current price would require under our stated assumptions, not what we expect.

What prices imply across Producer Manufacturing The market-wide Expectations lists

Key figures

Share Priceclose 9 Nov
₹103.86
P/E
24.1x
ROCE
7.0%
Market Cap
₹986 cr
Revenue (TTM)
₹766 cr
P/S
1.3x
P/B
1.2x
ROE
4.9%
Operating Margin
3.8%
Debt / Equity
0.1x
Promoter Holding
65.4%
12M Momentum
-40.5%

52-week range

₹88.92₹193.95
14% of the way from its 52-week low to its high

Price risk

1Y volatility
45.9%
Beta vs sector
1-year daily
1.48

Balance sheet & cash

Interest cover
operating profit ÷ interest
11.4x
Cash from profit, 3Y
operating cash flow ÷ net profit
2.72x
Share count, 1Y
unchanged

Are profits backed by cash?

6 of 7checks within range1 beyond a threshold
Other income reliance81%Beyond threshold

Other income as a share of pre-tax profit (trailing twelve months): 81.1%. Bands: below 15%, 15% to 35%, above 35%.

Tax rate31%Within range

Median quarterly effective tax rate over about 2.5 years: 30.7%. Bands: 15% to 35%, 5% to 15% or 35% to 50%, outside 5% to 50%.

Cash conversion2.72xWithin range

Operating cash flow divided by net profit over the last three fiscal years: 2.72x (cash from operations ₹394 cr, net profit ₹145 cr). Bands: 0.8x and above, 0.5x to 0.8x, below 0.5x.

Free cash flow5 of 5 yrsWithin range

Fiscal years with positive free cash flow in the last 5: 5. Bands: at least 80% of years, 40% to 80%, below 40%.

Receivable days vs history-10 daysWithin range

Debtor days are below the median of the previous three fiscal years by 10 days (59 vs 69). Bands: under 15 days, 15 to 45, over 45.

Capital work in progress21% of fixed assetsWithin range

Capital work-in-progress is 21% of fixed assets. Bands: not rising or up to 30%; rising for three years and above 30%; rising and above 60%.

Payable days+2 days / 2 yrsWithin range

Days payable changed by +2 over two years. Bands: rise of up to 30 days; more than 30 days.

Tap a check to see how it is measured

How to read this

Each check is a named rule with fixed thresholds, not a score. Annual statements are the latest restated figures, so a past year may differ from what was originally reported.

All terms explained in the glossary →

Who has been buying and selling?

  • Over 3 years, institutional and promoter holdings were broadly unchanged.
  • The number of shareholders rose from 48,520 to 61,240 (+26%) between Sep 2023 and Jun 2026.

Holdings, Jun '26

How each group changed

GroupSep '23Jun '26Change
Promoters65.4%65.4%0.0 pts
FIIs0.1%0.3%+0.2 pts
DIIs0.1%0.0%-0.1 pts
Public and others34.4%34.4%0.0 pts

Number of shareholders

61,240shareholders+26% since Sep '23
48k53k58k64k Sep '23Mar '24Dec '24Jun '25Dec '25Jun '26
Sep '23: 48,520
Dec '23: 47,767
Mar '24: 50,444
Sep '24: 51,315
Dec '24: 54,184
Mar '25: 54,612
Jun '25: 56,997
Sep '25: 63,733
Dec '25: 62,248
Mar '26: 60,950
Jun '26: 61,240
48k53k58k64k Sep '23Dec '24Dec '25Jun '26
Sep '23: 48,520
Dec '23: 47,767
Mar '24: 50,444
Sep '24: 51,315
Dec '24: 54,184
Mar '25: 54,612
Jun '25: 56,997
Sep '25: 63,733
Dec '25: 62,248
Mar '26: 60,950
Jun '26: 61,240

Quarterly shareholding as reported, labelled by the quarter it covers (it becomes visible about two months later).
Shareholder counts are only available for recent quarters.

This quarter's smart-money board

What happened next to similar setups

−9.7%typical 12-month return vs the marketNot meaningfully different from the base rate
  • We found 50 past situations where a non-financial company looked like PRECISION CAMSHAFTS LIMITED today on valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, price momentum, size and volatility.
  • Over the following 12 months the middle half of them returned −21% to +23% vs the market, against −4% for all non-financial companies in the same months.
  • The gap against the base rate (−6.0%, 80% range −13.3% to +2.9%) is within what chance and overlapping periods produce.

Where the 50 outcomes landed

−100%−50%0%+50%+100%
GSS · Jun 2023: −65.6% vs market
VIKASLIFE · Aug 2024: −50.7% vs market
ORIENTBELL · Jun 2023: −48.5% vs market
RKSWAMY · Oct 2025: −39.4% vs market
VIKASECO · Sep 2024: −38.8% vs market
DCXINDIA · Oct 2025: −37.8% vs market
SHYAMCENT · May 2023: −31.3% vs market
VAIBHAVGBL · May 2024: −28.5% vs market
WATERBASE · Mar 2022: −27.2% vs market
KITEX · Jun 2023: −24.1% vs market
BHAGERIA · Jul 2023: −22.6% vs market
PPAP · Mar 2021: −21.9% vs market
VASCONEQ · Jan 2025: −21.2% vs market
FAIRCHEMOR · Aug 2025: −20.1% vs market
BBL · Jul 2025: −19.6% vs market
EXCELINDUS · Jun 2023: −18.8% vs market
TVTODAY · Aug 2023: −18.1% vs market
FORCEMOT · May 2021: −17.6% vs market
MOLDTECH · Jun 2025: −16.9% vs market
ALBERTDAVD · Jun 2025: −16.5% vs market
BYKE · Feb 2020: −16.3% vs market
RUPA · Aug 2023: −15.7% vs market
SHRIPISTON · May 2021: −14.8% vs market
UNIDT · May 2024: −14.6% vs market
VARDHACRLC · Sep 2022: −10.8% vs market
ONMOBILE · Jan 2023: −8.6% vs market
KABRAEXTRU · Jun 2025: −7.3% vs market
PREMEXPLN · Feb 2020: −7.0% vs market
SHIVALIK · May 2024: −6.5% vs market
DOLLAR · Jun 2023: −2.9% vs market
MANALIPETC · Nov 2024: +0.4% vs market
CLEDUCATE · Apr 2023: +7.5% vs market
IPL · Jul 2024: +8.0% vs market
SANDHAR · Apr 2021: +8.6% vs market
CONFIPET · Apr 2022: +10.8% vs market
EVERESTIND · Jun 2020: +12.7% vs market
SHALBY · Apr 2022: +16.8% vs market
APCOTEXIND · Feb 2020: +24.4% vs market
NIITLTD · Jun 2024: +24.6% vs market
JTLIND · Sep 2025: +28.8% vs market
MOREPENLAB · Jul 2023: +30.3% vs market
KIRIINDUS · Dec 2023: +32.1% vs market
NAVNETEDUL · Dec 2021: +35.8% vs market
TTKHLTCARE · Sep 2021: +39.1% vs market
BOROLTD · Jul 2021: +49.5% vs market
SEMAC · Sep 2021: +52.3% vs market
THEINVEST · Aug 2023: +66.7% vs market
NUCLEUS · Jun 2022: +132.6% vs market
NEULANDLAB · Aug 2022: +179.0% vs market
IGPL · Jun 2020: +181.8% vs market
Similar setups −9.7%All companies −3.7%← worse than the marketbetter than the market →

Each dot is one past situation (hover or tap for details) · Solid dots are the closest matches, listed below · Shaded is the middle half of all companies in the same months · 3 beyond the range shown, drawn at the edge

Similar setups' median
−9.7%
All companies' median
−3.7%
Beat the market
40% vs 46%

50 past situations · 50 companies · 32 months · 2020–2025

The closest matches

CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
MOREPENLAB
Health Technology
Jul 2023 41x8% −14%−27% +30%
ALBERTDAVD
Health Technology
Jun 2025 28x6% −39%−51% −17%
VIKASECO
Process Industries
Sep 2024 35x5% −6%−34% −39%
PPAP
Producer Manufacturing
Mar 2021 15x8% +39%−31% −22%
RKSWAMY
Commercial Services
Oct 2025 35x10% −42%−53% −39%
Show the other 3 matches
CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
PREMEXPLN
Process Industries
Feb 2020 11x9% −51%−57% −7%
ONMOBILE
Communications
Jan 2023 29x6% −40%−52% −9%
JTLIND
Non-Energy Minerals
Sep 2025 31x13% −42%−43% +29%
How reliable is this?

Matched on P/E, P/S, ROCE, operating margin, debt/equity, interest cover, revenue growth, 12-month momentum, drawdown from 12-month high, size and volatility. Closest on: 12-month momentum, ROCE and drawdown from 12-month high. One match per company and at most 7 from any one month.

Independent periods: the matches fall in 6 distinct 12-month windows. Matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, so fewer windows means less evidence.

How this is built

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to PRECISION CAMSHAFTS LIMITED. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

Methodology

How historical analogs are built

Data as of 2026-11-09. Outcome pool: Jan 2020 to Oct 2025.

For every company we look at the situation it is in today (valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, 12-month price momentum, drawdown, size and volatility) and find past company-months that looked most like it. We then show what happened to those past situations over the following 12 months, measured against the ApnaFunda All index and against the base rate. It describes history. It does not predict anything.

What is compared

FeatureWeightNon-financialFinancial
P/E1yesyes
P/S1yes—
P/B1—yes
ROCE1yes—
operating margin1yes—
ROE1—yes
debt/equity0.75yes—
interest cover0.5yes—
revenue growth0.75yesyes
12-month momentum1yesyes
drawdown from 12-month high0.75yesyes
size0.75yesyes
volatility0.5yesyes

Weights were set by judgement before any outcome was looked at and are never tuned on results. Loss-making companies (negative P/E or net profit) are only matched with other loss-making companies. Banks, NBFCs and insurers are compared only with each other and use a different feature set. Every feature is converted, month by month, to its rank among companies in the same pool in that month, so a P/E of 30 in a hot market and a P/E of 22 in a cold one can match if both were equally expensive for their time. Only that month's data is used.

How closeness and the sample are defined

Distance is the weighted root-mean-square gap between the standardised features both companies have. A match needs at least 70% of the query's feature weight, a distance of at most 0.9, and 30 matches at minimum to be shown. We keep up to 50 matches with these exclusions: never the company itself, one match per company (its closest month), and at most 7 from any one calendar month so a single market episode cannot dominate.

Base rate

The base rate is the distribution of 12-month returns, relative to the market, of every eligible company-month in the same pool, with each month weighted to match the months the analogs came from. It answers: how did a random company do in these same months? Because matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, we also report the number of distinct 12-month windows behind a result, and a bootstrap that resamples months decides whether the analog median differs from the base rate at all. "Not meaningfully different" is the usual outcome and the page copy is written for it.

Limits you should know

  • One market period. The outcome pool covers 2020–2025 only (70 months), including the 2020 crash and the 2020–21 rally.
  • Survivorship. Only companies listed today are included. Delisted and bankrupt companies are missing, which flatters past outcomes, particularly for distressed-looking setups.
  • Price return only. Dividends are excluded, and the benchmark is an ApnaFunda market-cap-weighted index of the same listed companies, not an official index.
  • Reporting lag. Fundamentals are matched on an assumed 60-day lag after the quarter end, not on real announcement dates.
  • Pools: non-financial: 98,395 company-months from 2019 companies; financial: 5,659 company-months from 108 companies. 2349 companies currently have a result; the rest are suppressed because too few comparable situations exist.

Does it work? A walk-forward check

The walk-forward check has not been run for this build, so skill is shown as not yet measured.

Disclaimer

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to any company shown. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

What else looks like this?

Companies with the most similar financial profile today, regardless of industry.

Health Technology
70%similar
P/Emarket cap
Retail Trade
68%similar
EPS growthmarket cap
Finance
67%similar
debt/equitymarket cap
Transportation
63%similar
debt/equityP/E
VISA CHROMEVISACHROME
Non-Energy Minerals
60%similar
operating marginrevenue growth
ORIENT BELLORIENTBELL
Producer Manufacturing
75%similar
revenuepromoter holding
Producer Manufacturing
66%similar
P/Eoperating margin
Producer Manufacturing
66%similar
market capP/E

Similarity is statistical, based on reported metrics; it does not imply similar business quality or future returns.

What changed?

30 events since Jun '23

  1. OctPriceFell 75% from the Jan 2025 peak to the Oct 2026 low.
  2. OctPriceVolume reached 6.7x its 50-day median on 2026-10-21; price -9.0% that day.
  3. SepPeer rankSlipped to the bottom quartile of Producer Manufacturing on operating margin (from the 2nd quartile).
  4. SepPriceVolume reached 13.6x its 50-day median on 2026-09-23; price +2.7% that day.
  5. JunResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned negative.
  6. JunPeer rankMoved into the 2nd quartile of Producer Manufacturing on operating margin (from the 3rd quartile).
  7. AprPriceVolume reached 19.5x its 50-day median on 2026-04-09; price +8.2% that day.
  8. MarPeer rankMoved into the 3rd quartile of Producer Manufacturing on operating margin (from the bottom quartile).
Show 22 earlier events
  1. MarPriceVolume reached 108.0x its 50-day median on 2026-03-24; price +8.0% that day.
  2. DecPriceVolume reached 23.4x its 50-day median on 2025-12-19; price +12.3% that day.
  3. SepPeer rankSlipped to the bottom quartile of Producer Manufacturing on operating margin (from the 2nd quartile).
  4. SepPriceVolume reached 293.4x its 50-day median on 2025-09-09; price +16.1% that day.
  5. JunResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned positive.
  6. JunPeer rankMoved into the 2nd quartile of Producer Manufacturing on operating margin (from the bottom quartile).
  7. MayPriceVolume reached 30.4x its 50-day median on 2025-05-28; price +11.3% that day.
  8. MarResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned negative.
  9. MarPeer rankSlipped to the bottom quartile of Producer Manufacturing on operating margin (from the 3rd quartile).
  10. OctPriceRegained the 2023-09 peak, 3 months after the low.
  11. OctPriceVolume reached 38.8x its 50-day median on 2024-10-17; price +1.9% that day.
  12. SepResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned positive.
  13. SepPeer rankMoved into the 3rd quartile of Producer Manufacturing on EPS growth (from the bottom quartile).
  14. AugPriceVolume reached 37.4x its 50-day median on 2024-08-22; price +17.9% that day.
  15. JulPriceFell 42% from the Sep 2023 peak to the Jul 2024 low.
  16. JunResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned negative.
  17. JunPeer rankSlipped to the bottom quartile of Producer Manufacturing on EPS growth (from the 3rd quartile).
  18. MayPriceVolume reached 13.5x its 50-day median on 2024-05-23; price +8.3% that day.
  19. MarPriceVolume reached 11.0x its 50-day median on 2024-03-18; price +9.6% that day.
  20. DecPriceVolume reached 5.5x its 50-day median on 2023-12-13; price +5.0% that day.
  21. JulPriceVolume reached 10.4x its 50-day median on 2023-07-17; price +19.1% that day.
  22. JunResultsRevenue (TTM) reached a new high of ₹1,080 cr.

Events are generated from the data by fixed rules.
The month shown is when the change became visible in the reported figures, assuming a 60-day lag after each quarter end; it is not an announcement date.

Where price and fundamentals disagree, market-wide Rewind the whole market to any month

Monthly history95 months · 2019-01 to 2026-11
MonthP/ERevenue (TTM)ROEROCEDebt / Equity
2026-1124.1x₹766 cr4.9%7.0%0.1x
2026-1021.6x₹766 cr4.9%7.0%0.1x
2026-0927.1x₹766 cr4.9%7.0%0.1x
2026-0823.2x₹773 cr6.1%7.0%0.1x
2026-0726.0x₹773 cr6.1%7.0%0.1x
2026-0627.6x₹773 cr6.1%7.0%0.1x
2026-0517.9x₹762 cr10.3%6.0%0.2x
2026-0418.5x₹762 cr10.3%6.0%0.2x
2026-0312.2x₹762 cr10.3%6.0%0.2x
2026-0219.5x₹778 cr8.3%6.0%0.2x
2026-0121.1x₹778 cr8.3%6.0%0.2x
2025-1223.9x₹778 cr8.3%6.0%0.2x
2025-1127.1x₹805 cr7.7%6.0%0.2x
2025-1028.9x₹805 cr7.7%6.0%0.2x
2025-0930.0x₹805 cr7.7%6.0%0.2x
2025-0830.0x₹865 cr6.8%6.0%0.2x
2025-0731.8x₹865 cr6.8%6.0%0.2x
2025-0635.9x₹865 cr6.8%6.0%0.2x
2025-05107.9x₹931 cr2.3%6.0%0.1x
2025-0487.1x₹931 cr2.3%6.0%0.1x
2025-0397.0x₹931 cr2.3%6.0%0.1x
2025-0233.0x₹994 cr6.4%6.0%0.1x
2025-0158.8x₹994 cr6.4%6.0%0.1x
2024-1271.2x₹994 cr6.4%6.0%0.1x
2024-1166.1x₹1024 cr6.4%6.0%0.1x
2024-1061.7x₹1024 cr6.4%6.0%0.1x
2024-0946.6x₹1024 cr6.4%6.0%0.1x
2024-0857.5x₹1031 cr5.4%6.0%0.1x
2024-0746.2x₹1031 cr5.4%6.0%0.1x
2024-0644.5x₹1031 cr5.4%6.0%0.1x
2024-0537.1x₹1080 cr6.4%8.0%0.1x
2024-0443.5x₹1080 cr6.4%8.0%0.1x
2024-0340.6x₹1080 cr6.4%8.0%0.1x
2024-0245.7x₹1080 cr6.4%8.0%0.1x
2024-0148.2x₹1080 cr6.4%8.0%0.1x
2023-1251.2x₹1080 cr6.4%8.0%0.1x
2023-1148.3x₹1080 cr6.4%8.0%0.1x
2023-1052.5x₹1080 cr6.4%8.0%0.1x
2023-0957.1x₹1080 cr6.4%8.0%0.1x
2023-0853.3x₹1080 cr6.4%8.0%0.1x
2023-0748.5x₹1080 cr6.4%8.0%0.1x
2023-0638.6x₹1080 cr6.4%8.0%0.1x
2023-0531.6x₹895 cr6.7%4.0%0.2x
2023-0428.7x₹895 cr6.7%4.0%0.2x
2023-0319.7x₹895 cr6.7%4.0%0.2x
2023-0219.4x₹895 cr6.7%4.0%0.2x
2023-0121.3x₹895 cr6.7%4.0%0.2x
2022-1220.5x₹895 cr6.7%4.0%0.2x
2022-1122.6x₹895 cr6.7%4.0%0.2x
2022-1021.6x₹895 cr6.7%4.0%0.2x
2022-0923.2x₹895 cr6.7%4.0%0.2x
2022-0825.5x₹895 cr6.7%4.0%0.2x
2022-0727.0x₹895 cr6.7%4.0%0.2x
2022-0620.6x₹895 cr6.7%4.0%0.2x
2022-05434.4x₹709 cr0.4%0.0%0.3x
2022-04546.7x₹709 cr0.4%0.0%0.3x
2022-03552.3x₹709 cr0.4%0.0%0.3x
2022-02575.4x₹709 cr0.4%0.0%0.3x
2022-01687.9x₹709 cr0.4%0.0%0.3x
2021-12604.2x₹709 cr0.4%0.0%0.3x
2021-11550.0x₹709 cr0.4%0.0%0.3x
2021-10402.1x₹709 cr0.4%0.0%0.3x
2021-09396.0x₹709 cr0.4%0.0%0.3x
2021-08362.7x₹709 cr0.4%0.0%0.3x
2021-07454.2x₹709 cr0.4%0.0%0.3x
2021-06313.8x₹709 cr0.4%0.0%0.3x
2021-0514.3x₹746 cr4.2%6.0%0.3x
2021-0411.8x₹746 cr4.2%6.0%0.3x
2021-0310.8x₹746 cr4.2%6.0%0.3x
2021-0211.2x₹746 cr4.2%6.0%0.3x
2021-0111.5x₹746 cr4.2%6.0%0.3x
2020-1212.5x₹746 cr4.2%6.0%0.3x
2020-1112.5x₹746 cr4.2%6.0%0.3x
2020-108.8x₹746 cr4.2%6.0%0.3x
2020-099.2x₹746 cr4.2%6.0%0.3x
2020-089.9x₹746 cr4.2%6.0%0.3x
2020-078.2x₹746 cr4.2%6.0%0.3x
2020-067.3x₹746 cr4.2%6.0%0.3x
2020-0519.8x₹695 cr1.2%8.0%0.3x
2020-0424.6x₹695 cr1.2%8.0%0.3x
2020-0320.5x₹695 cr1.2%8.0%0.3x
2020-0229.4x₹695 cr1.2%8.0%0.3x
2020-0132.4x₹695 cr1.2%8.0%0.3x
2019-1236.1x₹695 cr1.2%8.0%0.3x
2019-1135.4x₹695 cr1.2%8.0%0.3x
2019-1026.5x₹695 cr1.2%8.0%0.3x
2019-0925.0x₹695 cr1.2%8.0%0.3x
2019-0832.0x₹695 cr1.2%8.0%0.3x
2019-0734.3x₹695 cr1.2%8.0%0.3x
2019-0649.6x₹695 cr1.2%8.0%0.3x
2019-0513.0x₹421 cr7.9%11.0%0.2x
2019-0410.7x₹421 cr7.9%11.0%0.2x
2019-0312.2x₹421 cr7.9%11.0%0.2x
2019-0210.6x₹421 cr7.9%11.0%0.2x
2019-0111.8x₹421 cr7.9%11.0%0.2x

Methodology and data notes

Methodology

Methodology and data notes

All figures come from public exchange prices and screener.in financial statements. Quarterly and annual results are shown from 60 days after the period end, so a month never uses a result before it would plausibly have been published. Statements are the latest versions, which may include later restatements.

Sector medians, percentiles and indices use today's listed companies in the sector (survivorship bias). Prices are adjusted for splits and bonus issues; around a corporate action the fundamentals may lag the price by up to a month, and affected sections are hidden.

The return decomposition uses price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count. The reverse DCF uses a fixed 12% cost of equity, a 10-year horizon and a 15x terminal P/E, and is an illustration only. Events, flags and twins follow fixed rules and thresholds described next to each section.

Feedback