अApnaFunda

TCI EXPRESS LIMITED (TCIEXP)

Transportation · Air Freight/Couriers · figures to Nov '26

Quality scoreHow the business itself ranks against its sector peers on profitability, 3-year growth and leverage. 50 is the middle of the sector.59 / 100
Profitability 55Growth 21Balance sheet 100
Momentum scoreHow strong the recent trend is: 3-month price change, 12-month improvement in earnings and the rise in FII + DII holding, among companies above ₹500 cr.33 / 100
Price 34Earnings 39FII/DII 26

Share price

Closing priceAdjusted for splits and bonus issues.

₹481.75 latest close · −5.1% over the last 90 sessions

₹450₹500₹550Jul 3Jul 29Aug 24Sep 17Oct 14Nov 9 ₹450₹500₹550Jul 3Sep 4Nov 9

₹481.75 month-end · −17.3% over 12 months

₹450₹500₹550Nov '25Jan '26Apr '26Jun '26Sep '26Nov '26 ₹450₹500₹550Nov '25May '26Nov '26

₹481.75 month-end · −65.7% over 3 years

₹500₹1,000₹1,500Nov '23Jun '24Jan '25Sep '25Apr '26Nov '26 ₹500₹1,000₹1,500Nov '23May '25Nov '26

₹481.75 month-end · −69.3% since Jun '23

₹500₹1,000₹1,500Jun '23Feb '24Oct '24Jul '25Mar '26Nov '26 ₹500₹1,000₹1,500Jun '23Mar '25Nov '26

52-week range ₹447.55 to ₹698.15 · 1-year volatility 41.8%

Was the rally earned?

-17%share price, 1 yearMultiple-driven

Mostly the multiple.

  • Most of the fall came from investors paying a lower multiple (P/E 26.9x to 22.5x); per-share earnings took off 1 point.
  • The share count barely moved.
Net profit growth: +1 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+1 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: −17 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−17 ptsP/E changeShare count change: −1 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−1 ptsShare count changeShare price: −17%−17%Share priceNet profit growth: +1 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+1ProfitP/E change: −17 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−17P/EShare count change: −1 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−1SharesShare price: −17%−17%Share price
Net profit growth+1 ptsNet profit was little changed.
P/E change-17 ptsThe P/E fell from 26.9x to 22.5x, which lowers the price.
Share count change-1 ptsShare count was little changed. More shares would count against the price.
-66%share price, 3 yearsEarnings and multiple

Both mattered.

  • Per-share earnings took off 32 points and the multiple took off 33 points (P/E 38.7x to 22.5x).
  • The share count barely moved.
Net profit growth: −32 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).−32 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: −33 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−33 ptsP/E changeShare count change: 0 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.0 ptsShare count changeShare price: −66%−66%Share priceNet profit growth: −32 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).−32ProfitP/E change: −33 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−33P/EShare count change: 0 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.0SharesShare price: −66%−66%Share price
Net profit growth-32 ptsNet profit fell about 41%, which lowers the price.
P/E change-33 ptsThe P/E fell from 38.7x to 22.5x, which lowers the price.
Share count change0 ptsShare count was little changed. More shares would count against the price.
What do "pts" mean?

"pts" are percentage points of the share price return. The parts add up to the total shown for each period. Because price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count, higher profit pushes the price up, a higher P/E pushes it up, and more shares push it down.

Example: if the price rose 34% and profit growth accounts for +58 pts while a lower P/E accounts for -24 pts, then 58 - 24 = 34. The +58 is not the profit growth rate itself: it is the part of the price move that profit growth explains.

Not shown for 5 years: earnings were negative at one end, or there is not enough history.

Net profit is trailing twelve months as reported with a 60-day lag.

Compare this with DELHIVERY

How rough has the ride been?

Maximum drawdown-81.8%not yet recovered
1-year volatility41.8%annualised
Beta vs sector index0.513-year daily, correlation 0.36
Volume spikes10last 90 sessions, 5x the 50-day median

Drawdown from peak

0%−25%−50%−75%2020202120222023202420252026−81.8% 0%−25%−50%−75%2020202220242026−81.8%
Largest drawdowns

-81.8% (2021-12 peak to 2026-10 low, not yet recovered)

-43.2% (2020-02 peak to 2020-04 low, recovered 2020-12)

-27.7% (2019-03 peak to 2019-08 low, recovered 2019-10)

Most recent volume spikes

2026-10-26: 15.2x the 50-day median, price +0.6% that day

2026-09-30: 24.7x the 50-day median, price -1.9% that day

2026-09-29: 172.1x the 50-day median, price +9.4% that day

Beta is the slope of daily returns against a market-cap-weighted index of the sector's other listed companies, built from today's constituents (so it excludes companies no longer listed).

Is it expensive against its own past and its peers?

22.5xP/E todayNear its historic low
Against its own history10th percentile
CheapestMedian 28.8xDearest

Usual range 23.5x to 38.6x since 2023-06.

Against Transportation22.5x vs 15.9x
This company
22.5x
Sector median
15.9x

41% above the Transportation median.

15.9x25.2x34.5x43.7xJun '23Mar '24Dec '24Sep '25Jun '26Nov '2615.9x25.2x34.5x43.7xJun '23Aug '24Oct '25Nov '26
P/E (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianTransportation median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/B (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianTransportation median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/S (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianTransportation median
How to read this

Shaded band: 10th to 90th percentile of the company's own P/E history; dotted line: its median; orange line: sector median (companies with a positive multiple, at least 5 in the sector).

Sector figures are built from today's listed companies, so they exclude companies that are no longer listed.

All terms explained in the glossary →

How Transportation is valued

Where does it rank among Transportation peers?

Each cell is the company's percentile rank among its Transportation peers (non-financial companies) that month.
Darker is better-ranked.
Rows marked ↓ are inverted (lower debt, shorter cash cycle and a lower P/E rank higher).

Where it ranks today

  • ROCE65th▲ 5 pts vs a year ago
  • Op. margin45thflat vs a year ago
  • Revenue growth29th▲ 8 pts vs a year ago
  • EPS growth39th▲ 15 pts vs a year ago
  • Debt/equity ↓86th▼ 9 pts vs a year ago
  • Cash cycle ↓54th▲ 6 pts vs a year ago
  • P/E ↓40th▲ 3 pts vs a year ago
  • 12M momentum34thflat vs a year ago

Rank history

ROCE
Op. margin
Revenue growth
EPS growth
Debt/equity ↓
Cash cycle ↓
P/E ↓
12M momentum
Dec '21Jul '22Jan '23Jul '23Jan '24Jul '24Jan '25Jul '25Jan '26Jul '26Nov '26
Lower rank Higher rank Not enough data

Percentiles use today's listed companies in the sector and need at least 5 peers with a value; grey cells have too few.
ROE is computed from net profit and book value where the source does not report it.

The Transportation sector page Watch it move against Transportation in the Observatory

What is the price implying?

~11%annual earnings growth implied by the price

At a P/E of 16.8x, the price would imply about 11.3%/yr earnings growth for 10 years under the same assumptions, but it is not ranked.

Fewer than six years of annual earnings are available, which is too little to measure delivered growth.

“Implied growth” is what the current price would require under our stated assumptions, not what we expect.

What prices imply across Transportation The market-wide Expectations lists

Key figures

Share Priceclose 9 Nov
₹481.75
P/E
22.5x
ROCE
14.0%
Market Cap
₹1852 cr
Revenue (TTM)
₹1264 cr
P/S
1.5x
P/B
2.3x
ROE
10.1%
Operating Margin
10.0%
Debt / Equity
0.1x
Promoter Holding
69.5%
12M Momentum
-17.3%

52-week range

₹447.55₹698.15
14% of the way from its 52-week low to its high

Price risk

1Y volatility
41.8%
Beta vs sector
1-year daily
0.68

Balance sheet & cash

Interest cover
operating profit ÷ interest
57.0x
Cash from profit, 3Y
operating cash flow ÷ net profit
1.19x
Share count, 1Y
unchanged

Are profits backed by cash?

5 of 6checks within range1 near a threshold
Other income reliance11%Within range

Other income as a share of pre-tax profit (trailing twelve months): 10.6%. Bands: below 15%, 15% to 35%, above 35%.

Tax rate26%Within range

Median quarterly effective tax rate over about 2.5 years: 26.0%. Bands: 15% to 35%, 5% to 15% or 35% to 50%, outside 5% to 50%.

Cash conversion1.19xWithin range

Operating cash flow divided by net profit over the last three fiscal years: 1.19x (cash from operations ₹355 cr, net profit ₹299 cr). Bands: 0.8x and above, 0.5x to 0.8x, below 0.5x.

Free cash flow3 of 4 yrsNear threshold

Fiscal years with positive free cash flow in the last 4: 3. Bands: at least 80% of years, 40% to 80%, below 40%.

Receivable days vs history+3 daysWithin range

Debtor days are above the median of the previous three fiscal years by 3 days (70 vs 67). Bands: under 15 days, 15 to 45, over 45.

Capital work in progress5% of fixed assetsWithin range

Capital work-in-progress is 5% of fixed assets. Bands: not rising or up to 30%; rising for three years and above 30%; rising and above 60%.

Payable days—Not enough data

Not enough reported data to compute this.

Tap a check to see how it is measured

How to read this

Each check is a named rule with fixed thresholds, not a score. Annual statements are the latest restated figures, so a past year may differ from what was originally reported.

All terms explained in the glossary →

Who has been buying and selling?

  • Over 3 years, FIIs trimmed 2.2 pts.
  • The number of shareholders fell from 52,120 to 48,357 (-7%) between Sep 2023 and Jun 2026.

Holdings, Jun '26

How each group changed

GroupSep '23Jun '26Change
Promoters69.6%69.5%-0.2 pts
FIIs3.0%0.8%-2.3 pts
DIIs8.8%8.9%0.0 pts
Public and others18.5%20.9%+2.4 pts

Number of shareholders

48,357shareholders-7% since Sep '23
48k50k52k53k Sep '23Jun '24Mar '25Dec '25Jun '26
Sep '23: 52,120
Dec '23: 53,421
Mar '24: 49,661
Jun '24: 49,315
Sep '24: 49,707
Dec '24: 53,379
Mar '25: 52,543
Jun '25: 51,187
Sep '25: 50,623
Dec '25: 49,726
Mar '26: 48,018
Jun '26: 48,357
48k50k52k53k Sep '23Sep '24Sep '25Jun '26
Sep '23: 52,120
Dec '23: 53,421
Mar '24: 49,661
Jun '24: 49,315
Sep '24: 49,707
Dec '24: 53,379
Mar '25: 52,543
Jun '25: 51,187
Sep '25: 50,623
Dec '25: 49,726
Mar '26: 48,018
Jun '26: 48,357

Quarterly shareholding as reported, labelled by the quarter it covers (it becomes visible about two months later).
Shareholder counts are only available for recent quarters.

This quarter's smart-money board

What happened next to similar setups

−15.6%typical 12-month return vs the marketBelow the base rate
  • We found 50 past situations where a non-financial company looked like TCI EXPRESS LIMITED today on valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, price momentum, size and volatility.
  • Over the following 12 months the middle half of them returned −25% to +7% vs the market, against −4% for all non-financial companies in the same months.
  • The analogs' median sat below that base rate (gap −11.6%, 80% range −17.8% to −2.0%), but the matches cluster in only 6 distinct 12-month windows.

Where the 50 outcomes landed

−100%−50%0%+50%+100%
ONMOBILE · Mar 2022: −44.5% vs market
FAIRCHEMOR · Dec 2024: −43.8% vs market
BHAGERIA · Feb 2022: −43.2% vs market
GREENPANEL · Sep 2025: −41.0% vs market
GAEL · Mar 2024: −38.3% vs market
NOCIL · Aug 2024: −32.1% vs market
EXCELINDUS · Nov 2020: −29.3% vs market
BALMLAWRIE · Mar 2021: −29.1% vs market
LXCHEM · May 2025: −29.0% vs market
PLASTIBLEN · Feb 2021: −28.0% vs market
PPAP · Apr 2020: −27.0% vs market
IOLCP · Jul 2023: −25.7% vs market
GUJALKALI · Jun 2020: −25.7% vs market
LINC · Jan 2025: −22.6% vs market
VAIBHAVGBL · May 2023: −21.7% vs market
BANCOINDIA · Mar 2021: −21.6% vs market
JTEKTINDIA · Feb 2024: −21.5% vs market
MATRIMONY · Apr 2025: −21.3% vs market
BUTTERFLY · Sep 2025: −19.7% vs market
HONDAPOWER · Feb 2024: −19.3% vs market
SHRIPISTON · Aug 2021: −18.1% vs market
HERITGFOOD · May 2020: −16.5% vs market
INDNIPPON · May 2022: −16.2% vs market
GALAXYSURF · Apr 2025: −16.0% vs market
BHARATRAS · Dec 2024: −15.9% vs market
SHREEPUSHK · Dec 2021: −15.2% vs market
TTKHLTCARE · Feb 2020: −9.9% vs market
ALBERTDAVD · Oct 2020: −7.7% vs market
LUXIND · Apr 2025: −4.5% vs market
AVANTIFEED · Mar 2023: −4.0% vs market
HARSHA · Apr 2025: −3.5% vs market
JTLIND · Jun 2025: −1.7% vs market
LUMAXTECH · Apr 2021: +1.3% vs market
RALLIS · Aug 2023: +1.6% vs market
SASKEN · Sep 2024: +1.8% vs market
MAYURUNIQ · Nov 2022: +3.7% vs market
MMP · Aug 2021: +5.9% vs market
TCI · Jan 2023: +7.3% vs market
ALLDIGI · Oct 2022: +13.9% vs market
DODLA · Sep 2023: +16.0% vs market
CIEINDIA · Oct 2020: +21.2% vs market
KRSNAA · Mar 2024: +23.7% vs market
KRBL · Jun 2022: +30.1% vs market
SUBROS · Dec 2024: +32.4% vs market
IFGLEXPOR · Feb 2020: +32.6% vs market
STARCEMENT · Sep 2024: +37.4% vs market
BOROLTD · Aug 2021: +58.4% vs market
GRAUWEIL · Aug 2022: +82.4% vs market
GABRIEL · Nov 2024: +123.5% vs market
INFOBEAN · Apr 2025: +123.6% vs market
Similar setups −15.6%All companies −4.0%← worse than the marketbetter than the market →

Each dot is one past situation (hover or tap for details) · Solid dots are the closest matches, listed below · Shaded is the middle half of all companies in the same months · 2 beyond the range shown, drawn at the edge

Similar setups' median
−15.6%
All companies' median
−4.0%
Beat the market
36% vs 46%

50 past situations · 50 companies · 35 months · 2020–2025

The closest matches

CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
JTEKTINDIA
Consumer Durables
Feb 2024 48x— +43%−14% −22%
PLASTIBLEN
Process Industries
Feb 2021 16x16% +27%−14% −28%
GABRIEL
Producer Manufacturing
Nov 2024 33x— +5%−19% +124%
BANCOINDIA
Producer Manufacturing
Mar 2021 13x13% +116%−18% −22%
INDNIPPON
Producer Manufacturing
May 2022 23x12% +13%−34% −16%
Show the other 3 matches
CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
GAEL
Consumer Non-Durables
Mar 2024 22x18% +38%−22% −38%
MAYURUNIQ
Process Industries
Nov 2022 22x18% −4%−26% +4%
BHARATRAS
Process Industries
Dec 2024 26x12% +12%−27% −16%
How reliable is this?

Matched on P/E, P/S, ROCE, operating margin, debt/equity, interest cover, revenue growth, 12-month momentum, drawdown from 12-month high, size and volatility. Closest on: drawdown from 12-month high, 12-month momentum and P/S. One match per company and at most 7 from any one month.

Independent periods: the matches fall in 6 distinct 12-month windows. Matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, so fewer windows means less evidence.

How this is built

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to TCI EXPRESS LIMITED. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

Methodology

How historical analogs are built

Data as of 2026-11-09. Outcome pool: Jan 2020 to Oct 2025.

For every company we look at the situation it is in today (valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, 12-month price momentum, drawdown, size and volatility) and find past company-months that looked most like it. We then show what happened to those past situations over the following 12 months, measured against the ApnaFunda All index and against the base rate. It describes history. It does not predict anything.

What is compared

FeatureWeightNon-financialFinancial
P/E1yesyes
P/S1yes—
P/B1—yes
ROCE1yes—
operating margin1yes—
ROE1—yes
debt/equity0.75yes—
interest cover0.5yes—
revenue growth0.75yesyes
12-month momentum1yesyes
drawdown from 12-month high0.75yesyes
size0.75yesyes
volatility0.5yesyes

Weights were set by judgement before any outcome was looked at and are never tuned on results. Loss-making companies (negative P/E or net profit) are only matched with other loss-making companies. Banks, NBFCs and insurers are compared only with each other and use a different feature set. Every feature is converted, month by month, to its rank among companies in the same pool in that month, so a P/E of 30 in a hot market and a P/E of 22 in a cold one can match if both were equally expensive for their time. Only that month's data is used.

How closeness and the sample are defined

Distance is the weighted root-mean-square gap between the standardised features both companies have. A match needs at least 70% of the query's feature weight, a distance of at most 0.9, and 30 matches at minimum to be shown. We keep up to 50 matches with these exclusions: never the company itself, one match per company (its closest month), and at most 7 from any one calendar month so a single market episode cannot dominate.

Base rate

The base rate is the distribution of 12-month returns, relative to the market, of every eligible company-month in the same pool, with each month weighted to match the months the analogs came from. It answers: how did a random company do in these same months? Because matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, we also report the number of distinct 12-month windows behind a result, and a bootstrap that resamples months decides whether the analog median differs from the base rate at all. "Not meaningfully different" is the usual outcome and the page copy is written for it.

Limits you should know

  • One market period. The outcome pool covers 2020–2025 only (70 months), including the 2020 crash and the 2020–21 rally.
  • Survivorship. Only companies listed today are included. Delisted and bankrupt companies are missing, which flatters past outcomes, particularly for distressed-looking setups.
  • Price return only. Dividends are excluded, and the benchmark is an ApnaFunda market-cap-weighted index of the same listed companies, not an official index.
  • Reporting lag. Fundamentals are matched on an assumed 60-day lag after the quarter end, not on real announcement dates.
  • Pools: non-financial: 98,395 company-months from 2019 companies; financial: 5,659 company-months from 108 companies. 2349 companies currently have a result; the rest are suppressed because too few comparable situations exist.

Does it work? A walk-forward check

The walk-forward check has not been run for this build, so skill is shown as not yet measured.

Disclaimer

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to any company shown. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

What else looks like this?

Companies with the most similar financial profile today, regardless of industry.

Consumer Durables
70%similar
P/Evolatility
Producer Manufacturing
67%similar
ROCErevenue growth
Process Industries
66%similar
debt/equityvolatility
Process Industries
66%similar
P/Epromoter holding
Industrial Services
66%similar
ROCEvolatility
Transportation
46%similar
P/Erevenue
Transportation
36%similar
revenueEPS growth
Transportation
36%similar
volatilitymarket cap

Similarity is statistical, based on reported metrics; it does not imply similar business quality or future returns.

What changed?

30 events since Oct '21

  1. OctPriceFell 82% from the Dec 2021 peak to the Oct 2026 low.
  2. OctValuationP/E fell below the 10th percentile of its own history to date (22.4x).
  3. OctPriceVolume reached 15.2x its 50-day median on 2026-10-26; price +0.6% that day.
  4. SepResultsRevenue (TTM) reached a new high of ₹1,264 cr.
  5. SepPeer rankSlipped to the 3rd quartile of Transportation on operating margin (from the 2nd quartile).
  6. JulPriceVolume reached 202.7x its 50-day median on 2026-07-09; price +10.9% that day.
  7. JunPeer rankMoved into the 2nd quartile of Transportation on operating margin (from the 3rd quartile).
  8. JunPriceVolume reached 311.3x its 50-day median on 2026-06-24; price +16.6% that day.
Show 22 earlier events
  1. FebPriceVolume reached 17.0x its 50-day median on 2026-02-05; price +2.0% that day.
  2. JanValuationP/E fell below the 10th percentile of its own history to date (25.5x).
  3. DecPeer rankMoved into the 3rd quartile of Transportation on EPS growth (from the bottom quartile).
  4. OctPriceVolume reached 5.8x its 50-day median on 2025-10-20; price +0.8% that day.
  5. SepPriceVolume reached 11.9x its 50-day median on 2025-09-16; price -0.8% that day.
  6. JunPeer rankSlipped to the 2nd quartile of Transportation on ROCE (from the top quartile).
  7. JunPriceVolume reached 22.7x its 50-day median on 2025-06-03; price +5.4% that day.
  8. MarPeer rankSlipped to the 3rd quartile of Transportation on operating margin (from the 2nd quartile).
  9. JanPriceVolume reached 5.6x its 50-day median on 2025-01-30; price +1.2% that day.
  10. NovPriceVolume reached 7.5x its 50-day median on 2024-11-25; price -2.5% that day.
  11. AugPriceVolume reached 6.4x its 50-day median on 2024-08-27; price +4.0% that day.
  12. JunResultsRevenue (TTM) reached a new high of ₹1,254 cr.
  13. MayPriceVolume reached 8.8x its 50-day median on 2024-05-13; price -8.2% that day.
  14. FebPriceVolume reached 5.1x its 50-day median on 2024-02-28; price -3.2% that day.
  15. NovPriceVolume reached 7.5x its 50-day median on 2023-11-16; price +4.1% that day.
  16. JulPriceVolume reached 46.8x its 50-day median on 2023-07-26; price +5.2% that day.
  17. MayPriceVolume reached 10.9x its 50-day median on 2023-05-30; price +5.1% that day.
  18. FebPriceVolume reached 24.1x its 50-day median on 2023-02-02; price -9.3% that day.
  19. NovPriceVolume reached 5.9x its 50-day median on 2022-11-01; price -1.0% that day.
  20. JulPriceVolume reached 8.3x its 50-day median on 2022-07-25; price +5.7% that day.
  21. JunPriceVolume reached 17.3x its 50-day median on 2022-06-03; price +4.1% that day.
  22. OctPriceVolume reached 26.1x its 50-day median on 2021-10-26; price +11.8% that day.

Events are generated from the data by fixed rules.
The month shown is when the change became visible in the reported figures, assuming a 60-day lag after each quarter end; it is not an announcement date.

Where price and fundamentals disagree, market-wide Rewind the whole market to any month

Monthly history42 months · 2023-06 to 2026-11
MonthP/ERevenue (TTM)ROEROCEDebt / Equity
2026-1122.5x₹1264 cr10.1%14.0%0.1x
2026-1022.4x₹1264 cr10.0%14.0%0.1x
2026-0924.3x₹1264 cr10.0%14.0%0.1x
2026-0825.8x₹1238 cr9.9%14.0%0.1x
2026-0725.6x₹1238 cr9.9%14.0%0.1x
2026-0624.2x₹1238 cr9.9%14.0%0.1x
2026-0522.3x₹1217 cr11.0%15.0%0.0x
2026-0423.8x₹1217 cr11.0%15.0%0.0x
2026-0320.9x₹1217 cr11.0%15.0%0.0x
2026-0225.6x₹1199 cr10.6%15.0%0.0x
2026-0125.5x₹1199 cr10.6%15.0%0.0x
2025-1227.0x₹1199 cr10.6%15.0%0.0x
2025-1126.9x₹1202 cr10.7%15.0%0.0x
2025-1031.4x₹1202 cr10.7%15.0%0.0x
2025-0934.0x₹1202 cr10.7%15.0%0.0x
2025-0830.5x₹1208 cr11.1%15.0%0.0x
2025-0731.4x₹1208 cr11.1%15.0%0.0x
2025-0634.0x₹1208 cr11.1%15.0%0.0x
2025-0529.8x₹1218 cr13.9%27.0%0.0x
2025-0426.4x₹1218 cr13.9%27.0%0.0x
2025-0324.0x₹1218 cr13.9%27.0%0.0x
2025-0223.4x₹1234 cr15.8%27.0%0.0x
2025-0126.8x₹1234 cr15.8%27.0%0.0x
2024-1228.1x₹1234 cr15.8%27.0%0.0x
2024-1126.4x₹1242 cr17.3%27.0%0.0x
2024-1030.7x₹1242 cr17.3%27.0%0.0x
2024-0934.5x₹1242 cr17.3%27.0%0.0x
2024-0832.9x₹1254 cr18.8%27.0%0.0x
2024-0735.1x₹1254 cr18.8%27.0%0.0x
2024-0635.6x₹1254 cr18.8%27.0%0.0x
2024-0529.1x₹1241 cr23.3%—0.0x
2024-0428.4x₹1241 cr23.3%—0.0x
2024-0328.2x₹1241 cr23.3%—0.0x
2024-0230.8x₹1241 cr23.3%—0.0x
2024-0137.9x₹1241 cr23.3%—0.0x
2023-1237.8x₹1241 cr23.3%—0.0x
2023-1138.7x₹1241 cr23.3%—0.0x
2023-1036.4x₹1241 cr23.3%—0.0x
2023-0939.9x₹1241 cr23.3%—0.0x
2023-0838.6x₹1241 cr23.3%—0.0x
2023-0743.7x₹1241 cr23.3%—0.0x
2023-0643.2x₹1241 cr23.3%—0.0x

Methodology and data notes

Methodology

Methodology and data notes

All figures come from public exchange prices and screener.in financial statements. Quarterly and annual results are shown from 60 days after the period end, so a month never uses a result before it would plausibly have been published. Statements are the latest versions, which may include later restatements.

Sector medians, percentiles and indices use today's listed companies in the sector (survivorship bias). Prices are adjusted for splits and bonus issues; around a corporate action the fundamentals may lag the price by up to a month, and affected sections are hidden.

The return decomposition uses price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count. The reverse DCF uses a fixed 12% cost of equity, a 10-year horizon and a 15x terminal P/E, and is an illustration only. Events, flags and twins follow fixed rules and thresholds described next to each section.

Feedback