अApnaFunda

POSITRON ENERGY (POSITRON)

Industrial Services · Engineering & Construction · figures to Nov '26

Quality scoreHow the business itself ranks against its sector peers on profitability, 3-year growth and leverage. 50 is the middle of the sector.65 / 100
Profitability 99Balance sheet 31

Share price

Closing priceAdjusted for splits and bonus issues.

₹273.25 latest close · +57.9% over the last 90 sessions

₹200₹250Jul 3Jul 29Aug 24Sep 17Oct 14Nov 9 ₹200₹250Jul 3Sep 4Nov 9

₹273.25 month-end · +10.2% over 12 months

₹100₹150₹200₹250Nov '25Jan '26Apr '26Jun '26Sep '26Nov '26 ₹100₹150₹200₹250Nov '25May '26Nov '26

₹273.25 month-end · −54.5% since Aug '24

₹200₹400₹600Aug '24Jan '25Jul '25Dec '25Jun '26Nov '26 ₹200₹400₹600Aug '24Oct '25Nov '26

52-week range ₹105.90 to ₹386.55 · 1-year volatility 60.6%

Was the rally earned?

+10%share price, 1 yearMultiple-driven

Partly.

  • Most of the rise came from investors paying a higher multiple (P/E 15.7x to 17.3x); per-share earnings added 0 points.
  • The share count barely moved.
P/E change: +10 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+10 ptsP/E changeShare price: +10%+10%Share priceP/E change: +10 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+10P/EShare price: +10%+10%Share price
Net profit growth0 ptsNet profit was little changed.
P/E change+10 ptsThe P/E rose from 15.7x to 17.3x, which lifts the price.
Share count change0 ptsShare count was little changed. More shares would count against the price.
What do "pts" mean?

"pts" are percentage points of the share price return. The parts add up to the total shown for each period. Because price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count, higher profit pushes the price up, a higher P/E pushes it up, and more shares push it down.

Example: if the price rose 34% and profit growth accounts for +58 pts while a lower P/E accounts for -24 pts, then 58 - 24 = 34. The +58 is not the profit growth rate itself: it is the part of the price move that profit growth explains.

Not shown for 3 years and 5 years: earnings were negative at one end, or there is not enough history.

Net profit is trailing twelve months as reported with a 60-day lag.

Compare this with LARSEN AND TOUBRO

How rough has the ride been?

Maximum drawdown-82.4%not yet recovered
1-year volatility60.6%annualised

Drawdown from peak

0%−25%−50%−75%20252026−82.2% 0%−25%−50%−75%20252026−82.2%
Largest drawdowns

-82.4% (2024-08 peak to 2026-03 low, not yet recovered)

Is it expensive against its own past and its peers?

17.3xP/E todayWithin its usual range
Against its own history50th percentile
CheapestMedian 17.9xDearest

Usual range 10.6x to 23.2x since 2024-08.

Against Industrial Services17.3x vs 14.0x
This company
17.3x
Sector median
14.0x

23% above the Industrial Services median.

7.1x17.3x27.6x37.9xAug '24Feb '25Aug '25Feb '26Aug '26Nov '267.1x17.3x27.6x37.9xAug '24May '25Feb '26Nov '26
P/E (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianIndustrial Services median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/B (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianIndustrial Services median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/S (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianIndustrial Services median
How to read this

Shaded band: 10th to 90th percentile of the company's own P/E history; dotted line: its median; orange line: sector median (companies with a positive multiple, at least 5 in the sector).

Sector figures are built from today's listed companies, so they exclude companies that are no longer listed.

All terms explained in the glossary →

How Industrial Services is valued

Where does it rank among Industrial Services peers?

Each cell is the company's percentile rank among its Industrial Services peers (non-financial companies) that month.
Darker is better-ranked.
Rows marked ↓ are inverted (lower debt, shorter cash cycle and a lower P/E rank higher).

Where it ranks today

  • ROCE99thflat vs a year ago
  • Revenue growth26th▼ 3 pts vs a year ago
  • EPS growth46th▼ 6 pts vs a year ago
  • Debt/equity ↓28thflat vs a year ago
  • Cash cycle ↓74th▲ 3 pts vs a year ago
  • P/E ↓38th▼ 22 pts vs a year ago
  • 12M momentum84th▲ 33 pts vs a year ago

Rank history

ROCE
Revenue growth
EPS growth
Debt/equity ↓
Cash cycle ↓
P/E ↓
12M momentum
Dec '21Jul '22Jan '23Jul '23Jan '24Jul '24Jan '25Jul '25Jan '26Jul '26Nov '26
Lower rank Higher rank Not enough data

Percentiles use today's listed companies in the sector and need at least 5 peers with a value; grey cells have too few.
ROE is computed from net profit and book value where the source does not report it.

The Industrial Services sector page Watch it move against Industrial Services in the Observatory

What is the price implying?

~27%annual earnings growth implied by the price

At a P/E of 51.8x, the price would imply about 26.8%/yr earnings growth for 10 years under the same assumptions, but it is not ranked.

Earnings figures have not updated recently, so the company is left out of the lists.

“Implied growth” is what the current price would require under our stated assumptions, not what we expect.

What prices imply across Industrial Services The market-wide Expectations lists

Key figures

Share Priceclose 9 Nov
₹273.25
P/E
17.3x
ROCE
65.0%
Market Cap
₹208 cr
Revenue (TTM)
₹134 cr
P/S
1.6x
P/B
13.9x
ROE
80.3%
Debt / Equity
0.7x
Promoter Holding
72.2%
12M Momentum
10.2%

52-week range

₹105.90₹386.55
60% of the way from its 52-week low to its high

Price risk

1Y volatility
60.6%
Beta vs sector
1-year daily
0.74

Balance sheet & cash

Interest cover
operating profit ÷ interest
13.0x
Cash from profit, 3Y
operating cash flow ÷ net profit
0.50x
Share count, 1Y
unchanged

Are profits backed by cash?

4 of 6checks within range2 near a threshold
Other income reliance8%Within range

Other income as a share of pre-tax profit (trailing twelve months): 8.3%. Bands: below 15%, 15% to 35%, above 35%.

Tax rate—Not enough data

Not enough reported data to compute this.

Cash conversion0.50xNear threshold

Operating cash flow divided by net profit over the last three fiscal years: 0.50x (cash from operations ₹6 cr, net profit ₹12 cr). Bands: 0.8x and above, 0.5x to 0.8x, below 0.5x.

Free cash flow2 of 4 yrsNear threshold

Fiscal years with positive free cash flow in the last 4: 2. Bands: at least 80% of years, 40% to 80%, below 40%.

Receivable days vs history0 daysWithin range

Debtor days are below the median of the previous three fiscal years by 0 days (40 vs 40). Bands: under 15 days, 15 to 45, over 45.

Capital work in progress0% of fixed assetsWithin range

Capital work-in-progress is 0% of fixed assets. Bands: not rising or up to 30%; rising for three years and above 30%; rising and above 60%.

Payable days0 days / 2 yrsWithin range

Days payable changed by 0 over two years. Bands: rise of up to 30 days; more than 30 days.

Tap a check to see how it is measured

How to read this

Each check is a named rule with fixed thresholds, not a score. Annual statements are the latest restated figures, so a past year may differ from what was originally reported.

All terms explained in the glossary →

What happened next to similar setups

−4.3%typical 12-month return vs the marketNot meaningfully different from the base rate
  • We found 50 past situations where a non-financial company looked like POSITRON ENERGY today on valuation, return on capital, debt, growth, price momentum, size and volatility.
  • Over the following 12 months the middle half of them returned −28% to +16% vs the market, against −5% for all non-financial companies in the same months.
  • The gap against the base rate (+0.4%, 80% range −8.8% to +4.1%) is within what chance and overlapping periods produce.

Where the 50 outcomes landed

−100%−50%0%+50%+100%
KCEIL · Aug 2025: −73.3% vs market
DHRUV · Apr 2024: −45.4% vs market
ALUWIND · Jul 2025: −41.3% vs market
DENEERS · Jul 2025: −41.0% vs market
ENSER · Aug 2025: −38.0% vs market
PIGL · May 2023: −36.6% vs market
TRF · Dec 2024: −35.2% vs market
GEEKAYWIRE · Sep 2024: −34.0% vs market
NAGREEKEXP · Mar 2024: −31.0% vs market
TARACHAND · Sep 2025: −30.5% vs market
AAKASH · May 2024: −30.2% vs market
EUROBOND · Oct 2025: −29.6% vs market
SHREEKARNI · May 2025: −28.2% vs market
BBTCL · Jan 2023: −27.7% vs market
RPPL · Jun 2022: −26.1% vs market
AKSHARCHEM · Apr 2020: −24.9% vs market
DCM · Jan 2025: −20.6% vs market
MHLXMIRU · Apr 2025: −19.7% vs market
NAVKARCORP · Aug 2022: −16.1% vs market
APOLLO · Jan 2021: −12.8% vs market
ORIENTCER · Jan 2021: −12.3% vs market
JAYBARMARU · Jan 2020: −9.7% vs market
SURANASOL · Jan 2020: −6.4% vs market
DCI · Jun 2025: −6.3% vs market
RKEC · Apr 2020: −4.3% vs market
ARCHIDPLY · Nov 2022: −4.3% vs market
BIRLACABLE · Jun 2023: −2.7% vs market
RITCO · Jul 2023: −0.6% vs market
SAKAR · May 2021: +1.5% vs market
KOTYARK · Nov 2023: +2.6% vs market
GULPOLY · Jun 2022: +4.2% vs market
GANECOS · Nov 2020: +5.2% vs market
KHFM · Jul 2023: +10.3% vs market
ARHAM · Nov 2024: +12.9% vs market
SIKKO · Mar 2025: +15.2% vs market
BIGBLOC · Jul 2023: +15.5% vs market
DHARMAJ · May 2025: +15.7% vs market
KAMDHENU · May 2021: +16.6% vs market
SHIVATEX · Apr 2020: +21.4% vs market
PREMIERPOL · Jul 2025: +30.0% vs market
MONTECARLO · Mar 2022: +35.3% vs market
MADHUSUDAN · Jun 2025: +41.8% vs market
MOS · May 2024: +53.0% vs market
TIRUPATIFL · Feb 2024: +93.2% vs market
REFEX · Jan 2023: +93.5% vs market
ASAHISONG · May 2020: +99.2% vs market
RATNAVEER · Sep 2025: +109.0% vs market
NDTV · Jan 2022: +125.0% vs market
DPABHUSHAN · Feb 2021: +158.2% vs market
STEELXIND · Apr 2020: +210.6% vs market
Similar setups −4.3%All companies −4.7%← worse than the marketbetter than the market →

Each dot is one past situation (hover or tap for details) · Solid dots are the closest matches, listed below · Shaded is the middle half of all companies in the same months · 4 beyond the range shown, drawn at the edge

Similar setups' median
−4.3%
All companies' median
−4.7%
Beat the market
44% vs 45%

50 past situations · 50 companies · 33 months · 2020–2025

The closest matches

CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
BBTCL
Process Industries
Jan 2023 22x— +15%−21% −28%
RPPL
Process Industries
Jun 2022 21x— +30%−35% −26%
KCEIL
Industrial Services
Aug 2025 18x— −11%−29% −73%
ASAHISONG
Process Industries
May 2020 7x— −36%−39% +99%
AAKASH
Energy Minerals
May 2024 31x— +75%−19% −30%
Show the other 3 matches
CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
NAVKARCORP
Transportation
Aug 2022 10x— +45%−25% −16%
MHLXMIRU
Process Industries
Apr 2025 25x— +9%−31% −20%
APOLLO
Electronic Technology
Jan 2021 18x— +64%−18% −13%
How reliable is this?

Matched on P/E, P/S, ROCE, debt/equity, interest cover, revenue growth, 12-month momentum, drawdown from 12-month high, size and volatility. Closest on: 12-month momentum, size and drawdown from 12-month high. Not used (unavailable for this company): operating margin. One match per company and at most 7 from any one month.

Independent periods: the matches fall in 6 distinct 12-month windows. Matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, so fewer windows means less evidence.

How this is built

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to POSITRON ENERGY. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

Methodology

How historical analogs are built

Data as of 2026-11-09. Outcome pool: Jan 2020 to Oct 2025.

For every company we look at the situation it is in today (valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, 12-month price momentum, drawdown, size and volatility) and find past company-months that looked most like it. We then show what happened to those past situations over the following 12 months, measured against the ApnaFunda All index and against the base rate. It describes history. It does not predict anything.

What is compared

FeatureWeightNon-financialFinancial
P/E1yesyes
P/S1yes—
P/B1—yes
ROCE1yes—
operating margin1yes—
ROE1—yes
debt/equity0.75yes—
interest cover0.5yes—
revenue growth0.75yesyes
12-month momentum1yesyes
drawdown from 12-month high0.75yesyes
size0.75yesyes
volatility0.5yesyes

Weights were set by judgement before any outcome was looked at and are never tuned on results. Loss-making companies (negative P/E or net profit) are only matched with other loss-making companies. Banks, NBFCs and insurers are compared only with each other and use a different feature set. Every feature is converted, month by month, to its rank among companies in the same pool in that month, so a P/E of 30 in a hot market and a P/E of 22 in a cold one can match if both were equally expensive for their time. Only that month's data is used.

How closeness and the sample are defined

Distance is the weighted root-mean-square gap between the standardised features both companies have. A match needs at least 70% of the query's feature weight, a distance of at most 0.9, and 30 matches at minimum to be shown. We keep up to 50 matches with these exclusions: never the company itself, one match per company (its closest month), and at most 7 from any one calendar month so a single market episode cannot dominate.

Base rate

The base rate is the distribution of 12-month returns, relative to the market, of every eligible company-month in the same pool, with each month weighted to match the months the analogs came from. It answers: how did a random company do in these same months? Because matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, we also report the number of distinct 12-month windows behind a result, and a bootstrap that resamples months decides whether the analog median differs from the base rate at all. "Not meaningfully different" is the usual outcome and the page copy is written for it.

Limits you should know

  • One market period. The outcome pool covers 2020–2025 only (70 months), including the 2020 crash and the 2020–21 rally.
  • Survivorship. Only companies listed today are included. Delisted and bankrupt companies are missing, which flatters past outcomes, particularly for distressed-looking setups.
  • Price return only. Dividends are excluded, and the benchmark is an ApnaFunda market-cap-weighted index of the same listed companies, not an official index.
  • Reporting lag. Fundamentals are matched on an assumed 60-day lag after the quarter end, not on real announcement dates.
  • Pools: non-financial: 98,395 company-months from 2019 companies; financial: 5,659 company-months from 108 companies. 2349 companies currently have a result; the rest are suppressed because too few comparable situations exist.

Does it work? A walk-forward check

The walk-forward check has not been run for this build, so skill is shown as not yet measured.

Disclaimer

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to any company shown. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

What changed?

5 events since Sep '25

  1. AugValuationP/E fell below the 10th percentile of its own history to date (10.4x).
  2. JunInstitutionsFII + DII holding fell 3.6 pts over 2 quarters to 3.3%.
  3. JunPeer rankSlipped to the 3rd quartile of Industrial Services on EPS growth (from the 2nd quartile).
  4. MarPriceFell 82% from the Aug 2024 peak to the Mar 2026 low.
  5. SepPeer rankMoved into the 2nd quartile of Industrial Services on EPS growth (from the 3rd quartile).

Events are generated from the data by fixed rules.
The month shown is when the change became visible in the reported figures, assuming a 60-day lag after each quarter end; it is not an announcement date.

Where price and fundamentals disagree, market-wide Rewind the whole market to any month

Monthly history28 months · 2024-08 to 2026-11
MonthP/ERevenue (TTM)ROEROCEDebt / Equity
2026-1117.3x₹134 cr80.3%65.0%0.7x
2026-1012.7x₹134 cr80.3%65.0%0.7x
2026-0915.0x₹134 cr80.3%65.0%0.7x
2026-0810.4x₹134 cr80.3%65.0%0.7x
2026-0710.7x₹134 cr80.3%65.0%0.7x
2026-0611.3x₹134 cr80.3%65.0%0.7x
2026-0512.4x₹134 cr80.3%65.0%0.7x
2026-0412.6x₹134 cr80.3%65.0%0.7x
2026-037.1x₹134 cr80.3%65.0%0.7x
2026-0210.1x₹134 cr80.3%65.0%0.7x
2026-0111.7x₹134 cr80.3%65.0%0.7x
2025-1212.9x₹134 cr80.3%65.0%0.7x
2025-1115.7x₹134 cr80.3%65.0%0.7x
2025-1024.0x₹134 cr80.3%65.0%0.7x
2025-0920.4x₹134 cr80.3%65.0%0.7x
2025-0819.2x₹134 cr80.3%65.0%0.7x
2025-0719.8x₹134 cr80.3%65.0%0.7x
2025-0620.6x₹134 cr80.3%65.0%0.7x
2025-0521.6x₹134 cr80.3%65.0%0.7x
2025-0422.9x₹134 cr80.3%65.0%0.7x
2025-0318.6x₹134 cr80.3%65.0%0.7x
2025-0219.6x₹134 cr80.3%65.0%0.7x
2025-0116.9x₹134 cr80.3%65.0%0.7x
2024-1219.8x₹134 cr80.3%65.0%0.7x
2024-1121.0x₹134 cr80.3%65.0%0.7x
2024-1022.7x₹134 cr80.3%65.0%0.7x
2024-0926.0x₹134 cr80.3%65.0%0.7x
2024-0837.9x₹134 cr80.3%65.0%0.7x

Methodology and data notes

Methodology

Methodology and data notes

All figures come from public exchange prices and screener.in financial statements. Quarterly and annual results are shown from 60 days after the period end, so a month never uses a result before it would plausibly have been published. Statements are the latest versions, which may include later restatements.

Sector medians, percentiles and indices use today's listed companies in the sector (survivorship bias). Prices are adjusted for splits and bonus issues; around a corporate action the fundamentals may lag the price by up to a month, and affected sections are hidden.

The return decomposition uses price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count. The reverse DCF uses a fixed 12% cost of equity, a 10-year horizon and a 15x terminal P/E, and is an illustration only. Events, flags and twins follow fixed rules and thresholds described next to each section.

Feedback