अApnaFunda

PRABHA ENERGY LIMITED (PRABHA)

Utilities · Alternative Power Generation · figures to Nov '26

Quality scoreHow the business itself ranks against its sector peers on profitability, 3-year growth and leverage. 50 is the middle of the sector.46 / 100
Profitability 25Balance sheet 66
Momentum scoreHow strong the recent trend is: 3-month price change, 12-month improvement in earnings and the rise in FII + DII holding, among companies above ₹500 cr.88 / 100
Price 95Earnings 81

Share price

Closing priceAdjusted for splits and bonus issues.

₹202.55 latest close · +36.8% over the last 90 sessions

₹150₹200₹250Jul 3Jul 29Aug 24Sep 17Oct 14Nov 9 ₹150₹200₹250Jul 3Sep 4Nov 9

₹202.55 month-end · +3.4% over 12 months

₹150₹175₹200₹225Nov '25Jan '26Apr '26Jun '26Sep '26Nov '26 ₹150₹175₹200₹225Nov '25May '26Nov '26

₹202.55 month-end · +15.8% since Mar '25

₹150₹200₹250Mar '25Jul '25Nov '25Mar '26Jul '26Nov '26 ₹150₹200₹250Mar '25Jan '26Nov '26

52-week range ₹137.91 to ₹262.80 · 1-year volatility 46.2%

How rough has the ride been?

Maximum drawdown-53.2%not yet recovered
1-year volatility46.2%annualised
Beta vs sector index0.663-year daily, correlation 0.29
Volume spikes13last 90 sessions, 5x the 50-day median

Drawdown from peak

0%−20%−40%2026−53.2% 0%−20%−40%2026−53.2%
Largest drawdowns

-53.2% (2025-07 peak to 2026-07 low, not yet recovered)

-26.4% (2025-04 peak to 2025-05 low, recovered 2025-06)

-22.6% (2025-03 peak to 2025-03 low, recovered 2025-04)

Most recent volume spikes

2026-09-15: 6.1x the 50-day median, price -2.1% that day

2026-09-11: 16.3x the 50-day median, price -1.2% that day

2026-09-09: 13.1x the 50-day median, price -2.7% that day

Beta is the slope of daily returns against a market-cap-weighted index of the sector's other listed companies, built from today's constituents (so it excludes companies no longer listed).

Where does it rank among Utilities peers?

Each cell is the company's percentile rank among its Utilities peers (non-financial companies) that month.
Darker is better-ranked.
Rows marked ↓ are inverted (lower debt, shorter cash cycle and a lower P/E rank higher).

Where it ranks today

  • ROCE6thflat vs a year ago
  • Op. margin45th▲ 40 pts vs a year ago
  • Revenue growth93rd
  • Debt/equity ↓65th▼ 7 pts vs a year ago
  • Cash cycle ↓86th▲ 34 pts vs a year ago
  • P/E ↓2nd
  • 12M momentum76th

Rank history

ROCE
Op. margin
Revenue growth
Debt/equity ↓
Cash cycle ↓
P/E ↓
12M momentum
Dec '21Jul '22Jan '23Jul '23Jan '24Jul '24Jan '25Jul '25Jan '26Jul '26Nov '26
Lower rank Higher rank Not enough data

Percentiles use today's listed companies in the sector and need at least 5 peers with a value; grey cells have too few.
ROE is computed from net profit and book value where the source does not report it.

The Utilities sector page Watch it move against Utilities in the Observatory

What is the price implying?

~106%annual earnings growth implied by the price

At a P/E of 6474.7x, the price would imply about 105.5%/yr earnings growth for 10 years under the same assumptions, but it is not ranked.

Fewer than six years of annual earnings are available, which is too little to measure delivered growth.

“Implied growth” is what the current price would require under our stated assumptions, not what we expect.

What prices imply across Utilities The market-wide Expectations lists

Key figures

Share Priceclose 9 Nov
₹202.55
P/E
2893.6x
ROCE
-0.1%
Market Cap
₹3162 cr
Revenue (TTM)
₹7 cr
P/S
474.7x
P/B
7.3x
ROE
0.3%
Operating Margin
18.9%
Debt / Equity
0.4x
Promoter Holding
74.9%
12M Momentum
3.4%

52-week range

₹137.91₹262.80
52% of the way from its 52-week low to its high

Price risk

1Y volatility
46.2%
Beta vs sector
1-year daily
0.72

Balance sheet & cash

Debt service
no meaningful debt
Cash from profit, 3Y
operating cash flow ÷ net profit
-2.00x
low
Share count, 1Y
unchanged

Are profits backed by cash?

0 of 4checks within range4 beyond a threshold
Other income reliance144%Beyond threshold

Other income as a share of pre-tax profit (trailing twelve months): 144.1%. Bands: below 15%, 15% to 35%, above 35%.

Tax rate-13%Beyond threshold

Median quarterly effective tax rate over about 2.5 years: -12.5%. Bands: 15% to 35%, 5% to 15% or 35% to 50%, outside 5% to 50%.

Cash conversion—Not enough data

Not enough reported data to compute this.

Free cash flow0 of 4 yrsBeyond threshold

Fiscal years with positive free cash flow in the last 4: 0. Bands: at least 80% of years, 40% to 80%, below 40%.

Receivable days vs history—Not enough data

Not enough reported data to compute this.

Capital work in progress93% of fixed assetsBeyond threshold

Capital work-in-progress is 93% of fixed assets. Bands: not rising or up to 30%; rising for three years and above 30%; rising and above 60%.

Payable days—Not enough data

Not enough reported data to compute this.

Tap a check to see how it is measured

How to read this

Each check is a named rule with fixed thresholds, not a score. Annual statements are the latest restated figures, so a past year may differ from what was originally reported.

All terms explained in the glossary →

Who has been buying and selling?

  • Over 2 years, promoters trimmed 5.3 pts; FIIs added 1.2 pts.
  • The number of shareholders rose from 13,306 to 14,240 (+7%) between Dec 2024 and Jun 2026.

Holdings, Jun '26

How each group changed

GroupDec '24Jun '26Change
Promoters80.2%74.9%-5.3 pts
FIIs0.6%1.8%+1.2 pts
DIIs0.0%0.1%+0.1 pts
Public and others19.2%23.2%+4.0 pts

Number of shareholders

14,240shareholders+7% since Dec '24
13k14k14k14k Dec '24Jun '25Dec '25Jun '26
Dec '24: 13,306
Mar '25: 13,167
Jun '25: 13,221
Sep '25: 13,617
Dec '25: 13,379
Mar '26: 13,711
Jun '26: 14,240
13k14k14k14k Dec '24Jun '25Dec '25Jun '26
Dec '24: 13,306
Mar '25: 13,167
Jun '25: 13,221
Sep '25: 13,617
Dec '25: 13,379
Mar '26: 13,711
Jun '26: 14,240

Quarterly shareholding as reported, labelled by the quarter it covers (it becomes visible about two months later).
Shareholder counts are only available for recent quarters.

This quarter's smart-money board

What happened next to similar setups

−11.6%typical 12-month return vs the marketNot meaningfully different from the base rate
  • We found 50 past situations where a non-financial company looked like PRABHA ENERGY LIMITED today on valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, price momentum, size and volatility.
  • Over the following 12 months the middle half of them returned −25% to +26% vs the market, against −7% for all non-financial companies in the same months.
  • The gap against the base rate (−4.4%, 80% range −11.9% to +8.6%) is within what chance and overlapping periods produce.

Where the 50 outcomes landed

−100%−50%0%+50%+100%
VAKRANGEE · Oct 2024: −67.9% vs market
DHANI · Dec 2020: −61.7% vs market
SEPC · Nov 2024: −58.4% vs market
TEJASNET · Aug 2024: −52.0% vs market
KAYNES · Oct 2025: −50.6% vs market
INOXWIND · Feb 2025: −47.3% vs market
EIFFL · Mar 2020: −41.1% vs market
IMAGICAA · Oct 2024: −34.6% vs market
HESTERBIO · Jul 2024: −33.6% vs market
ASHIANA · Apr 2024: −29.4% vs market
SERVOTECH · Sep 2024: −26.9% vs market
HINDOILEXP · May 2023: −26.5% vs market
HEXATRADEX · May 2022: −25.9% vs market
BATAINDIA · Jul 2022: −22.8% vs market
SINCLAIR · Aug 2025: −22.6% vs market
GENUSPOWER · Aug 2024: −22.1% vs market
SUNTECK · Jun 2024: −22.0% vs market
BPL · Jan 2024: −21.6% vs market
MAHLIFE · Jul 2023: −20.7% vs market
INOXGREEN · Sep 2025: −20.4% vs market
TARC · Dec 2021: −18.4% vs market
MAANALU · Jun 2024: −16.6% vs market
MAXESTATES · Jun 2025: −14.5% vs market
PROZONER · May 2020: −13.7% vs market
VIPIND · Jul 2022: −13.4% vs market
SAPPHIRE · Nov 2022: −9.9% vs market
MIDHANI · Jun 2024: −7.3% vs market
OLECTRA · Mar 2022: −2.6% vs market
ITDC · Dec 2022: +0.1% vs market
SOFTTECH · Aug 2025: +1.1% vs market
NYKAA · Apr 2024: +8.2% vs market
ZYDUSWELL · Jan 2020: +8.2% vs market
KERNEX · Mar 2025: +13.0% vs market
KIOCL · Aug 2020: +16.9% vs market
GENESYS · Mar 2024: +17.5% vs market
PARAS · Jan 2025: +18.3% vs market
ITI · Jan 2020: +19.0% vs market
RATEGAIN · May 2023: +28.9% vs market
POLICYBZR · Jul 2024: +32.4% vs market
ETERNAL · Aug 2024: +35.9% vs market
TAJGVK · Mar 2023: +37.2% vs market
GODREJPROP · May 2023: +39.2% vs market
PHOENIXLTD · Mar 2023: +44.0% vs market
PTCIL · Aug 2025: +46.5% vs market
ASTERDM · Aug 2024: +60.3% vs market
MICEL · May 2023: +70.7% vs market
AZAD · Aug 2025: +73.7% vs market
DIACABS · Oct 2025: +138.6% vs market
ZENTEC · Apr 2023: +158.3% vs market
CARTRADE · Jul 2024: +167.6% vs market
Similar setups −11.6%All companies −7.2%← worse than the marketbetter than the market →

Each dot is one past situation (hover or tap for details) · Solid dots are the closest matches, listed below · Shaded is the middle half of all companies in the same months · 3 beyond the range shown, drawn at the edge

Similar setups' median
−11.6%
All companies' median
−7.2%
Beat the market
44% vs 42%

50 past situations · 50 companies · 31 months · 2020–2025

The closest matches

CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
MAXESTATES
Finance
Jun 2025 196x3% +8%−27% −15%
PROZONER
Finance
May 2020 132x4% −31%−33% −14%
MAHLIFE
Finance
Jul 2023 100x2% +29%−4% −21%
ZENTEC
Technology Services
Apr 2023 1164x2% +50%−14% +158%
INOXWIND
Producer Manufacturing
Feb 2025 243x4% 0%−41% −47%
Show the other 3 matches
CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
PTCIL
Producer Manufacturing
Aug 2025 343x8% −6%−19% +47%
POLICYBZR
Technology Services
Jul 2024 982x2% +99%−4% +32%
RATEGAIN
Technology Services
May 2023 484x3% +30%−9% +29%
How reliable is this?

Matched on P/E, P/S, ROCE, operating margin, debt/equity, revenue growth, 12-month momentum, drawdown from 12-month high, size and volatility. Closest on: 12-month momentum, drawdown from 12-month high and volatility. Not used (unavailable for this company): interest cover. One match per company and at most 7 from any one month.

Independent periods: the matches fall in 5 distinct 12-month windows. Matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, so fewer windows means less evidence.

How this is built

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to PRABHA ENERGY LIMITED. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

Methodology

How historical analogs are built

Data as of 2026-11-09. Outcome pool: Jan 2020 to Oct 2025.

For every company we look at the situation it is in today (valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, 12-month price momentum, drawdown, size and volatility) and find past company-months that looked most like it. We then show what happened to those past situations over the following 12 months, measured against the ApnaFunda All index and against the base rate. It describes history. It does not predict anything.

What is compared

FeatureWeightNon-financialFinancial
P/E1yesyes
P/S1yes—
P/B1—yes
ROCE1yes—
operating margin1yes—
ROE1—yes
debt/equity0.75yes—
interest cover0.5yes—
revenue growth0.75yesyes
12-month momentum1yesyes
drawdown from 12-month high0.75yesyes
size0.75yesyes
volatility0.5yesyes

Weights were set by judgement before any outcome was looked at and are never tuned on results. Loss-making companies (negative P/E or net profit) are only matched with other loss-making companies. Banks, NBFCs and insurers are compared only with each other and use a different feature set. Every feature is converted, month by month, to its rank among companies in the same pool in that month, so a P/E of 30 in a hot market and a P/E of 22 in a cold one can match if both were equally expensive for their time. Only that month's data is used.

How closeness and the sample are defined

Distance is the weighted root-mean-square gap between the standardised features both companies have. A match needs at least 70% of the query's feature weight, a distance of at most 0.9, and 30 matches at minimum to be shown. We keep up to 50 matches with these exclusions: never the company itself, one match per company (its closest month), and at most 7 from any one calendar month so a single market episode cannot dominate.

Base rate

The base rate is the distribution of 12-month returns, relative to the market, of every eligible company-month in the same pool, with each month weighted to match the months the analogs came from. It answers: how did a random company do in these same months? Because matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, we also report the number of distinct 12-month windows behind a result, and a bootstrap that resamples months decides whether the analog median differs from the base rate at all. "Not meaningfully different" is the usual outcome and the page copy is written for it.

Limits you should know

  • One market period. The outcome pool covers 2020–2025 only (70 months), including the 2020 crash and the 2020–21 rally.
  • Survivorship. Only companies listed today are included. Delisted and bankrupt companies are missing, which flatters past outcomes, particularly for distressed-looking setups.
  • Price return only. Dividends are excluded, and the benchmark is an ApnaFunda market-cap-weighted index of the same listed companies, not an official index.
  • Reporting lag. Fundamentals are matched on an assumed 60-day lag after the quarter end, not on real announcement dates.
  • Pools: non-financial: 98,395 company-months from 2019 companies; financial: 5,659 company-months from 108 companies. 2349 companies currently have a result; the rest are suppressed because too few comparable situations exist.

Does it work? A walk-forward check

The walk-forward check has not been run for this build, so skill is shown as not yet measured.

Disclaimer

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to any company shown. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

What else looks like this?

Companies with the most similar financial profile today, regardless of industry.

Consumer Services
60%similar
ROCEP/E
Transportation
58%similar
promoter holdingvolatility
Process Industries
56%similar
operating marginmarket cap
SAL STEELSALSTEEL
Non-Energy Minerals
49%similar
ROCErevenue
Electronic Technology
44%similar
P/Epromoter holding
Utilities
40%similar
P/Epromoter holding
Utilities
15%similar
volatilitymarket cap
Utilities
0%similar
debt/equityvolatility

Similarity is statistical, based on reported metrics; it does not imply similar business quality or future returns.

What changed?

11 events since May '25

  1. SepPromoterPromoter holding fell 5.3 pts to 74.9%.
  2. SepPeer rankMoved into the 3rd quartile of Utilities on operating margin (from the bottom quartile).
  3. SepPriceVolume reached 284.0x its 50-day median on 2026-09-04; price +4.4% that day.
  4. JulPriceFell 53% from the Jul 2025 peak to the Jul 2026 low.
  5. JunResultsEPS (TTM) turned positive.
  6. AprPriceVolume reached 7.4x its 50-day median on 2026-04-08; price -3.3% that day.
  7. JanPriceVolume reached 15.5x its 50-day median on 2026-01-06; price +0.0% that day.
  8. JulPriceVolume reached 5.4x its 50-day median on 2025-07-02; price +2.9% that day.
Show 3 earlier events
  1. JunPriceRegained the 2025-04 peak, 1 month after the low.
  2. JunPriceVolume reached 11.6x its 50-day median on 2025-06-26; price +5.6% that day.
  3. MayPriceFell 26% from the Apr 2025 peak to the May 2025 low.

Events are generated from the data by fixed rules.
The month shown is when the change became visible in the reported figures, assuming a 60-day lag after each quarter end; it is not an announcement date.

Where price and fundamentals disagree, market-wide Rewind the whole market to any month

Monthly history21 months · 2025-03 to 2026-11
MonthP/ERevenue (TTM)ROEROCEDebt / Equity
2026-112893.6x₹7 cr0.3%-0.1%0.4x
2026-102600.3x₹7 cr0.3%-0.1%0.4x
2026-093171.9x₹7 cr0.3%-0.1%0.4x
2026-085115.3x₹6 cr0.1%-0.1%0.4x
2026-073697.8x₹6 cr0.1%-0.1%0.4x
2026-063840.0x₹6 cr0.1%-0.1%0.4x
2026-05—₹6 cr-0.1%-0.3%0.3x
2026-04—₹6 cr-0.1%-0.3%0.3x
2026-03—₹6 cr-0.1%-0.3%0.3x
2026-02—₹5 cr-0.3%-0.3%0.3x
2026-01—₹5 cr-0.3%-0.3%0.3x
2025-12—₹5 cr-0.3%-0.3%0.3x
2025-11—₹4 cr-0.3%-0.3%0.3x
2025-10—₹4 cr-0.3%-0.3%0.3x
2025-09—₹4 cr-0.3%-0.3%0.3x
2025-08—₹4 cr-0.3%-0.3%0.3x
2025-07—₹4 cr-0.3%-0.3%0.3x
2025-06—₹4 cr-0.3%-0.3%0.3x
2025-05—₹4 cr-0.1%-0.2%0.2x
2025-04—₹4 cr-0.1%-0.2%0.2x
2025-03—₹4 cr-0.1%-0.2%0.2x

Methodology and data notes

Methodology

Methodology and data notes

All figures come from public exchange prices and screener.in financial statements. Quarterly and annual results are shown from 60 days after the period end, so a month never uses a result before it would plausibly have been published. Statements are the latest versions, which may include later restatements.

Sector medians, percentiles and indices use today's listed companies in the sector (survivorship bias). Prices are adjusted for splits and bonus issues; around a corporate action the fundamentals may lag the price by up to a month, and affected sections are hidden.

The return decomposition uses price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count. The reverse DCF uses a fixed 12% cost of equity, a 10-year horizon and a 15x terminal P/E, and is an illustration only. Events, flags and twins follow fixed rules and thresholds described next to each section.

Feedback