अApnaFunda

RAMA TELECOM LIMITED (RTL)

Industrial Services · Engineering & Construction · figures to Nov '26

Quality scoreHow the business itself ranks against its sector peers on profitability, 3-year growth and leverage. 50 is the middle of the sector.51 / 100
Profitability 32Balance sheet 69

Passes these screensHigh MomentumNear 52-week high

Share price

Closing priceAdjusted for splits and bonus issues.

₹116.9 latest close · +35.5% over the last 90 sessions

₹80₹100₹120Apr 30Jun 8Jul 6Aug 7Oct 8Nov 9 ₹80₹100₹120Apr 30Jul 21Nov 9

₹116.9 month-end · +77.0% over 12 months

₹60₹80₹100₹120Nov '25Jan '26Apr '26Jun '26Sep '26Nov '26 ₹60₹80₹100₹120Nov '25May '26Nov '26

₹116.9 month-end · +79.8% since Jul '25

₹60₹80₹100₹120Jul '25Oct '25Jan '26May '26Aug '26Nov '26 ₹60₹80₹100₹120Jul '25Mar '26Nov '26

52-week range ₹54.00 to ₹116.90 · 1-year volatility 61.1%

Was the rally earned?

+77%share price, 1 yearMultiple-driven

Partly.

  • Most of the rise came from investors paying a higher multiple (P/E 11.3x to 53.1x); per-share earnings took off 131 points.
  • The share count barely moved.
Net profit growth: −131 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).−131 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: +208 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+208 ptsP/E changeShare price: +77%+77%Share priceNet profit growth: −131 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).−131ProfitP/E change: +208 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+208P/EShare price: +77%+77%Share price
Net profit growth-131 ptsNet profit fell about 62%, which lowers the price.
P/E change+208 ptsThe P/E rose from 11.3x to 53.1x, which lifts the price.
Share count change0 ptsShare count was little changed. More shares would count against the price.
What do "pts" mean?

"pts" are percentage points of the share price return. The parts add up to the total shown for each period. Because price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count, higher profit pushes the price up, a higher P/E pushes it up, and more shares push it down.

Example: if the price rose 34% and profit growth accounts for +58 pts while a lower P/E accounts for -24 pts, then 58 - 24 = 34. The +58 is not the profit growth rate itself: it is the part of the price move that profit growth explains.

Not shown for 3 years and 5 years: earnings were negative at one end, or there is not enough history.

Net profit is trailing twelve months as reported with a 60-day lag.

Compare this with LARSEN AND TOUBRO

How rough has the ride been?

Maximum drawdown-24.9%recovered 2026-10
1-year volatility61.1%annualised

Drawdown from peak

0%−10%−20%2026−22.9% 0%−10%−20%2026−22.9%
Largest drawdowns

-24.9% (2026-03 peak to 2026-10 low, recovered 2026-10)

-17.8% (2025-07 peak to 2025-11 low, recovered 2025-11)

-15.5% (2025-11 peak to 2026-02 low, recovered 2026-02)

Where does it rank among Industrial Services peers?

Each cell is the company's percentile rank among its Industrial Services peers (non-financial companies) that month.
Darker is better-ranked.
Rows marked ↓ are inverted (lower debt, shorter cash cycle and a lower P/E rank higher).

Where it ranks today

  • ROCE32nd▼ 66 pts vs a year ago
  • Revenue growth60th
  • EPS growth18th
  • Debt/equity ↓62nd▲ 4 pts vs a year ago
  • Cash cycle ↓31st▼ 9 pts vs a year ago
  • P/E ↓9th▼ 68 pts vs a year ago
  • 12M momentum97th

Rank history

ROCE
Revenue growth
EPS growth
Debt/equity ↓
Cash cycle ↓
P/E ↓
12M momentum
Dec '21Jul '22Jan '23Jul '23Jan '24Jul '24Jan '25Jul '25Jan '26Jul '26Nov '26
Lower rank Higher rank Not enough data

Percentiles use today's listed companies in the sector and need at least 5 peers with a value; grey cells have too few.
ROE is computed from net profit and book value where the source does not report it.

The Industrial Services sector page Watch it move against Industrial Services in the Observatory

What is the price implying?

~28%annual earnings growth implied by the price

At a P/E of 58.8x, the price would imply about 28.4%/yr earnings growth for 10 years under the same assumptions, but it is not ranked.

Fewer than six years of annual earnings are available, which is too little to measure delivered growth.

“Implied growth” is what the current price would require under our stated assumptions, not what we expect.

What prices imply across Industrial Services The market-wide Expectations lists

Key figures

Share Priceclose 9 Nov
₹116.90
P/E
53.1x
ROCE
11.9%
Market Cap
₹155 cr
Revenue (TTM)
₹50 cr
P/S
3.1x
P/B
3.7x
ROE
7.0%
Debt / Equity
0.3x
Promoter Holding
71.3%
12M Momentum
77.0%

52-week range

₹54.00₹116.90
100% of the way from its 52-week low to its high

Price risk

1Y volatility
61.1%
Beta vs sector
1-year daily
-0.05

Balance sheet & cash

Interest cover
operating profit ÷ interest
8.2x
Cash from profit, 3Y
operating cash flow ÷ net profit
-1.32x
low
Share count, 1Y
+38.9%

Are profits backed by cash?

1 of 4checks within range1 beyond a threshold
Other income reliance24%Near threshold

Other income as a share of pre-tax profit (trailing twelve months): 23.9%. Bands: below 15%, 15% to 35%, above 35%.

Tax rate—Not enough data

Not enough reported data to compute this.

Cash conversion-1.32xBeyond threshold

Operating cash flow divided by net profit over the last three fiscal years: -1.32x (cash from operations ₹-14.6 cr, net profit ₹11.1 cr). Bands: 0.8x and above, 0.5x to 0.8x, below 0.5x.

Free cash flow3 of 5 yrsNear threshold

Fiscal years with positive free cash flow in the last 5: 3. Bands: at least 80% of years, 40% to 80%, below 40%.

Receivable days vs history—Not enough data

Not enough reported data to compute this.

Capital work in progress0% of fixed assetsWithin range

Capital work-in-progress is 0% of fixed assets. Bands: not rising or up to 30%; rising for three years and above 30%; rising and above 60%.

Payable days—Not enough data

Not enough reported data to compute this.

Tap a check to see how it is measured

How to read this

Each check is a named rule with fixed thresholds, not a score. Annual statements are the latest restated figures, so a past year may differ from what was originally reported.

All terms explained in the glossary →

What happened next to similar setups

−12.2%typical 12-month return vs the marketNot meaningfully different from the base rate
  • We found 50 past situations where a non-financial company looked like RAMA TELECOM LIMITED today on valuation, return on capital, debt, growth, price momentum, size and volatility.
  • Over the following 12 months the middle half of them returned −43% to +48% vs the market, against −6% for all non-financial companies in the same months.
  • The gap against the base rate (−6.4%, 80% range −13.5% to +5.3%) is within what chance and overlapping periods produce.

Where the 50 outcomes landed

−100%−50%0%+50%+100%
DHRUV · Jan 2025: −76.4% vs market
FROG · Jan 2025: −66.2% vs market
OMFURN · Mar 2025: −63.8% vs market
DYNAMIC · Nov 2024: −63.4% vs market
KOTYARK · Feb 2024: −58.4% vs market
PILITA · May 2025: −57.4% vs market
TERASOFT · Sep 2025: −56.1% vs market
SONAMLTD · Oct 2024: −55.7% vs market
KRITIKA · Feb 2024: −54.9% vs market
AESTHETIK · Sep 2025: −53.3% vs market
DIGISPICE · Jun 2024: −50.3% vs market
SOMICONVEY · Jun 2021: −48.7% vs market
PANSARI · Dec 2021: −44.1% vs market
ORIENTBELL · Jun 2022: −38.9% vs market
MINDTECK · Dec 2021: −37.7% vs market
DUCOL · Oct 2025: −37.6% vs market
TPLPLASTEH · Jul 2024: −35.7% vs market
ALKALI · Apr 2020: −25.0% vs market
HPIL · Nov 2022: −19.4% vs market
STERTOOLS · Jan 2023: −19.1% vs market
KITEX · Nov 2024: −16.9% vs market
TIRUPATIFL · Oct 2024: −16.7% vs market
MBAPL · Mar 2020: −16.6% vs market
GRPLTD · Jun 2024: −15.9% vs market
MDL · Apr 2024: −12.3% vs market
ESFL · Sep 2024: −12.0% vs market
ARVEE · Aug 2021: −11.6% vs market
ROSSELLIND · Jul 2023: −9.4% vs market
MACOBSTECH · Aug 2025: −5.6% vs market
KABRAEXTRU · Dec 2021: −0.4% vs market
LOTUSEYE · Jul 2022: +11.6% vs market
VIMTALABS · Nov 2021: +14.4% vs market
BHANDARI · Nov 2021: +23.2% vs market
ICEMAKE · May 2023: +30.7% vs market
KOPRAN · Sep 2020: +32.3% vs market
LOKESHMACH · Aug 2022: +34.4% vs market
MAANALU · Feb 2021: +42.7% vs market
KANDARP · Apr 2025: +49.6% vs market
KRISHNADEF · Aug 2023: +69.5% vs market
MAHICKRA · Aug 2025: +70.2% vs market
AXISCADES · May 2025: +75.0% vs market
VIVIANA · Apr 2024: +85.2% vs market
SOUTHWEST · Oct 2020: +108.9% vs market
KERNEX · Dec 2021: +114.7% vs market
MARINE · Dec 2023: +116.0% vs market
FOCUS · Dec 2022: +117.2% vs market
SERVOTECH · Jan 2023: +167.0% vs market
JSLL · May 2023: +207.0% vs market
RMDRIP · Sep 2024: +239.6% vs market
APOLLO · Nov 2022: +297.0% vs market
Similar setups −12.2%All companies −5.8%← worse than the marketbetter than the market →

Each dot is one past situation (hover or tap for details) · Solid dots are the closest matches, listed below · Shaded is the middle half of all companies in the same months · 8 beyond the range shown, drawn at the edge

Similar setups' median
−12.2%
All companies' median
−5.8%
Beat the market
40% vs 43%

50 past situations · 50 companies · 33 months · 2020–2025

The closest matches

CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
SOUTHWEST
Energy Minerals
Oct 2020 35x8% +143%0% +109%
BHANDARI
Consumer Non-Durables
Nov 2021 —9% +311%0% +23%
KRISHNADEF
Electronic Technology
Aug 2023 62x— +194%0% +70%
SONAMLTD
Consumer Durables
Oct 2024 59x13% +125%0% −56%
JSLL
Health Services
May 2023 40x— +192%0% +207%
Show the other 3 matches
CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
MBAPL
Process Industries
Mar 2020 13x14% +18%— −17%
RMDRIP
Producer Manufacturing
Sep 2024 67x— +340%0% +240%
MINDTECK
Technology Services
Dec 2021 50x12% +280%0% −38%
How reliable is this?

Matched on P/E, P/S, ROCE, debt/equity, interest cover, revenue growth, 12-month momentum, drawdown from 12-month high, size and volatility. Closest on: 12-month momentum, P/E and P/S. Not used (unavailable for this company): operating margin. One match per company and at most 7 from any one month.

Independent periods: the matches fall in 6 distinct 12-month windows. Matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, so fewer windows means less evidence.

How this is built

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to RAMA TELECOM LIMITED. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

Methodology

How historical analogs are built

Data as of 2026-11-09. Outcome pool: Jan 2020 to Oct 2025.

For every company we look at the situation it is in today (valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, 12-month price momentum, drawdown, size and volatility) and find past company-months that looked most like it. We then show what happened to those past situations over the following 12 months, measured against the ApnaFunda All index and against the base rate. It describes history. It does not predict anything.

What is compared

FeatureWeightNon-financialFinancial
P/E1yesyes
P/S1yes—
P/B1—yes
ROCE1yes—
operating margin1yes—
ROE1—yes
debt/equity0.75yes—
interest cover0.5yes—
revenue growth0.75yesyes
12-month momentum1yesyes
drawdown from 12-month high0.75yesyes
size0.75yesyes
volatility0.5yesyes

Weights were set by judgement before any outcome was looked at and are never tuned on results. Loss-making companies (negative P/E or net profit) are only matched with other loss-making companies. Banks, NBFCs and insurers are compared only with each other and use a different feature set. Every feature is converted, month by month, to its rank among companies in the same pool in that month, so a P/E of 30 in a hot market and a P/E of 22 in a cold one can match if both were equally expensive for their time. Only that month's data is used.

How closeness and the sample are defined

Distance is the weighted root-mean-square gap between the standardised features both companies have. A match needs at least 70% of the query's feature weight, a distance of at most 0.9, and 30 matches at minimum to be shown. We keep up to 50 matches with these exclusions: never the company itself, one match per company (its closest month), and at most 7 from any one calendar month so a single market episode cannot dominate.

Base rate

The base rate is the distribution of 12-month returns, relative to the market, of every eligible company-month in the same pool, with each month weighted to match the months the analogs came from. It answers: how did a random company do in these same months? Because matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, we also report the number of distinct 12-month windows behind a result, and a bootstrap that resamples months decides whether the analog median differs from the base rate at all. "Not meaningfully different" is the usual outcome and the page copy is written for it.

Limits you should know

  • One market period. The outcome pool covers 2020–2025 only (70 months), including the 2020 crash and the 2020–21 rally.
  • Survivorship. Only companies listed today are included. Delisted and bankrupt companies are missing, which flatters past outcomes, particularly for distressed-looking setups.
  • Price return only. Dividends are excluded, and the benchmark is an ApnaFunda market-cap-weighted index of the same listed companies, not an official index.
  • Reporting lag. Fundamentals are matched on an assumed 60-day lag after the quarter end, not on real announcement dates.
  • Pools: non-financial: 98,395 company-months from 2019 companies; financial: 5,659 company-months from 108 companies. 2349 companies currently have a result; the rest are suppressed because too few comparable situations exist.

Does it work? A walk-forward check

The walk-forward check has not been run for this build, so skill is shown as not yet measured.

Disclaimer

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to any company shown. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

What changed?

2 events since Jun '26

  1. JulSharesShare count is up 38.9% over 12 months.
  2. JunPeer rankSlipped to the 3rd quartile of Industrial Services on ROCE (from the top quartile).

Events are generated from the data by fixed rules.
The month shown is when the change became visible in the reported figures, assuming a 60-day lag after each quarter end; it is not an announcement date.

Where price and fundamentals disagree, market-wide Rewind the whole market to any month

Monthly history17 months · 2025-07 to 2026-11
MonthP/ERevenue (TTM)ROEROCEDebt / Equity
2026-1153.1x₹50 cr7.0%11.9%0.3x
2026-1046.6x₹50 cr7.0%11.9%0.3x
2026-0936.0x₹50 cr7.0%11.9%0.3x
2026-0837.8x₹50 cr7.0%11.9%0.3x
2026-0738.1x₹50 cr7.0%11.9%0.3x
2026-0640.2x₹50 cr7.0%11.9%0.3x
2026-0513.9x₹42 cr46.8%44.6%0.3x
2026-0414.8x₹42 cr46.8%44.6%0.3x
2026-0314.3x₹42 cr46.8%44.6%0.3x
2026-0214.7x₹42 cr46.8%44.6%0.3x
2026-0110.9x₹42 cr46.8%44.6%0.3x
2025-1211.3x₹42 cr46.8%44.6%0.3x
2025-1111.3x₹42 cr46.8%44.6%0.3x
2025-1010.1x₹42 cr46.8%44.6%0.3x
2025-0910.8x₹42 cr46.8%44.6%0.3x
2025-0811.0x₹42 cr46.8%44.6%0.3x
2025-0711.2x₹42 cr46.8%44.6%0.3x

Methodology and data notes

Methodology

Methodology and data notes

All figures come from public exchange prices and screener.in financial statements. Quarterly and annual results are shown from 60 days after the period end, so a month never uses a result before it would plausibly have been published. Statements are the latest versions, which may include later restatements.

Sector medians, percentiles and indices use today's listed companies in the sector (survivorship bias). Prices are adjusted for splits and bonus issues; around a corporate action the fundamentals may lag the price by up to a month, and affected sections are hidden.

The return decomposition uses price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count. The reverse DCF uses a fixed 12% cost of equity, a 10-year horizon and a 15x terminal P/E, and is an illustration only. Events, flags and twins follow fixed rules and thresholds described next to each section.

Feedback