अApnaFunda
Menu

SMARTLINK HOLDINGS LIMITED (SMARTLINK)

Electronic Technology · Telecommunications Equipment · figures to Nov '26

Quality scoreHow the business itself ranks against its sector peers on profitability, 3-year growth and leverage. 50 is the middle of the sector.57 / 100
Profitability 26Growth 44Balance sheet 100

Passes these screensValue Pick

Compare withSTERLITE TECHNOLOGIESHFCLASTRA MICROWAVE PRODUCTS

Share price

Closing priceAdjusted for splits and bonus issues.

₹207.77 latest close · +19.5% over the last 90 sessions

₹175₹200₹225₹250Jul 3Jul 29Aug 24Sep 17Oct 14Nov 9 ₹175₹200₹225₹250Jul 3Sep 4Nov 9

₹207.77 month-end · +54.7% over 12 months

₹100₹150₹200Nov '25Jan '26Apr '26Jun '26Sep '26Nov '26 ₹100₹150₹200Nov '25May '26Nov '26

₹207.77 month-end · +23.9% over 3 years

₹100₹200₹300Nov '23Jun '24Jan '25Sep '25Apr '26Nov '26 ₹100₹200₹300Nov '23May '25Nov '26

₹207.77 month-end · +160.0% since Jan '19

₹100₹200₹300Jan '19Aug '20Mar '22Sep '23Apr '25Nov '26 ₹100₹200₹300Jan '19Dec '22Nov '26

52-week range ₹103.50 to ₹265.00 · 1-year volatility 52.4%

Was the rally earned?

+55%share price, 1 yearLower P/E held it back

Mostly yes, with a catch.

  • Per-share earnings added 73 points, but investors now pay less per rupee of profit (P/E 14.5x to 12.5x), which took 19 points back.
  • The share count barely moved.
Net profit growth: +73 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+73 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: −19 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−19 ptsP/E changeShare count change: 0 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.0 ptsShare count changeShare price: +55%+55%Share priceNet profit growth: +73 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+73ProfitP/E change: −19 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−19P/EShare count change: 0 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.0SharesShare price: +55%+55%Share price
Net profit growth+73 ptsNet profit rose about 79%, which lifts the price.
P/E change-19 ptsThe P/E fell from 14.5x to 12.5x, which lowers the price.
Share count change0 ptsShare count was little changed. More shares would count against the price.
+24%share price, 3 yearsMultiple-driven

Partly.

  • Most of the rise came from investors paying a higher multiple (P/E 8.7x to 12.5x); per-share earnings took off 17 points.
  • The share count barely moved.
Net profit growth: −15 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).−15 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: +41 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+41 ptsP/E changeShare count change: −1 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−1 ptsShare count changeShare price: +24%+24%Share priceNet profit growth: −15 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).−15ProfitP/E change: +41 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+41P/EShare count change: −1 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−1SharesShare price: +24%+24%Share price
Net profit growth-15 ptsNet profit fell about 13%, which lowers the price.
P/E change+41 ptsThe P/E rose from 8.7x to 12.5x, which lifts the price.
Share count change-1 ptsShare count was little changed. More shares would count against the price.
+103%share price, 5 yearsLower P/E held it back

Mostly yes, with a catch.

  • Per-share earnings added 110 points, but investors now pay less per rupee of profit (P/E 13.1x to 12.5x), which took 7 points back.
  • The share count fell 22%.
Net profit growth: +73 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+73 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: −7 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−7 ptsP/E changeShare count change: +37 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.+37 ptsShare count changeShare price: +103%+103%Share priceNet profit growth: +73 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+73ProfitP/E change: −7 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−7P/EShare count change: +37 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.+37SharesShare price: +103%+103%Share price
Net profit growth+73 ptsNet profit rose about 65%, which lifts the price.
P/E change-7 ptsThe P/E fell from 13.1x to 12.5x, which lowers the price.
Share count change+37 ptsShare count fell 22%, which lifts the price.
What do "pts" mean?

"pts" are percentage points of the share price return. The parts add up to the total shown for each period. Because price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count, higher profit pushes the price up, a higher P/E pushes it up, and more shares push it down.

Example: if the price rose 34% and profit growth accounts for +58 pts while a lower P/E accounts for -24 pts, then 58 - 24 = 34. The +58 is not the profit growth rate itself: it is the part of the price move that profit growth explains.

Net profit is trailing twelve months as reported with a 60-day lag.

Compare this with STERLITE TECHNOLOGIES

How rough has the ride been?

Maximum drawdown-69.2%not yet recovered
1-year volatility52.4%annualised

Drawdown from peak

0%−20%−40%−60%2020202120222023202420252026−67.1% 0%−20%−40%−60%2020202220242026−67.1%
Largest drawdowns

-69.2% (2024-09 peak to 2026-03 low, not yet recovered)

-59.0% (2022-01 peak to 2022-06 low, recovered 2024-05)

-51.7% (2019-06 peak to 2020-03 low, recovered 2021-06)

Is it expensive against its own past and its peers?

12.5xP/E todayWithin its usual range
Against its own history29th percentile
CheapestMedian 14.2xDearest

Usual range 9.2x to 25.4x since 2019-01.

Against Electronic Technology12.5x vs 55.3x
This company
12.5x
Sector median
55.3x

77% below the Electronic Technology median.

8.5x34.3x60.1x85.9xJan '19Aug '20Mar '22Oct '23May '25Nov '268.5x34.3x60.1x85.9xJan '19Sep '21May '24Nov '26
P/E (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianElectronic Technology median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/B (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianElectronic Technology median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/S (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianElectronic Technology median
How to read this

Shaded band: 10th to 90th percentile of the company's own P/E history; dotted line: its median; orange line: sector median (companies with a positive multiple, at least 5 in the sector).

Sector figures are built from today's listed companies, so they exclude companies that are no longer listed.

All terms explained in the glossary →

How Electronic Technology is valued

Where does it rank among Electronic Technology peers?

Each cell is the company's percentile rank among its Electronic Technology peers (non-financial companies) that month.
Darker is better-ranked.
Rows marked ↓ are inverted (lower debt, shorter cash cycle and a lower P/E rank higher).

Where it ranks today

  • ROCE30th▲ 13 pts vs a year ago
  • Op. margin22nd▲ 8 pts vs a year ago
  • Revenue growth71st▲ 44 pts vs a year ago
  • EPS growth80th▲ 31 pts vs a year ago
  • Debt/equity ↓85th▲ 4 pts vs a year ago
  • Cash cycle ↓80th▲ 14 pts vs a year ago
  • P/E ↓92ndflat vs a year ago
  • 12M momentum76th▲ 52 pts vs a year ago

Rank history

ROCE
Op. margin
Revenue growth
EPS growth
Debt/equity ↓
Cash cycle ↓
P/E ↓
12M momentum
Dec '21Jul '22Jan '23Jul '23Jan '24Jul '24Jan '25Jul '25Jan '26Jul '26Nov '26
Lower rank Higher rank Not enough data

Percentiles use today's listed companies in the sector and need at least 5 peers with a value; grey cells have too few.
ROE is computed from net profit and book value where the source does not report it.

The Electronic Technology sector page Watch it move against Electronic Technology in the Observatory

What is the price implying?

~14%annual earnings growth implied by the price

At a P/E of 18.5x, the price would imply about 14.4%/yr earnings growth for 10 years under the same assumptions, but it is not ranked.

Fewer than six years of annual earnings are available, which is too little to measure delivered growth.

“Implied growth” is what the current price would require under our stated assumptions, not what we expect.

What prices imply across Electronic Technology The market-wide Expectations lists

Key figures

Share Priceclose 9 Nov
₹207.77
P/E
12.5x
ROCE
9.0%
Market Cap
₹207 cr
Revenue (TTM)
₹298 cr
P/S
0.7x
P/B
1.0x
ROE
7.9%
Operating Margin
7.1%
Debt / Equity
0.0x
Promoter Holding
72.8%
12M Momentum
54.7%

52-week range

₹103.50₹265.00
65% of the way from its 52-week low to its high

Price risk

1Y volatility
52.4%
Beta vs sector
1-year daily
0.62

Balance sheet & cash

Interest cover
operating profit ÷ interest
25.4x
Cash from profit, 3Y
operating cash flow ÷ net profit
0.33x
low
Share count, 1Y
unchanged

Are profits backed by cash?

2 of 7checks within range2 beyond a threshold
Other income reliance51%Beyond threshold

Other income as a share of pre-tax profit (trailing twelve months): 51.4%. Bands: below 15%, 15% to 35%, above 35%.

Tax rate25%Within range

Median quarterly effective tax rate over about 2.5 years: 24.7%. Bands: 15% to 35%, 5% to 15% or 35% to 50%, outside 5% to 50%.

Cash conversion0.33xBeyond threshold

Operating cash flow divided by net profit over the last three fiscal years: 0.33x (cash from operations ₹9 cr, net profit ₹27 cr). Bands: 0.8x and above, 0.5x to 0.8x, below 0.5x.

Free cash flow2 of 5 yrsNear threshold

Fiscal years with positive free cash flow in the last 5: 2. Bands: at least 80% of years, 40% to 80%, below 40%.

Receivable days vs history+25 daysNear threshold

Debtor days are above the median of the previous three fiscal years by 25 days (121 vs 96). Bands: under 15 days, 15 to 45, over 45.

Capital work in progress3% of fixed assetsWithin range

Capital work-in-progress is 3% of fixed assets. Bands: not rising or up to 30%; rising for three years and above 30%; rising and above 60%.

Payable days+38 days / 2 yrsNear threshold

Days payable changed by +38 over two years. Bands: rise of up to 30 days; more than 30 days.

Tap a check to see how it is measured

How to read this

Each check is a named rule with fixed thresholds, not a score. Annual statements are the latest restated figures, so a past year may differ from what was originally reported.

All terms explained in the glossary →

Who has been buying and selling?

  • Over 3 years, promoters added 1.3 pts.
  • The number of shareholders fell from 12,402 to 11,028 (-11%) between Sep 2023 and Jun 2026.

Holdings, Jun '26

How each group changed

GroupSep '23Jun '26Change
Promoters71.5%72.8%+1.3 pts
FIIs0.0%0.0%0.0 pts
DIIs0.0%0.0%0.0 pts
Public and others28.5%27.1%-1.3 pts

Number of shareholders

11,028shareholders-11% since Sep '23
11k11k12k12k Sep '23Mar '24Sep '24Mar '25Dec '25Jun '26
Sep '23: 12,402
Dec '23: 12,217
Mar '24: 12,025
Jun '24: 11,691
Sep '24: 11,398
Dec '24: 11,429
Mar '25: 11,534
Jun '25: 11,568
Dec '25: 11,448
Jun '26: 11,028
 11k11k12k12k Sep '23Jun '24Mar '25Jun '26
Sep '23: 12,402
Dec '23: 12,217
Mar '24: 12,025
Jun '24: 11,691
Sep '24: 11,398
Dec '24: 11,429
Mar '25: 11,534
Jun '25: 11,568
Dec '25: 11,448
Jun '26: 11,028

Quarterly shareholding as reported, labelled by the quarter it covers (it becomes visible about two months later).
Shareholder counts are only available for recent quarters.

This quarter's smart-money board

What happened next to similar setups

+2.8%typical 12-month return vs the marketNot meaningfully different from the base rate
  • We found 50 past situations where a non-financial company looked like SMARTLINK HOLDINGS LIMITED today on valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, price momentum, size and volatility.
  • Over the following 12 months the middle half of them returned −27% to +42% vs the market, against −4% for all non-financial companies in the same months.
  • The gap against the base rate (+6.4%, 80% range −5.9% to +10.3%) is within what chance and overlapping periods produce.

Where the 50 outcomes landed

−100%−50%0%+50%+100%
SAIFL · Jul 2025: −84.2% vs market
ONDOOR · Nov 2024: −62.8% vs market
SPECTSTM · Apr 2025: −57.7% vs market
ALPHAGEO · Dec 2024: −49.0% vs market
NIRAJ · Jul 2025: −46.0% vs market
KRITINUT · Mar 2025: −43.1% vs market
DTIL · Jul 2021: −42.4% vs market
IFGLEXPOR · Jul 2021: −36.8% vs market
EXCELINDUS · Jul 2025: −31.0% vs market
GHCLTEXTIL · Dec 2024: −30.2% vs market
KITEX · Jul 2022: −30.1% vs market
RUBFILA · Oct 2025: −29.1% vs market
VASCONEQ · Sep 2023: −27.3% vs market
ALPA · Jan 2022: −26.1% vs market
JOCIL · Oct 2020: −23.9% vs market
TEXMOPIPES · Apr 2022: −22.6% vs market
SCHAND · Jun 2023: −17.7% vs market
GALLANTT · Jul 2021: −17.5% vs market
RUCHIRA · Nov 2022: −15.9% vs market
CHEMFAB · Oct 2022: −12.1% vs market
SESHAPAPER · Feb 2023: −8.4% vs market
PONNIERODE · Aug 2020: −6.4% vs market
MINDTECK · Jun 2024: −6.2% vs market
MODISONLTD · Aug 2024: +1.1% vs market
IZMO · Apr 2021: +1.4% vs market
CHEMBOND · Aug 2023: +4.2% vs market
NIITLTD · Jul 2021: +5.0% vs market
MMP · Jun 2022: +5.5% vs market
IFBAGRO · Sep 2025: +8.6% vs market
PDMJEPAPER · May 2024: +8.8% vs market
SEMAC · Apr 2020: +10.2% vs market
CLEDUCATE · Jan 2024: +10.5% vs market
AARVI · Aug 2022: +12.3% vs market
ANDHRAPAP · Dec 2022: +14.3% vs market
SHREEPUSHK · Mar 2025: +16.3% vs market
JINDRILL · Jun 2023: +26.0% vs market
HINDCON · Jun 2022: +39.4% vs market
JMA · Nov 2020: +42.4% vs market
BHAGERIA · Oct 2025: +71.1% vs market
MANAKSIA · May 2022: +74.8% vs market
NDRAUTO · Jun 2022: +88.7% vs market
DEEPINDS · Jul 2022: +93.8% vs market
TDPOWERSYS · Sep 2021: +96.4% vs market
WINDLAS · Mar 2024: +96.8% vs market
SHYAMCENT · Jun 2021: +98.4% vs market
DATAMATICS · Mar 2021: +110.2% vs market
EIMCOELECO · Sep 2023: +117.1% vs market
GOLDIAM · Mar 2020: +117.2% vs market
ADSL · Oct 2020: +165.2% vs market
NAHARPOLY · Jan 2021: +184.4% vs market
Similar setups +2.8%All companies −3.6%← worse than the marketbetter than the market →

Each dot is one past situation (hover or tap for details) · Solid dots are the closest matches, listed below · Shaded is the middle half of all companies in the same months · 5 beyond the range shown, drawn at the edge

Similar setups' median
+2.8%
All companies' median
−3.6%
Beat the market
54% vs 46%

50 past situations · 50 companies · 36 months · 2020–2025

The closest matches

CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
JOCIL
Process Industries		 Oct 2020 12x10% +94%−23% −24%
CHEMBOND
Process Industries		 Aug 2023 22x10% +125%−5% +4%
IZMO
Technology Services		 Apr 2021 8x6% +359%−8% +1%
AARVI
Commercial Services		 Aug 2022 13x14% +96%−13% +12%
ADSL
Technology Services		 Oct 2020 6x6% +59%−19% +165%
Show the other 3 matches
CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
SESHAPAPER
Process Industries		 Feb 2023 14x12% +69%−27% −8%
MODISONLTD
Producer Manufacturing		 Aug 2024 25x12% +115%−7% +1%
NAHARPOLY
Process Industries		 Jan 2021 6x10% +138%−13% +184%
How reliable is this?

Matched on P/E, P/S, ROCE, operating margin, debt/equity, interest cover, revenue growth, 12-month momentum, drawdown from 12-month high, size and volatility. Closest on: drawdown from 12-month high, size and P/E. One match per company and at most 7 from any one month.

Independent periods: the matches fall in 6 distinct 12-month windows. Matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, so fewer windows means less evidence.

How this is built

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to SMARTLINK HOLDINGS LIMITED. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

Methodology

How historical analogs are built

Data as of 2026-11-09. Outcome pool: Jan 2020 to Oct 2025.

For every company we look at the situation it is in today (valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, 12-month price momentum, drawdown, size and volatility) and find past company-months that looked most like it. We then show what happened to those past situations over the following 12 months, measured against the ApnaFunda All index and against the base rate. It describes history. It does not predict anything.

What is compared

FeatureWeightNon-financialFinancial
P/E1yesyes
P/S1yes—
P/B1—yes
ROCE1yes—
operating margin1yes—
ROE1—yes
debt/equity0.75yes—
interest cover0.5yes—
revenue growth0.75yesyes
12-month momentum1yesyes
drawdown from 12-month high0.75yesyes
size0.75yesyes
volatility0.5yesyes

Weights were set by judgement before any outcome was looked at and are never tuned on results. Loss-making companies (negative P/E or net profit) are only matched with other loss-making companies. Banks, NBFCs and insurers are compared only with each other and use a different feature set. Every feature is converted, month by month, to its rank among companies in the same pool in that month, so a P/E of 30 in a hot market and a P/E of 22 in a cold one can match if both were equally expensive for their time. Only that month's data is used.

How closeness and the sample are defined

Distance is the weighted root-mean-square gap between the standardised features both companies have. A match needs at least 70% of the query's feature weight, a distance of at most 0.9, and 30 matches at minimum to be shown. We keep up to 50 matches with these exclusions: never the company itself, one match per company (its closest month), and at most 7 from any one calendar month so a single market episode cannot dominate.

Base rate

The base rate is the distribution of 12-month returns, relative to the market, of every eligible company-month in the same pool, with each month weighted to match the months the analogs came from. It answers: how did a random company do in these same months? Because matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, we also report the number of distinct 12-month windows behind a result, and a bootstrap that resamples months decides whether the analog median differs from the base rate at all. "Not meaningfully different" is the usual outcome and the page copy is written for it.

Limits you should know

  • One market period. The outcome pool covers 2020–2025 only (70 months), including the 2020 crash and the 2020–21 rally.
  • Survivorship. Only companies listed today are included. Delisted and bankrupt companies are missing, which flatters past outcomes, particularly for distressed-looking setups.
  • Price return only. Dividends are excluded, and the benchmark is an ApnaFunda market-cap-weighted index of the same listed companies, not an official index.
  • Reporting lag. Fundamentals are matched on an assumed 60-day lag after the quarter end, not on real announcement dates.
  • Pools: non-financial: 98,395 company-months from 2019 companies; financial: 5,659 company-months from 108 companies. 2349 companies currently have a result; the rest are suppressed because too few comparable situations exist.

Does it work? A walk-forward check

The walk-forward check has not been run for this build, so skill is shown as not yet measured.

Disclaimer

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to any company shown. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

What changed?

25 events since Mar '20

  1. SepPeer rankSlipped to the bottom quartile of Electronic Technology on operating margin (from the 3rd quartile).
  2. JunResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned positive.
  3. JunPeer rankMoved into the 3rd quartile of Electronic Technology on ROCE (from the bottom quartile).
  4. JunDividendStarted paying a dividend (payout 15% of profit).
  5. MarResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned negative.
  6. MarPriceFell 69% from the Sep 2024 peak to the Mar 2026 low.
  7. MarPeer rankSlipped to the bottom quartile of Electronic Technology on EPS growth (from the 2nd quartile).
  8. DecResultsRevenue (TTM) reached a new high of ₹226 cr.
Show 17 earlier events
  1. DecPeer rankMoved into the 2nd quartile of Electronic Technology on EPS growth (from the 3rd quartile).
  2. SepResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned positive.
  3. JunPeer rankMoved into the 3rd quartile of Electronic Technology on EPS growth (from the bottom quartile).
  4. SepPriceRegained the 2024-05 peak, 1 month after the low.
  5. AugPriceFell 30% from the May 2024 peak to the Aug 2024 low.
  6. JunResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned negative.
  7. JunValuationP/E crossed above the 90th percentile of its own history to date (39.5x).
  8. JunPeer rankSlipped to the bottom quartile of Electronic Technology on EPS growth (from the top quartile).
  9. MayPriceRegained the 2022-01 peak, 23 months after the low.
  10. FebValuationP/E fell below the 10th percentile of its own history to date (8.8x).
  11. JunResultsRevenue (TTM) reached a new high of ₹163 cr.
  12. JunValuationP/E fell below the 10th percentile of its own history to date (8.5x).
  13. JunPeer rankMoved into the top quartile of Electronic Technology on EPS growth (from the 2nd quartile).
  14. JunPriceFell 59% from the Jan 2022 peak to the Jun 2022 low.
  15. JunResultsEPS (TTM) turned positive.
  16. JunPriceRegained the 2019-06 peak, 15 months after the low.
  17. MarPriceFell 52% from the Jun 2019 peak to the Mar 2020 low.

Events are generated from the data by fixed rules.
The month shown is when the change became visible in the reported figures, assuming a 60-day lag after each quarter end; it is not an announcement date.

Where price and fundamentals disagree, market-wide Rewind the whole market to any month

Monthly history95 months · 2019-01 to 2026-11
MonthP/ERevenue (TTM)ROEROCEDebt / Equity
2026-1112.5x₹298 cr7.9%9.0%0.0x
2026-1011.8x₹298 cr7.9%9.0%0.0x
2026-0912.8x₹298 cr7.9%9.0%0.0x
2026-0816.4x₹269 cr6.3%9.0%0.0x
2026-0715.2x₹269 cr6.3%9.0%0.0x
2026-0613.6x₹269 cr6.3%9.0%0.0x
2026-0515.8x₹235 cr5.2%3.0%0.0x
2026-0413.0x₹235 cr5.2%3.0%0.0x
2026-0310.3x₹235 cr5.2%3.0%0.0x
2026-0211.9x₹226 cr5.3%3.0%0.0x
2026-0112.2x₹226 cr5.3%3.0%0.0x
2025-1212.6x₹226 cr5.3%3.0%0.0x
2025-1114.5x₹211 cr4.7%3.0%0.0x
2025-1014.2x₹211 cr4.7%3.0%0.0x
2025-0915.4x₹211 cr4.7%3.0%0.0x
2025-0822.2x₹215 cr3.4%3.0%0.0x
2025-0722.0x₹215 cr3.4%3.0%0.0x
2025-0624.1x₹215 cr3.4%3.0%0.0x
2025-0513.9x₹225 cr6.0%5.0%0.2x
2025-0413.3x₹225 cr6.0%5.0%0.2x
2025-0311.0x₹225 cr6.0%5.0%0.2x
2025-0218.2x₹209 cr4.1%5.0%0.2x
2025-0123.3x₹209 cr4.1%5.0%0.2x
2024-1225.4x₹209 cr4.1%5.0%0.2x
2024-1125.3x₹205 cr4.1%5.0%0.2x
2024-1029.3x₹205 cr4.1%5.0%0.2x
2024-0936.9x₹205 cr4.1%5.0%0.2x
2024-0835.3x₹198 cr3.7%5.0%0.2x
2024-0743.0x₹198 cr3.7%5.0%0.2x
2024-0639.5x₹198 cr3.7%5.0%0.2x
2024-0514.1x₹163 cr10.3%2.0%0.2x
2024-0410.4x₹163 cr10.3%2.0%0.2x
2024-038.9x₹163 cr10.3%2.0%0.2x
2024-028.8x₹163 cr10.3%2.0%0.2x
2024-019.5x₹163 cr10.3%2.0%0.2x
2023-129.4x₹163 cr10.3%2.0%0.2x
2023-118.7x₹163 cr10.3%2.0%0.2x
2023-108.8x₹163 cr10.3%2.0%0.2x
2023-099.4x₹163 cr10.3%2.0%0.2x
2023-088.9x₹163 cr10.3%2.0%0.2x
2023-078.9x₹163 cr10.3%2.0%0.2x
2023-068.5x₹163 cr10.3%2.0%0.2x
2023-0515.4x₹80 cr6.1%4.0%0.2x
2023-0414.9x₹80 cr6.1%4.0%0.2x
2023-0314.2x₹80 cr6.1%4.0%0.2x
2023-0213.3x₹80 cr6.1%4.0%0.2x
2023-0113.0x₹80 cr6.1%4.0%0.2x
2022-1213.4x₹80 cr6.1%4.0%0.2x
2022-1114.4x₹80 cr6.1%4.0%0.2x
2022-1016.1x₹80 cr6.1%4.0%0.2x
2022-0912.2x₹80 cr6.1%4.0%0.2x
2022-0812.9x₹80 cr6.1%4.0%0.2x
2022-0713.2x₹80 cr6.1%4.0%0.2x
2022-0610.7x₹80 cr6.1%4.0%0.2x
2022-0514.6x₹70 cr5.2%5.0%0.1x
2022-0415.9x₹70 cr5.2%5.0%0.1x
2022-0314.6x₹70 cr5.2%5.0%0.1x
2022-0216.2x₹70 cr5.2%5.0%0.1x
2022-0121.4x₹70 cr5.2%5.0%0.1x
2021-1229.6x₹70 cr5.2%5.0%0.1x
2021-1113.1x₹70 cr5.2%5.0%0.1x
2021-1014.5x₹70 cr5.2%5.0%0.1x
2021-0915.1x₹70 cr5.2%5.0%0.1x
2021-0813.2x₹70 cr5.2%5.0%0.1x
2021-0715.8x₹70 cr5.2%5.0%0.1x
2021-0614.5x₹70 cr5.2%5.0%0.1x
2021-05—₹75 cr-7.7%-3.0%0.1x
2021-04—₹75 cr-7.7%-3.0%0.1x
2021-03—₹75 cr-7.7%-3.0%0.1x
2021-02—₹75 cr-7.7%-3.0%0.1x
2021-01—₹75 cr-7.7%-3.0%0.1x
2020-12—₹75 cr-7.7%-3.0%0.1x
2020-11—₹75 cr-7.7%-3.0%0.1x
2020-10—₹75 cr-7.7%-3.0%0.1x
2020-09—₹75 cr-7.7%-3.0%0.1x
2020-08—₹75 cr-7.7%-3.0%0.1x
2020-07—₹75 cr-7.7%-3.0%0.1x
2020-06—₹75 cr-7.7%-3.0%0.1x
2020-05—₹108 cr-0.8%1.0%0.1x
2020-04—₹108 cr-0.8%1.0%0.1x
2020-03—₹108 cr-0.8%1.0%0.1x
2020-02—₹108 cr-0.8%1.0%0.1x
2020-01—₹108 cr-0.8%1.0%0.1x
2019-12—₹108 cr-0.8%1.0%0.1x
2019-11—₹108 cr-0.8%1.0%0.1x
2019-10—₹108 cr-0.8%1.0%0.1x
2019-09—₹108 cr-0.8%1.0%0.1x
2019-08—₹108 cr-0.8%1.0%0.1x
2019-07—₹108 cr-0.8%1.0%0.1x
2019-06—₹108 cr-0.8%1.0%0.1x
2019-05—₹99 cr-1.1%0.0%0.0x
2019-04—₹99 cr-1.1%0.0%0.0x
2019-03—₹99 cr-1.1%0.0%0.0x
2019-02—₹99 cr-1.1%0.0%0.0x
2019-01—₹99 cr-1.1%0.0%0.0x

Methodology and data notes

Methodology

Methodology and data notes

All figures come from public exchange prices and screener.in financial statements. Quarterly and annual results are shown from 60 days after the period end, so a month never uses a result before it would plausibly have been published. Statements are the latest versions, which may include later restatements.

Sector medians, percentiles and indices use today's listed companies in the sector (survivorship bias). Prices are adjusted for splits and bonus issues; around a corporate action the fundamentals may lag the price by up to a month, and affected sections are hidden.

The return decomposition uses price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count. The reverse DCF uses a fixed 12% cost of equity, a 10-year horizon and a 15x terminal P/E, and is an illustration only. Events, flags and twins follow fixed rules and thresholds described next to each section.

Feedback