अApnaFunda

VOLER CAR LIMITED (VOLERCAR)

Miscellaneous · figures to Nov '26

Passes these screensHigh MomentumNear 52-week high

Share price

Closing priceAdjusted for splits and bonus issues.

₹302 latest close · +28.8% over the last 90 sessions

₹250₹300Jun 11Jul 8Aug 4Sep 3Sep 30Nov 2 ₹250₹300Jun 11Aug 19Nov 2

₹302 month-end · +47.3% over 12 months

₹200₹250₹300Nov '25Jan '26Apr '26Jun '26Sep '26Nov '26 ₹200₹250₹300Nov '25May '26Nov '26

₹302 month-end · +252.6% since Feb '25

₹100₹200₹300Feb '25Jun '25Oct '25Mar '26Jul '26Nov '26 ₹100₹200₹300Feb '25Jan '26Nov '26

52-week range ₹189.00 to ₹310.00 · 1-year volatility 57.6%

Was the rally earned?

+47%share price, 1 yearMultiple-driven

Partly.

  • Most of the rise came from investors paying a higher multiple (P/E 40.4x to 102.0x); per-share earnings took off 66 points.
  • The share count barely moved.
Net profit growth: −66 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).−66 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: +113 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+113 ptsP/E changeShare price: +47%+47%Share priceNet profit growth: −66 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).−66ProfitP/E change: +113 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+113P/EShare price: +47%+47%Share price
Net profit growth-66 ptsNet profit fell about 42%, which lowers the price.
P/E change+113 ptsThe P/E rose from 40.4x to 102.0x, which lifts the price.
Share count change0 ptsShare count was little changed. More shares would count against the price.
What do "pts" mean?

"pts" are percentage points of the share price return. The parts add up to the total shown for each period. Because price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count, higher profit pushes the price up, a higher P/E pushes it up, and more shares push it down.

Example: if the price rose 34% and profit growth accounts for +58 pts while a lower P/E accounts for -24 pts, then 58 - 24 = 34. The +58 is not the profit growth rate itself: it is the part of the price move that profit growth explains.

Not shown for 3 years and 5 years: earnings were negative at one end, or there is not enough history.

Net profit is trailing twelve months as reported with a 60-day lag.

Compare with other companies

How rough has the ride been?

Maximum drawdown-26.3%recovered 2025-07
1-year volatility57.6%annualised

Drawdown from peak

0%−10%−20%2026−26.3% 0%−10%−20%2026−26.3%
Largest drawdowns

-26.3% (2025-04 peak to 2025-06 low, recovered 2025-07)

-22.7% (2025-10 peak to 2025-12 low, recovered 2026-03)

-22.4% (2026-04 peak to 2026-09 low, recovered 2026-10)

What is the price implying?

~34%annual earnings growth implied by the price

At a P/E of 87.3x, the price would imply about 33.6%/yr earnings growth for 10 years under the same assumptions, but it is not ranked.

Below the ₹1,000 cr market-cap floor used for the lists.

“Implied growth” is what the current price would require under our stated assumptions, not what we expect.

The market-wide Expectations lists

Key figures

Share Priceclose 2 Nov
₹302.00
P/E
102.0x
ROCE
11.8%
Market Cap
₹336 cr
Revenue (TTM)
₹55 cr
P/S
6.1x
P/B
8.3x
ROE
8.1%
Operating Margin
6.0%
Debt / Equity
0.0x
Promoter Holding
67.9%
12M Momentum
47.3%

52-week range

₹189.00₹310.00
93% of the way from its 52-week low to its high

Price risk

1Y volatility
57.6%

Balance sheet & cash

Debt service
no meaningful debt
Cash from profit, 3Y
operating cash flow ÷ net profit
0.14x
low
Share count, 1Y
unchanged

Are profits backed by cash?

3 of 5checks within range2 beyond a threshold
Other income reliance61%Beyond threshold

Other income as a share of pre-tax profit (trailing twelve months): 61.2%. Bands: below 15%, 15% to 35%, above 35%.

Tax rate25%Within range

Median quarterly effective tax rate over about 2.5 years: 25.3%. Bands: 15% to 35%, 5% to 15% or 35% to 50%, outside 5% to 50%.

Cash conversion0.14xBeyond threshold

Operating cash flow divided by net profit over the last three fiscal years: 0.14x (cash from operations ₹2.3 cr, net profit ₹16.3 cr). Bands: 0.8x and above, 0.5x to 0.8x, below 0.5x.

Free cash flow4 of 5 yrsWithin range

Fiscal years with positive free cash flow in the last 5: 4. Bands: at least 80% of years, 40% to 80%, below 40%.

Receivable days vs history—Not enough data

Not enough reported data to compute this.

Capital work in progress0% of fixed assetsWithin range

Capital work-in-progress is 0% of fixed assets. Bands: not rising or up to 30%; rising for three years and above 30%; rising and above 60%.

Payable days—Not enough data

Not enough reported data to compute this.

Tap a check to see how it is measured

How to read this

Each check is a named rule with fixed thresholds, not a score. Annual statements are the latest restated figures, so a past year may differ from what was originally reported.

All terms explained in the glossary →

What happened next to similar setups

−8.4%typical 12-month return vs the marketNot meaningfully different from the base rate
  • We found 50 past situations where a non-financial company looked like VOLER CAR LIMITED today on valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, price momentum and size.
  • Over the following 12 months the middle half of them returned −32% to +33% vs the market, against −3% for all non-financial companies in the same months.
  • The gap against the base rate (−5.6%, 80% range −16.3% to +5.8%) is within what chance and overlapping periods produce.

Where the 50 outcomes landed

−100%−50%0%+50%+100%
FROG · Jan 2025: −66.2% vs market
JYOTISTRUC · Oct 2024: −60.9% vs market
NIITLTD · Nov 2024: −58.5% vs market
PILITA · May 2025: −57.4% vs market
QUICKHEAL · Aug 2024: −55.7% vs market
URJA · Dec 2021: −53.8% vs market
TOUCHWOOD · Oct 2023: −46.1% vs market
AAATECH · Apr 2024: −43.0% vs market
SASKEN · Jan 2025: −42.0% vs market
AUTOAXLES · Jan 2023: −42.0% vs market
INGERRAND · Mar 2020: −38.5% vs market
KIRLPNU · Oct 2024: −34.4% vs market
VSTTILLERS · Oct 2025: −32.1% vs market
DBSTOCKBRO · Dec 2021: −30.8% vs market
COMPUSOFT · Dec 2021: −30.7% vs market
KSB · Jan 2020: −28.4% vs market
HONDAPOWER · Nov 2022: −21.2% vs market
DENTALKART · Nov 2024: −20.8% vs market
GLOBAL · Aug 2022: −20.6% vs market
IXIGO · Jul 2025: −19.8% vs market
SILVERTUC · Nov 2023: −18.7% vs market
NAZARA · May 2025: −16.1% vs market
APCOTEXIND · Apr 2022: −13.9% vs market
SREEL · Sep 2022: −11.7% vs market
SIRCA · Nov 2022: −8.5% vs market
SNOWMAN · Feb 2020: −8.4% vs market
SUNDROP · Jan 2020: −2.3% vs market
BSE · Nov 2021: +1.6% vs market
LOTUSEYE · Jun 2020: +2.7% vs market
ALPA · Sep 2020: +3.8% vs market
ARVSMART · Dec 2022: +4.7% vs market
LMW · Jul 2021: +12.6% vs market
RIIL · Jun 2020: +16.7% vs market
PRIMESECU · May 2024: +17.2% vs market
RATEGAIN · Jun 2023: +21.9% vs market
WENDT · May 2022: +22.4% vs market
ANTELOPUS · Aug 2022: +29.8% vs market
ALLETEC · Jan 2024: +33.5% vs market
MAANALU · Feb 2021: +42.7% vs market
FCL · Dec 2020: +54.4% vs market
SHANTIGEAR · May 2022: +56.1% vs market
PRAJIND · Mar 2021: +65.5% vs market
PARAS · May 2024: +66.6% vs market
SCHNEIDER · Sep 2022: +70.0% vs market
VOLTAMP · May 2023: +87.7% vs market
VESUVIUS · Nov 2022: +89.7% vs market
OLECTRA · Jul 2021: +95.7% vs market
MCX · Oct 2023: +100.7% vs market
DENORA · May 2022: +104.5% vs market
ADFFOODS · May 2020: +109.5% vs market
Similar setups −8.4%All companies −2.8%← worse than the marketbetter than the market →

Each dot is one past situation (hover or tap for details) · Solid dots are the closest matches, listed below · Shaded is the middle half of all companies in the same months · 3 beyond the range shown, drawn at the edge

Similar setups' median
−8.4%
All companies' median
−2.8%
Beat the market
46% vs 47%

50 past situations · 50 companies · 33 months · 2020–2025

The closest matches

CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
WENDT
Producer Manufacturing
May 2022 108x11% +102%0% +22%
DENORA
Electronic Technology
May 2022 69x12% +107%−10% +105%
TOUCHWOOD
Consumer Services
Oct 2023 84x15% +87%−2% −46%
QUICKHEAL
Technology Services
Aug 2024 156x6% +221%0% −56%
SHANTIGEAR
Producer Manufacturing
May 2022 97x11% +66%0% +56%
Show the other 3 matches
CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
SIRCA
Process Industries
Nov 2022 69x18% +41%−1% −9%
INGERRAND
Producer Manufacturing
Mar 2020 24x17% −1%−10% −39%
LOTUSEYE
Health Services
Jun 2020 62x5% +42%−7% +3%
How reliable is this?

Matched on P/E, P/S, ROCE, operating margin, debt/equity, revenue growth, 12-month momentum, drawdown from 12-month high and size. Closest on: 12-month momentum, P/S and ROCE. Not used (unavailable for this company): interest cover and volatility. One match per company and at most 7 from any one month.

Independent periods: the matches fall in 6 distinct 12-month windows. Matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, so fewer windows means less evidence.

How this is built

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to VOLER CAR LIMITED. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

Methodology

How historical analogs are built

Data as of 2026-11-09. Outcome pool: Jan 2020 to Oct 2025.

For every company we look at the situation it is in today (valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, 12-month price momentum, drawdown, size and volatility) and find past company-months that looked most like it. We then show what happened to those past situations over the following 12 months, measured against the ApnaFunda All index and against the base rate. It describes history. It does not predict anything.

What is compared

FeatureWeightNon-financialFinancial
P/E1yesyes
P/S1yes—
P/B1—yes
ROCE1yes—
operating margin1yes—
ROE1—yes
debt/equity0.75yes—
interest cover0.5yes—
revenue growth0.75yesyes
12-month momentum1yesyes
drawdown from 12-month high0.75yesyes
size0.75yesyes
volatility0.5yesyes

Weights were set by judgement before any outcome was looked at and are never tuned on results. Loss-making companies (negative P/E or net profit) are only matched with other loss-making companies. Banks, NBFCs and insurers are compared only with each other and use a different feature set. Every feature is converted, month by month, to its rank among companies in the same pool in that month, so a P/E of 30 in a hot market and a P/E of 22 in a cold one can match if both were equally expensive for their time. Only that month's data is used.

How closeness and the sample are defined

Distance is the weighted root-mean-square gap between the standardised features both companies have. A match needs at least 70% of the query's feature weight, a distance of at most 0.9, and 30 matches at minimum to be shown. We keep up to 50 matches with these exclusions: never the company itself, one match per company (its closest month), and at most 7 from any one calendar month so a single market episode cannot dominate.

Base rate

The base rate is the distribution of 12-month returns, relative to the market, of every eligible company-month in the same pool, with each month weighted to match the months the analogs came from. It answers: how did a random company do in these same months? Because matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, we also report the number of distinct 12-month windows behind a result, and a bootstrap that resamples months decides whether the analog median differs from the base rate at all. "Not meaningfully different" is the usual outcome and the page copy is written for it.

Limits you should know

  • One market period. The outcome pool covers 2020–2025 only (70 months), including the 2020 crash and the 2020–21 rally.
  • Survivorship. Only companies listed today are included. Delisted and bankrupt companies are missing, which flatters past outcomes, particularly for distressed-looking setups.
  • Price return only. Dividends are excluded, and the benchmark is an ApnaFunda market-cap-weighted index of the same listed companies, not an official index.
  • Reporting lag. Fundamentals are matched on an assumed 60-day lag after the quarter end, not on real announcement dates.
  • Pools: non-financial: 98,395 company-months from 2019 companies; financial: 5,659 company-months from 108 companies. 2349 companies currently have a result; the rest are suppressed because too few comparable situations exist.

Does it work? A walk-forward check

The walk-forward check has not been run for this build, so skill is shown as not yet measured.

Disclaimer

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to any company shown. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

What changed?

5 events since Jun '25

  1. FebDebtDebt / equity halved over 12 months to 0.00x.
  2. FebSharesShare count is up 200.0% over 12 months.
  3. DecInstitutionsFII + DII holding fell 7.3 pts over 1 quarter to 0.8%.
  4. JulPriceRegained the 2025-04 peak, 1 month after the low.
  5. JunPriceFell 26% from the Apr 2025 peak to the Jun 2025 low.

Events are generated from the data by fixed rules.
The month shown is when the change became visible in the reported figures, assuming a 60-day lag after each quarter end; it is not an announcement date.

Where price and fundamentals disagree, market-wide Rewind the whole market to any month

Monthly history22 months · 2025-02 to 2026-11
MonthP/ERevenue (TTM)ROEROCEDebt / Equity
2026-11102.0x₹55 cr8.1%11.8%0.0x
2026-10102.0x₹55 cr8.1%11.8%0.0x
2026-0973.7x₹55 cr8.1%11.8%0.0x
2026-0871.5x₹53 cr8.5%11.8%0.0x
2026-0769.5x₹53 cr8.5%11.8%0.0x
2026-0674.8x₹53 cr8.5%11.8%0.0x
2026-0571.2x₹50 cr9.9%25.4%0.0x
2026-0478.4x₹50 cr9.9%25.4%0.0x
2026-0362.9x₹50 cr9.9%25.4%0.0x
2026-0255.8x₹47 cr11.1%25.4%0.0x
2026-0165.2x₹47 cr11.1%25.4%0.0x
2025-1257.2x₹47 cr11.1%25.4%0.0x
2025-1140.4x₹45 cr15.2%25.4%0.0x
2025-1048.2x₹45 cr15.2%25.4%0.0x
2025-0946.7x₹45 cr15.2%25.4%0.0x
2025-0839.2x₹42 cr15.8%25.4%0.0x
2025-0729.7x₹42 cr15.8%25.4%0.0x
2025-0616.4x₹42 cr15.8%25.4%0.0x
2025-058.4x₹31 cr420.6%152.7%0.4x
2025-049.7x₹31 cr420.6%152.7%0.4x
2025-037.6x₹31 cr420.6%152.7%0.4x
2025-027.8x₹31 cr420.6%152.7%0.4x

Methodology and data notes

Methodology

Methodology and data notes

All figures come from public exchange prices and screener.in financial statements. Quarterly and annual results are shown from 60 days after the period end, so a month never uses a result before it would plausibly have been published. Statements are the latest versions, which may include later restatements.

Sector medians, percentiles and indices use today's listed companies in the sector (survivorship bias). Prices are adjusted for splits and bonus issues; around a corporate action the fundamentals may lag the price by up to a month, and affected sections are hidden.

The return decomposition uses price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count. The reverse DCF uses a fixed 12% cost of equity, a 10-year horizon and a 15x terminal P/E, and is an illustration only. Events, flags and twins follow fixed rules and thresholds described next to each section.

Feedback