अApnaFunda
Menu

AMJ LAND HOLDINGS LIMITED (AMJLAND)

Finance · Real Estate Development · figures to Nov '26

Quality scoreHow the business itself ranks against its sector peers on profitability, 3-year growth and leverage. 50 is the middle of the sector.68 / 100
Profitability 45Growth 59Balance sheet 100
Compare withDLFLODHA DEVELOPERSPHOENIX MILLS

Share price

Closing priceAdjusted for splits and bonus issues.

₹35.49 latest close · −8.0% over the last 90 sessions

₹34₹36₹38₹40Jul 3Jul 29Aug 24Sep 17Oct 14Nov 9 ₹34₹36₹38₹40Jul 3Sep 4Nov 9

₹35.49 month-end · −33.4% over 12 months

₹30₹40₹50Nov '25Jan '26Apr '26Jun '26Sep '26Nov '26 ₹30₹40₹50Nov '25May '26Nov '26

₹35.49 month-end · −7.8% over 3 years

₹40₹60Nov '23Jun '24Jan '25Sep '25Apr '26Nov '26 ₹40₹60Nov '23May '25Nov '26

₹35.49 month-end · +77.0% since Jan '19

₹20₹40₹60Jan '19Aug '20Mar '22Sep '23Apr '25Nov '26 ₹20₹40₹60Jan '19Dec '22Nov '26

52-week range ₹30.30 to ₹56.24 · 1-year volatility 38.4%

Was the rally earned?

-33%share price, 1 yearEarnings-driven

Mostly earnings.

  • Per-share earnings took off 26 points, while the multiple moved less (P/E 10.9x to 10.0x).
  • The share count barely moved.
Net profit growth: −26 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).−26 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: −8 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−8 ptsP/E changeShare count change: +1 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.+1 ptsShare count changeShare price: −33%−33%Share priceNet profit growth: −26 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).−26ProfitP/E change: −8 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−8P/EShare count change: +1 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.+1SharesShare price: −33%−33%Share price
Net profit growth-26 ptsNet profit fell about 27%, which lowers the price.
P/E change-8 ptsThe P/E fell from 10.9x to 10.0x, which lowers the price.
Share count change+1 ptsShare count was little changed. More shares would count against the price.
-8%share price, 3 yearsLower P/E held it back

Earnings helped, the multiple did not.

  • Per-share earnings added 73 points, but investors now pay less per rupee of profit (P/E 23.2x to 10.0x), which took 81 points back.
  • The share count barely moved.
Net profit growth: +74 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+74 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: −81 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−81 ptsP/E changeShare count change: −1 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−1 ptsShare count changeShare price: −8%−8%Share priceNet profit growth: +74 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+74ProfitP/E change: −81 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−81P/EShare count change: −1 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−1SharesShare price: −8%−8%Share price
Net profit growth+74 ptsNet profit rose about 117%, which lifts the price.
P/E change-81 ptsThe P/E fell from 23.2x to 10.0x, which lowers the price.
Share count change-1 ptsShare count was little changed. More shares would count against the price.
+15%share price, 5 yearsLower P/E held it back

Mostly yes, with a catch.

  • Per-share earnings added 128 points, but investors now pay less per rupee of profit (P/E 28.5x to 10.0x), which took 113 points back.
  • The share count barely moved.
Net profit growth: +128 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+128 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: −113 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−113 ptsP/E changeShare price: +15%+15%Share priceNet profit growth: +128 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+128ProfitP/E change: −113 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−113P/EShare price: +15%+15%Share price
Net profit growth+128 ptsNet profit rose about 230%, which lifts the price.
P/E change-113 ptsThe P/E fell from 28.5x to 10.0x, which lowers the price.
Share count change0 ptsShare count was little changed. More shares would count against the price.
What do "pts" mean?

"pts" are percentage points of the share price return. The parts add up to the total shown for each period. Because price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count, higher profit pushes the price up, a higher P/E pushes it up, and more shares push it down.

Example: if the price rose 34% and profit growth accounts for +58 pts while a lower P/E accounts for -24 pts, then 58 - 24 = 34. The +58 is not the profit growth rate itself: it is the part of the price move that profit growth explains.

Net profit is trailing twelve months as reported with a 60-day lag.

Compare this with DLF

How rough has the ride been?

Maximum drawdown-56.5%not yet recovered
1-year volatility38.4%annualised

Drawdown from peak

0%−20%−40%2020202120222023202420252026−52.9% 0%−20%−40%2020202220242026−52.9%
Largest drawdowns

-56.5% (2024-12 peak to 2026-03 low, not yet recovered)

-52.5% (2021-09 peak to 2023-03 low, recovered 2023-11)

-45.4% (2019-01 peak to 2020-03 low, recovered 2020-12)

Is it expensive against its own past and its peers?

10.0xP/E todayNear its historic low
Against its own history16th percentile
CheapestMedian 15.3xDearest

Usual range 9.0x to 26.5x since 2019-01.

Against Finance10.0x vs 18.1x
This company
10.0x
Sector median
18.1x

45% below the Finance median.

6.5x16.0x25.5x35.0xJan '19Aug '20Mar '22Oct '23May '25Nov '266.5x16.0x25.5x35.0xJan '19Sep '21May '24Nov '26
P/E (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianFinance median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/B (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianFinance median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/S (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianFinance median
How to read this

Shaded band: 10th to 90th percentile of the company's own P/E history; dotted line: its median; orange line: sector median (companies with a positive multiple, at least 5 in the sector).

Sector figures are built from today's listed companies, so they exclude companies that are no longer listed.

All terms explained in the glossary →

How Finance is valued

Where does it rank among Finance peers?

Each cell is the company's percentile rank among its Finance peers (non-financial companies) that month.
Darker is better-ranked.
Rows marked ↓ are inverted (lower debt, shorter cash cycle and a lower P/E rank higher).

Where it ranks today

  • ROCE48th▼ 16 pts vs a year ago
  • Op. margin41st▼ 6 pts vs a year ago
  • Revenue growth11th▼ 18 pts vs a year ago
  • EPS growth25th▼ 61 pts vs a year ago
  • Debt/equity ↓90thflat vs a year ago
  • Cash cycle ↓72nd▲ 60 pts vs a year ago
  • P/E ↓80th▼ 5 pts vs a year ago
  • 12M momentum21st▼ 23 pts vs a year ago

Rank history

ROCE
Op. margin
Revenue growth
EPS growth
Debt/equity ↓
Cash cycle ↓
P/E ↓
12M momentum
Dec '21Jul '22Jan '23Jul '23Jan '24Jul '24Jan '25Jul '25Jan '26Jul '26Nov '26
Lower rank Higher rank Not enough data

Percentiles use today's listed companies in the sector and need at least 5 peers with a value; grey cells have too few.
ROE is computed from net profit and book value where the source does not report it.

The Finance sector page Watch it move against Finance in the Observatory

What is the price implying?

~9%annual earnings growth implied by the price

At a P/E of 11.8x, the price would imply about 8.7%/yr earnings growth for 10 years under the same assumptions, but it is not ranked.

Below the ₹1,000 cr market-cap floor used for the lists.

“Implied growth” is what the current price would require under our stated assumptions, not what we expect.

What prices imply across Finance The market-wide Expectations lists

Key figures

Share Priceclose 9 Nov
₹35.49
P/E
10.0x
ROCE
8.0%
Market Cap
₹145 cr
Revenue (TTM)
₹53 cr
P/S
2.8x
P/B
0.7x
ROE
6.8%
Operating Margin
21.3%
Debt / Equity
0.0x
Promoter Holding
65.9%
12M Momentum
-33.4%

52-week range

₹30.30₹56.24
20% of the way from its 52-week low to its high

Price risk

1Y volatility
38.4%
Beta vs sector
1-year daily
0.97

Balance sheet & cash

Debt service
no meaningful debt
Cash from profit, 3Y
operating cash flow ÷ net profit
1.46x
Share count, 1Y
unchanged

Are profits backed by cash?

5 of 6checks within range1 beyond a threshold
Other income reliance47%Beyond threshold

Other income as a share of pre-tax profit (trailing twelve months): 46.9%. Bands: below 15%, 15% to 35%, above 35%.

Tax rate33%Within range

Median quarterly effective tax rate over about 2.5 years: 32.9%. Bands: 15% to 35%, 5% to 15% or 35% to 50%, outside 5% to 50%.

Cash conversion1.46xWithin range

Operating cash flow divided by net profit over the last three fiscal years: 1.46x (cash from operations ₹70 cr, net profit ₹48 cr). Bands: 0.8x and above, 0.5x to 0.8x, below 0.5x.

Free cash flow4 of 5 yrsWithin range

Fiscal years with positive free cash flow in the last 5: 4. Bands: at least 80% of years, 40% to 80%, below 40%.

Receivable days vs history-6 daysWithin range

Debtor days are below the median of the previous three fiscal years by 6 days (7 vs 13). Bands: under 15 days, 15 to 45, over 45.

Capital work in progress0% of fixed assetsWithin range

Capital work-in-progress is 0% of fixed assets. Bands: not rising or up to 30%; rising for three years and above 30%; rising and above 60%.

Payable days—Not enough data

Not enough reported data to compute this.

Tap a check to see how it is measured

How to read this

Each check is a named rule with fixed thresholds, not a score. Annual statements are the latest restated figures, so a past year may differ from what was originally reported.

All terms explained in the glossary →

Who has been buying and selling?

  • Over 3 years, institutional and promoter holdings were broadly unchanged.
  • The number of shareholders rose from 11,409 to 14,674 (+29%) between Sep 2023 and Jun 2026.

Holdings, Jun '26

How each group changed

GroupSep '23Jun '26Change
Promoters65.9%65.9%0.0 pts
FIIs0.0%0.0%0.0 pts
DIIs0.0%0.1%+0.1 pts
Public and others34.1%34.0%-0.1 pts

Number of shareholders

14,674shareholders+29% since Sep '23
11k13k14k15k Sep '23Jun '24Dec '24Jun '25Dec '25Jun '26
Sep '23: 11,409
Mar '24: 12,125
Jun '24: 11,785
Sep '24: 13,218
Dec '24: 14,619
Mar '25: 14,091
Jun '25: 15,193
Sep '25: 15,041
Dec '25: 15,401
Mar '26: 14,970
Jun '26: 14,674
 11k13k14k15k Sep '23Dec '24Dec '25Jun '26
Sep '23: 11,409
Mar '24: 12,125
Jun '24: 11,785
Sep '24: 13,218
Dec '24: 14,619
Mar '25: 14,091
Jun '25: 15,193
Sep '25: 15,041
Dec '25: 15,401
Mar '26: 14,970
Jun '26: 14,674

Quarterly shareholding as reported, labelled by the quarter it covers (it becomes visible about two months later).
Shareholder counts are only available for recent quarters.

This quarter's smart-money board

What happened next to similar setups

+4.0%typical 12-month return vs the marketAbove the base rate
  • We found 50 past situations where a non-financial company looked like AMJ LAND HOLDINGS LIMITED today on valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, price momentum, size and volatility.
  • Over the following 12 months the middle half of them returned −8% to +33% vs the market, against −3% for all non-financial companies in the same months.
  • The analogs' median sat above that base rate (gap +6.6%, 80% range +1.1% to +12.9%), but the matches cluster in only 5 distinct 12-month windows.

Where the 50 outcomes landed

−50%0%+50%+100%
GSS · May 2023: −63.1% vs market
HMVL · Jan 2020: −39.1% vs market
AIRAN · Oct 2025: −37.3% vs market
TRF · Aug 2025: −32.2% vs market
TREL · Jul 2025: −30.5% vs market
INDBANK · Sep 2025: −23.4% vs market
EXCELINDUS · Jun 2023: −18.8% vs market
HINDCOMPOS · Sep 2025: −16.5% vs market
EIMCOELECO · Apr 2021: −15.4% vs market
SANDESH · Jun 2025: −14.5% vs market
VARDHACRLC · Jun 2024: −13.8% vs market
UNITEDTEA · Jan 2023: −9.4% vs market
MANALIPETC · Feb 2024: −7.7% vs market
PONNIERODE · Jun 2025: −7.3% vs market
SRHHYPOLTD · Oct 2025: −7.1% vs market
MUNJALSHOW · Jun 2020: −5.5% vs market
ANTELOPUS · Jun 2020: −4.8% vs market
IPL · Mar 2025: −3.7% vs market
MAZDA · Jun 2025: −2.7% vs market
GANGESSECU · May 2023: −1.8% vs market
FIBERWEB · Jun 2023: −1.2% vs market
GEECEE · Feb 2020: +0.7% vs market
DELTACORP · Sep 2025: +2.6% vs market
ALPHAGEO · Nov 2023: +2.9% vs market
DEN · Aug 2022: +3.6% vs market
DBSTOCKBRO · Jun 2025: +4.5% vs market
ALBERTDAVD · Jun 2021: +6.2% vs market
GMDCLTD · Oct 2020: +7.9% vs market
PODDARMENT · Sep 2022: +11.4% vs market
SEMAC · Feb 2021: +12.4% vs market
SREEL · Jan 2022: +13.1% vs market
IVC · Aug 2025: +13.8% vs market
SILINV · Dec 2021: +15.2% vs market
ALPA · May 2024: +16.2% vs market
VLSFINANCE · Jun 2023: +26.6% vs market
KITEX · Jul 2021: +31.2% vs market
GANDHITUBE · Oct 2020: +31.8% vs market
STEELCITY · Dec 2020: +32.9% vs market
XCHANGING · Apr 2023: +36.0% vs market
BANARBEADS · May 2024: +36.9% vs market
SESHAPAPER · Sep 2021: +47.7% vs market
INDOBORAX · Dec 2024: +49.7% vs market
CUPID · Aug 2022: +51.6% vs market
OSWALGREEN · Dec 2023: +54.5% vs market
TREJHARA · Jan 2023: +78.1% vs market
KIRIINDUS · Mar 2024: +98.5% vs market
QUICKHEAL · Apr 2023: +143.5% vs market
KABRAEXTRU · May 2020: +147.5% vs market
ANUP · Oct 2022: +165.5% vs market
NUCLEUS · Nov 2022: +232.5% vs market
Similar setups +4.0%All companies −2.6%← worse than the marketbetter than the market →

Each dot is one past situation (hover or tap for details) · Solid dots are the closest matches, listed below · Shaded is the middle half of all companies in the same months · 5 beyond the range shown, drawn at the edge

Similar setups' median
+4.0%
All companies' median
−2.6%
Beat the market
58% vs 47%

50 past situations · 50 companies · 34 months · 2020–2025

The closest matches

CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
GEECEE
Finance		 Feb 2020 4x9% −37%−47% +1%
UNITEDTEA
Consumer Non-Durables		 Jan 2023 11x14% −25%−35% −9%
SANDESH
Consumer Services		 Jun 2025 11x8% −25%−41% −15%
IVC
Finance		 Aug 2025 17x7% −37%−38% +14%
XCHANGING
Technology Services		 Apr 2023 12x10% −28%−31% +36%
Show the other 3 matches
CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
CUPID
Consumer Non-Durables		 Aug 2022 10x— −2%−36% +52%
ALPHAGEO
Industrial Services		 Nov 2023 13x0% −3%−13% +3%
OSWALGREEN
Finance		 Dec 2023 16x3% −2%−12% +55%
How reliable is this?

Matched on P/E, P/S, ROCE, operating margin, debt/equity, revenue growth, 12-month momentum, drawdown from 12-month high, size and volatility. Closest on: drawdown from 12-month high, 12-month momentum and volatility. Not used (unavailable for this company): interest cover. One match per company and at most 7 from any one month.

Independent periods: the matches fall in 5 distinct 12-month windows. Matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, so fewer windows means less evidence.

How this is built

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to AMJ LAND HOLDINGS LIMITED. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

Methodology

How historical analogs are built

Data as of 2026-11-09. Outcome pool: Jan 2020 to Oct 2025.

For every company we look at the situation it is in today (valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, 12-month price momentum, drawdown, size and volatility) and find past company-months that looked most like it. We then show what happened to those past situations over the following 12 months, measured against the ApnaFunda All index and against the base rate. It describes history. It does not predict anything.

What is compared

FeatureWeightNon-financialFinancial
P/E1yesyes
P/S1yes—
P/B1—yes
ROCE1yes—
operating margin1yes—
ROE1—yes
debt/equity0.75yes—
interest cover0.5yes—
revenue growth0.75yesyes
12-month momentum1yesyes
drawdown from 12-month high0.75yesyes
size0.75yesyes
volatility0.5yesyes

Weights were set by judgement before any outcome was looked at and are never tuned on results. Loss-making companies (negative P/E or net profit) are only matched with other loss-making companies. Banks, NBFCs and insurers are compared only with each other and use a different feature set. Every feature is converted, month by month, to its rank among companies in the same pool in that month, so a P/E of 30 in a hot market and a P/E of 22 in a cold one can match if both were equally expensive for their time. Only that month's data is used.

How closeness and the sample are defined

Distance is the weighted root-mean-square gap between the standardised features both companies have. A match needs at least 70% of the query's feature weight, a distance of at most 0.9, and 30 matches at minimum to be shown. We keep up to 50 matches with these exclusions: never the company itself, one match per company (its closest month), and at most 7 from any one calendar month so a single market episode cannot dominate.

Base rate

The base rate is the distribution of 12-month returns, relative to the market, of every eligible company-month in the same pool, with each month weighted to match the months the analogs came from. It answers: how did a random company do in these same months? Because matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, we also report the number of distinct 12-month windows behind a result, and a bootstrap that resamples months decides whether the analog median differs from the base rate at all. "Not meaningfully different" is the usual outcome and the page copy is written for it.

Limits you should know

  • One market period. The outcome pool covers 2020–2025 only (70 months), including the 2020 crash and the 2020–21 rally.
  • Survivorship. Only companies listed today are included. Delisted and bankrupt companies are missing, which flatters past outcomes, particularly for distressed-looking setups.
  • Price return only. Dividends are excluded, and the benchmark is an ApnaFunda market-cap-weighted index of the same listed companies, not an official index.
  • Reporting lag. Fundamentals are matched on an assumed 60-day lag after the quarter end, not on real announcement dates.
  • Pools: non-financial: 98,395 company-months from 2019 companies; financial: 5,659 company-months from 108 companies. 2349 companies currently have a result; the rest are suppressed because too few comparable situations exist.

Does it work? A walk-forward check

The walk-forward check has not been run for this build, so skill is shown as not yet measured.

Disclaimer

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to any company shown. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

What changed?

30 events since Jun '21

  1. SepPeer rankSlipped to the 3rd quartile of Finance on operating margin (from the 2nd quartile).
  2. JunResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned negative.
  3. JunPeer rankSlipped to the 3rd quartile of Finance on ROCE (from the 2nd quartile).
  4. MarPriceFell 56% from the Dec 2024 peak to the Mar 2026 low.
  5. MarPeer rankSlipped to the bottom quartile of Finance on operating margin (from the 3rd quartile).
  6. DecValuationP/E fell below the 10th percentile of its own history to date (10.2x).
  7. SepPeer rankSlipped to the 3rd quartile of Finance on operating margin (from the top quartile).
  8. JunResultsRevenue (TTM) reached a new high of ₹78 cr.
Show 22 earlier events
  1. JunPeer rankMoved into the 2nd quartile of Finance on ROCE (from the 3rd quartile).
  2. MarPeer rankSlipped to the 3rd quartile of Finance on operating margin (from the 2nd quartile).
  3. DecPeer rankMoved into the 2nd quartile of Finance on operating margin (from the 3rd quartile).
  4. NovPriceRegained the 2024-07 peak, 1 month after the low.
  5. OctPriceFell 28% from the Jul 2024 peak to the Oct 2024 low.
  6. SepPeer rankSlipped to the 2nd quartile of Finance on EPS growth (from the top quartile).
  7. JulPriceRegained the 2024-01 peak, 4 months after the low.
  8. JunResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned positive.
  9. JunPeer rankMoved into the top quartile of Finance on EPS growth (from the 3rd quartile).
  10. MarPriceFell 27% from the Jan 2024 peak to the Mar 2024 low.
  11. NovPriceRegained the 2021-09 peak, 8 months after the low.
  12. JunResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned negative.
  13. JunPeer rankSlipped to the 3rd quartile of Finance on ROCE (from the 2nd quartile).
  14. MarPriceFell 52% from the Sep 2021 peak to the Mar 2023 low.
  15. JunResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned positive.
  16. JunPeer rankMoved into the 2nd quartile of Finance on ROCE (from the 3rd quartile).
  17. JunDividendDividend payout cut from 19% to 9% of profit.
  18. SepPriceRegained the 2021-08 peak, 1 month after the low.
  19. AugPriceFell 28% from the Aug 2021 peak to the Aug 2021 low.
  20. JunResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned negative.
  21. JunValuationP/E crossed above the 90th percentile of its own history to date (29.0x).
  22. JunPeer rankSlipped to the 3rd quartile of Finance on ROCE (from the 2nd quartile).

Events are generated from the data by fixed rules.
The month shown is when the change became visible in the reported figures, assuming a 60-day lag after each quarter end; it is not an announcement date.

Where price and fundamentals disagree, market-wide Rewind the whole market to any month

Monthly history95 months · 2019-01 to 2026-11
MonthP/ERevenue (TTM)ROEROCEDebt / Equity
2026-1110.0x₹53 cr6.8%8.0%0.0x
2026-109.6x₹53 cr6.8%8.0%0.0x
2026-0910.6x₹53 cr6.8%8.0%0.0x
2026-0811.0x₹53 cr6.9%8.0%0.0x
2026-0710.9x₹53 cr6.9%8.0%0.0x
2026-0610.4x₹53 cr6.9%8.0%0.0x
2026-057.6x₹63 cr8.8%14.0%0.0x
2026-048.3x₹63 cr8.8%14.0%0.0x
2026-036.5x₹63 cr8.8%14.0%0.0x
2026-027.9x₹66 cr9.3%14.0%0.0x
2026-018.2x₹66 cr9.3%14.0%0.0x
2025-1210.2x₹66 cr9.3%14.0%0.0x
2025-1110.9x₹66 cr8.8%14.0%0.0x
2025-1011.2x₹66 cr8.8%14.0%0.0x
2025-0911.1x₹66 cr8.8%14.0%0.0x
2025-0811.4x₹78 cr9.1%14.0%0.0x
2025-0712.1x₹78 cr9.1%14.0%0.0x
2025-0613.2x₹78 cr9.1%14.0%0.0x
2025-0515.9x₹60 cr8.2%8.0%0.1x
2025-0414.0x₹60 cr8.2%8.0%0.1x
2025-0312.7x₹60 cr8.2%8.0%0.1x
2025-0215.7x₹66 cr7.3%8.0%0.1x
2025-0117.9x₹66 cr7.3%8.0%0.1x
2024-1221.0x₹66 cr7.3%8.0%0.1x
2024-1121.2x₹72 cr7.1%8.0%0.1x
2024-1016.6x₹72 cr7.1%8.0%0.1x
2024-0916.4x₹72 cr7.1%8.0%0.1x
2024-0820.4x₹56 cr6.4%8.0%0.1x
2024-0721.0x₹56 cr6.4%8.0%0.1x
2024-0615.5x₹56 cr6.4%8.0%0.1x
2024-0523.6x₹35 cr4.6%7.0%0.0x
2024-0422.7x₹35 cr4.6%7.0%0.0x
2024-0320.4x₹35 cr4.6%7.0%0.0x
2024-0222.8x₹35 cr4.6%7.0%0.0x
2024-0125.8x₹35 cr4.6%7.0%0.0x
2023-1224.5x₹35 cr4.6%7.0%0.0x
2023-1123.2x₹35 cr4.6%7.0%0.0x
2023-1018.4x₹35 cr4.6%7.0%0.0x
2023-0919.1x₹35 cr4.6%7.0%0.0x
2023-0818.2x₹35 cr4.6%7.0%0.0x
2023-0718.3x₹35 cr4.6%7.0%0.0x
2023-0615.2x₹35 cr4.6%7.0%0.0x
2023-0510.5x₹29 cr6.1%9.0%0.0x
2023-0410.9x₹29 cr6.1%9.0%0.0x
2023-039.8x₹29 cr6.1%9.0%0.0x
2023-0211.9x₹29 cr6.1%9.0%0.0x
2023-0112.9x₹29 cr6.1%9.0%0.0x
2022-1212.7x₹29 cr6.1%9.0%0.0x
2022-1112.9x₹29 cr6.1%9.0%0.0x
2022-1013.9x₹29 cr6.1%9.0%0.0x
2022-0912.8x₹29 cr6.1%9.0%0.0x
2022-0815.3x₹29 cr6.1%9.0%0.0x
2022-0711.9x₹29 cr6.1%9.0%0.0x
2022-0611.8x₹29 cr6.1%9.0%0.0x
2022-0525.6x₹11 cr3.9%5.0%0.1x
2022-0426.4x₹11 cr3.9%5.0%0.1x
2022-0328.6x₹11 cr3.9%5.0%0.1x
2022-0227.1x₹11 cr3.9%5.0%0.1x
2022-0130.3x₹11 cr3.9%5.0%0.1x
2021-1230.7x₹11 cr3.9%5.0%0.1x
2021-1128.5x₹11 cr3.9%5.0%0.1x
2021-1030.7x₹11 cr3.9%5.0%0.1x
2021-0935.0x₹11 cr3.9%5.0%0.1x
2021-0826.5x₹11 cr3.9%5.0%0.1x
2021-0733.5x₹11 cr3.9%5.0%0.1x
2021-0629.0x₹11 cr3.9%5.0%0.1x
2021-0511.4x₹17 cr9.4%7.0%0.1x
2021-0410.3x₹17 cr9.4%7.0%0.1x
2021-039.2x₹17 cr9.4%7.0%0.1x
2021-0210.6x₹17 cr9.4%7.0%0.1x
2021-0110.4x₹17 cr9.4%7.0%0.1x
2020-1210.7x₹17 cr9.4%7.0%0.1x
2020-119.1x₹17 cr9.4%7.0%0.1x
2020-108.9x₹17 cr9.4%7.0%0.1x
2020-098.0x₹17 cr9.4%7.0%0.1x
2020-087.5x₹17 cr9.4%7.0%0.1x
2020-077.1x₹17 cr9.4%7.0%0.1x
2020-068.2x₹17 cr9.4%7.0%0.1x
2020-0514.0x₹21 cr4.3%6.0%0.0x
2020-0414.3x₹21 cr4.3%6.0%0.0x
2020-0313.6x₹21 cr4.3%6.0%0.0x
2020-0218.2x₹21 cr4.3%6.0%0.0x
2020-0120.7x₹21 cr4.3%6.0%0.0x
2019-1218.1x₹21 cr4.3%6.0%0.0x
2019-1118.0x₹21 cr4.3%6.0%0.0x
2019-1017.4x₹21 cr4.3%6.0%0.0x
2019-0916.6x₹21 cr4.3%6.0%0.0x
2019-0815.6x₹21 cr4.3%6.0%0.0x
2019-0715.7x₹21 cr4.3%6.0%0.0x
2019-0615.6x₹21 cr4.3%6.0%0.0x
2019-0523.8x₹27 cr3.3%4.0%0.1x
2019-0424.4x₹27 cr3.3%4.0%0.1x
2019-0324.3x₹27 cr3.3%4.0%0.1x
2019-0224.3x₹27 cr3.3%4.0%0.1x
2019-0124.8x₹27 cr3.3%4.0%0.1x

Methodology and data notes

Methodology

Methodology and data notes

All figures come from public exchange prices and screener.in financial statements. Quarterly and annual results are shown from 60 days after the period end, so a month never uses a result before it would plausibly have been published. Statements are the latest versions, which may include later restatements.

Sector medians, percentiles and indices use today's listed companies in the sector (survivorship bias). Prices are adjusted for splits and bonus issues; around a corporate action the fundamentals may lag the price by up to a month, and affected sections are hidden.

The return decomposition uses price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count. The reverse DCF uses a fixed 12% cost of equity, a 10-year horizon and a 15x terminal P/E, and is an illustration only. Events, flags and twins follow fixed rules and thresholds described next to each section.

Feedback