अApnaFunda

GEECEE VENTURES LIMITED (GEECEE)

Finance · Real Estate Development · figures to Nov '26

Quality scoreHow the business itself ranks against its sector peers on profitability, 3-year growth and leverage. 50 is the middle of the sector.77 / 100
Profitability 44Growth 86Balance sheet 100
Momentum scoreHow strong the recent trend is: 3-month price change, 12-month improvement in earnings and the rise in FII + DII holding, among companies above ₹500 cr.44 / 100
Price 50Earnings 30FII/DII 53

Share price

Closing priceAdjusted for splits and bonus issues.

₹348.55 latest close · −1.9% over the last 90 sessions

₹340₹360₹380Jul 3Jul 29Aug 24Sep 17Oct 14Nov 9 ₹340₹360₹380Jul 3Sep 4Nov 9

₹348.55 month-end · −4.1% over 12 months

₹250₹300₹350Nov '25Jan '26Apr '26Jun '26Sep '26Nov '26 ₹250₹300₹350Nov '25May '26Nov '26

₹348.55 month-end · +67.9% over 3 years

₹200₹300₹400Nov '23Jun '24Jan '25Sep '25Apr '26Nov '26 ₹200₹300₹400Nov '23May '25Nov '26

₹348.55 month-end · +223.6% since Jan '19

₹200₹400Jan '19Aug '20Mar '22Sep '23Apr '25Nov '26 ₹200₹400Jan '19Dec '22Nov '26

52-week range ₹215.85 to ₹390.00 · 1-year volatility 38.4%

Was the rally earned?

-4%share price, 1 yearRoughly flat
  • The share price was roughly flat over 1 year (-4%).
  • The share count barely moved.
Net profit growth: +16 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+16 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: −20 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−20 ptsP/E changeShare price: −4%−4%Share priceNet profit growth: +16 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+16ProfitP/E change: −20 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−20P/EShare price: −4%−4%Share price
Net profit growth+16 ptsNet profit rose about 18%, which lifts the price.
P/E change-20 ptsThe P/E fell from 19.4x to 15.7x, which lowers the price.
Share count change0 ptsShare count was little changed. More shares would count against the price.
+68%share price, 3 yearsLower P/E held it back

Mostly yes, with a catch.

  • Per-share earnings added 181 points, but investors now pay less per rupee of profit (P/E 37.3x to 15.7x), which took 113 points back.
  • The share count fell 3%.
Net profit growth: +177 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+177 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: −113 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−113 ptsP/E changeShare count change: +4 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.+4 ptsShare count changeShare price: +68%+68%Share priceNet profit growth: +177 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+177ProfitP/E change: −113 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−113P/EShare count change: +4 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.+4SharesShare price: +68%+68%Share price
Net profit growth+177 ptsNet profit rose about 286%, which lifts the price.
P/E change-113 ptsThe P/E fell from 37.3x to 15.7x, which lowers the price.
Share count change+4 ptsShare count fell 3%, which lifts the price.
+152%share price, 5 yearsLower P/E held it back

Mostly yes, with a catch.

  • Per-share earnings added 248 points, but investors now pay less per rupee of profit (P/E 28.2x to 15.7x), which took 96 points back.
  • The share count rose 3%.
Net profit growth: +252 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+252 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: −96 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−96 ptsP/E changeShare count change: −4 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−4 ptsShare count changeShare price: +152%+152%Share priceNet profit growth: +252 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+252ProfitP/E change: −96 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−96P/EShare count change: −4 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−4SharesShare price: +152%+152%Share price
Net profit growth+252 ptsNet profit rose about 363%, which lifts the price.
P/E change-96 ptsThe P/E fell from 28.2x to 15.7x, which lowers the price.
Share count change-4 ptsShare count rose 3%, which lowers the price.
What do "pts" mean?

"pts" are percentage points of the share price return. The parts add up to the total shown for each period. Because price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count, higher profit pushes the price up, a higher P/E pushes it up, and more shares push it down.

Example: if the price rose 34% and profit growth accounts for +58 pts while a lower P/E accounts for -24 pts, then 58 - 24 = 34. The +58 is not the profit growth rate itself: it is the part of the price move that profit growth explains.

Net profit is trailing twelve months as reported with a 60-day lag.

Compare this with DLF

How rough has the ride been?

Maximum drawdown-66.3%recovered 2021-06
1-year volatility38.4%annualised
Beta vs sector index0.873-year daily, correlation 0.36
Volume spikes0last 90 sessions, 5x the 50-day median

Drawdown from peak

0%−20%−40%−60%2020202120222023202420252026−64.7% 0%−20%−40%−60%2020202220242026−64.7%
Largest drawdowns

-66.3% (2019-03 peak to 2020-03 low, recovered 2021-06)

-51.0% (2024-12 peak to 2026-03 low, not yet recovered)

-40.0% (2022-02 peak to 2022-06 low, recovered 2023-08)

Beta is the slope of daily returns against a market-cap-weighted index of the sector's other listed companies, built from today's constituents (so it excludes companies no longer listed).

Is it expensive against its own past and its peers?

15.7xP/E todayWithin its usual range
Against its own history43rd percentile
CheapestMedian 16.4xDearest

Usual range 5.3x to 34.4x since 2019-01.

Against Finance15.7x vs 18.1x
This company
15.7x
Sector median
18.1x

13% below the Finance median.

2.6x21.4x40.1x58.8xJan '19Aug '20Mar '22Oct '23May '25Nov '262.6x21.4x40.1x58.8xJan '19Sep '21May '24Nov '26
P/E (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianFinance median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/B (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianFinance median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/S (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianFinance median
How to read this

Shaded band: 10th to 90th percentile of the company's own P/E history; dotted line: its median; orange line: sector median (companies with a positive multiple, at least 5 in the sector).

Sector figures are built from today's listed companies, so they exclude companies that are no longer listed.

All terms explained in the glossary →

How Finance is valued

Where does it rank among Finance peers?

Each cell is the company's percentile rank among its Finance peers (non-financial companies) that month.
Darker is better-ranked.
Rows marked ↓ are inverted (lower debt, shorter cash cycle and a lower P/E rank higher).

Where it ranks today

  • ROCE38th▼ 3 pts vs a year ago
  • Op. margin50th▼ 18 pts vs a year ago
  • Revenue growth23rd▼ 12 pts vs a year ago
  • EPS growth64th▲ 23 pts vs a year ago
  • Debt/equity ↓90thflat vs a year ago
  • Cash cycle ↓72nd▲ 10 pts vs a year ago
  • P/E ↓63rdflat vs a year ago
  • 12M momentum63rd▲ 6 pts vs a year ago

Rank history

ROCE
Op. margin
Revenue growth
EPS growth
Debt/equity ↓
Cash cycle ↓
P/E ↓
12M momentum
Dec '21Jul '22Jan '23Jul '23Jan '24Jul '24Jan '25Jul '25Jan '26Jul '26Nov '26
Lower rank Higher rank Not enough data

Percentiles use today's listed companies in the sector and need at least 5 peers with a value; grey cells have too few.
ROE is computed from net profit and book value where the source does not report it.

The Finance sector page Watch it move against Finance in the Observatory

What is the price implying?

~17%annual earnings growth implied by the price

At a P/E of 23.6x, the price would imply about 16.6%/yr earnings growth for 10 years under the same assumptions, but it is not ranked.

Below the ₹1,000 cr market-cap floor used for the lists.

“Implied growth” is what the current price would require under our stated assumptions, not what we expect.

What prices imply across Finance The market-wide Expectations lists

Key figures

Share Priceclose 9 Nov
₹348.55
P/E
15.7x
ROCE
6.0%
Market Cap
₹729 cr
Revenue (TTM)
₹104 cr
P/S
7.0x
P/B
0.9x
ROE
5.5%
Operating Margin
28.7%
Debt / Equity
0.0x
Promoter Holding
67.7%
12M Momentum
-4.1%

52-week range

₹215.85₹390.00
76% of the way from its 52-week low to its high

Price risk

1Y volatility
38.4%
Beta vs sector
1-year daily
0.76

Balance sheet & cash

Interest cover
operating profit ÷ interest
35.5x
Cash from profit, 3Y
operating cash flow ÷ net profit
0.87x
Share count, 1Y
unchanged

Are profits backed by cash?

5 of 6checks within range1 near a threshold
Other income reliance4%Within range

Other income as a share of pre-tax profit (trailing twelve months): 3.6%. Bands: below 15%, 15% to 35%, above 35%.

Tax rate17%Within range

Median quarterly effective tax rate over about 2.5 years: 17.4%. Bands: 15% to 35%, 5% to 15% or 35% to 50%, outside 5% to 50%.

Cash conversion0.87xWithin range

Operating cash flow divided by net profit over the last three fiscal years: 0.87x (cash from operations ₹109 cr, net profit ₹126 cr). Bands: 0.8x and above, 0.5x to 0.8x, below 0.5x.

Free cash flow3 of 5 yrsNear threshold

Fiscal years with positive free cash flow in the last 5: 3. Bands: at least 80% of years, 40% to 80%, below 40%.

Receivable days vs history-7 daysWithin range

Debtor days are below the median of the previous three fiscal years by 7 days (7 vs 14). Bands: under 15 days, 15 to 45, over 45.

Capital work in progress0% of fixed assetsWithin range

Capital work-in-progress is 0% of fixed assets. Bands: not rising or up to 30%; rising for three years and above 30%; rising and above 60%.

Payable days—Not enough data

Not enough reported data to compute this.

Tap a check to see how it is measured

How to read this

Each check is a named rule with fixed thresholds, not a score. Annual statements are the latest restated figures, so a past year may differ from what was originally reported.

All terms explained in the glossary →

Who has been buying and selling?

  • Over 3 years, institutional and promoter holdings were broadly unchanged.
  • The number of shareholders fell from 7,718 to 6,969 (-10%) between Sep 2023 and Jun 2026.

Holdings, Jun '26

How each group changed

GroupSep '23Jun '26Change
Promoters67.7%67.7%0.0 pts
FIIs0.0%0.0%0.0 pts
DIIs0.0%0.1%+0.1 pts
Public and others32.3%32.2%-0.1 pts

Number of shareholders

6,969shareholders-10% since Sep '23
7k7k8k8k Sep '23Jun '24Mar '25Dec '25Jun '26
Sep '23: 7,718
Dec '23: 7,362
Mar '24: 7,305
Jun '24: 7,408
Sep '24: 8,236
Dec '24: 7,816
Mar '25: 7,664
Jun '25: 7,474
Sep '25: 7,243
Dec '25: 7,144
Mar '26: 7,004
Jun '26: 6,969
7k7k8k8k Sep '23Sep '24Sep '25Jun '26
Sep '23: 7,718
Dec '23: 7,362
Mar '24: 7,305
Jun '24: 7,408
Sep '24: 8,236
Dec '24: 7,816
Mar '25: 7,664
Jun '25: 7,474
Sep '25: 7,243
Dec '25: 7,144
Mar '26: 7,004
Jun '26: 6,969

Quarterly shareholding as reported, labelled by the quarter it covers (it becomes visible about two months later).
Shareholder counts are only available for recent quarters.

This quarter's smart-money board

What happened next to similar setups

−3.3%typical 12-month return vs the marketNot meaningfully different from the base rate
  • We found 50 past situations where a non-financial company looked like GEECEE VENTURES LIMITED today on valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, price momentum, size and volatility.
  • Over the following 12 months the middle half of them returned −19% to +34% vs the market, against −2% for all non-financial companies in the same months.
  • The gap against the base rate (−1.6%, 80% range −7.2% to +5.7%) is within what chance and overlapping periods produce.

Where the 50 outcomes landed

−100%−50%0%+50%+100%
JUSTDIAL · Apr 2025: −47.4% vs market
NOCIL · Jul 2024: −40.4% vs market
NINSYS · Feb 2025: −39.9% vs market
INDBANK · Oct 2025: −38.3% vs market
IVC · Jun 2024: −33.9% vs market
QUICKHEAL · May 2021: −31.2% vs market
MOIL · Aug 2020: −29.0% vs market
ELDEHSG · Apr 2024: −26.9% vs market
TREL · Jun 2025: −26.2% vs market
SURANAT&P · Jan 2025: −23.2% vs market
EIMCOELECO · Sep 2020: −22.6% vs market
ADVENZYMES · Dec 2023: −21.1% vs market
SASKEN · Jun 2024: −19.6% vs market
SANDESH · Jan 2021: −18.8% vs market
HINDCOMPOS · Sep 2025: −16.5% vs market
UNITEDTEA · Mar 2020: −14.0% vs market
GANGESSECU · Jun 2022: −13.9% vs market
GUJAPOLLO · Feb 2023: −12.1% vs market
SILINV · Feb 2022: −11.4% vs market
STEL · Jun 2021: −10.0% vs market
XCHANGING · Jun 2023: −6.9% vs market
RAMCOIND · Oct 2020: −6.7% vs market
VLSFINANCE · Jan 2024: −5.0% vs market
SREEL · Apr 2022: −4.0% vs market
AMJLAND · Feb 2020: −3.9% vs market
CONTROLPR · Apr 2020: −2.7% vs market
TREJHARA · Nov 2024: +0.5% vs market
GANDHITUBE · Apr 2021: +2.8% vs market
TAINWALCHM · Sep 2024: +3.2% vs market
UNIENTER · Oct 2022: +6.1% vs market
WONDERLA · May 2021: +6.2% vs market
KSCL · Apr 2023: +10.5% vs market
OSWALGREEN · Jan 2023: +15.2% vs market
PRIMESECU · Jun 2023: +15.6% vs market
CARERATING · Jan 2023: +21.2% vs market
ANTELOPUS · May 2022: +24.9% vs market
TTKHLTCARE · Mar 2022: +31.7% vs market
GPPL · Jan 2023: +34.9% vs market
MODIRUBBER · Apr 2020: +53.8% vs market
ALEMBICLTD · Feb 2020: +55.4% vs market
NSIL · Jul 2024: +58.4% vs market
DIVGIITTS · Oct 2025: +60.3% vs market
NUCLEUS · Feb 2023: +65.2% vs market
SUMMITSEC · Jun 2023: +75.2% vs market
GMDCLTD · Feb 2021: +78.1% vs market
ANUP · Apr 2023: +112.2% vs market
BSE · Dec 2020: +128.7% vs market
TECHNOE · Jul 2023: +135.6% vs market
CUPID · Sep 2023: +177.2% vs market
BLS · Jul 2021: +196.7% vs market
Similar setups −3.3%All companies −1.7%← worse than the marketbetter than the market →

Each dot is one past situation (hover or tap for details) · Solid dots are the closest matches, listed below · Shaded is the middle half of all companies in the same months · 5 beyond the range shown, drawn at the edge

Similar setups' median
−3.3%
All companies' median
−1.7%
Beat the market
48% vs 48%

50 past situations · 50 companies · 38 months · 2020–2025

The closest matches

CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
SILINV
Finance
Feb 2022 17x3% +67%−13% −11%
XCHANGING
Technology Services
Jun 2023 21x9% +49%0% −7%
OSWALGREEN
Finance
Jan 2023 16x3% −8%−19% +15%
SUMMITSEC
Finance
Jun 2023 21x1% +32%−1% +75%
STEL
Finance
Jun 2021 25x2% +97%−3% −10%
Show the other 3 matches
CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
TECHNOE
Industrial Services
Jul 2023 28x8% +67%0% +136%
HINDCOMPOS
Producer Manufacturing
Sep 2025 19x5% −19%−22% −17%
BSE
Finance
Dec 2020 23x5% +24%−1% +129%
How reliable is this?

Matched on P/E, P/S, ROCE, operating margin, debt/equity, interest cover, revenue growth, 12-month momentum, drawdown from 12-month high, size and volatility. Closest on: 12-month momentum, size and drawdown from 12-month high. One match per company and at most 7 from any one month.

Independent periods: the matches fall in 6 distinct 12-month windows. Matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, so fewer windows means less evidence.

How this is built

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to GEECEE VENTURES LIMITED. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

Methodology

How historical analogs are built

Data as of 2026-11-09. Outcome pool: Jan 2020 to Oct 2025.

For every company we look at the situation it is in today (valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, 12-month price momentum, drawdown, size and volatility) and find past company-months that looked most like it. We then show what happened to those past situations over the following 12 months, measured against the ApnaFunda All index and against the base rate. It describes history. It does not predict anything.

What is compared

FeatureWeightNon-financialFinancial
P/E1yesyes
P/S1yes—
P/B1—yes
ROCE1yes—
operating margin1yes—
ROE1—yes
debt/equity0.75yes—
interest cover0.5yes—
revenue growth0.75yesyes
12-month momentum1yesyes
drawdown from 12-month high0.75yesyes
size0.75yesyes
volatility0.5yesyes

Weights were set by judgement before any outcome was looked at and are never tuned on results. Loss-making companies (negative P/E or net profit) are only matched with other loss-making companies. Banks, NBFCs and insurers are compared only with each other and use a different feature set. Every feature is converted, month by month, to its rank among companies in the same pool in that month, so a P/E of 30 in a hot market and a P/E of 22 in a cold one can match if both were equally expensive for their time. Only that month's data is used.

How closeness and the sample are defined

Distance is the weighted root-mean-square gap between the standardised features both companies have. A match needs at least 70% of the query's feature weight, a distance of at most 0.9, and 30 matches at minimum to be shown. We keep up to 50 matches with these exclusions: never the company itself, one match per company (its closest month), and at most 7 from any one calendar month so a single market episode cannot dominate.

Base rate

The base rate is the distribution of 12-month returns, relative to the market, of every eligible company-month in the same pool, with each month weighted to match the months the analogs came from. It answers: how did a random company do in these same months? Because matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, we also report the number of distinct 12-month windows behind a result, and a bootstrap that resamples months decides whether the analog median differs from the base rate at all. "Not meaningfully different" is the usual outcome and the page copy is written for it.

Limits you should know

  • One market period. The outcome pool covers 2020–2025 only (70 months), including the 2020 crash and the 2020–21 rally.
  • Survivorship. Only companies listed today are included. Delisted and bankrupt companies are missing, which flatters past outcomes, particularly for distressed-looking setups.
  • Price return only. Dividends are excluded, and the benchmark is an ApnaFunda market-cap-weighted index of the same listed companies, not an official index.
  • Reporting lag. Fundamentals are matched on an assumed 60-day lag after the quarter end, not on real announcement dates.
  • Pools: non-financial: 98,395 company-months from 2019 companies; financial: 5,659 company-months from 108 companies. 2349 companies currently have a result; the rest are suppressed because too few comparable situations exist.

Does it work? A walk-forward check

The walk-forward check has not been run for this build, so skill is shown as not yet measured.

Disclaimer

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to any company shown. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

What else looks like this?

Companies with the most similar financial profile today, regardless of industry.

ALEMBICALEMBICLTD
Health Technology
60%similar
ROCEoperating margin
Consumer Services
47%similar
EPS growthoperating margin
Industrial Services
44%similar
promoter holdingoperating margin
Consumer Non-Durables
38%similar
market capvolatility
Process Industries
36%similar
EPS growthrevenue growth
Finance
69%similar
debt/equityrevenue
Finance
60%similar
debt/equityrevenue
JINDAL PHOTOJINDALPHOT
Finance
55%similar
revenue growthrevenue

Similarity is statistical, based on reported metrics; it does not imply similar business quality or future returns.

What changed?

30 events since Jun '23

  1. SepResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned positive.
  2. SepPeer rankSlipped to the 3rd quartile of Finance on operating margin (from the top quartile).
  3. JunPeer rankMoved into the top quartile of Finance on operating margin (from the 2nd quartile).
  4. MayPriceVolume reached 81.0x its 50-day median on 2026-05-18; price +10.3% that day.
  5. MarPriceFell 51% from the Dec 2024 peak to the Mar 2026 low.
  6. MarPeer rankSlipped to the 2nd quartile of Finance on operating margin (from the top quartile).
  7. FebPriceVolume reached 9.3x its 50-day median on 2026-02-11; price -4.5% that day.
  8. DecPeer rankMoved into the top quartile of Finance on operating margin (from the 2nd quartile).
Show 22 earlier events
  1. OctPriceVolume reached 31.5x its 50-day median on 2025-10-10; price +11.0% that day.
  2. SepResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned negative.
  3. SepPeer rankSlipped to the 3rd quartile of Finance on EPS growth (from the 2nd quartile).
  4. JunPeer rankSlipped to the 2nd quartile of Finance on EPS growth (from the top quartile).
  5. MayPriceVolume reached 23.3x its 50-day median on 2025-05-22; price -8.3% that day.
  6. FebPriceVolume reached 12.8x its 50-day median on 2025-02-05; price +9.2% that day.
  7. DecPriceVolume reached 9.8x its 50-day median on 2024-12-02; price +5.2% that day.
  8. SepPriceVolume reached 46.6x its 50-day median on 2024-09-24; price +12.8% that day.
  9. JunResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned positive.
  10. JunPeer rankMoved into the top quartile of Finance on EPS growth (from the bottom quartile).
  11. JunDividendDividend payout cut from 36% to 11% of profit.
  12. MayPriceVolume reached 39.3x its 50-day median on 2024-05-23; price -4.0% that day.
  13. FebPeer rankSlipped to the bottom quartile of Finance on EPS growth (from the 3rd quartile).
  14. FebPriceVolume reached 13.7x its 50-day median on 2024-02-09; price -6.0% that day.
  15. DecPeer rankMoved into the 3rd quartile of Finance on EPS growth (from the bottom quartile).
  16. NovPriceVolume reached 39.0x its 50-day median on 2023-11-09; price +14.1% that day.
  17. AugPriceRegained the 2022-02 peak, 14 months after the low.
  18. AugPriceVolume reached 23.8x its 50-day median on 2023-08-22; price +3.7% that day.
  19. JunResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned negative.
  20. JunValuationP/E crossed above the 90th percentile of its own history to date (32.1x).
  21. JunPeer rankSlipped to the bottom quartile of Finance on EPS growth (from the 2nd quartile).
  22. JunDividendStarted paying a dividend (payout 36% of profit).

Events are generated from the data by fixed rules.
The month shown is when the change became visible in the reported figures, assuming a 60-day lag after each quarter end; it is not an announcement date.

Where price and fundamentals disagree, market-wide Rewind the whole market to any month

Monthly history95 months · 2019-01 to 2026-11
MonthP/ERevenue (TTM)ROEROCEDebt / Equity
2026-1115.7x₹104 cr5.5%6.0%0.0x
2026-1015.9x₹104 cr5.6%6.0%0.0x
2026-0916.9x₹104 cr5.6%6.0%0.0x
2026-0818.4x₹75 cr5.0%6.0%0.0x
2026-0717.5x₹75 cr5.0%6.0%0.0x
2026-0617.2x₹75 cr5.0%6.0%0.0x
2026-0529.5x₹57 cr2.9%8.0%0.0x
2026-0427.6x₹57 cr2.9%8.0%0.0x
2026-0320.6x₹57 cr2.9%8.0%0.0x
2026-0216.3x₹100 cr4.7%8.0%0.0x
2026-0117.4x₹100 cr4.7%8.0%0.0x
2025-1217.9x₹100 cr4.7%8.0%0.0x
2025-1119.4x₹111 cr5.0%8.0%0.0x
2025-1018.0x₹111 cr5.0%8.0%0.0x
2025-0919.1x₹111 cr5.0%8.0%0.0x
2025-0815.8x₹135 cr6.0%8.0%0.0x
2025-0716.5x₹135 cr6.0%8.0%0.0x
2025-0617.3x₹135 cr6.0%8.0%0.0x
2025-0513.6x₹182 cr9.4%7.0%0.0x
2025-0412.6x₹182 cr9.4%7.0%0.0x
2025-0312.6x₹182 cr9.4%7.0%0.0x
2025-0215.0x₹137 cr7.8%7.0%0.0x
2025-0116.6x₹137 cr7.8%7.0%0.0x
2024-1218.1x₹137 cr7.8%7.0%0.0x
2024-1120.8x₹117 cr6.6%7.0%0.0x
2024-1019.8x₹117 cr6.6%7.0%0.0x
2024-0920.4x₹117 cr6.6%7.0%0.0x
2024-0822.3x₹97 cr5.8%7.0%0.0x
2024-0721.5x₹97 cr5.8%7.0%0.0x
2024-0621.4x₹97 cr5.8%7.0%0.0x
2024-0558.8x₹40 cr2.1%3.0%0.0x
2024-0455.4x₹40 cr2.1%3.0%0.0x
2024-0346.0x₹40 cr2.1%3.0%0.0x
2024-0248.2x₹40 cr2.1%3.0%0.0x
2024-0150.2x₹40 cr2.1%3.0%0.0x
2023-1241.1x₹40 cr2.1%3.0%0.0x
2023-1137.3x₹40 cr2.1%3.0%0.0x
2023-1035.8x₹40 cr2.1%3.0%0.0x
2023-0937.5x₹40 cr2.1%3.0%0.0x
2023-0832.0x₹40 cr2.1%3.0%0.0x
2023-0732.0x₹40 cr2.1%3.0%0.0x
2023-0632.1x₹40 cr2.1%3.0%0.0x
2023-0515.7x₹96 cr3.5%5.0%0.0x
2023-0414.8x₹96 cr3.5%5.0%0.0x
2023-0313.8x₹96 cr3.5%5.0%0.0x
2023-0214.9x₹96 cr3.5%5.0%0.0x
2023-0115.3x₹96 cr3.5%5.0%0.0x
2022-1216.3x₹96 cr3.5%5.0%0.0x
2022-1117.5x₹96 cr3.5%5.0%0.0x
2022-1016.4x₹96 cr3.5%5.0%0.0x
2022-0915.9x₹96 cr3.5%5.0%0.0x
2022-0815.9x₹96 cr3.5%5.0%0.0x
2022-0715.0x₹96 cr3.5%5.0%0.0x
2022-0613.9x₹96 cr3.5%5.0%0.0x
2022-0526.4x₹42 cr2.1%4.0%0.0x
2022-0431.7x₹42 cr2.1%4.0%0.0x
2022-0330.6x₹42 cr2.1%4.0%0.0x
2022-0234.4x₹42 cr2.1%4.0%0.0x
2022-0130.9x₹42 cr2.1%4.0%0.0x
2021-1230.2x₹42 cr2.1%4.0%0.0x
2021-1128.2x₹42 cr2.1%4.0%0.0x
2021-1030.0x₹42 cr2.1%4.0%0.0x
2021-0932.1x₹42 cr2.1%4.0%0.0x
2021-0828.9x₹42 cr2.1%4.0%0.0x
2021-0734.4x₹42 cr2.1%4.0%0.0x
2021-0632.2x₹42 cr2.1%4.0%0.0x
2021-0515.1x₹45 cr3.7%4.0%0.0x
2021-0413.2x₹45 cr3.7%4.0%0.0x
2021-0313.2x₹45 cr3.7%4.0%0.0x
2021-0212.5x₹45 cr3.7%4.0%0.0x
2021-0110.8x₹45 cr3.7%4.0%0.0x
2020-1211.4x₹45 cr3.7%4.0%0.0x
2020-119.7x₹45 cr3.7%4.0%0.0x
2020-109.3x₹45 cr3.7%4.0%0.0x
2020-098.6x₹45 cr3.7%4.0%0.0x
2020-089.8x₹45 cr3.7%4.0%0.0x
2020-078.6x₹45 cr3.7%4.0%0.0x
2020-069.0x₹45 cr3.7%4.0%0.0x
2020-052.9x₹150 cr7.9%9.0%0.0x
2020-043.1x₹150 cr7.9%9.0%0.0x
2020-032.6x₹150 cr7.9%9.0%0.0x
2020-024.2x₹150 cr7.9%9.0%0.0x
2020-015.2x₹150 cr7.9%9.0%0.0x
2019-124.7x₹150 cr7.9%9.0%0.0x
2019-114.8x₹150 cr7.9%9.0%0.0x
2019-105.3x₹150 cr7.9%9.0%0.0x
2019-095.4x₹150 cr7.9%9.0%0.0x
2019-084.8x₹150 cr7.9%9.0%0.0x
2019-075.1x₹150 cr7.9%9.0%0.0x
2019-066.7x₹150 cr7.9%9.0%0.0x
2019-058.4x₹201 cr7.6%8.0%0.0x
2019-048.4x₹201 cr7.6%8.0%0.0x
2019-038.5x₹201 cr7.6%8.0%0.0x
2019-027.8x₹201 cr7.6%8.0%0.0x
2019-017.6x₹201 cr7.6%8.0%0.0x

Methodology and data notes

Methodology

Methodology and data notes

All figures come from public exchange prices and screener.in financial statements. Quarterly and annual results are shown from 60 days after the period end, so a month never uses a result before it would plausibly have been published. Statements are the latest versions, which may include later restatements.

Sector medians, percentiles and indices use today's listed companies in the sector (survivorship bias). Prices are adjusted for splits and bonus issues; around a corporate action the fundamentals may lag the price by up to a month, and affected sections are hidden.

The return decomposition uses price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count. The reverse DCF uses a fixed 12% cost of equity, a 10-year horizon and a 15x terminal P/E, and is an illustration only. Events, flags and twins follow fixed rules and thresholds described next to each section.

Feedback