अApnaFunda
Menu

BIGBLOC CONSTRUCTION LIMITED (BIGBLOC)

Non-Energy Minerals · Construction Materials · figures to Nov '26

Quality scoreHow the business itself ranks against its sector peers on profitability, 3-year growth and leverage. 50 is the middle of the sector.25 / 100
Profitability 26Growth 41Balance sheet 8
Compare withULTRATECH CEMENTGRASIM INDUSTRIESAMBUJA CEMENTS

Share price

Closing priceAdjusted for splits and bonus issues.

₹34.35 latest close · −29.9% over the last 90 sessions

₹35₹40₹45₹50Jul 3Jul 29Aug 24Sep 17Oct 14Nov 9 ₹35₹40₹45₹50Jul 3Sep 4Nov 9

₹34.35 month-end · −46.3% over 12 months

₹40₹60₹80Nov '25Jan '26Apr '26Jun '26Sep '26Nov '26 ₹40₹60₹80Nov '25May '26Nov '26

₹34.35 month-end · −56.1% over 3 years

₹50₹100Nov '23Jun '24Jan '25Sep '25Apr '26Nov '26 ₹50₹100Nov '23May '25Nov '26

₹34.35 month-end · +1135.6% since Jun '19

₹0₹50₹100Jun '19Dec '20Jun '22Nov '23May '25Nov '26 ₹0₹50₹100Jun '19Mar '23Nov '26

52-week range ₹32.10 to ₹80.00 · 1-year volatility 55.4%

Was the rally earned?

-46%share price, 1 yearMultiple-driven

Mostly the multiple.

  • Most of the fall came from investors paying a lower multiple (P/E 456.7x to 286.2x); per-share earnings took off 11 points.
  • The share count barely moved.
Net profit growth: −11 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).−11 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: −35 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−35 ptsP/E changeShare price: −46%−46%Share priceNet profit growth: −11 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).−11ProfitP/E change: −35 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−35P/EShare price: −46%−46%Share price
Net profit growth-11 ptsNet profit fell about 14%, which lowers the price.
P/E change-35 ptsThe P/E fell from 456.7x to 286.2x, which lowers the price.
Share count change0 ptsShare count was little changed. More shares would count against the price.
-56%share price, 3 yearsEarnings-driven

Mostly earnings.

  • Per-share earnings took off 196 points, while the multiple moved less (P/E 36.6x to 286.2x).
  • The share count rose 405%.
Net profit growth: −86 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).−86 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: +140 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+140 ptsP/E changeShare count change: −110 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−110 ptsShare count changeShare price: −56%−56%Share priceNet profit growth: −86 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).−86ProfitP/E change: +140 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+140P/EShare count change: −110 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−110SharesShare price: −56%−56%Share price
Net profit growth-86 ptsNet profit fell about 72%, which lowers the price.
P/E change+140 ptsThe P/E rose from 36.6x to 286.2x, which lifts the price.
Share count change-110 ptsShare count rose 405%, which lowers the price.
+66%share price, 5 yearsMultiple-driven

Partly.

  • Most of the rise came from investors paying a higher multiple (P/E 121.6x to 286.2x); per-share earnings took off 45 points.
  • The share count rose 100%.
Net profit growth: +45 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+45 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: +112 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+112 ptsP/E changeShare count change: −90 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−90 ptsShare count changeShare price: +66%+66%Share priceNet profit growth: +45 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+45ProfitP/E change: +112 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+112P/EShare count change: −90 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−90SharesShare price: +66%+66%Share price
Net profit growth+45 ptsNet profit rose about 41%, which lifts the price.
P/E change+112 ptsThe P/E rose from 121.6x to 286.2x, which lifts the price.
Share count change-90 ptsShare count rose 100%, which lowers the price.
What do "pts" mean?

"pts" are percentage points of the share price return. The parts add up to the total shown for each period. Because price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count, higher profit pushes the price up, a higher P/E pushes it up, and more shares push it down.

Example: if the price rose 34% and profit growth accounts for +58 pts while a lower P/E accounts for -24 pts, then 58 - 24 = 34. The +58 is not the profit growth rate itself: it is the part of the price move that profit growth explains.

Net profit is trailing twelve months as reported with a 60-day lag.

Compare this with ULTRATECH CEMENT

How rough has the ride been?

Maximum drawdown-76.4%not yet recovered
1-year volatility55.4%annualised

Drawdown from peak

0%−25%−50%−75%2020202120222023202420252026−76.0% 0%−25%−50%−75%2020202220242026−76.0%
Largest drawdowns

-76.4% (2024-10 peak to 2026-10 low, not yet recovered)

-55.1% (2020-12 peak to 2021-04 low, recovered 2021-11)

-42.3% (2019-05 peak to 2019-10 low, recovered 2020-01)

Is it expensive against its own past and its peers?

286.3xP/E todayNear its historic high
Against its own history90th percentile
CheapestMedian 58.4xDearest

Usual range 38.1x to 289.1x since 2019-06.

Against Non-Energy Minerals286.3x vs 21.8x
This company
286.3x
Sector median
21.8x

1214% above the Non-Energy Minerals median.

8.6x158.0x307.3x456.7xJun '19Dec '20Jun '22Dec '23Jun '25Nov '268.6x158.0x307.3x456.7xJun '19Dec '21Jun '24Nov '26
P/E (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianNon-Energy Minerals median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/B (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianNon-Energy Minerals median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/S (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianNon-Energy Minerals median
How to read this

Shaded band: 10th to 90th percentile of the company's own P/E history; dotted line: its median; orange line: sector median (companies with a positive multiple, at least 5 in the sector).

Sector figures are built from today's listed companies, so they exclude companies that are no longer listed.

All terms explained in the glossary →

How Non-Energy Minerals is valued

Where does it rank among Non-Energy Minerals peers?

Each cell is the company's percentile rank among its Non-Energy Minerals peers (non-financial companies) that month.
Darker is better-ranked.
Rows marked ↓ are inverted (lower debt, shorter cash cycle and a lower P/E rank higher).

Where it ranks today

  • ROCE16th▼ 13 pts vs a year ago
  • Op. margin37th▲ 27 pts vs a year ago
  • Revenue growth86th▲ 59 pts vs a year ago
  • EPS growth27th▲ 21 pts vs a year ago
  • Debt/equity ↓7th▼ 5 pts vs a year ago
  • Cash cycle ↓62nd▲ 5 pts vs a year ago
  • P/E ↓3rdflat vs a year ago
  • 12M momentum4th▼ 7 pts vs a year ago

Rank history

ROCE
Op. margin
Revenue growth
EPS growth
Debt/equity ↓
Cash cycle ↓
P/E ↓
12M momentum
Dec '21Jul '22Jan '23Jul '23Jan '24Jul '24Jan '25Jul '25Jan '26Jul '26Nov '26
Lower rank Higher rank Not enough data

Percentiles use today's listed companies in the sector and need at least 5 peers with a value; grey cells have too few.
ROE is computed from net profit and book value where the source does not report it.

The Non-Energy Minerals sector page Watch it move against Non-Energy Minerals in the Observatory

What is the price implying?

~21%annual earnings growth implied by the price

At a P/E of 33.8x, the price would imply about 21.0%/yr earnings growth for 10 years under the same assumptions, but it is not ranked.

Fewer than six years of annual earnings are available, which is too little to measure delivered growth.

“Implied growth” is what the current price would require under our stated assumptions, not what we expect.

What prices imply across Non-Energy Minerals The market-wide Expectations lists

Key figures

Share Priceclose 9 Nov
₹34.35
P/E
286.3x
ROCE
2.0%
Market Cap
₹486 cr
Revenue (TTM)
₹306 cr
P/S
1.6x
P/B
3.5x
ROE
1.2%
Operating Margin
7.9%
Debt / Equity
1.5x
Promoter Holding
72.8%
12M Momentum
-46.3%

52-week range

₹32.10₹80.00
5% of the way from its 52-week low to its high

Price risk

1Y volatility
55.4%
Beta vs sector
1-year daily
0.83

Balance sheet & cash

Interest cover
operating profit ÷ interest
0.8x
Cash from profit, 3Y
operating cash flow ÷ net profit
1.96x
Share count, 1Y
unchanged

Are profits backed by cash?

4 of 5checks within range1 beyond a threshold
Other income reliance—Not enough data

Not enough reported data to compute this.

Tax rate—Not enough data

Not enough reported data to compute this.

Cash conversion1.96xWithin range

Operating cash flow divided by net profit over the last three fiscal years: 1.96x (cash from operations ₹51 cr, net profit ₹26 cr). Bands: 0.8x and above, 0.5x to 0.8x, below 0.5x.

Free cash flow1 of 5 yrsBeyond threshold

Fiscal years with positive free cash flow in the last 5: 1. Bands: at least 80% of years, 40% to 80%, below 40%.

Receivable days vs history+8 daysWithin range

Debtor days are above the median of the previous three fiscal years by 8 days (86 vs 78). Bands: under 15 days, 15 to 45, over 45.

Capital work in progress4% of fixed assetsWithin range

Capital work-in-progress is 4% of fixed assets. Bands: not rising or up to 30%; rising for three years and above 30%; rising and above 60%.

Payable days-9 days / 2 yrsWithin range

Days payable changed by -9 over two years. Bands: rise of up to 30 days; more than 30 days.

Tap a check to see how it is measured

How to read this

Each check is a named rule with fixed thresholds, not a score. Annual statements are the latest restated figures, so a past year may differ from what was originally reported.

All terms explained in the glossary →

Who has been buying and selling?

  • Over 3 years, promoters added 0.5 pts.
  • The number of shareholders rose from 26,052 to 42,369 (+63%) between Sep 2023 and Jun 2026.

Holdings, Jun '26

How each group changed

GroupSep '23Jun '26Change
Promoters72.3%72.8%+0.5 pts
FIIs0.0%0.2%+0.2 pts
DIIs0.0%0.0%0.0 pts
Public and others27.7%27.0%-0.8 pts

Number of shareholders

42,369shareholders+63% since Sep '23
26k34k42k50k Sep '23Jun '24Mar '25Dec '25Jun '26
Sep '23: 26,052
Dec '23: 28,830
Mar '24: 32,621
Jun '24: 36,440
Sep '24: 45,159
Dec '24: 50,011
Mar '25: 50,148
Jun '25: 49,725
Sep '25: 47,975
Dec '25: 44,881
Mar '26: 42,990
Jun '26: 42,369
 26k34k42k50k Sep '23Sep '24Sep '25Jun '26
Sep '23: 26,052
Dec '23: 28,830
Mar '24: 32,621
Jun '24: 36,440
Sep '24: 45,159
Dec '24: 50,011
Mar '25: 50,148
Jun '25: 49,725
Sep '25: 47,975
Dec '25: 44,881
Mar '26: 42,990
Jun '26: 42,369

Quarterly shareholding as reported, labelled by the quarter it covers (it becomes visible about two months later).
Shareholder counts are only available for recent quarters.

This quarter's smart-money board

What happened next to similar setups

+6.8%typical 12-month return vs the marketAbove the base rate
  • We found 50 past situations where a non-financial company looked like BIGBLOC CONSTRUCTION LIMITED today on valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, price momentum, size and volatility.
  • Over the following 12 months the middle half of them returned −13% to +33% vs the market, against 0% for all non-financial companies in the same months.
  • The analogs' median sat above that base rate (gap +6.8%, 80% range +0.6% to +15.3%), but the matches cluster in only 6 distinct 12-month windows.

Where the 50 outcomes landed

−100%−50%0%+50%+100%
PALREDTEC · Mar 2024: −66.7% vs market
HERANBA · Oct 2025: −48.9% vs market
MTNL · Jul 2025: −43.9% vs market
SEPC · Jun 2020: −41.3% vs market
DYNPRO · Jun 2023: −38.3% vs market
ACLGATI · Dec 2023: −38.2% vs market
SUNCLAY · Oct 2025: −27.6% vs market
SHAH · Mar 2020: −17.6% vs market
CINELINE · Sep 2024: −16.4% vs market
KOHINOOR · Jul 2024: −15.9% vs market
SNOWMAN · Oct 2021: −15.0% vs market
PURVA · Apr 2025: −13.8% vs market
PRAXIS · Sep 2020: −13.3% vs market
SPENCERS · Feb 2021: −13.2% vs market
INDSWFTLAB · Feb 2022: −9.4% vs market
COFFEEDAY · Jun 2023: −4.2% vs market
WALCHANNAG · Sep 2021: −3.3% vs market
SICALLOG · Jun 2025: −0.4% vs market
HERITGFOOD · Jan 2021: +0.5% vs market
RUCHINFRA · May 2021: +2.6% vs market
SHIVAMAUTO · Mar 2020: +4.0% vs market
LYKALABS · Jun 2024: +4.6% vs market
NEXTMEDIA · Aug 2023: +5.6% vs market
PROZONER · Jun 2022: +5.6% vs market
ACL · Sep 2024: +5.7% vs market
TITAGARH · May 2020: +7.9% vs market
RAMANEWS · Aug 2023: +10.0% vs market
HCG · Jan 2020: +10.3% vs market
BRNL · Jul 2023: +15.3% vs market
SAMPANN · Jan 2023: +16.8% vs market
OMAXE · Feb 2023: +18.7% vs market
IBULLSLTD · Aug 2020: +21.3% vs market
KRITI · May 2024: +22.9% vs market
PFOCUS · Oct 2020: +26.4% vs market
KDDL · Jun 2020: +26.6% vs market
ASAHISONG · Sep 2023: +27.1% vs market
BANKA · May 2025: +29.4% vs market
ONIDA · Jun 2020: +33.5% vs market
ZUARIIND · Feb 2020: +39.1% vs market
NILAINFRA · Nov 2023: +42.8% vs market
DREDGECORP · Jun 2025: +53.8% vs market
VIPULLTD · Apr 2023: +66.5% vs market
ENERGYDEV · Aug 2021: +70.8% vs market
KHADIM · Jul 2020: +72.6% vs market
CENTUM · Feb 2025: +87.2% vs market
PCJEWELLER · Jan 2024: +141.9% vs market
SUMIT · Jul 2022: +161.1% vs market
DBREALTY · Feb 2020: +172.1% vs market
BLKASHYAP · Jul 2020: +190.4% vs market
GANESHHOU · Jul 2020: +195.7% vs market
Similar setups +6.8%All companies 0%← worse than the marketbetter than the market →

Each dot is one past situation (hover or tap for details) · Solid dots are the closest matches, listed below · Shaded is the middle half of all companies in the same months · 5 beyond the range shown, drawn at the edge

Similar setups' median
+6.8%
All companies' median
0%
Beat the market
64% vs 50%

50 past situations · 50 companies · 39 months · 2020–2025

The closest matches

CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
SHIVAMAUTO
Producer Manufacturing		 Mar 2020 —6% −74%−77% +4%
ONIDA
Consumer Durables		 Jun 2020 —-3% −51%−52% +34%
IBULLSLTD
Finance		 Aug 2020 —1% −39%−65% +21%
HCG
Health Services		 Jan 2020 —3% −42%−47% +10%
DYNPRO
Consumer Non-Durables		 Jun 2023 —4% −23%−34% −38%
Show the other 3 matches
CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
OMAXE
Finance		 Feb 2023 —-3% −40%−48% +19%
CINELINE
Consumer Services		 Sep 2024 —5% 0%−29% −16%
WALCHANNAG
Producer Manufacturing		 Sep 2021 —3% +18%−33% −3%
How reliable is this?

Matched on P/E, P/S, ROCE, operating margin, debt/equity, interest cover, revenue growth, 12-month momentum, drawdown from 12-month high, size and volatility. Closest on: interest cover, 12-month momentum and drawdown from 12-month high. This company is loss-making, so it was only compared with loss-making companies. One match per company and at most 7 from any one month.

Independent periods: the matches fall in 6 distinct 12-month windows. Matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, so fewer windows means less evidence.

How this is built

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to BIGBLOC CONSTRUCTION LIMITED. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

Methodology

How historical analogs are built

Data as of 2026-11-09. Outcome pool: Jan 2020 to Oct 2025.

For every company we look at the situation it is in today (valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, 12-month price momentum, drawdown, size and volatility) and find past company-months that looked most like it. We then show what happened to those past situations over the following 12 months, measured against the ApnaFunda All index and against the base rate. It describes history. It does not predict anything.

What is compared

FeatureWeightNon-financialFinancial
P/E1yesyes
P/S1yes—
P/B1—yes
ROCE1yes—
operating margin1yes—
ROE1—yes
debt/equity0.75yes—
interest cover0.5yes—
revenue growth0.75yesyes
12-month momentum1yesyes
drawdown from 12-month high0.75yesyes
size0.75yesyes
volatility0.5yesyes

Weights were set by judgement before any outcome was looked at and are never tuned on results. Loss-making companies (negative P/E or net profit) are only matched with other loss-making companies. Banks, NBFCs and insurers are compared only with each other and use a different feature set. Every feature is converted, month by month, to its rank among companies in the same pool in that month, so a P/E of 30 in a hot market and a P/E of 22 in a cold one can match if both were equally expensive for their time. Only that month's data is used.

How closeness and the sample are defined

Distance is the weighted root-mean-square gap between the standardised features both companies have. A match needs at least 70% of the query's feature weight, a distance of at most 0.9, and 30 matches at minimum to be shown. We keep up to 50 matches with these exclusions: never the company itself, one match per company (its closest month), and at most 7 from any one calendar month so a single market episode cannot dominate.

Base rate

The base rate is the distribution of 12-month returns, relative to the market, of every eligible company-month in the same pool, with each month weighted to match the months the analogs came from. It answers: how did a random company do in these same months? Because matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, we also report the number of distinct 12-month windows behind a result, and a bootstrap that resamples months decides whether the analog median differs from the base rate at all. "Not meaningfully different" is the usual outcome and the page copy is written for it.

Limits you should know

  • One market period. The outcome pool covers 2020–2025 only (70 months), including the 2020 crash and the 2020–21 rally.
  • Survivorship. Only companies listed today are included. Delisted and bankrupt companies are missing, which flatters past outcomes, particularly for distressed-looking setups.
  • Price return only. Dividends are excluded, and the benchmark is an ApnaFunda market-cap-weighted index of the same listed companies, not an official index.
  • Reporting lag. Fundamentals are matched on an assumed 60-day lag after the quarter end, not on real announcement dates.
  • Pools: non-financial: 98,395 company-months from 2019 companies; financial: 5,659 company-months from 108 companies. 2349 companies currently have a result; the rest are suppressed because too few comparable situations exist.

Does it work? A walk-forward check

The walk-forward check has not been run for this build, so skill is shown as not yet measured.

Disclaimer

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to any company shown. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

What changed?

30 events since Jun '22

  1. OctPriceFell 76% from the Oct 2024 peak to the Oct 2026 low.
  2. SepResultsEPS (TTM) turned positive.
  3. SepValuationP/E crossed above the 90th percentile of its own history to date (331.6x).
  4. SepPeer rankMoved into the 3rd quartile of Non-Energy Minerals on EPS growth (from the bottom quartile).
  5. JunPeer rankSlipped to the bottom quartile of Non-Energy Minerals on ROCE (from the 3rd quartile).
  6. MarPeer rankMoved into the 2nd quartile of Non-Energy Minerals on operating margin (from the bottom quartile).
  7. DecResultsEPS (TTM) turned negative.
  8. SepValuationP/E crossed above the 90th percentile of its own history to date (403.0x).
Show 22 earlier events
  1. SepPeer rankSlipped to the bottom quartile of Non-Energy Minerals on operating margin (from the 3rd quartile).
  2. JunPeer rankSlipped to the 3rd quartile of Non-Energy Minerals on ROCE (from the top quartile).
  3. JunDividendDividend payout cut from 9% to 0% of profit.
  4. JunSharesShare count is up 100.0% over 12 months.
  5. DecPeer rankSlipped to the 2nd quartile of Non-Energy Minerals on operating margin (from the top quartile).
  6. SepResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned negative.
  7. JunResultsRevenue (TTM) reached a new high of ₹243 cr.
  8. JunPeer rankSlipped to the 3rd quartile of Non-Energy Minerals on EPS growth (from the top quartile).
  9. MayPriceRegained the 2024-02 peak, 2 months after the low.
  10. MarPriceFell 31% from the Feb 2024 peak to the Mar 2024 low.
  11. JunResultsRevenue (TTM) reached a new high of ₹200 cr.
  12. JunDebtDebt / equity rose above 1.0x (1.16x).
  13. MayPriceRegained the 2022-11 peak, 2 months after the low.
  14. MarPriceFell 28% from the Nov 2022 peak to the Mar 2023 low.
  15. MarPeer rankMoved into the top quartile of Non-Energy Minerals on ROCE (from the 2nd quartile).
  16. FebDebtDebt / equity halved over 12 months to 0.91x.
  17. JanPeer rankSlipped to the 2nd quartile of Non-Energy Minerals on ROCE (from the top quartile).
  18. OctPriceRegained the 2022-04 peak, 5 months after the low.
  19. JulDebtDebt / equity halved over 12 months to 0.91x.
  20. JunResultsRevenue (TTM) reached a new high of ₹175 cr.
  21. JunPeer rankMoved into the top quartile of Non-Energy Minerals on ROCE (from the 3rd quartile).
  22. JunDebtDebt / equity fell below 1.0x (0.91x).

Events are generated from the data by fixed rules.
The month shown is when the change became visible in the reported figures, assuming a 60-day lag after each quarter end; it is not an announcement date.

Where price and fundamentals disagree, market-wide Rewind the whole market to any month

Monthly history90 months · 2019-06 to 2026-11
MonthP/ERevenue (TTM)ROEROCEDebt / Equity
2026-11286.3x₹306 cr1.2%2.0%1.5x
2026-10300.5x₹306 cr1.2%2.0%1.5x
2026-09331.6x₹306 cr1.2%2.0%1.5x
2026-08—₹283 cr-1.2%2.0%1.5x
2026-07—₹283 cr-1.2%2.0%1.5x
2026-06—₹283 cr-1.2%2.0%1.5x
2026-05—₹261 cr-1.1%7.0%1.4x
2026-04—₹261 cr-1.1%7.0%1.4x
2026-03—₹261 cr-1.1%7.0%1.4x
2026-02—₹245 cr-0.9%7.0%1.4x
2026-01—₹245 cr-0.9%7.0%1.4x
2025-12—₹245 cr-0.9%7.0%1.4x
2025-11456.7x₹229 cr1.4%7.0%1.4x
2025-10365.4x₹229 cr1.4%7.0%1.4x
2025-09403.0x₹229 cr1.4%7.0%1.4x
2025-0880.8x₹225 cr6.9%7.0%1.4x
2025-0785.8x₹225 cr6.9%7.0%1.4x
2025-0694.0x₹225 cr6.9%7.0%1.4x
2025-0554.1x₹228 cr2.3%24.0%1.4x
2025-0453.6x₹228 cr2.3%24.0%1.4x
2025-0351.1x₹228 cr2.3%24.0%1.4x
2025-0238.4x₹233 cr3.9%24.0%1.4x
2025-0150.6x₹233 cr3.9%24.0%1.4x
2024-1263.2x₹233 cr3.9%24.0%1.4x
2024-1154.1x₹240 cr5.4%24.0%1.4x
2024-1063.4x₹240 cr5.4%24.0%1.4x
2024-0958.4x₹240 cr5.4%24.0%1.4x
2024-0854.8x₹243 cr5.9%24.0%1.4x
2024-0761.0x₹243 cr5.9%24.0%1.4x
2024-0652.1x₹243 cr5.9%24.0%1.4x
2024-0553.5x₹200 cr8.0%36.0%1.2x
2024-0458.5x₹200 cr8.0%36.0%1.2x
2024-0347.0x₹200 cr8.0%36.0%1.2x
2024-0254.5x₹200 cr8.0%36.0%1.2x
2024-0141.5x₹200 cr8.0%36.0%1.2x
2023-1238.3x₹200 cr8.0%36.0%1.2x
2023-1136.6x₹200 cr8.0%36.0%1.2x
2023-1037.5x₹200 cr8.0%36.0%1.2x
2023-0938.9x₹200 cr8.0%36.0%1.2x
2023-0840.7x₹200 cr8.0%36.0%1.2x
2023-0736.5x₹200 cr8.0%36.0%1.2x
2023-0638.3x₹200 cr8.0%36.0%1.2x
2023-0569.9x₹175 cr6.8%24.0%0.9x
2023-0458.1x₹175 cr6.8%24.0%0.9x
2023-0356.0x₹175 cr6.8%24.0%0.9x
2023-0261.6x₹175 cr6.8%24.0%0.9x
2023-0159.1x₹175 cr6.8%24.0%0.9x
2022-1263.2x₹175 cr6.8%24.0%0.9x
2022-1171.5x₹175 cr6.8%24.0%0.9x
2022-1063.3x₹175 cr6.8%24.0%0.9x
2022-0956.1x₹175 cr6.8%24.0%0.9x
2022-0849.2x₹175 cr6.8%24.0%0.9x
2022-0752.3x₹175 cr6.8%24.0%0.9x
2022-0648.5x₹175 cr6.8%24.0%0.9x
2022-05341.8x₹103 cr3.8%8.0%1.9x
2022-04388.1x₹103 cr3.8%8.0%1.9x
2022-03269.4x₹103 cr3.8%8.0%1.9x
2022-02211.8x₹103 cr3.8%8.0%1.9x
2022-01226.4x₹103 cr3.8%8.0%1.9x
2021-12173.5x₹103 cr3.8%8.0%1.9x
2021-11121.6x₹103 cr3.8%8.0%1.9x
2021-1088.2x₹103 cr3.8%8.0%1.9x
2021-0965.3x₹103 cr3.8%8.0%1.9x
2021-0863.4x₹103 cr3.8%8.0%1.9x
2021-0766.2x₹103 cr3.8%8.0%1.9x
2021-0658.5x₹103 cr3.8%8.0%1.9x
2021-0553.5x₹119 cr4.0%7.0%1.8x
2021-0448.8x₹119 cr4.0%7.0%1.8x
2021-0364.8x₹119 cr4.0%7.0%1.8x
2021-0282.9x₹119 cr4.0%7.0%1.8x
2021-0157.9x₹119 cr4.0%7.0%1.8x
2020-1269.3x₹119 cr4.0%7.0%1.8x
2020-1152.9x₹119 cr4.0%7.0%1.8x
2020-1043.1x₹119 cr4.0%7.0%1.8x
2020-0932.6x₹119 cr4.0%7.0%1.8x
2020-0827.1x₹119 cr4.0%7.0%1.8x
2020-0724.4x₹119 cr4.0%7.0%1.8x
2020-0617.4x₹119 cr4.0%7.0%1.8x
2020-05—₹100 cr-2.6%—1.9x
2020-04—₹100 cr-2.6%—1.9x
2020-03—₹100 cr-2.6%—1.9x
2020-02—₹100 cr-2.6%—1.9x
2020-01—₹100 cr-2.6%—1.9x
2019-12—₹100 cr-2.6%—1.9x
2019-11—₹100 cr-2.6%—1.9x
2019-10—₹100 cr-2.6%—1.9x
2019-09—₹100 cr-2.6%—1.9x
2019-08—₹100 cr-2.6%—1.9x
2019-07—₹100 cr-2.6%—1.9x
2019-06—₹100 cr-2.6%—1.9x

Methodology and data notes

Methodology

Methodology and data notes

All figures come from public exchange prices and screener.in financial statements. Quarterly and annual results are shown from 60 days after the period end, so a month never uses a result before it would plausibly have been published. Statements are the latest versions, which may include later restatements.

Sector medians, percentiles and indices use today's listed companies in the sector (survivorship bias). Prices are adjusted for splits and bonus issues; around a corporate action the fundamentals may lag the price by up to a month, and affected sections are hidden.

The return decomposition uses price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count. The reverse DCF uses a fixed 12% cost of equity, a 10-year horizon and a 15x terminal P/E, and is an illustration only. Events, flags and twins follow fixed rules and thresholds described next to each section.

Feedback