अApnaFunda

CAREER POINT EDUTECH LIMITED (CPEDU)

Consumer Services · Other Consumer Services · figures to Nov '26

Quality scoreHow the business itself ranks against its sector peers on profitability, 3-year growth and leverage. 50 is the middle of the sector.100 / 100
Profitability 99Balance sheet 100

Passes these screensQuality CompounderDebt-light & profitable

Share price

Closing priceAdjusted for splits and bonus issues.

₹185.89 latest close · −8.2% over the last 90 sessions

₹160₹180₹200Jul 3Jul 29Aug 24Sep 17Oct 14Nov 9 ₹160₹180₹200Jul 3Sep 4Nov 9

₹185.89 month-end · −33.4% over 12 months

₹150₹200₹250Nov '25Jan '26Apr '26Jun '26Sep '26Nov '26 ₹150₹200₹250Nov '25May '26Nov '26

₹185.89 month-end · −29.4% since Sep '25

₹200₹300Sep '25Dec '25Mar '26May '26Aug '26Nov '26 ₹200₹300Sep '25Apr '26Nov '26

52-week range ₹141.00 to ₹334.45 · 1-year volatility 46.6%

How rough has the ride been?

Maximum drawdown-57.0%not yet recovered
1-year volatility46.6%annualised

Drawdown from peak

0%−20%−40%2026−54.1% 0%−20%−40%2026−54.1%
Largest drawdowns

-57.0% (2025-10 peak to 2026-03 low, not yet recovered)

Where does it rank among Consumer Services peers?

Each cell is the company's percentile rank among its Consumer Services peers (non-financial companies) that month.
Darker is better-ranked.
Rows marked ↓ are inverted (lower debt, shorter cash cycle and a lower P/E rank higher).

Where it ranks today

  • ROCE98th▲ 3 pts vs a year ago
  • Op. margin100thflat vs a year ago
  • Revenue growth21st
  • EPS growth15th
  • Debt/equity ↓97thflat vs a year ago
  • Cash cycle ↓49th▲ 21 pts vs a year ago
  • P/E ↓67th▼ 33 pts vs a year ago
  • 12M momentum31st

Rank history

ROCE
Op. margin
Revenue growth
EPS growth
Debt/equity ↓
Cash cycle ↓
P/E ↓
12M momentum
Dec '21Jul '22Jan '23Jul '23Jan '24Jul '24Jan '25Jul '25Jan '26Jul '26Nov '26
Lower rank Higher rank Not enough data

Percentiles use today's listed companies in the sector and need at least 5 peers with a value; grey cells have too few.
ROE is computed from net profit and book value where the source does not report it.

The Consumer Services sector page Watch it move against Consumer Services in the Observatory

What is the price implying?

~11%annual earnings growth implied by the price

At a P/E of 14.2x, the price would imply about 11.4%/yr earnings growth for 10 years under the same assumptions, but it is not ranked.

Fewer than six years of annual earnings are available, which is too little to measure delivered growth.

“Implied growth” is what the current price would require under our stated assumptions, not what we expect.

What prices imply across Consumer Services The market-wide Expectations lists

Key figures

Share Priceclose 9 Nov
₹185.89
P/E
14.2x
ROCE
47.0%
Market Cap
₹339 cr
Revenue (TTM)
₹51 cr
P/S
6.6x
P/B
4.5x
ROE
31.8%
Operating Margin
64.1%
Debt / Equity
0.0x
Promoter Holding
63.7%
12M Momentum
-33.4%

52-week range

₹141.00₹334.45
23% of the way from its 52-week low to its high

Price risk

1Y volatility
46.6%
Beta vs sector
1-year daily
1.06

Balance sheet & cash

Debt service
no meaningful debt
Cash from profit, 3Y
operating cash flow ÷ net profit
0.59x
Share count, 1Y
unchanged

Are profits backed by cash?

3 of 5checks within range2 near a threshold
Other income reliance21%Near threshold

Other income as a share of pre-tax profit (trailing twelve months): 21.1%. Bands: below 15%, 15% to 35%, above 35%.

Tax rate25%Within range

Median quarterly effective tax rate over about 2.5 years: 25.0%. Bands: 15% to 35%, 5% to 15% or 35% to 50%, outside 5% to 50%.

Cash conversion0.59xNear threshold

Operating cash flow divided by net profit over the last three fiscal years: 0.59x (cash from operations ₹34 cr, net profit ₹58 cr). Bands: 0.8x and above, 0.5x to 0.8x, below 0.5x.

Free cash flow3 of 3 yrsWithin range

Fiscal years with positive free cash flow in the last 3: 3. Bands: at least 80% of years, 40% to 80%, below 40%.

Receivable days vs history—Not enough data

Not enough reported data to compute this.

Capital work in progress0% of fixed assetsWithin range

Capital work-in-progress is 0% of fixed assets. Bands: not rising or up to 30%; rising for three years and above 30%; rising and above 60%.

Payable days—Not enough data

Not enough reported data to compute this.

Tap a check to see how it is measured

How to read this

Each check is a named rule with fixed thresholds, not a score. Annual statements are the latest restated figures, so a past year may differ from what was originally reported.

All terms explained in the glossary →

Who has been buying and selling?

  • Since Jun 2025, DIIs added 2.5 pts.

Holdings, Jun '26

How each group changed

GroupJun '25Jun '26Change
Promoters63.7%63.7%0.0 pts
FIIs0.2%0.1%-0.1 pts
DIIs0.0%2.5%+2.5 pts
Public and others36.1%33.7%-2.4 pts

Number of shareholders

11,205shareholders-1% since Jun '25
11k11k11k12k Jun '25Sep '25Mar '26Jun '26
Jun '25: 11,269
Sep '25: 10,988
Mar '26: 11,506
Jun '26: 11,205
11k11k11k12k Jun '25Sep '25Mar '26Jun '26
Jun '25: 11,269
Sep '25: 10,988
Mar '26: 11,506
Jun '26: 11,205

Quarterly shareholding as reported, labelled by the quarter it covers (it becomes visible about two months later).
Shareholder counts are only available for recent quarters.

This quarter's smart-money board

What happened next to similar setups

+7.0%typical 12-month return vs the marketAbove the base rate
  • We found 50 past situations where a non-financial company looked like CAREER POINT EDUTECH LIMITED today on valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, price momentum, size and volatility.
  • Over the following 12 months the middle half of them returned −15% to +45% vs the market, against −2% for all non-financial companies in the same months.
  • The analogs' median sat above that base rate (gap +8.7%, 80% range +2.8% to +19.0%), but the matches cluster in only 6 distinct 12-month windows.

Where the 50 outcomes landed

−100%−50%0%+50%+100%
NURECA · Jun 2022: −69.1% vs market
PULZ · Jan 2025: −64.4% vs market
DENORA · May 2024: −47.6% vs market
TARSONS · Jun 2023: −43.4% vs market
NUCLEUS · Jul 2025: −39.7% vs market
TRF · Apr 2025: −36.4% vs market
ANDHRAPAP · Jun 2020: −36.4% vs market
BALAMINES · Jan 2024: −34.8% vs market
CARERATING · Feb 2020: −28.3% vs market
APOLSINHOT · Feb 2020: −24.7% vs market
WEALTH · Oct 2025: −23.6% vs market
GOLDIAM · Jun 2023: −15.6% vs market
TVTODAY · Jan 2020: −15.4% vs market
CHEMCON · May 2022: −14.4% vs market
SWARAJENG · Feb 2021: −13.3% vs market
BAJAJCON · Aug 2020: −10.2% vs market
REPL · May 2022: −8.3% vs market
THYROCARE · May 2023: −5.7% vs market
RITES · Oct 2023: −4.4% vs market
SASKEN · Feb 2022: −2.3% vs market
SUPRIYA · May 2023: +3.0% vs market
CYBERTECH · Oct 2022: +3.0% vs market
SYSTANGO · Jan 2025: +5.1% vs market
QUICKHEAL · Jan 2020: +5.5% vs market
INDOBORAX · Mar 2023: +6.3% vs market
FROG · Oct 2023: +7.8% vs market
BPL · May 2023: +10.3% vs market
BALAXI · Jul 2022: +14.9% vs market
INTENTECH · Dec 2022: +16.7% vs market
IPL · Feb 2023: +19.4% vs market
PRIMESECU · Sep 2021: +21.5% vs market
EXPLEOSOL · Jan 2020: +22.3% vs market
NOCIL · Jan 2020: +26.5% vs market
ECLERX · Jan 2020: +31.3% vs market
KRONOX · Oct 2025: +32.7% vs market
PROPEQUITY · Jun 2023: +37.0% vs market
MOLDTECH · Oct 2021: +44.3% vs market
HINDOILEXP · Nov 2020: +44.8% vs market
SIL · Sep 2021: +50.8% vs market
CUPID · Aug 2022: +51.6% vs market
GANDHITUBE · Jul 2022: +55.5% vs market
LIKHITHA · Jun 2022: +58.9% vs market
FCL · May 2025: +64.0% vs market
MONARCH · Sep 2023: +65.5% vs market
GLOBAL · Apr 2025: +68.6% vs market
MPSLTD · Feb 2024: +71.7% vs market
TRITURBINE · Dec 2020: +72.8% vs market
MAYURUNIQ · Apr 2020: +79.7% vs market
STEELCAS · Jul 2024: +88.3% vs market
BEPL · Jul 2020: +179.4% vs market
Similar setups +7.0%All companies −1.7%← worse than the marketbetter than the market →

Each dot is one past situation (hover or tap for details) · Solid dots are the closest matches, listed below · Shaded is the middle half of all companies in the same months · 1 beyond the range shown, drawn at the edge

Similar setups' median
+7.0%
All companies' median
−1.7%
Beat the market
60% vs 48%

50 past situations · 50 companies · 33 months · 2020–2025

The closest matches

CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
CARERATING
Commercial Services
Feb 2020 10x35% −50%−53% −28%
TRF
Producer Manufacturing
Apr 2025 15x38% −35%−41% −36%
SIL
Process Industries
Sep 2021 30x40% +53%−30% +51%
DENORA
Electronic Technology
May 2024 39x30% −9%−33% −48%
EXPLEOSOL
Technology Services
Jan 2020 8x40% −32%−38% +22%
Show the other 3 matches
CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
CUPID
Consumer Non-Durables
Aug 2022 10x— −2%−36% +52%
WEALTH
Finance
Oct 2025 33x38% −27%−34% −24%
SYSTANGO
Technology Services
Jan 2025 21x28% −27%−35% +5%
How reliable is this?

Matched on P/E, P/S, ROCE, operating margin, debt/equity, revenue growth, 12-month momentum, drawdown from 12-month high, size and volatility. Closest on: drawdown from 12-month high, 12-month momentum and P/E. Not used (unavailable for this company): interest cover. One match per company and at most 7 from any one month.

Independent periods: the matches fall in 6 distinct 12-month windows. Matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, so fewer windows means less evidence.

How this is built

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to CAREER POINT EDUTECH LIMITED. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

Methodology

How historical analogs are built

Data as of 2026-11-09. Outcome pool: Jan 2020 to Oct 2025.

For every company we look at the situation it is in today (valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, 12-month price momentum, drawdown, size and volatility) and find past company-months that looked most like it. We then show what happened to those past situations over the following 12 months, measured against the ApnaFunda All index and against the base rate. It describes history. It does not predict anything.

What is compared

FeatureWeightNon-financialFinancial
P/E1yesyes
P/S1yes—
P/B1—yes
ROCE1yes—
operating margin1yes—
ROE1—yes
debt/equity0.75yes—
interest cover0.5yes—
revenue growth0.75yesyes
12-month momentum1yesyes
drawdown from 12-month high0.75yesyes
size0.75yesyes
volatility0.5yesyes

Weights were set by judgement before any outcome was looked at and are never tuned on results. Loss-making companies (negative P/E or net profit) are only matched with other loss-making companies. Banks, NBFCs and insurers are compared only with each other and use a different feature set. Every feature is converted, month by month, to its rank among companies in the same pool in that month, so a P/E of 30 in a hot market and a P/E of 22 in a cold one can match if both were equally expensive for their time. Only that month's data is used.

How closeness and the sample are defined

Distance is the weighted root-mean-square gap between the standardised features both companies have. A match needs at least 70% of the query's feature weight, a distance of at most 0.9, and 30 matches at minimum to be shown. We keep up to 50 matches with these exclusions: never the company itself, one match per company (its closest month), and at most 7 from any one calendar month so a single market episode cannot dominate.

Base rate

The base rate is the distribution of 12-month returns, relative to the market, of every eligible company-month in the same pool, with each month weighted to match the months the analogs came from. It answers: how did a random company do in these same months? Because matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, we also report the number of distinct 12-month windows behind a result, and a bootstrap that resamples months decides whether the analog median differs from the base rate at all. "Not meaningfully different" is the usual outcome and the page copy is written for it.

Limits you should know

  • One market period. The outcome pool covers 2020–2025 only (70 months), including the 2020 crash and the 2020–21 rally.
  • Survivorship. Only companies listed today are included. Delisted and bankrupt companies are missing, which flatters past outcomes, particularly for distressed-looking setups.
  • Price return only. Dividends are excluded, and the benchmark is an ApnaFunda market-cap-weighted index of the same listed companies, not an official index.
  • Reporting lag. Fundamentals are matched on an assumed 60-day lag after the quarter end, not on real announcement dates.
  • Pools: non-financial: 98,395 company-months from 2019 companies; financial: 5,659 company-months from 108 companies. 2349 companies currently have a result; the rest are suppressed because too few comparable situations exist.

Does it work? A walk-forward check

The walk-forward check has not been run for this build, so skill is shown as not yet measured.

Disclaimer

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to any company shown. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

What changed?

2 events since Mar '26

  1. JunDividendStarted paying a dividend (payout 20% of profit).
  2. MarPriceFell 57% from the Oct 2025 peak to the Mar 2026 low.

Events are generated from the data by fixed rules.
The month shown is when the change became visible in the reported figures, assuming a 60-day lag after each quarter end; it is not an announcement date.

Where price and fundamentals disagree, market-wide Rewind the whole market to any month

Monthly history15 months · 2025-09 to 2026-11
MonthP/ERevenue (TTM)ROEROCEDebt / Equity
2026-1114.2x₹51 cr31.8%47.0%0.0x
2026-1012.1x₹51 cr31.8%47.0%0.0x
2026-0913.5x₹51 cr31.8%47.0%0.0x
2026-0814.4x₹51 cr30.6%47.0%0.0x
2026-0716.6x₹51 cr30.6%47.0%0.0x
2026-0616.2x₹51 cr30.6%47.0%0.0x
2026-052.5x₹52 cr37.2%48.0%0.0x
2026-043.0x₹52 cr37.2%48.0%0.0x
2026-032.0x₹52 cr37.2%48.0%0.0x
2026-021.2x₹51 cr38.4%48.0%0.0x
2026-011.3x₹51 cr38.4%48.0%0.0x
2025-121.6x₹51 cr38.4%48.0%0.0x
2025-111.2x₹51 cr36.8%48.0%0.0x
2025-101.4x₹51 cr36.8%48.0%0.0x
2025-091.2x₹51 cr36.8%48.0%0.0x

Methodology and data notes

Methodology

Methodology and data notes

All figures come from public exchange prices and screener.in financial statements. Quarterly and annual results are shown from 60 days after the period end, so a month never uses a result before it would plausibly have been published. Statements are the latest versions, which may include later restatements.

Sector medians, percentiles and indices use today's listed companies in the sector (survivorship bias). Prices are adjusted for splits and bonus issues; around a corporate action the fundamentals may lag the price by up to a month, and affected sections are hidden.

The return decomposition uses price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count. The reverse DCF uses a fixed 12% cost of equity, a 10-year horizon and a 15x terminal P/E, and is an illustration only. Events, flags and twins follow fixed rules and thresholds described next to each section.

Feedback