अApnaFunda

LIKHITHA INFRASTRUCTURE LTD (LIKHITHA)

Industrial Services · Engineering & Construction · figures to Nov '26

Quality scoreHow the business itself ranks against its sector peers on profitability, 3-year growth and leverage. 50 is the middle of the sector.59 / 100
Profitability 46Growth 33Balance sheet 100
Momentum scoreHow strong the recent trend is: 3-month price change, 12-month improvement in earnings and the rise in FII + DII holding, among companies above ₹500 cr.27 / 100
Price 43Earnings 11

Share price

Closing priceAdjusted for splits and bonus issues.

₹206.87 latest close · −21.1% over the last 90 sessions

₹200₹220₹240₹260Jul 3Jul 29Aug 24Sep 17Oct 14Nov 9 ₹200₹220₹240₹260Jul 3Sep 4Nov 9

₹206.87 month-end · +7.0% over 12 months

₹150₹200₹250Nov '25Jan '26Apr '26Jun '26Sep '26Nov '26 ₹150₹200₹250Nov '25May '26Nov '26

₹206.87 month-end · −27.4% over 3 years

₹200₹300₹400Nov '23Jun '24Jan '25Sep '25Apr '26Nov '26 ₹200₹300₹400Nov '23May '25Nov '26

₹206.87 month-end · +1.8% since Jun '21

₹200₹300₹400Jun '21Jul '22Aug '23Sep '24Oct '25Nov '26 ₹200₹300₹400Jun '21Mar '24Nov '26

52-week range ₹131.45 to ₹272.00 · 1-year volatility 52.0%

Was the rally earned?

+7%share price, 1 yearMultiple-driven

Partly.

  • Most of the rise came from investors paying a higher multiple (P/E 11.6x to 25.0x); per-share earnings took off 73 points.
  • The share count barely moved.
Net profit growth: −73 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).−73 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: +80 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+80 ptsP/E changeShare count change: 0 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.0 ptsShare count changeShare price: +7%+7%Share priceNet profit growth: −73 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).−73ProfitP/E change: +80 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+80P/EShare count change: 0 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.0SharesShare price: +7%+7%Share price
Net profit growth-73 ptsNet profit fell about 51%, which lowers the price.
P/E change+80 ptsThe P/E rose from 11.6x to 25.0x, which lifts the price.
Share count change0 ptsShare count was little changed. More shares would count against the price.
-27%share price, 3 yearsEarnings-driven

Mostly earnings.

  • Per-share earnings took off 51 points, while the multiple moved less (P/E 18.9x to 25.0x).
  • The share count barely moved.
Net profit growth: −52 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).−52 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: +24 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+24 ptsP/E changeShare count change: +1 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.+1 ptsShare count changeShare price: −27%−27%Share priceNet profit growth: −52 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).−52ProfitP/E change: +24 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+24P/EShare count change: +1 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.+1SharesShare price: −27%−27%Share price
Net profit growth-52 ptsNet profit fell about 46%, which lowers the price.
P/E change+24 ptsThe P/E rose from 18.9x to 25.0x, which lifts the price.
Share count change+1 ptsShare count was little changed. More shares would count against the price.
+29%share price, 5 yearsEarnings and multiple

Both mattered.

  • Per-share earnings added 14 points and the multiple added 16 points (P/E 21.8x to 25.0x).
  • The share count barely moved.
Net profit growth: +13 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+13 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: +16 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+16 ptsP/E changeShare count change: 0 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.0 ptsShare count changeShare price: +29%+29%Share priceNet profit growth: +13 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+13ProfitP/E change: +16 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+16P/EShare count change: 0 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.0SharesShare price: +29%+29%Share price
Net profit growth+13 ptsNet profit rose about 12%, which lifts the price.
P/E change+16 ptsThe P/E rose from 21.8x to 25.0x, which lifts the price.
Share count change0 ptsShare count was little changed. More shares would count against the price.
What do "pts" mean?

"pts" are percentage points of the share price return. The parts add up to the total shown for each period. Because price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count, higher profit pushes the price up, a higher P/E pushes it up, and more shares push it down.

Example: if the price rose 34% and profit growth accounts for +58 pts while a lower P/E accounts for -24 pts, then 58 - 24 = 34. The +58 is not the profit growth rate itself: it is the part of the price move that profit growth explains.

Net profit is trailing twelve months as reported with a 60-day lag.

Compare this with LARSEN AND TOUBRO

How rough has the ride been?

Maximum drawdown-72.3%not yet recovered
1-year volatility52.0%annualised
Beta vs sector index0.783-year daily, correlation 0.38
Volume spikes3last 90 sessions, 5x the 50-day median

Drawdown from peak

0%−20%−40%−60%202120222023202420252026−70.5% 0%−20%−40%−60%20232025−70.5%
Largest drawdowns

-72.3% (2024-06 peak to 2026-03 low, not yet recovered)

-54.1% (2020-10 peak to 2020-11 low, recovered 2021-03)

-47.9% (2021-06 peak to 2022-06 low, recovered 2022-11)

Most recent volume spikes

2026-09-30: 7x the 50-day median, price +5.1% that day

2026-09-16: 10x the 50-day median, price +2.3% that day

2026-09-09: 31x the 50-day median, price +8.8% that day

Beta is the slope of daily returns against a market-cap-weighted index of the sector's other listed companies, built from today's constituents (so it excludes companies no longer listed).

Is it expensive against its own past and its peers?

25.0xP/E todayNear its historic high
Against its own history86th percentile
CheapestMedian 19.7xDearest

Usual range 13.1x to 26.1x since 2021-06.

Against Industrial Services25.0x vs 14.0x
This company
25.0x
Sector median
14.0x

78% above the Industrial Services median.

9.8x18.2x26.5x34.9xJun '21Jul '22Aug '23Sep '24Oct '25Nov '269.8x18.2x26.5x34.9xJun '21Apr '23Feb '25Nov '26
P/E (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianIndustrial Services median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/B (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianIndustrial Services median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/S (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianIndustrial Services median
How to read this

Shaded band: 10th to 90th percentile of the company's own P/E history; dotted line: its median; orange line: sector median (companies with a positive multiple, at least 5 in the sector).

Sector figures are built from today's listed companies, so they exclude companies that are no longer listed.

All terms explained in the glossary →

How Industrial Services is valued

Where does it rank among Industrial Services peers?

Each cell is the company's percentile rank among its Industrial Services peers (non-financial companies) that month.
Darker is better-ranked.
Rows marked ↓ are inverted (lower debt, shorter cash cycle and a lower P/E rank higher).

Where it ranks today

  • ROCE43rd▼ 40 pts vs a year ago
  • Op. margin49th▼ 8 pts vs a year ago
  • Revenue growth13th▼ 36 pts vs a year ago
  • EPS growth22nd▼ 29 pts vs a year ago
  • Debt/equity ↓98th▲ 5 pts vs a year ago
  • Cash cycle ↓4thflat vs a year ago
  • P/E ↓26th▼ 49 pts vs a year ago
  • 12M momentum79th▲ 61 pts vs a year ago

Rank history

ROCE
Op. margin
Revenue growth
EPS growth
Debt/equity ↓
Cash cycle ↓
P/E ↓
12M momentum
Dec '21Jul '22Jan '23Jul '23Jan '24Jul '24Jan '25Jul '25Jan '26Jul '26Nov '26
Lower rank Higher rank Not enough data

Percentiles use today's listed companies in the sector and need at least 5 peers with a value; grey cells have too few.
ROE is computed from net profit and book value where the source does not report it.

The Industrial Services sector page Watch it move against Industrial Services in the Observatory

What is the price implying?

~11%annual earnings growth implied by the price

At a P/E of 14.4x, the price would imply about 10.8%/yr earnings growth for 10 years under the same assumptions, but it is not ranked.

Below the ₹1,000 cr market-cap floor used for the lists.

“Implied growth” is what the current price would require under our stated assumptions, not what we expect.

What prices imply across Industrial Services The market-wide Expectations lists

Key figures

Share Priceclose 9 Nov
₹206.87
P/E
25.0x
ROCE
14.0%
Market Cap
₹814 cr
Revenue (TTM)
₹419 cr
P/S
1.9x
P/B
2.0x
ROE
7.9%
Operating Margin
12.9%
Debt / Equity
0.0x
Promoter Holding
70.3%
12M Momentum
7.0%

52-week range

₹131.45₹272.00
54% of the way from its 52-week low to its high

Price risk

1Y volatility
52.0%
Beta vs sector
1-year daily
0.76

Balance sheet & cash

Interest cover
operating profit ÷ interest
37.4x
Cash from profit, 3Y
operating cash flow ÷ net profit
0.10x
low
Share count, 1Y
unchanged

Are profits backed by cash?

5 of 7checks within range1 beyond a threshold
Other income reliance10%Within range

Other income as a share of pre-tax profit (trailing twelve months): 9.9%. Bands: below 15%, 15% to 35%, above 35%.

Tax rate26%Within range

Median quarterly effective tax rate over about 2.5 years: 26.0%. Bands: 15% to 35%, 5% to 15% or 35% to 50%, outside 5% to 50%.

Cash conversion0.10xBeyond threshold

Operating cash flow divided by net profit over the last three fiscal years: 0.10x (cash from operations ₹18 cr, net profit ₹173 cr). Bands: 0.8x and above, 0.5x to 0.8x, below 0.5x.

Free cash flow2 of 5 yrsNear threshold

Fiscal years with positive free cash flow in the last 5: 2. Bands: at least 80% of years, 40% to 80%, below 40%.

Receivable days vs history+14 daysWithin range

Debtor days are above the median of the previous three fiscal years by 14 days (81 vs 67). Bands: under 15 days, 15 to 45, over 45.

Capital work in progress0% of fixed assetsWithin range

Capital work-in-progress is 0% of fixed assets. Bands: not rising or up to 30%; rising for three years and above 30%; rising and above 60%.

Payable days-40 days / 2 yrsWithin range

Days payable changed by -40 over two years. Bands: rise of up to 30 days; more than 30 days.

Tap a check to see how it is measured

How to read this

Each check is a named rule with fixed thresholds, not a score. Annual statements are the latest restated figures, so a past year may differ from what was originally reported.

All terms explained in the glossary →

Who has been buying and selling?

  • Over 3 years, FIIs trimmed 0.6 pts.
  • The number of shareholders rose from 41,371 to 49,860 (+21%) between Sep 2023 and Jun 2026.

Holdings, Jun '26

How each group changed

GroupSep '23Jun '26Change
Promoters70.0%70.3%+0.2 pts
FIIs0.7%0.1%-0.6 pts
DIIs———
Public and others29.3%29.6%+0.3 pts

Number of shareholders

49,860shareholders+21% since Sep '23
41k48k54k60k Sep '23Mar '24Sep '24Mar '25Dec '25Jun '26
Sep '23: 41,371
Dec '23: 45,132
Mar '24: 50,505
Jun '24: 57,920
Sep '24: 59,494
Dec '24: 59,925
Mar '25: 59,274
Jun '25: 58,977
Dec '25: 54,958
Mar '26: 52,883
Jun '26: 49,860
41k48k54k60k Sep '23Sep '24Dec '25Jun '26
Sep '23: 41,371
Dec '23: 45,132
Mar '24: 50,505
Jun '24: 57,920
Sep '24: 59,494
Dec '24: 59,925
Mar '25: 59,274
Jun '25: 58,977
Dec '25: 54,958
Mar '26: 52,883
Jun '26: 49,860

Quarterly shareholding as reported, labelled by the quarter it covers (it becomes visible about two months later).
Shareholder counts are only available for recent quarters.

This quarter's smart-money board

What happened next to similar setups

−4.2%typical 12-month return vs the marketNot meaningfully different from the base rate
  • We found 50 past situations where a non-financial company looked like LIKHITHA INFRASTRUCTURE LTD today on valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, price momentum, size and volatility.
  • Over the following 12 months the middle half of them returned −31% to +48% vs the market, against −4% for all non-financial companies in the same months.
  • The gap against the base rate (−0.7%, 80% range −18.8% to +5.7%) is within what chance and overlapping periods produce.

Where the 50 outcomes landed

−100%−50%0%+50%+100%
AIRAN · Jun 2025: −48.6% vs market
FIBERWEB · Aug 2025: −44.1% vs market
PODDARMENT · Jul 2021: −40.1% vs market
KITEX · Apr 2022: −37.8% vs market
INDNIPPON · Sep 2020: −37.6% vs market
MUNJALSHOW · Aug 2020: −36.3% vs market
FOCUS · Aug 2025: −35.7% vs market
HINDCON · Aug 2024: −35.1% vs market
IFBAGRO · Mar 2022: −34.0% vs market
ALPHAGEO · Sep 2021: −33.2% vs market
EIMCOELECO · Jun 2025: −31.9% vs market
BHARATRAS · Jan 2025: −31.4% vs market
UNITEDTEA · Jun 2022: −30.7% vs market
MAZDA · Jul 2025: −29.6% vs market
DENTALKART · May 2025: −29.6% vs market
SRHHYPOLTD · Jul 2025: −29.3% vs market
SHYAMCENT · Dec 2022: −26.4% vs market
CONTROLPR · Jan 2020: −24.9% vs market
ADOR · Aug 2023: −24.7% vs market
INTENTECH · Feb 2024: −23.7% vs market
IPL · May 2025: −22.8% vs market
HONDAPOWER · May 2025: −17.8% vs market
IVC · Oct 2022: −9.6% vs market
XCHANGING · Jan 2024: −9.3% vs market
SASKEN · Jul 2024: −6.0% vs market
ALPA · Dec 2023: −2.5% vs market
QUICKHEAL · Nov 2020: −1.8% vs market
NIITLTD · Jul 2024: −0.4% vs market
BEPL · Jun 2023: +1.0% vs market
BOROLTD · Mar 2022: +4.2% vs market
AUTOAXLES · May 2021: +12.2% vs market
NOCIL · Dec 2020: +20.0% vs market
APTECHT · May 2020: +21.5% vs market
VINYLINDIA · Jul 2020: +23.8% vs market
CHEMFAB · Jun 2024: +24.0% vs market
PRIMESECU · Mar 2022: +27.7% vs market
VSTTILLERS · Apr 2025: +36.8% vs market
KABRAEXTRU · Feb 2020: +52.3% vs market
SHARDAMOTR · Mar 2021: +54.3% vs market
NUCLEUS · Apr 2023: +55.0% vs market
MOREPENLAB · Sep 2023: +58.7% vs market
GRSE · May 2022: +60.6% vs market
SUPRIYA · Feb 2024: +80.9% vs market
ANUP · Mar 2023: +112.2% vs market
INDOBORAX · Aug 2025: +115.2% vs market
ONMOBILE · Apr 2020: +156.3% vs market
TECHNOE · Jun 2023: +191.3% vs market
BLS · Jun 2021: +197.7% vs market
GOLDIAM · Jan 2021: +206.5% vs market
CUPID · Dec 2022: +220.7% vs market
Similar setups −4.2%All companies −3.5%← worse than the marketbetter than the market →

Each dot is one past situation (hover or tap for details) · Solid dots are the closest matches, listed below · Shaded is the middle half of all companies in the same months · 7 beyond the range shown, drawn at the edge

Similar setups' median
−4.2%
All companies' median
−3.5%
Beat the market
44% vs 46%

50 past situations · 50 companies · 38 months · 2020–2025

The closest matches

CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
MAZDA
Producer Manufacturing
Jul 2025 24x15% +1%−29% −30%
BLS
Technology Services
Jun 2021 27x11% +99%−8% +198%
HINDCON
Process Industries
Aug 2024 44x18% +84%−17% −35%
DENTALKART
Retail Trade
May 2025 51x— +13%−25% −30%
KITEX
Process Industries
Apr 2022 32x11% +166%−12% −38%
Show the other 3 matches
CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
HONDAPOWER
Producer Manufacturing
May 2025 48x15% +9%−33% −18%
VINYLINDIA
Distribution Services
Jul 2020 19x14% +18%−31% +24%
PODDARMENT
Process Industries
Jul 2021 18x14% +131%−4% −40%
How reliable is this?

Matched on P/E, P/S, ROCE, operating margin, debt/equity, interest cover, revenue growth, 12-month momentum, drawdown from 12-month high, size and volatility. Closest on: 12-month momentum, drawdown from 12-month high and size. One match per company and at most 7 from any one month.

Independent periods: the matches fall in 6 distinct 12-month windows. Matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, so fewer windows means less evidence.

How this is built

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to LIKHITHA INFRASTRUCTURE LTD. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

Methodology

How historical analogs are built

Data as of 2026-11-09. Outcome pool: Jan 2020 to Oct 2025.

For every company we look at the situation it is in today (valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, 12-month price momentum, drawdown, size and volatility) and find past company-months that looked most like it. We then show what happened to those past situations over the following 12 months, measured against the ApnaFunda All index and against the base rate. It describes history. It does not predict anything.

What is compared

FeatureWeightNon-financialFinancial
P/E1yesyes
P/S1yes—
P/B1—yes
ROCE1yes—
operating margin1yes—
ROE1—yes
debt/equity0.75yes—
interest cover0.5yes—
revenue growth0.75yesyes
12-month momentum1yesyes
drawdown from 12-month high0.75yesyes
size0.75yesyes
volatility0.5yesyes

Weights were set by judgement before any outcome was looked at and are never tuned on results. Loss-making companies (negative P/E or net profit) are only matched with other loss-making companies. Banks, NBFCs and insurers are compared only with each other and use a different feature set. Every feature is converted, month by month, to its rank among companies in the same pool in that month, so a P/E of 30 in a hot market and a P/E of 22 in a cold one can match if both were equally expensive for their time. Only that month's data is used.

How closeness and the sample are defined

Distance is the weighted root-mean-square gap between the standardised features both companies have. A match needs at least 70% of the query's feature weight, a distance of at most 0.9, and 30 matches at minimum to be shown. We keep up to 50 matches with these exclusions: never the company itself, one match per company (its closest month), and at most 7 from any one calendar month so a single market episode cannot dominate.

Base rate

The base rate is the distribution of 12-month returns, relative to the market, of every eligible company-month in the same pool, with each month weighted to match the months the analogs came from. It answers: how did a random company do in these same months? Because matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, we also report the number of distinct 12-month windows behind a result, and a bootstrap that resamples months decides whether the analog median differs from the base rate at all. "Not meaningfully different" is the usual outcome and the page copy is written for it.

Limits you should know

  • One market period. The outcome pool covers 2020–2025 only (70 months), including the 2020 crash and the 2020–21 rally.
  • Survivorship. Only companies listed today are included. Delisted and bankrupt companies are missing, which flatters past outcomes, particularly for distressed-looking setups.
  • Price return only. Dividends are excluded, and the benchmark is an ApnaFunda market-cap-weighted index of the same listed companies, not an official index.
  • Reporting lag. Fundamentals are matched on an assumed 60-day lag after the quarter end, not on real announcement dates.
  • Pools: non-financial: 98,395 company-months from 2019 companies; financial: 5,659 company-months from 108 companies. 2349 companies currently have a result; the rest are suppressed because too few comparable situations exist.

Does it work? A walk-forward check

The walk-forward check has not been run for this build, so skill is shown as not yet measured.

Disclaimer

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to any company shown. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

What else looks like this?

Companies with the most similar financial profile today, regardless of industry.

Producer Manufacturing
64%similar
revenueoperating margin
Process Industries
64%similar
promoter holdingrevenue
Technology Services
62%similar
ROCEmarket cap
ORIENT BELLORIENTBELL
Producer Manufacturing
60%similar
P/Evolatility
Health Technology
58%similar
promoter holdingP/E
EMSEMSLIMITED
Industrial Services
64%similar
P/EEPS growth
Industrial Services
45%similar
promoter holdingmarket cap
Industrial Services
39%similar
market cappromoter holding

Similarity is statistical, based on reported metrics; it does not imply similar business quality or future returns.

What changed?

30 events since Feb '23

  1. SepPriceVolume reached 31.0x its 50-day median on 2026-09-09; price +8.8% that day.
  2. JunValuationP/E crossed above the 90th percentile of its own history to date (26.7x).
  3. JunPeer rankSlipped to the 3rd quartile of Industrial Services on ROCE (from the top quartile).
  4. JunDividendDividend payout cut from 9% to 0% of profit.
  5. AprPriceVolume reached 36.4x its 50-day median on 2026-04-08; price +15.1% that day.
  6. MarPriceFell 72% from the Jun 2024 peak to the Mar 2026 low.
  7. MarPeer rankSlipped to the 3rd quartile of Industrial Services on operating margin (from the 2nd quartile).
  8. MarPriceVolume reached 49.6x its 50-day median on 2026-03-27; price +10.8% that day.
Show 22 earlier events
  1. DecPeer rankSlipped to the 3rd quartile of Industrial Services on EPS growth (from the 2nd quartile).
  2. DecPriceVolume reached 11.4x its 50-day median on 2025-12-24; price +6.4% that day.
  3. SepResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned negative.
  4. SepPeer rankMoved into the 2nd quartile of Industrial Services on EPS growth (from the 3rd quartile).
  5. SepPriceVolume reached 7.2x its 50-day median on 2025-09-11; price -0.3% that day.
  6. AugValuationP/E fell below the 10th percentile of its own history to date (14.1x).
  7. MayPriceVolume reached 13.3x its 50-day median on 2025-05-29; price +8.6% that day.
  8. MarPriceVolume reached 19.2x its 50-day median on 2025-03-20; price +12.0% that day.
  9. FebValuationP/E fell below the 10th percentile of its own history to date (14.5x).
  10. DecPriceVolume reached 14.2x its 50-day median on 2024-12-05; price +9.7% that day.
  11. SepPeer rankSlipped to the 2nd quartile of Industrial Services on operating margin (from the top quartile).
  12. JunResultsRevenue (TTM) reached a new high of ₹422 cr.
  13. JunPeer rankSlipped to the 3rd quartile of Industrial Services on EPS growth (from the 2nd quartile).
  14. AprPriceRegained the 2023-09 peak, 1 month after the low.
  15. AprPriceVolume reached 26.9x its 50-day median on 2024-04-18; price +10.0% that day.
  16. MarPriceFell 31% from the Sep 2023 peak to the Mar 2024 low.
  17. MarValuationP/E fell below the 10th percentile of its own history to date (15.4x).
  18. FebPriceVolume reached 5.5x its 50-day median on 2024-02-13; price -2.7% that day.
  19. AugPriceVolume reached 8.1x its 50-day median on 2023-08-10; price -10.5% that day.
  20. JunResultsRevenue (TTM) reached a new high of ₹365 cr.
  21. AprPriceVolume reached 11.5x its 50-day median on 2023-04-18; price +10.4% that day.
  22. FebPriceVolume reached 5.3x its 50-day median on 2023-02-15; price +8.5% that day.

Events are generated from the data by fixed rules.
The month shown is when the change became visible in the reported figures, assuming a 60-day lag after each quarter end; it is not an announcement date.

Where price and fundamentals disagree, market-wide Rewind the whole market to any month

Monthly history66 months · 2021-06 to 2026-11
MonthP/ERevenue (TTM)ROEROCEDebt / Equity
2026-1125.0x₹419 cr7.9%14.0%0.0x
2026-1024.6x₹419 cr7.8%14.0%0.0x
2026-0928.3x₹419 cr7.8%14.0%0.0x
2026-0820.9x₹457 cr9.4%14.0%0.0x
2026-0722.2x₹457 cr9.4%14.0%0.0x
2026-0626.7x₹457 cr9.4%14.0%0.0x
2026-0514.2x₹472 cr13.9%28.0%0.0x
2026-0416.1x₹472 cr13.9%28.0%0.0x
2026-0311.8x₹472 cr13.9%28.0%0.0x
2026-029.8x₹485 cr16.1%28.0%0.0x
2026-0110.6x₹485 cr16.1%28.0%0.0x
2025-1212.6x₹485 cr16.1%28.0%0.0x
2025-1111.6x₹516 cr17.7%28.0%0.0x
2025-1014.0x₹516 cr17.7%28.0%0.0x
2025-0913.7x₹516 cr17.7%28.0%0.0x
2025-0814.1x₹519 cr18.6%28.0%0.0x
2025-0715.9x₹519 cr18.6%28.0%0.0x
2025-0616.4x₹519 cr18.6%28.0%0.0x
2025-0516.2x₹506 cr22.4%32.0%0.0x
2025-0414.5x₹506 cr22.4%32.0%0.0x
2025-0315.3x₹506 cr22.4%32.0%0.0x
2025-0214.5x₹481 cr22.0%32.0%0.0x
2025-0118.3x₹481 cr22.0%32.0%0.0x
2024-1220.1x₹481 cr22.0%32.0%0.0x
2024-1121.3x₹457 cr21.4%32.0%0.0x
2024-1021.6x₹457 cr21.4%32.0%0.0x
2024-0922.9x₹457 cr21.4%32.0%0.0x
2024-0826.6x₹422 cr21.0%32.0%0.0x
2024-0726.8x₹422 cr21.0%32.0%0.0x
2024-0627.5x₹422 cr21.0%32.0%0.0x
2024-0522.6x₹365 cr24.0%37.0%0.0x
2024-0423.3x₹365 cr24.0%37.0%0.0x
2024-0315.4x₹365 cr24.0%37.0%0.0x
2024-0217.4x₹365 cr24.0%37.0%0.0x
2024-0117.2x₹365 cr24.0%37.0%0.0x
2023-1218.5x₹365 cr24.0%37.0%0.0x
2023-1118.9x₹365 cr24.0%37.0%0.0x
2023-1019.9x₹365 cr24.0%37.0%0.0x
2023-0922.4x₹365 cr24.0%37.0%0.0x
2023-0820.2x₹365 cr24.0%37.0%0.0x
2023-0719.3x₹365 cr24.0%37.0%0.0x
2023-0617.2x₹365 cr24.0%37.0%0.0x
2023-0523.1x₹257 cr23.8%36.0%0.0x
2023-0424.5x₹257 cr23.8%36.0%0.0x
2023-0320.2x₹257 cr23.8%36.0%0.0x
2023-0219.6x₹257 cr23.8%36.0%0.0x
2023-0119.6x₹257 cr23.8%36.0%0.0x
2022-1219.4x₹257 cr23.8%36.0%0.0x
2022-1120.2x₹257 cr23.8%36.0%0.0x
2022-1016.3x₹257 cr23.8%36.0%0.0x
2022-0916.2x₹257 cr23.8%36.0%0.0x
2022-0814.4x₹257 cr23.8%36.0%0.0x
2022-0712.2x₹257 cr23.8%36.0%0.0x
2022-0611.7x₹257 cr23.8%36.0%0.0x
2022-0519.3x₹191 cr18.8%—0.0x
2022-0420.7x₹191 cr18.8%—0.0x
2022-0319.7x₹191 cr18.8%—0.0x
2022-0220.5x₹191 cr18.8%—0.0x
2022-0123.8x₹191 cr18.8%—0.0x
2021-1223.5x₹191 cr18.8%—0.0x
2021-1121.8x₹191 cr18.8%—0.0x
2021-1024.3x₹191 cr18.8%—0.0x
2021-0925.6x₹191 cr18.8%—0.0x
2021-0825.7x₹191 cr18.8%—0.0x
2021-0726.9x₹191 cr18.8%—0.0x
2021-0627.7x₹191 cr18.8%—0.0x

Methodology and data notes

Methodology

Methodology and data notes

All figures come from public exchange prices and screener.in financial statements. Quarterly and annual results are shown from 60 days after the period end, so a month never uses a result before it would plausibly have been published. Statements are the latest versions, which may include later restatements.

Sector medians, percentiles and indices use today's listed companies in the sector (survivorship bias). Prices are adjusted for splits and bonus issues; around a corporate action the fundamentals may lag the price by up to a month, and affected sections are hidden.

The return decomposition uses price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count. The reverse DCF uses a fixed 12% cost of equity, a 10-year horizon and a 15x terminal P/E, and is an illustration only. Events, flags and twins follow fixed rules and thresholds described next to each section.

Feedback