अApnaFunda

VASA DENTICITY LIMITED (DENTALKART)

Retail Trade · Specialty Stores · figures to Nov '26

Quality scoreHow the business itself ranks against its sector peers on profitability, 3-year growth and leverage. 50 is the middle of the sector.67 / 100
Profitability 34Balance sheet 100
Momentum scoreHow strong the recent trend is: 3-month price change, 12-month improvement in earnings and the rise in FII + DII holding, among companies above ₹500 cr.52 / 100
Price 77Earnings 27

Share price

Closing priceAdjusted for splits and bonus issues.

₹446 latest close · +18.9% over the last 90 sessions

₹400₹450₹500Jul 3Jul 29Aug 24Sep 17Oct 14Nov 9 ₹400₹450₹500Jul 3Sep 4Nov 9

₹446 month-end · −25.9% over 12 months

₹400₹500₹600Nov '25Jan '26Apr '26Jun '26Sep '26Nov '26 ₹400₹500₹600Nov '25May '26Nov '26

₹446 month-end · −25.4% since Jun '24

₹400₹600Jun '24Dec '24Jun '25Nov '25May '26Nov '26 ₹400₹600Jun '24Sep '25Nov '26

52-week range ₹322.50 to ₹612.00 · 1-year volatility 47.7%

Was the rally earned?

-26%share price, 1 yearEarnings-driven

Mostly earnings.

  • Per-share earnings took off 34 points, while the multiple moved less (P/E 60.7x to 66.9x).
  • The share count rose 6%.
Net profit growth: −29 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).−29 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: +8 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+8 ptsP/E changeShare count change: −5 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−5 ptsShare count changeShare price: −26%−26%Share priceNet profit growth: −29 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).−29ProfitP/E change: +8 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+8P/EShare count change: −5 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−5SharesShare price: −26%−26%Share price
Net profit growth-29 ptsNet profit fell about 28%, which lowers the price.
P/E change+8 ptsThe P/E rose from 60.7x to 66.9x, which lifts the price.
Share count change-5 ptsShare count rose 6%, which lowers the price.
What do "pts" mean?

"pts" are percentage points of the share price return. The parts add up to the total shown for each period. Because price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count, higher profit pushes the price up, a higher P/E pushes it up, and more shares push it down.

Example: if the price rose 34% and profit growth accounts for +58 pts while a lower P/E accounts for -24 pts, then 58 - 24 = 34. The +58 is not the profit growth rate itself: it is the part of the price move that profit growth explains.

Not shown for 3 years and 5 years: earnings were negative at one end, or there is not enough history.

Net profit is trailing twelve months as reported with a 60-day lag.

Compare this with AVENUE SUPERMARTS LTD DMART

How rough has the ride been?

Maximum drawdown-58.1%not yet recovered
1-year volatility47.7%annualised
Beta vs sector index0.363-year daily, correlation 0.14
Volume spikes1last 90 sessions, 5x the 50-day median

Drawdown from peak

0%−20%−40%−60%202420252026−56.2% 0%−20%−40%−60%202420252026−56.2%
Largest drawdowns

-58.1% (2024-12 peak to 2026-03 low, not yet recovered)

-40.2% (2023-12 peak to 2024-03 low, recovered 2024-11)

-24.4% (2023-08 peak to 2023-09 low, recovered 2023-10)

Most recent volume spikes

2026-09-23: 5.7x the 50-day median, price +2.3% that day

Beta is the slope of daily returns against a market-cap-weighted index of the sector's other listed companies, built from today's constituents (so it excludes companies no longer listed).

Is it expensive against its own past and its peers?

66.9xP/E todayNear its historic high
Against its own history83rd percentile
CheapestMedian 60.6xDearest

Usual range 52.5x to 67.8x since 2024-06.

Against Retail Trade66.9x vs 22.4x
This company
66.9x
Sector median
22.4x

198% above the Retail Trade median.

19.8x37.8x55.7x73.7xJun '24Dec '24Jun '25Dec '25Jun '26Nov '2619.8x37.8x55.7x73.7xJun '24Apr '25Feb '26Nov '26
P/E (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianRetail Trade median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/B (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianRetail Trade median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/S (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianRetail Trade median
How to read this

Shaded band: 10th to 90th percentile of the company's own P/E history; dotted line: its median; orange line: sector median (companies with a positive multiple, at least 5 in the sector).

Sector figures are built from today's listed companies, so they exclude companies that are no longer listed.

All terms explained in the glossary →

How Retail Trade is valued

Where does it rank among Retail Trade peers?

Each cell is the company's percentile rank among its Retail Trade peers (non-financial companies) that month.
Darker is better-ranked.
Rows marked ↓ are inverted (lower debt, shorter cash cycle and a lower P/E rank higher).

Where it ranks today

  • ROCE28th▼ 61 pts vs a year ago
  • Op. margin39th▲ 17 pts vs a year ago
  • Revenue growth50th▼ 43 pts vs a year ago
  • EPS growth14th▼ 18 pts vs a year ago
  • Debt/equity ↓98thflat vs a year ago
  • Cash cycle ↓28th▼ 9 pts vs a year ago
  • P/E ↓19th▼ 21 pts vs a year ago
  • 12M momentum36th▼ 31 pts vs a year ago

Rank history

ROCE
Op. margin
Revenue growth
EPS growth
Debt/equity ↓
Cash cycle ↓
P/E ↓
12M momentum
Dec '21Jul '22Jan '23Jul '23Jan '24Jul '24Jan '25Jul '25Jan '26Jul '26Nov '26
Lower rank Higher rank Not enough data

Percentiles use today's listed companies in the sector and need at least 5 peers with a value; grey cells have too few.
ROE is computed from net profit and book value where the source does not report it.

The Retail Trade sector page Watch it move against Retail Trade in the Observatory

What is the price implying?

~27%annual earnings growth implied by the price

At a P/E of 53.9x, the price would imply about 27.3%/yr earnings growth for 10 years under the same assumptions, but it is not ranked.

Fewer than six years of annual earnings are available, which is too little to measure delivered growth.

“Implied growth” is what the current price would require under our stated assumptions, not what we expect.

What prices imply across Retail Trade The market-wide Expectations lists

Key figures

Share Priceclose 9 Nov
₹446.00
P/E
66.9x
ROCE
7.0%
Market Cap
₹773 cr
Revenue (TTM)
₹302 cr
P/S
2.6x
P/B
4.4x
ROE
6.6%
Operating Margin
6.1%
Debt / Equity
0.0x
Promoter Holding
60.2%
12M Momentum
-25.9%

52-week range

₹322.50₹612.00
43% of the way from its 52-week low to its high

Price risk

1Y volatility
47.7%
Beta vs sector
1-year daily
0.22

Balance sheet & cash

Debt service
no meaningful debt
Cash from profit, 3Y
operating cash flow ÷ net profit
-0.95x
low
Share count, 1Y
unchanged

Are profits backed by cash?

4 of 7checks within range2 beyond a threshold
Other income reliance30%Near threshold

Other income as a share of pre-tax profit (trailing twelve months): 30.4%. Bands: below 15%, 15% to 35%, above 35%.

Tax rate26%Within range

Median quarterly effective tax rate over about 2.5 years: 25.7%. Bands: 15% to 35%, 5% to 15% or 35% to 50%, outside 5% to 50%.

Cash conversion-0.95xBeyond threshold

Operating cash flow divided by net profit over the last three fiscal years: -0.95x (cash from operations ₹-40 cr, net profit ₹42 cr). Bands: 0.8x and above, 0.5x to 0.8x, below 0.5x.

Free cash flow0 of 3 yrsBeyond threshold

Fiscal years with positive free cash flow in the last 3: 0. Bands: at least 80% of years, 40% to 80%, below 40%.

Receivable days vs history-7 daysWithin range

Debtor days are below the median of the previous three fiscal years by 7 days (16 vs 23). Bands: under 15 days, 15 to 45, over 45.

Capital work in progress4% of fixed assetsWithin range

Capital work-in-progress is 4% of fixed assets. Bands: not rising or up to 30%; rising for three years and above 30%; rising and above 60%.

Payable days-7 days / 2 yrsWithin range

Days payable changed by -7 over two years. Bands: rise of up to 30 days; more than 30 days.

Tap a check to see how it is measured

How to read this

Each check is a named rule with fixed thresholds, not a score. Annual statements are the latest restated figures, so a past year may differ from what was originally reported.

All terms explained in the glossary →

Who has been buying and selling?

  • Over 3 years, promoters trimmed 9.4 pts; FIIs added 6.9 pts; DIIs added 0.5 pts.
  • The number of shareholders rose from 1,000 to 2,597 (+160%) between Sep 2023 and Jun 2026.

Holdings, Jun '26

How each group changed

GroupSep '23Jun '26Change
Promoters69.6%60.2%-9.4 pts
FIIs0.0%6.9%+6.9 pts
DIIs1.7%2.2%+0.5 pts
Public and others28.7%30.7%+2.0 pts

Number of shareholders

2,597shareholders+160% since Sep '23
1k2k2k3k Sep '23Jun '24Dec '24Jun '25Dec '25Jun '26
Sep '23: 1,000
Mar '24: 1,807
Jun '24: 2,065
Sep '24: 2,508
Dec '24: 2,798
Mar '25: 2,988
Jun '25: 3,113
Sep '25: 3,054
Dec '25: 2,946
Mar '26: 2,495
Jun '26: 2,597
1k2k2k3k Sep '23Dec '24Dec '25Jun '26
Sep '23: 1,000
Mar '24: 1,807
Jun '24: 2,065
Sep '24: 2,508
Dec '24: 2,798
Mar '25: 2,988
Jun '25: 3,113
Sep '25: 3,054
Dec '25: 2,946
Mar '26: 2,495
Jun '26: 2,597

Quarterly shareholding as reported, labelled by the quarter it covers (it becomes visible about two months later).
Shareholder counts are only available for recent quarters.

This quarter's smart-money board

What happened next to similar setups

−1.0%typical 12-month return vs the marketNot meaningfully different from the base rate
  • We found 50 past situations where a non-financial company looked like VASA DENTICITY LIMITED today on valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, price momentum, size and volatility.
  • Over the following 12 months the middle half of them returned −21% to +51% vs the market, against −2% for all non-financial companies in the same months.
  • The gap against the base rate (+0.6%, 80% range −5.1% to +12.5%) is within what chance and overlapping periods produce.

Where the 50 outcomes landed

−100%−50%0%+50%+100%
QUICKHEAL · Jan 2025: −61.8% vs market
DEN · Aug 2020: −61.4% vs market
EFORCE · Oct 2025: −60.5% vs market
DELTACORP · Apr 2023: −59.6% vs market
HARDWYN · Sep 2024: −51.8% vs market
ONMOBILE · Jan 2024: −47.3% vs market
FCSSOFT · Aug 2025: −42.5% vs market
TRACXN · Aug 2024: −42.1% vs market
HATHWAY · Feb 2024: −39.4% vs market
NIITLTD · Oct 2024: −34.3% vs market
SUNDROP · Jul 2021: −26.9% vs market
AIRAN · Jun 2022: −26.6% vs market
BOROSCI · Oct 2025: −21.2% vs market
CCHHL · Oct 2025: −19.4% vs market
CHEMBOND · Feb 2021: −18.9% vs market
ROUTE · Apr 2023: −18.8% vs market
UNICHEMLAB · Jul 2021: −17.2% vs market
SUZLON · Jun 2021: −14.3% vs market
HINDCOMPOS · Aug 2021: −8.4% vs market
ARVEE · Jun 2025: −6.8% vs market
NOCIL · Apr 2022: −4.9% vs market
ENIL · May 2021: −3.5% vs market
IKIO · Aug 2025: −3.2% vs market
LOVABLE · Nov 2022: −2.9% vs market
JTEKTINDIA · Sep 2021: −2.6% vs market
TTKHLTCARE · Apr 2021: +0.6% vs market
DENORA · Mar 2020: +4.4% vs market
LOTUSEYE · Mar 2021: +4.6% vs market
SREEL · Mar 2023: +10.7% vs market
SUBROS · Jul 2023: +12.0% vs market
KINGFA · May 2020: +18.2% vs market
CARTRADE · Sep 2023: +20.7% vs market
PRAJIND · Feb 2020: +26.8% vs market
KIOCL · Mar 2020: +34.7% vs market
SASKEN · May 2025: +44.4% vs market
NAZARA · Jun 2024: +46.3% vs market
INDOTECH · Dec 2020: +48.2% vs market
SHANTIGEAR · Jun 2021: +51.3% vs market
AUTOAXLES · Sep 2021: +54.9% vs market
BFUTILITIE · Aug 2022: +56.5% vs market
SHALBY · Jun 2020: +59.9% vs market
COMPUSOFT · Aug 2021: +59.9% vs market
WENDT · Jul 2021: +65.6% vs market
RIIL · Mar 2021: +72.8% vs market
BOROLTD · Sep 2021: +74.4% vs market
IFGLEXPOR · Jun 2020: +76.6% vs market
APTECHT · Dec 2020: +91.6% vs market
IFBIND · Jan 2020: +93.1% vs market
SCHNEIDER · Jun 2022: +119.0% vs market
RAMCOSYS · Jan 2020: +201.8% vs market
Similar setups −1.0%All companies −1.6%← worse than the marketbetter than the market →

Each dot is one past situation (hover or tap for details) · Solid dots are the closest matches, listed below · Shaded is the middle half of all companies in the same months · 2 beyond the range shown, drawn at the edge

Similar setups' median
−1.0%
All companies' median
−1.6%
Beat the market
50% vs 48%

50 past situations · 50 companies · 34 months · 2020–2025

The closest matches

CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
LOTUSEYE
Health Services
Mar 2021 80x5% +79%−15% +5%
DENORA
Electronic Technology
Mar 2020 45x4% −54%−58% +4%
BOROSCI
Producer Manufacturing
Oct 2025 69x10% −26%−29% −21%
PRAJIND
Industrial Services
Feb 2020 26x11% −33%−41% +27%
NAZARA
Technology Services
Jun 2024 118x6% +20%−10% +46%
Show the other 3 matches
CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
KIOCL
Non-Energy Minerals
Mar 2020 33x9% −58%−59% +35%
SCHNEIDER
Distribution Services
Jun 2022 85x14% −23%−34% +119%
SHANTIGEAR
Producer Manufacturing
Jun 2021 55x11% +63%−9% +51%
How reliable is this?

Matched on P/E, P/S, ROCE, operating margin, debt/equity, revenue growth, 12-month momentum, drawdown from 12-month high, size and volatility. Closest on: 12-month momentum, drawdown from 12-month high and ROCE. Not used (unavailable for this company): interest cover. One match per company and at most 7 from any one month.

Independent periods: the matches fall in 6 distinct 12-month windows. Matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, so fewer windows means less evidence.

How this is built

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to VASA DENTICITY LIMITED. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

Methodology

How historical analogs are built

Data as of 2026-11-09. Outcome pool: Jan 2020 to Oct 2025.

For every company we look at the situation it is in today (valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, 12-month price momentum, drawdown, size and volatility) and find past company-months that looked most like it. We then show what happened to those past situations over the following 12 months, measured against the ApnaFunda All index and against the base rate. It describes history. It does not predict anything.

What is compared

FeatureWeightNon-financialFinancial
P/E1yesyes
P/S1yes—
P/B1—yes
ROCE1yes—
operating margin1yes—
ROE1—yes
debt/equity0.75yes—
interest cover0.5yes—
revenue growth0.75yesyes
12-month momentum1yesyes
drawdown from 12-month high0.75yesyes
size0.75yesyes
volatility0.5yesyes

Weights were set by judgement before any outcome was looked at and are never tuned on results. Loss-making companies (negative P/E or net profit) are only matched with other loss-making companies. Banks, NBFCs and insurers are compared only with each other and use a different feature set. Every feature is converted, month by month, to its rank among companies in the same pool in that month, so a P/E of 30 in a hot market and a P/E of 22 in a cold one can match if both were equally expensive for their time. Only that month's data is used.

How closeness and the sample are defined

Distance is the weighted root-mean-square gap between the standardised features both companies have. A match needs at least 70% of the query's feature weight, a distance of at most 0.9, and 30 matches at minimum to be shown. We keep up to 50 matches with these exclusions: never the company itself, one match per company (its closest month), and at most 7 from any one calendar month so a single market episode cannot dominate.

Base rate

The base rate is the distribution of 12-month returns, relative to the market, of every eligible company-month in the same pool, with each month weighted to match the months the analogs came from. It answers: how did a random company do in these same months? Because matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, we also report the number of distinct 12-month windows behind a result, and a bootstrap that resamples months decides whether the analog median differs from the base rate at all. "Not meaningfully different" is the usual outcome and the page copy is written for it.

Limits you should know

  • One market period. The outcome pool covers 2020–2025 only (70 months), including the 2020 crash and the 2020–21 rally.
  • Survivorship. Only companies listed today are included. Delisted and bankrupt companies are missing, which flatters past outcomes, particularly for distressed-looking setups.
  • Price return only. Dividends are excluded, and the benchmark is an ApnaFunda market-cap-weighted index of the same listed companies, not an official index.
  • Reporting lag. Fundamentals are matched on an assumed 60-day lag after the quarter end, not on real announcement dates.
  • Pools: non-financial: 98,395 company-months from 2019 companies; financial: 5,659 company-months from 108 companies. 2349 companies currently have a result; the rest are suppressed because too few comparable situations exist.

Does it work? A walk-forward check

The walk-forward check has not been run for this build, so skill is shown as not yet measured.

Disclaimer

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to any company shown. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

What else looks like this?

Companies with the most similar financial profile today, regardless of industry.

Industrial Services
70%similar
debt/equitypromoter holding
Energy Minerals
60%similar
revenuevolatility
Finance
59%similar
debt/equitymarket cap
DCX SYSTEMSDCXINDIA
Producer Manufacturing
58%similar
volatilitydebt/equity
Technology Services
54%similar
debt/equitymarket cap
VAKRANGEEVAKRANGEE
Retail Trade
51%similar
revenueROCE
Retail Trade
14%similar
promoter holdingrevenue
Retail Trade
3%similar
promoter holdingP/E

Similarity is statistical, based on reported metrics; it does not imply similar business quality or future returns.

What changed?

28 events since Sep '23

  1. SepPeer rankMoved into the 3rd quartile of Retail Trade on operating margin (from the bottom quartile).
  2. SepPriceVolume reached 5.7x its 50-day median on 2026-09-23; price +2.3% that day.
  3. AugValuationP/E crossed above the 90th percentile of its own history to date (67.7x).
  4. JunPeer rankSlipped to the 3rd quartile of Retail Trade on ROCE (from the top quartile).
  5. MayPriceVolume reached 6.4x its 50-day median on 2026-05-27; price -8.4% that day.
  6. MarPromoterPromoter holding fell 5.2 pts to 60.8% (largest drop in the history since 2019-01).
  7. MarInstitutionsFII + DII holding rose 3.4 pts over 1 quarter to 8.4%.
  8. MarPriceFell 58% from the Dec 2024 peak to the Mar 2026 low.
Show 20 earlier events
  1. MarPeer rankSlipped to the bottom quartile of Retail Trade on operating margin (from the 2nd quartile).
  2. FebPriceVolume reached 31.5x its 50-day median on 2026-02-10; price -7.7% that day.
  3. DecPeer rankMoved into the 2nd quartile of Retail Trade on operating margin (from the bottom quartile).
  4. NovPriceVolume reached 5.1x its 50-day median on 2025-11-18; price +2.6% that day.
  5. SepResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned negative.
  6. SepPeer rankSlipped to the bottom quartile of Retail Trade on operating margin (from the 3rd quartile).
  7. AugPriceVolume reached 11.5x its 50-day median on 2025-08-18; price -8.6% that day.
  8. JunPromoterPromoter holding fell 2.8 pts to 66.5%.
  9. JunInstitutionsFII + DII holding rose 5.0 pts over 2 quarters to 5.3%.
  10. JunPeer rankSlipped to the 3rd quartile of Retail Trade on operating margin (from the 2nd quartile).
  11. JunSharesShare count is up 6.2% over 12 months.
  12. DecPeer rankMoved into the 2nd quartile of Retail Trade on operating margin (from the 3rd quartile).
  13. NovPriceRegained the 2023-12 peak, 8 months after the low.
  14. OctPriceVolume reached 7.1x its 50-day median on 2024-10-14; price +3.7% that day.
  15. JulPriceVolume reached 6.5x its 50-day median on 2024-07-29; price -8.9% that day.
  16. AprPriceVolume reached 6.8x its 50-day median on 2024-04-08; price +11.1% that day.
  17. MarPriceFell 40% from the Dec 2023 peak to the Mar 2024 low.
  18. MarPriceVolume reached 5.2x its 50-day median on 2024-03-19; price +3.8% that day.
  19. NovPriceVolume reached 6.1x its 50-day median on 2023-11-08; price +15.6% that day.
  20. SepPriceVolume reached 5.2x its 50-day median on 2023-09-26; price -9.5% that day.

Events are generated from the data by fixed rules.
The month shown is when the change became visible in the reported figures, assuming a 60-day lag after each quarter end; it is not an announcement date.

Where price and fundamentals disagree, market-wide Rewind the whole market to any month

Monthly history30 months · 2024-06 to 2026-11
MonthP/ERevenue (TTM)ROEROCEDebt / Equity
2026-1166.9x₹302 cr6.6%7.0%0.0x
2026-1065.2x₹302 cr6.5%7.0%0.0x
2026-0969.0x₹302 cr6.5%7.0%0.0x
2026-0867.7x₹279 cr5.7%7.0%0.0x
2026-0766.1x₹279 cr5.7%7.0%0.0x
2026-0664.4x₹279 cr5.7%7.0%0.0x
2026-0556.3x₹279 cr9.6%22.0%0.0x
2026-0458.8x₹279 cr9.6%22.0%0.0x
2026-0343.6x₹279 cr9.6%22.0%0.0x
2026-0248.2x₹269 cr11.6%22.0%0.0x
2026-0164.6x₹269 cr11.6%22.0%0.0x
2025-1261.8x₹269 cr11.6%22.0%0.0x
2025-1160.7x₹256 cr12.2%22.0%0.0x
2025-1060.6x₹256 cr12.2%22.0%0.0x
2025-0961.7x₹256 cr12.2%22.0%0.0x
2025-0859.7x₹249 cr12.7%22.0%0.0x
2025-0760.2x₹249 cr12.7%22.0%0.0x
2025-0659.3x₹249 cr12.7%22.0%0.0x
2025-0551.1x₹233 cr28.1%—0.0x
2025-0452.8x₹233 cr28.1%—0.0x
2025-0352.8x₹233 cr28.1%—0.0x
2025-0252.7x₹207 cr25.8%—0.0x
2025-0160.2x₹207 cr25.8%—0.0x
2024-1267.2x₹207 cr25.8%—0.0x
2024-1173.7x₹188 cr23.4%—0.0x
2024-1060.5x₹188 cr23.4%—0.0x
2024-0970.1x₹188 cr23.4%—0.0x
2024-0860.1x₹170 cr22.1%—0.0x
2024-0762.8x₹170 cr22.1%—0.0x
2024-0663.5x₹170 cr22.1%—0.0x

Methodology and data notes

Methodology

Methodology and data notes

All figures come from public exchange prices and screener.in financial statements. Quarterly and annual results are shown from 60 days after the period end, so a month never uses a result before it would plausibly have been published. Statements are the latest versions, which may include later restatements.

Sector medians, percentiles and indices use today's listed companies in the sector (survivorship bias). Prices are adjusted for splits and bonus issues; around a corporate action the fundamentals may lag the price by up to a month, and affected sections are hidden.

The return decomposition uses price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count. The reverse DCF uses a fixed 12% cost of equity, a 10-year horizon and a 15x terminal P/E, and is an illustration only. Events, flags and twins follow fixed rules and thresholds described next to each section.

Feedback