अApnaFunda

VAKRANGEE LIMITED (VAKRANGEE)

Retail Trade · Internet Retail · figures to Nov '26

Quality scoreHow the business itself ranks against its sector peers on profitability, 3-year growth and leverage. 50 is the middle of the sector.70 / 100
Profitability 49Growth 62Balance sheet 100
Momentum scoreHow strong the recent trend is: 3-month price change, 12-month improvement in earnings and the rise in FII + DII holding, among companies above ₹500 cr.45 / 100
Price 54Earnings 69FII/DII 11

Passes these screensCash Rich

Share price

Closing priceAdjusted for splits and bonus issues.

₹5.75 latest close · −7.3% over the last 90 sessions

₹5₹6₹6Jul 3Jul 29Aug 24Sep 17Oct 14Nov 9 ₹5₹6₹6Jul 3Sep 4Nov 9

₹5.75 month-end · −29.1% over 12 months

₹6₹8Nov '25Jan '26Apr '26Jun '26Sep '26Nov '26 ₹6₹8Nov '25May '26Nov '26

₹5.75 month-end · −69.0% over 3 years

₹10₹20₹30Nov '23Jun '24Jan '25Sep '25Apr '26Nov '26 ₹10₹20₹30Nov '23May '25Nov '26

₹5.75 month-end · −86.6% since Jan '19

₹0₹20₹40₹60Jan '19Aug '20Mar '22Sep '23Apr '25Nov '26 ₹0₹20₹40₹60Jan '19Dec '22Nov '26

52-week range ₹4.61 to ₹8.85 · 1-year volatility 42.9%

Was the rally earned?

-29%share price, 1 yearLower P/E held it back

Earnings helped, the multiple did not.

  • Per-share earnings added 30 points, but investors now pay less per rupee of profit (P/E 115.9x to 57.5x), which took 59 points back.
  • The share count barely moved.
Net profit growth: +30 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+30 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: −59 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−59 ptsP/E changeShare price: −29%−29%Share priceNet profit growth: +30 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+30ProfitP/E change: −59 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−59P/EShare price: −29%−29%Share price
Net profit growth+30 ptsNet profit rose about 43%, which lifts the price.
P/E change-59 ptsThe P/E fell from 115.9x to 57.5x, which lowers the price.
Share count change0 ptsShare count was little changed. More shares would count against the price.
-69%share price, 3 yearsLower P/E held it back

Earnings helped, the multiple did not.

  • Per-share earnings added 136 points, but investors now pay less per rupee of profit (P/E 1855.0x to 57.5x), which took 205 points back.
  • The share count barely moved.
Net profit growth: +137 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+137 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: −205 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−205 ptsP/E changeShare count change: −1 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−1 ptsShare count changeShare price: −69%−69%Share priceNet profit growth: +137 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+137ProfitP/E change: −205 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−205P/EShare count change: −1 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−1SharesShare price: −69%−69%Share price
Net profit growth+137 ptsNet profit rose about 920%, which lifts the price.
P/E change-205 ptsThe P/E fell from 1855.0x to 57.5x, which lowers the price.
Share count change-1 ptsShare count was little changed. More shares would count against the price.
-83%share price, 5 yearsEarnings-driven

Mostly earnings.

  • Per-share earnings took off 83 points, while the multiple moved less (P/E 58.0x to 57.5x).
  • The share count fell 9%.
Net profit growth: −87 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).−87 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: 0 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.0 ptsP/E changeShare count change: +4 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.+4 ptsShare count changeShare price: −83%−83%Share priceNet profit growth: −87 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).−87ProfitP/E change: 0 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.0P/EShare count change: +4 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.+4SharesShare price: −83%−83%Share price
Net profit growth-87 ptsNet profit fell about 85%, which lowers the price.
P/E change0 ptsThe P/E fell from 58.0x to 57.5x, which lowers the price.
Share count change+4 ptsShare count fell 9%, which lifts the price.
What do "pts" mean?

"pts" are percentage points of the share price return. The parts add up to the total shown for each period. Because price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count, higher profit pushes the price up, a higher P/E pushes it up, and more shares push it down.

Example: if the price rose 34% and profit growth accounts for +58 pts while a lower P/E accounts for -24 pts, then 58 - 24 = 34. The +58 is not the profit growth rate itself: it is the part of the price move that profit growth explains.

Net profit is trailing twelve months as reported with a 60-day lag.

Compare this with MEESHO

How rough has the ride been?

Maximum drawdown-93.2%not yet recovered
1-year volatility42.9%annualised
Beta vs sector index0.843-year daily, correlation 0.31
Volume spikes2last 90 sessions, 5x the 50-day median

Drawdown from peak

0%−50%−100%2020202120222023202420252026−92.7% 0%−50%−100%2020202220242026−92.7%
Largest drawdowns

-93.2% (2020-12 peak to 2026-03 low, not yet recovered)

-73.1% (2019-04 peak to 2020-04 low, recovered 2020-12)

-22.8% (2019-01 peak to 2019-01 low, recovered 2019-03)

Most recent volume spikes

2026-10-19: 6.4x the 50-day median, price -1.8% that day

2026-10-16: 15.2x the 50-day median, price +18.9% that day

Beta is the slope of daily returns against a market-cap-weighted index of the sector's other listed companies, built from today's constituents (so it excludes companies no longer listed).

Is it expensive against its own past and its peers?

57.5xP/E todayWithin its usual range
Against its own history24th percentile
CheapestMedian 103.2xDearest

Usual range 42.7x to 1722.0x since 2019-01.

Against Retail Trade57.5x vs 22.4x
This company
57.5x
Sector median
22.4x

156% above the Retail Trade median.

6.7x1009.5x2012.2x3015.0xJan '19Aug '20Mar '22Oct '23May '25Nov '266.7x1009.5x2012.2x3015.0xJan '19Sep '21May '24Nov '26
P/E (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianRetail Trade median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/B (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianRetail Trade median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/S (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianRetail Trade median
How to read this

Shaded band: 10th to 90th percentile of the company's own P/E history; dotted line: its median; orange line: sector median (companies with a positive multiple, at least 5 in the sector).

Sector figures are built from today's listed companies, so they exclude companies that are no longer listed.

All terms explained in the glossary →

How Retail Trade is valued

Where does it rank among Retail Trade peers?

Each cell is the company's percentile rank among its Retail Trade peers (non-financial companies) that month.
Darker is better-ranked.
Rows marked ↓ are inverted (lower debt, shorter cash cycle and a lower P/E rank higher).

Where it ranks today

  • ROCE36th▲ 9 pts vs a year ago
  • Op. margin61stflat vs a year ago
  • Revenue growth6th▼ 72 pts vs a year ago
  • EPS growth72nd▼ 15 pts vs a year ago
  • Debt/equity ↓89th▼ 3 pts vs a year ago
  • Cash cycle ↓87th▲ 14 pts vs a year ago
  • P/E ↓25th▲ 13 pts vs a year ago
  • 12M momentum30th▲ 22 pts vs a year ago

Rank history

ROCE
Op. margin
Revenue growth
EPS growth
Debt/equity ↓
Cash cycle ↓
P/E ↓
12M momentum
Dec '21Jul '22Jan '23Jul '23Jan '24Jul '24Jan '25Jul '25Jan '26Jul '26Nov '26
Lower rank Higher rank Not enough data

Percentiles use today's listed companies in the sector and need at least 5 peers with a value; grey cells have too few.
ROE is computed from net profit and book value where the source does not report it.

The Retail Trade sector page Watch it move against Retail Trade in the Observatory

What is the price implying?

~37%annual earnings growth implied by the price

At a P/E of 131.3x, the price would imply about 36.7%/yr earnings growth for 10 years under the same assumptions, but it is not ranked.

Below the ₹1,000 cr market-cap floor used for the lists.

“Implied growth” is what the current price would require under our stated assumptions, not what we expect.

What prices imply across Retail Trade The market-wide Expectations lists

Key figures

Share Priceclose 9 Nov
₹5.75
P/E
57.5x
ROCE
8.0%
Market Cap
₹623 cr
Revenue (TTM)
₹242 cr
P/S
2.6x
P/B
2.9x
ROE
5.1%
Operating Margin
11.9%
Debt / Equity
0.0x
Promoter Holding
40.0%
12M Momentum
-29.1%

52-week range

₹4.61₹8.85
27% of the way from its 52-week low to its high

Price risk

1Y volatility
42.9%
Beta vs sector
1-year daily
1.20

Balance sheet & cash

Interest cover
operating profit ÷ interest
10.1x
Cash from profit, 3Y
operating cash flow ÷ net profit
3.48x
Share count, 1Y
unchanged

Are profits backed by cash?

4 of 6checks within range1 beyond a threshold
Other income reliance50%Beyond threshold

Other income as a share of pre-tax profit (trailing twelve months): 50.1%. Bands: below 15%, 15% to 35%, above 35%.

Tax rate29%Within range

Median quarterly effective tax rate over about 2.5 years: 28.9%. Bands: 15% to 35%, 5% to 15% or 35% to 50%, outside 5% to 50%.

Cash conversion3.48xWithin range

Operating cash flow divided by net profit over the last three fiscal years: 3.48x (cash from operations ₹73 cr, net profit ₹21 cr). Bands: 0.8x and above, 0.5x to 0.8x, below 0.5x.

Free cash flow3 of 5 yrsNear threshold

Fiscal years with positive free cash flow in the last 5: 3. Bands: at least 80% of years, 40% to 80%, below 40%.

Receivable days vs history-45 daysWithin range

Debtor days are below the median of the previous three fiscal years by 45 days (29 vs 74). Bands: under 15 days, 15 to 45, over 45.

Capital work in progress12% of fixed assetsWithin range

Capital work-in-progress is 12% of fixed assets. Bands: not rising or up to 30%; rising for three years and above 30%; rising and above 60%.

Payable days—Not enough data

Not enough reported data to compute this.

Tap a check to see how it is measured

How to read this

Each check is a named rule with fixed thresholds, not a score. Annual statements are the latest restated figures, so a past year may differ from what was originally reported.

All terms explained in the glossary →

Who has been buying and selling?

  • Over 3 years, FIIs trimmed 3.6 pts; promoters trimmed 2.6 pts; DIIs trimmed 2.2 pts.
  • The number of shareholders rose from 3.2 lakh to 3.9 lakh (+23%) between Sep 2023 and Jun 2026.

Holdings, Jun '26

How each group changed

GroupSep '23Jun '26Change
Promoters42.6%40.0%-2.6 pts
FIIs4.0%0.3%-3.6 pts
DIIs6.3%4.0%-2.2 pts
Public and others47.1%55.5%+8.4 pts

Number of shareholders

3.9 lakhshareholders+23% since Sep '23
3.2L3.7L4.2L4.7L Sep '23Jun '24Mar '25Dec '25Jun '26
Sep '23: 3.2 lakh
Dec '23: 3.7 lakh
Mar '24: 4.7 lakh
Jun '24: 4.2 lakh
Sep '24: 4.0 lakh
Dec '24: 3.8 lakh
Mar '25: 4.1 lakh
Jun '25: 4.2 lakh
Sep '25: 4.2 lakh
Dec '25: 4.1 lakh
Mar '26: 4.0 lakh
Jun '26: 3.9 lakh
3.2L3.7L4.2L4.7L Sep '23Sep '24Sep '25Jun '26
Sep '23: 3.2 lakh
Dec '23: 3.7 lakh
Mar '24: 4.7 lakh
Jun '24: 4.2 lakh
Sep '24: 4.0 lakh
Dec '24: 3.8 lakh
Mar '25: 4.1 lakh
Jun '25: 4.2 lakh
Sep '25: 4.2 lakh
Dec '25: 4.1 lakh
Mar '26: 4.0 lakh
Jun '26: 3.9 lakh

Quarterly shareholding as reported, labelled by the quarter it covers (it becomes visible about two months later).
Shareholder counts are only available for recent quarters.

This quarter's smart-money board

What happened next to similar setups

−9.9%typical 12-month return vs the marketNot meaningfully different from the base rate
  • We found 50 past situations where a non-financial company looked like VAKRANGEE LIMITED today on valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, price momentum, size and volatility.
  • Over the following 12 months the middle half of them returned −29% to +37% vs the market, against −2% for all non-financial companies in the same months.
  • The gap against the base rate (−7.5%, 80% range −16.3% to +12.6%) is within what chance and overlapping periods produce.

Where the 50 outcomes landed

−100%−50%0%+50%+100%
FMGOETZE · Sep 2020: −59.4% vs market
HPAL · Jul 2024: −49.8% vs market
ORIENTCEM · Jul 2025: −47.6% vs market
RKSWAMY · Jun 2025: −46.8% vs market
VAIBHAVGBL · Feb 2024: −44.2% vs market
APCOTEXIND · May 2023: −43.3% vs market
SHIVALIK · Mar 2023: −41.8% vs market
SHYAMCENT · Jun 2023: −39.6% vs market
WATERBASE · Jul 2021: −39.0% vs market
DIAMINESQ · Aug 2025: −38.4% vs market
FOCUS · Oct 2025: −37.6% vs market
AIRAN · Oct 2025: −37.3% vs market
NGLFINE · Nov 2023: −28.7% vs market
MEDICAMEQ · Oct 2025: −28.1% vs market
DCXINDIA · Jun 2025: −27.9% vs market
BHAGERIA · Jun 2023: −26.6% vs market
CHEMBOND · May 2021: −24.0% vs market
JTEKTINDIA · Apr 2021: −22.1% vs market
NOVARTIND · Nov 2021: −21.9% vs market
ONMOBILE · Aug 2022: −20.1% vs market
UNIDT · Nov 2023: −18.8% vs market
SUBEXLTD · Feb 2023: −14.9% vs market
HINDCON · Oct 2025: −13.8% vs market
BOROSCI · Sep 2025: −11.1% vs market
SUNDROP · Nov 2023: −10.3% vs market
SHALBY · Oct 2021: −9.5% vs market
VARDHACRLC · Aug 2022: −7.3% vs market
SREEL · Aug 2021: −2.9% vs market
AUTOAXLES · Sep 2020: +6.8% vs market
ARVEE · Apr 2025: +7.9% vs market
NAVNETEDUL · Jan 2022: +14.1% vs market
ANTELOPUS · Jun 2021: +14.8% vs market
XPROINDIA · Jun 2024: +17.4% vs market
LOVABLE · Jun 2020: +20.1% vs market
APTECHT · Mar 2020: +24.1% vs market
MOREPENLAB · Jul 2023: +30.3% vs market
BOROLTD · Sep 2023: +31.3% vs market
LOTUSEYE · Aug 2021: +38.6% vs market
DIVGIITTS · May 2025: +42.5% vs market
GEOJITFSL · Jan 2020: +57.6% vs market
KENNAMET · Jan 2021: +59.2% vs market
TATVA · Mar 2025: +59.7% vs market
EIMCOELECO · May 2022: +70.5% vs market
WENDT · May 2021: +87.0% vs market
ORBTEXP · Sep 2021: +96.6% vs market
PILITA · Apr 2020: +103.8% vs market
KKCL · Mar 2022: +120.8% vs market
MAANALU · Feb 2020: +126.5% vs market
KABRAEXTRU · Jun 2020: +139.0% vs market
NUCLEUS · Jan 2023: +184.3% vs market
Similar setups −9.9%All companies −2.4%← worse than the marketbetter than the market →

Each dot is one past situation (hover or tap for details) · Solid dots are the closest matches, listed below · Shaded is the middle half of all companies in the same months · 5 beyond the range shown, drawn at the edge

Similar setups' median
−9.9%
All companies' median
−2.4%
Beat the market
44% vs 47%

50 past situations · 50 companies · 38 months · 2020–2025

The closest matches

CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
WATERBASE
Process Industries
Jul 2021 87x5% +37%−12% −39%
KKCL
Consumer Non-Durables
Mar 2022 62x6% +15%−29% +121%
AIRAN
Technology Services
Oct 2025 —11% −32%−38% −37%
FMGOETZE
Producer Manufacturing
Sep 2020 62x6% −22%−36% −59%
GEOJITFSL
Finance
Jan 2020 31x11% −24%−35% +58%
Show the other 3 matches
CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
UNIDT
Industrial Services
Nov 2023 48x6% −11%−16% −19%
HINDCON
Process Industries
Oct 2025 44x10% −29%−42% −14%
SREEL
Consumer Non-Durables
Aug 2021 36x5% +25%−19% −3%
How reliable is this?

Matched on P/E, P/S, ROCE, operating margin, debt/equity, interest cover, revenue growth, 12-month momentum, drawdown from 12-month high, size and volatility. Closest on: 12-month momentum, drawdown from 12-month high and ROCE. One match per company and at most 7 from any one month.

Independent periods: the matches fall in 6 distinct 12-month windows. Matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, so fewer windows means less evidence.

How this is built

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to VAKRANGEE LIMITED. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

Methodology

How historical analogs are built

Data as of 2026-11-09. Outcome pool: Jan 2020 to Oct 2025.

For every company we look at the situation it is in today (valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, 12-month price momentum, drawdown, size and volatility) and find past company-months that looked most like it. We then show what happened to those past situations over the following 12 months, measured against the ApnaFunda All index and against the base rate. It describes history. It does not predict anything.

What is compared

FeatureWeightNon-financialFinancial
P/E1yesyes
P/S1yes—
P/B1—yes
ROCE1yes—
operating margin1yes—
ROE1—yes
debt/equity0.75yes—
interest cover0.5yes—
revenue growth0.75yesyes
12-month momentum1yesyes
drawdown from 12-month high0.75yesyes
size0.75yesyes
volatility0.5yesyes

Weights were set by judgement before any outcome was looked at and are never tuned on results. Loss-making companies (negative P/E or net profit) are only matched with other loss-making companies. Banks, NBFCs and insurers are compared only with each other and use a different feature set. Every feature is converted, month by month, to its rank among companies in the same pool in that month, so a P/E of 30 in a hot market and a P/E of 22 in a cold one can match if both were equally expensive for their time. Only that month's data is used.

How closeness and the sample are defined

Distance is the weighted root-mean-square gap between the standardised features both companies have. A match needs at least 70% of the query's feature weight, a distance of at most 0.9, and 30 matches at minimum to be shown. We keep up to 50 matches with these exclusions: never the company itself, one match per company (its closest month), and at most 7 from any one calendar month so a single market episode cannot dominate.

Base rate

The base rate is the distribution of 12-month returns, relative to the market, of every eligible company-month in the same pool, with each month weighted to match the months the analogs came from. It answers: how did a random company do in these same months? Because matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, we also report the number of distinct 12-month windows behind a result, and a bootstrap that resamples months decides whether the analog median differs from the base rate at all. "Not meaningfully different" is the usual outcome and the page copy is written for it.

Limits you should know

  • One market period. The outcome pool covers 2020–2025 only (70 months), including the 2020 crash and the 2020–21 rally.
  • Survivorship. Only companies listed today are included. Delisted and bankrupt companies are missing, which flatters past outcomes, particularly for distressed-looking setups.
  • Price return only. Dividends are excluded, and the benchmark is an ApnaFunda market-cap-weighted index of the same listed companies, not an official index.
  • Reporting lag. Fundamentals are matched on an assumed 60-day lag after the quarter end, not on real announcement dates.
  • Pools: non-financial: 98,395 company-months from 2019 companies; financial: 5,659 company-months from 108 companies. 2349 companies currently have a result; the rest are suppressed because too few comparable situations exist.

Does it work? A walk-forward check

The walk-forward check has not been run for this build, so skill is shown as not yet measured.

Disclaimer

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to any company shown. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

What else looks like this?

Companies with the most similar financial profile today, regardless of industry.

NIITNIITLTD
Commercial Services
58%similar
promoter holdingrevenue growth
Distribution Services
53%similar
market capdebt/equity
Producer Manufacturing
49%similar
revenuerevenue growth
LAXMI DENTALLAXMIDENTL
Health Technology
46%similar
revenuepromoter holding
Technology Services
43%similar
volatilityrevenue
VASA DENTICITYDENTALKART
Retail Trade
51%similar
revenueROCE
ETHOSETHOSLTD
Retail Trade
20%similar
P/Eoperating margin
Retail Trade
16%similar
revenuedebt/equity

Similarity is statistical, based on reported metrics; it does not imply similar business quality or future returns.

What changed?

30 events since Apr '22

  1. OctPriceVolume reached 15.2x its 50-day median on 2026-10-16; price +18.9% that day.
  2. SepPeer rankSlipped to the 2nd quartile of Retail Trade on EPS growth (from the top quartile).
  3. MarPriceFell 93% from the Dec 2020 peak to the Mar 2026 low.
  4. JanPriceVolume reached 6.1x its 50-day median on 2026-01-27; price +5.9% that day.
  5. OctPriceVolume reached 12.0x its 50-day median on 2025-10-27; price +4.2% that day.
  6. SepPriceVolume reached 16.6x its 50-day median on 2025-09-19; price -4.3% that day.
  7. JunPeer rankMoved into the 2nd quartile of Retail Trade on operating margin (from the 3rd quartile).
  8. JunDividendDividend payout cut from 122% to 0% of profit.
Show 22 earlier events
  1. MarPeer rankSlipped to the 3rd quartile of Retail Trade on operating margin (from the 2nd quartile).
  2. FebPriceVolume reached 6.3x its 50-day median on 2025-02-06; price -5.0% that day.
  3. JanDebtDebt / equity halved over 12 months to 0.07x.
  4. OctPriceVolume reached 10.0x its 50-day median on 2024-10-01; price -2.1% that day.
  5. SepPriceVolume reached 22.3x its 50-day median on 2024-09-30; price +13.2% that day.
  6. JunResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned positive.
  7. JunPeer rankMoved into the 3rd quartile of Retail Trade on ROCE (from the bottom quartile).
  8. JunDebtDebt / equity halved over 12 months to 0.07x.
  9. JunDividendDividend payout cut from 530% to 122% of profit.
  10. AprPriceVolume reached 7.1x its 50-day median on 2024-04-29; price +7.4% that day.
  11. JanPriceVolume reached 11.5x its 50-day median on 2024-01-31; price +19.9% that day.
  12. OctPriceVolume reached 23.4x its 50-day median on 2023-10-17; price +4.9% that day.
  13. AugPriceVolume reached 33.5x its 50-day median on 2023-08-10; price +6.5% that day.
  14. JunResultsEPS (TTM) turned positive.
  15. JunValuationP/E crossed above the 90th percentile of its own history to date (1630.0x).
  16. AprPriceVolume reached 27.4x its 50-day median on 2023-04-06; price +14.0% that day.
  17. MarPriceVolume reached 24.2x its 50-day median on 2023-03-23; price -9.5% that day.
  18. DecPriceVolume reached 13.7x its 50-day median on 2022-12-09; price -9.2% that day.
  19. SepPriceVolume reached 27.1x its 50-day median on 2022-09-07; price +12.4% that day.
  20. JunResultsEPS (TTM) turned negative.
  21. JunPeer rankSlipped to the bottom quartile of Retail Trade on ROCE (from the 3rd quartile).
  22. AprPriceVolume reached 11.5x its 50-day median on 2022-04-13; price +10.9% that day.

Events are generated from the data by fixed rules.
The month shown is when the change became visible in the reported figures, assuming a 60-day lag after each quarter end; it is not an announcement date.

Where price and fundamentals disagree, market-wide Rewind the whole market to any month

Monthly history95 months · 2019-01 to 2026-11
MonthP/ERevenue (TTM)ROEROCEDebt / Equity
2026-1157.5x₹242 cr5.1%8.0%0.0x
2026-1055.6x₹242 cr5.2%8.0%0.0x
2026-0951.4x₹242 cr5.2%8.0%0.0x
2026-0852.9x₹255 cr5.8%8.0%0.0x
2026-0754.3x₹255 cr5.8%8.0%0.0x
2026-0655.5x₹255 cr5.8%8.0%0.0x
2026-0559.8x₹261 cr6.6%6.0%0.0x
2026-0462.7x₹261 cr6.6%6.0%0.0x
2026-0342.5x₹261 cr6.6%6.0%0.0x
2026-0272.1x₹269 cr4.8%6.0%0.0x
2026-0177.1x₹269 cr4.8%6.0%0.0x
2025-1287.1x₹269 cr4.8%6.0%0.0x
2025-11115.9x₹265 cr3.8%6.0%0.0x
2025-10125.4x₹265 cr3.8%6.0%0.0x
2025-09115.9x₹265 cr3.8%6.0%0.0x
2025-08139.7x₹255 cr3.2%6.0%0.0x
2025-07153.2x₹255 cr3.2%6.0%0.0x
2025-06169.7x₹255 cr3.2%6.0%0.0x
2025-05162.3x₹246 cr3.9%7.0%0.1x
2025-04165.0x₹246 cr3.9%7.0%0.1x
2025-03156.8x₹246 cr3.9%7.0%0.1x
2025-02230.3x₹229 cr3.9%7.0%0.1x
2025-01399.0x₹229 cr3.9%7.0%0.1x
2024-12568.7x₹229 cr3.9%7.0%0.1x
2024-11480.8x₹216 cr3.3%7.0%0.1x
2024-10532.6x₹216 cr3.3%7.0%0.1x
2024-09714.6x₹216 cr3.3%7.0%0.1x
2024-08513.5x₹213 cr2.6%7.0%0.1x
2024-07551.3x₹213 cr2.6%7.0%0.1x
2024-06567.0x₹213 cr2.6%7.0%0.1x
2024-052220.0x₹197 cr0.9%3.0%0.5x
2024-042660.0x₹197 cr0.9%3.0%0.5x
2024-031985.0x₹197 cr0.9%3.0%0.5x
2024-022515.0x₹197 cr0.9%3.0%0.5x
2024-013015.0x₹197 cr0.9%3.0%0.5x
2023-121895.0x₹197 cr0.9%3.0%0.5x
2023-111855.0x₹197 cr0.9%3.0%0.5x
2023-101765.0x₹197 cr0.9%3.0%0.5x
2023-091745.0x₹197 cr0.9%3.0%0.5x
2023-081550.0x₹197 cr0.9%3.0%0.5x
2023-071575.0x₹197 cr0.9%3.0%0.5x
2023-061630.0x₹197 cr0.9%3.0%0.5x
2023-05—₹194 cr0.0%0.0%0.2x
2023-04—₹194 cr0.0%0.0%0.2x
2023-03—₹194 cr0.0%0.0%0.2x
2023-02—₹194 cr0.0%0.0%0.2x
2023-01—₹194 cr0.0%0.0%0.2x
2022-12—₹194 cr0.0%0.0%0.2x
2022-11—₹194 cr0.0%0.0%0.2x
2022-10—₹194 cr0.0%0.0%0.2x
2022-09—₹194 cr0.0%0.0%0.2x
2022-08—₹194 cr0.0%0.0%0.2x
2022-07—₹194 cr0.0%0.0%0.2x
2022-06—₹194 cr0.0%0.0%0.2x
2022-0548.5x₹314 cr2.6%3.0%0.0x
2022-0459.2x₹314 cr2.6%3.0%0.0x
2022-0358.8x₹314 cr2.6%3.0%0.0x
2022-0253.1x₹314 cr2.6%3.0%0.0x
2022-0166.8x₹314 cr2.6%3.0%0.0x
2021-1274.7x₹314 cr2.6%3.0%0.0x
2021-1158.0x₹314 cr2.6%3.0%0.0x
2021-1062.4x₹314 cr2.6%3.0%0.0x
2021-0968.6x₹314 cr2.6%3.0%0.0x
2021-0866.3x₹314 cr2.6%3.0%0.0x
2021-0761.2x₹314 cr2.6%3.0%0.0x
2021-0670.8x₹314 cr2.6%3.0%0.0x
2021-0562.5x₹685 cr3.0%3.0%0.0x
2021-0476.0x₹685 cr3.0%3.0%0.0x
2021-0383.7x₹685 cr3.0%3.0%0.0x
2021-0279.4x₹685 cr3.0%3.0%0.0x
2021-0178.0x₹685 cr3.0%3.0%0.0x
2020-12103.2x₹685 cr3.0%3.0%0.0x
2020-1157.3x₹685 cr3.0%3.0%0.0x
2020-1042.2x₹685 cr3.0%3.0%0.0x
2020-0943.3x₹685 cr3.0%3.0%0.0x
2020-0841.8x₹685 cr3.0%3.0%0.0x
2020-0742.2x₹685 cr3.0%3.0%0.0x
2020-0652.3x₹685 cr3.0%3.0%0.0x
2020-05109.8x₹1508 cr1.1%2.0%0.0x
2020-04107.3x₹1508 cr1.1%2.0%0.0x
2020-0382.9x₹1508 cr1.1%2.0%0.0x
2020-02164.6x₹1508 cr1.1%2.0%0.0x
2020-01208.3x₹1508 cr1.1%2.0%0.0x
2019-12199.0x₹1508 cr1.1%2.0%0.0x
2019-11172.3x₹1508 cr1.1%2.0%0.0x
2019-10147.9x₹1508 cr1.1%2.0%0.0x
2019-09125.8x₹1508 cr1.1%2.0%0.0x
2019-08128.5x₹1508 cr1.1%2.0%0.0x
2019-07142.3x₹1508 cr1.1%2.0%0.0x
2019-06140.8x₹1508 cr1.1%2.0%0.0x
2019-057.3x₹6502 cr29.1%43.0%0.0x
2019-049.8x₹6502 cr29.1%43.0%0.0x
2019-037.8x₹6502 cr29.1%43.0%0.0x
2019-026.8x₹6502 cr29.1%43.0%0.0x
2019-016.7x₹6502 cr29.1%43.0%0.0x

Methodology and data notes

Methodology

Methodology and data notes

All figures come from public exchange prices and screener.in financial statements. Quarterly and annual results are shown from 60 days after the period end, so a month never uses a result before it would plausibly have been published. Statements are the latest versions, which may include later restatements.

Sector medians, percentiles and indices use today's listed companies in the sector (survivorship bias). Prices are adjusted for splits and bonus issues; around a corporate action the fundamentals may lag the price by up to a month, and affected sections are hidden.

The return decomposition uses price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count. The reverse DCF uses a fixed 12% cost of equity, a 10-year horizon and a 15x terminal P/E, and is an illustration only. Events, flags and twins follow fixed rules and thresholds described next to each section.

Feedback