अApnaFunda

ETHOS LIMITED (ETHOSLTD)

Retail Trade · Catalog/Specialty Distribution · figures to Nov '26

Quality scoreHow the business itself ranks against its sector peers on profitability, 3-year growth and leverage. 50 is the middle of the sector.67 / 100
Profitability 56Growth 67Balance sheet 77
Momentum scoreHow strong the recent trend is: 3-month price change, 12-month improvement in earnings and the rise in FII + DII holding, among companies above ₹500 cr.66 / 100
Price 65Earnings 39FII/DII 95

Passes these screensPrice ahead of businessLittle growth priced in

Share price

Closing priceAdjusted for splits and bonus issues.

₹2,820.9 latest close · +13.1% over the last 90 sessions

₹2,400₹2,600₹2,800₹3,000Jul 3Jul 29Aug 24Sep 17Oct 14Nov 9 ₹2,400₹2,600₹2,800₹3,000Jul 3Sep 4Nov 9

₹2,820.9 month-end · −7.6% over 12 months

₹2,500₹3,000Nov '25Jan '26Apr '26Jun '26Sep '26Nov '26 ₹2,500₹3,000Nov '25May '26Nov '26

₹2,820.9 month-end · +44.7% over 3 years

₹2,000₹2,500₹3,000Nov '23Jun '24Jan '25Sep '25Apr '26Nov '26 ₹2,000₹2,500₹3,000Nov '23May '25Nov '26

₹2,820.9 month-end · +262.5% since May '22

₹1,000₹2,000₹3,000May '22Apr '23Mar '24Jan '25Dec '25Nov '26 ₹1,000₹2,000₹3,000May '22Aug '24Nov '26

52-week range ₹1919.40 to ₹3245.90 · 1-year volatility 36.4%

Was the rally earned?

-8%share price, 1 yearLower P/E held it back

Earnings helped, the multiple did not.

  • Per-share earnings added 12 points, but investors now pay less per rupee of profit (P/E 88.4x to 72.3x), which took 19 points back.
  • The share count barely moved.
Net profit growth: +12 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+12 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: −19 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−19 ptsP/E changeShare count change: 0 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.0 ptsShare count changeShare price: −8%−8%Share priceNet profit growth: +12 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+12ProfitP/E change: −19 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−19P/EShare count change: 0 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.0SharesShare price: −8%−8%Share price
Net profit growth+12 ptsNet profit rose about 13%, which lifts the price.
P/E change-19 ptsThe P/E fell from 88.4x to 72.3x, which lowers the price.
Share count change0 ptsShare count was little changed. More shares would count against the price.
+45%share price, 3 yearsLower P/E held it back

Mostly yes, with a catch.

  • Per-share earnings added 61 points, but investors now pay less per rupee of profit (P/E 82.4x to 72.3x), which took 16 points back.
  • The share count rose 6%.
Net profit growth: +67 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+67 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: −16 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−16 ptsP/E changeShare count change: −6 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−6 ptsShare count changeShare price: +45%+45%Share priceNet profit growth: +67 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+67ProfitP/E change: −16 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−16P/EShare count change: −6 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−6SharesShare price: +45%+45%Share price
Net profit growth+67 ptsNet profit rose about 74%, which lifts the price.
P/E change-16 ptsThe P/E fell from 82.4x to 72.3x, which lowers the price.
Share count change-6 ptsShare count rose 6%, which lowers the price.
What do "pts" mean?

"pts" are percentage points of the share price return. The parts add up to the total shown for each period. Because price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count, higher profit pushes the price up, a higher P/E pushes it up, and more shares push it down.

Example: if the price rose 34% and profit growth accounts for +58 pts while a lower P/E accounts for -24 pts, then 58 - 24 = 34. The +58 is not the profit growth rate itself: it is the part of the price move that profit growth explains.

Not shown for 5 years: earnings were negative at one end, or there is not enough history.

Net profit is trailing twelve months as reported with a 60-day lag.

Compare with other companies

How rough has the ride been?

Maximum drawdown-39.2%not yet recovered
1-year volatility36.4%annualised
Beta vs sector index0.713-year daily, correlation 0.36
Volume spikes7last 90 sessions, 5x the 50-day median

Drawdown from peak

0%−20%−40%2023202420252026−39.2% 0%−20%−40%2023202420252026−39.2%
Largest drawdowns

-39.2% (2024-09 peak to 2026-03 low, not yet recovered)

-22.6% (2024-02 peak to 2024-05 low, recovered 2024-06)

-21.7% (2022-08 peak to 2022-11 low, recovered 2023-04)

Most recent volume spikes

2026-09-29: 5.2x the 50-day median, price -1.1% that day

2026-08-18: 51x the 50-day median, price +3.7% that day

2026-08-05: 5.6x the 50-day median, price -0.7% that day

Beta is the slope of daily returns against a market-cap-weighted index of the sector's other listed companies, built from today's constituents (so it excludes companies no longer listed).

Is it expensive against its own past and its peers?

72.3xP/E todayWithin its usual range
Against its own history36th percentile
CheapestMedian 82.4xDearest

Usual range 65.6x to 101.3x since 2022-05.

Against Retail Trade72.3x vs 22.4x
This company
72.3x
Sector median
22.4x

223% above the Retail Trade median.

19.8x121.8x223.7x325.6xMay '22Apr '23Mar '24Feb '25Jan '26Nov '2619.8x121.8x223.7x325.6xMay '22Nov '23May '25Nov '26
P/E (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianRetail Trade median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/B (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianRetail Trade median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/S (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianRetail Trade median
How to read this

Shaded band: 10th to 90th percentile of the company's own P/E history; dotted line: its median; orange line: sector median (companies with a positive multiple, at least 5 in the sector).

Sector figures are built from today's listed companies, so they exclude companies that are no longer listed.

All terms explained in the glossary →

How Retail Trade is valued

Where does it rank among Retail Trade peers?

Each cell is the company's percentile rank among its Retail Trade peers (non-financial companies) that month.
Darker is better-ranked.
Rows marked ↓ are inverted (lower debt, shorter cash cycle and a lower P/E rank higher).

Where it ranks today

  • ROCE48th▼ 7 pts vs a year ago
  • Op. margin65thflat vs a year ago
  • Revenue growth77th▼ 8 pts vs a year ago
  • EPS growth40th▼ 10 pts vs a year ago
  • Debt/equity ↓65thflat vs a year ago
  • Cash cycle ↓25thflat vs a year ago
  • P/E ↓17th▼ 14 pts vs a year ago
  • 12M momentum58th▼ 27 pts vs a year ago

Rank history

ROCE
Op. margin
Revenue growth
EPS growth
Debt/equity ↓
Cash cycle ↓
P/E ↓
12M momentum
Dec '21Jul '22Jan '23Jul '23Jan '24Jul '24Jan '25Jul '25Jan '26Jul '26Nov '26
Lower rank Higher rank Not enough data

Percentiles use today's listed companies in the sector and need at least 5 peers with a value; grey cells have too few.
ROE is computed from net profit and book value where the source does not report it.

The Retail Trade sector page Watch it move against Retail Trade in the Observatory

What is the price implying?

~37%annual earnings growth implied by the priceBelow delivered growth

At normalised P/E (five-year average earnings) of 108.1x, a holder earning 12%/yr needs earnings to grow about 36.5%/yr for 10 years, then trade at 15x.

Delivered62.0%/yrEPS, last 8 fiscal years · 3-yr avg to 3-yr avg
Gap−23.5 ptsimplied minus delivered
Rank794thmost demanding of 856

Over time

Implied growth by month (solid) and delivered growth (dashed).

0%47%95% May 2022Nov 2026 0%47%95% May 2022Nov 2026

Change the assumptions

Exit P/E / return11%12%13%
12x38.3%39.5%40.8%
15x35.2%36.5%37.7%
20x31.4%32.6%33.8%

Drag a slider to test other assumptions

Implied: 36.5%/yr

“Implied growth” is what the current price would require under our stated assumptions, not what we expect. How this is calculated and the market-wide lists.

What prices imply across Retail Trade The market-wide Expectations lists

Key figures

Share Priceclose 9 Nov
₹2820.90
P/E
72.3x
ROCE
10.0%
Market Cap
₹7547 cr
Revenue (TTM)
₹1728 cr
P/S
4.4x
P/B
5.1x
ROE
7.0%
Operating Margin
13.0%
Debt / Equity
0.2x
Promoter Holding
50.6%
12M Momentum
-7.6%

52-week range

₹1919.40₹3245.90
68% of the way from its 52-week low to its high

Price risk

1Y volatility
36.4%
Beta vs sector
1-year daily
0.86

Balance sheet & cash

Interest cover
operating profit ÷ interest
5.8x
Cash from profit, 3Y
operating cash flow ÷ net profit
0.37x
low
Share count, 1Y
+12.5%

Are profits backed by cash?

4 of 7checks within range3 beyond a threshold
Other income reliance36%Beyond threshold

Other income as a share of pre-tax profit (trailing twelve months): 36.1%. Bands: below 15%, 15% to 35%, above 35%.

Tax rate26%Within range

Median quarterly effective tax rate over about 2.5 years: 26.0%. Bands: 15% to 35%, 5% to 15% or 35% to 50%, outside 5% to 50%.

Cash conversion0.37xBeyond threshold

Operating cash flow divided by net profit over the last three fiscal years: 0.37x (cash from operations ₹101 cr, net profit ₹275 cr). Bands: 0.8x and above, 0.5x to 0.8x, below 0.5x.

Free cash flow1 of 5 yrsBeyond threshold

Fiscal years with positive free cash flow in the last 5: 1. Bands: at least 80% of years, 40% to 80%, below 40%.

Receivable days vs history-1 daysWithin range

Debtor days are below the median of the previous three fiscal years by 1 days (4 vs 5). Bands: under 15 days, 15 to 45, over 45.

Capital work in progress2% of fixed assetsWithin range

Capital work-in-progress is 2% of fixed assets. Bands: not rising or up to 30%; rising for three years and above 30%; rising and above 60%.

Payable days-5 days / 2 yrsWithin range

Days payable changed by -5 over two years. Bands: rise of up to 30 days; more than 30 days.

Tap a check to see how it is measured

How to read this

Each check is a named rule with fixed thresholds, not a score. Annual statements are the latest restated figures, so a past year may differ from what was originally reported.

All terms explained in the glossary →

Who has been buying and selling?

  • Over 2 years, DIIs added 11.7 pts; promoters trimmed 7.3 pts; FIIs added 0.9 pts.
  • The number of shareholders rose from 27,067 to 36,940 (+36%) between Dec 2023 and Jun 2026.

Holdings, Jun '26

How each group changed

GroupDec '23Jun '26Change
Promoters57.9%50.6%-7.3 pts
FIIs10.4%11.3%+0.9 pts
DIIs12.2%23.9%+11.7 pts
Public and others19.5%14.2%-5.4 pts

Number of shareholders

36,940shareholders+36% since Dec '23
27k32k38k43k Dec '23Jun '24Dec '24Jun '25Dec '25Jun '26
Dec '23: 27,067
Mar '24: 29,715
Jun '24: 32,330
Sep '24: 35,858
Dec '24: 39,756
Mar '25: 42,900
Jun '25: 41,464
Sep '25: 40,447
Dec '25: 40,326
Mar '26: 38,627
Jun '26: 36,940
27k32k38k43k Dec '23Dec '24Dec '25Jun '26
Dec '23: 27,067
Mar '24: 29,715
Jun '24: 32,330
Sep '24: 35,858
Dec '24: 39,756
Mar '25: 42,900
Jun '25: 41,464
Sep '25: 40,447
Dec '25: 40,326
Mar '26: 38,627
Jun '26: 36,940

Quarterly shareholding as reported, labelled by the quarter it covers (it becomes visible about two months later).
Shareholder counts are only available for recent quarters.

This quarter's smart-money board

What happened next to similar setups

−0.5%typical 12-month return vs the marketNot meaningfully different from the base rate
  • We found 50 past situations where a non-financial company looked like ETHOS LIMITED today on valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, price momentum, size and volatility.
  • Over the following 12 months the middle half of them returned −20% to +21% vs the market, against −2% for all non-financial companies in the same months.
  • The gap against the base rate (+1.8%, 80% range −7.6% to +8.8%) is within what chance and overlapping periods produce.

Where the 50 outcomes landed

−100%−50%0%+50%+100%
ASIANTILES · Jan 2021: −63.0% vs market
TASTYBITE · Jul 2023: −52.4% vs market
AEGISLOG · May 2021: −43.9% vs market
VIPIND · Feb 2023: −42.0% vs market
CYIENTDLM · Jul 2024: −40.7% vs market
BOROLTD · Jan 2025: −39.0% vs market
RKFORGE · Mar 2025: −38.0% vs market
NEOGEN · May 2023: −35.8% vs market
INDHOTEL · Jan 2020: −28.2% vs market
BEML · Mar 2022: −27.2% vs market
SOTL · Feb 2021: −25.3% vs market
ZYDUSWELL · Jun 2021: −22.1% vs market
GENUSPOWER · Oct 2024: −19.9% vs market
SHK · Nov 2020: −19.8% vs market
SUNDROP · Mar 2021: −18.5% vs market
INDOCO · May 2021: −16.9% vs market
SEAMECLTD · Mar 2024: −13.5% vs market
TTKHLTCARE · Dec 2020: −11.6% vs market
ELDEHSG · Sep 2025: −8.4% vs market
RAMCOCEM · May 2020: −8.1% vs market
CERA · Jun 2021: −7.9% vs market
MIDHANI · May 2025: −2.9% vs market
STARCEMENT · Mar 2025: −2.9% vs market
CENTURYPLY · Jun 2025: −1.6% vs market
VGUARD · Aug 2023: −1.0% vs market
NAVNETEDUL · Sep 2022: 0% vs market
NAZARA · Dec 2023: +0.6% vs market
NH · Jan 2021: +6.5% vs market
ANURAS · Jul 2022: +6.7% vs market
FORTIS · Jul 2022: +8.3% vs market
IPCALAB · Aug 2024: +8.4% vs market
ASHIANA · Sep 2023: +9.1% vs market
METROPOLIS · Jul 2025: +10.8% vs market
IXIGO · Jun 2025: +11.6% vs market
ABREL · Jul 2022: +11.7% vs market
GREENLAM · Jul 2022: +18.5% vs market
MAXHEALTH · Sep 2022: +19.9% vs market
BIKAJI · Dec 2023: +21.4% vs market
SUNTECK · Jul 2021: +26.5% vs market
AFFLE · Aug 2024: +26.8% vs market
MATRIMONY · Jul 2020: +30.3% vs market
THERMAX · Jul 2023: +32.3% vs market
ASTRAMICRO · Oct 2021: +33.4% vs market
ELGIEQUIP · Dec 2021: +35.3% vs market
RADICO · Jun 2024: +43.5% vs market
ACUTAAS · Sep 2024: +63.9% vs market
DALBHARAT · Sep 2020: +64.7% vs market
UNOMINDA · Jan 2021: +77.6% vs market
CHOICEIN · Oct 2023: +82.1% vs market
MTARTECH · Jun 2025: +379.4% vs market
Similar setups −0.5%All companies −2.3%← worse than the marketbetter than the market →

Each dot is one past situation (hover or tap for details) · Solid dots are the closest matches, listed below · Shaded is the middle half of all companies in the same months · 1 beyond the range shown, drawn at the edge

Similar setups' median
−0.5%
All companies' median
−2.3%
Beat the market
50% vs 48%

50 past situations · 50 companies · 36 months · 2020–2025

The closest matches

CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
RADICO
Consumer Non-Durables
Jun 2024 91x13% +48%−3% +44%
INDOCO
Health Technology
May 2021 150x6% +86%−1% −17%
BOROLTD
Producer Manufacturing
Jan 2025 65x14% +10%−23% −39%
BEML
Producer Manufacturing
Mar 2022 110x5% +45%−11% −27%
FORTIS
Health Services
Jul 2022 38x10% +11%−10% +8%
Show the other 3 matches
CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
NEOGEN
Process Industries
May 2023 90x14% +9%−2% −36%
THERMAX
Producer Manufacturing
Jul 2023 69x15% +26%−1% +32%
UNOMINDA
Producer Manufacturing
Jan 2021 80x11% +17%−9% +78%
How reliable is this?

Matched on P/E, P/S, ROCE, operating margin, debt/equity, interest cover, revenue growth, 12-month momentum, drawdown from 12-month high, size and volatility. Closest on: 12-month momentum, P/E and drawdown from 12-month high. One match per company and at most 7 from any one month.

Independent periods: the matches fall in 6 distinct 12-month windows. Matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, so fewer windows means less evidence.

How this is built

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to ETHOS LIMITED. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

Methodology

How historical analogs are built

Data as of 2026-11-09. Outcome pool: Jan 2020 to Oct 2025.

For every company we look at the situation it is in today (valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, 12-month price momentum, drawdown, size and volatility) and find past company-months that looked most like it. We then show what happened to those past situations over the following 12 months, measured against the ApnaFunda All index and against the base rate. It describes history. It does not predict anything.

What is compared

FeatureWeightNon-financialFinancial
P/E1yesyes
P/S1yes—
P/B1—yes
ROCE1yes—
operating margin1yes—
ROE1—yes
debt/equity0.75yes—
interest cover0.5yes—
revenue growth0.75yesyes
12-month momentum1yesyes
drawdown from 12-month high0.75yesyes
size0.75yesyes
volatility0.5yesyes

Weights were set by judgement before any outcome was looked at and are never tuned on results. Loss-making companies (negative P/E or net profit) are only matched with other loss-making companies. Banks, NBFCs and insurers are compared only with each other and use a different feature set. Every feature is converted, month by month, to its rank among companies in the same pool in that month, so a P/E of 30 in a hot market and a P/E of 22 in a cold one can match if both were equally expensive for their time. Only that month's data is used.

How closeness and the sample are defined

Distance is the weighted root-mean-square gap between the standardised features both companies have. A match needs at least 70% of the query's feature weight, a distance of at most 0.9, and 30 matches at minimum to be shown. We keep up to 50 matches with these exclusions: never the company itself, one match per company (its closest month), and at most 7 from any one calendar month so a single market episode cannot dominate.

Base rate

The base rate is the distribution of 12-month returns, relative to the market, of every eligible company-month in the same pool, with each month weighted to match the months the analogs came from. It answers: how did a random company do in these same months? Because matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, we also report the number of distinct 12-month windows behind a result, and a bootstrap that resamples months decides whether the analog median differs from the base rate at all. "Not meaningfully different" is the usual outcome and the page copy is written for it.

Limits you should know

  • One market period. The outcome pool covers 2020–2025 only (70 months), including the 2020 crash and the 2020–21 rally.
  • Survivorship. Only companies listed today are included. Delisted and bankrupt companies are missing, which flatters past outcomes, particularly for distressed-looking setups.
  • Price return only. Dividends are excluded, and the benchmark is an ApnaFunda market-cap-weighted index of the same listed companies, not an official index.
  • Reporting lag. Fundamentals are matched on an assumed 60-day lag after the quarter end, not on real announcement dates.
  • Pools: non-financial: 98,395 company-months from 2019 companies; financial: 5,659 company-months from 108 companies. 2349 companies currently have a result; the rest are suppressed because too few comparable situations exist.

Does it work? A walk-forward check

The walk-forward check has not been run for this build, so skill is shown as not yet measured.

Disclaimer

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to any company shown. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

What else looks like this?

Companies with the most similar financial profile today, regardless of industry.

KDDLKDDL
Consumer Durables
69%similar
promoter holdingrevenue growth
Consumer Non-Durables
68%similar
operating marginEPS growth
Health Services
68%similar
revenue growthmarket cap
INNOVA CAPTABINNOVACAP
Health Technology
64%similar
revenuepromoter holding
SOBHASOBHA
Finance
61%similar
debt/equityP/E
Retail Trade
50%similar
volatilitymarket cap
Retail Trade
42%similar
market capP/E
Retail Trade
41%similar
market capROCE

Similarity is statistical, based on reported metrics; it does not imply similar business quality or future returns.

What changed?

30 events since Jun '23

  1. SepResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned positive.
  2. SepValuationP/E fell below the 10th percentile of its own history to date (65.1x).
  3. AugPriceVolume reached 98.7x its 50-day median on 2026-08-03; price +15.0% that day.
  4. JunResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned negative.
  5. JunPeer rankSlipped to the 3rd quartile of Retail Trade on ROCE (from the 2nd quartile).
  6. JunSharesShare count is up 12.5% over 12 months.
  7. AprPriceVolume reached 15.8x its 50-day median on 2026-04-22; price +10.0% that day.
  8. MarPriceFell 39% from the Sep 2024 peak to the Mar 2026 low.
Show 22 earlier events
  1. MarValuationP/E fell below the 10th percentile of its own history to date (60.9x).
  2. FebPriceVolume reached 6.6x its 50-day median on 2026-02-12; price -0.8% that day.
  3. DecPeer rankSlipped to the 3rd quartile of Retail Trade on EPS growth (from the 2nd quartile).
  4. SepPeer rankSlipped to the 2nd quartile of Retail Trade on operating margin (from the top quartile).
  5. AugValuationP/E fell below the 10th percentile of its own history to date (63.0x).
  6. AugPriceVolume reached 13.1x its 50-day median on 2025-08-18; price -4.4% that day.
  7. JunPeer rankMoved into the top quartile of Retail Trade on operating margin (from the 2nd quartile).
  8. JunPriceVolume reached 15.6x its 50-day median on 2025-06-19; price -5.1% that day.
  9. AprValuationP/E fell below the 10th percentile of its own history to date (67.7x).
  10. MarPeer rankSlipped to the 2nd quartile of Retail Trade on operating margin (from the top quartile).
  11. FebPriceVolume reached 5.3x its 50-day median on 2025-02-14; price +7.5% that day.
  12. DecPromoterPromoter holding fell 3.5 pts to 51.2%.
  13. DecInstitutionsFII + DII holding rose 3.6 pts over 2 quarters to 27.9%.
  14. AugPriceVolume reached 11.9x its 50-day median on 2024-08-22; price -4.2% that day.
  15. JunPromoterPromoter holding fell 2.2 pts to 55.7%.
  16. JunResultsRevenue (TTM) reached a new high of ₹999 cr.
  17. JunPeer rankSlipped to the 2nd quartile of Retail Trade on EPS growth (from the top quartile).
  18. JunPriceVolume reached 6.3x its 50-day median on 2024-06-04; price -5.9% that day.
  19. JanDebtDebt / equity halved over 12 months to 0.19x.
  20. DecPriceVolume reached 14.9x its 50-day median on 2023-12-06; price -3.6% that day.
  21. AugPriceVolume reached 15.0x its 50-day median on 2023-08-07; price +6.6% that day.
  22. JunResultsRevenue (TTM) reached a new high of ₹789 cr.

Events are generated from the data by fixed rules.
The month shown is when the change became visible in the reported figures, assuming a 60-day lag after each quarter end; it is not an announcement date.

Where price and fundamentals disagree, market-wide Rewind the whole market to any month

Monthly history55 months · 2022-05 to 2026-11
MonthP/ERevenue (TTM)ROEROCEDebt / Equity
2026-1172.3x₹1728 cr7.0%10.0%0.2x
2026-1064.2x₹1728 cr7.2%10.0%0.2x
2026-0965.1x₹1728 cr7.2%10.0%0.2x
2026-0881.4x₹1612 cr6.5%10.0%0.2x
2026-0772.4x₹1612 cr6.5%10.0%0.2x
2026-0668.8x₹1612 cr6.5%10.0%0.2x
2026-0566.4x₹1509 cr9.9%14.0%0.3x
2026-0467.0x₹1509 cr9.9%14.0%0.3x
2026-0360.9x₹1509 cr9.9%14.0%0.3x
2026-0268.5x₹1410 cr9.7%14.0%0.3x
2026-0171.9x₹1410 cr9.7%14.0%0.3x
2025-1283.9x₹1410 cr9.7%14.0%0.3x
2025-1188.4x₹1324 cr9.4%14.0%0.3x
2025-1084.1x₹1324 cr9.4%14.0%0.3x
2025-0973.4x₹1324 cr9.4%14.0%0.3x
2025-0863.0x₹1251 cr9.8%14.0%0.3x
2025-0776.8x₹1251 cr9.8%14.0%0.3x
2025-0673.5x₹1251 cr9.8%14.0%0.3x
2025-0578.0x₹1193 cr10.6%15.0%0.2x
2025-0467.7x₹1193 cr10.6%15.0%0.2x
2025-0368.0x₹1193 cr10.6%15.0%0.2x
2025-0272.0x₹1104 cr10.3%15.0%0.2x
2025-0169.5x₹1104 cr10.3%15.0%0.2x
2024-1283.9x₹1104 cr10.3%15.0%0.2x
2024-1195.5x₹1042 cr10.1%15.0%0.2x
2024-1086.0x₹1042 cr10.1%15.0%0.2x
2024-09100.2x₹1042 cr10.1%15.0%0.2x
2024-0899.5x₹999 cr9.5%15.0%0.2x
2024-0796.3x₹999 cr9.5%15.0%0.2x
2024-0685.5x₹999 cr9.5%15.0%0.2x
2024-0599.7x₹789 cr9.5%18.0%0.2x
2024-0498.2x₹789 cr9.5%18.0%0.2x
2024-03105.7x₹789 cr9.5%18.0%0.2x
2024-02106.2x₹789 cr9.5%18.0%0.2x
2024-01102.0x₹789 cr9.5%18.0%0.2x
2023-1285.3x₹789 cr9.5%18.0%0.2x
2023-1182.4x₹789 cr9.5%18.0%0.2x
2023-1067.5x₹789 cr9.5%18.0%0.2x
2023-0971.8x₹789 cr9.5%18.0%0.2x
2023-0867.7x₹789 cr9.5%18.0%0.2x
2023-0757.7x₹789 cr9.5%18.0%0.2x
2023-0659.0x₹789 cr9.5%18.0%0.2x
2023-05106.0x₹577 cr9.9%15.0%0.7x
2023-04112.1x₹577 cr9.9%15.0%0.7x
2023-0382.9x₹577 cr9.9%15.0%0.7x
2023-0285.5x₹577 cr9.9%15.0%0.7x
2023-0186.1x₹577 cr9.9%15.0%0.7x
2022-1287.9x₹577 cr9.9%15.0%0.7x
2022-1179.3x₹577 cr9.9%15.0%0.7x
2022-1085.2x₹577 cr9.9%15.0%0.7x
2022-0984.1x₹577 cr9.9%15.0%0.7x
2022-0888.9x₹577 cr9.9%15.0%0.7x
2022-0785.4x₹577 cr9.9%15.0%0.7x
2022-0668.5x₹577 cr9.9%15.0%0.7x
2022-05325.6x₹387 cr3.2%9.0%0.9x

Methodology and data notes

Methodology

Methodology and data notes

All figures come from public exchange prices and screener.in financial statements. Quarterly and annual results are shown from 60 days after the period end, so a month never uses a result before it would plausibly have been published. Statements are the latest versions, which may include later restatements.

Sector medians, percentiles and indices use today's listed companies in the sector (survivorship bias). Prices are adjusted for splits and bonus issues; around a corporate action the fundamentals may lag the price by up to a month, and affected sections are hidden.

The return decomposition uses price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count. The reverse DCF uses a fixed 12% cost of equity, a 10-year horizon and a 15x terminal P/E, and is an illustration only. Events, flags and twins follow fixed rules and thresholds described next to each section.

Feedback