अApnaFunda

INNOVA CAPTAB LIMITED (INNOVACAP)

Health Technology · Pharmaceuticals: Major · figures to Nov '26

Quality scoreHow the business itself ranks against its sector peers on profitability, 3-year growth and leverage. 50 is the middle of the sector.52 / 100
Profitability 51Balance sheet 53
Momentum scoreHow strong the recent trend is: 3-month price change, 12-month improvement in earnings and the rise in FII + DII holding, among companies above ₹500 cr.69 / 100
Price 83Earnings 57FII/DII 67

Share price

Closing priceAdjusted for splits and bonus issues.

₹1,068.9 latest close · +11.6% over the last 90 sessions

₹1,000₹1,200Jul 3Jul 29Aug 24Sep 17Oct 14Nov 9 ₹1,000₹1,200Jul 3Sep 4Nov 9

₹1,068.9 month-end · +48.8% over 12 months

₹800₹1,000₹1,200Nov '25Jan '26Apr '26Jun '26Sep '26Nov '26 ₹800₹1,000₹1,200Nov '25May '26Nov '26

₹1,068.9 month-end · +97.4% since Dec '23

₹500₹750₹1,000Dec '23Jul '24Feb '25Sep '25Apr '26Nov '26 ₹500₹750₹1,000Dec '23Jun '25Nov '26

52-week range ₹622.00 to ₹1353.50 · 1-year volatility 37.0%

Was the rally earned?

+49%share price, 1 yearEarnings and multiple

Both mattered.

  • Per-share earnings added 21 points and the multiple added 28 points (P/E 31.7x to 39.7x).
  • The share count barely moved.
Net profit growth: +21 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+21 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: +28 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+28 ptsP/E changeShare count change: 0 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.0 ptsShare count changeShare price: +49%+49%Share priceNet profit growth: +21 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+21ProfitP/E change: +28 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+28P/EShare count change: 0 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.0SharesShare price: +49%+49%Share price
Net profit growth+21 ptsNet profit rose about 18%, which lifts the price.
P/E change+28 ptsThe P/E rose from 31.7x to 39.7x, which lifts the price.
Share count change0 ptsShare count was little changed. More shares would count against the price.
What do "pts" mean?

"pts" are percentage points of the share price return. The parts add up to the total shown for each period. Because price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count, higher profit pushes the price up, a higher P/E pushes it up, and more shares push it down.

Example: if the price rose 34% and profit growth accounts for +58 pts while a lower P/E accounts for -24 pts, then 58 - 24 = 34. The +58 is not the profit growth rate itself: it is the part of the price move that profit growth explains.

Not shown for 3 years and 5 years: earnings were negative at one end, or there is not enough history.

Net profit is trailing twelve months as reported with a 60-day lag.

Compare this with SUN PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES

How rough has the ride been?

Maximum drawdown-48.0%recovered 2026-09
1-year volatility37.0%annualised
Beta vs sector index0.923-year daily, correlation 0.35
Volume spikes7last 90 sessions, 5x the 50-day median

Drawdown from peak

0%−20%−40%20252026−46.1% 0%−20%−40%20252026−46.1%
Largest drawdowns

-48.0% (2025-01 peak to 2026-01 low, recovered 2026-09)

-24.5% (2026-09 peak to 2026-10 low, not yet recovered)

-20.5% (2024-01 peak to 2024-03 low, recovered 2024-07)

Most recent volume spikes

2026-09-30: 12.1x the 50-day median, price -8.8% that day

2026-09-23: 10.3x the 50-day median, price +5.8% that day

2026-09-04: 7.4x the 50-day median, price +4.4% that day

Beta is the slope of daily returns against a market-cap-weighted index of the sector's other listed companies, built from today's constituents (so it excludes companies no longer listed).

Is it expensive against its own past and its peers?

39.7xP/E todayWithin its usual range
Against its own history72nd percentile
CheapestMedian 37.8xDearest

Usual range 31.7x to 43.4x since 2023-12.

Against Health Technology39.7x vs 37.0x
This company
39.7x
Sector median
37.0x

7% above the Health Technology median.

25.8x35.2x44.6x53.9xDec '23Jul '24Feb '25Sep '25Apr '26Nov '2625.8x35.2x44.6x53.9xDec '23Dec '24Dec '25Nov '26
P/E (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianHealth Technology median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/B (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianHealth Technology median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/S (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianHealth Technology median
How to read this

Shaded band: 10th to 90th percentile of the company's own P/E history; dotted line: its median; orange line: sector median (companies with a positive multiple, at least 5 in the sector).

Sector figures are built from today's listed companies, so they exclude companies that are no longer listed.

All terms explained in the glossary →

How Health Technology is valued

Where does it rank among Health Technology peers?

Each cell is the company's percentile rank among its Health Technology peers (non-financial companies) that month.
Darker is better-ranked.
Rows marked ↓ are inverted (lower debt, shorter cash cycle and a lower P/E rank higher).

Where it ranks today

  • ROCE54th▲ 4 pts vs a year ago
  • Op. margin48th▲ 6 pts vs a year ago
  • Revenue growth86th▲ 17 pts vs a year ago
  • EPS growth63rdflat vs a year ago
  • Debt/equity ↓41st▲ 5 pts vs a year ago
  • Cash cycle ↓77th▲ 13 pts vs a year ago
  • P/E ↓45th▼ 5 pts vs a year ago
  • 12M momentum76th▲ 44 pts vs a year ago

Rank history

ROCE
Op. margin
Revenue growth
EPS growth
Debt/equity ↓
Cash cycle ↓
P/E ↓
12M momentum
Dec '21Jul '22Jan '23Jul '23Jan '24Jul '24Jan '25Jul '25Jan '26Jul '26Nov '26
Lower rank Higher rank Not enough data

Percentiles use today's listed companies in the sector and need at least 5 peers with a value; grey cells have too few.
ROE is computed from net profit and book value where the source does not report it.

The Health Technology sector page Watch it move against Health Technology in the Observatory

What is the price implying?

~29%annual earnings growth implied by the priceIn line with delivered growth

At normalised P/E (five-year average earnings) of 61.8x, a holder earning 12%/yr needs earnings to grow about 29.0%/yr for 10 years, then trade at 15x.

Delivered30.0%/yrEPS, last 8 fiscal years · 3-yr avg to 3-yr avg
Gap−0.9 ptsimplied minus delivered
Rank550thmost demanding of 856

Over time

Implied growth by month (solid) and delivered growth (dashed).

0%18%37% Dec 2023Nov 2026 0%18%37% Dec 2023Nov 2026

Change the assumptions

Exit P/E / return11%12%13%
12x30.8%31.9%33.1%
15x27.9%29.0%30.2%
20x24.3%25.4%26.5%

Drag a slider to test other assumptions

Implied: 29.0%/yr

“Implied growth” is what the current price would require under our stated assumptions, not what we expect. How this is calculated and the market-wide lists.

What prices imply across Health Technology The market-wide Expectations lists

Key figures

Share Priceclose 9 Nov
₹1068.90
P/E
39.7x
ROCE
15.0%
Market Cap
₹6118 cr
Revenue (TTM)
₹1749 cr
P/S
3.5x
P/B
5.6x
ROE
14.1%
Operating Margin
16.0%
Debt / Equity
0.3x
Promoter Holding
50.9%
12M Momentum
48.8%

52-week range

₹622.00₹1353.50
61% of the way from its 52-week low to its high

Price risk

1Y volatility
37.0%
Beta vs sector
1-year daily
0.98

Balance sheet & cash

Interest cover
operating profit ÷ interest
11.8x
Cash from profit, 3Y
operating cash flow ÷ net profit
0.90x
Share count, 1Y
unchanged

Are profits backed by cash?

6 of 7checks within range1 beyond a threshold
Other income reliance5%Within range

Other income as a share of pre-tax profit (trailing twelve months): 4.9%. Bands: below 15%, 15% to 35%, above 35%.

Tax rate25%Within range

Median quarterly effective tax rate over about 2.5 years: 25.0%. Bands: 15% to 35%, 5% to 15% or 35% to 50%, outside 5% to 50%.

Cash conversion0.90xWithin range

Operating cash flow divided by net profit over the last three fiscal years: 0.90x (cash from operations ₹327 cr, net profit ₹363 cr). Bands: 0.8x and above, 0.5x to 0.8x, below 0.5x.

Free cash flow1 of 5 yrsBeyond threshold

Fiscal years with positive free cash flow in the last 5: 1. Bands: at least 80% of years, 40% to 80%, below 40%.

Receivable days vs history+1 daysWithin range

Debtor days are above the median of the previous three fiscal years by 1 days (98 vs 97). Bands: under 15 days, 15 to 45, over 45.

Capital work in progress2% of fixed assetsWithin range

Capital work-in-progress is 2% of fixed assets. Bands: not rising or up to 30%; rising for three years and above 30%; rising and above 60%.

Payable days+28 days / 2 yrsWithin range

Days payable changed by +28 over two years. Bands: rise of up to 30 days; more than 30 days.

Tap a check to see how it is measured

How to read this

Each check is a named rule with fixed thresholds, not a score. Annual statements are the latest restated figures, so a past year may differ from what was originally reported.

All terms explained in the glossary →

Who has been buying and selling?

  • Over 2 years, DIIs added 9.6 pts; FIIs trimmed 3.2 pts.
  • The number of shareholders fell from 1.4 lakh to 35,881 (-74%) between Dec 2023 and Jun 2026.

Holdings, Jun '26

How each group changed

GroupDec '23Jun '26Change
Promoters50.9%50.9%0.0 pts
FIIs3.6%0.3%-3.2 pts
DIIs10.3%19.9%+9.6 pts
Public and others35.2%28.8%-6.4 pts

Number of shareholders

35,881shareholders-74% since Dec '23
32k68k1.0L1.4L Dec '23Jun '24Dec '24Jun '25Dec '25Jun '26
Dec '23: 1.4 lakh
Mar '24: 39,396
Jun '24: 35,115
Sep '24: 32,254
Dec '24: 36,692
Mar '25: 39,996
Jun '25: 41,014
Sep '25: 40,245
Dec '25: 38,691
Mar '26: 36,965
Jun '26: 35,881
32k68k1.0L1.4L Dec '23Dec '24Dec '25Jun '26
Dec '23: 1.4 lakh
Mar '24: 39,396
Jun '24: 35,115
Sep '24: 32,254
Dec '24: 36,692
Mar '25: 39,996
Jun '25: 41,014
Sep '25: 40,245
Dec '25: 38,691
Mar '26: 36,965
Jun '26: 35,881

Quarterly shareholding as reported, labelled by the quarter it covers (it becomes visible about two months later).
Shareholder counts are only available for recent quarters.

This quarter's smart-money board

What happened next to similar setups

−1.8%typical 12-month return vs the marketNot meaningfully different from the base rate
  • We found 50 past situations where a non-financial company looked like INNOVA CAPTAB LIMITED today on valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, price momentum, size and volatility.
  • Over the following 12 months the middle half of them returned −30% to +23% vs the market, against −2% for all non-financial companies in the same months.
  • The gap against the base rate (−0.3%, 80% range −8.8% to +2.5%) is within what chance and overlapping periods produce.

Where the 50 outcomes landed

−100%−50%0%+50%+100%
HIKAL · Jun 2021: −51.3% vs market
EPL · Nov 2020: −46.2% vs market
SIS · Apr 2020: −46.0% vs market
SYRMA · Aug 2023: −44.9% vs market
CAMLINFINE · Jun 2021: −42.3% vs market
BOROLTD · May 2025: −40.9% vs market
DOLLAR · Apr 2022: −39.4% vs market
RALLIS · Sep 2020: −38.7% vs market
GREENPLY · Jan 2020: −35.9% vs market
KRISHANA · Apr 2023: −33.8% vs market
SOMANYCERA · Oct 2021: −32.4% vs market
CYIENT · Dec 2023: −31.8% vs market
INDOCO · Aug 2021: −30.3% vs market
RESPONIND · Jun 2024: −28.1% vs market
JASH · Dec 2024: −26.2% vs market
SUPRAJIT · Dec 2021: −26.0% vs market
RKFORGE · Jun 2024: −25.8% vs market
GREENPANEL · Dec 2021: −22.5% vs market
GUFICBIO · May 2025: −16.5% vs market
FSL · Apr 2021: −10.4% vs market
ARTEMISMED · Apr 2025: −9.5% vs market
GREENLAM · Jun 2020: −5.0% vs market
ETHOSLTD · Jul 2024: −4.3% vs market
KKCL · May 2023: −4.1% vs market
UNOMINDA · Jan 2020: −2.2% vs market
CRAFTSMAN · Jan 2023: −1.3% vs market
SUDARSCHEM · May 2020: −1.2% vs market
VENUSPIPES · Oct 2023: −1.2% vs market
RATNAMANI · Apr 2023: −0.5% vs market
AURIONPRO · Jun 2024: +3.4% vs market
MOLDTKPAC · Jan 2020: +4.0% vs market
NH · Jul 2020: +7.8% vs market
COFORGE · Sep 2025: +9.3% vs market
AEGISLOG · Apr 2020: +11.5% vs market
BECTORFOOD · Jun 2023: +16.3% vs market
TI · Nov 2023: +19.1% vs market
IPCALAB · Jun 2025: +22.2% vs market
CCL · Feb 2022: +23.4% vs market
RADICO · Jun 2020: +24.4% vs market
TEGA · Jul 2023: +31.6% vs market
CENTURYPLY · May 2021: +33.5% vs market
ANUP · Aug 2023: +34.8% vs market
HSCL · May 2024: +35.0% vs market
GRANULES · Feb 2020: +51.1% vs market
ELGIEQUIP · Jul 2021: +57.1% vs market
ASTRAMICRO · Sep 2025: +65.4% vs market
AMBER · Apr 2020: +81.0% vs market
PGEL · Jul 2024: +93.9% vs market
TIINDIA · Apr 2020: +107.1% vs market
POLYMED · Apr 2020: +173.8% vs market
Similar setups −1.8%All companies −1.5%← worse than the marketbetter than the market →

Each dot is one past situation (hover or tap for details) · Solid dots are the closest matches, listed below · Shaded is the middle half of all companies in the same months · 2 beyond the range shown, drawn at the edge

Similar setups' median
−1.8%
All companies' median
−1.5%
Beat the market
42% vs 48%

50 past situations · 50 companies · 34 months · 2020–2025

The closest matches

CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
SUDARSCHEM
Process Industries
May 2020 20x17% +17%−22% −1%
ETHOSLTD
Retail Trade
Jul 2024 96x15% +125%−4% −4%
RADICO
Consumer Non-Durables
Jun 2020 22x18% +18%−14% +24%
TEGA
Producer Manufacturing
Jul 2023 36x21% +107%−8% +32%
HSCL
Process Industries
May 2024 67x13% +160%−15% +35%
Show the other 3 matches
CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
AMBER
Producer Manufacturing
Apr 2020 36x14% +37%−35% +81%
GREENPANEL
Non-Energy Minerals
Dec 2021 75x12% +233%−3% −23%
BECTORFOOD
Consumer Non-Durables
Jun 2023 53x21% +199%−5% +16%
How reliable is this?

Matched on P/E, P/S, ROCE, operating margin, debt/equity, interest cover, revenue growth, 12-month momentum, drawdown from 12-month high, size and volatility. Closest on: P/S, P/E and drawdown from 12-month high. One match per company and at most 7 from any one month.

Independent periods: the matches fall in 6 distinct 12-month windows. Matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, so fewer windows means less evidence.

How this is built

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to INNOVA CAPTAB LIMITED. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

Methodology

How historical analogs are built

Data as of 2026-11-09. Outcome pool: Jan 2020 to Oct 2025.

For every company we look at the situation it is in today (valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, 12-month price momentum, drawdown, size and volatility) and find past company-months that looked most like it. We then show what happened to those past situations over the following 12 months, measured against the ApnaFunda All index and against the base rate. It describes history. It does not predict anything.

What is compared

FeatureWeightNon-financialFinancial
P/E1yesyes
P/S1yes—
P/B1—yes
ROCE1yes—
operating margin1yes—
ROE1—yes
debt/equity0.75yes—
interest cover0.5yes—
revenue growth0.75yesyes
12-month momentum1yesyes
drawdown from 12-month high0.75yesyes
size0.75yesyes
volatility0.5yesyes

Weights were set by judgement before any outcome was looked at and are never tuned on results. Loss-making companies (negative P/E or net profit) are only matched with other loss-making companies. Banks, NBFCs and insurers are compared only with each other and use a different feature set. Every feature is converted, month by month, to its rank among companies in the same pool in that month, so a P/E of 30 in a hot market and a P/E of 22 in a cold one can match if both were equally expensive for their time. Only that month's data is used.

How closeness and the sample are defined

Distance is the weighted root-mean-square gap between the standardised features both companies have. A match needs at least 70% of the query's feature weight, a distance of at most 0.9, and 30 matches at minimum to be shown. We keep up to 50 matches with these exclusions: never the company itself, one match per company (its closest month), and at most 7 from any one calendar month so a single market episode cannot dominate.

Base rate

The base rate is the distribution of 12-month returns, relative to the market, of every eligible company-month in the same pool, with each month weighted to match the months the analogs came from. It answers: how did a random company do in these same months? Because matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, we also report the number of distinct 12-month windows behind a result, and a bootstrap that resamples months decides whether the analog median differs from the base rate at all. "Not meaningfully different" is the usual outcome and the page copy is written for it.

Limits you should know

  • One market period. The outcome pool covers 2020–2025 only (70 months), including the 2020 crash and the 2020–21 rally.
  • Survivorship. Only companies listed today are included. Delisted and bankrupt companies are missing, which flatters past outcomes, particularly for distressed-looking setups.
  • Price return only. Dividends are excluded, and the benchmark is an ApnaFunda market-cap-weighted index of the same listed companies, not an official index.
  • Reporting lag. Fundamentals are matched on an assumed 60-day lag after the quarter end, not on real announcement dates.
  • Pools: non-financial: 98,395 company-months from 2019 companies; financial: 5,659 company-months from 108 companies. 2349 companies currently have a result; the rest are suppressed because too few comparable situations exist.

Does it work? A walk-forward check

The walk-forward check has not been run for this build, so skill is shown as not yet measured.

Disclaimer

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to any company shown. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

What else looks like this?

Companies with the most similar financial profile today, regardless of industry.

Health Services
74%similar
ROCEP/E
Consumer Non-Durables
68%similar
market capP/E
ETHOSETHOSLTD
Retail Trade
64%similar
revenuepromoter holding
Consumer Durables
64%similar
market capP/E
KDDLKDDL
Consumer Durables
63%similar
promoter holdingmarket cap
AARTI DRUGSAARTIDRUGS
Health Technology
64%similar
debt/equitymarket cap
Health Technology
52%similar
ROCEmarket cap
Health Technology
49%similar
P/Edebt/equity

Similarity is statistical, based on reported metrics; it does not imply similar business quality or future returns.

What changed?

20 events since Jun '24

  1. SepPriceRegained the 2025-01 peak, 8 months after the low.
  2. AugValuationP/E crossed above the 90th percentile of its own history to date (43.8x).
  3. AugPriceVolume reached 17.1x its 50-day median on 2026-08-12; price -0.7% that day.
  4. JunPeer rankMoved into the 2nd quartile of Health Technology on ROCE (from the 3rd quartile).
  5. JunDividendStarted paying a dividend (payout 8% of profit).
  6. MayPriceVolume reached 29.6x its 50-day median on 2026-05-04; price +12.3% that day.
  7. AprPeer rankSlipped to the 3rd quartile of Health Technology on ROCE (from the 2nd quartile).
  8. JanPriceFell 48% from the Jan 2025 peak to the Jan 2026 low.
Show 12 earlier events
  1. JanValuationP/E fell below the 10th percentile of its own history to date (32.0x).
  2. JanPriceVolume reached 74.9x its 50-day median on 2026-01-23; price +3.6% that day.
  3. DecPriceVolume reached 15.3x its 50-day median on 2025-12-18; price +0.3% that day.
  4. JunPriceVolume reached 15.8x its 50-day median on 2025-06-13; price -4.0% that day.
  5. MarPriceVolume reached 6.2x its 50-day median on 2025-03-05; price +4.7% that day.
  6. DecDebtDebt / equity halved over 12 months to 0.29x.
  7. DecSharesShare count is up 18.8% over 12 months.
  8. NovPriceVolume reached 16.5x its 50-day median on 2024-11-08; price +10.4% that day.
  9. JulPriceVolume reached 12.1x its 50-day median on 2024-07-09; price -1.4% that day.
  10. JunInstitutionsFII + DII holding rose 8.8 pts over 1 quarter to 22.7%.
  11. JunPeer rankSlipped to the 2nd quartile of Health Technology on ROCE (from the top quartile).
  12. JunPriceVolume reached 18.9x its 50-day median on 2024-06-19; price +2.7% that day.

Events are generated from the data by fixed rules.
The month shown is when the change became visible in the reported figures, assuming a 60-day lag after each quarter end; it is not an announcement date.

Where price and fundamentals disagree, market-wide Rewind the whole market to any month

Monthly history36 months · 2023-12 to 2026-11
MonthP/ERevenue (TTM)ROEROCEDebt / Equity
2026-1139.7x₹1749 cr14.1%15.0%0.3x
2026-1038.1x₹1749 cr14.1%15.0%0.3x
2026-0943.1x₹1749 cr14.1%15.0%0.3x
2026-0843.8x₹1630 cr12.9%15.0%0.3x
2026-0739.6x₹1630 cr12.9%15.0%0.3x
2026-0639.7x₹1630 cr12.9%15.0%0.3x
2026-0536.8x₹1497 cr13.9%15.0%0.4x
2026-0432.5x₹1497 cr13.9%15.0%0.4x
2026-0329.8x₹1497 cr13.9%15.0%0.4x
2026-0230.7x₹1363 cr13.0%15.0%0.4x
2026-0132.0x₹1363 cr13.0%15.0%0.4x
2025-1233.1x₹1363 cr13.0%15.0%0.4x
2025-1131.7x₹1301 cr13.6%15.0%0.4x
2025-1036.6x₹1301 cr13.6%15.0%0.4x
2025-0937.6x₹1301 cr13.6%15.0%0.4x
2025-0840.2x₹1243 cr13.3%15.0%0.4x
2025-0740.6x₹1243 cr13.3%15.0%0.4x
2025-0638.3x₹1243 cr13.3%15.0%0.4x
2025-0539.4x₹1191 cr15.3%19.0%0.3x
2025-0439.7x₹1191 cr15.3%19.0%0.3x
2025-0339.5x₹1191 cr15.3%19.0%0.3x
2025-0235.1x₹1177 cr14.2%19.0%0.3x
2025-0148.6x₹1177 cr14.2%19.0%0.3x
2024-1253.9x₹1177 cr14.2%19.0%0.3x
2024-1152.9x₹1142 cr12.8%19.0%0.3x
2024-1040.2x₹1142 cr12.8%19.0%0.3x
2024-0940.0x₹1142 cr12.8%19.0%0.3x
2024-0836.9x₹1081 cr11.4%19.0%0.3x
2024-0735.5x₹1081 cr11.4%19.0%0.3x
2024-0628.5x₹1081 cr11.4%19.0%0.3x
2024-0533.9x₹926 cr24.5%24.0%0.9x
2024-0433.4x₹926 cr24.5%24.0%0.9x
2024-0331.7x₹926 cr24.5%24.0%0.9x
2024-0237.4x₹926 cr24.5%24.0%0.9x
2024-0136.5x₹926 cr24.5%24.0%0.9x
2023-1238.2x₹926 cr24.5%24.0%0.9x

Methodology and data notes

Methodology

Methodology and data notes

All figures come from public exchange prices and screener.in financial statements. Quarterly and annual results are shown from 60 days after the period end, so a month never uses a result before it would plausibly have been published. Statements are the latest versions, which may include later restatements.

Sector medians, percentiles and indices use today's listed companies in the sector (survivorship bias). Prices are adjusted for splits and bonus issues; around a corporate action the fundamentals may lag the price by up to a month, and affected sections are hidden.

The return decomposition uses price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count. The reverse DCF uses a fixed 12% cost of equity, a 10-year horizon and a 15x terminal P/E, and is an illustration only. Events, flags and twins follow fixed rules and thresholds described next to each section.

Feedback