अApnaFunda

MANOMAY TEX INDIA LTD (MANOMAY)

Process Industries · Textiles · figures to Nov '26

Quality scoreHow the business itself ranks against its sector peers on profitability, 3-year growth and leverage. 50 is the middle of the sector.37 / 100
Profitability 47Growth 59Balance sheet 4

Passes these screensNear 52-week high

Share price

Closing priceAdjusted for splits and bonus issues.

₹262.36 latest close · +45.9% over the last 90 sessions

₹200₹250Jul 3Jul 29Aug 24Sep 17Oct 14Nov 9 ₹200₹250Jul 3Sep 4Nov 9

₹262.36 month-end · +1.4% over 12 months

₹200₹250Nov '25Jan '26Apr '26Jun '26Sep '26Nov '26 ₹200₹250Nov '25May '26Nov '26

₹262.36 month-end · +111.9% over 3 years

₹150₹200₹250₹300Nov '23Jun '24Jan '25Sep '25Apr '26Nov '26 ₹150₹200₹250₹300Nov '23May '25Nov '26

₹262.36 month-end · +89.6% since Jan '23

₹200₹300Jan '23Oct '23Jul '24May '25Feb '26Nov '26 ₹200₹300Jan '23Dec '24Nov '26

52-week range ₹160.25 to ₹270.00 · 1-year volatility 46.8%

Was the rally earned?

+1%share price, 1 yearRoughly flat
  • The share price was roughly flat over 1 year (+1%).
  • The share count barely moved.
Net profit growth: +8 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+8 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: −7 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−7 ptsP/E changeShare count change: 0 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.0 ptsShare count changeShare price: +1%+1%Share priceNet profit growth: +8 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+8ProfitP/E change: −7 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−7P/EShare count change: 0 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.0SharesShare price: +1%+1%Share price
Net profit growth+8 ptsNet profit rose about 8%, which lifts the price.
P/E change-7 ptsThe P/E fell from 25.1x to 23.5x, which lowers the price.
Share count change0 ptsShare count was little changed. More shares would count against the price.
+112%share price, 3 yearsEarnings and multiple

Both mattered.

  • Per-share earnings added 66 points and the multiple added 46 points (P/E 17.2x to 23.5x).
  • The share count barely moved.
Net profit growth: +65 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+65 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: +46 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+46 ptsP/E changeShare count change: +1 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.+1 ptsShare count changeShare price: +112%+112%Share priceNet profit growth: +65 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+65ProfitP/E change: +46 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+46P/EShare count change: +1 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.+1SharesShare price: +112%+112%Share price
Net profit growth+65 ptsNet profit rose about 55%, which lifts the price.
P/E change+46 ptsThe P/E rose from 17.2x to 23.5x, which lifts the price.
Share count change+1 ptsShare count was little changed. More shares would count against the price.
What do "pts" mean?

"pts" are percentage points of the share price return. The parts add up to the total shown for each period. Because price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count, higher profit pushes the price up, a higher P/E pushes it up, and more shares push it down.

Example: if the price rose 34% and profit growth accounts for +58 pts while a lower P/E accounts for -24 pts, then 58 - 24 = 34. The +58 is not the profit growth rate itself: it is the part of the price move that profit growth explains.

Not shown for 5 years: earnings were negative at one end, or there is not enough history.

Net profit is trailing twelve months as reported with a 60-day lag.

Compare this with VARDHMAN TEXTILES LIMTED

How rough has the ride been?

Maximum drawdown-48.4%not yet recovered
1-year volatility46.8%annualised

Drawdown from peak

0%−20%−40%202420252026−47.7% 0%−20%−40%202420252026−47.7%
Largest drawdowns

-48.4% (2024-08 peak to 2025-08 low, not yet recovered)

-29.4% (2023-01 peak to 2023-03 low, recovered 2023-12)

-19.3% (2024-01 peak to 2024-03 low, recovered 2024-04)

Is it expensive against its own past and its peers?

23.5xP/E todayWithin its usual range
Against its own history68th percentile
CheapestMedian 21.3xDearest

Usual range 15.9x to 26.1x since 2023-01.

Against Process Industries23.5x vs 18.1x
This company
23.5x
Sector median
18.1x

30% above the Process Industries median.

13.7x22.5x31.3x40.1xJan '23Nov '23Sep '24Jul '25May '26Nov '2613.7x22.5x31.3x40.1xJan '23May '24Sep '25Nov '26
P/E (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianProcess Industries median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/B (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianProcess Industries median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/S (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianProcess Industries median
How to read this

Shaded band: 10th to 90th percentile of the company's own P/E history; dotted line: its median; orange line: sector median (companies with a positive multiple, at least 5 in the sector).

Sector figures are built from today's listed companies, so they exclude companies that are no longer listed.

All terms explained in the glossary →

How Process Industries is valued

Where does it rank among Process Industries peers?

Each cell is the company's percentile rank among its Process Industries peers (non-financial companies) that month.
Darker is better-ranked.
Rows marked ↓ are inverted (lower debt, shorter cash cycle and a lower P/E rank higher).

Where it ranks today

  • ROCE49th▼ 10 pts vs a year ago
  • Op. margin44th▼ 22 pts vs a year ago
  • Revenue growth45th▼ 29 pts vs a year ago
  • EPS growth50th▼ 13 pts vs a year ago
  • Debt/equity ↓4thflat vs a year ago
  • Cash cycle ↓26th▼ 3 pts vs a year ago
  • P/E ↓37th▼ 8 pts vs a year ago
  • 12M momentum64th▼ 25 pts vs a year ago

Rank history

ROCE
Op. margin
Revenue growth
EPS growth
Debt/equity ↓
Cash cycle ↓
P/E ↓
12M momentum
Dec '21Jul '22Jan '23Jul '23Jan '24Jul '24Jan '25Jul '25Jan '26Jul '26Nov '26
Lower rank Higher rank Not enough data

Percentiles use today's listed companies in the sector and need at least 5 peers with a value; grey cells have too few.
ROE is computed from net profit and book value where the source does not report it.

The Process Industries sector page Watch it move against Process Industries in the Observatory

What is the price implying?

~21%annual earnings growth implied by the price

At a P/E of 32.4x, the price would imply about 21.0%/yr earnings growth for 10 years under the same assumptions, but it is not ranked.

Below the ₹1,000 cr market-cap floor used for the lists.

“Implied growth” is what the current price would require under our stated assumptions, not what we expect.

What prices imply across Process Industries The market-wide Expectations lists

Key figures

Share Priceclose 9 Nov
₹262.36
P/E
23.5x
ROCE
11.0%
Market Cap
₹473 cr
Revenue (TTM)
₹744 cr
P/S
0.6x
P/B
2.8x
ROE
11.8%
Operating Margin
10.0%
Debt / Equity
2.0x
Promoter Holding
57.3%
12M Momentum
1.5%

52-week range

₹160.25₹270.00
93% of the way from its 52-week low to its high

Price risk

1Y volatility
46.8%
Beta vs sector
1-year daily
0.48

Balance sheet & cash

Interest cover
operating profit ÷ interest
1.9x
Cash from profit, 3Y
operating cash flow ÷ net profit
0.83x
Share count, 1Y
unchanged

Are profits backed by cash?

5 of 7checks within range1 beyond a threshold
Other income reliance5%Within range

Other income as a share of pre-tax profit (trailing twelve months): 5.1%. Bands: below 15%, 15% to 35%, above 35%.

Tax rate25%Within range

Median quarterly effective tax rate over about 2.5 years: 25.3%. Bands: 15% to 35%, 5% to 15% or 35% to 50%, outside 5% to 50%.

Cash conversion0.83xWithin range

Operating cash flow divided by net profit over the last three fiscal years: 0.83x (cash from operations ₹43 cr, net profit ₹52 cr). Bands: 0.8x and above, 0.5x to 0.8x, below 0.5x.

Free cash flow1 of 5 yrsBeyond threshold

Fiscal years with positive free cash flow in the last 5: 1. Bands: at least 80% of years, 40% to 80%, below 40%.

Receivable days vs history+16 daysNear threshold

Debtor days are above the median of the previous three fiscal years by 16 days (92 vs 76). Bands: under 15 days, 15 to 45, over 45.

Capital work in progress0% of fixed assetsWithin range

Capital work-in-progress is 0% of fixed assets. Bands: not rising or up to 30%; rising for three years and above 30%; rising and above 60%.

Payable days-10 days / 2 yrsWithin range

Days payable changed by -10 over two years. Bands: rise of up to 30 days; more than 30 days.

Tap a check to see how it is measured

How to read this

Each check is a named rule with fixed thresholds, not a score. Annual statements are the latest restated figures, so a past year may differ from what was originally reported.

All terms explained in the glossary →

Who has been buying and selling?

  • Over 3 years, FIIs added 1.3 pts; promoters added 1.2 pts.
  • The number of shareholders rose from 846 to 2,313 (+173%) between Sep 2023 and Jun 2026.

Holdings, Jun '26

How each group changed

GroupSep '23Jun '26Change
Promoters56.1%57.3%+1.2 pts
FIIs0.0%1.3%+1.3 pts
DIIs———
Public and others43.9%41.4%-2.5 pts

Number of shareholders

2,313shareholders+173% since Sep '23
8461k2k3k Sep '23Jun '24Dec '24Jun '25Dec '25Jun '26
Sep '23: 846
Mar '24: 2,104
Jun '24: 1,971
Sep '24: 2,353
Dec '24: 2,702
Mar '25: 2,616
Jun '25: 2,515
Sep '25: 2,509
Dec '25: 2,302
Mar '26: 2,094
Jun '26: 2,313
8461k2k3k Sep '23Dec '24Dec '25Jun '26
Sep '23: 846
Mar '24: 2,104
Jun '24: 1,971
Sep '24: 2,353
Dec '24: 2,702
Mar '25: 2,616
Jun '25: 2,515
Sep '25: 2,509
Dec '25: 2,302
Mar '26: 2,094
Jun '26: 2,313

Quarterly shareholding as reported, labelled by the quarter it covers (it becomes visible about two months later).
Shareholder counts are only available for recent quarters.

This quarter's smart-money board

What happened next to similar setups

+16.8%typical 12-month return vs the marketAbove the base rate
  • We found 50 past situations where a non-financial company looked like MANOMAY TEX INDIA LTD today on valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, price momentum, size and volatility.
  • Over the following 12 months the middle half of them returned −20% to +45% vs the market, against −5% for all non-financial companies in the same months.
  • The analogs' median sat above that base rate (gap +21.4%, 80% range +1.6% to +26.2%), but the matches cluster in only 5 distinct 12-month windows.

Where the 50 outcomes landed

−100%−50%0%+50%+100%
FILATEX · Feb 2024: −43.1% vs market
RELCHEMQ · Nov 2023: −43.0% vs market
AVADHSUGAR · Oct 2023: −41.0% vs market
ELGIRUBCO · Jul 2024: −39.3% vs market
HISARMETAL · Mar 2025: −37.7% vs market
BALPHARMA · Aug 2024: −35.6% vs market
WHEELS · Jun 2023: −33.5% vs market
INDORAMA · Jan 2022: −32.5% vs market
KHADIM · Oct 2023: −30.9% vs market
MANGLMCEM · Dec 2024: −27.2% vs market
RPSGVENT · Aug 2024: −23.0% vs market
AIROLAM · Jan 2024: −22.5% vs market
SPORTKING · Aug 2024: −20.6% vs market
RANEHOLDIN · Aug 2024: −18.3% vs market
GOACARBON · Mar 2022: −17.3% vs market
DBL · Aug 2024: −10.0% vs market
NELCAST · Jun 2025: −8.7% vs market
TBZ · Dec 2020: −7.2% vs market
MAGADSUGAR · Jun 2021: −5.6% vs market
SANGAMIND · Mar 2025: −2.1% vs market
PRECOT · Jun 2024: +0.9% vs market
PARAGMILK · May 2025: +3.1% vs market
PENIND · Nov 2024: +6.2% vs market
MUKANDLTD · Oct 2025: +7.4% vs market
INDSWFTLAB · Jul 2023: +16.0% vs market
CENTUM · Oct 2021: +17.6% vs market
JAYBARMARU · Sep 2025: +18.1% vs market
GPTINFRA · Sep 2022: +18.5% vs market
BEDMUTHA · Sep 2023: +22.3% vs market
SALASAR · Nov 2022: +24.7% vs market
INDIANHUME · Jun 2023: +25.7% vs market
PGIL · Dec 2020: +29.5% vs market
GOODLUCK · Sep 2023: +31.9% vs market
UGARSUGAR · Jun 2021: +35.2% vs market
RICOAUTO · Oct 2022: +35.6% vs market
TCPLPACK · Jun 2022: +40.0% vs market
HITECH · Feb 2021: +40.9% vs market
RAMRAT · Apr 2024: +46.4% vs market
SHIVATEX · Dec 2020: +50.3% vs market
JKTYRE · Nov 2022: +53.7% vs market
UNITEDPOLY · Mar 2025: +56.5% vs market
ASHAPURMIN · Apr 2023: +58.0% vs market
EDELWEISS · Sep 2023: +59.8% vs market
GOKEX · Oct 2021: +64.1% vs market
SURYAROSNI · Oct 2020: +71.6% vs market
COMSYN · Feb 2025: +74.9% vs market
DYNAMATECH · Mar 2021: +82.5% vs market
REMSONSIND · Jul 2023: +83.2% vs market
STEELXIND · Jun 2021: +132.3% vs market
SKIPPER · Nov 2022: +143.3% vs market
Similar setups +16.8%All companies −4.6%← worse than the marketbetter than the market →

Each dot is one past situation (hover or tap for details) · Solid dots are the closest matches, listed below · Shaded is the middle half of all companies in the same months · 2 beyond the range shown, drawn at the edge

Similar setups' median
+16.8%
All companies' median
−4.6%
Beat the market
60% vs 45%

50 past situations · 50 companies · 32 months · 2020–2025

The closest matches

CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
KHADIM
Consumer Non-Durables
Oct 2023 40x10% +37%−4% −31%
CENTUM
Electronic Technology
Oct 2021 40x8% +96%−7% +18%
COMSYN
Process Industries
Feb 2025 35x9% −7%−16% +75%
DYNAMATECH
Producer Manufacturing
Mar 2021 15x9% +104%−4% +83%
INDIANHUME
Producer Manufacturing
Jun 2023 19x12% +56%0% +26%
Show the other 3 matches
CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
TCPLPACK
Commercial Services
Jun 2022 16x14% +55%−9% +40%
REMSONSIND
Producer Manufacturing
Jul 2023 24x15% +54%0% +83%
ASHAPURMIN
Non-Energy Minerals
Apr 2023 15x12% 0%−2% +58%
How reliable is this?

Matched on P/E, P/S, ROCE, operating margin, debt/equity, interest cover, revenue growth, 12-month momentum, drawdown from 12-month high, size and volatility. Closest on: ROCE, P/S and interest cover. One match per company and at most 7 from any one month.

Independent periods: the matches fall in 5 distinct 12-month windows. Matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, so fewer windows means less evidence.

How this is built

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to MANOMAY TEX INDIA LTD. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

Methodology

How historical analogs are built

Data as of 2026-11-09. Outcome pool: Jan 2020 to Oct 2025.

For every company we look at the situation it is in today (valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, 12-month price momentum, drawdown, size and volatility) and find past company-months that looked most like it. We then show what happened to those past situations over the following 12 months, measured against the ApnaFunda All index and against the base rate. It describes history. It does not predict anything.

What is compared

FeatureWeightNon-financialFinancial
P/E1yesyes
P/S1yes—
P/B1—yes
ROCE1yes—
operating margin1yes—
ROE1—yes
debt/equity0.75yes—
interest cover0.5yes—
revenue growth0.75yesyes
12-month momentum1yesyes
drawdown from 12-month high0.75yesyes
size0.75yesyes
volatility0.5yesyes

Weights were set by judgement before any outcome was looked at and are never tuned on results. Loss-making companies (negative P/E or net profit) are only matched with other loss-making companies. Banks, NBFCs and insurers are compared only with each other and use a different feature set. Every feature is converted, month by month, to its rank among companies in the same pool in that month, so a P/E of 30 in a hot market and a P/E of 22 in a cold one can match if both were equally expensive for their time. Only that month's data is used.

How closeness and the sample are defined

Distance is the weighted root-mean-square gap between the standardised features both companies have. A match needs at least 70% of the query's feature weight, a distance of at most 0.9, and 30 matches at minimum to be shown. We keep up to 50 matches with these exclusions: never the company itself, one match per company (its closest month), and at most 7 from any one calendar month so a single market episode cannot dominate.

Base rate

The base rate is the distribution of 12-month returns, relative to the market, of every eligible company-month in the same pool, with each month weighted to match the months the analogs came from. It answers: how did a random company do in these same months? Because matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, we also report the number of distinct 12-month windows behind a result, and a bootstrap that resamples months decides whether the analog median differs from the base rate at all. "Not meaningfully different" is the usual outcome and the page copy is written for it.

Limits you should know

  • One market period. The outcome pool covers 2020–2025 only (70 months), including the 2020 crash and the 2020–21 rally.
  • Survivorship. Only companies listed today are included. Delisted and bankrupt companies are missing, which flatters past outcomes, particularly for distressed-looking setups.
  • Price return only. Dividends are excluded, and the benchmark is an ApnaFunda market-cap-weighted index of the same listed companies, not an official index.
  • Reporting lag. Fundamentals are matched on an assumed 60-day lag after the quarter end, not on real announcement dates.
  • Pools: non-financial: 98,395 company-months from 2019 companies; financial: 5,659 company-months from 108 companies. 2349 companies currently have a result; the rest are suppressed because too few comparable situations exist.

Does it work? A walk-forward check

The walk-forward check has not been run for this build, so skill is shown as not yet measured.

Disclaimer

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to any company shown. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

What changed?

18 events since Mar '23

  1. SepPeer rankSlipped to the 3rd quartile of Process Industries on operating margin (from the 2nd quartile).
  2. JunResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned positive.
  3. JunPeer rankSlipped to the 3rd quartile of Process Industries on ROCE (from the 2nd quartile).
  4. MarResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned negative.
  5. MarPeer rankSlipped to the 3rd quartile of Process Industries on EPS growth (from the 2nd quartile).
  6. SepResultsRevenue (TTM) reached a new high of ₹705 cr.
  7. SepPeer rankSlipped to the 2nd quartile of Process Industries on EPS growth (from the top quartile).
  8. AugPriceFell 48% from the Aug 2024 peak to the Aug 2025 low.
Show 10 earlier events
  1. JunPeer rankMoved into the 2nd quartile of Process Industries on ROCE (from the 3rd quartile).
  2. MarResultsRevenue (TTM) reached a new high of ₹702 cr.
  3. FebValuationP/E fell below the 10th percentile of its own history to date (16.2x).
  4. DecPeer rankMoved into the top quartile of Process Industries on EPS growth (from the 2nd quartile).
  5. JunPeer rankSlipped to the 2nd quartile of Process Industries on EPS growth (from the top quartile).
  6. JanSharesShare count is up 20.0% over 12 months.
  7. DecPriceRegained the 2023-01 peak, 9 months after the low.
  8. AugPeer rankSlipped to the 3rd quartile of Process Industries on ROCE (from the 2nd quartile).
  9. JunPeer rankMoved into the 2nd quartile of Process Industries on ROCE (from the 3rd quartile).
  10. MarPriceFell 29% from the Jan 2023 peak to the Mar 2023 low.

Events are generated from the data by fixed rules.
The month shown is when the change became visible in the reported figures, assuming a 60-day lag after each quarter end; it is not an announcement date.

Where price and fundamentals disagree, market-wide Rewind the whole market to any month

Monthly history47 months · 2023-01 to 2026-11
MonthP/ERevenue (TTM)ROEROCEDebt / Equity
2026-1123.5x₹744 cr11.8%11.0%2.0x
2026-1022.2x₹744 cr11.8%11.0%2.0x
2026-0921.5x₹744 cr11.8%11.0%2.0x
2026-0820.5x₹711 cr11.5%11.0%2.0x
2026-0719.3x₹711 cr11.5%11.0%2.0x
2026-0616.7x₹711 cr11.5%11.0%2.0x
2026-0517.7x₹686 cr12.1%13.0%2.2x
2026-0423.6x₹686 cr12.1%13.0%2.2x
2026-0323.6x₹686 cr12.1%13.0%2.2x
2026-0220.8x₹695 cr13.1%13.0%2.2x
2026-0121.1x₹695 cr13.1%13.0%2.2x
2025-1218.7x₹695 cr13.1%13.0%2.2x
2025-1125.1x₹705 cr12.6%13.0%2.2x
2025-1020.2x₹705 cr12.6%13.0%2.2x
2025-0916.5x₹705 cr12.6%13.0%2.2x
2025-0816.3x₹697 cr13.0%13.0%2.2x
2025-0715.2x₹697 cr13.0%13.0%2.2x
2025-0615.6x₹697 cr13.0%13.0%2.2x
2025-0515.3x₹702 cr15.5%10.0%2.3x
2025-0415.3x₹702 cr15.5%10.0%2.3x
2025-0315.1x₹702 cr15.5%10.0%2.3x
2025-0216.2x₹641 cr13.8%10.0%2.3x
2025-0119.7x₹641 cr13.8%10.0%2.3x
2024-1223.3x₹641 cr13.8%10.0%2.3x
2024-1122.6x₹598 cr12.2%10.0%2.3x
2024-1021.7x₹598 cr12.2%10.0%2.3x
2024-0926.0x₹598 cr12.2%10.0%2.3x
2024-0836.5x₹583 cr10.1%10.0%2.3x
2024-0740.1x₹583 cr10.1%10.0%2.3x
2024-0625.1x₹583 cr10.1%10.0%2.3x
2024-0525.4x₹699 cr11.2%13.0%1.3x
2024-0427.0x₹699 cr11.2%13.0%1.3x
2024-0323.2x₹699 cr11.2%13.0%1.3x
2024-0225.7x₹699 cr11.2%13.0%1.3x
2024-0125.6x₹699 cr11.2%13.0%1.3x
2023-1221.3x₹699 cr11.2%13.0%1.3x
2023-1117.2x₹699 cr11.2%13.0%1.3x
2023-1017.1x₹699 cr11.2%13.0%1.3x
2023-0919.0x₹699 cr11.2%13.0%1.3x
2023-0818.3x₹699 cr11.2%13.0%1.3x
2023-0718.4x₹699 cr11.2%13.0%1.3x
2023-0618.4x₹699 cr11.2%13.0%1.3x
2023-0527.4x₹590 cr11.8%11.0%2.1x
2023-0426.0x₹590 cr11.8%11.0%2.1x
2023-0322.8x₹590 cr11.8%11.0%2.1x
2023-0224.3x₹590 cr11.8%11.0%2.1x
2023-0126.4x₹590 cr11.8%11.0%2.1x

Methodology and data notes

Methodology

Methodology and data notes

All figures come from public exchange prices and screener.in financial statements. Quarterly and annual results are shown from 60 days after the period end, so a month never uses a result before it would plausibly have been published. Statements are the latest versions, which may include later restatements.

Sector medians, percentiles and indices use today's listed companies in the sector (survivorship bias). Prices are adjusted for splits and bonus issues; around a corporate action the fundamentals may lag the price by up to a month, and affected sections are hidden.

The return decomposition uses price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count. The reverse DCF uses a fixed 12% cost of equity, a 10-year horizon and a 15x terminal P/E, and is an illustration only. Events, flags and twins follow fixed rules and thresholds described next to each section.

Feedback