अApnaFunda

APEEJAY SURRENDRA PARK HOT LTD (PARKHOTELS)

Consumer Services · Hotels/Resorts/Cruise lines · figures to Nov '26

Quality scoreHow the business itself ranks against its sector peers on profitability, 3-year growth and leverage. 50 is the middle of the sector.63 / 100
Profitability 62Balance sheet 64
Momentum scoreHow strong the recent trend is: 3-month price change, 12-month improvement in earnings and the rise in FII + DII holding, among companies above ₹500 cr.23 / 100
Price 28Earnings 24FII/DII 17

Share price

Closing priceAdjusted for splits and bonus issues.

₹104.29 latest close · −16.4% over the last 90 sessions

₹100₹120Jul 3Jul 29Aug 24Sep 17Oct 14Nov 9 ₹100₹120Jul 3Sep 4Nov 9

₹104.29 month-end · −24.6% over 12 months

₹100₹120₹140Nov '25Jan '26Apr '26Jun '26Sep '26Nov '26 ₹100₹120₹140Nov '25May '26Nov '26

₹104.29 month-end · −50.5% since Feb '24

₹100₹150₹200Feb '24Sep '24Mar '25Oct '25Apr '26Nov '26 ₹100₹150₹200Feb '24Jul '25Nov '26

52-week range ₹93.20 to ₹151.29 · 1-year volatility 32.5%

Was the rally earned?

-25%share price, 1 yearEarnings-driven

Mostly earnings.

  • Per-share earnings took off 38 points, while the multiple moved less (P/E 29.8x to 34.9x).
  • The share count barely moved.
Net profit growth: −38 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).−38 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: +14 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+14 ptsP/E changeShare price: −25%−25%Share priceNet profit growth: −38 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).−38ProfitP/E change: +14 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+14P/EShare price: −25%−25%Share price
Net profit growth-38 ptsNet profit fell about 36%, which lowers the price.
P/E change+14 ptsThe P/E rose from 29.8x to 34.9x, which lifts the price.
Share count change0 ptsShare count was little changed. More shares would count against the price.
What do "pts" mean?

"pts" are percentage points of the share price return. The parts add up to the total shown for each period. Because price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count, higher profit pushes the price up, a higher P/E pushes it up, and more shares push it down.

Example: if the price rose 34% and profit growth accounts for +58 pts while a lower P/E accounts for -24 pts, then 58 - 24 = 34. The +58 is not the profit growth rate itself: it is the part of the price move that profit growth explains.

Not shown for 3 years and 5 years: earnings were negative at one end, or there is not enough history.

Net profit is trailing twelve months as reported with a 60-day lag.

Compare this with INDIAN HOTELS CO

How rough has the ride been?

Maximum drawdown-57.9%not yet recovered
1-year volatility32.5%annualised
Beta vs sector index1.153-year daily, correlation 0.59
Volume spikes0last 90 sessions, 5x the 50-day median

Drawdown from peak

0%−20%−40%−60%20252026−57.9% 0%−20%−40%−60%20252026−57.9%
Largest drawdowns

-57.9% (2024-02 peak to 2026-10 low, not yet recovered)

Beta is the slope of daily returns against a market-cap-weighted index of the sector's other listed companies, built from today's constituents (so it excludes companies no longer listed).

Is it expensive against its own past and its peers?

34.9xP/E todayWithin its usual range
Against its own history32nd percentile
CheapestMedian 40.2xDearest

Usual range 30.5x to 59.2x since 2024-02.

Against Consumer Services34.9x vs 22.4x
This company
34.9x
Sector median
22.4x

56% above the Consumer Services median.

16.8x36.8x56.7x76.6xFeb '24Sep '24Apr '25Nov '25Jun '26Nov '2616.8x36.8x56.7x76.6xFeb '24Jan '25Dec '25Nov '26
P/E (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianConsumer Services median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/B (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianConsumer Services median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/S (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianConsumer Services median
How to read this

Shaded band: 10th to 90th percentile of the company's own P/E history; dotted line: its median; orange line: sector median (companies with a positive multiple, at least 5 in the sector).

Sector figures are built from today's listed companies, so they exclude companies that are no longer listed.

All terms explained in the glossary →

How Consumer Services is valued

Where does it rank among Consumer Services peers?

Each cell is the company's percentile rank among its Consumer Services peers (non-financial companies) that month.
Darker is better-ranked.
Rows marked ↓ are inverted (lower debt, shorter cash cycle and a lower P/E rank higher).

Where it ranks today

  • ROCE52nd▼ 9 pts vs a year ago
  • Op. margin72nd▼ 5 pts vs a year ago
  • Revenue growth61stflat vs a year ago
  • EPS growth28th▼ 54 pts vs a year ago
  • Debt/equity ↓46th▼ 15 pts vs a year ago
  • Cash cycle ↓52ndflat vs a year ago
  • P/E ↓29th▼ 19 pts vs a year ago
  • 12M momentum44th▼ 7 pts vs a year ago

Rank history

ROCE
Op. margin
Revenue growth
EPS growth
Debt/equity ↓
Cash cycle ↓
P/E ↓
12M momentum
Dec '21Jul '22Jan '23Jul '23Jan '24Jul '24Jan '25Jul '25Jan '26Jul '26Nov '26
Lower rank Higher rank Not enough data

Percentiles use today's listed companies in the sector and need at least 5 peers with a value; grey cells have too few.
ROE is computed from net profit and book value where the source does not report it.

The Consumer Services sector page Watch it move against Consumer Services in the Observatory

What is the price implying?

~25%annual earnings growth implied by the price

At a P/E of 46.0x, the price would imply about 25.3%/yr earnings growth for 10 years under the same assumptions, but it is not ranked.

Fewer than six years of annual earnings are available, which is too little to measure delivered growth.

“Implied growth” is what the current price would require under our stated assumptions, not what we expect.

What prices imply across Consumer Services The market-wide Expectations lists

Key figures

Share Priceclose 9 Nov
₹104.29
P/E
34.9x
ROCE
9.0%
Market Cap
₹2226 cr
Revenue (TTM)
₹718 cr
P/S
3.1x
P/B
1.7x
ROE
4.8%
Operating Margin
28.0%
Debt / Equity
0.3x
Promoter Holding
68.2%
12M Momentum
-24.6%

52-week range

₹93.20₹151.29
19% of the way from its 52-week low to its high

Price risk

1Y volatility
32.5%
Beta vs sector
1-year daily
1.04

Balance sheet & cash

Interest cover
operating profit ÷ interest
4.4x
Cash from profit, 3Y
operating cash flow ÷ net profit
2.32x
Share count, 1Y
unchanged

Are profits backed by cash?

5 of 6checks within range1 near a threshold
Other income reliance6%Within range

Other income as a share of pre-tax profit (trailing twelve months): 6.1%. Bands: below 15%, 15% to 35%, above 35%.

Tax rate41%Near threshold

Median quarterly effective tax rate over about 2.5 years: 41.0%. Bands: 15% to 35%, 5% to 15% or 35% to 50%, outside 5% to 50%.

Cash conversion2.32xWithin range

Operating cash flow divided by net profit over the last three fiscal years: 2.32x (cash from operations ₹508 cr, net profit ₹219 cr). Bands: 0.8x and above, 0.5x to 0.8x, below 0.5x.

Free cash flow4 of 5 yrsWithin range

Fiscal years with positive free cash flow in the last 5: 4. Bands: at least 80% of years, 40% to 80%, below 40%.

Receivable days vs history-1 daysWithin range

Debtor days are below the median of the previous three fiscal years by 1 days (21 vs 22). Bands: under 15 days, 15 to 45, over 45.

Capital work in progress5% of fixed assetsWithin range

Capital work-in-progress is 5% of fixed assets. Bands: not rising or up to 30%; rising for three years and above 30%; rising and above 60%.

Payable days—Not enough data

Not enough reported data to compute this.

Tap a check to see how it is measured

How to read this

Each check is a named rule with fixed thresholds, not a score. Annual statements are the latest restated figures, so a past year may differ from what was originally reported.

All terms explained in the glossary →

Who has been buying and selling?

  • Over 2 years, DIIs trimmed 7.6 pts; FIIs trimmed 1.0 pts.
  • The number of shareholders rose from 45,763 to 50,557 (+10%) between Mar 2024 and Jun 2026.

Holdings, Jun '26

How each group changed

GroupMar '24Jun '26Change
Promoters68.1%68.2%+0.1 pts
FIIs5.1%4.1%-1.0 pts
DIIs16.4%8.8%-7.6 pts
Public and others10.3%18.9%+8.6 pts

Number of shareholders

50,557shareholders+10% since Mar '24
41k45k49k53k Mar '24Sep '24Mar '25Sep '25Mar '26Jun '26
Mar '24: 45,763
Jun '24: 44,097
Sep '24: 41,951
Dec '24: 41,246
Mar '25: 43,676
Jun '25: 46,386
Sep '25: 51,752
Dec '25: 53,059
Mar '26: 51,406
Jun '26: 50,557
41k45k49k53k Mar '24Dec '24Sep '25Jun '26
Mar '24: 45,763
Jun '24: 44,097
Sep '24: 41,951
Dec '24: 41,246
Mar '25: 43,676
Jun '25: 46,386
Sep '25: 51,752
Dec '25: 53,059
Mar '26: 51,406
Jun '26: 50,557

Quarterly shareholding as reported, labelled by the quarter it covers (it becomes visible about two months later).
Shareholder counts are only available for recent quarters.

This quarter's smart-money board

What happened next to similar setups

−4.2%typical 12-month return vs the marketNot meaningfully different from the base rate
  • We found 50 past situations where a non-financial company looked like APEEJAY SURRENDRA PARK HOT LTD today on valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, price momentum, size and volatility.
  • Over the following 12 months the middle half of them returned −22% to +19% vs the market, against −1% for all non-financial companies in the same months.
  • The gap against the base rate (−3.1%, 80% range −9.1% to +4.2%) is within what chance and overlapping periods produce.

Where the 50 outcomes landed

−100%−50%0%+50%+100%
STANLEY · Sep 2025: −53.3% vs market
SDBL · Feb 2020: −51.8% vs market
SHILPAMED · Dec 2021: −49.8% vs market
TARSONS · Feb 2025: −46.9% vs market
REPRO · Jun 2020: −42.9% vs market
XCHANGING · Feb 2025: −38.7% vs market
SHIVALIK · Nov 2023: −38.2% vs market
HERITGFOOD · Jan 2020: −36.8% vs market
KRSNAA · Oct 2025: −31.5% vs market
KRISHANA · Dec 2023: −31.3% vs market
AARTIIND · May 2024: −27.0% vs market
JAICORPLTD · Jul 2021: −26.3% vs market
5PAISA · May 2025: −22.0% vs market
DOLLAR · Jul 2023: −20.5% vs market
MATRIMONY · Aug 2023: −20.4% vs market
IMAGICAA · Oct 2025: −16.0% vs market
SHK · Feb 2020: −13.6% vs market
LUXIND · Jul 2023: −12.3% vs market
HUHTAMAKI · Jun 2020: −11.7% vs market
JYOTHYLAB · Feb 2020: −11.2% vs market
NRBBEARING · Jul 2021: −9.2% vs market
EXXARO · Oct 2022: −7.5% vs market
APLLTD · Jun 2023: −6.0% vs market
STERTOOLS · Aug 2021: −4.6% vs market
GOCLCORP · Mar 2020: −4.4% vs market
BAJAJELEC · Feb 2022: −3.9% vs market
BLISSGVS · May 2023: −1.5% vs market
ANURAS · Feb 2023: −0.8% vs market
SOMANYCERA · Jul 2022: +3.3% vs market
NILKAMAL · Jun 2022: +5.8% vs market
INDHOTEL · May 2020: +5.8% vs market
BEML · Jun 2022: +7.6% vs market
ORIENTHOT · Sep 2025: +10.9% vs market
EPL · Jul 2022: +14.1% vs market
SANSERA · Sep 2022: +15.3% vs market
BANARISUG · Jun 2021: +16.3% vs market
MIDHANI · Apr 2025: +19.0% vs market
SUPRAJIT · Jun 2020: +19.5% vs market
SINTERCOM · Mar 2020: +25.2% vs market
GUFICBIO · Oct 2025: +34.3% vs market
GREENLAM · Apr 2023: +41.2% vs market
ASHIANA · Mar 2020: +47.0% vs market
SAKAR · Feb 2025: +73.6% vs market
GANECOS · Nov 2023: +85.6% vs market
SAGCEM · Aug 2020: +85.7% vs market
CENTURYPLY · Jun 2020: +109.6% vs market
GENUSPOWER · Apr 2023: +122.2% vs market
ORCHPHARMA · Oct 2023: +122.8% vs market
BECTORFOOD · Aug 2022: +181.4% vs market
FLUOROCHEM · Feb 2021: +272.2% vs market
Similar setups −4.2%All companies −1.1%← worse than the marketbetter than the market →

Each dot is one past situation (hover or tap for details) · Solid dots are the closest matches, listed below · Shaded is the middle half of all companies in the same months · 5 beyond the range shown, drawn at the edge

Similar setups' median
−4.2%
All companies' median
−1.1%
Beat the market
44% vs 49%

50 past situations · 50 companies · 32 months · 2020–2025

The closest matches

CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
TARSONS
Process Industries
Feb 2025 47x— −35%−43% −47%
SDBL
Consumer Non-Durables
Feb 2020 18x12% −32%−42% −52%
GOCLCORP
Process Industries
Mar 2020 15x6% −59%−63% −4%
ANURAS
Health Technology
Feb 2023 43x11% −23%−29% −1%
KRSNAA
Health Services
Oct 2025 31x12% −18%−24% −32%
Show the other 3 matches
CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
SHIVALIK
Process Industries
Nov 2023 51x8% −1%−16% −38%
SAKAR
Health Technology
Feb 2025 42x7% −35%−40% +74%
NILKAMAL
Consumer Durables
Jun 2022 34x9% −14%−35% +6%
How reliable is this?

Matched on P/E, P/S, ROCE, operating margin, debt/equity, interest cover, revenue growth, 12-month momentum, drawdown from 12-month high, size and volatility. Closest on: P/E, 12-month momentum and drawdown from 12-month high. One match per company and at most 7 from any one month.

Independent periods: the matches fall in 6 distinct 12-month windows. Matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, so fewer windows means less evidence.

How this is built

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to APEEJAY SURRENDRA PARK HOT LTD. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

Methodology

How historical analogs are built

Data as of 2026-11-09. Outcome pool: Jan 2020 to Oct 2025.

For every company we look at the situation it is in today (valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, 12-month price momentum, drawdown, size and volatility) and find past company-months that looked most like it. We then show what happened to those past situations over the following 12 months, measured against the ApnaFunda All index and against the base rate. It describes history. It does not predict anything.

What is compared

FeatureWeightNon-financialFinancial
P/E1yesyes
P/S1yes—
P/B1—yes
ROCE1yes—
operating margin1yes—
ROE1—yes
debt/equity0.75yes—
interest cover0.5yes—
revenue growth0.75yesyes
12-month momentum1yesyes
drawdown from 12-month high0.75yesyes
size0.75yesyes
volatility0.5yesyes

Weights were set by judgement before any outcome was looked at and are never tuned on results. Loss-making companies (negative P/E or net profit) are only matched with other loss-making companies. Banks, NBFCs and insurers are compared only with each other and use a different feature set. Every feature is converted, month by month, to its rank among companies in the same pool in that month, so a P/E of 30 in a hot market and a P/E of 22 in a cold one can match if both were equally expensive for their time. Only that month's data is used.

How closeness and the sample are defined

Distance is the weighted root-mean-square gap between the standardised features both companies have. A match needs at least 70% of the query's feature weight, a distance of at most 0.9, and 30 matches at minimum to be shown. We keep up to 50 matches with these exclusions: never the company itself, one match per company (its closest month), and at most 7 from any one calendar month so a single market episode cannot dominate.

Base rate

The base rate is the distribution of 12-month returns, relative to the market, of every eligible company-month in the same pool, with each month weighted to match the months the analogs came from. It answers: how did a random company do in these same months? Because matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, we also report the number of distinct 12-month windows behind a result, and a bootstrap that resamples months decides whether the analog median differs from the base rate at all. "Not meaningfully different" is the usual outcome and the page copy is written for it.

Limits you should know

  • One market period. The outcome pool covers 2020–2025 only (70 months), including the 2020 crash and the 2020–21 rally.
  • Survivorship. Only companies listed today are included. Delisted and bankrupt companies are missing, which flatters past outcomes, particularly for distressed-looking setups.
  • Price return only. Dividends are excluded, and the benchmark is an ApnaFunda market-cap-weighted index of the same listed companies, not an official index.
  • Reporting lag. Fundamentals are matched on an assumed 60-day lag after the quarter end, not on real announcement dates.
  • Pools: non-financial: 98,395 company-months from 2019 companies; financial: 5,659 company-months from 108 companies. 2349 companies currently have a result; the rest are suppressed because too few comparable situations exist.

Does it work? A walk-forward check

The walk-forward check has not been run for this build, so skill is shown as not yet measured.

Disclaimer

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to any company shown. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

What else looks like this?

Companies with the most similar financial profile today, regardless of industry.

Finance
55%similar
operating margindebt/equity
Health Services
51%similar
debt/equityP/E
Process Industries
50%similar
volatilitydebt/equity
Health Services
50%similar
volatilityoperating margin
Health Technology
50%similar
revenuepromoter holding
Consumer Services
67%similar
market capdebt/equity
Consumer Services
59%similar
ROCEvolatility
Consumer Services
45%similar
promoter holdingrevenue

Similarity is statistical, based on reported metrics; it does not imply similar business quality or future returns.

What changed?

16 events since Jun '24

  1. OctPriceFell 58% from the Feb 2024 peak to the Oct 2026 low.
  2. JunResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned negative.
  3. JunPeer rankSlipped to the 2nd quartile of Consumer Services on operating margin (from the top quartile).
  4. FebValuationP/E fell below the 10th percentile of its own history to date (30.3x).
  5. JanPriceVolume reached 5.6x its 50-day median on 2026-01-02; price +1.9% that day.
  6. DecPeer rankSlipped to the 2nd quartile of Consumer Services on EPS growth (from the top quartile).
  7. SepPeer rankMoved into the top quartile of Consumer Services on EPS growth (from the 2nd quartile).
  8. JunDividendStarted paying a dividend (payout 13% of profit).
Show 8 earlier events
  1. MayPeer rankSlipped to the 2nd quartile of Consumer Services on EPS growth (from the top quartile).
  2. MarInstitutionsFII + DII holding fell 4.5 pts over 2 quarters to 15.3%.
  3. FebDebtDebt / equity halved over 12 months to 0.08x.
  4. FebSharesShare count is up 23.5% over 12 months.
  5. JanPriceVolume reached 5.1x its 50-day median on 2025-01-03; price +3.2% that day.
  6. NovPriceVolume reached 18.6x its 50-day median on 2024-11-26; price +4.8% that day.
  7. JulPriceVolume reached 7.3x its 50-day median on 2024-07-08; price +1.7% that day.
  8. JunDebtDebt / equity fell below 1.0x (0.08x).

Events are generated from the data by fixed rules.
The month shown is when the change became visible in the reported figures, assuming a 60-day lag after each quarter end; it is not an announcement date.

Where price and fundamentals disagree, market-wide Rewind the whole market to any month

Monthly history34 months · 2024-02 to 2026-11
MonthP/ERevenue (TTM)ROEROCEDebt / Equity
2026-1134.9x₹718 cr4.8%9.0%0.3x
2026-1033.2x₹718 cr4.7%9.0%0.3x
2026-0935.4x₹718 cr4.7%9.0%0.3x
2026-0836.5x₹705 cr4.8%9.0%0.3x
2026-0739.7x₹705 cr4.8%9.0%0.3x
2026-0638.9x₹705 cr4.8%9.0%0.3x
2026-0530.9x₹698 cr6.2%12.0%0.1x
2026-0432.3x₹698 cr6.2%12.0%0.1x
2026-0325.6x₹698 cr6.2%12.0%0.1x
2026-0230.3x₹675 cr6.9%12.0%0.1x
2026-0129.3x₹675 cr6.9%12.0%0.1x
2025-1232.3x₹675 cr6.9%12.0%0.1x
2025-1129.8x₹650 cr7.7%12.0%0.1x
2025-1032.5x₹650 cr7.7%12.0%0.1x
2025-0931.1x₹650 cr7.7%12.0%0.1x
2025-0838.5x₹631 cr6.5%12.0%0.1x
2025-0739.6x₹631 cr6.5%12.0%0.1x
2025-0642.2x₹631 cr6.5%12.0%0.1x
2025-0542.8x₹606 cr6.3%13.0%0.1x
2025-0442.8x₹606 cr6.3%13.0%0.1x
2025-0341.5x₹606 cr6.3%13.0%0.1x
2025-0240.6x₹588 cr5.8%13.0%0.1x
2025-0149.7x₹588 cr5.8%13.0%0.1x
2024-1251.3x₹588 cr5.8%13.0%0.1x
2024-1155.1x₹581 cr4.8%13.0%0.1x
2024-1049.9x₹581 cr4.8%13.0%0.1x
2024-0953.0x₹581 cr4.8%13.0%0.1x
2024-0846.3x₹577 cr5.7%13.0%0.1x
2024-0750.1x₹577 cr5.7%13.0%0.1x
2024-0648.1x₹577 cr5.7%13.0%0.1x
2024-0561.0x₹510 cr8.6%11.0%1.1x
2024-0471.3x₹510 cr8.6%11.0%1.1x
2024-0369.2x₹510 cr8.6%11.0%1.1x
2024-0276.6x₹510 cr8.6%11.0%1.1x

Methodology and data notes

Methodology

Methodology and data notes

All figures come from public exchange prices and screener.in financial statements. Quarterly and annual results are shown from 60 days after the period end, so a month never uses a result before it would plausibly have been published. Statements are the latest versions, which may include later restatements.

Sector medians, percentiles and indices use today's listed companies in the sector (survivorship bias). Prices are adjusted for splits and bonus issues; around a corporate action the fundamentals may lag the price by up to a month, and affected sections are hidden.

The return decomposition uses price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count. The reverse DCF uses a fixed 12% cost of equity, a 10-year horizon and a 15x terminal P/E, and is an illustration only. Events, flags and twins follow fixed rules and thresholds described next to each section.

Feedback