अApnaFunda

AFFORDABLE ROBOTIC AUTOM LTD (AFFORDABLE)

Producer Manufacturing · Industrial Machinery · figures to Nov '26

Quality scoreHow the business itself ranks against its sector peers on profitability, 3-year growth and leverage. 50 is the middle of the sector.22 / 100
Profitability 13Balance sheet 30

Passes these screensPromoters buying

Share price

Closing priceAdjusted for splits and bonus issues.

₹206.95 latest close · +18.9% over the last 90 sessions

₹160₹180₹200Jul 3Jul 29Aug 24Sep 17Oct 14Nov 9 ₹160₹180₹200Jul 3Sep 4Nov 9

₹206.95 month-end · −7.8% over 12 months

₹150₹200Nov '25Jan '26Apr '26Jun '26Sep '26Nov '26 ₹150₹200Nov '25May '26Nov '26

₹206.95 month-end · −70.1% since Oct '24

₹200₹400₹600Oct '24Mar '25Aug '25Jan '26Jun '26Nov '26 ₹200₹400₹600Oct '24Nov '25Nov '26

52-week range ₹119.71 to ₹260.10 · 1-year volatility 49.4%

How rough has the ride been?

Maximum drawdown-83.6%not yet recovered
1-year volatility49.4%annualised

Drawdown from peak

0%−25%−50%−75%20252026−82.1% 0%−25%−50%−75%20252026−82.1%
Largest drawdowns

-83.6% (2024-10 peak to 2026-03 low, not yet recovered)

Where does it rank among Producer Manufacturing peers?

Each cell is the company's percentile rank among its Producer Manufacturing peers (non-financial companies) that month.
Darker is better-ranked.
Rows marked ↓ are inverted (lower debt, shorter cash cycle and a lower P/E rank higher).

Where it ranks today

  • ROCE24th▲ 22 pts vs a year ago
  • Op. margin2ndflat vs a year ago
  • Revenue growth2nd▼ 54 pts vs a year ago
  • EPS growth75th
  • Debt/equity ↓23rd▼ 6 pts vs a year ago
  • Cash cycle ↓29th▲ 4 pts vs a year ago
  • P/E ↓35th
  • 12M momentum47th▲ 46 pts vs a year ago

Rank history

ROCE
Op. margin
Revenue growth
EPS growth
Debt/equity ↓
Cash cycle ↓
P/E ↓
12M momentum
Dec '21Jul '22Jan '23Jul '23Jan '24Jul '24Jan '25Jul '25Jan '26Jul '26Nov '26
Lower rank Higher rank Not enough data

Percentiles use today's listed companies in the sector and need at least 5 peers with a value; grey cells have too few.
ROE is computed from net profit and book value where the source does not report it.

The Producer Manufacturing sector page Watch it move against Producer Manufacturing in the Observatory

What is the price implying?

~47%annual earnings growth implied by the price

At a P/E of 223.8x, the price would imply about 46.8%/yr earnings growth for 10 years under the same assumptions, but it is not ranked.

Below the ₹1,000 cr market-cap floor used for the lists.

“Implied growth” is what the current price would require under our stated assumptions, not what we expect.

What prices imply across Producer Manufacturing The market-wide Expectations lists

Key figures

Share Priceclose 9 Nov
₹206.95
P/E
38.2x
ROCE
9.0%
Market Cap
₹263 cr
Revenue (TTM)
₹112 cr
P/S
2.4x
P/B
2.4x
ROE
6.3%
Operating Margin
-29.6%
Debt / Equity
0.6x
Promoter Holding
41.4%
12M Momentum
-7.8%

52-week range

₹119.71₹260.10
62% of the way from its 52-week low to its high

Price risk

1Y volatility
49.4%
Beta vs sector
1-year daily
1.12

Balance sheet & cash

Interest cover
operating profit ÷ interest
2.9x
Cash from profit, 3Y
operating cash flow ÷ net profit
-2.00x
low
Share count, 1Y
unchanged

Are profits backed by cash?

2 of 6checks within range3 beyond a threshold
Other income reliance18%Near threshold

Other income as a share of pre-tax profit (trailing twelve months): 17.6%. Bands: below 15%, 15% to 35%, above 35%.

Tax rate2%Beyond threshold

Median quarterly effective tax rate over about 2.5 years: 2.1%. Bands: 15% to 35%, 5% to 15% or 35% to 50%, outside 5% to 50%.

Cash conversion-4.00xBeyond threshold

Operating cash flow divided by net profit over the last three fiscal years: -4.00x (cash from operations ₹-4 cr, net profit ₹1 cr). Bands: 0.8x and above, 0.5x to 0.8x, below 0.5x.

Free cash flow0 of 5 yrsBeyond threshold

Fiscal years with positive free cash flow in the last 5: 0. Bands: at least 80% of years, 40% to 80%, below 40%.

Receivable days vs history-29 daysWithin range

Debtor days are below the median of the previous three fiscal years by 29 days (172 vs 201). Bands: under 15 days, 15 to 45, over 45.

Capital work in progress133% of fixed assetsWithin range

Capital work-in-progress is 133% of fixed assets. Bands: not rising or up to 30%; rising for three years and above 30%; rising and above 60%.

Payable days—Not enough data

Not enough reported data to compute this.

Tap a check to see how it is measured

How to read this

Each check is a named rule with fixed thresholds, not a score. Annual statements are the latest restated figures, so a past year may differ from what was originally reported.

All terms explained in the glossary →

Who has been buying and selling?

  • Over 2 years, promoters trimmed 14.2 pts; FIIs added 1.1 pts; DIIs trimmed 0.8 pts.
  • The number of shareholders rose from 6,676 to 11,495 (+72%) between Jun 2024 and Jun 2026.

Holdings, Jun '26

How each group changed

GroupJun '24Jun '26Change
Promoters55.6%41.4%-14.2 pts
FIIs0.0%1.1%+1.1 pts
DIIs0.8%0.0%-0.8 pts
Public and others43.6%57.5%+13.9 pts

Number of shareholders

11,495shareholders+72% since Jun '24
3k6k9k11k Jun '24Dec '24Jun '25Dec '25Jun '26
Jun '24: 6,676
Sep '24: 3,288
Dec '24: 4,858
Mar '25: 5,720
Jun '25: 6,676
Sep '25: 9,875
Dec '25: 10,885
Mar '26: 11,037
Jun '26: 11,495
3k6k9k11k Jun '24Mar '25Dec '25Jun '26
Jun '24: 6,676
Sep '24: 3,288
Dec '24: 4,858
Mar '25: 5,720
Jun '25: 6,676
Sep '25: 9,875
Dec '25: 10,885
Mar '26: 11,037
Jun '26: 11,495

Quarterly shareholding as reported, labelled by the quarter it covers (it becomes visible about two months later).
Shareholder counts are only available for recent quarters.

This quarter's smart-money board

What happened next to similar setups

+4.0%typical 12-month return vs the marketNot meaningfully different from the base rate
  • We found 50 past situations where a non-financial company looked like AFFORDABLE ROBOTIC AUTOM LTD today on valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, price momentum, size and volatility.
  • Over the following 12 months the middle half of them returned −27% to +41% vs the market, against 0% for all non-financial companies in the same months.
  • The gap against the base rate (+3.8%, 80% range −5.3% to +15.6%) is within what chance and overlapping periods produce.

Where the 50 outcomes landed

−100%−50%0%+50%+100%
GSLSU · Mar 2024: −54.9% vs market
RAMASTEEL · May 2025: −53.9% vs market
EXXARO · Sep 2023: −52.9% vs market
KHFM · Jul 2025: −47.5% vs market
SAKAR · Mar 2024: −44.5% vs market
RUSHIL · Sep 2025: −44.0% vs market
ZENITHSTL · Oct 2025: −41.9% vs market
MEDICAMEQ · Jun 2025: −40.0% vs market
SAGARDEEP · Feb 2020: −39.4% vs market
SURAJLTD · Aug 2025: −39.3% vs market
MITCON · Apr 2024: −38.3% vs market
SPMLINFRA · Sep 2025: −32.4% vs market
COASTCORP · Jan 2024: −27.2% vs market
KRITI · May 2023: −26.0% vs market
LIBERTSHOE · Jan 2020: −19.8% vs market
KOLTEPATIL · May 2020: −16.4% vs market
NRBBEARING · Feb 2021: −15.0% vs market
ORIENTCER · Aug 2022: −12.4% vs market
BANKA · Mar 2022: −10.1% vs market
MANINFRA · Jan 2020: −8.0% vs market
NELCAST · Dec 2020: −4.8% vs market
THEINVEST · Jan 2024: −2.5% vs market
KAKATCEM · May 2020: −0.3% vs market
KCPSUGIND · Jan 2023: +0.1% vs market
BANARISUG · Mar 2020: +1.6% vs market
TPLPLASTEH · Sep 2022: +6.3% vs market
EVEREADY · Aug 2022: +8.6% vs market
GOACARBON · Jul 2022: +11.0% vs market
NIPPOBATRY · Oct 2022: +14.0% vs market
SONAMLTD · Feb 2024: +14.2% vs market
SOFTTECH · May 2022: +20.1% vs market
KHADIM · Oct 2022: +24.7% vs market
POKARNA · Jul 2021: +26.9% vs market
KOKUYOCMLN · Apr 2023: +28.6% vs market
GREENPOWER · Jun 2023: +33.3% vs market
ARVSMART · Jul 2021: +35.6% vs market
MMFL · Feb 2021: +40.0% vs market
KCP · Dec 2020: +41.4% vs market
ALICON · Feb 2021: +52.6% vs market
TALBROAUTO · Nov 2020: +55.2% vs market
SRHHYPOLTD · Apr 2020: +61.2% vs market
ARTEMISMED · Dec 2021: +75.6% vs market
ROSSELLIND · Jun 2022: +78.2% vs market
AJMERA · Dec 2023: +108.5% vs market
ANANTRAJ · Oct 2020: +111.8% vs market
MARATHON · Sep 2021: +112.4% vs market
NEULANDLAB · Dec 2022: +149.9% vs market
SWELECTES · Jun 2023: +167.7% vs market
IGPL · Jul 2020: +181.9% vs market
SHAKTIPUMP · Sep 2023: +242.1% vs market
Similar setups +4.0%All companies +0.2%← worse than the marketbetter than the market →

Each dot is one past situation (hover or tap for details) · Solid dots are the closest matches, listed below · Shaded is the middle half of all companies in the same months · 7 beyond the range shown, drawn at the edge

Similar setups' median
+4.0%
All companies' median
+0.2%
Beat the market
54% vs 50%

50 past situations · 50 companies · 37 months · 2020–2025

The closest matches

CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
ROSSELLIND
Electronic Technology
Jun 2022 21x9% +13%−22% +78%
ARVSMART
Finance
Jul 2021 53x8% +66%−5% +36%
MANINFRA
Finance
Jan 2020 19x12% −8%−23% −8%
THEINVEST
Finance
Jan 2024 73x5% +75%−2% −3%
SOFTTECH
Technology Services
May 2022 37x7% +17%−23% +20%
Show the other 3 matches
CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
BANKA
Industrial Services
Mar 2022 38x8% +37%−13% −10%
SAGARDEEP
Non-Energy Minerals
Feb 2020 55x9% −11%−23% −39%
KAKATCEM
Non-Energy Minerals
May 2020 21x3% −30%−50% 0%
How reliable is this?

Matched on P/E, P/S, ROCE, operating margin, debt/equity, interest cover, revenue growth, 12-month momentum, drawdown from 12-month high, size and volatility. Closest on: 12-month momentum, ROCE and interest cover. One match per company and at most 7 from any one month.

Independent periods: the matches fall in 6 distinct 12-month windows. Matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, so fewer windows means less evidence.

How this is built

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to AFFORDABLE ROBOTIC AUTOM LTD. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

Methodology

How historical analogs are built

Data as of 2026-11-09. Outcome pool: Jan 2020 to Oct 2025.

For every company we look at the situation it is in today (valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, 12-month price momentum, drawdown, size and volatility) and find past company-months that looked most like it. We then show what happened to those past situations over the following 12 months, measured against the ApnaFunda All index and against the base rate. It describes history. It does not predict anything.

What is compared

FeatureWeightNon-financialFinancial
P/E1yesyes
P/S1yes—
P/B1—yes
ROCE1yes—
operating margin1yes—
ROE1—yes
debt/equity0.75yes—
interest cover0.5yes—
revenue growth0.75yesyes
12-month momentum1yesyes
drawdown from 12-month high0.75yesyes
size0.75yesyes
volatility0.5yesyes

Weights were set by judgement before any outcome was looked at and are never tuned on results. Loss-making companies (negative P/E or net profit) are only matched with other loss-making companies. Banks, NBFCs and insurers are compared only with each other and use a different feature set. Every feature is converted, month by month, to its rank among companies in the same pool in that month, so a P/E of 30 in a hot market and a P/E of 22 in a cold one can match if both were equally expensive for their time. Only that month's data is used.

How closeness and the sample are defined

Distance is the weighted root-mean-square gap between the standardised features both companies have. A match needs at least 70% of the query's feature weight, a distance of at most 0.9, and 30 matches at minimum to be shown. We keep up to 50 matches with these exclusions: never the company itself, one match per company (its closest month), and at most 7 from any one calendar month so a single market episode cannot dominate.

Base rate

The base rate is the distribution of 12-month returns, relative to the market, of every eligible company-month in the same pool, with each month weighted to match the months the analogs came from. It answers: how did a random company do in these same months? Because matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, we also report the number of distinct 12-month windows behind a result, and a bootstrap that resamples months decides whether the analog median differs from the base rate at all. "Not meaningfully different" is the usual outcome and the page copy is written for it.

Limits you should know

  • One market period. The outcome pool covers 2020–2025 only (70 months), including the 2020 crash and the 2020–21 rally.
  • Survivorship. Only companies listed today are included. Delisted and bankrupt companies are missing, which flatters past outcomes, particularly for distressed-looking setups.
  • Price return only. Dividends are excluded, and the benchmark is an ApnaFunda market-cap-weighted index of the same listed companies, not an official index.
  • Reporting lag. Fundamentals are matched on an assumed 60-day lag after the quarter end, not on real announcement dates.
  • Pools: non-financial: 98,395 company-months from 2019 companies; financial: 5,659 company-months from 108 companies. 2349 companies currently have a result; the rest are suppressed because too few comparable situations exist.

Does it work? A walk-forward check

The walk-forward check has not been run for this build, so skill is shown as not yet measured.

Disclaimer

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to any company shown. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

What changed?

14 events since Dec '24

  1. SepPromoterPromoter holding fell 2.2 pts to 41.4% (largest drop since 2026-03).
  2. SepPeer rankSlipped to the bottom quartile of Producer Manufacturing on operating margin (from the top quartile).
  3. JunPeer rankMoved into the top quartile of Producer Manufacturing on operating margin (from the 2nd quartile).
  4. MarPromoterPromoter holding fell 3.9 pts to 43.2% (largest drop since 2025-12).
  5. MarPriceFell 84% from the Oct 2024 peak to the Mar 2026 low.
  6. MarPeer rankMoved into the top quartile of Producer Manufacturing on EPS growth (from the bottom quartile).
  7. DecPromoterPromoter holding fell 8.5 pts to 47.1%.
  8. DecResultsEPS (TTM) turned positive.
Show 6 earlier events
  1. DecPeer rankMoved into the 2nd quartile of Producer Manufacturing on operating margin (from the bottom quartile).
  2. SepPeer rankSlipped to the bottom quartile of Producer Manufacturing on operating margin (from the 3rd quartile).
  3. JunResultsEPS (TTM) turned negative.
  4. JunPeer rankMoved into the 3rd quartile of Producer Manufacturing on operating margin (from the bottom quartile).
  5. MarResultsEPS (TTM) turned positive.
  6. DecResultsEPS (TTM) turned negative.

Events are generated from the data by fixed rules.
The month shown is when the change became visible in the reported figures, assuming a 60-day lag after each quarter end; it is not an announcement date.

Where price and fundamentals disagree, market-wide Rewind the whole market to any month

Monthly history26 months · 2024-10 to 2026-11
MonthP/ERevenue (TTM)ROEROCEDebt / Equity
2026-1138.2x₹112 cr6.3%9.0%0.6x
2026-1027.5x₹112 cr6.3%9.0%0.6x
2026-0931.6x₹112 cr6.3%9.0%0.6x
2026-0826.0x₹119 cr7.4%9.0%0.6x
2026-0729.2x₹119 cr7.4%9.0%0.6x
2026-0627.3x₹119 cr7.4%9.0%0.6x
2026-0543.2x₹151 cr5.0%-3.0%0.6x
2026-0444.7x₹151 cr5.0%-3.0%0.6x
2026-0330.3x₹151 cr5.0%-3.0%0.6x
2026-02132.4x₹166 cr1.7%-3.0%0.6x
2026-01125.2x₹166 cr1.7%-3.0%0.6x
2025-12149.5x₹166 cr1.7%-3.0%0.6x
2025-11—₹181 cr-17.8%-3.0%0.6x
2025-10—₹181 cr-17.8%-3.0%0.6x
2025-09—₹181 cr-17.8%-3.0%0.6x
2025-08—₹182 cr-22.2%-3.0%0.6x
2025-07—₹182 cr-22.2%-3.0%0.6x
2025-06—₹182 cr-22.2%-3.0%0.6x
2025-05130.7x₹203 cr3.4%10.0%0.4x
2025-04127.2x₹203 cr3.4%10.0%0.4x
2025-03126.3x₹203 cr3.4%10.0%0.4x
2025-02—₹183 cr-6.8%10.0%0.4x
2025-01—₹183 cr-6.8%10.0%0.4x
2024-12—₹183 cr-6.8%10.0%0.4x
2024-11112.0x₹163 cr6.3%10.0%0.4x
2024-10121.2x₹163 cr6.3%10.0%0.4x

Methodology and data notes

Methodology

Methodology and data notes

All figures come from public exchange prices and screener.in financial statements. Quarterly and annual results are shown from 60 days after the period end, so a month never uses a result before it would plausibly have been published. Statements are the latest versions, which may include later restatements.

Sector medians, percentiles and indices use today's listed companies in the sector (survivorship bias). Prices are adjusted for splits and bonus issues; around a corporate action the fundamentals may lag the price by up to a month, and affected sections are hidden.

The return decomposition uses price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count. The reverse DCF uses a fixed 12% cost of equity, a 10-year horizon and a 15x terminal P/E, and is an illustration only. Events, flags and twins follow fixed rules and thresholds described next to each section.

Feedback