अApnaFunda
Menu

SOFTTECH ENGINEERS LIMITED (SOFTTECH)

Technology Services · Packaged Software · figures to Nov '26

Quality scoreHow the business itself ranks against its sector peers on profitability, 3-year growth and leverage. 50 is the middle of the sector.57 / 100
Profitability 55Growth 51Balance sheet 65
Momentum scoreHow strong the recent trend is: 3-month price change, 12-month improvement in earnings and the rise in FII + DII holding, among companies above ₹500 cr.70 / 100
Price 69Earnings 71

Passes these screensHigh Momentum

Compare withONE 97 COMMUNICATIONS PAYTMORACLE FINANCIAL SERVICES SOFTMPHASIS

Share price

Closing priceAdjusted for splits and bonus issues.

₹428.95 latest close · −1.4% over the last 90 sessions

₹400₹450₹500Jul 3Jul 29Aug 24Sep 17Oct 14Nov 9 ₹400₹450₹500Jul 3Sep 4Nov 9

₹428.95 month-end · +23.7% over 12 months

₹200₹300₹400₹500Nov '25Jan '26Apr '26Jun '26Sep '26Nov '26 ₹200₹300₹400₹500Nov '25May '26Nov '26

₹428.95 month-end · +90.6% over 3 years

₹200₹300₹400₹500Nov '23Jun '24Jan '25Sep '25Apr '26Nov '26 ₹200₹300₹400₹500Nov '23May '25Nov '26

₹428.95 month-end · +614.9% since Jun '19

₹0₹200₹400Jun '19Dec '20Jun '22Nov '23May '25Nov '26 ₹0₹200₹400Jun '19Mar '23Nov '26

52-week range ₹215.00 to ₹545.00 · 1-year volatility 45.0%

Was the rally earned?

+24%share price, 1 yearLower P/E held it back

Mostly yes, with a catch.

  • Per-share earnings added 123 points, but investors now pay less per rupee of profit (P/E 286.7x to 117.8x), which took 99 points back.
  • The share count barely moved.
Net profit growth: +123 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+123 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: −99 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−99 ptsP/E changeShare price: +24%+24%Share priceNet profit growth: +123 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+123ProfitP/E change: −99 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−99P/EShare price: +24%+24%Share price
Net profit growth+123 ptsNet profit rose about 201%, which lifts the price.
P/E change-99 ptsThe P/E fell from 286.7x to 117.8x, which lowers the price.
Share count change0 ptsShare count was little changed. More shares would count against the price.
+91%share price, 3 yearsMultiple-driven

Partly.

  • Most of the rise came from investors paying a higher multiple (P/E 57.1x to 117.8x); per-share earnings took off 11 points.
  • The share count rose 40%.
Net profit growth: +36 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+36 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: +102 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+102 ptsP/E changeShare count change: −47 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−47 ptsShare count changeShare price: +91%+91%Share priceNet profit growth: +36 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+36ProfitP/E change: +102 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+102P/EShare count change: −47 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−47SharesShare price: +91%+91%Share price
Net profit growth+36 ptsNet profit rose about 29%, which lifts the price.
P/E change+102 ptsThe P/E rose from 57.1x to 117.8x, which lifts the price.
Share count change-47 ptsShare count rose 40%, which lowers the price.
+235%share price, 5 yearsMultiple-driven

Partly.

  • Most of the rise came from investors paying a higher multiple (P/E 44.1x to 117.8x); per-share earnings added 44 points.
  • The share count rose 56%.
Net profit growth: +130 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+130 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: +191 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+191 ptsP/E changeShare count change: −86 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−86 ptsShare count changeShare price: +235%+235%Share priceNet profit growth: +130 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+130ProfitP/E change: +191 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+191P/EShare count change: −86 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−86SharesShare price: +235%+235%Share price
Net profit growth+130 ptsNet profit rose about 95%, which lifts the price.
P/E change+191 ptsThe P/E rose from 44.1x to 117.8x, which lifts the price.
Share count change-86 ptsShare count rose 56%, which lowers the price.
What do "pts" mean?

"pts" are percentage points of the share price return. The parts add up to the total shown for each period. Because price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count, higher profit pushes the price up, a higher P/E pushes it up, and more shares push it down.

Example: if the price rose 34% and profit growth accounts for +58 pts while a lower P/E accounts for -24 pts, then 58 - 24 = 34. The +58 is not the profit growth rate itself: it is the part of the price move that profit growth explains.

Net profit is trailing twelve months as reported with a 60-day lag.

Compare this with ONE 97 COMMUNICATIONS PAYTM

How rough has the ride been?

Maximum drawdown-61.2%not yet recovered
1-year volatility45.0%annualised
Beta vs sector index0.363-year daily, correlation 0.16
Volume spikes9last 90 sessions, 5x the 50-day median

Drawdown from peak

0%−20%−40%−60%2020202120222023202420252026−58.2% 0%−20%−40%−60%2020202220242026−58.2%
Largest drawdowns

-61.2% (2024-12 peak to 2026-03 low, not yet recovered)

-55.2% (2019-11 peak to 2020-03 low, recovered 2020-10)

-35.9% (2022-04 peak to 2022-06 low, recovered 2022-09)

Most recent volume spikes

2026-11-08: 7.6x the 50-day median, price -1.3% that day

2026-09-30: 5.7x the 50-day median, price -1.9% that day

2026-09-29: 5.2x the 50-day median, price +1.6% that day

Beta is the slope of daily returns against a market-cap-weighted index of the sector's other listed companies, built from today's constituents (so it excludes companies no longer listed).

Is it expensive against its own past and its peers?

117.8xP/E todayWithin its usual range
Against its own history74th percentile
CheapestMedian 40.4xDearest

Usual range 7.8x to 249.5x since 2019-06.

Against Technology Services117.8x vs 21.1x
This company
117.8x
Sector median
21.1x

459% above the Technology Services median.

4.7x128.8x252.9x377.0xJun '19Dec '20Jun '22Dec '23Jun '25Nov '264.7x128.8x252.9x377.0xJun '19Dec '21Jun '24Nov '26
P/E (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianTechnology Services median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/B (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianTechnology Services median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/S (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianTechnology Services median
How to read this

Shaded band: 10th to 90th percentile of the company's own P/E history; dotted line: its median; orange line: sector median (companies with a positive multiple, at least 5 in the sector).

Sector figures are built from today's listed companies, so they exclude companies that are no longer listed.

All terms explained in the glossary →

How Technology Services is valued

Where does it rank among Technology Services peers?

Each cell is the company's percentile rank among its Technology Services peers (non-financial companies) that month.
Darker is better-ranked.
Rows marked ↓ are inverted (lower debt, shorter cash cycle and a lower P/E rank higher).

Where it ranks today

  • ROCE24thflat vs a year ago
  • Op. margin87thflat vs a year ago
  • Revenue growth82nd▲ 3 pts vs a year ago
  • EPS growth98th▲ 80 pts vs a year ago
  • Debt/equity ↓35th▲ 13 pts vs a year ago
  • Cash cycle ↓97thflat vs a year ago
  • P/E ↓8th▲ 4 pts vs a year ago
  • 12M momentum89th▲ 25 pts vs a year ago

Rank history

ROCE
Op. margin
Revenue growth
EPS growth
Debt/equity ↓
Cash cycle ↓
P/E ↓
12M momentum
Dec '21Jul '22Jan '23Jul '23Jan '24Jul '24Jan '25Jul '25Jan '26Jul '26Nov '26
Lower rank Higher rank Not enough data

Percentiles use today's listed companies in the sector and need at least 5 peers with a value; grey cells have too few.
ROE is computed from net profit and book value where the source does not report it.

The Technology Services sector page Watch it move against Technology Services in the Observatory

What is the price implying?

~43%annual earnings growth implied by the price

At a P/E of 176.1x, the price would imply about 43.3%/yr earnings growth for 10 years under the same assumptions, but it is not ranked.

Below the ₹1,000 cr market-cap floor used for the lists.

“Implied growth” is what the current price would require under our stated assumptions, not what we expect.

What prices imply across Technology Services The market-wide Expectations lists

Key figures

Share Priceclose 9 Nov
₹428.95
P/E
117.8x
ROCE
6.0%
Market Cap
₹595 cr
Revenue (TTM)
₹139 cr
P/S
4.3x
P/B
3.5x
ROE
2.9%
Operating Margin
27.2%
Debt / Equity
0.2x
Promoter Holding
18.9%
12M Momentum
23.6%

52-week range

₹215.00₹545.00
65% of the way from its 52-week low to its high

Price risk

1Y volatility
45.0%
Beta vs sector
1-year daily
0.34

Balance sheet & cash

Interest cover
operating profit ÷ interest
3.3x
Cash from profit, 3Y
operating cash flow ÷ net profit
5.00x
Share count, 1Y
unchanged

Are profits backed by cash?

3 of 6checks within range1 beyond a threshold
Other income reliance35%Near threshold

Other income as a share of pre-tax profit (trailing twelve months): 34.9%. Bands: below 15%, 15% to 35%, above 35%.

Tax rate44%Near threshold

Median quarterly effective tax rate over about 2.5 years: 43.9%. Bands: 15% to 35%, 5% to 15% or 35% to 50%, outside 5% to 50%.

Cash conversion8.67xWithin range

Operating cash flow divided by net profit over the last three fiscal years: 8.67x (cash from operations ₹78 cr, net profit ₹9 cr). Bands: 0.8x and above, 0.5x to 0.8x, below 0.5x.

Free cash flow0 of 5 yrsBeyond threshold

Fiscal years with positive free cash flow in the last 5: 0. Bands: at least 80% of years, 40% to 80%, below 40%.

Receivable days vs history-72 daysWithin range

Debtor days are below the median of the previous three fiscal years by 72 days (95 vs 167). Bands: under 15 days, 15 to 45, over 45.

Capital work in progress0% of fixed assetsWithin range

Capital work-in-progress is 0% of fixed assets. Bands: not rising or up to 30%; rising for three years and above 30%; rising and above 60%.

Payable days—Not enough data

Not enough reported data to compute this.

Tap a check to see how it is measured

How to read this

Each check is a named rule with fixed thresholds, not a score. Annual statements are the latest restated figures, so a past year may differ from what was originally reported.

All terms explained in the glossary →

Who has been buying and selling?

  • Over 3 years, promoters trimmed 21.5 pts.
  • The number of shareholders rose from 1,993 to 2,385 (+20%) between Sep 2023 and Jun 2026.

Holdings, Jun '26

How each group changed

GroupSep '23Jun '26Change
Promoters40.4%18.9%-21.5 pts
FIIs0.1%0.0%-0.1 pts
DIIs———
Public and others59.5%81.1%+21.7 pts

Number of shareholders

2,385shareholders+20% since Sep '23
2k2k3k3k Sep '23Mar '24Dec '24Jun '25Dec '25Jun '26
Sep '23: 1,993
Dec '23: 2,644
Mar '24: 2,155
Jun '24: 2,122
Dec '24: 2,885
Mar '25: 2,711
Jun '25: 2,873
Sep '25: 2,723
Dec '25: 2,642
Mar '26: 2,552
Jun '26: 2,385
 2k2k3k3k Sep '23Dec '24Dec '25Jun '26
Sep '23: 1,993
Dec '23: 2,644
Mar '24: 2,155
Jun '24: 2,122
Dec '24: 2,885
Mar '25: 2,711
Jun '25: 2,873
Sep '25: 2,723
Dec '25: 2,642
Mar '26: 2,552
Jun '26: 2,385

Quarterly shareholding as reported, labelled by the quarter it covers (it becomes visible about two months later).
Shareholder counts are only available for recent quarters.

This quarter's smart-money board

What happened next to similar setups

−1.6%typical 12-month return vs the marketNot meaningfully different from the base rate
  • We found 50 past situations where a non-financial company looked like SOFTTECH ENGINEERS LIMITED today on valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, price momentum, size and volatility.
  • Over the following 12 months the middle half of them returned −29% to +37% vs the market, against −3% for all non-financial companies in the same months.
  • The gap against the base rate (+1.0%, 80% range −10.3% to +12.9%) is within what chance and overlapping periods produce.

Where the 50 outcomes landed

−100%−50%0%+50%+100%
RAJTV · May 2024: −65.1% vs market
BYKE · Jun 2025: −60.1% vs market
HILTON · Oct 2023: −55.5% vs market
REPRO · Aug 2023: −50.7% vs market
SPECIALITY · Mar 2023: −44.2% vs market
SUNTECK · May 2022: −43.1% vs market
EIFFL · Mar 2020: −41.1% vs market
HGM · Mar 2021: −40.4% vs market
HESTERBIO · Nov 2024: −38.7% vs market
YUKEN · Apr 2024: −37.5% vs market
KILITCH · Jan 2022: −32.2% vs market
DREDGECORP · Mar 2021: −31.4% vs market
SKP · Oct 2025: −29.4% vs market
ORCHPHARMA · Mar 2024: −28.3% vs market
NEOGEN · Mar 2025: −26.0% vs market
BPL · Jan 2024: −21.6% vs market
TARC · Dec 2021: −18.4% vs market
MAXESTATES · May 2025: −17.2% vs market
PROZONER · May 2020: −13.7% vs market
SEAMECLTD · Mar 2024: −13.5% vs market
ASHIANA · May 2024: −11.9% vs market
PILITA · Feb 2024: −9.8% vs market
ORIENTHOT · Jun 2025: −7.4% vs market
MIDHANI · Jun 2024: −7.3% vs market
TAJGVK · Jan 2023: −2.5% vs market
TOKYOPLAST · Jun 2020: −0.8% vs market
SHILPAMED · Sep 2024: +0.3% vs market
5PAISA · May 2023: +0.9% vs market
SNOWMAN · Apr 2020: +3.8% vs market
GENESYS · Apr 2024: +8.0% vs market
STAR · Jun 2020: +13.4% vs market
NEULANDLAB · Aug 2020: +14.0% vs market
RAMCOSYS · Aug 2020: +17.6% vs market
PARAS · Jan 2025: +18.3% vs market
MURUDCERA · Nov 2022: +21.6% vs market
ASTRAMICRO · Apr 2022: +23.4% vs market
INDOCO · Aug 2020: +31.5% vs market
ETHOSLTD · May 2023: +38.4% vs market
GENUSPOWER · Jul 2023: +40.2% vs market
TEJASNET · Apr 2022: +42.0% vs market
JAICORPLTD · Oct 2022: +56.6% vs market
ARVSMART · Mar 2023: +66.2% vs market
KERNEX · Mar 2022: +77.9% vs market
ANANTRAJ · Nov 2022: +131.3% vs market
HSCL · Mar 2023: +133.0% vs market
APOLLO · Apr 2025: +136.5% vs market
PREMEXPLN · Mar 2023: +153.3% vs market
SANGHVIMOV · Mar 2023: +158.4% vs market
CARTRADE · Jul 2024: +167.6% vs market
EKC · Dec 2020: +241.5% vs market
Similar setups −1.6%All companies −2.6%← worse than the marketbetter than the market →

Each dot is one past situation (hover or tap for details) · Solid dots are the closest matches, listed below · Shaded is the middle half of all companies in the same months · 7 beyond the range shown, drawn at the edge

Similar setups' median
−1.6%
All companies' median
−2.6%
Beat the market
48% vs 47%

50 past situations · 50 companies · 35 months · 2020–2025

The closest matches

CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
SNOWMAN
Commercial Services		 Apr 2020 52x4% −8%−33% +4%
REPRO
Commercial Services		 Aug 2023 124x5% +81%−2% −51%
DREDGECORP
Transportation		 Mar 2021 188x1% +155%−15% −31%
INDOCO
Health Technology		 Aug 2020 87x6% +55%−14% +32%
KERNEX
Electronic Technology		 Mar 2022 90x4% +119%−16% +78%
Show the other 3 matches
CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
EIFFL
Consumer Non-Durables		 Mar 2020 209x4% −39%−44% −41%
PILITA
Producer Manufacturing		 Feb 2024 112x6% +108%−13% −10%
PREMEXPLN
Process Industries		 Mar 2023 82x5% +29%−22% +153%
How reliable is this?

Matched on P/E, P/S, ROCE, operating margin, debt/equity, interest cover, revenue growth, 12-month momentum, drawdown from 12-month high, size and volatility. Closest on: drawdown from 12-month high, ROCE and 12-month momentum. One match per company and at most 7 from any one month.

Independent periods: the matches fall in 6 distinct 12-month windows. Matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, so fewer windows means less evidence.

How this is built

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to SOFTTECH ENGINEERS LIMITED. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

Methodology

How historical analogs are built

Data as of 2026-11-09. Outcome pool: Jan 2020 to Oct 2025.

For every company we look at the situation it is in today (valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, 12-month price momentum, drawdown, size and volatility) and find past company-months that looked most like it. We then show what happened to those past situations over the following 12 months, measured against the ApnaFunda All index and against the base rate. It describes history. It does not predict anything.

What is compared

FeatureWeightNon-financialFinancial
P/E1yesyes
P/S1yes—
P/B1—yes
ROCE1yes—
operating margin1yes—
ROE1—yes
debt/equity0.75yes—
interest cover0.5yes—
revenue growth0.75yesyes
12-month momentum1yesyes
drawdown from 12-month high0.75yesyes
size0.75yesyes
volatility0.5yesyes

Weights were set by judgement before any outcome was looked at and are never tuned on results. Loss-making companies (negative P/E or net profit) are only matched with other loss-making companies. Banks, NBFCs and insurers are compared only with each other and use a different feature set. Every feature is converted, month by month, to its rank among companies in the same pool in that month, so a P/E of 30 in a hot market and a P/E of 22 in a cold one can match if both were equally expensive for their time. Only that month's data is used.

How closeness and the sample are defined

Distance is the weighted root-mean-square gap between the standardised features both companies have. A match needs at least 70% of the query's feature weight, a distance of at most 0.9, and 30 matches at minimum to be shown. We keep up to 50 matches with these exclusions: never the company itself, one match per company (its closest month), and at most 7 from any one calendar month so a single market episode cannot dominate.

Base rate

The base rate is the distribution of 12-month returns, relative to the market, of every eligible company-month in the same pool, with each month weighted to match the months the analogs came from. It answers: how did a random company do in these same months? Because matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, we also report the number of distinct 12-month windows behind a result, and a bootstrap that resamples months decides whether the analog median differs from the base rate at all. "Not meaningfully different" is the usual outcome and the page copy is written for it.

Limits you should know

  • One market period. The outcome pool covers 2020–2025 only (70 months), including the 2020 crash and the 2020–21 rally.
  • Survivorship. Only companies listed today are included. Delisted and bankrupt companies are missing, which flatters past outcomes, particularly for distressed-looking setups.
  • Price return only. Dividends are excluded, and the benchmark is an ApnaFunda market-cap-weighted index of the same listed companies, not an official index.
  • Reporting lag. Fundamentals are matched on an assumed 60-day lag after the quarter end, not on real announcement dates.
  • Pools: non-financial: 98,395 company-months from 2019 companies; financial: 5,659 company-months from 108 companies. 2349 companies currently have a result; the rest are suppressed because too few comparable situations exist.

Does it work? A walk-forward check

The walk-forward check has not been run for this build, so skill is shown as not yet measured.

Disclaimer

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to any company shown. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

What else looks like this?

Companies with the most similar financial profile today, regardless of industry.

ASIAN HOTELS (NORTH)ASIANHOTNR
Consumer Services
56%similar
promoter holdingROCE
TARSONS PRODUCTSTARSONS
Process Industries
52%similar
P/EROCE
TIRUPATI FORGETIRUPATIFL
Producer Manufacturing
52%similar
revenueP/E
ORISSA MINERALS DEVELOPMENT COORISSAMINE
Non-Energy Minerals
50%similar
revenueoperating margin
AVANTELAVANTEL
Electronic Technology
46%similar
P/Erevenue
GENESYS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATGENESYS
Technology Services
53%similar
debt/equitypromoter holding
MOLD-TEK TECHNOLOGIESMOLDTECH
Technology Services
45%similar
market caprevenue
AURUM PROPTECHAURUM
Technology Services
35%similar
operating marginrevenue growth

Similarity is statistical, based on reported metrics; it does not imply similar business quality or future returns.

What changed?

30 events since Jun '23

  1. NovPriceVolume reached 7.6x its 50-day median on 2026-11-08; price -1.3% that day.
  2. AugPriceVolume reached 23.7x its 50-day median on 2026-08-18; price -3.2% that day.
  3. JunResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned positive.
  4. JunPeer rankMoved into the top quartile of Technology Services on EPS growth (from the 3rd quartile).
  5. MayPriceVolume reached 25.9x its 50-day median on 2026-05-18; price -2.0% that day.
  6. MarPriceFell 61% from the Dec 2024 peak to the Mar 2026 low.
  7. MarPeer rankMoved into the 3rd quartile of Technology Services on EPS growth (from the bottom quartile).
  8. NovPriceVolume reached 6.3x its 50-day median on 2025-11-19; price +4.8% that day.
Show 22 earlier events
  1. SepPeer rankMoved into the top quartile of Technology Services on operating margin (from the 3rd quartile).
  2. JulSharesShare count is up 7.7% over 12 months.
  3. JulPriceVolume reached 11.2x its 50-day median on 2025-07-01; price +2.7% that day.
  4. JunPeer rankSlipped to the 3rd quartile of Technology Services on operating margin (from the top quartile).
  5. JunPriceVolume reached 29.9x its 50-day median on 2025-06-19; price +9.6% that day.
  6. DecPriceVolume reached 130.2x its 50-day median on 2024-12-12; price +8.1% that day.
  7. SepPromoterPromoter holding fell 11.7 pts to 20.4%.
  8. AugPriceVolume reached 18.6x its 50-day median on 2024-08-21; price +3.6% that day.
  9. JunResultsRevenue (TTM) reached a new high of ₹79 cr.
  10. JunPeer rankSlipped to the bottom quartile of Technology Services on ROCE (from the 3rd quartile).
  11. JunSharesShare count is up 30.0% over 12 months.
  12. AprPriceVolume reached 13.7x its 50-day median on 2024-04-29; price -2.8% that day.
  13. MarPromoterPromoter holding fell 8.4 pts to 32.0%.
  14. FebPriceVolume reached 14.2x its 50-day median on 2024-02-29; price +1.2% that day.
  15. OctPriceRegained the 2022-09 peak, 4 months after the low.
  16. OctPriceVolume reached 35.8x its 50-day median on 2023-10-05; price +20.0% that day.
  17. SepValuationP/E crossed above the 90th percentile of its own history to date (45.5x).
  18. SepPriceVolume reached 17.3x its 50-day median on 2023-09-01; price +4.2% that day.
  19. JunResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned negative.
  20. JunPriceFell 34% from the Sep 2022 peak to the Jun 2023 low.
  21. JunPeer rankSlipped to the 3rd quartile of Technology Services on EPS growth (from the top quartile).
  22. JunPriceVolume reached 110.8x its 50-day median on 2023-06-26; price +2.9% that day.

Events are generated from the data by fixed rules.
The month shown is when the change became visible in the reported figures, assuming a 60-day lag after each quarter end; it is not an announcement date.

Where price and fundamentals disagree, market-wide Rewind the whole market to any month

Monthly history90 months · 2019-06 to 2026-11
MonthP/ERevenue (TTM)ROEROCEDebt / Equity
2026-11117.8x₹139 cr2.9%6.0%0.2x
2026-10113.9x₹139 cr2.9%6.0%0.2x
2026-09135.6x₹139 cr2.9%6.0%0.2x
2026-08116.1x₹133 cr2.9%6.0%0.2x
2026-07116.5x₹133 cr2.9%6.0%0.2x
2026-06124.2x₹133 cr2.9%6.0%0.2x
2026-05245.6x₹117 cr1.5%4.0%0.2x
2026-04216.8x₹117 cr1.5%4.0%0.2x
2026-03116.9x₹117 cr1.5%4.0%0.2x
2026-02294.0x₹106 cr0.8%4.0%0.2x
2026-01284.7x₹106 cr0.8%4.0%0.2x
2025-12323.8x₹106 cr0.8%4.0%0.2x
2025-11286.7x₹103 cr1.0%4.0%0.2x
2025-10301.4x₹103 cr1.0%4.0%0.2x
2025-09298.9x₹103 cr1.0%4.0%0.2x
2025-08374.0x₹95 cr0.8%4.0%0.2x
2025-07362.6x₹95 cr0.8%4.0%0.2x
2025-06377.0x₹95 cr0.8%4.0%0.2x
2025-05176.8x₹87 cr2.0%6.0%0.3x
2025-04175.4x₹87 cr2.0%6.0%0.3x
2025-03177.9x₹87 cr2.0%6.0%0.3x
2025-02152.3x₹84 cr2.5%6.0%0.3x
2025-01179.3x₹84 cr2.5%6.0%0.3x
2024-12218.4x₹84 cr2.5%6.0%0.3x
2024-11129.6x₹80 cr3.1%6.0%0.3x
2024-10122.5x₹80 cr3.1%6.0%0.3x
2024-09120.6x₹80 cr3.1%6.0%0.3x
2024-08116.0x₹79 cr3.2%6.0%0.3x
2024-07115.7x₹79 cr3.2%6.0%0.3x
2024-06119.4x₹79 cr3.2%6.0%0.3x
2024-0579.1x₹65 cr3.8%8.0%0.5x
2024-0492.7x₹65 cr3.8%8.0%0.5x
2024-0375.2x₹65 cr3.8%8.0%0.5x
2024-0279.0x₹65 cr3.8%8.0%0.5x
2024-0172.5x₹65 cr3.8%8.0%0.5x
2023-1258.4x₹65 cr3.8%8.0%0.5x
2023-1157.1x₹65 cr3.8%8.0%0.5x
2023-1056.3x₹65 cr3.8%8.0%0.5x
2023-0945.5x₹65 cr3.8%8.0%0.5x
2023-0837.5x₹65 cr3.8%8.0%0.5x
2023-0737.2x₹65 cr3.8%8.0%0.5x
2023-0640.4x₹65 cr3.8%8.0%0.5x
2023-0529.4x₹57 cr5.5%8.0%0.4x
2023-0432.9x₹57 cr5.5%8.0%0.4x
2023-0330.1x₹57 cr5.5%8.0%0.4x
2023-0236.8x₹57 cr5.5%8.0%0.4x
2023-0135.7x₹57 cr5.5%8.0%0.4x
2022-1230.6x₹57 cr5.5%8.0%0.4x
2022-1130.8x₹57 cr5.5%8.0%0.4x
2022-1035.5x₹57 cr5.5%8.0%0.4x
2022-0935.9x₹57 cr5.5%8.0%0.4x
2022-0828.9x₹57 cr5.5%8.0%0.4x
2022-0724.4x₹57 cr5.5%8.0%0.4x
2022-0618.9x₹57 cr5.5%8.0%0.4x
2022-0536.6x₹42 cr3.7%7.0%0.5x
2022-0439.6x₹42 cr3.7%7.0%0.5x
2022-0335.2x₹42 cr3.7%7.0%0.5x
2022-0242.1x₹42 cr3.7%7.0%0.5x
2022-0141.4x₹42 cr3.7%7.0%0.5x
2021-1240.3x₹42 cr3.7%7.0%0.5x
2021-1144.1x₹42 cr3.7%7.0%0.5x
2021-1044.5x₹42 cr3.7%7.0%0.5x
2021-0942.2x₹42 cr3.7%7.0%0.5x
2021-0838.7x₹42 cr3.7%7.0%0.5x
2021-0737.6x₹42 cr3.7%7.0%0.5x
2021-0638.4x₹42 cr3.7%7.0%0.5x
2021-0513.2x₹58 cr8.5%13.0%0.4x
2021-0413.7x₹58 cr8.5%13.0%0.4x
2021-0315.0x₹58 cr8.5%13.0%0.4x
2021-0213.1x₹58 cr8.5%13.0%0.4x
2021-0113.1x₹58 cr8.5%13.0%0.4x
2020-1213.3x₹58 cr8.5%13.0%0.4x
2020-1112.5x₹58 cr8.5%13.0%0.4x
2020-1011.6x₹58 cr8.5%13.0%0.4x
2020-099.3x₹58 cr8.5%13.0%0.4x
2020-088.8x₹58 cr8.5%13.0%0.4x
2020-076.2x₹58 cr8.5%13.0%0.4x
2020-065.7x₹58 cr8.5%13.0%0.4x
2020-055.2x₹63 cr10.9%—0.3x
2020-044.7x₹63 cr10.9%—0.3x
2020-034.9x₹63 cr10.9%—0.3x
2020-026.5x₹63 cr10.9%—0.3x
2020-017.9x₹63 cr10.9%—0.3x
2019-128.3x₹63 cr10.9%—0.3x
2019-118.3x₹63 cr10.9%—0.3x
2019-108.4x₹63 cr10.9%—0.3x
2019-099.0x₹63 cr10.9%—0.3x
2019-087.4x₹63 cr10.9%—0.3x
2019-076.0x₹63 cr10.9%—0.3x
2019-067.6x₹63 cr10.9%—0.3x

Methodology and data notes

Methodology

Methodology and data notes

All figures come from public exchange prices and screener.in financial statements. Quarterly and annual results are shown from 60 days after the period end, so a month never uses a result before it would plausibly have been published. Statements are the latest versions, which may include later restatements.

Sector medians, percentiles and indices use today's listed companies in the sector (survivorship bias). Prices are adjusted for splits and bonus issues; around a corporate action the fundamentals may lag the price by up to a month, and affected sections are hidden.

The return decomposition uses price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count. The reverse DCF uses a fixed 12% cost of equity, a 10-year horizon and a 15x terminal P/E, and is an illustration only. Events, flags and twins follow fixed rules and thresholds described next to each section.

Feedback