अApnaFunda
Menu

MOLD-TEK TECHNOLOGIES LTD (MOLDTECH)

Technology Services · Information Technology Services · figures to Nov '26

Quality scoreHow the business itself ranks against its sector peers on profitability, 3-year growth and leverage. 50 is the middle of the sector.61 / 100
Profitability 52Growth 31Balance sheet 100
Momentum scoreHow strong the recent trend is: 3-month price change, 12-month improvement in earnings and the rise in FII + DII holding, among companies above ₹500 cr.73 / 100
Price 74Earnings 78FII/DII 68

Passes these screensHigh Momentum

Compare withTATA CONSULTANCY SERVICESINFOSYSHCL TECHNOLOGIES

Share price

Closing priceAdjusted for splits and bonus issues.

₹99.95 latest close · +48.4% over the last 90 sessions

₹60₹80₹100Jul 3Jul 29Aug 24Sep 17Oct 14Nov 9 ₹60₹80₹100Jul 3Sep 4Nov 9

₹99.95 month-end · +20.2% over 12 months

₹60₹80₹100Nov '25Jan '26Apr '26Jun '26Sep '26Nov '26 ₹60₹80₹100Nov '25May '26Nov '26

₹99.95 month-end · −22.2% over 3 years

₹50₹100Nov '23Jun '24Jan '25Sep '25Apr '26Nov '26 ₹50₹100Nov '23May '25Nov '26

₹99.95 month-end · +350.6% since Jan '19

₹0₹100₹200Jan '19Aug '20Mar '22Sep '23Apr '25Nov '26 ₹0₹100₹200Jan '19Dec '22Nov '26

52-week range ₹50.55 to ₹119.45 · 1-year volatility 51.6%

Was the rally earned?

+20%share price, 1 yearLower P/E held it back

Mostly yes, with a catch.

  • Per-share earnings added 96 points, but investors now pay less per rupee of profit (P/E 62.0x to 31.2x), which took 75 points back.
  • The share count barely moved.
Net profit growth: +96 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+96 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: −75 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−75 ptsP/E changeShare count change: 0 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.0 ptsShare count changeShare price: +20%+20%Share priceNet profit growth: +96 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+96ProfitP/E change: −75 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−75P/EShare count change: 0 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.0SharesShare price: +20%+20%Share price
Net profit growth+96 ptsNet profit rose about 140%, which lifts the price.
P/E change-75 ptsThe P/E fell from 62.0x to 31.2x, which lowers the price.
Share count change0 ptsShare count was little changed. More shares would count against the price.
-22%share price, 3 yearsEarnings-driven

Mostly earnings.

  • Per-share earnings took off 43 points, while the multiple moved less (P/E 24.8x to 31.2x).
  • The share count rose 3%.
Net profit growth: −40 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).−40 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: +20 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+20 ptsP/E changeShare count change: −2 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−2 ptsShare count changeShare price: −22%−22%Share priceNet profit growth: −40 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).−40ProfitP/E change: +20 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+20P/EShare count change: −2 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−2SharesShare price: −22%−22%Share price
Net profit growth-40 ptsNet profit fell about 37%, which lowers the price.
P/E change+20 ptsThe P/E rose from 24.8x to 31.2x, which lifts the price.
Share count change-2 ptsShare count rose 3%, which lowers the price.
+174%share price, 5 yearsEarnings and multiple

Both mattered.

  • Per-share earnings added 101 points and the multiple added 73 points (P/E 20.5x to 31.2x).
  • The share count rose 2%.
Net profit growth: +105 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+105 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: +73 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+73 ptsP/E changeShare count change: −4 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−4 ptsShare count changeShare price: +174%+174%Share priceNet profit growth: +105 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+105ProfitP/E change: +73 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+73P/EShare count change: −4 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−4SharesShare price: +174%+174%Share price
Net profit growth+105 ptsNet profit rose about 84%, which lifts the price.
P/E change+73 ptsThe P/E rose from 20.5x to 31.2x, which lifts the price.
Share count change-4 ptsShare count rose 2%, which lowers the price.
What do "pts" mean?

"pts" are percentage points of the share price return. The parts add up to the total shown for each period. Because price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count, higher profit pushes the price up, a higher P/E pushes it up, and more shares push it down.

Example: if the price rose 34% and profit growth accounts for +58 pts while a lower P/E accounts for -24 pts, then 58 - 24 = 34. The +58 is not the profit growth rate itself: it is the part of the price move that profit growth explains.

Net profit is trailing twelve months as reported with a 60-day lag.

Compare this with TATA CONSULTANCY SERVICES

How rough has the ride been?

Maximum drawdown-73.6%not yet recovered
1-year volatility51.6%annualised
Beta vs sector index0.543-year daily, correlation 0.22
Volume spikes8last 90 sessions, 5x the 50-day median

Drawdown from peak

0%−20%−40%−60%2020202120222023202420252026−72.1% 0%−20%−40%−60%2020202220242026−72.1%
Largest drawdowns

-73.6% (2023-09 peak to 2026-03 low, not yet recovered)

-50.9% (2019-05 peak to 2020-05 low, recovered 2021-06)

-38.7% (2021-07 peak to 2022-02 low, recovered 2022-04)

Most recent volume spikes

2026-08-10: 13.3x the 50-day median, price +0.4% that day

2026-08-07: 30.3x the 50-day median, price -3.6% that day

2026-08-06: 89x the 50-day median, price +19.4% that day

Beta is the slope of daily returns against a market-cap-weighted index of the sector's other listed companies, built from today's constituents (so it excludes companies no longer listed).

Is it expensive against its own past and its peers?

31.2xP/E todayWithin its usual range
Against its own history76th percentile
CheapestMedian 22.5xDearest

Usual range 11.1x to 55.6x since 2019-01.

Against Technology Services31.2x vs 21.1x
This company
31.2x
Sector median
21.1x

48% above the Technology Services median.

7.4x54.6x101.9x149.2xJan '19Aug '20Mar '22Oct '23May '25Nov '267.4x54.6x101.9x149.2xJan '19Sep '21May '24Nov '26
P/E (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianTechnology Services median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/B (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianTechnology Services median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/S (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianTechnology Services median
How to read this

Shaded band: 10th to 90th percentile of the company's own P/E history; dotted line: its median; orange line: sector median (companies with a positive multiple, at least 5 in the sector).

Sector figures are built from today's listed companies, so they exclude companies that are no longer listed.

All terms explained in the glossary →

How Technology Services is valued

Where does it rank among Technology Services peers?

Each cell is the company's percentile rank among its Technology Services peers (non-financial companies) that month.
Darker is better-ranked.
Rows marked ↓ are inverted (lower debt, shorter cash cycle and a lower P/E rank higher).

Where it ranks today

  • ROCE35thflat vs a year ago
  • Op. margin70th▲ 54 pts vs a year ago
  • Revenue growth89th▲ 75 pts vs a year ago
  • EPS growth95th▲ 78 pts vs a year ago
  • Debt/equity ↓64th▲ 5 pts vs a year ago
  • Cash cycle ↓46th▼ 28 pts vs a year ago
  • P/E ↓36th▲ 19 pts vs a year ago
  • 12M momentum86th▲ 33 pts vs a year ago

Rank history

ROCE
Op. margin
Revenue growth
EPS growth
Debt/equity ↓
Cash cycle ↓
P/E ↓
12M momentum
Dec '21Jul '22Jan '23Jul '23Jan '24Jul '24Jan '25Jul '25Jan '26Jul '26Nov '26
Lower rank Higher rank Not enough data

Percentiles use today's listed companies in the sector and need at least 5 peers with a value; grey cells have too few.
ROE is computed from net profit and book value where the source does not report it.

The Technology Services sector page Watch it move against Technology Services in the Observatory

What is the price implying?

~19%annual earnings growth implied by the price

At a P/E of 31.3x, the price would imply about 18.9%/yr earnings growth for 10 years under the same assumptions, but it is not ranked.

Below the ₹1,000 cr market-cap floor used for the lists.

“Implied growth” is what the current price would require under our stated assumptions, not what we expect.

What prices imply across Technology Services The market-wide Expectations lists

Key figures

Share Priceclose 9 Nov
₹99.95
P/E
31.2x
ROCE
10.0%
Market Cap
₹574 cr
Revenue (TTM)
₹208 cr
P/S
2.8x
P/B
4.5x
ROE
14.4%
Operating Margin
19.9%
Debt / Equity
0.0x
Promoter Holding
50.5%
12M Momentum
20.3%

52-week range

₹50.55₹119.45
72% of the way from its 52-week low to its high

Price risk

1Y volatility
51.6%
Beta vs sector
1-year daily
0.25

Balance sheet & cash

Interest cover
operating profit ÷ interest
42.1x
Cash from profit, 3Y
operating cash flow ÷ net profit
1.44x
Share count, 1Y
unchanged

Are profits backed by cash?

5 of 6checks within range1 near a threshold
Other income reliance34%Near threshold

Other income as a share of pre-tax profit (trailing twelve months): 33.8%. Bands: below 15%, 15% to 35%, above 35%.

Tax rate23%Within range

Median quarterly effective tax rate over about 2.5 years: 23.1%. Bands: 15% to 35%, 5% to 15% or 35% to 50%, outside 5% to 50%.

Cash conversion1.44xWithin range

Operating cash flow divided by net profit over the last three fiscal years: 1.44x (cash from operations ₹72 cr, net profit ₹50 cr). Bands: 0.8x and above, 0.5x to 0.8x, below 0.5x.

Free cash flow5 of 5 yrsWithin range

Fiscal years with positive free cash flow in the last 5: 5. Bands: at least 80% of years, 40% to 80%, below 40%.

Receivable days vs history+14 daysWithin range

Debtor days are above the median of the previous three fiscal years by 14 days (84 vs 70). Bands: under 15 days, 15 to 45, over 45.

Capital work in progress0% of fixed assetsWithin range

Capital work-in-progress is 0% of fixed assets. Bands: not rising or up to 30%; rising for three years and above 30%; rising and above 60%.

Payable days—Not enough data

Not enough reported data to compute this.

Tap a check to see how it is measured

How to read this

Each check is a named rule with fixed thresholds, not a score. Annual statements are the latest restated figures, so a past year may differ from what was originally reported.

All terms explained in the glossary →

Who has been buying and selling?

  • Over 3 years, promoters added 1.6 pts.

Holdings, Jun '26

How each group changed

GroupSep '23Jun '26Change
Promoters48.9%50.5%+1.6 pts
FIIs0.2%0.2%0.0 pts
DIIs0.6%0.5%-0.1 pts
Public and others50.3%48.9%-1.4 pts

Number of shareholders

34,706shareholders-4% since Sep '23
35k37k39k41k Sep '23Jun '24Mar '25Dec '25Jun '26
Sep '23: 36,150
Dec '23: 38,204
Mar '24: 40,991
Jun '24: 39,480
Sep '24: 41,395
Dec '24: 40,859
Mar '25: 41,004
Jun '25: 40,764
Sep '25: 38,805
Dec '25: 36,221
Mar '26: 35,252
Jun '26: 34,706
 35k37k39k41k Sep '23Sep '24Sep '25Jun '26
Sep '23: 36,150
Dec '23: 38,204
Mar '24: 40,991
Jun '24: 39,480
Sep '24: 41,395
Dec '24: 40,859
Mar '25: 41,004
Jun '25: 40,764
Sep '25: 38,805
Dec '25: 36,221
Mar '26: 35,252
Jun '26: 34,706

Quarterly shareholding as reported, labelled by the quarter it covers (it becomes visible about two months later).
Shareholder counts are only available for recent quarters.

This quarter's smart-money board

What happened next to similar setups

−11.7%typical 12-month return vs the marketBelow the base rate
  • We found 50 past situations where a non-financial company looked like MOLD-TEK TECHNOLOGIES LTD today on valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, price momentum, size and volatility.
  • Over the following 12 months the middle half of them returned −37% to +18% vs the market, against −5% for all non-financial companies in the same months.
  • The analogs' median sat below that base rate (gap −7.2%, 80% range −15.7% to −1.4%), but the matches cluster in only 5 distinct 12-month windows.

Where the 50 outcomes landed

−100%−50%0%+50%+100%
FROG · Nov 2024: −53.4% vs market
MOS · May 2025: −52.3% vs market
JINDRILL · Feb 2025: −51.7% vs market
COMPUSOFT · Nov 2023: −47.7% vs market
AUTOAXLES · Apr 2023: −46.9% vs market
SREEL · Dec 2023: −45.7% vs market
SHREEPUSHK · Mar 2022: −44.3% vs market
ADSL · Apr 2022: −43.8% vs market
BBL · Aug 2024: −40.2% vs market
NINSYS · Feb 2025: −39.9% vs market
SHALBY · May 2021: −39.4% vs market
EXCELINDUS · Apr 2022: −38.8% vs market
IFGLEXPOR · Jul 2021: −36.8% vs market
MOREPENLAB · Aug 2024: −36.6% vs market
IPL · Sep 2025: −36.3% vs market
SYNCOMF · Mar 2025: −35.7% vs market
NIITLTD · Dec 2021: −33.3% vs market
IVC · Dec 2021: −29.9% vs market
ADFFOODS · Feb 2025: −29.2% vs market
CHEMFAB · Sep 2022: −22.6% vs market
WINDLAS · Jul 2025: −17.7% vs market
ANTELOPUS · Jul 2024: −16.9% vs market
BOROLTD · Oct 2022: −15.8% vs market
SEMAC · Feb 2020: −13.3% vs market
CHEMBOND · Nov 2023: −13.2% vs market
MAZDA · Feb 2020: −10.3% vs market
GAEL · Nov 2020: −7.2% vs market
ORBTEXP · Jan 2023: −6.9% vs market
AIRAN · Jan 2021: −6.7% vs market
ASIANENE · Jun 2024: −5.7% vs market
VIMTALABS · Dec 2021: +2.9% vs market
NDRAUTO · Sep 2021: +10.8% vs market
DEEPINDS · May 2023: +11.1% vs market
DIFFNKG · Oct 2025: +12.9% vs market
AVTNPL · Nov 2020: +13.1% vs market
NOCIL · Jun 2021: +16.9% vs market
RADHIKAJWE · Mar 2024: +17.8% vs market
HINDCON · Nov 2023: +18.3% vs market
SESHAPAPER · Sep 2022: +21.1% vs market
ASTRAMICRO · Oct 2020: +28.3% vs market
ARVSMART · Aug 2022: +35.1% vs market
RAILTEL · Oct 2023: +35.6% vs market
KRISHIVAL · Apr 2025: +40.7% vs market
TDPOWERSYS · Jan 2022: +55.6% vs market
KABRAEXTRU · Oct 2021: +62.6% vs market
IZMO · Nov 2024: +79.2% vs market
ANUP · Feb 2024: +107.3% vs market
EIMCOELECO · Jul 2023: +185.6% vs market
HBLENGINE · Apr 2023: +208.4% vs market
BORORENEW · Feb 2020: +235.4% vs market
Similar setups −11.7%All companies −4.5%← worse than the marketbetter than the market →

Each dot is one past situation (hover or tap for details) · Solid dots are the closest matches, listed below · Shaded is the middle half of all companies in the same months · 4 beyond the range shown, drawn at the edge

Similar setups' median
−11.7%
All companies' median
−4.5%
Beat the market
40% vs 45%

50 past situations · 50 companies · 36 months · 2020–2025

The closest matches

CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
SREEL
Consumer Non-Durables		 Dec 2023 36x10% +88%−2% −46%
NDRAUTO
Producer Manufacturing		 Sep 2021 28x6% +204%−4% +11%
ANTELOPUS
Energy Minerals		 Jul 2024 36x12% +106%−3% −17%
IZMO
Technology Services		 Nov 2024 25x10% +83%−10% +79%
DIFFNKG
Producer Manufacturing		 Oct 2025 32x15% +5%−7% +13%
Show the other 3 matches
CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
IPL
Process Industries		 Sep 2025 24x13% 0%−12% −36%
AIRAN
Technology Services		 Jan 2021 35x10% +39%−7% −7%
DEEPINDS
Industrial Services		 May 2023 15x8% +66%−6% +11%
How reliable is this?

Matched on P/E, P/S, ROCE, operating margin, debt/equity, interest cover, revenue growth, 12-month momentum, drawdown from 12-month high, size and volatility. Closest on: 12-month momentum, drawdown from 12-month high and P/S. One match per company and at most 7 from any one month.

Independent periods: the matches fall in 5 distinct 12-month windows. Matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, so fewer windows means less evidence.

How this is built

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to MOLD-TEK TECHNOLOGIES LTD. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

Methodology

How historical analogs are built

Data as of 2026-11-09. Outcome pool: Jan 2020 to Oct 2025.

For every company we look at the situation it is in today (valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, 12-month price momentum, drawdown, size and volatility) and find past company-months that looked most like it. We then show what happened to those past situations over the following 12 months, measured against the ApnaFunda All index and against the base rate. It describes history. It does not predict anything.

What is compared

FeatureWeightNon-financialFinancial
P/E1yesyes
P/S1yes—
P/B1—yes
ROCE1yes—
operating margin1yes—
ROE1—yes
debt/equity0.75yes—
interest cover0.5yes—
revenue growth0.75yesyes
12-month momentum1yesyes
drawdown from 12-month high0.75yesyes
size0.75yesyes
volatility0.5yesyes

Weights were set by judgement before any outcome was looked at and are never tuned on results. Loss-making companies (negative P/E or net profit) are only matched with other loss-making companies. Banks, NBFCs and insurers are compared only with each other and use a different feature set. Every feature is converted, month by month, to its rank among companies in the same pool in that month, so a P/E of 30 in a hot market and a P/E of 22 in a cold one can match if both were equally expensive for their time. Only that month's data is used.

How closeness and the sample are defined

Distance is the weighted root-mean-square gap between the standardised features both companies have. A match needs at least 70% of the query's feature weight, a distance of at most 0.9, and 30 matches at minimum to be shown. We keep up to 50 matches with these exclusions: never the company itself, one match per company (its closest month), and at most 7 from any one calendar month so a single market episode cannot dominate.

Base rate

The base rate is the distribution of 12-month returns, relative to the market, of every eligible company-month in the same pool, with each month weighted to match the months the analogs came from. It answers: how did a random company do in these same months? Because matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, we also report the number of distinct 12-month windows behind a result, and a bootstrap that resamples months decides whether the analog median differs from the base rate at all. "Not meaningfully different" is the usual outcome and the page copy is written for it.

Limits you should know

  • One market period. The outcome pool covers 2020–2025 only (70 months), including the 2020 crash and the 2020–21 rally.
  • Survivorship. Only companies listed today are included. Delisted and bankrupt companies are missing, which flatters past outcomes, particularly for distressed-looking setups.
  • Price return only. Dividends are excluded, and the benchmark is an ApnaFunda market-cap-weighted index of the same listed companies, not an official index.
  • Reporting lag. Fundamentals are matched on an assumed 60-day lag after the quarter end, not on real announcement dates.
  • Pools: non-financial: 98,395 company-months from 2019 companies; financial: 5,659 company-months from 108 companies. 2349 companies currently have a result; the rest are suppressed because too few comparable situations exist.

Does it work? A walk-forward check

The walk-forward check has not been run for this build, so skill is shown as not yet measured.

Disclaimer

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to any company shown. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

What else looks like this?

Companies with the most similar financial profile today, regardless of industry.

LAXMI DENTALLAXMIDENTL
Health Technology
65%similar
operating margindebt/equity
SPECIALITY RESTAURANTSSPECIALITY
Consumer Services
61%similar
operating marginpromoter holding
HARDWYN INDIAHARDWYN
Distribution Services
57%similar
revenuevolatility
IRM ENERGYIRMENERGY
Energy Minerals
56%similar
promoter holdingoperating margin
ELDECO HOUSING & INDELDEHSG
Finance
55%similar
revenuerevenue growth
EXCELSOFT TECHNOLOGIESEXCELSOFT
Technology Services
57%similar
volatilityrevenue
SUBEXSUBEXLTD
Technology Services
57%similar
P/Eoperating margin
SOFTTECH ENGINEERSSOFTTECH
Technology Services
45%similar
market caprevenue

Similarity is statistical, based on reported metrics; it does not imply similar business quality or future returns.

What changed?

30 events since Jul '23

  1. SepResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned positive.
  2. SepPeer rankMoved into the 2nd quartile of Technology Services on operating margin (from the bottom quartile).
  3. AugValuationP/E crossed above the 90th percentile of its own history to date (55.7x).
  4. AugPriceVolume reached 89.0x its 50-day median on 2026-08-06; price +19.4% that day.
  5. JunResultsRevenue (TTM) reached a new high of ₹182 cr.
  6. JunPeer rankSlipped to the bottom quartile of Technology Services on operating margin (from the 3rd quartile).
  7. MayPriceVolume reached 7.9x its 50-day median on 2026-05-15; price -10.9% that day.
  8. AprValuationP/E crossed above the 90th percentile of its own history to date (58.4x).
Show 22 earlier events
  1. MarPriceFell 74% from the Sep 2023 peak to the Mar 2026 low.
  2. FebPriceVolume reached 17.5x its 50-day median on 2026-02-12; price +1.9% that day.
  3. DecPeer rankMoved into the 3rd quartile of Technology Services on operating margin (from the bottom quartile).
  4. OctPriceVolume reached 7.9x its 50-day median on 2025-10-08; price +5.8% that day.
  5. SepPriceVolume reached 17.3x its 50-day median on 2025-09-22; price +7.8% that day.
  6. JunValuationP/E crossed above the 90th percentile of its own history to date (38.1x).
  7. JunPeer rankSlipped to the 3rd quartile of Technology Services on ROCE (from the top quartile).
  8. JunPriceVolume reached 29.6x its 50-day median on 2025-06-25; price +9.0% that day.
  9. MarPeer rankSlipped to the bottom quartile of Technology Services on operating margin (from the top quartile).
  10. MarPriceVolume reached 23.4x its 50-day median on 2025-03-26; price +5.2% that day.
  11. DecPeer rankMoved into the top quartile of Technology Services on operating margin (from the 2nd quartile).
  12. DecPriceVolume reached 6.3x its 50-day median on 2024-12-11; price +2.1% that day.
  13. SepPeer rankSlipped to the 2nd quartile of Technology Services on operating margin (from the top quartile).
  14. JulPriceVolume reached 5.6x its 50-day median on 2024-07-08; price +6.3% that day.
  15. JunResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned negative.
  16. JunPeer rankSlipped to the bottom quartile of Technology Services on EPS growth (from the top quartile).
  17. AprPriceVolume reached 10.4x its 50-day median on 2024-04-01; price +20.0% that day.
  18. DecPriceVolume reached 12.0x its 50-day median on 2023-12-07; price +13.8% that day.
  19. AugPriceRegained the 2023-06 peak, 1 month after the low.
  20. AugValuationP/E crossed above the 90th percentile of its own history to date (36.2x).
  21. JulPriceFell 35% from the Jun 2023 peak to the Jul 2023 low.
  22. JulPriceVolume reached 8.7x its 50-day median on 2023-07-26; price +11.0% that day.

Events are generated from the data by fixed rules.
The month shown is when the change became visible in the reported figures, assuming a 60-day lag after each quarter end; it is not an announcement date.

Where price and fundamentals disagree, market-wide Rewind the whole market to any month

Monthly history95 months · 2019-01 to 2026-11
MonthP/ERevenue (TTM)ROEROCEDebt / Equity
2026-1131.2x₹208 cr14.4%10.0%0.0x
2026-1028.0x₹208 cr14.4%10.0%0.0x
2026-0932.2x₹208 cr14.4%10.0%0.0x
2026-0855.7x₹182 cr7.9%10.0%0.0x
2026-0743.4x₹182 cr7.9%10.0%0.0x
2026-0638.4x₹182 cr7.9%10.0%0.0x
2026-0555.6x₹156 cr5.3%11.0%0.1x
2026-0458.4x₹156 cr5.3%11.0%0.1x
2026-0347.0x₹156 cr5.3%11.0%0.1x
2026-02133.4x₹137 cr2.4%11.0%0.1x
2026-01128.5x₹137 cr2.4%11.0%0.1x
2025-12149.2x₹137 cr2.4%11.0%0.1x
2025-1162.0x₹140 cr6.5%11.0%0.1x
2025-1074.5x₹140 cr6.5%11.0%0.1x
2025-0967.6x₹140 cr6.5%11.0%0.1x
2025-0837.7x₹146 cr10.3%11.0%0.1x
2025-0735.0x₹146 cr10.3%11.0%0.1x
2025-0638.1x₹146 cr10.3%11.0%0.1x
2025-0519.3x₹158 cr16.5%31.0%0.1x
2025-0420.2x₹158 cr16.5%31.0%0.1x
2025-0321.1x₹158 cr16.5%31.0%0.1x
2025-0213.0x₹166 cr21.8%31.0%0.1x
2025-0118.8x₹166 cr21.8%31.0%0.1x
2024-1221.1x₹166 cr21.8%31.0%0.1x
2024-1122.3x₹163 cr21.9%31.0%0.1x
2024-1022.5x₹163 cr21.9%31.0%0.1x
2024-0925.1x₹163 cr21.9%31.0%0.1x
2024-0824.0x₹161 cr22.8%31.0%0.1x
2024-0726.0x₹161 cr22.8%31.0%0.1x
2024-0626.2x₹161 cr22.8%31.0%0.1x
2024-0524.0x₹147 cr27.9%42.0%0.1x
2024-0421.1x₹147 cr27.9%42.0%0.1x
2024-0317.5x₹147 cr27.9%42.0%0.1x
2024-0221.2x₹147 cr27.9%42.0%0.1x
2024-0126.1x₹147 cr27.9%42.0%0.1x
2023-1226.7x₹147 cr27.9%42.0%0.1x
2023-1124.8x₹147 cr27.9%42.0%0.1x
2023-1027.0x₹147 cr27.9%42.0%0.1x
2023-0933.6x₹147 cr27.9%42.0%0.1x
2023-0836.2x₹147 cr27.9%42.0%0.1x
2023-0726.8x₹147 cr27.9%42.0%0.1x
2023-0629.1x₹147 cr27.9%42.0%0.1x
2023-0570.6x₹98 cr17.8%26.0%0.1x
2023-0458.3x₹98 cr17.8%26.0%0.1x
2023-0351.9x₹98 cr17.8%26.0%0.1x
2023-0250.3x₹98 cr17.8%26.0%0.1x
2023-0136.8x₹98 cr17.8%26.0%0.1x
2022-1230.2x₹98 cr17.8%26.0%0.1x
2022-1121.9x₹98 cr17.8%26.0%0.1x
2022-1023.6x₹98 cr17.8%26.0%0.1x
2022-0918.8x₹98 cr17.8%26.0%0.1x
2022-0819.1x₹98 cr17.8%26.0%0.1x
2022-0720.8x₹98 cr17.8%26.0%0.1x
2022-0620.2x₹98 cr17.8%26.0%0.1x
2022-0528.1x₹83 cr16.1%24.0%0.1x
2022-0428.9x₹83 cr16.1%24.0%0.1x
2022-0322.7x₹83 cr16.1%24.0%0.1x
2022-0219.7x₹83 cr16.1%24.0%0.1x
2022-0123.1x₹83 cr16.1%24.0%0.1x
2021-1224.0x₹83 cr16.1%24.0%0.1x
2021-1120.5x₹83 cr16.1%24.0%0.1x
2021-1020.8x₹83 cr16.1%24.0%0.1x
2021-0922.1x₹83 cr16.1%24.0%0.1x
2021-0821.0x₹83 cr16.1%24.0%0.1x
2021-0725.5x₹83 cr16.1%24.0%0.1x
2021-0620.1x₹83 cr16.1%24.0%0.1x
2021-0515.2x₹101 cr21.2%27.0%0.1x
2021-0412.0x₹101 cr21.2%27.0%0.1x
2021-0310.6x₹101 cr21.2%27.0%0.1x
2021-0211.0x₹101 cr21.2%27.0%0.1x
2021-0112.3x₹101 cr21.2%27.0%0.1x
2020-1213.9x₹101 cr21.2%27.0%0.1x
2020-1112.4x₹101 cr21.2%27.0%0.1x
2020-1014.1x₹101 cr21.2%27.0%0.1x
2020-0910.6x₹101 cr21.2%27.0%0.1x
2020-0811.0x₹101 cr21.2%27.0%0.1x
2020-078.5x₹101 cr21.2%27.0%0.1x
2020-069.5x₹101 cr21.2%27.0%0.1x
2020-057.5x₹89 cr23.5%36.0%0.1x
2020-048.2x₹89 cr23.5%36.0%0.1x
2020-038.1x₹89 cr23.5%36.0%0.1x
2020-0210.4x₹89 cr23.5%36.0%0.1x
2020-0111.2x₹89 cr23.5%36.0%0.1x
2019-1211.4x₹89 cr23.5%36.0%0.1x
2019-1111.7x₹89 cr23.5%36.0%0.1x
2019-1011.8x₹89 cr23.5%36.0%0.1x
2019-0912.3x₹89 cr23.5%36.0%0.1x
2019-0811.4x₹89 cr23.5%36.0%0.1x
2019-0711.6x₹89 cr23.5%36.0%0.1x
2019-0612.6x₹89 cr23.5%36.0%0.1x
2019-0528.1x₹74 cr15.0%17.0%0.1x
2019-0423.8x₹74 cr15.0%17.0%0.1x
2019-0322.7x₹74 cr15.0%17.0%0.1x
2019-0220.9x₹74 cr15.0%17.0%0.1x
2019-0122.0x₹74 cr15.0%17.0%0.1x

Methodology and data notes

Methodology

Methodology and data notes

All figures come from public exchange prices and screener.in financial statements. Quarterly and annual results are shown from 60 days after the period end, so a month never uses a result before it would plausibly have been published. Statements are the latest versions, which may include later restatements.

Sector medians, percentiles and indices use today's listed companies in the sector (survivorship bias). Prices are adjusted for splits and bonus issues; around a corporate action the fundamentals may lag the price by up to a month, and affected sections are hidden.

The return decomposition uses price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count. The reverse DCF uses a fixed 12% cost of equity, a 10-year horizon and a 15x terminal P/E, and is an illustration only. Events, flags and twins follow fixed rules and thresholds described next to each section.

Feedback