अApnaFunda

IRM ENERGY LIMITED (IRMENERGY)

Energy Minerals · Integrated Oil · figures to Nov '26

Quality scoreHow the business itself ranks against its sector peers on profitability, 3-year growth and leverage. 50 is the middle of the sector.60 / 100
Profitability 42Growth 39Balance sheet 100
Momentum scoreHow strong the recent trend is: 3-month price change, 12-month improvement in earnings and the rise in FII + DII holding, among companies above ₹500 cr.42 / 100
Price 37Earnings 82FII/DII 7

Passes these screensBusiness ahead of price

Share price

Closing priceAdjusted for splits and bonus issues.

₹262.7 latest close · −3.3% over the last 90 sessions

₹225₹250₹275₹300Jul 3Jul 29Aug 24Sep 17Oct 14Nov 9 ₹225₹250₹275₹300Jul 3Sep 4Nov 9

₹262.7 month-end · −9.2% over 12 months

₹200₹300Nov '25Jan '26Apr '26Jun '26Sep '26Nov '26 ₹200₹300Nov '25May '26Nov '26

₹262.7 month-end · −42.8% over 3 years

₹200₹400Nov '23Jun '24Jan '25Sep '25Apr '26Nov '26 ₹200₹400Nov '23May '25Nov '26

₹262.7 month-end · −43.2% since Oct '23

₹200₹400Oct '23May '24Jan '25Aug '25Apr '26Nov '26 ₹200₹400Oct '23May '25Nov '26

52-week range ₹165.40 to ₹366.89 · 1-year volatility 45.9%

Was the rally earned?

-9%share price, 1 yearLower P/E held it back

Earnings helped, the multiple did not.

  • Per-share earnings added 56 points, but investors now pay less per rupee of profit (P/E 29.4x to 14.8x), which took 66 points back.
  • The share count barely moved.
Net profit growth: +57 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+57 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: −66 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−66 ptsP/E changeShare count change: −1 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−1 ptsShare count changeShare price: −9%−9%Share priceNet profit growth: +57 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+57ProfitP/E change: −66 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−66P/EShare count change: −1 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−1SharesShare price: −9%−9%Share price
Net profit growth+57 ptsNet profit rose about 82%, which lifts the price.
P/E change-66 ptsThe P/E fell from 29.4x to 14.8x, which lowers the price.
Share count change-1 ptsShare count was little changed. More shares would count against the price.
-43%share price, 3 yearsMultiple-driven

Mostly the multiple.

  • Most of the fall came from investors paying a lower multiple (P/E 22.0x to 14.8x); per-share earnings took off 12 points.
  • The share count rose 36%.
Net profit growth: +11 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+11 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: −31 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−31 ptsP/E changeShare count change: −23 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−23 ptsShare count changeShare price: −43%−43%Share priceNet profit growth: +11 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+11ProfitP/E change: −31 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−31P/EShare count change: −23 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−23SharesShare price: −43%−43%Share price
Net profit growth+11 ptsNet profit rose about 16%, which lifts the price.
P/E change-31 ptsThe P/E fell from 22.0x to 14.8x, which lowers the price.
Share count change-23 ptsShare count rose 36%, which lowers the price.
What do "pts" mean?

"pts" are percentage points of the share price return. The parts add up to the total shown for each period. Because price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count, higher profit pushes the price up, a higher P/E pushes it up, and more shares push it down.

Example: if the price rose 34% and profit growth accounts for +58 pts while a lower P/E accounts for -24 pts, then 58 - 24 = 34. The +58 is not the profit growth rate itself: it is the part of the price move that profit growth explains.

Not shown for 5 years: earnings were negative at one end, or there is not enough history.

Net profit is trailing twelve months as reported with a 60-day lag.

Compare this with INDIAN OIL CORPORATION

How rough has the ride been?

Maximum drawdown-70.9%not yet recovered
1-year volatility45.9%annualised
Beta vs sector index0.643-year daily, correlation 0.27
Volume spikes3last 90 sessions, 5x the 50-day median

Drawdown from peak

0%−20%−40%−60%202420252026−70.9% 0%−20%−40%−60%202420252026−70.9%
Largest drawdowns

-70.9% (2024-04 peak to 2026-03 low, not yet recovered)

-25.8% (2024-02 peak to 2024-03 low, recovered 2024-04)

Most recent volume spikes

2026-11-09: 132.5x the 50-day median, price +8.5% that day

2026-08-07: 11.9x the 50-day median, price +0.4% that day

2026-08-06: 5.8x the 50-day median, price +5.8% that day

Beta is the slope of daily returns against a market-cap-weighted index of the sector's other listed companies, built from today's constituents (so it excludes companies no longer listed).

Is it expensive against its own past and its peers?

14.8xP/E todayNear its historic low
Against its own history5th percentile
CheapestMedian 22.6xDearest

Usual range 16.8x to 28.8x since 2023-10.

Against Energy Minerals14.8x vs 12.7x
This company
14.8x
Sector median
12.7x

16% above the Energy Minerals median.

11.2x19.9x28.7x37.4xOct '23Jun '24Feb '25Oct '25Jun '26Nov '2611.2x19.9x28.7x37.4xOct '23Nov '24Dec '25Nov '26
P/E (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianEnergy Minerals median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/B (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianEnergy Minerals median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/S (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianEnergy Minerals median
How to read this

Shaded band: 10th to 90th percentile of the company's own P/E history; dotted line: its median; orange line: sector median (companies with a positive multiple, at least 5 in the sector).

Sector figures are built from today's listed companies, so they exclude companies that are no longer listed.

All terms explained in the glossary →

How Energy Minerals is valued

Where does it rank among Energy Minerals peers?

Each cell is the company's percentile rank among its Energy Minerals peers (non-financial companies) that month.
Darker is better-ranked.
Rows marked ↓ are inverted (lower debt, shorter cash cycle and a lower P/E rank higher).

Where it ranks today

  • ROCE20th▼ 3 pts vs a year ago
  • Op. margin64th▲ 21 pts vs a year ago
  • Revenue growth38th▼ 42 pts vs a year ago
  • EPS growth90th▲ 70 pts vs a year ago
  • Debt/equity ↓75th▲ 8 pts vs a year ago
  • Cash cycle ↓96th▲ 11 pts vs a year ago
  • P/E ↓44th▲ 30 pts vs a year ago
  • 12M momentum50th▲ 21 pts vs a year ago

Rank history

ROCE
Op. margin
Revenue growth
EPS growth
Debt/equity ↓
Cash cycle ↓
P/E ↓
12M momentum
Dec '21Jul '22Jan '23Jul '23Jan '24Jul '24Jan '25Jul '25Jan '26Jul '26Nov '26
Lower rank Higher rank Not enough data

Percentiles use today's listed companies in the sector and need at least 5 peers with a value; grey cells have too few.
ROE is computed from net profit and book value where the source does not report it.

The Energy Minerals sector page Watch it move against Energy Minerals in the Observatory

What is the price implying?

~11%annual earnings growth implied by the priceIn line with delivered growth

At normalised P/E (five-year average earnings) of 14.6x, a holder earning 12%/yr needs earnings to grow about 11.1%/yr for 10 years, then trade at 15x.

Delivered12.6%/yrEPS, last 8 fiscal years · 3-yr avg to 3-yr avg
Gap−1.4 ptsimplied minus delivered
Rank562ndmost demanding of 856

Over time

Implied growth by month (solid) and delivered growth (dashed).

0%26%51% Oct 2023Nov 2026 0%26%51% Oct 2023Nov 2026

Change the assumptions

Exit P/E / return11%12%13%
12x12.6%13.6%14.6%
15x10.2%11.1%12.1%
20x7.1%8.1%9.0%

Drag a slider to test other assumptions

Implied: 11.1%/yr

“Implied growth” is what the current price would require under our stated assumptions, not what we expect. How this is calculated and the market-wide lists.

What prices imply across Energy Minerals The market-wide Expectations lists

Key figures

Share Priceclose 9 Nov
₹262.70
P/E
14.8x
ROCE
9.0%
Market Cap
₹1077 cr
Revenue (TTM)
₹1130 cr
P/S
1.0x
P/B
1.1x
ROE
7.3%
Operating Margin
19.0%
Debt / Equity
0.1x
Promoter Holding
50.7%
12M Momentum
-9.2%

52-week range

₹165.40₹366.89
48% of the way from its 52-week low to its high

Price risk

1Y volatility
45.9%
Beta vs sector
1-year daily
0.51

Balance sheet & cash

Interest cover
operating profit ÷ interest
8.1x
Cash from profit, 3Y
operating cash flow ÷ net profit
1.94x
Share count, 1Y
unchanged

Are profits backed by cash?

5 of 7checks within range1 beyond a threshold
Other income reliance21%Near threshold

Other income as a share of pre-tax profit (trailing twelve months): 20.8%. Bands: below 15%, 15% to 35%, above 35%.

Tax rate29%Within range

Median quarterly effective tax rate over about 2.5 years: 29.0%. Bands: 15% to 35%, 5% to 15% or 35% to 50%, outside 5% to 50%.

Cash conversion1.94xWithin range

Operating cash flow divided by net profit over the last three fiscal years: 1.94x (cash from operations ₹357 cr, net profit ₹184 cr). Bands: 0.8x and above, 0.5x to 0.8x, below 0.5x.

Free cash flow1 of 5 yrsBeyond threshold

Fiscal years with positive free cash flow in the last 5: 1. Bands: at least 80% of years, 40% to 80%, below 40%.

Receivable days vs history-4 daysWithin range

Debtor days are below the median of the previous three fiscal years by 4 days (11 vs 15). Bands: under 15 days, 15 to 45, over 45.

Capital work in progress13% of fixed assetsWithin range

Capital work-in-progress is 13% of fixed assets. Bands: not rising or up to 30%; rising for three years and above 30%; rising and above 60%.

Payable days-1 days / 2 yrsWithin range

Days payable changed by -1 over two years. Bands: rise of up to 30 days; more than 30 days.

Tap a check to see how it is measured

How to read this

Each check is a named rule with fixed thresholds, not a score. Annual statements are the latest restated figures, so a past year may differ from what was originally reported.

All terms explained in the glossary →

Who has been buying and selling?

  • Over 2 years, DIIs trimmed 10.9 pts; FIIs added 1.1 pts; promoters added 0.7 pts.

Holdings, Jun '26

How each group changed

GroupDec '23Jun '26Change
Promoters50.1%50.7%+0.7 pts
FIIs0.5%1.6%+1.1 pts
DIIs12.6%1.7%-10.9 pts
Public and others36.8%46.0%+9.1 pts

Number of shareholders

76,224shareholders-1% since Dec '23
60k66k72k77k Dec '23Jun '24Dec '24Jun '25Dec '25Jun '26
Dec '23: 77,357
Mar '24: 60,026
Jun '24: 60,410
Sep '24: 63,722
Dec '24: 64,351
Mar '25: 63,983
Jun '25: 63,785
Sep '25: 67,674
Dec '25: 65,772
Mar '26: 64,935
Jun '26: 76,224
60k66k72k77k Dec '23Dec '24Dec '25Jun '26
Dec '23: 77,357
Mar '24: 60,026
Jun '24: 60,410
Sep '24: 63,722
Dec '24: 64,351
Mar '25: 63,983
Jun '25: 63,785
Sep '25: 67,674
Dec '25: 65,772
Mar '26: 64,935
Jun '26: 76,224

Quarterly shareholding as reported, labelled by the quarter it covers (it becomes visible about two months later).
Shareholder counts are only available for recent quarters.

This quarter's smart-money board

What happened next to similar setups

−2.7%typical 12-month return vs the marketNot meaningfully different from the base rate
  • We found 50 past situations where a non-financial company looked like IRM ENERGY LIMITED today on valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, price momentum, size and volatility.
  • Over the following 12 months the middle half of them returned −27% to +28% vs the market, against −3% for all non-financial companies in the same months.
  • The gap against the base rate (+0.6%, 80% range −9.2% to +4.9%) is within what chance and overlapping periods produce.

Where the 50 outcomes landed

−100%−50%0%+50%+100%
CHEMBOND · May 2024: −54.1% vs market
ORIENTBELL · Mar 2023: −53.7% vs market
GTPL · Jan 2024: −45.7% vs market
KOPRAN · Oct 2024: −43.9% vs market
HERANBA · Dec 2024: −42.8% vs market
IOLCP · Nov 2023: −36.9% vs market
BALMLAWRIE · Feb 2024: −36.3% vs market
SCHAND · Nov 2023: −35.4% vs market
JAGRAN · Mar 2024: −35.2% vs market
EKC · Jan 2025: −34.4% vs market
PLASTIBLEN · Apr 2024: −33.5% vs market
JKIL · Feb 2021: −29.1% vs market
PPAP · Feb 2021: −27.9% vs market
DALMIASUG · Jun 2023: −24.7% vs market
ORIENTCEM · Aug 2024: −22.8% vs market
ADSL · Jul 2024: −22.7% vs market
AEROENTER · Feb 2025: −21.0% vs market
SHRIPISTON · Sep 2021: −19.5% vs market
NAHARPOLY · Jul 2025: −17.4% vs market
INSECTICID · Jan 2025: −13.4% vs market
CLEDUCATE · Mar 2024: −11.3% vs market
NIITLTD · Oct 2021: −9.8% vs market
SPAL · Aug 2024: −9.7% vs market
BODALCHEM · Mar 2021: −9.3% vs market
IFBAGRO · Mar 2020: −5.8% vs market
VSSL · Jul 2024: +0.4% vs market
LUMAXTECH · Apr 2021: +1.3% vs market
IZMO · May 2024: +1.3% vs market
BLISSGVS · Feb 2024: +2.6% vs market
MODISONLTD · Oct 2022: +3.3% vs market
ORIENTCER · Jul 2023: +3.6% vs market
BBL · May 2021: +9.2% vs market
INDNIPPON · Dec 2023: +12.0% vs market
PDMJEPAPER · Mar 2023: +14.5% vs market
MMP · Oct 2023: +16.3% vs market
ALLCARGO · Mar 2020: +17.5% vs market
BHAGERIA · Aug 2025: +21.0% vs market
ANDHRSUGAR · Aug 2021: +29.8% vs market
IFGLEXPOR · Feb 2020: +32.6% vs market
SUNFLAG · May 2022: +42.2% vs market
LGBBROSLTD · Mar 2021: +42.3% vs market
JINDRILL · Mar 2023: +78.8% vs market
PRECAM · Oct 2020: +85.7% vs market
FIEMIND · Apr 2022: +86.1% vs market
GRWRHITECH · May 2023: +86.4% vs market
INFOBEAN · Apr 2025: +123.6% vs market
ONMOBILE · Jun 2020: +134.4% vs market
DBCORP · Oct 2022: +142.6% vs market
MANALIPETC · Jun 2020: +172.8% vs market
BORORENEW · Jan 2020: +289.7% vs market
Similar setups −2.7%All companies −3.3%← worse than the marketbetter than the market →

Each dot is one past situation (hover or tap for details) · Solid dots are the closest matches, listed below · Shaded is the middle half of all companies in the same months · 5 beyond the range shown, drawn at the edge

Similar setups' median
−2.7%
All companies' median
−3.3%
Beat the market
50% vs 46%

50 past situations · 50 companies · 36 months · 2020–2025

The closest matches

CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
DBCORP
Consumer Services
Oct 2022 14x10% +15%−23% +143%
BALMLAWRIE
Producer Manufacturing
Feb 2024 22x10% +114%−14% −36%
BHAGERIA
Process Industries
Aug 2025 21x8% −19%−29% +21%
BODALCHEM
Process Industries
Mar 2021 13x11% +113%−13% −9%
BLISSGVS
Health Technology
Feb 2024 19x12% +59%−14% +3%
Show the other 3 matches
CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
ADSL
Technology Services
Jul 2024 26x10% +48%−9% −23%
IOLCP
Process Industries
Nov 2023 19x14% +33%−13% −37%
SPAL
Consumer Non-Durables
Aug 2024 24x13% +57%−12% −10%
How reliable is this?

Matched on P/E, P/S, ROCE, operating margin, debt/equity, interest cover, revenue growth, 12-month momentum, drawdown from 12-month high, size and volatility. Closest on: 12-month momentum, P/S and drawdown from 12-month high. One match per company and at most 7 from any one month.

Independent periods: the matches fall in 6 distinct 12-month windows. Matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, so fewer windows means less evidence.

How this is built

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to IRM ENERGY LIMITED. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

Methodology

How historical analogs are built

Data as of 2026-11-09. Outcome pool: Jan 2020 to Oct 2025.

For every company we look at the situation it is in today (valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, 12-month price momentum, drawdown, size and volatility) and find past company-months that looked most like it. We then show what happened to those past situations over the following 12 months, measured against the ApnaFunda All index and against the base rate. It describes history. It does not predict anything.

What is compared

FeatureWeightNon-financialFinancial
P/E1yesyes
P/S1yes—
P/B1—yes
ROCE1yes—
operating margin1yes—
ROE1—yes
debt/equity0.75yes—
interest cover0.5yes—
revenue growth0.75yesyes
12-month momentum1yesyes
drawdown from 12-month high0.75yesyes
size0.75yesyes
volatility0.5yesyes

Weights were set by judgement before any outcome was looked at and are never tuned on results. Loss-making companies (negative P/E or net profit) are only matched with other loss-making companies. Banks, NBFCs and insurers are compared only with each other and use a different feature set. Every feature is converted, month by month, to its rank among companies in the same pool in that month, so a P/E of 30 in a hot market and a P/E of 22 in a cold one can match if both were equally expensive for their time. Only that month's data is used.

How closeness and the sample are defined

Distance is the weighted root-mean-square gap between the standardised features both companies have. A match needs at least 70% of the query's feature weight, a distance of at most 0.9, and 30 matches at minimum to be shown. We keep up to 50 matches with these exclusions: never the company itself, one match per company (its closest month), and at most 7 from any one calendar month so a single market episode cannot dominate.

Base rate

The base rate is the distribution of 12-month returns, relative to the market, of every eligible company-month in the same pool, with each month weighted to match the months the analogs came from. It answers: how did a random company do in these same months? Because matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, we also report the number of distinct 12-month windows behind a result, and a bootstrap that resamples months decides whether the analog median differs from the base rate at all. "Not meaningfully different" is the usual outcome and the page copy is written for it.

Limits you should know

  • One market period. The outcome pool covers 2020–2025 only (70 months), including the 2020 crash and the 2020–21 rally.
  • Survivorship. Only companies listed today are included. Delisted and bankrupt companies are missing, which flatters past outcomes, particularly for distressed-looking setups.
  • Price return only. Dividends are excluded, and the benchmark is an ApnaFunda market-cap-weighted index of the same listed companies, not an official index.
  • Reporting lag. Fundamentals are matched on an assumed 60-day lag after the quarter end, not on real announcement dates.
  • Pools: non-financial: 98,395 company-months from 2019 companies; financial: 5,659 company-months from 108 companies. 2349 companies currently have a result; the rest are suppressed because too few comparable situations exist.

Does it work? A walk-forward check

The walk-forward check has not been run for this build, so skill is shown as not yet measured.

Disclaimer

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to any company shown. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

What else looks like this?

Companies with the most similar financial profile today, regardless of industry.

GHCL TEXTILESGHCLTEXTIL
Process Industries
64%similar
debt/equitymarket cap
Finance
64%similar
P/EROCE
Process Industries
62%similar
promoter holdingmarket cap
Process Industries
61%similar
EPS growthrevenue
Transportation
61%similar
debt/equityoperating margin
Energy Minerals
32%similar
EPS growthvolatility
Energy Minerals
26%similar
P/Edebt/equity
Energy Minerals
12%similar
ROCEoperating margin

Similarity is statistical, based on reported metrics; it does not imply similar business quality or future returns.

What changed?

30 events since Jun '24

  1. NovPriceVolume reached 132.5x its 50-day median on 2026-11-09; price +8.5% that day.
  2. SepInstitutionsFII + DII holding fell 3.2 pts over 2 quarters to 3.3%.
  3. SepValuationP/E fell below the 10th percentile of its own history to date (14.9x).
  4. SepPeer rankMoved into the 2nd quartile of Energy Minerals on operating margin (from the 3rd quartile).
  5. AugPriceVolume reached 11.9x its 50-day median on 2026-08-07; price +0.4% that day.
  6. JunResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned positive.
  7. JunPeer rankMoved into the 2nd quartile of Energy Minerals on EPS growth (from the 3rd quartile).
  8. AprPriceVolume reached 651.5x its 50-day median on 2026-04-23; price +13.4% that day.
Show 22 earlier events
  1. MarPriceFell 71% from the Apr 2024 peak to the Mar 2026 low.
  2. MarValuationP/E fell below the 10th percentile of its own history to date (16.5x).
  3. MarPeer rankSlipped to the 3rd quartile of Energy Minerals on operating margin (from the 2nd quartile).
  4. MarPriceVolume reached 36.6x its 50-day median on 2026-03-25; price -2.6% that day.
  5. DecPeer rankMoved into the 2nd quartile of Energy Minerals on operating margin (from the 3rd quartile).
  6. OctValuationP/E crossed above the 90th percentile of its own history to date (31.7x).
  7. OctPriceVolume reached 14.6x its 50-day median on 2025-10-01; price +0.1% that day.
  8. SepResultsRevenue (TTM) reached a new high of ₹1,013 cr.
  9. SepPeer rankSlipped to the bottom quartile of Energy Minerals on EPS growth (from the 3rd quartile).
  10. SepPriceVolume reached 611.0x its 50-day median on 2025-09-18; price +14.1% that day.
  11. JulPeer rankSlipped to the bottom quartile of Energy Minerals on ROCE (from the 3rd quartile).
  12. JunPeer rankMoved into the 3rd quartile of Energy Minerals on EPS growth (from the bottom quartile).
  13. MayDebtDebt / equity halved over 12 months to 0.28x.
  14. AprPriceVolume reached 12.4x its 50-day median on 2025-04-01; price +6.0% that day.
  15. MarPriceVolume reached 28.5x its 50-day median on 2025-03-27; price +4.0% that day.
  16. DecResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned negative.
  17. DecInstitutionsFII + DII holding fell 5.3 pts over 2 quarters to 8.7%.
  18. DecPeer rankSlipped to the 3rd quartile of Energy Minerals on operating margin (from the 2nd quartile).
  19. OctDebtDebt / equity halved over 12 months to 0.28x.
  20. OctSharesShare count is up 36.7% over 12 months.
  21. SepPriceVolume reached 11.1x its 50-day median on 2024-09-10; price +6.0% that day.
  22. JunPeer rankSlipped to the 3rd quartile of Energy Minerals on ROCE (from the 2nd quartile).

Events are generated from the data by fixed rules.
The month shown is when the change became visible in the reported figures, assuming a 60-day lag after each quarter end; it is not an announcement date.

Where price and fundamentals disagree, market-wide Rewind the whole market to any month

Monthly history38 months · 2023-10 to 2026-11
MonthP/ERevenue (TTM)ROEROCEDebt / Equity
2026-1114.8x₹1130 cr7.3%9.0%0.1x
2026-1013.5x₹1130 cr7.4%9.0%0.1x
2026-0914.9x₹1130 cr7.4%9.0%0.1x
2026-0822.0x₹1066 cr5.4%9.0%0.1x
2026-0719.9x₹1066 cr5.4%9.0%0.1x
2026-0620.2x₹1066 cr5.4%9.0%0.1x
2026-0524.2x₹1054 cr4.8%8.0%0.2x
2026-0432.7x₹1054 cr4.8%8.0%0.2x
2026-0316.5x₹1054 cr4.8%8.0%0.2x
2026-0223.9x₹1040 cr4.4%8.0%0.2x
2026-0124.4x₹1040 cr4.4%8.0%0.2x
2025-1228.6x₹1040 cr4.4%8.0%0.2x
2025-1129.4x₹1013 cr4.3%8.0%0.2x
2025-1031.7x₹1013 cr4.3%8.0%0.2x
2025-0937.4x₹1013 cr4.3%8.0%0.2x
2025-0824.0x₹976 cr4.8%8.0%0.2x
2025-0726.6x₹976 cr4.8%8.0%0.2x
2025-0627.7x₹976 cr4.8%8.0%0.2x
2025-0523.3x₹922 cr5.5%15.0%0.3x
2025-0423.7x₹922 cr5.5%15.0%0.3x
2025-0323.0x₹922 cr5.5%15.0%0.3x
2025-0216.9x₹897 cr7.0%15.0%0.3x
2025-0120.4x₹897 cr7.0%15.0%0.3x
2024-1222.3x₹897 cr7.0%15.0%0.3x
2024-1117.6x₹885 cr8.6%15.0%0.3x
2024-1018.8x₹885 cr8.6%15.0%0.3x
2024-0920.5x₹885 cr8.6%15.0%0.3x
2024-0820.3x₹891 cr9.4%15.0%0.3x
2024-0722.1x₹891 cr9.4%15.0%0.3x
2024-0621.5x₹891 cr9.4%15.0%0.3x
2024-0522.8x₹980 cr19.4%17.0%1.0x
2024-0425.7x₹980 cr19.4%17.0%1.0x
2024-0322.5x₹980 cr19.4%17.0%1.0x
2024-0226.8x₹980 cr19.4%17.0%1.0x
2024-0125.8x₹980 cr19.4%17.0%1.0x
2023-1225.8x₹980 cr19.4%17.0%1.0x
2023-1122.0x₹980 cr19.4%17.0%1.0x
2023-1022.2x₹980 cr19.4%17.0%1.0x

Methodology and data notes

Methodology

Methodology and data notes

All figures come from public exchange prices and screener.in financial statements. Quarterly and annual results are shown from 60 days after the period end, so a month never uses a result before it would plausibly have been published. Statements are the latest versions, which may include later restatements.

Sector medians, percentiles and indices use today's listed companies in the sector (survivorship bias). Prices are adjusted for splits and bonus issues; around a corporate action the fundamentals may lag the price by up to a month, and affected sections are hidden.

The return decomposition uses price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count. The reverse DCF uses a fixed 12% cost of equity, a 10-year horizon and a 15x terminal P/E, and is an illustration only. Events, flags and twins follow fixed rules and thresholds described next to each section.

Feedback