अApnaFunda

GENESYS INTERNATIONAL CORPORAT (GENESYS)

Technology Services · Packaged Software · figures to Nov '26

Quality scoreHow the business itself ranks against its sector peers on profitability, 3-year growth and leverage. 50 is the middle of the sector.61 / 100
Profitability 64Growth 61Balance sheet 57
Momentum scoreHow strong the recent trend is: 3-month price change, 12-month improvement in earnings and the rise in FII + DII holding, among companies above ₹500 cr.14 / 100
Price 26Earnings 9FII/DII 8

Passes these screensPrice ahead of businessPromoters buying

Share price

Closing priceAdjusted for splits and bonus issues.

₹188.11 latest close · −18.3% over the last 90 sessions

₹200₹250₹300Jul 3Jul 29Aug 24Sep 17Oct 14Nov 9 ₹200₹250₹300Jul 3Sep 4Nov 9

₹188.11 month-end · −36.0% over 12 months

₹150₹200₹250₹300Nov '25Jan '26Apr '26Jun '26Sep '26Nov '26 ₹150₹200₹250₹300Nov '25May '26Nov '26

₹188.11 month-end · −33.2% over 3 years

₹200₹400₹600Nov '23Jun '24Jan '25Sep '25Apr '26Nov '26 ₹200₹400₹600Nov '23May '25Nov '26

₹188.11 month-end · +103.4% since Jan '19

₹0₹200₹400₹600Jan '19Aug '20Mar '22Sep '23Apr '25Nov '26 ₹0₹200₹400₹600Jan '19Dec '22Nov '26

52-week range ₹135.10 to ₹351.85 · 1-year volatility 76.1%

Was the rally earned?

-36%share price, 1 yearEarnings-driven

Mostly earnings.

  • Per-share earnings took off 54 points, while the multiple moved less (P/E 32.4x to 40.8x).
  • The share count rose 5%.
Net profit growth: −51 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).−51 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: +19 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+19 ptsP/E changeShare count change: −4 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−4 ptsShare count changeShare price: −36%−36%Share priceNet profit growth: −51 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).−51ProfitP/E change: +19 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+19P/EShare count change: −4 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−4SharesShare price: −36%−36%Share price
Net profit growth-51 ptsNet profit fell about 47%, which lowers the price.
P/E change+19 ptsThe P/E rose from 32.4x to 40.8x, which lifts the price.
Share count change-4 ptsShare count rose 5%, which lowers the price.
-33%share price, 3 yearsLower P/E held it back

Earnings helped, the multiple did not.

  • Per-share earnings added 31 points, but investors now pay less per rupee of profit (P/E 89.1x to 40.8x), which took 64 points back.
  • The share count rose 41%.
Net profit growth: +59 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+59 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: −64 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−64 ptsP/E changeShare count change: −28 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−28 ptsShare count changeShare price: −33%−33%Share priceNet profit growth: +59 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+59ProfitP/E change: −64 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−64P/EShare count change: −28 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−28SharesShare price: −33%−33%Share price
Net profit growth+59 ptsNet profit rose about 106%, which lifts the price.
P/E change-64 ptsThe P/E fell from 89.1x to 40.8x, which lowers the price.
Share count change-28 ptsShare count rose 41%, which lowers the price.
What do "pts" mean?

"pts" are percentage points of the share price return. The parts add up to the total shown for each period. Because price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count, higher profit pushes the price up, a higher P/E pushes it up, and more shares push it down.

Example: if the price rose 34% and profit growth accounts for +58 pts while a lower P/E accounts for -24 pts, then 58 - 24 = 34. The +58 is not the profit growth rate itself: it is the part of the price move that profit growth explains.

Not shown for 5 years: earnings were negative at one end, or there is not enough history.

Net profit is trailing twelve months as reported with a 60-day lag.

Compare this with ONE 97 COMMUNICATIONS PAYTM

How rough has the ride been?

Maximum drawdown-84.3%recovered 2021-07
1-year volatility76.1%annualised
Beta vs sector index0.803-year daily, correlation 0.24
Volume spikes7last 90 sessions, 5x the 50-day median

Drawdown from peak

0%−25%−50%−75%2020202120222023202420252026−83.7% 0%−25%−50%−75%2020202220242026−83.7%
Largest drawdowns

-84.3% (2019-01 peak to 2020-03 low, recovered 2021-07)

-80.4% (2025-01 peak to 2026-05 low, not yet recovered)

-59.4% (2022-07 peak to 2023-08 low, recovered 2024-04)

Most recent volume spikes

2026-09-11: 6.1x the 50-day median, price +2.7% that day

2026-09-10: 20x the 50-day median, price +9.2% that day

2026-09-09: 8.6x the 50-day median, price -4.8% that day

Beta is the slope of daily returns against a market-cap-weighted index of the sector's other listed companies, built from today's constituents (so it excludes companies no longer listed).

Is it expensive against its own past and its peers?

40.8xP/E todayWithin its usual range
Against its own history28th percentile
CheapestMedian 67.6xDearest

Usual range 23.4x to 135.7x since 2019-01.

Against Technology Services40.8x vs 21.1x
This company
40.8x
Sector median
21.1x

94% above the Technology Services median.

7.4x69.9x132.4x194.9xJan '19Aug '20Mar '22Oct '23May '25Nov '267.4x69.9x132.4x194.9xJan '19Sep '21May '24Nov '26
P/E (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianTechnology Services median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/B (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianTechnology Services median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/S (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianTechnology Services median
How to read this

Shaded band: 10th to 90th percentile of the company's own P/E history; dotted line: its median; orange line: sector median (companies with a positive multiple, at least 5 in the sector).

Sector figures are built from today's listed companies, so they exclude companies that are no longer listed.

All terms explained in the glossary →

How Technology Services is valued

Where does it rank among Technology Services peers?

Each cell is the company's percentile rank among its Technology Services peers (non-financial companies) that month.
Darker is better-ranked.
Rows marked ↓ are inverted (lower debt, shorter cash cycle and a lower P/E rank higher).

Where it ranks today

  • ROCE32nd▼ 14 pts vs a year ago
  • Op. margin96thflat vs a year ago
  • Revenue growth29th▼ 59 pts vs a year ago
  • EPS growth11th▼ 77 pts vs a year ago
  • Debt/equity ↓30th▲ 3 pts vs a year ago
  • Cash cycle ↓7thflat vs a year ago
  • P/E ↓24th▼ 21 pts vs a year ago
  • 12M momentum28th▲ 16 pts vs a year ago

Rank history

ROCE
Op. margin
Revenue growth
EPS growth
Debt/equity ↓
Cash cycle ↓
P/E ↓
12M momentum
Dec '21Jul '22Jan '23Jul '23Jan '24Jul '24Jan '25Jul '25Jan '26Jul '26Nov '26
Lower rank Higher rank Not enough data

Percentiles use today's listed companies in the sector and need at least 5 peers with a value; grey cells have too few.
ROE is computed from net profit and book value where the source does not report it.

The Technology Services sector page Watch it move against Technology Services in the Observatory

What is the price implying?

~31%annual earnings growth implied by the priceAbove delivered growth

At normalised P/E (five-year average earnings) of 73.8x, a holder earning 12%/yr needs earnings to grow about 31.3%/yr for 10 years, then trade at 15x.

Delivered23.0%/yrEPS, last 10 fiscal years · 3-yr avg to 3-yr avg
Gap+8.3 ptsimplied minus delivered
Rank360thmost demanding of 856

Over time

Implied growth by month (solid) and delivered growth (dashed).

-11%56%122% Jan 2019Nov 2026 -11%56%122% Jan 2019Nov 2026

Change the assumptions

Exit P/E / return11%12%13%
12x33.1%34.3%35.5%
15x30.2%31.3%32.5%
20x26.5%27.6%28.8%

Drag a slider to test other assumptions

Implied: 31.3%/yr

“Implied growth” is what the current price would require under our stated assumptions, not what we expect. How this is calculated and the market-wide lists.

What prices imply across Technology Services The market-wide Expectations lists

Key figures

Share Priceclose 9 Nov
₹188.11
P/E
40.8x
ROCE
8.0%
Market Cap
₹1258 cr
Revenue (TTM)
₹338 cr
P/S
3.7x
P/B
1.8x
ROE
4.4%
Operating Margin
34.6%
Debt / Equity
0.2x
Promoter Holding
31.5%
12M Momentum
-35.9%

52-week range

₹135.10₹351.85
24% of the way from its 52-week low to its high

Price risk

1Y volatility
76.1%
Beta vs sector
1-year daily
0.61

Balance sheet & cash

Interest cover
operating profit ÷ interest
4.4x
Cash from profit, 3Y
operating cash flow ÷ net profit
-0.16x
low
Share count, 1Y
+5.0%

Are profits backed by cash?

2 of 6checks within range3 beyond a threshold
Other income reliance35%Beyond threshold

Other income as a share of pre-tax profit (trailing twelve months): 35.4%. Bands: below 15%, 15% to 35%, above 35%.

Tax rate38%Near threshold

Median quarterly effective tax rate over about 2.5 years: 37.6%. Bands: 15% to 35%, 5% to 15% or 35% to 50%, outside 5% to 50%.

Cash conversion-0.16xBeyond threshold

Operating cash flow divided by net profit over the last three fiscal years: -0.16x (cash from operations ₹-18 cr, net profit ₹111 cr). Bands: 0.8x and above, 0.5x to 0.8x, below 0.5x.

Free cash flow1 of 5 yrsBeyond threshold

Fiscal years with positive free cash flow in the last 5: 1. Bands: at least 80% of years, 40% to 80%, below 40%.

Receivable days vs history-35 daysWithin range

Debtor days are below the median of the previous three fiscal years by 35 days (226 vs 261). Bands: under 15 days, 15 to 45, over 45.

Capital work in progress63% of fixed assetsWithin range

Capital work-in-progress is 63% of fixed assets. Bands: not rising or up to 30%; rising for three years and above 30%; rising and above 60%.

Payable days—Not enough data

Not enough reported data to compute this.

Tap a check to see how it is measured

How to read this

Each check is a named rule with fixed thresholds, not a score. Annual statements are the latest restated figures, so a past year may differ from what was originally reported.

All terms explained in the glossary →

Who has been buying and selling?

  • Over 2 years, promoters trimmed 8.1 pts; FIIs trimmed 3.1 pts; DIIs added 1.1 pts.
  • The number of shareholders rose from 12,902 to 39,922 (+209%) between Dec 2023 and Jun 2026.

Holdings, Jun '26

How each group changed

GroupDec '23Jun '26Change
Promoters39.6%31.5%-8.1 pts
FIIs4.7%1.5%-3.1 pts
DIIs0.1%1.1%+1.1 pts
Public and others55.7%65.9%+10.2 pts

Number of shareholders

39,922shareholders+209% since Dec '23
13k24k34k45k Dec '23Jun '24Dec '24Jun '25Dec '25Jun '26
Dec '23: 12,902
Mar '24: 15,168
Jun '24: 18,897
Sep '24: 22,905
Dec '24: 36,536
Mar '25: 38,243
Jun '25: 44,247
Sep '25: 45,192
Dec '25: 45,140
Mar '26: 43,377
Jun '26: 39,922
13k24k34k45k Dec '23Dec '24Dec '25Jun '26
Dec '23: 12,902
Mar '24: 15,168
Jun '24: 18,897
Sep '24: 22,905
Dec '24: 36,536
Mar '25: 38,243
Jun '25: 44,247
Sep '25: 45,192
Dec '25: 45,140
Mar '26: 43,377
Jun '26: 39,922

Quarterly shareholding as reported, labelled by the quarter it covers (it becomes visible about two months later).
Shareholder counts are only available for recent quarters.

This quarter's smart-money board

What happened next to similar setups

−16.1%typical 12-month return vs the marketBelow the base rate
  • We found 50 past situations where a non-financial company looked like GENESYS INTERNATIONAL CORPORAT today on valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, price momentum, size and volatility.
  • Over the following 12 months the middle half of them returned −35% to +10% vs the market, against 0% for all non-financial companies in the same months.
  • The analogs' median sat below that base rate (gap −16.5%, 80% range −26.0% to −9.5%), but the matches cluster in only 6 distinct 12-month windows.

Where the 50 outcomes landed

−100%−50%0%+50%+100%
AKASH · Feb 2022: −82.0% vs market
KAMOPAINTS · Jul 2024: −75.3% vs market
GSTL · Jul 2023: −66.0% vs market
RILINFRA · Jun 2023: −64.1% vs market
GSLSU · Apr 2024: −54.4% vs market
SEPC · Jun 2025: −51.3% vs market
INDOWIND · Feb 2025: −51.2% vs market
SOUTHWEST · Jun 2023: −46.2% vs market
DYNPRO · May 2023: −43.7% vs market
INDOUS · Oct 2025: −42.1% vs market
INVENTURE · Jun 2022: −38.5% vs market
ONMOBILE · Jul 2024: −35.5% vs market
TAJGVK · Nov 2020: −35.0% vs market
PILITA · Jan 2022: −33.5% vs market
COMPUSOFT · Feb 2025: −31.9% vs market
DAVANGERE · Jan 2025: −31.6% vs market
THEINVEST · Jul 2021: −29.7% vs market
KOKUYOCMLN · Sep 2020: −28.2% vs market
WIPL · Apr 2020: −25.7% vs market
MCL · Jun 2020: −25.0% vs market
PRIVISCL · Jul 2022: −23.2% vs market
NGLFINE · Oct 2023: −21.3% vs market
XCHANGING · Jun 2024: −19.6% vs market
HGM · Apr 2023: −17.8% vs market
MARATHON · Mar 2020: −16.2% vs market
SAMBHAAV · Jan 2020: −16.0% vs market
SUBEXLTD · Oct 2022: −10.0% vs market
FELIX · Jul 2025: −7.5% vs market
ROHLTD · Jun 2020: −7.4% vs market
DPSCLTD · Mar 2021: −6.6% vs market
EMBDL · Apr 2021: −6.6% vs market
SONAMLTD · Mar 2021: −4.5% vs market
SHALBY · Jan 2021: −3.9% vs market
SEMAC · Jun 2021: −2.1% vs market
ZEEL · Oct 2020: +0.3% vs market
DCAL · Jun 2020: +7.8% vs market
OMINFRAL · Jun 2020: +10.0% vs market
NRBBEARING · Jun 2020: +10.6% vs market
MMP · Aug 2020: +10.8% vs market
JAICORPLTD · Feb 2022: +11.2% vs market
IRIS · Jan 2023: +14.1% vs market
HESTERBIO · Jun 2025: +16.5% vs market
SANGHIIND · Oct 2020: +31.1% vs market
V2RETAIL · Mar 2020: +34.8% vs market
SYNCOMF · Mar 2024: +42.5% vs market
SEAMECLTD · Jul 2023: +46.8% vs market
SURANAT&P · Jun 2021: +47.7% vs market
BHANDARI · Apr 2020: +59.1% vs market
TIRUMALCHM · Jun 2020: +77.4% vs market
BORORENEW · Jun 2021: +124.8% vs market
Similar setups −16.1%All companies +0.4%← worse than the marketbetter than the market →

Each dot is one past situation (hover or tap for details) · Solid dots are the closest matches, listed below · Shaded is the middle half of all companies in the same months · 1 beyond the range shown, drawn at the edge

Similar setups' median
−16.1%
All companies' median
+0.4%
Beat the market
32% vs 50%

50 past situations · 50 companies · 33 months · 2020–2025

The closest matches

CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
DPSCLTD
Utilities
Mar 2021 83x4% +89%−29% −7%
SAMBHAAV
Consumer Services
Jan 2020 21x6% −32%−46% −16%
INVENTURE
Finance
Jun 2022 20x9% −35%−58% −39%
SEAMECLTD
Industrial Services
Jul 2023 57x3% −14%−40% +47%
DCAL
Health Technology
Jun 2020 12x4% −46%−46% +8%
Show the other 3 matches
CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
BHANDARI
Consumer Non-Durables
Apr 2020 —9% −50%−57% +59%
V2RETAIL
Retail Trade
Mar 2020 13x8% −82%−82% +35%
ROHLTD
Consumer Services
Jun 2020 30x8% −50%−51% −7%
How reliable is this?

Matched on P/E, P/S, ROCE, operating margin, debt/equity, interest cover, revenue growth, 12-month momentum, drawdown from 12-month high, size and volatility. Closest on: ROCE, drawdown from 12-month high and P/S. One match per company and at most 7 from any one month.

Independent periods: the matches fall in 6 distinct 12-month windows. Matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, so fewer windows means less evidence.

How this is built

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to GENESYS INTERNATIONAL CORPORAT. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

Methodology

How historical analogs are built

Data as of 2026-11-09. Outcome pool: Jan 2020 to Oct 2025.

For every company we look at the situation it is in today (valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, 12-month price momentum, drawdown, size and volatility) and find past company-months that looked most like it. We then show what happened to those past situations over the following 12 months, measured against the ApnaFunda All index and against the base rate. It describes history. It does not predict anything.

What is compared

FeatureWeightNon-financialFinancial
P/E1yesyes
P/S1yes—
P/B1—yes
ROCE1yes—
operating margin1yes—
ROE1—yes
debt/equity0.75yes—
interest cover0.5yes—
revenue growth0.75yesyes
12-month momentum1yesyes
drawdown from 12-month high0.75yesyes
size0.75yesyes
volatility0.5yesyes

Weights were set by judgement before any outcome was looked at and are never tuned on results. Loss-making companies (negative P/E or net profit) are only matched with other loss-making companies. Banks, NBFCs and insurers are compared only with each other and use a different feature set. Every feature is converted, month by month, to its rank among companies in the same pool in that month, so a P/E of 30 in a hot market and a P/E of 22 in a cold one can match if both were equally expensive for their time. Only that month's data is used.

How closeness and the sample are defined

Distance is the weighted root-mean-square gap between the standardised features both companies have. A match needs at least 70% of the query's feature weight, a distance of at most 0.9, and 30 matches at minimum to be shown. We keep up to 50 matches with these exclusions: never the company itself, one match per company (its closest month), and at most 7 from any one calendar month so a single market episode cannot dominate.

Base rate

The base rate is the distribution of 12-month returns, relative to the market, of every eligible company-month in the same pool, with each month weighted to match the months the analogs came from. It answers: how did a random company do in these same months? Because matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, we also report the number of distinct 12-month windows behind a result, and a bootstrap that resamples months decides whether the analog median differs from the base rate at all. "Not meaningfully different" is the usual outcome and the page copy is written for it.

Limits you should know

  • One market period. The outcome pool covers 2020–2025 only (70 months), including the 2020 crash and the 2020–21 rally.
  • Survivorship. Only companies listed today are included. Delisted and bankrupt companies are missing, which flatters past outcomes, particularly for distressed-looking setups.
  • Price return only. Dividends are excluded, and the benchmark is an ApnaFunda market-cap-weighted index of the same listed companies, not an official index.
  • Reporting lag. Fundamentals are matched on an assumed 60-day lag after the quarter end, not on real announcement dates.
  • Pools: non-financial: 98,395 company-months from 2019 companies; financial: 5,659 company-months from 108 companies. 2349 companies currently have a result; the rest are suppressed because too few comparable situations exist.

Does it work? A walk-forward check

The walk-forward check has not been run for this build, so skill is shown as not yet measured.

Disclaimer

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to any company shown. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

What else looks like this?

Companies with the most similar financial profile today, regardless of industry.

HUBTOWNHUBTOWN
Finance
64%similar
promoter holdingrevenue growth
Health Technology
63%similar
debt/equityrevenue
Health Technology
54%similar
P/Epromoter holding
Consumer Services
51%similar
revenuemarket cap
Process Industries
50%similar
volatilityrevenue
IZMOIZMO
Technology Services
58%similar
revenue growthmarket cap
Technology Services
53%similar
debt/equitypromoter holding
EMUDHRAEMUDHRA
Technology Services
47%similar
operating marginvolatility

Similarity is statistical, based on reported metrics; it does not imply similar business quality or future returns.

What changed?

30 events since Nov '23

  1. SepResultsRevenue (TTM) reached a new high of ₹338 cr.
  2. SepInstitutionsFII + DII holding fell 4.6 pts over 2 quarters to 2.7%.
  3. AugPriceVolume reached 41.4x its 50-day median on 2026-08-26; price +15.0% that day.
  4. JunPeer rankMoved into the top quartile of Technology Services on operating margin (from the 2nd quartile).
  5. JunSharesShare count is up 5.0% over 12 months.
  6. JunPriceVolume reached 43.3x its 50-day median on 2026-06-10; price +16.4% that day.
  7. MayPriceFell 80% from the Jan 2025 peak to the May 2026 low.
  8. MarResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned negative.
Show 22 earlier events
  1. MarPeer rankSlipped to the 2nd quartile of Technology Services on operating margin (from the top quartile).
  2. JanValuationP/E fell below the 10th percentile of its own history to date (23.4x).
  3. JanPriceVolume reached 15.6x its 50-day median on 2026-01-22; price +9.7% that day.
  4. DecPeer rankSlipped to the 2nd quartile of Technology Services on EPS growth (from the top quartile).
  5. DecPriceVolume reached 65.7x its 50-day median on 2025-12-05; price +10.1% that day.
  6. MarPromoterPromoter holding fell 4.2 pts to 33.1%.
  7. FebPriceVolume reached 5.5x its 50-day median on 2025-02-17; price -6.0% that day.
  8. OctPriceVolume reached 13.2x its 50-day median on 2024-10-31; price -5.4% that day.
  9. SepPeer rankMoved into the top quartile of Technology Services on EPS growth (from the 3rd quartile).
  10. AugValuationP/E crossed above the 90th percentile of its own history to date (156.0x).
  11. AugPriceVolume reached 12.8x its 50-day median on 2024-08-29; price +9.0% that day.
  12. JulPriceRegained the 2024-04 peak, 1 month after the low.
  13. JulSharesShare count is up 5.3% over 12 months.
  14. JunResultsRevenue (TTM) reached a new high of ₹198 cr.
  15. JunInstitutionsFII + DII holding rose 3.9 pts over 1 quarter to 8.7%.
  16. JunPriceFell 38% from the Apr 2024 peak to the Jun 2024 low.
  17. JunPeer rankMoved into the 3rd quartile of Technology Services on ROCE (from the bottom quartile).
  18. AprPriceRegained the 2022-07 peak, 8 months after the low.
  19. AprPriceVolume reached 7.0x its 50-day median on 2024-04-04; price +10.8% that day.
  20. MarPeer rankSlipped to the bottom quartile of Technology Services on ROCE (from the 3rd quartile).
  21. MarPriceVolume reached 11.1x its 50-day median on 2024-03-01; price +11.0% that day.
  22. NovPriceVolume reached 60.8x its 50-day median on 2023-11-22; price +16.9% that day.

Events are generated from the data by fixed rules.
The month shown is when the change became visible in the reported figures, assuming a 60-day lag after each quarter end; it is not an announcement date.

Where price and fundamentals disagree, market-wide Rewind the whole market to any month

Monthly history60 months · 2021-12 to 2026-11
MonthP/ERevenue (TTM)ROEROCEDebt / Equity
2026-1140.8x₹338 cr4.4%8.0%0.2x
2026-1037.1x₹338 cr4.4%8.0%0.2x
2026-0959.3x₹338 cr4.4%8.0%0.2x
2026-0846.6x₹328 cr4.7%8.0%0.2x
2026-0738.0x₹328 cr4.7%8.0%0.2x
2026-0644.6x₹328 cr4.7%8.0%0.2x
2026-0529.9x₹318 cr7.0%15.0%0.2x
2026-0430.5x₹318 cr7.0%15.0%0.2x
2026-0323.6x₹318 cr7.0%15.0%0.2x
2026-0222.6x₹331 cr10.6%15.0%0.2x
2026-0123.4x₹331 cr10.6%15.0%0.2x
2025-1232.8x₹331 cr10.6%15.0%0.2x
2025-1132.4x₹326 cr10.4%15.0%0.2x
2025-1038.3x₹326 cr10.4%15.0%0.2x
2025-0937.7x₹326 cr10.4%15.0%0.2x
2025-0843.4x₹311 cr10.1%15.0%0.2x
2025-0746.3x₹311 cr10.1%15.0%0.2x
2025-0649.6x₹311 cr10.1%15.0%0.2x
2025-0561.6x₹288 cr10.6%8.0%0.1x
2025-0454.4x₹288 cr10.6%8.0%0.1x
2025-0359.8x₹288 cr10.6%8.0%0.1x
2025-0259.6x₹258 cr9.6%8.0%0.1x
2025-0173.7x₹258 cr9.6%8.0%0.1x
2024-1282.5x₹258 cr9.6%8.0%0.1x
2024-11117.4x₹219 cr6.6%8.0%0.1x
2024-10100.2x₹219 cr6.6%8.0%0.1x
2024-0999.8x₹219 cr6.6%8.0%0.1x
2024-08156.0x₹198 cr4.4%8.0%0.1x
2024-07137.7x₹198 cr4.4%8.0%0.1x
2024-06114.2x₹198 cr4.4%8.0%0.1x
2024-05111.6x₹181 cr3.7%7.0%0.1x
2024-04129.0x₹181 cr3.7%7.0%0.1x
2024-03127.7x₹181 cr3.7%7.0%0.1x
2024-02115.6x₹181 cr3.7%7.0%0.1x
2024-01111.3x₹181 cr3.7%7.0%0.1x
2023-1288.5x₹181 cr3.7%7.0%0.1x
2023-1189.1x₹181 cr3.7%7.0%0.1x
2023-1067.9x₹181 cr3.7%7.0%0.1x
2023-0976.1x₹181 cr3.7%7.0%0.1x
2023-0875.1x₹181 cr3.7%7.0%0.1x
2023-0764.7x₹181 cr3.7%7.0%0.1x
2023-0667.6x₹181 cr3.7%7.0%0.1x
2023-0584.7x₹120 cr6.6%4.0%0.1x
2023-0475.0x₹120 cr6.6%4.0%0.1x
2023-0384.0x₹120 cr6.6%4.0%0.1x
2023-02100.2x₹120 cr6.6%4.0%0.1x
2023-01110.4x₹120 cr6.6%4.0%0.1x
2022-12116.1x₹120 cr6.6%4.0%0.1x
2022-11119.3x₹120 cr6.6%4.0%0.1x
2022-10134.1x₹120 cr6.6%4.0%0.1x
2022-09134.1x₹120 cr6.6%4.0%0.1x
2022-08155.7x₹120 cr6.6%4.0%0.1x
2022-07163.9x₹120 cr6.6%4.0%0.1x
2022-06136.0x₹120 cr6.6%4.0%0.1x
2022-05—₹80 cr-29.9%-7.0%0.1x
2022-04—₹80 cr-29.9%-7.0%0.1x
2022-03—₹80 cr-29.9%-7.0%0.1x
2022-02—₹80 cr-29.9%-7.0%0.1x
2022-01—₹80 cr-29.9%-7.0%0.1x
2021-12—₹80 cr-29.9%-7.0%0.1x

Older months are in the live observatory.

Methodology and data notes

Methodology

Methodology and data notes

All figures come from public exchange prices and screener.in financial statements. Quarterly and annual results are shown from 60 days after the period end, so a month never uses a result before it would plausibly have been published. Statements are the latest versions, which may include later restatements.

Sector medians, percentiles and indices use today's listed companies in the sector (survivorship bias). Prices are adjusted for splits and bonus issues; around a corporate action the fundamentals may lag the price by up to a month, and affected sections are hidden.

The return decomposition uses price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count. The reverse DCF uses a fixed 12% cost of equity, a 10-year horizon and a 15x terminal P/E, and is an illustration only. Events, flags and twins follow fixed rules and thresholds described next to each section.

Feedback