अApnaFunda

SIGACHI INDUSTRIES LIMITED (SIGACHI)

Health Technology · Pharmaceuticals: Major · figures to Nov '26

Quality scoreHow the business itself ranks against its sector peers on profitability, 3-year growth and leverage. 50 is the middle of the sector.51 / 100
Profitability 31Growth 66Balance sheet 54
Momentum scoreHow strong the recent trend is: 3-month price change, 12-month improvement in earnings and the rise in FII + DII holding, among companies above ₹500 cr.44 / 100
Price 79Earnings 9

Passes these screensPrice ahead of business

Share price

Closing priceAdjusted for splits and bonus issues.

₹27.14 latest close · +19.6% over the last 90 sessions

₹25₹30₹35Jul 3Jul 29Aug 24Sep 17Oct 14Nov 9 ₹25₹30₹35Jul 3Sep 4Nov 9

₹27.14 month-end · −28.9% over 12 months

₹20₹30₹40Nov '25Jan '26Apr '26Jun '26Sep '26Nov '26 ₹20₹30₹40Nov '25May '26Nov '26

₹27.14 month-end · −48.3% over 3 years

₹20₹40₹60₹80Nov '23Jun '24Jan '25Sep '25Apr '26Nov '26 ₹20₹40₹60₹80Nov '23May '25Nov '26

₹27.14 month-end · −34.1% since Nov '21

₹20₹40₹60₹80Nov '21Nov '22Nov '23Nov '24Nov '25Nov '26 ₹20₹40₹60₹80Nov '21May '24Nov '26

52-week range ₹16.65 to ₹40.80 · 1-year volatility 54.1%

Was the rally earned?

-48%share price, 3 yearsEarnings-driven

Mostly earnings.

  • Per-share earnings took off 55 points, while the multiple moved less (P/E 37.1x to 40.5x).
  • The share count rose 23%.
Net profit growth: −40 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).−40 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: +6 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+6 ptsP/E changeShare count change: −15 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−15 ptsShare count changeShare price: −48%−48%Share priceNet profit growth: −40 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).−40ProfitP/E change: +6 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+6P/EShare count change: −15 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−15SharesShare price: −48%−48%Share price
Net profit growth-40 ptsNet profit fell about 42%, which lowers the price.
P/E change+6 ptsThe P/E rose from 37.1x to 40.5x, which lifts the price.
Share count change-15 ptsShare count rose 23%, which lowers the price.
-34%share price, 5 yearsEarnings-driven

Mostly earnings.

  • Per-share earnings took off 55 points, while the multiple moved less (P/E 31.5x to 40.5x).
  • The share count rose 67%.
Net profit growth: −13 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).−13 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: +21 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+21 ptsP/E changeShare count change: −42 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−42 ptsShare count changeShare price: −34%−34%Share priceNet profit growth: −13 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).−13ProfitP/E change: +21 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+21P/EShare count change: −42 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−42SharesShare price: −34%−34%Share price
Net profit growth-13 ptsNet profit fell about 15%, which lowers the price.
P/E change+21 ptsThe P/E rose from 31.5x to 40.5x, which lifts the price.
Share count change-42 ptsShare count rose 67%, which lowers the price.
What do "pts" mean?

"pts" are percentage points of the share price return. The parts add up to the total shown for each period. Because price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count, higher profit pushes the price up, a higher P/E pushes it up, and more shares push it down.

Example: if the price rose 34% and profit growth accounts for +58 pts while a lower P/E accounts for -24 pts, then 58 - 24 = 34. The +58 is not the profit growth rate itself: it is the part of the price move that profit growth explains.

Not shown for 1 year: earnings were negative at one end, or there is not enough history.

Net profit is trailing twelve months as reported with a 60-day lag.

Compare this with SUN PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES

How rough has the ride been?

Maximum drawdown-81.5%not yet recovered
1-year volatility54.1%annualised
Beta vs sector index1.193-year daily, correlation 0.33
Volume spikes13last 90 sessions, 5x the 50-day median

Drawdown from peak

0%−25%−50%−75%20222023202420252026−80.1% 0%−25%−50%−75%20242026−80.1%
Largest drawdowns

-81.5% (2024-02 peak to 2026-03 low, not yet recovered)

-64.7% (2021-11 peak to 2023-03 low, recovered 2024-01)

Most recent volume spikes

2026-09-21: 5.6x the 50-day median, price +5.1% that day

2026-09-18: 9.8x the 50-day median, price +0.9% that day

2026-09-17: 8x the 50-day median, price -5.9% that day

Beta is the slope of daily returns against a market-cap-weighted index of the sector's other listed companies, built from today's constituents (so it excludes companies no longer listed).

Is it expensive against its own past and its peers?

40.5xP/E todayNear its historic high
Against its own history97th percentile
CheapestMedian 22.7xDearest

Usual range 18.5x to 36.3x since 2021-11.

Against Health Technology40.5x vs 37.0x
This company
40.5x
Sector median
37.0x

9% above the Health Technology median.

15.2x24.5x33.7x43.0xNov '21Nov '22Nov '23Nov '24Nov '25Nov '2615.2x24.5x33.7x43.0xNov '21Jul '23Mar '25Nov '26
P/E (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianHealth Technology median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/B (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianHealth Technology median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/S (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianHealth Technology median
How to read this

Shaded band: 10th to 90th percentile of the company's own P/E history; dotted line: its median; orange line: sector median (companies with a positive multiple, at least 5 in the sector).

Sector figures are built from today's listed companies, so they exclude companies that are no longer listed.

All terms explained in the glossary →

How Health Technology is valued

Where does it rank among Health Technology peers?

Each cell is the company's percentile rank among its Health Technology peers (non-financial companies) that month.
Darker is better-ranked.
Rows marked ↓ are inverted (lower debt, shorter cash cycle and a lower P/E rank higher).

Where it ranks today

  • ROCE24th▼ 32 pts vs a year ago
  • Op. margin39th▼ 15 pts vs a year ago
  • Revenue growth7th▼ 81 pts vs a year ago
  • EPS growth7th▼ 52 pts vs a year ago
  • Debt/equity ↓41st▼ 6 pts vs a year ago
  • Cash cycle ↓40th▲ 16 pts vs a year ago
  • P/E ↓44th
  • 12M momentum7th▼ 28 pts vs a year ago

Rank history

ROCE
Op. margin
Revenue growth
EPS growth
Debt/equity ↓
Cash cycle ↓
P/E ↓
12M momentum
Dec '21Jul '22Jan '23Jul '23Jan '24Jul '24Jan '25Jul '25Jan '26Jul '26Nov '26
Lower rank Higher rank Not enough data

Percentiles use today's listed companies in the sector and need at least 5 peers with a value; grey cells have too few.
ROE is computed from net profit and book value where the source does not report it.

The Health Technology sector page Watch it move against Health Technology in the Observatory

What is the price implying?

~24%annual earnings growth implied by the priceAbove delivered growth

At normalised P/E (five-year average earnings) of 41.6x, a holder earning 12%/yr needs earnings to grow about 23.7%/yr for 10 years, then trade at 15x.

Delivered−5.6%/yrEPS, last 9 fiscal years · 3-yr avg to 3-yr avg
Gap+29.4 ptsimplied minus delivered
Rank57thmost demanding of 856

Over time

Implied growth by month (solid) and delivered growth (dashed).

-6%11%28% Nov 2021Nov 2026 -6%11%28% Nov 2021Nov 2026

Change the assumptions

Exit P/E / return11%12%13%
12x25.4%26.5%27.6%
15x22.6%23.7%24.8%
20x19.2%20.3%21.4%

Drag a slider to test other assumptions

Implied: 23.7%/yr

“Implied growth” is what the current price would require under our stated assumptions, not what we expect. How this is calculated and the market-wide lists.

What prices imply across Health Technology The market-wide Expectations lists

Key figures

Share Priceclose 9 Nov
₹27.14
P/E
40.5x
ROCE
6.0%
Market Cap
₹1035 cr
Revenue (TTM)
₹471 cr
P/S
2.2x
P/B
2.0x
ROE
4.9%
Operating Margin
13.6%
Debt / Equity
0.3x
Promoter Holding
36.7%
12M Momentum
-28.9%

52-week range

₹16.65₹40.80
43% of the way from its 52-week low to its high

Price risk

1Y volatility
54.1%
Beta vs sector
1-year daily
1.15

Balance sheet & cash

Interest cover
operating profit ÷ interest
2.7x
Cash from profit, 3Y
operating cash flow ÷ net profit
-0.07x
low
Share count, 1Y
unchanged

Are profits backed by cash?

3 of 7checks within range2 beyond a threshold
Other income reliance35%Near threshold

Other income as a share of pre-tax profit (trailing twelve months): 34.6%. Bands: below 15%, 15% to 35%, above 35%.

Tax rate19%Within range

Median quarterly effective tax rate over about 2.5 years: 19.3%. Bands: 15% to 35%, 5% to 15% or 35% to 50%, outside 5% to 50%.

Cash conversion-0.07xBeyond threshold

Operating cash flow divided by net profit over the last three fiscal years: -0.07x (cash from operations ₹-3 cr, net profit ₹44 cr). Bands: 0.8x and above, 0.5x to 0.8x, below 0.5x.

Free cash flow0 of 5 yrsBeyond threshold

Fiscal years with positive free cash flow in the last 5: 0. Bands: at least 80% of years, 40% to 80%, below 40%.

Receivable days vs history+34 daysNear threshold

Debtor days are above the median of the previous three fiscal years by 34 days (171 vs 137). Bands: under 15 days, 15 to 45, over 45.

Capital work in progress10% of fixed assetsWithin range

Capital work-in-progress is 10% of fixed assets. Bands: not rising or up to 30%; rising for three years and above 30%; rising and above 60%.

Payable days-3 days / 2 yrsWithin range

Days payable changed by -3 over two years. Bands: rise of up to 30 days; more than 30 days.

Tap a check to see how it is measured

How to read this

Each check is a named rule with fixed thresholds, not a score. Annual statements are the latest restated figures, so a past year may differ from what was originally reported.

All terms explained in the glossary →

Who has been buying and selling?

  • Over 3 years, promoters trimmed 11.8 pts.
  • The number of shareholders rose from 79,862 to 1.9 lakh (+137%) between Sep 2023 and Jun 2026.

Holdings, Jun '26

How each group changed

GroupSep '23Jun '26Change
Promoters48.5%36.7%-11.8 pts
FIIs0.9%1.3%+0.3 pts
DIIs—0.0%—
Public and others50.6%62.0%+11.5 pts

Number of shareholders

1.9 lakhshareholders+137% since Sep '23
80k1.2L1.6L2.1L Sep '23Jun '24Mar '25Dec '25Jun '26
Sep '23: 79,862
Dec '23: 97,053
Mar '24: 1.4 lakh
Jun '24: 1.4 lakh
Sep '24: 1.5 lakh
Dec '24: 1.6 lakh
Mar '25: 1.6 lakh
Jun '25: 1.5 lakh
Sep '25: 2.1 lakh
Dec '25: 1.9 lakh
Mar '26: 1.9 lakh
Jun '26: 1.9 lakh
80k1.2L1.6L2.1L Sep '23Sep '24Sep '25Jun '26
Sep '23: 79,862
Dec '23: 97,053
Mar '24: 1.4 lakh
Jun '24: 1.4 lakh
Sep '24: 1.5 lakh
Dec '24: 1.6 lakh
Mar '25: 1.6 lakh
Jun '25: 1.5 lakh
Sep '25: 2.1 lakh
Dec '25: 1.9 lakh
Mar '26: 1.9 lakh
Jun '26: 1.9 lakh

Quarterly shareholding as reported, labelled by the quarter it covers (it becomes visible about two months later).
Shareholder counts are only available for recent quarters.

This quarter's smart-money board

What happened next to similar setups

0%typical 12-month return vs the marketNot meaningfully different from the base rate
  • We found 50 past situations where a non-financial company looked like SIGACHI INDUSTRIES LIMITED today on valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, price momentum, size and volatility.
  • Over the following 12 months the middle half of them returned −26% to +49% vs the market, against 0% for all non-financial companies in the same months.
  • The gap against the base rate (−0.2%, 80% range −10.4% to +15.4%) is within what chance and overlapping periods produce.

Where the 50 outcomes landed

−100%−50%0%+50%+100%
PAVNAIND · Jun 2025: −59.1% vs market
GSLSU · Mar 2024: −54.9% vs market
EXXARO · Oct 2023: −48.3% vs market
SUMIT · Sep 2025: −46.3% vs market
RTNPOWER · Sep 2025: −38.9% vs market
SOUTHWEST · Sep 2023: −36.4% vs market
ALKALI · Nov 2023: −36.2% vs market
KABRAEXTRU · Feb 2025: −34.7% vs market
FAIRCHEMOR · Jun 2025: −33.3% vs market
RUPA · Jul 2023: −28.7% vs market
MEDICAMEQ · Oct 2025: −28.1% vs market
JTEKTINDIA · Feb 2021: −27.3% vs market
KOKUYOCMLN · May 2024: −27.0% vs market
AHLADA · Aug 2022: −24.2% vs market
PRECAM · Aug 2024: −24.1% vs market
GOCLCORP · Aug 2024: −20.3% vs market
DMCC · Jun 2024: −18.8% vs market
NELCAST · Apr 2021: −18.1% vs market
THEINVEST · Feb 2022: −17.1% vs market
JAICORPLTD · Nov 2020: −9.9% vs market
OMINFRAL · Feb 2020: −9.1% vs market
BLKASHYAP · Oct 2025: −6.7% vs market
SEMAC · Jul 2021: −2.1% vs market
KCPSUGIND · Jun 2022: −2.0% vs market
OAL · May 2024: −0.2% vs market
DPSCLTD · Mar 2023: +0.1% vs market
SOLARA · Oct 2025: +11.5% vs market
NRBBEARING · Jul 2020: +14.9% vs market
BHAGERIA · May 2024: +15.5% vs market
SANGHIIND · Nov 2020: +17.9% vs market
ORIENTCER · Sep 2025: +20.8% vs market
LIBERTSHOE · Oct 2023: +21.9% vs market
MMFL · Dec 2020: +28.9% vs market
UNICHEMLAB · Jun 2022: +29.7% vs market
BEML · Jul 2020: +29.8% vs market
MANINFRA · Mar 2020: +39.9% vs market
KCP · Aug 2020: +45.8% vs market
SWELECTES · Apr 2020: +50.1% vs market
ARVSMART · Jun 2021: +50.4% vs market
NIPPOBATRY · Dec 2022: +53.6% vs market
TPLPLASTEH · Nov 2022: +58.3% vs market
HBLENGINE · Jan 2020: +61.4% vs market
TIRUMALCHM · Jun 2020: +77.4% vs market
SRHHYPOLTD · Mar 2020: +79.2% vs market
ACLGATI · May 2020: +88.9% vs market
NEULANDLAB · Sep 2022: +133.1% vs market
ANANTRAJ · Sep 2020: +157.7% vs market
GENUSPOWER · Sep 2022: +174.1% vs market
IGPL · Jul 2020: +181.9% vs market
SHAILY · Dec 2023: +264.3% vs market
Similar setups 0%All companies +0.2%← worse than the marketbetter than the market →

Each dot is one past situation (hover or tap for details) · Solid dots are the closest matches, listed below · Shaded is the middle half of all companies in the same months · 5 beyond the range shown, drawn at the edge

Similar setups' median
0%
All companies' median
+0.2%
Beat the market
50% vs 50%

50 past situations · 50 companies · 35 months · 2020–2025

The closest matches

CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
MEDICAMEQ
Health Technology
Oct 2025 51x6% −30%−38% −28%
THEINVEST
Finance
Feb 2022 33x7% −2%−28% −17%
SWELECTES
Producer Manufacturing
Apr 2020 19x1% −49%−57% +50%
DMCC
Process Industries
Jun 2024 68x8% 0%−16% −19%
NRBBEARING
Producer Manufacturing
Jul 2020 24x9% −24%−38% +15%
Show the other 3 matches
CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
ANANTRAJ
Consumer Durables
Sep 2020 20x1% −8%−21% +158%
NEULANDLAB
Health Technology
Sep 2022 27x10% −12%−25% +133%
DPSCLTD
Utilities
Mar 2023 65x3% −23%−37% 0%
How reliable is this?

Matched on P/E, P/S, ROCE, operating margin, debt/equity, interest cover, revenue growth, 12-month momentum, drawdown from 12-month high, size and volatility. Closest on: drawdown from 12-month high, 12-month momentum and ROCE. One match per company and at most 7 from any one month.

Independent periods: the matches fall in 6 distinct 12-month windows. Matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, so fewer windows means less evidence.

How this is built

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to SIGACHI INDUSTRIES LIMITED. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

Methodology

How historical analogs are built

Data as of 2026-11-09. Outcome pool: Jan 2020 to Oct 2025.

For every company we look at the situation it is in today (valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, 12-month price momentum, drawdown, size and volatility) and find past company-months that looked most like it. We then show what happened to those past situations over the following 12 months, measured against the ApnaFunda All index and against the base rate. It describes history. It does not predict anything.

What is compared

FeatureWeightNon-financialFinancial
P/E1yesyes
P/S1yes—
P/B1—yes
ROCE1yes—
operating margin1yes—
ROE1—yes
debt/equity0.75yes—
interest cover0.5yes—
revenue growth0.75yesyes
12-month momentum1yesyes
drawdown from 12-month high0.75yesyes
size0.75yesyes
volatility0.5yesyes

Weights were set by judgement before any outcome was looked at and are never tuned on results. Loss-making companies (negative P/E or net profit) are only matched with other loss-making companies. Banks, NBFCs and insurers are compared only with each other and use a different feature set. Every feature is converted, month by month, to its rank among companies in the same pool in that month, so a P/E of 30 in a hot market and a P/E of 22 in a cold one can match if both were equally expensive for their time. Only that month's data is used.

How closeness and the sample are defined

Distance is the weighted root-mean-square gap between the standardised features both companies have. A match needs at least 70% of the query's feature weight, a distance of at most 0.9, and 30 matches at minimum to be shown. We keep up to 50 matches with these exclusions: never the company itself, one match per company (its closest month), and at most 7 from any one calendar month so a single market episode cannot dominate.

Base rate

The base rate is the distribution of 12-month returns, relative to the market, of every eligible company-month in the same pool, with each month weighted to match the months the analogs came from. It answers: how did a random company do in these same months? Because matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, we also report the number of distinct 12-month windows behind a result, and a bootstrap that resamples months decides whether the analog median differs from the base rate at all. "Not meaningfully different" is the usual outcome and the page copy is written for it.

Limits you should know

  • One market period. The outcome pool covers 2020–2025 only (70 months), including the 2020 crash and the 2020–21 rally.
  • Survivorship. Only companies listed today are included. Delisted and bankrupt companies are missing, which flatters past outcomes, particularly for distressed-looking setups.
  • Price return only. Dividends are excluded, and the benchmark is an ApnaFunda market-cap-weighted index of the same listed companies, not an official index.
  • Reporting lag. Fundamentals are matched on an assumed 60-day lag after the quarter end, not on real announcement dates.
  • Pools: non-financial: 98,395 company-months from 2019 companies; financial: 5,659 company-months from 108 companies. 2349 companies currently have a result; the rest are suppressed because too few comparable situations exist.

Does it work? A walk-forward check

The walk-forward check has not been run for this build, so skill is shown as not yet measured.

Disclaimer

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to any company shown. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

What else looks like this?

Companies with the most similar financial profile today, regardless of industry.

Process Industries
78%similar
ROCEdebt/equity
Consumer Services
71%similar
revenue growthdebt/equity
Process Industries
64%similar
ROCEP/E
TIRUPATI FORGETIRUPATIFL
Producer Manufacturing
64%similar
debt/equityvolatility
HUBTOWNHUBTOWN
Finance
63%similar
promoter holdingrevenue
KOPRANKOPRAN
Health Technology
73%similar
debt/equityROCE
Health Technology
49%similar
promoter holdingoperating margin
Health Technology
48%similar
market caprevenue

Similarity is statistical, based on reported metrics; it does not imply similar business quality or future returns.

What changed?

30 events since Jan '24

  1. SepResultsEPS (TTM) turned positive.
  2. SepValuationP/E crossed above the 90th percentile of its own history to date (43.0x).
  3. AugPeer rankSlipped to the bottom quartile of Health Technology on ROCE (from the 3rd quartile).
  4. AugPriceVolume reached 22.3x its 50-day median on 2026-08-25; price +11.2% that day.
  5. JunPromoterPromoter holding fell 3.0 pts to 36.7% (largest drop since 2025-12).
  6. JunPeer rankSlipped to the 3rd quartile of Health Technology on ROCE (from the 2nd quartile).
  7. JunDividendDividend payout cut from 5% to -5% of profit.
  8. MarPriceFell 82% from the Feb 2024 peak to the Mar 2026 low.
Show 22 earlier events
  1. JanPriceVolume reached 11.0x its 50-day median on 2026-01-27; price -12.3% that day.
  2. DecPromoterPromoter holding fell 3.7 pts to 40.5% (largest drop in the history since 2019-01).
  3. DecInstitutionsFII + DII holding rose 3.0 pts over 2 quarters to 3.1%.
  4. DecPeer rankSlipped to the bottom quartile of Health Technology on operating margin (from the 2nd quartile).
  5. NovPriceVolume reached 36.8x its 50-day median on 2025-11-28; price +10.5% that day.
  6. SepResultsEPS (TTM) turned negative.
  7. SepPeer rankSlipped to the bottom quartile of Health Technology on EPS growth (from the 2nd quartile).
  8. SepPriceVolume reached 48.1x its 50-day median on 2025-09-12; price +13.7% that day.
  9. JulValuationP/E fell below the 10th percentile of its own history to date (18.5x).
  10. JulSharesShare count is up 15.2% over 12 months.
  11. JunResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned positive.
  12. JunPeer rankMoved into the 2nd quartile of Health Technology on EPS growth (from the bottom quartile).
  13. MayPriceVolume reached 8.3x its 50-day median on 2025-05-28; price +6.9% that day.
  14. MarValuationP/E fell below the 10th percentile of its own history to date (16.4x).
  15. MarPeer rankMoved into the 2nd quartile of Health Technology on operating margin (from the 3rd quartile).
  16. DecPeer rankSlipped to the 3rd quartile of Health Technology on operating margin (from the 2nd quartile).
  17. NovPriceVolume reached 9.3x its 50-day median on 2024-11-29; price +5.5% that day.
  18. JulPriceVolume reached 9.5x its 50-day median on 2024-07-25; price +10.1% that day.
  19. JunResultsEPS (TTM) turned positive.
  20. JunSharesShare count is up 6.5% over 12 months.
  21. MarPromoterPromoter holding fell 2.4 pts to 46.1%.
  22. JanPriceRegained the 2021-11 peak, 10 months after the low.

Events are generated from the data by fixed rules.
The month shown is when the change became visible in the reported figures, assuming a 60-day lag after each quarter end; it is not an announcement date.

Where price and fundamentals disagree, market-wide Rewind the whole market to any month

Monthly history61 months · 2021-11 to 2026-11
MonthP/ERevenue (TTM)ROEROCEDebt / Equity
2026-1140.5x₹471 cr4.9%6.0%0.3x
2026-1039.3x₹471 cr5.0%6.0%0.3x
2026-0943.0x₹471 cr5.0%6.0%0.3x
2026-08—₹478 cr-15.9%6.0%0.3x
2026-07—₹478 cr-15.9%6.0%0.3x
2026-06—₹478 cr-15.9%6.0%0.3x
2026-05—₹484 cr-12.4%16.0%0.2x
2026-04—₹484 cr-12.4%16.0%0.2x
2026-03—₹484 cr-12.4%16.0%0.2x
2026-02—₹506 cr-8.9%16.0%0.2x
2026-01—₹506 cr-8.9%16.0%0.2x
2025-12—₹506 cr-8.9%16.0%0.2x
2025-11—₹521 cr-7.2%16.0%0.2x
2025-10—₹521 cr-7.2%16.0%0.2x
2025-09—₹521 cr-7.2%16.0%0.2x
2025-0815.2x₹488 cr11.7%16.0%0.2x
2025-0718.5x₹488 cr11.7%16.0%0.2x
2025-0623.9x₹488 cr11.7%16.0%0.2x
2025-0524.6x₹464 cr16.2%17.0%0.4x
2025-0419.4x₹464 cr16.2%17.0%0.4x
2025-0316.4x₹464 cr16.2%17.0%0.4x
2025-0219.0x₹436 cr15.1%17.0%0.4x
2025-0122.7x₹436 cr15.1%17.0%0.4x
2024-1224.8x₹436 cr15.1%17.0%0.4x
2024-1129.1x₹410 cr13.8%17.0%0.4x
2024-1026.6x₹410 cr13.8%17.0%0.4x
2024-0929.8x₹410 cr13.8%17.0%0.4x
2024-0834.5x₹399 cr13.3%17.0%0.4x
2024-0738.5x₹399 cr13.3%17.0%0.4x
2024-0634.7x₹399 cr13.3%17.0%0.4x
2024-05—₹302 cr16.4%20.0%0.3x
2024-04—₹302 cr16.4%20.0%0.3x
2024-03—₹302 cr16.4%20.0%0.3x
2024-02—₹302 cr16.4%20.0%0.3x
2024-01—₹302 cr16.4%20.0%0.3x
2023-12—₹302 cr16.4%20.0%0.3x
2023-11—₹302 cr16.4%20.0%0.3x
2023-10—₹302 cr16.4%20.0%0.3x
2023-09—₹302 cr16.4%20.0%0.3x
2023-08—₹302 cr16.4%20.0%0.3x
2023-07—₹302 cr16.4%20.0%0.3x
2023-06—₹302 cr16.4%20.0%0.3x
2023-0518.3x₹250 cr17.5%28.0%0.2x
2023-0418.8x₹250 cr17.5%28.0%0.2x
2023-0317.2x₹250 cr17.5%28.0%0.2x
2023-0219.5x₹250 cr17.5%28.0%0.2x
2023-0123.8x₹250 cr17.5%28.0%0.2x
2022-1220.8x₹250 cr17.5%28.0%0.2x
2022-1122.7x₹250 cr17.5%28.0%0.2x
2022-1020.5x₹250 cr17.5%28.0%0.2x
2022-0920.7x₹250 cr17.5%28.0%0.2x
2022-0822.5x₹250 cr17.5%28.0%0.2x
2022-0718.8x₹250 cr17.5%28.0%0.2x
2022-0620.3x₹250 cr17.5%28.0%0.2x
2022-0521.0x₹193 cr31.6%38.0%0.2x
2022-0422.3x₹193 cr31.6%38.0%0.2x
2022-0322.1x₹193 cr31.6%38.0%0.2x
2022-0223.0x₹193 cr31.6%38.0%0.2x
2022-0125.8x₹193 cr31.6%38.0%0.2x
2021-1230.5x₹193 cr31.6%38.0%0.2x
2021-1131.5x₹193 cr31.6%38.0%0.2x

Methodology and data notes

Methodology

Methodology and data notes

All figures come from public exchange prices and screener.in financial statements. Quarterly and annual results are shown from 60 days after the period end, so a month never uses a result before it would plausibly have been published. Statements are the latest versions, which may include later restatements.

Sector medians, percentiles and indices use today's listed companies in the sector (survivorship bias). Prices are adjusted for splits and bonus issues; around a corporate action the fundamentals may lag the price by up to a month, and affected sections are hidden.

The return decomposition uses price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count. The reverse DCF uses a fixed 12% cost of equity, a 10-year horizon and a 15x terminal P/E, and is an illustration only. Events, flags and twins follow fixed rules and thresholds described next to each section.

Feedback