अApnaFunda

AZAD ENGINEERING LIMITED (AZAD)

Producer Manufacturing · Metal Fabrication · figures to Nov '26

Quality scoreHow the business itself ranks against its sector peers on profitability, 3-year growth and leverage. 50 is the middle of the sector.62 / 100
Profitability 68Balance sheet 57
Momentum scoreHow strong the recent trend is: 3-month price change, 12-month improvement in earnings and the rise in FII + DII holding, among companies above ₹500 cr.45 / 100
Price 54Earnings 62FII/DII 20

Passes these screensHigh MomentumLittle growth priced in

Share price

Closing priceAdjusted for splits and bonus issues.

₹2,434.2 latest close · +13.3% over the last 90 sessions

₹2,500₹3,000Jul 3Jul 29Aug 24Sep 17Oct 14Nov 9 ₹2,500₹3,000Jul 3Sep 4Nov 9

₹2,434.2 month-end · +44.8% over 12 months

₹1,500₹2,000₹2,500₹3,000Nov '25Jan '26Apr '26Jun '26Sep '26Nov '26 ₹1,500₹2,000₹2,500₹3,000Nov '25May '26Nov '26

₹2,434.2 month-end · +251.7% since Dec '23

₹1,000₹2,000₹3,000Dec '23Jul '24Feb '25Sep '25Apr '26Nov '26 ₹1,000₹2,000₹3,000Dec '23Jun '25Nov '26

52-week range ₹1360.00 to ₹3127.90 · 1-year volatility 44.4%

Was the rally earned?

+45%share price, 1 yearEarnings-driven

Mostly yes.

  • Per-share earnings added 35 points to the rise, while the multiple moved less (P/E 104.3x to 113.1x).
  • The share count rose 5%.
Net profit growth: +41 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+41 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: +10 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+10 ptsP/E changeShare count change: −6 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−6 ptsShare count changeShare price: +45%+45%Share priceNet profit growth: +41 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+41ProfitP/E change: +10 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+10P/EShare count change: −6 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−6SharesShare price: +45%+45%Share price
Net profit growth+41 ptsNet profit rose about 40%, which lifts the price.
P/E change+10 ptsThe P/E rose from 104.3x to 113.1x, which lifts the price.
Share count change-6 ptsShare count rose 5%, which lowers the price.
What do "pts" mean?

"pts" are percentage points of the share price return. The parts add up to the total shown for each period. Because price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count, higher profit pushes the price up, a higher P/E pushes it up, and more shares push it down.

Example: if the price rose 34% and profit growth accounts for +58 pts while a lower P/E accounts for -24 pts, then 58 - 24 = 34. The +58 is not the profit growth rate itself: it is the part of the price move that profit growth explains.

Not shown for 3 years and 5 years: earnings were negative at one end, or there is not enough history.

Net profit is trailing twelve months as reported with a 60-day lag.

Compare this with BHARAT FORGE

How rough has the ride been?

Maximum drawdown-39.6%recovered 2026-04
1-year volatility44.4%annualised
Beta vs sector index1.273-year daily, correlation 0.56
Volume spikes4last 90 sessions, 5x the 50-day median

Drawdown from peak

0%−10%−20%−30%20252026−35.7% 0%−10%−20%−30%20252026−35.7%
Largest drawdowns

-39.6% (2024-06 peak to 2025-02 low, recovered 2026-04)

-20.9% (2026-10 peak to 2026-11 low, not yet recovered)

-17.4% (2026-05 peak to 2026-05 low, recovered 2026-07)

Most recent volume spikes

2026-09-30: 13.5x the 50-day median, price +1.7% that day

2026-09-29: 13x the 50-day median, price +7.0% that day

2026-08-17: 5.8x the 50-day median, price +6.7% that day

Beta is the slope of daily returns against a market-cap-weighted index of the sector's other listed companies, built from today's constituents (so it excludes companies no longer listed).

Is it expensive against its own past and its peers?

113.1xP/E todayWithin its usual range
Against its own history42nd percentile
CheapestMedian 117.0xDearest

Usual range 97.1x to 638.7x since 2023-12.

Against Producer Manufacturing113.1x vs 29.6x
This company
113.1x
Sector median
29.6x

283% above the Producer Manufacturing median.

25.3x310.1x594.9x879.8xDec '23Jul '24Feb '25Sep '25Apr '26Nov '2625.3x310.1x594.9x879.8xDec '23Dec '24Dec '25Nov '26
P/E (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianProducer Manufacturing median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/B (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianProducer Manufacturing median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/S (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianProducer Manufacturing median
How to read this

Shaded band: 10th to 90th percentile of the company's own P/E history; dotted line: its median; orange line: sector median (companies with a positive multiple, at least 5 in the sector).

Sector figures are built from today's listed companies, so they exclude companies that are no longer listed.

All terms explained in the glossary →

How Producer Manufacturing is valued

Where does it rank among Producer Manufacturing peers?

Each cell is the company's percentile rank among its Producer Manufacturing peers (non-financial companies) that month.
Darker is better-ranked.
Rows marked ↓ are inverted (lower debt, shorter cash cycle and a lower P/E rank higher).

Where it ranks today

  • ROCE36th▲ 4 pts vs a year ago
  • Op. margin99thflat vs a year ago
  • Revenue growth79th▼ 9 pts vs a year ago
  • EPS growth72nd▼ 8 pts vs a year ago
  • Debt/equity ↓44th▼ 11 pts vs a year ago
  • Cash cycle ↓0thflat vs a year ago
  • P/E ↓6thflat vs a year ago
  • 12M momentum85th▲ 19 pts vs a year ago

Rank history

ROCE
Op. margin
Revenue growth
EPS growth
Debt/equity ↓
Cash cycle ↓
P/E ↓
12M momentum
Dec '21Jul '22Jan '23Jul '23Jan '24Jul '24Jan '25Jul '25Jan '26Jul '26Nov '26
Lower rank Higher rank Not enough data

Percentiles use today's listed companies in the sector and need at least 5 peers with a value; grey cells have too few.
ROE is computed from net profit and book value where the source does not report it.

The Producer Manufacturing sector page Watch it move against Producer Manufacturing in the Observatory

What is the price implying?

~48%annual earnings growth implied by the priceBelow delivered growth

At normalised P/E (five-year average earnings) of 249.8x, a holder earning 12%/yr needs earnings to grow about 48.4%/yr for 10 years, then trade at 15x.

Delivered60.3%/yrEPS, last 6 fiscal years · 3-yr avg to 3-yr avg
Gap−11.6 ptsimplied minus delivered
Rank720thmost demanding of 856

Over time

Implied growth by month (solid) and delivered growth (dashed).

0%30%60% Dec 2023Nov 2026 0%30%60% Dec 2023Nov 2026

Change the assumptions

Exit P/E / return11%12%13%
12x50.4%51.7%53.1%
15x47.1%48.4%49.7%
20x42.9%44.2%45.5%

Drag a slider to test other assumptions

Implied: 48.4%/yr

“Implied growth” is what the current price would require under our stated assumptions, not what we expect. How this is calculated and the market-wide lists.

What prices imply across Producer Manufacturing The market-wide Expectations lists

Key figures

Share Priceclose 9 Nov
₹2434.20
P/E
113.1x
ROCE
12.0%
Market Cap
₹15722 cr
Revenue (TTM)
₹640 cr
P/S
24.6x
P/B
10.3x
ROE
9.1%
Operating Margin
37.0%
Debt / Equity
0.3x
Promoter Holding
55.8%
12M Momentum
44.8%

52-week range

₹1360.00₹3127.90
61% of the way from its 52-week low to its high

Price risk

1Y volatility
44.4%
Beta vs sector
1-year daily
1.24

Balance sheet & cash

Interest cover
operating profit ÷ interest
6.3x
Cash from profit, 3Y
operating cash flow ÷ net profit
-0.26x
low
Share count, 1Y
unchanged

Are profits backed by cash?

2 of 7checks within range2 beyond a threshold
Other income reliance22%Near threshold

Other income as a share of pre-tax profit (trailing twelve months): 22.3%. Bands: below 15%, 15% to 35%, above 35%.

Tax rate30%Within range

Median quarterly effective tax rate over about 2.5 years: 30.0%. Bands: 15% to 35%, 5% to 15% or 35% to 50%, outside 5% to 50%.

Cash conversion-0.26xBeyond threshold

Operating cash flow divided by net profit over the last three fiscal years: -0.26x (cash from operations ₹-72 cr, net profit ₹280 cr). Bands: 0.8x and above, 0.5x to 0.8x, below 0.5x.

Free cash flow0 of 5 yrsBeyond threshold

Fiscal years with positive free cash flow in the last 5: 0. Bands: at least 80% of years, 40% to 80%, below 40%.

Receivable days vs history+9 daysWithin range

Debtor days are above the median of the previous three fiscal years by 9 days (189 vs 180). Bands: under 15 days, 15 to 45, over 45.

Capital work in progress33% of fixed assetsNear threshold

Capital work-in-progress is 33% of fixed assets. Bands: not rising or up to 30%; rising for three years and above 30%; rising and above 60%.

Payable days+140 days / 2 yrsNear threshold

Days payable changed by +140 over two years. Bands: rise of up to 30 days; more than 30 days.

Tap a check to see how it is measured

How to read this

Each check is a named rule with fixed thresholds, not a score. Annual statements are the latest restated figures, so a past year may differ from what was originally reported.

All terms explained in the glossary →

Who has been buying and selling?

  • Over 2 years, promoters trimmed 10.1 pts; FIIs added 8.6 pts; DIIs added 4.6 pts.

Holdings, Jun '26

How each group changed

GroupDec '23Jun '26Change
Promoters65.9%55.8%-10.1 pts
FIIs4.7%13.3%+8.6 pts
DIIs5.7%10.3%+4.6 pts
Public and others23.7%20.5%-3.2 pts

Number of shareholders

1.3 lakhshareholders-1% since Dec '23
1.0L1.1L1.2L1.4L Dec '23Jun '24Dec '24Jun '25Dec '25Jun '26
Dec '23: 1.4 lakh
Mar '24: 1.1 lakh
Jun '24: 1.0 lakh
Sep '24: 1.3 lakh
Dec '24: 1.2 lakh
Mar '25: 1.2 lakh
Jun '25: 1.3 lakh
Sep '25: 1.3 lakh
Dec '25: 1.3 lakh
Mar '26: 1.3 lakh
Jun '26: 1.3 lakh
1.0L1.1L1.2L1.4L Dec '23Dec '24Dec '25Jun '26
Dec '23: 1.4 lakh
Mar '24: 1.1 lakh
Jun '24: 1.0 lakh
Sep '24: 1.3 lakh
Dec '24: 1.2 lakh
Mar '25: 1.2 lakh
Jun '25: 1.3 lakh
Sep '25: 1.3 lakh
Dec '25: 1.3 lakh
Mar '26: 1.3 lakh
Jun '26: 1.3 lakh

Quarterly shareholding as reported, labelled by the quarter it covers (it becomes visible about two months later).
Shareholder counts are only available for recent quarters.

This quarter's smart-money board

What happened next to similar setups

−7.3%typical 12-month return vs the marketNot meaningfully different from the base rate
  • We found 50 past situations where a non-financial company looked like AZAD ENGINEERING LIMITED today on valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, price momentum, size and volatility.
  • Over the following 12 months the middle half of them returned −23% to +27% vs the market, against −7% for all non-financial companies in the same months.
  • The gap against the base rate (−0.8%, 80% range −6.7% to +7.2%) is within what chance and overlapping periods produce.

Where the 50 outcomes landed

−100%−50%0%+50%+100%
COHANCE · Jan 2025: −65.9% vs market
ANURAS · May 2023: −54.4% vs market
TASTYBITE · Aug 2023: −44.9% vs market
SUNTECK · May 2022: −43.1% vs market
ITI · Sep 2020: −39.1% vs market
JYOTICNC · Apr 2025: −34.7% vs market
MTARTECH · May 2023: −34.0% vs market
OLECTRA · May 2024: −33.0% vs market
MANINFRA · Mar 2022: −31.2% vs market
GENESYS · Sep 2024: −29.7% vs market
FLUOROCHEM · Nov 2022: −28.7% vs market
BORORENEW · Apr 2022: −26.5% vs market
HESTERBIO · May 2021: −23.7% vs market
SONACOMS · Jun 2022: −22.4% vs market
RATEGAIN · Nov 2023: −17.7% vs market
INDHOTEL · May 2025: −16.9% vs market
METROBRAND · Apr 2023: −16.1% vs market
CHALET · Jul 2025: −15.4% vs market
ARVSMART · Aug 2024: −13.9% vs market
VIPIND · Jul 2022: −13.4% vs market
MEDANTA · Feb 2024: −12.2% vs market
JSWINFRA · Oct 2024: −10.3% vs market
LODHA · Jun 2024: −9.8% vs market
GODREJPROP · Jan 2024: −9.4% vs market
ELGIEQUIP · Mar 2023: −7.6% vs market
VIJAYA · Feb 2025: −7.1% vs market
ANANTRAJ · Aug 2024: −6.0% vs market
PHOENIXLTD · Jan 2025: −4.1% vs market
ETHOSLTD · Feb 2024: +1.0% vs market
NEOGEN · Jun 2022: +3.2% vs market
HINDCOPPER · Sep 2024: +3.8% vs market
LAURUSLABS · Apr 2021: +4.2% vs market
TRENT · May 2020: +4.3% vs market
ASTRAMICRO · Jun 2024: +7.1% vs market
ZYDUSWELL · Jan 2020: +8.2% vs market
PARAS · Jun 2024: +11.1% vs market
POLYMED · Sep 2023: +16.0% vs market
SHILPAMED · Jul 2025: +30.6% vs market
PTCIL · Dec 2024: +30.8% vs market
MAXHEALTH · Jun 2022: +36.0% vs market
SOLARINDS · Apr 2022: +40.4% vs market
CHOICEIN · Jun 2023: +46.3% vs market
KAYNES · Mar 2024: +59.5% vs market
VBL · Jan 2023: +60.6% vs market
KPITTECH · Mar 2022: +62.1% vs market
MCX · May 2024: +73.0% vs market
SHAILY · Jun 2025: +73.7% vs market
APOLLO · Jul 2025: +113.1% vs market
ACUTAAS · May 2025: +160.5% vs market
ATGL · Feb 2020: +180.7% vs market
Similar setups −7.3%All companies −6.5%← worse than the marketbetter than the market →

Each dot is one past situation (hover or tap for details) · Solid dots are the closest matches, listed below · Shaded is the middle half of all companies in the same months · 3 beyond the range shown, drawn at the edge

Similar setups' median
−7.3%
All companies' median
−6.5%
Beat the market
44% vs 42%

50 past situations · 50 companies · 35 months · 2020–2025

The closest matches

CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
TRENT
Retail Trade
May 2020 160x11% +20%−41% +4%
METROBRAND
Retail Trade
Apr 2023 111x20% +52%−10% −16%
VIJAYA
Health Services
Feb 2025 71x20% +42%−26% −7%
NEOGEN
Process Industries
Jun 2022 73x14% +53%−32% +3%
MEDANTA
Health Services
Feb 2024 112x17% +162%−8% −12%
Show the other 3 matches
CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
PARAS
Electronic Technology
Jun 2024 171x10% +130%−3% +11%
LAURUSLABS
Health Technology
Apr 2021 95x14% +342%−5% +4%
OLECTRA
Consumer Durables
May 2024 219x13% +138%−18% −33%
How reliable is this?

Matched on P/E, P/S, ROCE, operating margin, debt/equity, interest cover, revenue growth, 12-month momentum, drawdown from 12-month high, size and volatility. Closest on: 12-month momentum, interest cover and drawdown from 12-month high. One match per company and at most 7 from any one month.

Independent periods: the matches fall in 6 distinct 12-month windows. Matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, so fewer windows means less evidence.

How this is built

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to AZAD ENGINEERING LIMITED. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

Methodology

How historical analogs are built

Data as of 2026-11-09. Outcome pool: Jan 2020 to Oct 2025.

For every company we look at the situation it is in today (valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, 12-month price momentum, drawdown, size and volatility) and find past company-months that looked most like it. We then show what happened to those past situations over the following 12 months, measured against the ApnaFunda All index and against the base rate. It describes history. It does not predict anything.

What is compared

FeatureWeightNon-financialFinancial
P/E1yesyes
P/S1yes—
P/B1—yes
ROCE1yes—
operating margin1yes—
ROE1—yes
debt/equity0.75yes—
interest cover0.5yes—
revenue growth0.75yesyes
12-month momentum1yesyes
drawdown from 12-month high0.75yesyes
size0.75yesyes
volatility0.5yesyes

Weights were set by judgement before any outcome was looked at and are never tuned on results. Loss-making companies (negative P/E or net profit) are only matched with other loss-making companies. Banks, NBFCs and insurers are compared only with each other and use a different feature set. Every feature is converted, month by month, to its rank among companies in the same pool in that month, so a P/E of 30 in a hot market and a P/E of 22 in a cold one can match if both were equally expensive for their time. Only that month's data is used.

How closeness and the sample are defined

Distance is the weighted root-mean-square gap between the standardised features both companies have. A match needs at least 70% of the query's feature weight, a distance of at most 0.9, and 30 matches at minimum to be shown. We keep up to 50 matches with these exclusions: never the company itself, one match per company (its closest month), and at most 7 from any one calendar month so a single market episode cannot dominate.

Base rate

The base rate is the distribution of 12-month returns, relative to the market, of every eligible company-month in the same pool, with each month weighted to match the months the analogs came from. It answers: how did a random company do in these same months? Because matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, we also report the number of distinct 12-month windows behind a result, and a bootstrap that resamples months decides whether the analog median differs from the base rate at all. "Not meaningfully different" is the usual outcome and the page copy is written for it.

Limits you should know

  • One market period. The outcome pool covers 2020–2025 only (70 months), including the 2020 crash and the 2020–21 rally.
  • Survivorship. Only companies listed today are included. Delisted and bankrupt companies are missing, which flatters past outcomes, particularly for distressed-looking setups.
  • Price return only. Dividends are excluded, and the benchmark is an ApnaFunda market-cap-weighted index of the same listed companies, not an official index.
  • Reporting lag. Fundamentals are matched on an assumed 60-day lag after the quarter end, not on real announcement dates.
  • Pools: non-financial: 98,395 company-months from 2019 companies; financial: 5,659 company-months from 108 companies. 2349 companies currently have a result; the rest are suppressed because too few comparable situations exist.

Does it work? A walk-forward check

The walk-forward check has not been run for this build, so skill is shown as not yet measured.

Disclaimer

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to any company shown. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

What else looks like this?

Companies with the most similar financial profile today, regardless of industry.

Health Technology
58%similar
market capROCE
Health Services
58%similar
promoter holdingROCE
Health Technology
57%similar
revenuedebt/equity
Electronic Technology
55%similar
P/Emarket cap
Health Technology
52%similar
ROCEmarket cap
Producer Manufacturing
59%similar
revenueP/E
Producer Manufacturing
47%similar
debt/equityrevenue
Producer Manufacturing
41%similar
P/Erevenue

Similarity is statistical, based on reported metrics; it does not imply similar business quality or future returns.

What changed?

22 events since Jun '24

  1. SepPeer rankSlipped to the 2nd quartile of Producer Manufacturing on EPS growth (from the top quartile).
  2. SepPriceVolume reached 13.5x its 50-day median on 2026-09-30; price +1.7% that day.
  3. AprPriceRegained the 2024-06 peak, 14 months after the low.
  4. AprPriceVolume reached 10.2x its 50-day median on 2026-04-23; price +8.2% that day.
  5. FebPriceVolume reached 9.1x its 50-day median on 2026-02-16; price +4.4% that day.
  6. JanSharesShare count is up 8.3% over 12 months.
  7. DecValuationP/E fell below the 10th percentile of its own history to date (93.7x).
  8. OctPriceVolume reached 13.0x its 50-day median on 2025-10-03; price +7.3% that day.
Show 14 earlier events
  1. SepPromoterPromoter holding fell 4.9 pts to 55.4% (largest drop since 2025-06).
  2. SepInstitutionsFII + DII holding rose 8.5 pts over 2 quarters to 25.1%.
  3. SepPeer rankMoved into the top quartile of Producer Manufacturing on EPS growth (from the 2nd quartile).
  4. SepPriceVolume reached 12.9x its 50-day median on 2025-09-19; price +1.3% that day.
  5. JunPromoterPromoter holding fell 5.6 pts to 60.3%.
  6. JunPeer rankSlipped to the 3rd quartile of Producer Manufacturing on ROCE (from the 2nd quartile).
  7. JunPriceVolume reached 43.7x its 50-day median on 2025-06-06; price -5.9% that day.
  8. FebPriceFell 40% from the Jun 2024 peak to the Feb 2025 low.
  9. DecInstitutionsFII + DII holding rose 3.5 pts over 2 quarters to 15.5%.
  10. DecDebtDebt / equity halved over 12 months to 0.06x.
  11. DecSharesShare count is up 200.0% over 12 months.
  12. NovPriceVolume reached 21.1x its 50-day median on 2024-11-04; price +7.9% that day.
  13. JulPriceVolume reached 7.2x its 50-day median on 2024-07-18; price -2.0% that day.
  14. JunDebtDebt / equity fell below 1.0x (0.06x).

Events are generated from the data by fixed rules.
The month shown is when the change became visible in the reported figures, assuming a 60-day lag after each quarter end; it is not an announcement date.

Where price and fundamentals disagree, market-wide Rewind the whole market to any month

Monthly history36 months · 2023-12 to 2026-11
MonthP/ERevenue (TTM)ROEROCEDebt / Equity
2026-11113.1x₹640 cr9.1%12.0%0.3x
2026-10113.6x₹640 cr9.2%12.0%0.3x
2026-09137.7x₹640 cr9.2%12.0%0.3x
2026-08139.1x₹604 cr8.8%12.0%0.3x
2026-07111.4x₹604 cr8.8%12.0%0.3x
2026-0699.9x₹604 cr8.8%12.0%0.3x
2026-05106.6x₹569 cr8.8%12.0%0.2x
2026-04114.4x₹569 cr8.8%12.0%0.2x
2026-0378.4x₹569 cr8.8%12.0%0.2x
2026-0297.2x₹530 cr8.0%12.0%0.2x
2026-0183.6x₹530 cr8.0%12.0%0.2x
2025-1293.7x₹530 cr8.0%12.0%0.2x
2025-11104.3x₹496 cr7.1%12.0%0.2x
2025-10105.3x₹496 cr7.1%12.0%0.2x
2025-0997.0x₹496 cr7.1%12.0%0.2x
2025-08106.2x₹457 cr6.2%12.0%0.2x
2025-07102.3x₹457 cr6.2%12.0%0.2x
2025-06115.5x₹457 cr6.2%12.0%0.2x
2025-05135.9x₹423 cr11.9%21.0%0.1x
2025-04121.1x₹423 cr11.9%21.0%0.1x
2025-03104.3x₹423 cr11.9%21.0%0.1x
2025-02107.8x₹392 cr10.9%21.0%0.1x
2025-01131.1x₹392 cr10.9%21.0%0.1x
2024-12145.7x₹392 cr10.9%21.0%0.1x
2024-11141.9x₹363 cr10.5%21.0%0.1x
2024-10118.5x₹363 cr10.5%21.0%0.1x
2024-09119.7x₹363 cr10.5%21.0%0.1x
2024-08143.1x₹341 cr9.0%21.0%0.1x
2024-07151.0x₹341 cr9.0%21.0%0.1x
2024-06176.1x₹341 cr9.0%21.0%0.1x
2024-05879.8x₹252 cr3.9%16.0%1.5x
2024-04782.3x₹252 cr3.9%16.0%1.5x
2024-03804.6x₹252 cr3.9%16.0%1.5x
2024-02712.0x₹252 cr3.9%16.0%1.5x
2024-01565.4x₹252 cr3.9%16.0%1.5x
2023-12407.1x₹252 cr3.9%16.0%1.5x

Methodology and data notes

Methodology

Methodology and data notes

All figures come from public exchange prices and screener.in financial statements. Quarterly and annual results are shown from 60 days after the period end, so a month never uses a result before it would plausibly have been published. Statements are the latest versions, which may include later restatements.

Sector medians, percentiles and indices use today's listed companies in the sector (survivorship bias). Prices are adjusted for splits and bonus issues; around a corporate action the fundamentals may lag the price by up to a month, and affected sections are hidden.

The return decomposition uses price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count. The reverse DCF uses a fixed 12% cost of equity, a 10-year horizon and a 15x terminal P/E, and is an illustration only. Events, flags and twins follow fixed rules and thresholds described next to each section.

Feedback