अApnaFunda

C P S SHAPERS LIMITED (CPS)

Consumer Non-Durables · Apparel/Footwear · figures to Nov '26

Quality scoreHow the business itself ranks against its sector peers on profitability, 3-year growth and leverage. 50 is the middle of the sector.28 / 100
Profitability 15Growth 5Balance sheet 63

Share price

Closing priceAdjusted for splits and bonus issues.

₹990 latest close · +4.2% over the last 90 sessions

₹1,000₹1,100₹1,200May 4Jun 10Jul 10Aug 18Sep 15Nov 9 ₹1,000₹1,100₹1,200May 4Jul 28Nov 9

₹990 month-end · +2.2% over 12 months

₹1,000₹1,100₹1,200Nov '25Jan '26Apr '26Jun '26Sep '26Nov '26 ₹1,000₹1,100₹1,200Nov '25May '26Nov '26

₹990 month-end · +113.4% over 3 years

₹500₹1,000Nov '23Jun '24Jan '25Sep '25Apr '26Nov '26 ₹500₹1,000Nov '23May '25Nov '26

₹990 month-end · +109.8% since Sep '23

₹500₹1,000Sep '23May '24Dec '24Aug '25Mar '26Nov '26 ₹500₹1,000Sep '23Apr '25Nov '26

52-week range ₹660.00 to ₹1349.25 · 1-year volatility 52.1%

Was the rally earned?

+2%share price, 1 yearRoughly flat
  • The share price was roughly flat over 1 year (+2%).
  • The share count rose 3%.
Net profit growth: −27 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).−27 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: +33 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+33 ptsP/E changeShare count change: −3 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−3 ptsShare count changeShare price: +2%+2%Share priceNet profit growth: −27 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).−27ProfitP/E change: +33 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+33P/EShare count change: −3 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−3SharesShare price: +2%+2%Share price
Net profit growth-27 ptsNet profit fell about 24%, which lowers the price.
P/E change+33 ptsThe P/E rose from 1258.3x to 1736.8x, which lifts the price.
Share count change-3 ptsShare count rose 3%, which lowers the price.
+113%share price, 3 yearsMultiple-driven

Partly.

  • Most of the rise came from investors paying a higher multiple (P/E 28.3x to 1736.8x); per-share earnings took off 503 points.
  • The share count rose 356%.
Net profit growth: −276 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).−276 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: +616 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+616 ptsP/E changeShare count change: −227 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−227 ptsShare count changeShare price: +113%+113%Share priceNet profit growth: −276 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).−276ProfitP/E change: +616 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+616P/EShare count change: −227 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−227SharesShare price: +113%+113%Share price
Net profit growth-276 ptsNet profit fell about 84%, which lowers the price.
P/E change+616 ptsThe P/E rose from 28.3x to 1736.8x, which lifts the price.
Share count change-227 ptsShare count rose 356%, which lowers the price.
What do "pts" mean?

"pts" are percentage points of the share price return. The parts add up to the total shown for each period. Because price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count, higher profit pushes the price up, a higher P/E pushes it up, and more shares push it down.

Example: if the price rose 34% and profit growth accounts for +58 pts while a lower P/E accounts for -24 pts, then 58 - 24 = 34. The +58 is not the profit growth rate itself: it is the part of the price move that profit growth explains.

Not shown for 5 years: earnings were negative at one end, or there is not enough history.

Net profit is trailing twelve months as reported with a 60-day lag.

Compare this with PAGE INDUSTRIES

How rough has the ride been?

Maximum drawdown-49.6%recovered 2024-11
1-year volatility52.1%annualised

Drawdown from peak

0%−20%−40%202420252026−47.7% 0%−20%−40%202420252026−47.7%
Largest drawdowns

-49.6% (2023-09 peak to 2024-08 low, recovered 2024-11)

-35.4% (2025-01 peak to 2025-03 low, recovered 2025-04)

-29.2% (2026-01 peak to 2026-04 low, not yet recovered)

Is it expensive against its own past and its peers?

1736.8xP/E todayNear its historic high
Against its own history87th percentile
CheapestMedian 189.5xDearest

Usual range 24.4x to 1762.5x since 2023-09.

Against Consumer Non-Durables1736.8x vs 26.8x
This company
1736.8x
Sector median
26.8x

6385% above the Consumer Non-Durables median.

17.6x684.3x1350.9x2017.5xSep '23May '24Jan '25Sep '25May '26Nov '2617.6x684.3x1350.9x2017.5xSep '23Oct '24Nov '25Nov '26
P/E (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianConsumer Non-Durables median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/B (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianConsumer Non-Durables median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/S (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianConsumer Non-Durables median
How to read this

Shaded band: 10th to 90th percentile of the company's own P/E history; dotted line: its median; orange line: sector median (companies with a positive multiple, at least 5 in the sector).

Sector figures are built from today's listed companies, so they exclude companies that are no longer listed.

All terms explained in the glossary →

How Consumer Non-Durables is valued

Where does it rank among Consumer Non-Durables peers?

Each cell is the company's percentile rank among its Consumer Non-Durables peers (non-financial companies) that month.
Darker is better-ranked.
Rows marked ↓ are inverted (lower debt, shorter cash cycle and a lower P/E rank higher).

Where it ranks today

  • ROCE15th▼ 3 pts vs a year ago
  • Revenue growth32nd▲ 26 pts vs a year ago
  • EPS growth17th▲ 11 pts vs a year ago
  • Debt/equity ↓52nd▲ 18 pts vs a year ago
  • Cash cycle ↓3rd▼ 8 pts vs a year ago
  • P/E ↓2ndflat vs a year ago
  • 12M momentum71st▼ 24 pts vs a year ago

Rank history

ROCE
Revenue growth
EPS growth
Debt/equity ↓
Cash cycle ↓
P/E ↓
12M momentum
Dec '21Jul '22Jan '23Jul '23Jan '24Jul '24Jan '25Jul '25Jan '26Jul '26Nov '26
Lower rank Higher rank Not enough data

Percentiles use today's listed companies in the sector and need at least 5 peers with a value; grey cells have too few.
ROE is computed from net profit and book value where the source does not report it.

The Consumer Non-Durables sector page Watch it move against Consumer Non-Durables in the Observatory

What is the price implying?

~47%annual earnings growth implied by the price

At a P/E of 222.7x, the price would imply about 46.7%/yr earnings growth for 10 years under the same assumptions, but it is not ranked.

Below the ₹1,000 cr market-cap floor used for the lists.

“Implied growth” is what the current price would require under our stated assumptions, not what we expect.

What prices imply across Consumer Non-Durables The market-wide Expectations lists

Key figures

Share Priceclose 9 Nov
₹990.00
P/E
1736.8x
ROCE
4.3%
Market Cap
₹229 cr
Revenue (TTM)
₹31 cr
P/S
7.3x
P/B
10.4x
ROE
0.6%
Debt / Equity
0.3x
Promoter Holding
64.9%
12M Momentum
2.2%

52-week range

₹660.00₹1349.25
48% of the way from its 52-week low to its high

Price risk

1Y volatility
52.1%
Beta vs sector
1-year daily
0.30

Balance sheet & cash

Interest cover
operating profit ÷ interest
1.4x
Cash from profit, 3Y
operating cash flow ÷ net profit
-2.00x
low
Share count, 1Y
+3.2%

Are profits backed by cash?

2 of 6checks within range3 beyond a threshold
Other income reliance28%Near threshold

Other income as a share of pre-tax profit (trailing twelve months): 28.1%. Bands: below 15%, 15% to 35%, above 35%.

Tax rate—Not enough data

Not enough reported data to compute this.

Cash conversion-6.29xBeyond threshold

Operating cash flow divided by net profit over the last three fiscal years: -6.29x (cash from operations ₹-6.5 cr, net profit ₹1 cr). Bands: 0.8x and above, 0.5x to 0.8x, below 0.5x.

Free cash flow1 of 5 yrsBeyond threshold

Fiscal years with positive free cash flow in the last 5: 1. Bands: at least 80% of years, 40% to 80%, below 40%.

Receivable days vs history+52 daysBeyond threshold

Debtor days are above the median of the previous three fiscal years by 52 days (87 vs 35). Bands: under 15 days, 15 to 45, over 45.

Capital work in progress0% of fixed assetsWithin range

Capital work-in-progress is 0% of fixed assets. Bands: not rising or up to 30%; rising for three years and above 30%; rising and above 60%.

Payable days+5 days / 2 yrsWithin range

Days payable changed by +5 over two years. Bands: rise of up to 30 days; more than 30 days.

Tap a check to see how it is measured

How to read this

Each check is a named rule with fixed thresholds, not a score. Annual statements are the latest restated figures, so a past year may differ from what was originally reported.

All terms explained in the glossary →

Who has been buying and selling?

  • Over 3 years, promoters trimmed 6.4 pts; DIIs trimmed 2.8 pts.
  • The number of shareholders fell from 406 to 307 (-24%) between Sep 2023 and Jun 2026.

Holdings, Jun '26

How each group changed

GroupSep '23Jun '26Change
Promoters71.3%64.9%-6.4 pts
FIIs———
DIIs2.8%0.0%-2.8 pts
Public and others25.9%35.1%+9.2 pts

Number of shareholders

307shareholders-24% since Sep '23
206273339406 Sep '23Mar '24Mar '25Sep '25Dec '25Jun '26
Sep '23: 406
Mar '24: 331
Mar '25: 206
Sep '25: 219
Dec '25: 306
Jun '26: 307
206273339406 Sep '23Mar '25Dec '25Jun '26
Sep '23: 406
Mar '24: 331
Mar '25: 206
Sep '25: 219
Dec '25: 306
Jun '26: 307

Quarterly shareholding as reported, labelled by the quarter it covers (it becomes visible about two months later).
Shareholder counts are only available for recent quarters.

This quarter's smart-money board

What happened next to similar setups

−13.9%typical 12-month return vs the marketBelow the base rate
  • We found 50 past situations where a non-financial company looked like C P S SHAPERS LIMITED today on valuation, return on capital, debt, growth, price momentum, size and volatility.
  • Over the following 12 months the middle half of them returned −40% to +28% vs the market, against −6% for all non-financial companies in the same months.
  • The analogs' median sat below that base rate (gap −8.2%, 80% range −16.3% to −1.3%), but the matches cluster in only 6 distinct 12-month windows.

Where the 50 outcomes landed

−100%−50%0%+50%+100%
ROSSELLIND · Dec 2023: −86.3% vs market
AKASH · May 2021: −83.9% vs market
URAVIDEF · Aug 2025: −76.9% vs market
KCK · Aug 2025: −68.5% vs market
VAKRANGEE · Apr 2024: −63.4% vs market
BROOKS · Sep 2025: −58.7% vs market
CAPACITE · Jul 2021: −55.9% vs market
DUGLOBAL · Nov 2024: −53.3% vs market
ORIENTLTD · Feb 2020: −45.6% vs market
BHANDARI · Feb 2024: −44.6% vs market
DPSCLTD · Jan 2024: −41.4% vs market
TOUCHWOOD · Aug 2021: −40.1% vs market
SINTERCOM · Aug 2025: −40.0% vs market
TASTYBITE · May 2023: −39.4% vs market
KHANDSE · Mar 2020: −39.3% vs market
EIFFL · Apr 2023: −38.9% vs market
RUCHINFRA · Oct 2023: −36.0% vs market
ATULAUTO · Jul 2024: −34.9% vs market
FCSSOFT · Dec 2023: −32.4% vs market
PILITA · Sep 2020: −30.2% vs market
CCHHL · Apr 2025: −20.5% vs market
SINCLAIR · Oct 2025: −18.8% vs market
MAANALU · Jun 2024: −16.6% vs market
YUKEN · May 2024: −15.1% vs market
APS · Apr 2025: −14.7% vs market
SALZERELEC · Feb 2020: −13.0% vs market
SOLARA · Jun 2025: −9.8% vs market
ASHIANA · Aug 2021: −8.4% vs market
SIYSIL · May 2022: −6.8% vs market
TEXINFRA · Nov 2023: −5.1% vs market
BHAGCHEM · Jun 2025: −3.5% vs market
TDPOWERSYS · Mar 2020: −3.2% vs market
IGARASHI · Apr 2023: −0.1% vs market
INOXGREEN · Jan 2025: 0% vs market
SOFTTECH · Aug 2025: +1.1% vs market
RAJTV · Jun 2020: +13.3% vs market
SAMBHAAV · Aug 2024: +20.4% vs market
AVALON · Feb 2025: +29.9% vs market
ARVEE · Oct 2025: +33.5% vs market
RESPONIND · Jun 2023: +35.2% vs market
GOLDTECH · Apr 2023: +38.6% vs market
ANANTRAJ · Nov 2021: +42.5% vs market
SNOWMAN · Mar 2023: +54.2% vs market
LOTUSEYE · Jun 2025: +63.8% vs market
INDOWIND · Jun 2021: +72.8% vs market
TATVA · Sep 2025: +75.3% vs market
PREMEXPLN · Sep 2023: +81.1% vs market
IRIS · May 2023: +106.0% vs market
URJA · Apr 2020: +142.3% vs market
ZENTEC · Jul 2022: +207.0% vs market
Similar setups −13.9%All companies −5.7%← worse than the marketbetter than the market →

Each dot is one past situation (hover or tap for details) · Solid dots are the closest matches, listed below · Shaded is the middle half of all companies in the same months · 3 beyond the range shown, drawn at the edge

Similar setups' median
−13.9%
All companies' median
−5.7%
Beat the market
32% vs 44%

50 past situations · 50 companies · 35 months · 2020–2025

The closest matches

CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
RAJTV
Consumer Services
Jun 2020 —3% −22%−30% +13%
BHANDARI
Consumer Non-Durables
Feb 2024 —9% +131%−14% −45%
VAKRANGEE
Retail Trade
Apr 2024 2660x3% +58%−13% −63%
MAANALU
Non-Energy Minerals
Jun 2024 1030x— +72%−16% −17%
SINTERCOM
Producer Manufacturing
Aug 2025 508x5% −8%−32% −40%
Show the other 3 matches
CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
ASHIANA
Finance
Aug 2021 933x0% +96%−12% −8%
INDOWIND
Utilities
Jun 2021 657x1% +94%−6% +73%
IGARASHI
Producer Manufacturing
Apr 2023 —— +3%−22% 0%
How reliable is this?

Matched on P/E, P/S, ROCE, debt/equity, interest cover, revenue growth, 12-month momentum, drawdown from 12-month high, size and volatility. Closest on: ROCE, drawdown from 12-month high and 12-month momentum. Not used (unavailable for this company): operating margin. One match per company and at most 7 from any one month.

Independent periods: the matches fall in 6 distinct 12-month windows. Matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, so fewer windows means less evidence.

How this is built

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to C P S SHAPERS LIMITED. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

Methodology

How historical analogs are built

Data as of 2026-11-09. Outcome pool: Jan 2020 to Oct 2025.

For every company we look at the situation it is in today (valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, 12-month price momentum, drawdown, size and volatility) and find past company-months that looked most like it. We then show what happened to those past situations over the following 12 months, measured against the ApnaFunda All index and against the base rate. It describes history. It does not predict anything.

What is compared

FeatureWeightNon-financialFinancial
P/E1yesyes
P/S1yes—
P/B1—yes
ROCE1yes—
operating margin1yes—
ROE1—yes
debt/equity0.75yes—
interest cover0.5yes—
revenue growth0.75yesyes
12-month momentum1yesyes
drawdown from 12-month high0.75yesyes
size0.75yesyes
volatility0.5yesyes

Weights were set by judgement before any outcome was looked at and are never tuned on results. Loss-making companies (negative P/E or net profit) are only matched with other loss-making companies. Banks, NBFCs and insurers are compared only with each other and use a different feature set. Every feature is converted, month by month, to its rank among companies in the same pool in that month, so a P/E of 30 in a hot market and a P/E of 22 in a cold one can match if both were equally expensive for their time. Only that month's data is used.

How closeness and the sample are defined

Distance is the weighted root-mean-square gap between the standardised features both companies have. A match needs at least 70% of the query's feature weight, a distance of at most 0.9, and 30 matches at minimum to be shown. We keep up to 50 matches with these exclusions: never the company itself, one match per company (its closest month), and at most 7 from any one calendar month so a single market episode cannot dominate.

Base rate

The base rate is the distribution of 12-month returns, relative to the market, of every eligible company-month in the same pool, with each month weighted to match the months the analogs came from. It answers: how did a random company do in these same months? Because matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, we also report the number of distinct 12-month windows behind a result, and a bootstrap that resamples months decides whether the analog median differs from the base rate at all. "Not meaningfully different" is the usual outcome and the page copy is written for it.

Limits you should know

  • One market period. The outcome pool covers 2020–2025 only (70 months), including the 2020 crash and the 2020–21 rally.
  • Survivorship. Only companies listed today are included. Delisted and bankrupt companies are missing, which flatters past outcomes, particularly for distressed-looking setups.
  • Price return only. Dividends are excluded, and the benchmark is an ApnaFunda market-cap-weighted index of the same listed companies, not an official index.
  • Reporting lag. Fundamentals are matched on an assumed 60-day lag after the quarter end, not on real announcement dates.
  • Pools: non-financial: 98,395 company-months from 2019 companies; financial: 5,659 company-months from 108 companies. 2349 companies currently have a result; the rest are suppressed because too few comparable situations exist.

Does it work? A walk-forward check

The walk-forward check has not been run for this build, so skill is shown as not yet measured.

Disclaimer

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to any company shown. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

What changed?

18 events since Jun '24

  1. JunValuationP/E crossed above the 90th percentile of its own history to date (1902.0x).
  2. AprPriceFell 29% from the Jan 2026 peak to the Apr 2026 low.
  3. MarPromoterPromoter holding fell 2.3 pts to 65.7% (largest drop since 2025-06).
  4. OctPriceRegained the 2025-06 peak, 2 months after the low.
  5. OctSharesShare count is up 5.2% over 12 months.
  6. SepValuationP/E crossed above the 90th percentile of its own history to date (944.2x).
  7. AugPriceFell 25% from the Jun 2025 peak to the Aug 2025 low.
  8. JunPromoterPromoter holding fell 3.6 pts to 67.7%.
Show 10 earlier events
  1. JunPeer rankSlipped to the bottom quartile of Consumer Non-Durables on ROCE (from the 2nd quartile).
  2. AprPriceRegained the 2025-01 peak, 1 month after the low.
  3. AprDebtDebt / equity halved over 12 months to 0.77x.
  4. MarPriceFell 35% from the Jan 2025 peak to the Mar 2025 low.
  5. NovPriceRegained the 2023-09 peak, 3 months after the low.
  6. SepDebtDebt / equity halved over 12 months to 0.77x.
  7. SepSharesShare count is up 200.0% over 12 months.
  8. AugPriceFell 50% from the Sep 2023 peak to the Aug 2024 low.
  9. JunPeer rankSlipped to the 2nd quartile of Consumer Non-Durables on ROCE (from the top quartile).
  10. JunDebtDebt / equity fell below 1.0x (0.77x).

Events are generated from the data by fixed rules.
The month shown is when the change became visible in the reported figures, assuming a 60-day lag after each quarter end; it is not an announcement date.

Where price and fundamentals disagree, market-wide Rewind the whole market to any month

Monthly history39 months · 2023-09 to 2026-11
MonthP/ERevenue (TTM)ROEROCEDebt / Equity
2026-111736.8x₹31 cr0.6%4.3%0.3x
2026-101754.4x₹31 cr0.6%4.3%0.3x
2026-091991.2x₹31 cr0.6%4.3%0.3x
2026-082017.5x₹31 cr0.6%4.3%0.3x
2026-071794.7x₹31 cr0.6%4.3%0.3x
2026-061902.0x₹31 cr0.6%4.3%0.3x
2026-051344.2x₹31 cr1.0%4.8%0.5x
2026-041272.7x₹31 cr1.0%4.8%0.5x
2026-031246.8x₹31 cr1.0%4.8%0.5x
2026-021461.0x₹31 cr1.0%4.8%0.5x
2026-011535.1x₹31 cr1.0%4.8%0.5x
2025-121545.5x₹31 cr1.0%4.8%0.5x
2025-111258.3x₹31 cr1.0%4.8%0.5x
2025-101364.7x₹31 cr1.0%4.8%0.5x
2025-09944.2x₹31 cr1.0%4.8%0.5x
2025-08935.1x₹31 cr1.0%4.8%0.5x
2025-07864.4x₹31 cr1.0%4.8%0.5x
2025-06974.0x₹31 cr1.0%4.8%0.5x
2025-05215.9x₹36 cr6.2%15.9%0.8x
2025-04189.5x₹36 cr6.2%15.9%0.8x
2025-03152.0x₹36 cr6.2%15.9%0.8x
2025-02123.1x₹36 cr6.2%15.9%0.8x
2025-01153.6x₹36 cr6.2%15.9%0.8x
2024-12179.6x₹36 cr6.2%15.9%0.8x
2024-11146.0x₹36 cr6.2%15.9%0.8x
2024-10126.1x₹36 cr6.2%15.9%0.8x
2024-09104.0x₹36 cr6.2%15.9%0.8x
2024-0884.2x₹36 cr6.2%15.9%0.8x
2024-0778.0x₹36 cr6.2%15.9%0.8x
2024-0673.9x₹36 cr6.2%15.9%0.8x
2024-0517.6x₹36 cr47.5%42.7%5.9x
2024-0423.2x₹36 cr47.5%42.7%5.9x
2024-0321.0x₹36 cr47.5%42.7%5.9x
2024-0221.6x₹36 cr47.5%42.7%5.9x
2024-0124.8x₹36 cr47.5%42.7%5.9x
2023-1224.7x₹36 cr47.5%42.7%5.9x
2023-1128.3x₹36 cr47.5%42.7%5.9x
2023-1028.8x₹36 cr47.5%42.7%5.9x
2023-0928.8x₹36 cr47.5%42.7%5.9x

Methodology and data notes

Methodology

Methodology and data notes

All figures come from public exchange prices and screener.in financial statements. Quarterly and annual results are shown from 60 days after the period end, so a month never uses a result before it would plausibly have been published. Statements are the latest versions, which may include later restatements.

Sector medians, percentiles and indices use today's listed companies in the sector (survivorship bias). Prices are adjusted for splits and bonus issues; around a corporate action the fundamentals may lag the price by up to a month, and affected sections are hidden.

The return decomposition uses price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count. The reverse DCF uses a fixed 12% cost of equity, a 10-year horizon and a 15x terminal P/E, and is an illustration only. Events, flags and twins follow fixed rules and thresholds described next to each section.

Feedback