अApnaFunda
Menu

CREDITACCESS GRAMEEN LIMITED (CREDITACC)

Finance · Finance/Rental/Leasing · figures to Nov '26

Earnings #6
Divergence: business ahead of price (3 months)
Quality scoreHow the business itself ranks against its sector peers on profitability, 3-year growth and leverage. 50 is the middle of the sector.46 / 100
Profitability 46Growth 45
Momentum scoreHow strong the recent trend is: 3-month price change, 12-month improvement in earnings and the rise in FII + DII holding, among companies above ₹500 cr.62 / 100
Price 4Earnings 99FII/DII 82

Passes these screensBusiness ahead of price

Compare withBAJAJ FINANCESHRIRAM FINANCECHOLAMANDALAM INVESTMENT AND F

Share price

Closing priceAdjusted for splits and bonus issues.

₹1,101.5 latest close · −29.3% over the last 90 sessions

₹1,000₹1,200₹1,400₹1,600Jul 3Jul 29Aug 24Sep 17Oct 14Nov 9 ₹1,000₹1,200₹1,400₹1,600Jul 3Sep 4Nov 9

₹1,101.5 month-end · −17.6% over 12 months

₹1,000₹1,200₹1,400₹1,600Nov '25Jan '26Apr '26Jun '26Sep '26Nov '26 ₹1,000₹1,200₹1,400₹1,600Nov '25May '26Nov '26

₹1,101.5 month-end · −35.1% over 3 years

₹1,000₹1,250₹1,500₹1,750Nov '23Jun '24Jan '25Sep '25Apr '26Nov '26 ₹1,000₹1,250₹1,500₹1,750Nov '23May '25Nov '26

₹1,101.5 month-end · +112.2% since Jun '19

₹500₹1,000₹1,500Jun '19Dec '20Jun '22Nov '23May '25Nov '26 ₹500₹1,000₹1,500Jun '19Mar '23Nov '26

52-week range ₹993.90 to ₹1634.00 · 1-year volatility 38.6%

Was the rally earned?

-18%share price, 1 yearLower P/E held it back

Earnings helped, the multiple did not.

  • Per-share earnings added 166 points, but investors now pay less per rupee of profit (P/E 110.0x to 14.6x), which took 184 points back.
  • The share count barely moved.
Net profit growth: +167 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+167 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: −184 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−184 ptsP/E changeShare count change: −1 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−1 ptsShare count changeShare price: −18%−18%Share priceNet profit growth: +167 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+167ProfitP/E change: −184 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−184P/EShare count change: −1 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−1SharesShare price: −18%−18%Share price
Net profit growth+167 ptsNet profit rose about 528%, which lifts the price.
P/E change-184 ptsThe P/E fell from 110.0x to 14.6x, which lowers the price.
Share count change-1 ptsShare count was little changed. More shares would count against the price.
-35%share price, 3 yearsLower P/E held it back

Earnings helped, the multiple did not.

  • Per-share earnings added 29 points, but investors now pay less per rupee of profit (P/E 32.1x to 14.6x), which took 64 points back.
  • The share count rose 3%.
Net profit growth: +31 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+31 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: −64 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−64 ptsP/E changeShare count change: −2 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−2 ptsShare count changeShare price: −35%−35%Share priceNet profit growth: +31 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+31ProfitP/E change: −64 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−64P/EShare count change: −2 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−2SharesShare price: −35%−35%Share price
Net profit growth+31 ptsNet profit rose about 47%, which lifts the price.
P/E change-64 ptsThe P/E fell from 32.1x to 14.6x, which lowers the price.
Share count change-2 ptsShare count rose 3%, which lowers the price.
+119%share price, 5 yearsLower P/E held it back

Mostly yes, with a catch.

  • Per-share earnings added 330 points, but investors now pay less per rupee of profit (P/E 58.5x to 14.6x), which took 211 points back.
  • The share count rose 6%.
Net profit growth: +338 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+338 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: −211 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−211 ptsP/E changeShare count change: −8 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−8 ptsShare count changeShare price: +119%+119%Share priceNet profit growth: +338 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+338ProfitP/E change: −211 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−211P/EShare count change: −8 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−8SharesShare price: +119%+119%Share price
Net profit growth+338 ptsNet profit rose about 827%, which lifts the price.
P/E change-211 ptsThe P/E fell from 58.5x to 14.6x, which lowers the price.
Share count change-8 ptsShare count rose 6%, which lowers the price.
What do "pts" mean?

"pts" are percentage points of the share price return. The parts add up to the total shown for each period. Because price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count, higher profit pushes the price up, a higher P/E pushes it up, and more shares push it down.

Example: if the price rose 34% and profit growth accounts for +58 pts while a lower P/E accounts for -24 pts, then 58 - 24 = 34. The +58 is not the profit growth rate itself: it is the part of the price move that profit growth explains.

Net profit is trailing twelve months as reported with a 60-day lag.

Compare this with BAJAJ FINANCE

How rough has the ride been?

Maximum drawdown-68.3%recovered 2022-04
1-year volatility38.6%annualised
Beta vs sector index0.763-year daily, correlation 0.33
Volume spikes3last 90 sessions, 5x the 50-day median

Drawdown from peak

0%−20%−40%−60%2020202120222023202420252026−67.6% 0%−20%−40%−60%2020202220242026−67.6%
Largest drawdowns

-68.3% (2020-02 peak to 2020-04 low, recovered 2022-04)

-53.8% (2023-12 peak to 2024-12 low, not yet recovered)

-21.4% (2022-06 peak to 2023-01 low, recovered 2023-05)

Most recent volume spikes

2026-10-23: 19.6x the 50-day median, price -5.6% that day

2026-10-22: 5.5x the 50-day median, price -4.7% that day

2026-07-27: 15.6x the 50-day median, price +4.8% that day

Beta is the slope of daily returns against a market-cap-weighted index of the sector's other listed companies, built from today's constituents (so it excludes companies no longer listed).

Is it expensive against its own past and its peers?

2.3xP/B todayNear its historic low
Against its own history8th percentile
CheapestMedian 3.2xDearest

Usual range 2.4x to 4.6x since 2019-06.

Against Finance2.3x vs 1.5x
This company
2.3x
Sector median
1.5x

48% above the Finance median.

0.6x2.1x3.7x5.2xJun '19Dec '20Jun '22Dec '23Jun '25Nov '260.6x2.1x3.7x5.2xJun '19Dec '21Jun '24Nov '26
P/B (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianFinance median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/E (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianFinance median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/S (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianFinance median
How to read this

Shaded band: 10th to 90th percentile of the company's own P/B history; dotted line: its median; orange line: sector median (companies with a positive multiple, at least 5 in the sector).

Sector figures are built from today's listed companies, so they exclude companies that are no longer listed.

All terms explained in the glossary →

How Finance is valued

Where does it rank among Finance peers?

Each cell is the company's percentile rank among its Finance peers (banks and financial companies) that month.
Darker is better-ranked.
Rows marked ↓ are inverted (lower debt, shorter cash cycle and a lower P/E rank higher).

Where it ranks today

  • ROE (approx.)46th▲ 17 pts vs a year ago
  • EPS growth98th▲ 87 pts vs a year ago
  • P/B ↓33rdflat vs a year ago
  • 12M momentum35th▼ 53 pts vs a year ago
  • FII + DII57thflat vs a year ago

Rank history

ROE (approx.)
EPS growth
P/B ↓
12M momentum
FII + DII
Dec '21Jul '22Jan '23Jul '23Jan '24Jul '24Jan '25Jul '25Jan '26Jul '26Nov '26
Lower rank Higher rank Not enough data

Percentiles use today's listed companies in the sector and need at least 5 peers with a value; grey cells have too few.
ROE is computed from net profit and book value where the source does not report it.

The Finance sector page Watch it move against Finance in the Observatory

What is the price implying?

~17%annual earnings growth implied by the priceBelow delivered growth

At normalised P/E (five-year average earnings) of 22.4x, a holder earning 12%/yr needs earnings to grow about 16.6%/yr for 10 years, then trade at 15x.

Delivered26.2%/yrEPS, last 8 fiscal years · 3-yr avg to 3-yr avg
Gap−9.6 ptsimplied minus delivered
Rank38thmost demanding of 63 financials

Over time

Implied growth by month (solid) and delivered growth (dashed).

0%23%45% Jun 2019Nov 2026 0%23%45% Jun 2019Nov 2026

Change the assumptions

Exit P/E / return11%12%13%
12x18.2%19.2%20.3%
15x15.6%16.6%17.6%
20x12.3%13.3%14.3%

Drag a slider to test other assumptions

Implied: 16.6%/yr

Looking back

  • Jan 2020Price implied 22%/yr; EPS has since grown 12%/yr (7.0 yrs)
  • Jan 2021Price implied 20%/yr; EPS has since grown 13%/yr (6.0 yrs)
  • Jan 2022Price implied 22%/yr; EPS has since grown 42%/yr (5.0 yrs)

Past comparisons cover only companies listed today (survivorship bias) and say nothing about future outcomes.

“Implied growth” is what the current price would require under our stated assumptions, not what we expect. How this is calculated and the market-wide lists.

What prices imply across Finance The market-wide Expectations lists

Key figures

Share Priceclose 9 Nov
₹1101.50
P/E
14.6x
Market Cap
₹17678 cr
Revenue (TTM)
₹6378 cr
P/S
2.8x
P/B
2.3x
ROE
11.0%
Debt / Equity
3.0x
Promoter Holding
66.2%
12M Momentum
-17.6%

52-week range

₹993.90₹1634.00
17% of the way from its 52-week low to its high

Price risk

1Y volatility
38.6%
Beta vs sector
1-year daily
0.74

Balance sheet & cash

Share count, 1Y
unchanged

Are profits backed by cash?

1 of 1checks within rangeAll clear
Tax rate25%Within range

Median quarterly effective tax rate over about 2.5 years: 25.0%. Bands: 15% to 35%, 5% to 15% or 35% to 50%, outside 5% to 50%.

Tap a check to see how it is measured

Cash conversion and receivable days are not meaningful for banks and NBFCs, so only the other-income and tax-rate checks are shown.

How to read this

Each check is a named rule with fixed thresholds, not a score. Annual statements are the latest restated figures, so a past year may differ from what was originally reported.

All terms explained in the glossary →

Who has been buying and selling?

  • Over 2 years, DIIs trimmed 3.1 pts; FIIs added 1.5 pts.
  • The number of shareholders rose from 57,989 to 79,071 (+36%) between Dec 2023 and Jun 2026.

Holdings, Jun '26

How each group changed

GroupDec '23Jun '26Change
Promoters66.7%66.2%-0.5 pts
FIIs12.0%13.5%+1.5 pts
DIIs15.8%12.7%-3.1 pts
Public and others5.6%7.6%+2.1 pts

Number of shareholders

79,071shareholders+36% since Dec '23
58k80k1.0L1.3L Dec '23Jun '24Dec '24Jun '25Dec '25Jun '26
Dec '23: 57,989
Mar '24: 69,824
Jun '24: 83,603
Sep '24: 1.0 lakh
Dec '24: 1.3 lakh
Mar '25: 1.2 lakh
Jun '25: 1.0 lakh
Sep '25: 83,943
Dec '25: 85,666
Mar '26: 83,884
Jun '26: 79,071
 58k80k1.0L1.3L Dec '23Dec '24Dec '25Jun '26
Dec '23: 57,989
Mar '24: 69,824
Jun '24: 83,603
Sep '24: 1.0 lakh
Dec '24: 1.3 lakh
Mar '25: 1.2 lakh
Jun '25: 1.0 lakh
Sep '25: 83,943
Dec '25: 85,666
Mar '26: 83,884
Jun '26: 79,071

Quarterly shareholding as reported, labelled by the quarter it covers (it becomes visible about two months later).
Shareholder counts are only available for recent quarters.

This quarter's smart-money board

What happened next to similar setups

−1.7%typical 12-month return vs the marketNot meaningfully different from the base rate
  • We found 50 past situations where a bank, NBFC or insurer looked like CREDITACCESS GRAMEEN LIMITED today on valuation, return on capital, growth, price momentum, size and volatility.
  • Over the following 12 months the middle half of them returned −30% to +22% vs the market, against −3% for all financial companies in the same months.
  • The gap against the base rate (+1.7%, 80% range −7.7% to +12.5%) is within what chance and overlapping periods produce.

Where the 50 outcomes landed

−60%−40%−20%0%+20%+40%+60%+80%
RBLBANK · Jun 2021: −60.4% vs market
UTKARSHBNK · Aug 2024: −53.9% vs market
SRGHFL · Sep 2025: −53.7% vs market
CANBK · Jan 2020: −47.8% vs market
FINOPB · Jul 2025: −43.7% vs market
EQUITASBNK · Mar 2024: −42.7% vs market
REPCOHOME · Jan 2020: −38.6% vs market
SPANDANA · Jun 2021: −37.9% vs market
CUB · Jan 2021: −37.6% vs market
IRFC · Sep 2025: −36.2% vs market
LTF · Dec 2020: −34.0% vs market
MUTHOOTCAP · Jun 2020: −33.9% vs market
UCOBANK · Oct 2025: −29.8% vs market
IDFCFIRSTB · Mar 2024: −29.7% vs market
DCBBANK · Apr 2020: −29.6% vs market
CENTRALBK · Feb 2025: −22.8% vs market
IOB · Sep 2025: −22.1% vs market
CSLFINANCE · Aug 2024: −20.4% vs market
HUDCO · May 2025: −17.5% vs market
BANKBARODA · Feb 2020: −16.8% vs market
MASFIN · Apr 2023: −13.4% vs market
IIFL · Jun 2024: −10.5% vs market
SUNDARMFIN · Oct 2025: −9.4% vs market
KARURVYSYA · Oct 2020: −5.4% vs market
PSB · Dec 2023: −5.1% vs market
JSFB · Sep 2025: +1.7% vs market
PNBHOUSING · Nov 2020: +3.1% vs market
NORTHARC · Sep 2025: +5.2% vs market
BANDHANBNK · Sep 2025: +9.3% vs market
AAVAS · Jul 2024: +9.3% vs market
APTUS · Jul 2024: +10.1% vs market
FEDERALBNK · May 2020: +11.6% vs market
AXISBANK · May 2020: +12.0% vs market
IDBI · Sep 2024: +13.6% vs market
LICHSGFIN · May 2020: +13.8% vs market
YESBANK · Jun 2025: +18.6% vs market
M&MFIN · Aug 2021: +20.9% vs market
CSBBANK · Mar 2022: +22.3% vs market
CANFINHOME · Feb 2025: +23.7% vs market
INDUSINDBK · Jan 2022: +25.0% vs market
SBFC · Oct 2024: +28.1% vs market
POONAWALLA · Nov 2024: +30.5% vs market
ARMANFIN · Aug 2025: +35.4% vs market
CHOLAHLDNG · Jun 2020: +37.2% vs market
SHRIRAMFIN · Oct 2022: +39.3% vs market
HOMEFIRST · May 2024: +48.3% vs market
UJJIVANSFB · Jul 2025: +53.8% vs market
MAHABANK · May 2022: +57.5% vs market
FEDFINA · May 2025: +61.1% vs market
PAISALO · Feb 2020: +157.3% vs market
Similar setups −1.7%All companies −3.4%← worse than the marketbetter than the market →

Each dot is one past situation (hover or tap for details) · Solid dots are the closest matches, listed below · Shaded is the middle half of all companies in the same months · 2 beyond the range shown, drawn at the edge

Similar setups' median
−1.7%
All companies' median
−3.4%
Beat the market
50% vs 46%

50 past situations · 50 companies · 32 months · 2020–2025

The closest matches

CompanyWhenP/EP/B12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
M&MFIN
Finance		 Aug 2021 26x1.3x +20%−28% +21%
CUB
Finance		 Jan 2021 26x2.4x −27%−29% −38%
PNBHOUSING
Finance		 Nov 2020 13x1.0x −29%−34% +3%
EQUITASBNK
Finance		 Mar 2024 18x2.0x +38%−19% −43%
FEDERALBNK
Finance		 May 2020 7x0.6x −58%−59% +12%
Show the other 3 matches
CompanyWhenP/EP/B12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
IOB
Finance		 Sep 2025 19x2.4x −32%−33% −22%
MAHABANK
Finance		 May 2022 20x0.9x −27%−39% +58%
RBLBANK
Finance		 Jun 2021 24x1.6x +21%−22% −60%
How reliable is this?

Matched on P/E, P/B, ROE, revenue growth, 12-month momentum, drawdown from 12-month high, size and volatility. Closest on: 12-month momentum, P/E and ROE. One match per company and at most 7 from any one month.

Independent periods: the matches fall in 6 distinct 12-month windows. Matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, so fewer windows means less evidence.

How this is built

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to CREDITACCESS GRAMEEN LIMITED. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

Methodology

How historical analogs are built

Data as of 2026-11-09. Outcome pool: Jan 2020 to Oct 2025.

For every company we look at the situation it is in today (valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, 12-month price momentum, drawdown, size and volatility) and find past company-months that looked most like it. We then show what happened to those past situations over the following 12 months, measured against the ApnaFunda All index and against the base rate. It describes history. It does not predict anything.

What is compared

FeatureWeightNon-financialFinancial
P/E1yesyes
P/S1yes—
P/B1—yes
ROCE1yes—
operating margin1yes—
ROE1—yes
debt/equity0.75yes—
interest cover0.5yes—
revenue growth0.75yesyes
12-month momentum1yesyes
drawdown from 12-month high0.75yesyes
size0.75yesyes
volatility0.5yesyes

Weights were set by judgement before any outcome was looked at and are never tuned on results. Loss-making companies (negative P/E or net profit) are only matched with other loss-making companies. Banks, NBFCs and insurers are compared only with each other and use a different feature set. Every feature is converted, month by month, to its rank among companies in the same pool in that month, so a P/E of 30 in a hot market and a P/E of 22 in a cold one can match if both were equally expensive for their time. Only that month's data is used.

How closeness and the sample are defined

Distance is the weighted root-mean-square gap between the standardised features both companies have. A match needs at least 70% of the query's feature weight, a distance of at most 0.9, and 30 matches at minimum to be shown. We keep up to 50 matches with these exclusions: never the company itself, one match per company (its closest month), and at most 7 from any one calendar month so a single market episode cannot dominate.

Base rate

The base rate is the distribution of 12-month returns, relative to the market, of every eligible company-month in the same pool, with each month weighted to match the months the analogs came from. It answers: how did a random company do in these same months? Because matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, we also report the number of distinct 12-month windows behind a result, and a bootstrap that resamples months decides whether the analog median differs from the base rate at all. "Not meaningfully different" is the usual outcome and the page copy is written for it.

Limits you should know

  • One market period. The outcome pool covers 2020–2025 only (70 months), including the 2020 crash and the 2020–21 rally.
  • Survivorship. Only companies listed today are included. Delisted and bankrupt companies are missing, which flatters past outcomes, particularly for distressed-looking setups.
  • Price return only. Dividends are excluded, and the benchmark is an ApnaFunda market-cap-weighted index of the same listed companies, not an official index.
  • Reporting lag. Fundamentals are matched on an assumed 60-day lag after the quarter end, not on real announcement dates.
  • Pools: non-financial: 98,395 company-months from 2019 companies; financial: 5,659 company-months from 108 companies. 2349 companies currently have a result; the rest are suppressed because too few comparable situations exist.

Does it work? A walk-forward check

The walk-forward check has not been run for this build, so skill is shown as not yet measured.

Disclaimer

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to any company shown. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

What else looks like this?

Companies with the most similar financial profile today, regardless of industry.

CITY UNION BANKCUB
Finance
73%similar
market capP/B
MAHINDRA & MAHINDRA FINANCIALM&MFIN
Finance
62%similar
EPS growthvolatility
POONAWALLA FINCORPPOONAWALLA
Finance
61%similar
volatilitypromoter holding

Similarity is statistical, based on reported metrics; it does not imply similar business quality or future returns.

What changed?

30 events since Jun '23

  1. OctValuationP/B fell below the 10th percentile of its own history to date (2.1x).
  2. OctPriceVolume reached 19.6x its 50-day median on 2026-10-23; price -5.6% that day.
  3. JulPriceVolume reached 15.6x its 50-day median on 2026-07-27; price +4.8% that day.
  4. JunResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned positive.
  5. JunPeer rankMoved into the top quartile of Finance on EPS growth (from the bottom quartile).
  6. MayPriceVolume reached 58.8x its 50-day median on 2026-05-05; price +15.4% that day.
  7. MarResultsRevenue (TTM) reached a new high of ₹5,868 cr.
  8. JanPriceVolume reached 94.1x its 50-day median on 2026-01-21; price +9.1% that day.
Show 22 earlier events
  1. OctPriceVolume reached 12.7x its 50-day median on 2025-10-24; price +6.6% that day.
  2. JulPriceVolume reached 21.3x its 50-day median on 2025-07-04; price +4.0% that day.
  3. JunResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned negative.
  4. JunPeer rankSlipped to the 3rd quartile of Finance on ROE (from the top quartile).
  5. JunDividendDividend payout cut from 11% to 0% of profit.
  6. MayPriceVolume reached 10.5x its 50-day median on 2025-05-27; price +2.6% that day.
  7. MarInstitutionsFII + DII holding fell 3.2 pts over 2 quarters to 23.9%.
  8. MarPeer rankSlipped to the 3rd quartile of Finance on EPS growth (from the top quartile).
  9. FebValuationP/B fell below the 10th percentile of its own history to date (2.2x).
  10. JanPriceVolume reached 72.5x its 50-day median on 2025-01-08; price +13.0% that day.
  11. DecPriceFell 54% from the Dec 2023 peak to the Dec 2024 low.
  12. NovPriceVolume reached 16.6x its 50-day median on 2024-11-29; price -8.5% that day.
  13. OctValuationP/B fell below the 10th percentile of its own history to date (2.4x).
  14. JunResultsRevenue (TTM) reached a new high of ₹5,167 cr.
  15. JunDividendStarted paying a dividend (payout 11% of profit).
  16. MayPriceVolume reached 7.6x its 50-day median on 2024-05-08; price +0.6% that day.
  17. OctValuationP/B crossed above the 90th percentile of its own history to date (4.9x).
  18. OctPriceVolume reached 28.4x its 50-day median on 2023-10-23; price +8.5% that day.
  19. JulPriceVolume reached 13.0x its 50-day median on 2023-07-24; price +4.5% that day.
  20. JunResultsRevenue (TTM) reached a new high of ₹3,487 cr.
  21. JunPeer rankMoved into the top quartile of Finance on ROE (from the 3rd quartile).
  22. JunPriceVolume reached 82.3x its 50-day median on 2023-06-30; price -5.9% that day.

Events are generated from the data by fixed rules.
The month shown is when the change became visible in the reported figures, assuming a 60-day lag after each quarter end; it is not an announcement date.

Where price and fundamentals disagree, market-wide Rewind the whole market to any month

Monthly history60 months · 2021-12 to 2026-11
MonthP/ERevenue (TTM)ROEDebt / Equity
2026-1114.6x₹6378 cr11.0%3.0x
2026-1013.5x₹6378 cr11.0%3.0x
2026-0916.8x₹6378 cr11.0%3.0x
2026-0828.1x₹6058 cr11.0%3.0x
2026-0732.8x₹6058 cr11.0%3.0x
2026-0630.7x₹6058 cr11.0%3.0x
2026-0542.7x₹5868 cr8.0%2.9x
2026-0442.8x₹5868 cr8.0%2.9x
2026-0338.2x₹5868 cr8.0%2.9x
2026-02151.3x₹5758 cr8.0%2.9x
2026-01158.7x₹5758 cr8.0%2.9x
2025-12152.3x₹5758 cr8.0%2.9x
2025-11110.0x₹5703 cr8.0%2.9x
2025-10117.1x₹5703 cr8.0%2.9x
2025-09111.3x₹5703 cr8.0%2.9x
2025-0842.0x₹5752 cr8.0%2.9x
2025-0737.4x₹5752 cr8.0%2.9x
2025-0636.3x₹5752 cr8.0%2.9x
2025-0520.7x₹5802 cr25.0%3.3x
2025-0419.7x₹5802 cr25.0%3.3x
2025-0317.2x₹5802 cr25.0%3.3x
2025-0211.0x₹5714 cr25.0%3.3x
2025-0112.9x₹5714 cr25.0%3.3x
2024-1210.6x₹5714 cr25.0%3.3x
2024-119.6x₹5508 cr25.0%3.3x
2024-1010.5x₹5508 cr25.0%3.3x
2024-0912.8x₹5508 cr25.0%3.3x
2024-0813.5x₹5167 cr25.0%3.3x
2024-0714.6x₹5167 cr25.0%3.3x
2024-0614.6x₹5167 cr25.0%3.3x
2024-0525.0x₹3487 cr18.0%3.2x
2024-0428.5x₹3487 cr18.0%3.2x
2024-0327.3x₹3487 cr18.0%3.2x
2024-0227.8x₹3487 cr18.0%3.2x
2024-0130.1x₹3487 cr18.0%3.2x
2023-1230.2x₹3487 cr18.0%3.2x
2023-1132.1x₹3487 cr18.0%3.2x
2023-1030.2x₹3487 cr18.0%3.2x
2023-0924.9x₹3487 cr18.0%3.2x
2023-0826.8x₹3487 cr18.0%3.2x
2023-0727.5x₹3487 cr18.0%3.2x
2023-0623.6x₹3487 cr18.0%3.2x
2023-0554.5x₹2669 cr9.0%3.1x
2023-0442.6x₹2669 cr9.0%3.1x
2023-0340.4x₹2669 cr9.0%3.1x
2023-0242.6x₹2669 cr9.0%3.1x
2023-0138.0x₹2669 cr9.0%3.1x
2022-1240.4x₹2669 cr9.0%3.1x
2022-1142.4x₹2669 cr9.0%3.1x
2022-1043.1x₹2669 cr9.0%3.1x
2022-0943.9x₹2669 cr9.0%3.1x
2022-0844.0x₹2669 cr9.0%3.1x
2022-0746.6x₹2669 cr9.0%3.1x
2022-0644.8x₹2669 cr9.0%3.1x
2022-05124.4x₹2461 cr4.0%3.0x
2022-04120.3x₹2461 cr4.0%3.0x
2022-0398.7x₹2461 cr4.0%3.0x
2022-0287.1x₹2461 cr4.0%3.0x
2022-0172.9x₹2461 cr4.0%3.0x
2021-1269.4x₹2461 cr4.0%3.0x

Older months are in the live observatory.

Methodology and data notes

Methodology

Methodology and data notes

All figures come from public exchange prices and screener.in financial statements. Quarterly and annual results are shown from 60 days after the period end, so a month never uses a result before it would plausibly have been published. Statements are the latest versions, which may include later restatements.

Sector medians, percentiles and indices use today's listed companies in the sector (survivorship bias). Prices are adjusted for splits and bonus issues; around a corporate action the fundamentals may lag the price by up to a month, and affected sections are hidden.

The return decomposition uses price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count. The reverse DCF uses a fixed 12% cost of equity, a 10-year horizon and a 15x terminal P/E, and is an illustration only. Events, flags and twins follow fixed rules and thresholds described next to each section.

Feedback