अApnaFunda
Menu

GATEWAY DISTRIPARKS LIMITED (GATEWAY)

Non-Energy Minerals · Precious Metals · figures to Nov '26

Quality scoreHow the business itself ranks against its sector peers on profitability, 3-year growth and leverage. 50 is the middle of the sector.64 / 100
Profitability 71Growth 58Balance sheet 63
Momentum scoreHow strong the recent trend is: 3-month price change, 12-month improvement in earnings and the rise in FII + DII holding, among companies above ₹500 cr.20 / 100
Price 22Earnings 33FII/DII 4

Passes these screensCash RichValue Pick

Share price

Closing priceAdjusted for splits and bonus issues.

₹47.7 latest close · −21.2% over the last 90 sessions

₹50₹60Jul 3Jul 29Aug 24Sep 17Oct 14Nov 9 ₹50₹60Jul 3Sep 4Nov 9

₹47.7 month-end · −14.5% over 12 months

₹45₹50₹55Nov '25Jan '26Apr '26Jun '26Sep '26Nov '26 ₹45₹50₹55Nov '25May '26Nov '26

₹47.7 month-end · −51.2% over 3 years

₹40₹60₹80₹100Nov '23Jun '24Jan '25Sep '25Apr '26Nov '26 ₹40₹60₹80₹100Nov '23May '25Nov '26

₹47.7 month-end · −24.6% since Mar '22

₹40₹60₹80₹100Mar '22Feb '23Jan '24Jan '25Dec '25Nov '26 ₹40₹60₹80₹100Mar '22Jul '24Nov '26

52-week range ₹42.44 to ₹62.38 · 1-year volatility 31.5%

Was the rally earned?

-15%share price, 1 yearEarnings-driven

Mostly earnings.

  • Per-share earnings took off 42 points, while the multiple moved less (P/E 7.3x to 9.8x).
  • The share count barely moved.
Net profit growth: −43 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).−43 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: +27 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+27 ptsP/E changeShare count change: +1 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.+1 ptsShare count changeShare price: −14%−14%Share priceNet profit growth: −43 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).−43ProfitP/E change: +27 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+27P/EShare count change: +1 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.+1SharesShare price: −14%−14%Share price
Net profit growth-43 ptsNet profit fell about 37%, which lowers the price.
P/E change+27 ptsThe P/E rose from 7.3x to 9.8x, which lifts the price.
Share count change+1 ptsShare count was little changed. More shares would count against the price.
-51%share price, 3 yearsLower P/E held it back

Earnings helped, the multiple did not.

  • Per-share earnings added 1 point, but investors now pay less per rupee of profit (P/E 20.4x to 9.8x), which took 53 points back.
  • The share count barely moved.
Net profit growth: +1 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+1 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: −53 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−53 ptsP/E changeShare count change: +1 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.+1 ptsShare count changeShare price: −51%−51%Share priceNet profit growth: +1 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+1ProfitP/E change: −53 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−53P/EShare count change: +1 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.+1SharesShare price: −51%−51%Share price
Net profit growth+1 ptsNet profit was little changed.
P/E change-53 ptsThe P/E fell from 20.4x to 9.8x, which lowers the price.
Share count change+1 ptsShare count was little changed. More shares would count against the price.
What do "pts" mean?

"pts" are percentage points of the share price return. The parts add up to the total shown for each period. Because price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count, higher profit pushes the price up, a higher P/E pushes it up, and more shares push it down.

Example: if the price rose 34% and profit growth accounts for +58 pts while a lower P/E accounts for -24 pts, then 58 - 24 = 34. The +58 is not the profit growth rate itself: it is the part of the price move that profit growth explains.

Not shown for 5 years: earnings were negative at one end, or there is not enough history.

Net profit is trailing twelve months as reported with a 60-day lag.

Compare with other companies

How rough has the ride been?

Maximum drawdown-62.3%not yet recovered
1-year volatility31.5%annualised
Beta vs sector index0.733-year daily, correlation 0.47
Volume spikes3last 90 sessions, 5x the 50-day median

Drawdown from peak

0%−20%−40%−60%2023202420252026−62.3% 0%−20%−40%−60%2023202420252026−62.3%
Largest drawdowns

-62.3% (2024-01 peak to 2026-10 low, not yet recovered)

-28.3% (2022-04 peak to 2023-02 low, recovered 2023-08)

Most recent volume spikes

2026-10-28: 10.1x the 50-day median, price 0.0% that day

2026-08-06: 6.6x the 50-day median, price +1.6% that day

2026-08-05: 7.5x the 50-day median, price -6.3% that day

Beta is the slope of daily returns against a market-cap-weighted index of the sector's other listed companies, built from today's constituents (so it excludes companies no longer listed).

Is it expensive against its own past and its peers?

9.8xP/E todayWithin its usual range
Against its own history25th percentile
CheapestMedian 14.3xDearest

Usual range 7.3x to 20.7x since 2022-03.

Against Non-Energy Minerals9.8x vs 21.8x
This company
9.8x
Sector median
21.8x

55% below the Non-Energy Minerals median.

4.6x377.3x749.9x1122.6xMar '22Mar '23Mar '24Mar '25Mar '26Nov '264.6x377.3x749.9x1122.6xMar '22Oct '23May '25Nov '26
P/E (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianNon-Energy Minerals median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/B (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianNon-Energy Minerals median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/S (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianNon-Energy Minerals median
How to read this

Shaded band: 10th to 90th percentile of the company's own P/E history; dotted line: its median; orange line: sector median (companies with a positive multiple, at least 5 in the sector).

Sector figures are built from today's listed companies, so they exclude companies that are no longer listed.

All terms explained in the glossary →

How Non-Energy Minerals is valued

Where does it rank among Non-Energy Minerals peers?

Each cell is the company's percentile rank among its Non-Energy Minerals peers (non-financial companies) that month.
Darker is better-ranked.
Rows marked ↓ are inverted (lower debt, shorter cash cycle and a lower P/E rank higher).

Where it ranks today

  • ROCE55th▲ 6 pts vs a year ago
  • Op. margin87thflat vs a year ago
  • Revenue growth68th▼ 18 pts vs a year ago
  • EPS growth17th▼ 74 pts vs a year ago
  • Debt/equity ↓54thflat vs a year ago
  • Cash cycle ↓99th▲ 36 pts vs a year ago
  • P/E ↓86th▼ 11 pts vs a year ago
  • 12M momentum48th▲ 25 pts vs a year ago

Rank history

ROCE
Op. margin
Revenue growth
EPS growth
Debt/equity ↓
Cash cycle ↓
P/E ↓
12M momentum
Dec '21Jul '22Jan '23Jul '23Jan '24Jul '24Jan '25Jul '25Jan '26Jul '26Nov '26
Lower rank Higher rank Not enough data

Percentiles use today's listed companies in the sector and need at least 5 peers with a value; grey cells have too few.
ROE is computed from net profit and book value where the source does not report it.

The Non-Energy Minerals sector page Watch it move against Non-Energy Minerals in the Observatory

What is the price implying?

~3%annual earnings growth implied by the priceIn line with delivered growth

At normalised P/E (five-year average earnings) of 8.9x, a holder earning 12%/yr needs earnings to grow about 2.9%/yr for 10 years, then trade at 15x.

Delivered3.6%/yrEPS, last 9 fiscal years · 3-yr avg to 3-yr avg
Gap−0.7 ptsimplied minus delivered
Rank545thmost demanding of 856

Over time

Implied growth by month (solid) and delivered growth (dashed).

0%11%21% Mar 2022Nov 2026 0%11%21% Mar 2022Nov 2026

Change the assumptions

Exit P/E / return11%12%13%
12x3.8%4.8%5.7%
15x1.9%2.9%3.8%
20x−0.5%0.4%1.3%

Drag a slider to test other assumptions

Implied: 2.9%/yr

“Implied growth” is what the current price would require under our stated assumptions, not what we expect. How this is calculated and the market-wide lists.

What prices imply across Non-Energy Minerals The market-wide Expectations lists

Key figures

Share Priceclose 9 Nov
₹47.70
P/E
9.8x
ROCE
11.0%
Market Cap
₹2382 cr
Revenue (TTM)
₹2210 cr
P/S
1.1x
P/B
1.0x
ROE
10.6%
Operating Margin
21.0%
Debt / Equity
0.3x
Promoter Holding
33.9%
12M Momentum
-14.5%

52-week range

₹42.44₹62.38
26% of the way from its 52-week low to its high

Price risk

1Y volatility
31.5%
Beta vs sector
1-year daily
0.69

Balance sheet & cash

Interest cover
operating profit ÷ interest
5.8x
Cash from profit, 3Y
operating cash flow ÷ net profit
1.32x
Share count, 1Y
unchanged

Are profits backed by cash?

5 of 6checks within range1 near a threshold
Other income reliance6%Within range

Other income as a share of pre-tax profit (trailing twelve months): 6.0%. Bands: below 15%, 15% to 35%, above 35%.

Tax rate7%Near threshold

Median quarterly effective tax rate over about 2.5 years: 7.0%. Bands: 15% to 35%, 5% to 15% or 35% to 50%, outside 5% to 50%.

Cash conversion1.32xWithin range

Operating cash flow divided by net profit over the last three fiscal years: 1.32x (cash from operations ₹1,175 cr, net profit ₹891 cr). Bands: 0.8x and above, 0.5x to 0.8x, below 0.5x.

Free cash flow5 of 5 yrsWithin range

Fiscal years with positive free cash flow in the last 5: 5. Bands: at least 80% of years, 40% to 80%, below 40%.

Receivable days vs history+7 daysWithin range

Debtor days are above the median of the previous three fiscal years by 7 days (44 vs 37). Bands: under 15 days, 15 to 45, over 45.

Capital work in progress1% of fixed assetsWithin range

Capital work-in-progress is 1% of fixed assets. Bands: not rising or up to 30%; rising for three years and above 30%; rising and above 60%.

Payable days—Not enough data

Not enough reported data to compute this.

Tap a check to see how it is measured

How to read this

Each check is a named rule with fixed thresholds, not a score. Annual statements are the latest restated figures, so a past year may differ from what was originally reported.

All terms explained in the glossary →

Who has been buying and selling?

  • Over 3 years, DIIs trimmed 9.4 pts; FIIs trimmed 5.9 pts; promoters added 1.6 pts.
  • The number of shareholders rose from 69,794 to 1.3 lakh (+82%) between Sep 2023 and Jun 2026.

Holdings, Jun '26

How each group changed

GroupSep '23Jun '26Change
Promoters32.3%33.9%+1.6 pts
FIIs12.8%7.0%-5.9 pts
DIIs41.8%32.4%-9.4 pts
Public and others13.0%26.7%+13.6 pts

Number of shareholders

1.3 lakhshareholders+82% since Sep '23
70k90k1.1L1.3L Sep '23Jun '24Mar '25Dec '25Jun '26
Sep '23: 69,794
Dec '23: 81,046
Mar '24: 89,419
Jun '24: 93,227
Sep '24: 1.1 lakh
Dec '24: 1.2 lakh
Mar '25: 1.2 lakh
Jun '25: 1.3 lakh
Sep '25: 1.3 lakh
Dec '25: 1.3 lakh
Mar '26: 1.3 lakh
Jun '26: 1.3 lakh
 70k90k1.1L1.3L Sep '23Sep '24Sep '25Jun '26
Sep '23: 69,794
Dec '23: 81,046
Mar '24: 89,419
Jun '24: 93,227
Sep '24: 1.1 lakh
Dec '24: 1.2 lakh
Mar '25: 1.2 lakh
Jun '25: 1.3 lakh
Sep '25: 1.3 lakh
Dec '25: 1.3 lakh
Mar '26: 1.3 lakh
Jun '26: 1.3 lakh

Quarterly shareholding as reported, labelled by the quarter it covers (it becomes visible about two months later).
Shareholder counts are only available for recent quarters.

This quarter's smart-money board

What happened next to similar setups

+20.0%typical 12-month return vs the marketAbove the base rate
  • We found 50 past situations where a non-financial company looked like GATEWAY DISTRIPARKS LIMITED today on valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, price momentum, size and volatility.
  • Over the following 12 months the middle half of them returned −18% to +53% vs the market, against −1% for all non-financial companies in the same months.
  • The analogs' median sat above that base rate (gap +21.2%, 80% range +13.9% to +31.4%), but the matches cluster in only 6 distinct 12-month windows.

Where the 50 outcomes landed

−100%−50%0%+50%+100%
DHAMPURSUG · Jul 2023: −45.6% vs market
VRLLOG · Jan 2024: −41.4% vs market
NILKAMAL · Oct 2023: −41.3% vs market
GHCL · Mar 2023: −40.8% vs market
RADIANTCMS · May 2025: −36.2% vs market
CAPACITE · May 2025: −32.6% vs market
MASTEK · May 2025: −31.6% vs market
MALLCOM · Sep 2025: −25.5% vs market
GIPCL · Nov 2020: −24.0% vs market
BANARISUG · Jul 2023: −22.7% vs market
KSL · Mar 2025: −22.3% vs market
WELENT · May 2021: −20.5% vs market
SHK · Dec 2022: −19.6% vs market
DALMIASUG · Aug 2023: −14.8% vs market
NAVNETEDUL · Jun 2024: −11.0% vs market
KCP · Feb 2020: −9.6% vs market
JAGRAN · May 2023: −8.1% vs market
BBL · Aug 2020: +1.6% vs market
GRANULES · Apr 2024: +6.0% vs market
INSECTICID · Feb 2022: +10.4% vs market
BALMLAWRIE · Nov 2023: +13.2% vs market
EPL · Sep 2025: +14.5% vs market
JKLAKSHMI · Jul 2024: +16.3% vs market
ALLCARGO · Mar 2020: +17.5% vs market
AVTNPL · Aug 2025: +17.8% vs market
FIEMIND · Mar 2020: +22.2% vs market
SHYAMMETL · Jul 2023: +27.0% vs market
ANDHRSUGAR · Aug 2021: +29.8% vs market
SPAL · Jul 2023: +30.5% vs market
NRBBEARING · May 2025: +34.2% vs market
BALRAMCHIN · Jun 2024: +35.3% vs market
JKIL · Aug 2021: +39.1% vs market
PCBL · Jul 2023: +39.7% vs market
AWHCL · Jan 2023: +40.4% vs market
GENUSPOWER · Aug 2020: +49.5% vs market
VTL · Apr 2021: +50.4% vs market
UFLEX · Mar 2020: +51.9% vs market
KIRLOSIND · Feb 2020: +52.6% vs market
POLYPLEX · Mar 2020: +60.0% vs market
SCI · Oct 2022: +63.4% vs market
FSL · Jan 2020: +66.5% vs market
SUNFLAG · Jan 2022: +74.1% vs market
TIMETECHNO · Aug 2023: +83.1% vs market
GRWRHITECH · May 2023: +86.4% vs market
TRIDENT · Jan 2020: +95.0% vs market
TCI · Apr 2021: +114.8% vs market
DBCORP · Jul 2022: +125.1% vs market
TIIL · May 2021: +137.3% vs market
SHRIPISTON · Aug 2022: +149.8% vs market
IRCON · Feb 2023: +196.7% vs market
Similar setups +20.0%All companies −1.2%← worse than the marketbetter than the market →

Each dot is one past situation (hover or tap for details) · Solid dots are the closest matches, listed below · Shaded is the middle half of all companies in the same months · 5 beyond the range shown, drawn at the edge

Similar setups' median
+20.0%
All companies' median
−1.2%
Beat the market
66% vs 49%

50 past situations · 50 companies · 30 months · 2020–2025

The closest matches

CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
JAGRAN
Consumer Services		 May 2023 7x11% +16%−14% −8%
BBL
Producer Manufacturing		 Aug 2020 10x9% −9%−18% +2%
KSL
Non-Energy Minerals		 Mar 2025 13x— −11%−39% −22%
KIRLOSIND
Non-Energy Minerals		 Feb 2020 7x10% −22%−29% +53%
VTL
Process Industries		 Apr 2021 12x10% +81%−10% +50%
Show the other 3 matches
CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
ALLCARGO
Transportation		 Mar 2020 5x13% −49%−51% +18%
BALMLAWRIE
Producer Manufacturing		 Nov 2023 14x10% +25%−9% +13%
JKIL
Industrial Services		 Aug 2021 14x13% +81%−11% +39%
How reliable is this?

Matched on P/E, P/S, ROCE, operating margin, debt/equity, interest cover, revenue growth, 12-month momentum, drawdown from 12-month high, size and volatility. Closest on: drawdown from 12-month high, 12-month momentum and P/S. One match per company and at most 7 from any one month.

Independent periods: the matches fall in 6 distinct 12-month windows. Matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, so fewer windows means less evidence.

How this is built

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to GATEWAY DISTRIPARKS LIMITED. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

Methodology

How historical analogs are built

Data as of 2026-11-09. Outcome pool: Jan 2020 to Oct 2025.

For every company we look at the situation it is in today (valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, 12-month price momentum, drawdown, size and volatility) and find past company-months that looked most like it. We then show what happened to those past situations over the following 12 months, measured against the ApnaFunda All index and against the base rate. It describes history. It does not predict anything.

What is compared

FeatureWeightNon-financialFinancial
P/E1yesyes
P/S1yes—
P/B1—yes
ROCE1yes—
operating margin1yes—
ROE1—yes
debt/equity0.75yes—
interest cover0.5yes—
revenue growth0.75yesyes
12-month momentum1yesyes
drawdown from 12-month high0.75yesyes
size0.75yesyes
volatility0.5yesyes

Weights were set by judgement before any outcome was looked at and are never tuned on results. Loss-making companies (negative P/E or net profit) are only matched with other loss-making companies. Banks, NBFCs and insurers are compared only with each other and use a different feature set. Every feature is converted, month by month, to its rank among companies in the same pool in that month, so a P/E of 30 in a hot market and a P/E of 22 in a cold one can match if both were equally expensive for their time. Only that month's data is used.

How closeness and the sample are defined

Distance is the weighted root-mean-square gap between the standardised features both companies have. A match needs at least 70% of the query's feature weight, a distance of at most 0.9, and 30 matches at minimum to be shown. We keep up to 50 matches with these exclusions: never the company itself, one match per company (its closest month), and at most 7 from any one calendar month so a single market episode cannot dominate.

Base rate

The base rate is the distribution of 12-month returns, relative to the market, of every eligible company-month in the same pool, with each month weighted to match the months the analogs came from. It answers: how did a random company do in these same months? Because matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, we also report the number of distinct 12-month windows behind a result, and a bootstrap that resamples months decides whether the analog median differs from the base rate at all. "Not meaningfully different" is the usual outcome and the page copy is written for it.

Limits you should know

  • One market period. The outcome pool covers 2020–2025 only (70 months), including the 2020 crash and the 2020–21 rally.
  • Survivorship. Only companies listed today are included. Delisted and bankrupt companies are missing, which flatters past outcomes, particularly for distressed-looking setups.
  • Price return only. Dividends are excluded, and the benchmark is an ApnaFunda market-cap-weighted index of the same listed companies, not an official index.
  • Reporting lag. Fundamentals are matched on an assumed 60-day lag after the quarter end, not on real announcement dates.
  • Pools: non-financial: 98,395 company-months from 2019 companies; financial: 5,659 company-months from 108 companies. 2349 companies currently have a result; the rest are suppressed because too few comparable situations exist.

Does it work? A walk-forward check

The walk-forward check has not been run for this build, so skill is shown as not yet measured.

Disclaimer

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to any company shown. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

What else looks like this?

Companies with the most similar financial profile today, regardless of industry.

KRSNAA DIAGNOSTICSKRSNAA
Health Services
63%similar
promoter holdingvolatility
HAPPIEST MINDS TECHNOLOGIESHAPPSTMNDS
Technology Services
57%similar
revenueoperating margin
J KUMAR INFRAPROJECTSJKIL
Industrial Services
57%similar
volatilityP/E
PATEL ENGINEERINGPATELENG
Industrial Services
56%similar
debt/equitymarket cap
NITIN SPINNERSNITINSPIN
Process Industries
55%similar
ROCEoperating margin
JK LAKSHMI CEMENTJKLAKSHMI
Non-Energy Minerals
48%similar
ROCEEPS growth
KALYANI STEELSKSL
Non-Energy Minerals
44%similar
operating marginEPS growth
GREENPANEL INDUSTRIESGREENPANEL
Non-Energy Minerals
43%similar
P/Edebt/equity

Similarity is statistical, based on reported metrics; it does not imply similar business quality or future returns.

What changed?

30 events since Aug '23

  1. OctPriceFell 62% from the Jan 2024 peak to the Oct 2026 low.
  2. OctPriceVolume reached 10.1x its 50-day median on 2026-10-28; price -0.0% that day.
  3. AugPriceVolume reached 7.5x its 50-day median on 2026-08-05; price -6.3% that day.
  4. JunPeer rankMoved into the 2nd quartile of Non-Energy Minerals on ROCE (from the 3rd quartile).
  5. MayPriceVolume reached 8.8x its 50-day median on 2026-05-07; price -0.2% that day.
  6. MarResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned negative.
  7. MarValuationP/E crossed above the 90th percentile of its own history to date (989.2x).
  8. MarPeer rankSlipped to the bottom quartile of Non-Energy Minerals on EPS growth (from the top quartile).
Show 22 earlier events
  1. MarPriceVolume reached 5.3x its 50-day median on 2026-03-25; price +7.4% that day.
  2. DecInstitutionsFII + DII holding fell 4.1 pts over 2 quarters to 43.7%.
  3. DecPriceVolume reached 5.1x its 50-day median on 2025-12-04; price +6.2% that day.
  4. JulPriceVolume reached 28.1x its 50-day median on 2025-07-30; price +4.4% that day.
  5. JunResultsRevenue (TTM) reached a new high of ₹1,681 cr.
  6. MayPriceVolume reached 10.6x its 50-day median on 2025-05-30; price -3.1% that day.
  7. MarResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned positive.
  8. MarInstitutionsFII + DII holding fell 6.1 pts over 2 quarters to 49.4%.
  9. MarPeer rankMoved into the top quartile of Non-Energy Minerals on EPS growth (from the 3rd quartile).
  10. FebValuationP/E fell below the 10th percentile of its own history to date (12.5x).
  11. DecResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned negative.
  12. DecPriceVolume reached 15.5x its 50-day median on 2024-12-10; price +6.8% that day.
  13. SepPeer rankSlipped to the 3rd quartile of Non-Energy Minerals on ROCE (from the 2nd quartile).
  14. JulPriceVolume reached 14.4x its 50-day median on 2024-07-11; price +6.2% that day.
  15. JunResultsRevenue (TTM) reached a new high of ₹1,536 cr.
  16. JunPeer rankSlipped to the 3rd quartile of Non-Energy Minerals on EPS growth (from the 2nd quartile).
  17. AprValuationP/E crossed above the 90th percentile of its own history to date (21.1x).
  18. AprPriceVolume reached 5.4x its 50-day median on 2024-04-05; price +1.4% that day.
  19. JanPriceVolume reached 8.1x its 50-day median on 2024-01-10; price +8.7% that day.
  20. NovPriceVolume reached 13.1x its 50-day median on 2023-11-30; price -3.2% that day.
  21. AugPriceRegained the 2022-04 peak, 6 months after the low.
  22. AugPriceVolume reached 7.1x its 50-day median on 2023-08-10; price +5.0% that day.

Events are generated from the data by fixed rules.
The month shown is when the change became visible in the reported figures, assuming a 60-day lag after each quarter end; it is not an announcement date.

Where price and fundamentals disagree, market-wide Rewind the whole market to any month

Monthly history57 months · 2022-03 to 2026-11
MonthP/ERevenue (TTM)ROEROCEDebt / Equity
2026-119.8x₹2210 cr10.6%11.0%0.3x
2026-108.8x₹2210 cr10.8%11.0%0.3x
2026-0910.6x₹2210 cr10.8%11.0%0.3x
2026-0810.5x₹2211 cr11.3%11.0%0.3x
2026-0711.1x₹2211 cr11.3%11.0%0.3x
2026-0611.1x₹2211 cr11.3%11.0%0.3x
2026-051095.8x₹2212 cr0.1%11.0%0.3x
2026-041122.6x₹2212 cr0.1%11.0%0.3x
2026-03989.2x₹2212 cr0.1%11.0%0.3x
2026-027.4x₹2055 cr17.8%11.0%0.3x
2026-017.1x₹2055 cr17.8%11.0%0.3x
2025-127.3x₹2055 cr17.8%11.0%0.3x
2025-117.3x₹1878 cr17.6%11.0%0.3x
2025-107.9x₹1878 cr17.6%11.0%0.3x
2025-097.6x₹1878 cr17.6%11.0%0.3x
2025-088.2x₹1681 cr17.0%11.0%0.3x
2025-079.0x₹1681 cr17.0%11.0%0.3x
2025-068.4x₹1681 cr17.0%11.0%0.3x
2025-054.9x₹1521 cr32.1%13.0%0.3x
2025-044.6x₹1521 cr32.1%13.0%0.3x
2025-034.6x₹1521 cr32.1%13.0%0.3x
2025-0212.5x₹1511 cr11.9%13.0%0.3x
2025-0115.9x₹1511 cr11.9%13.0%0.3x
2024-1216.7x₹1511 cr11.9%13.0%0.3x
2024-1116.3x₹1520 cr12.6%13.0%0.3x
2024-1017.4x₹1520 cr12.6%13.0%0.3x
2024-0918.0x₹1520 cr12.6%13.0%0.3x
2024-0818.5x₹1536 cr13.3%13.0%0.3x
2024-0720.3x₹1536 cr13.3%13.0%0.3x
2024-0618.9x₹1536 cr13.3%13.0%0.3x
2024-0519.4x₹1421 cr13.6%13.0%0.3x
2024-0421.1x₹1421 cr13.6%13.0%0.3x
2024-0319.8x₹1421 cr13.6%13.0%0.3x
2024-0221.3x₹1421 cr13.6%13.0%0.3x
2024-0122.2x₹1421 cr13.6%13.0%0.3x
2023-1220.5x₹1421 cr13.6%13.0%0.3x
2023-1120.4x₹1421 cr13.6%13.0%0.3x
2023-1017.3x₹1421 cr13.6%13.0%0.3x
2023-0917.2x₹1421 cr13.6%13.0%0.3x
2023-0817.0x₹1421 cr13.6%13.0%0.3x
2023-0715.4x₹1421 cr13.6%13.0%0.3x
2023-0614.3x₹1421 cr13.6%13.0%0.3x
2023-0514.1x₹1374 cr13.7%12.0%0.4x
2023-0413.5x₹1374 cr13.7%12.0%0.4x
2023-0313.2x₹1374 cr13.7%12.0%0.4x
2023-0212.5x₹1374 cr13.7%12.0%0.4x
2023-0113.6x₹1374 cr13.7%12.0%0.4x
2022-1214.3x₹1374 cr13.7%12.0%0.4x
2022-1114.2x₹1374 cr13.7%12.0%0.4x
2022-1015.4x₹1374 cr13.7%12.0%0.4x
2022-0914.4x₹1374 cr13.7%12.0%0.4x
2022-0814.4x₹1374 cr13.7%12.0%0.4x
2022-0715.6x₹1374 cr13.7%12.0%0.4x
2022-0614.2x₹1374 cr13.7%12.0%0.4x
2022-0515.3x₹1179 cr6.4%9.0%0.5x
2022-0415.1x₹1179 cr6.4%9.0%0.5x
2022-0313.5x₹1179 cr6.4%9.0%0.5x

Methodology and data notes

Methodology

Methodology and data notes

All figures come from public exchange prices and screener.in financial statements. Quarterly and annual results are shown from 60 days after the period end, so a month never uses a result before it would plausibly have been published. Statements are the latest versions, which may include later restatements.

Sector medians, percentiles and indices use today's listed companies in the sector (survivorship bias). Prices are adjusted for splits and bonus issues; around a corporate action the fundamentals may lag the price by up to a month, and affected sections are hidden.

The return decomposition uses price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count. The reverse DCF uses a fixed 12% cost of equity, a 10-year horizon and a 15x terminal P/E, and is an illustration only. Events, flags and twins follow fixed rules and thresholds described next to each section.

Feedback