अApnaFunda
Menu

GEEKAY WIRE LIMITED (GEEKAYWIRE)

Producer Manufacturing · Metal Fabrications · figures to Nov '26

Quality scoreHow the business itself ranks against its sector peers on profitability, 3-year growth and leverage. 50 is the middle of the sector.29 / 100
Profitability 38Growth 31Balance sheet 20

Passes these screensValue PickPromoters buying

Compare withBANSAL WIRE INDUSTRIES

Share price

Closing priceAdjusted for splits and bonus issues.

₹26.99 latest close · +6.5% over the last 90 sessions

₹25₹30Jul 3Jul 29Aug 24Sep 17Oct 14Nov 9 ₹25₹30Jul 3Sep 4Nov 9

₹26.99 month-end · −17.7% over 12 months

₹20₹25₹30₹35Nov '25Jan '26Apr '26Jun '26Sep '26Nov '26 ₹20₹25₹30₹35Nov '25May '26Nov '26

₹26.99 month-end · −28.2% over 3 years

₹20₹40₹60Nov '23Jun '24Jan '25Sep '25Apr '26Nov '26 ₹20₹40₹60Nov '23May '25Nov '26

₹26.99 month-end · +693.8% since Feb '19

₹0₹20₹40₹60Feb '19Nov '20May '22Nov '23May '25Nov '26 ₹0₹20₹40₹60Feb '19Feb '23Nov '26

52-week range ₹18.51 to ₹35.60 · 1-year volatility 51.6%

Was the rally earned?

-18%share price, 1 yearEarnings-driven

Mostly earnings.

  • Per-share earnings took off 14 points, while the multiple moved less (P/E 10.2x to 9.8x).
  • The share count barely moved.
Net profit growth: −13 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).−13 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: −4 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−4 ptsP/E changeShare count change: 0 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.0 ptsShare count changeShare price: −18%−18%Share priceNet profit growth: −13 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).−13ProfitP/E change: −4 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−4P/EShare count change: 0 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.0SharesShare price: −18%−18%Share price
Net profit growth-13 ptsNet profit fell about 14%, which lowers the price.
P/E change-4 ptsThe P/E fell from 10.2x to 9.8x, which lowers the price.
Share count change0 ptsShare count was little changed. More shares would count against the price.
-28%share price, 3 yearsLower P/E held it back

Earnings helped, the multiple did not.

  • Per-share earnings added 14 points, but investors now pay less per rupee of profit (P/E 16.1x to 9.8x), which took 42 points back.
  • The share count rose 2%.
Net profit growth: +15 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+15 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: −42 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−42 ptsP/E changeShare count change: −2 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−2 ptsShare count changeShare price: −28%−28%Share priceNet profit growth: +15 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+15ProfitP/E change: −42 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−42P/EShare count change: −2 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−2SharesShare price: −28%−28%Share price
Net profit growth+15 ptsNet profit rose about 20%, which lifts the price.
P/E change-42 ptsThe P/E fell from 16.1x to 9.8x, which lowers the price.
Share count change-2 ptsShare count rose 2%, which lowers the price.
+184%share price, 5 yearsLower P/E held it back

Mostly yes, with a catch.

  • Per-share earnings added 268 points, but investors now pay less per rupee of profit (P/E 15.8x to 9.8x), which took 84 points back.
  • The share count rose 5%.
Net profit growth: +276 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+276 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: −84 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−84 ptsP/E changeShare count change: −8 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−8 ptsShare count changeShare price: +184%+184%Share priceNet profit growth: +276 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+276ProfitP/E change: −84 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−84P/EShare count change: −8 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−8SharesShare price: +184%+184%Share price
Net profit growth+276 ptsNet profit rose about 380%, which lifts the price.
P/E change-84 ptsThe P/E fell from 15.8x to 9.8x, which lowers the price.
Share count change-8 ptsShare count rose 5%, which lowers the price.
What do "pts" mean?

"pts" are percentage points of the share price return. The parts add up to the total shown for each period. Because price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count, higher profit pushes the price up, a higher P/E pushes it up, and more shares push it down.

Example: if the price rose 34% and profit growth accounts for +58 pts while a lower P/E accounts for -24 pts, then 58 - 24 = 34. The +58 is not the profit growth rate itself: it is the part of the price move that profit growth explains.

Net profit is trailing twelve months as reported with a 60-day lag.

Compare this with BANSAL WIRE INDUSTRIES

How rough has the ride been?

Maximum drawdown-72.4%not yet recovered
1-year volatility51.6%annualised

Drawdown from peak

0%−20%−40%−60%2020202120222023202420252026−71.7% 0%−20%−40%−60%2020202220242026−71.7%
Largest drawdowns

-72.4% (2024-09 peak to 2026-03 low, not yet recovered)

-47.9% (2021-07 peak to 2022-10 low, recovered 2023-02)

-36.0% (2024-02 peak to 2024-03 low, recovered 2024-08)

Is it expensive against its own past and its peers?

9.8xP/E todayWithin its usual range
Against its own history22nd percentile
CheapestMedian 12.3xDearest

Usual range 8.8x to 19.1x since 2019-02.

Against Producer Manufacturing9.8x vs 29.6x
This company
9.8x
Sector median
29.6x

67% below the Producer Manufacturing median.

6.5x19.0x31.5x44.0xFeb '19Sep '20Apr '22Nov '23Jun '25Nov '266.5x19.0x31.5x44.0xFeb '19Sep '21Apr '24Nov '26
P/E (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianProducer Manufacturing median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/B (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianProducer Manufacturing median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/S (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianProducer Manufacturing median
How to read this

Shaded band: 10th to 90th percentile of the company's own P/E history; dotted line: its median; orange line: sector median (companies with a positive multiple, at least 5 in the sector).

Sector figures are built from today's listed companies, so they exclude companies that are no longer listed.

All terms explained in the glossary →

How Producer Manufacturing is valued

Where does it rank among Producer Manufacturing peers?

Each cell is the company's percentile rank among its Producer Manufacturing peers (non-financial companies) that month.
Darker is better-ranked.
Rows marked ↓ are inverted (lower debt, shorter cash cycle and a lower P/E rank higher).

Where it ranks today

  • ROCE58th▼ 22 pts vs a year ago
  • Op. margin18thflat vs a year ago
  • Revenue growth14th▼ 40 pts vs a year ago
  • EPS growth24th▼ 5 pts vs a year ago
  • Debt/equity ↓15th▼ 4 pts vs a year ago
  • Cash cycle ↓46th▼ 12 pts vs a year ago
  • P/E ↓93rd▼ 3 pts vs a year ago
  • 12M momentum33rd▲ 9 pts vs a year ago

Rank history

ROCE
Op. margin
Revenue growth
EPS growth
Debt/equity ↓
Cash cycle ↓
P/E ↓
12M momentum
Dec '21Jul '22Jan '23Jul '23Jan '24Jul '24Jan '25Jul '25Jan '26Jul '26Nov '26
Lower rank Higher rank Not enough data

Percentiles use today's listed companies in the sector and need at least 5 peers with a value; grey cells have too few.
ROE is computed from net profit and book value where the source does not report it.

The Producer Manufacturing sector page Watch it move against Producer Manufacturing in the Observatory

What is the price implying?

~6%annual earnings growth implied by the price

At a P/E of 10.2x, the price would imply about 6.1%/yr earnings growth for 10 years under the same assumptions, but it is not ranked.

Below the ₹1,000 cr market-cap floor used for the lists.

“Implied growth” is what the current price would require under our stated assumptions, not what we expect.

What prices imply across Producer Manufacturing The market-wide Expectations lists

Key figures

Share Priceclose 9 Nov
₹26.99
P/E
9.8x
ROCE
17.0%
Market Cap
₹282 cr
Revenue (TTM)
₹444 cr
P/S
0.6x
P/B
1.7x
ROE
16.8%
Operating Margin
5.9%
Debt / Equity
0.8x
Promoter Holding
60.5%
12M Momentum
-17.7%

52-week range

₹18.51₹35.60
50% of the way from its 52-week low to its high

Price risk

1Y volatility
51.6%
Beta vs sector
1-year daily
0.87

Balance sheet & cash

Interest cover
operating profit ÷ interest
6.7x
Cash from profit, 3Y
operating cash flow ÷ net profit
1.09x
Share count, 1Y
unchanged

Are profits backed by cash?

4 of 7checks within range1 beyond a threshold
Other income reliance41%Beyond threshold

Other income as a share of pre-tax profit (trailing twelve months): 41.4%. Bands: below 15%, 15% to 35%, above 35%.

Tax rate25%Within range

Median quarterly effective tax rate over about 2.5 years: 25.5%. Bands: 15% to 35%, 5% to 15% or 35% to 50%, outside 5% to 50%.

Cash conversion1.09xWithin range

Operating cash flow divided by net profit over the last three fiscal years: 1.09x (cash from operations ₹114 cr, net profit ₹105 cr). Bands: 0.8x and above, 0.5x to 0.8x, below 0.5x.

Free cash flow2 of 5 yrsNear threshold

Fiscal years with positive free cash flow in the last 5: 2. Bands: at least 80% of years, 40% to 80%, below 40%.

Receivable days vs history-5 daysWithin range

Debtor days are below the median of the previous three fiscal years by 5 days (57 vs 62). Bands: under 15 days, 15 to 45, over 45.

Capital work in progress36% of fixed assetsNear threshold

Capital work-in-progress is 36% of fixed assets. Bands: not rising or up to 30%; rising for three years and above 30%; rising and above 60%.

Payable days+1 days / 2 yrsWithin range

Days payable changed by +1 over two years. Bands: rise of up to 30 days; more than 30 days.

Tap a check to see how it is measured

How to read this

Each check is a named rule with fixed thresholds, not a score. Annual statements are the latest restated figures, so a past year may differ from what was originally reported.

All terms explained in the glossary →

Who has been buying and selling?

  • Over 2 years, promoters added 1.2 pts.
  • The number of shareholders rose from 16,624 to 31,643 (+90%) between Dec 2023 and Jun 2026.

Holdings, Jun '26

How each group changed

GroupDec '23Jun '26Change
Promoters59.3%60.5%+1.2 pts
FIIs0.0%0.0%0.0 pts
DIIs0.0%0.0%0.0 pts
Public and others40.7%39.5%-1.3 pts

Number of shareholders

31,643shareholders+90% since Dec '23
17k23k29k36k Dec '23Dec '24Jun '25Dec '25Jun '26
Dec '23: 16,624
Sep '24: 35,835
Dec '24: 35,312
Mar '25: 35,310
Jun '25: 34,327
Sep '25: 33,660
Dec '25: 33,599
Mar '26: 32,104
Jun '26: 31,643
 17k23k29k36k Dec '23Mar '25Dec '25Jun '26
Dec '23: 16,624
Sep '24: 35,835
Dec '24: 35,312
Mar '25: 35,310
Jun '25: 34,327
Sep '25: 33,660
Dec '25: 33,599
Mar '26: 32,104
Jun '26: 31,643

Quarterly shareholding as reported, labelled by the quarter it covers (it becomes visible about two months later).
Shareholder counts are only available for recent quarters.

This quarter's smart-money board

What happened next to similar setups

+9.3%typical 12-month return vs the marketNot meaningfully different from the base rate
  • We found 50 past situations where a non-financial company looked like GEEKAY WIRE LIMITED today on valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, price momentum, size and volatility.
  • Over the following 12 months the middle half of them returned −11% to +68% vs the market, against −1% for all non-financial companies in the same months.
  • The gap against the base rate (+10.1%, 80% range −3.7% to +27.3%) is within what chance and overlapping periods produce.

Where the 50 outcomes landed

−100%−50%0%+50%+100%
DCMSRIND · Dec 2024: −69.6% vs market
RUSHIL · Aug 2025: −44.2% vs market
BESTAGRO · Jul 2025: −43.9% vs market
ESTER · Nov 2022: −43.3% vs market
IVP · Oct 2024: −33.2% vs market
MVGJL · Feb 2025: −31.8% vs market
UNIVCABLES · Jun 2021: −28.1% vs market
KHAICHEM · Jan 2024: −26.7% vs market
KMSUGAR · Jul 2022: −20.6% vs market
DHAMPURSUG · Feb 2020: −20.3% vs market
AVADHSUGAR · Jun 2022: −14.8% vs market
TBZ · Nov 2021: −11.7% vs market
AGARIND · Jul 2024: −11.2% vs market
HARRMALAYA · Nov 2022: −8.9% vs market
BCLIND · Jul 2023: −8.6% vs market
SANGAMIND · Jun 2023: −7.2% vs market
JAYAGROGN · Jun 2021: −5.5% vs market
NITINSPIN · Mar 2024: −5.2% vs market
SPORTKING · Sep 2023: −3.7% vs market
UCAL · May 2020: −3.6% vs market
MANINDS · Mar 2021: −2.7% vs market
INSPIRISYS · Oct 2025: −2.2% vs market
INDOAMIN · Jul 2024: −2.1% vs market
PARACABLES · Aug 2020: −0.8% vs market
PDMJEPAPER · May 2022: +5.4% vs market
MAGADSUGAR · Mar 2023: +13.2% vs market
KCPSUGIND · Dec 2021: +18.8% vs market
ARIES · Feb 2020: +20.6% vs market
SUNFLAG · Jan 2020: +23.5% vs market
DALMIASUG · Feb 2020: +28.3% vs market
SKMEGGPROD · Oct 2021: +34.1% vs market
NRAIL · Oct 2021: +36.5% vs market
20MICRONS · Dec 2021: +38.4% vs market
HITECHCORP · Mar 2020: +41.9% vs market
ORIENTPPR · Sep 2022: +46.6% vs market
CMNL · Aug 2024: +52.3% vs market
GPTINFRA · Aug 2022: +59.5% vs market
MADHUSUDAN · Sep 2025: +70.2% vs market
SPIC · Sep 2020: +70.9% vs market
CLSEL · Oct 2022: +75.6% vs market
GRMOVER · Jul 2024: +89.1% vs market
ICIL · Apr 2023: +96.3% vs market
TPLPLASTEH · Sep 2020: +100.8% vs market
LAMBODHARA · May 2022: +105.7% vs market
TRIVENI · May 2020: +111.1% vs market
SALASAR · Aug 2020: +121.6% vs market
HITECH · Nov 2020: +147.3% vs market
DPABHUSHAN · Mar 2021: +157.6% vs market
REFEX · Jun 2024: +187.7% vs market
VISHNU · Sep 2020: +198.5% vs market
Similar setups +9.3%All companies −0.8%← worse than the marketbetter than the market →

Each dot is one past situation (hover or tap for details) · Solid dots are the closest matches, listed below · Shaded is the middle half of all companies in the same months · 8 beyond the range shown, drawn at the edge

Similar setups' median
+9.3%
All companies' median
−0.8%
Beat the market
52% vs 49%

50 past situations · 50 companies · 36 months · 2020–2025

The closest matches

CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
SPIC
Process Industries		 Sep 2020 6x13% −4%−21% +71%
GRMOVER
Process Industries		 Jul 2024 21x14% +22%−6% +89%
KMSUGAR
Process Industries		 Jul 2022 7x15% −5%−30% −21%
SKMEGGPROD
Process Industries		 Oct 2021 13x14% +91%−18% +34%
BCLIND
Consumer Non-Durables		 Jul 2023 17x13% +20%−11% −9%
Show the other 3 matches
CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
SPORTKING
Process Industries		 Sep 2023 8x18% +12%−13% −4%
BESTAGRO
Process Industries		 Jul 2025 16x13% −20%−30% −44%
DHAMPURSUG
Process Industries		 Feb 2020 4x15% −33%−34% −20%
How reliable is this?

Matched on P/E, P/S, ROCE, operating margin, debt/equity, interest cover, revenue growth, 12-month momentum, drawdown from 12-month high, size and volatility. Closest on: 12-month momentum, P/S and P/E. One match per company and at most 7 from any one month.

Independent periods: the matches fall in 6 distinct 12-month windows. Matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, so fewer windows means less evidence.

How this is built

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to GEEKAY WIRE LIMITED. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

Methodology

How historical analogs are built

Data as of 2026-11-09. Outcome pool: Jan 2020 to Oct 2025.

For every company we look at the situation it is in today (valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, 12-month price momentum, drawdown, size and volatility) and find past company-months that looked most like it. We then show what happened to those past situations over the following 12 months, measured against the ApnaFunda All index and against the base rate. It describes history. It does not predict anything.

What is compared

FeatureWeightNon-financialFinancial
P/E1yesyes
P/S1yes—
P/B1—yes
ROCE1yes—
operating margin1yes—
ROE1—yes
debt/equity0.75yes—
interest cover0.5yes—
revenue growth0.75yesyes
12-month momentum1yesyes
drawdown from 12-month high0.75yesyes
size0.75yesyes
volatility0.5yesyes

Weights were set by judgement before any outcome was looked at and are never tuned on results. Loss-making companies (negative P/E or net profit) are only matched with other loss-making companies. Banks, NBFCs and insurers are compared only with each other and use a different feature set. Every feature is converted, month by month, to its rank among companies in the same pool in that month, so a P/E of 30 in a hot market and a P/E of 22 in a cold one can match if both were equally expensive for their time. Only that month's data is used.

How closeness and the sample are defined

Distance is the weighted root-mean-square gap between the standardised features both companies have. A match needs at least 70% of the query's feature weight, a distance of at most 0.9, and 30 matches at minimum to be shown. We keep up to 50 matches with these exclusions: never the company itself, one match per company (its closest month), and at most 7 from any one calendar month so a single market episode cannot dominate.

Base rate

The base rate is the distribution of 12-month returns, relative to the market, of every eligible company-month in the same pool, with each month weighted to match the months the analogs came from. It answers: how did a random company do in these same months? Because matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, we also report the number of distinct 12-month windows behind a result, and a bootstrap that resamples months decides whether the analog median differs from the base rate at all. "Not meaningfully different" is the usual outcome and the page copy is written for it.

Limits you should know

  • One market period. The outcome pool covers 2020–2025 only (70 months), including the 2020 crash and the 2020–21 rally.
  • Survivorship. Only companies listed today are included. Delisted and bankrupt companies are missing, which flatters past outcomes, particularly for distressed-looking setups.
  • Price return only. Dividends are excluded, and the benchmark is an ApnaFunda market-cap-weighted index of the same listed companies, not an official index.
  • Reporting lag. Fundamentals are matched on an assumed 60-day lag after the quarter end, not on real announcement dates.
  • Pools: non-financial: 98,395 company-months from 2019 companies; financial: 5,659 company-months from 108 companies. 2349 companies currently have a result; the rest are suppressed because too few comparable situations exist.

Does it work? A walk-forward check

The walk-forward check has not been run for this build, so skill is shown as not yet measured.

Disclaimer

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to any company shown. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

What changed?

30 events since Jun '22

  1. SepPeer rankSlipped to the bottom quartile of Producer Manufacturing on operating margin (from the 3rd quartile).
  2. JulValuationP/E fell below the 10th percentile of its own history to date (7.8x).
  3. JunPeer rankSlipped to the 2nd quartile of Producer Manufacturing on ROCE (from the top quartile).
  4. MarPriceFell 72% from the Sep 2024 peak to the Mar 2026 low.
  5. MarPeer rankSlipped to the bottom quartile of Producer Manufacturing on EPS growth (from the 3rd quartile).
  6. JanValuationP/E fell below the 10th percentile of its own history to date (9.0x).
  7. DecPeer rankMoved into the 3rd quartile of Producer Manufacturing on operating margin (from the bottom quartile).
  8. JunResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned negative.
Show 22 earlier events
  1. JunPeer rankSlipped to the 3rd quartile of Producer Manufacturing on EPS growth (from the 2nd quartile).
  2. AprValuationP/E fell below the 10th percentile of its own history to date (9.7x).
  3. DecResultsRevenue (TTM) reached a new high of ₹426 cr.
  4. DecPeer rankSlipped to the bottom quartile of Producer Manufacturing on operating margin (from the 3rd quartile).
  5. SepPeer rankMoved into the 3rd quartile of Producer Manufacturing on operating margin (from the bottom quartile).
  6. AugPriceRegained the 2024-02 peak, 5 months after the low.
  7. JunResultsRevenue (TTM) reached a new high of ₹412 cr.
  8. JunDebtDebt / equity fell below 1.0x (0.67x).
  9. JunDividendDividend payout cut from 12% to 2% of profit.
  10. AprValuationP/E crossed above the 90th percentile of its own history to date (23.6x).
  11. MarPriceFell 36% from the Feb 2024 peak to the Mar 2024 low.
  12. DecValuationP/E crossed above the 90th percentile of its own history to date (19.4x).
  13. SepPriceRegained the 2023-07 peak, 1 month after the low.
  14. AugPriceFell 29% from the Jul 2023 peak to the Aug 2023 low.
  15. JunResultsRevenue (TTM) reached a new high of ₹399 cr.
  16. JunPeer rankMoved into the top quartile of Producer Manufacturing on ROCE (from the 2nd quartile).
  17. JunDividendDividend payout cut from 29% to 12% of profit.
  18. FebPriceRegained the 2021-07 peak, 4 months after the low.
  19. DecValuationP/E fell below the 10th percentile of its own history to date (8.7x).
  20. OctPriceFell 48% from the Jul 2021 peak to the Oct 2022 low.
  21. JunResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned positive.
  22. JunValuationP/E fell below the 10th percentile of its own history to date (8.8x).

Events are generated from the data by fixed rules.
The month shown is when the change became visible in the reported figures, assuming a 60-day lag after each quarter end; it is not an announcement date.

Where price and fundamentals disagree, market-wide Rewind the whole market to any month

Monthly history94 months · 2019-02 to 2026-11
MonthP/ERevenue (TTM)ROEROCEDebt / Equity
2026-119.8x₹444 cr16.8%17.0%0.8x
2026-109.4x₹444 cr16.8%17.0%0.8x
2026-0911.3x₹444 cr16.8%17.0%0.8x
2026-089.2x₹441 cr17.6%17.0%0.8x
2026-077.8x₹441 cr17.6%17.0%0.8x
2026-068.9x₹441 cr17.6%17.0%0.8x
2026-057.8x₹455 cr21.3%25.0%0.8x
2026-048.6x₹455 cr21.3%25.0%0.8x
2026-036.4x₹455 cr21.3%25.0%0.8x
2026-028.0x₹453 cr22.6%25.0%0.8x
2026-019.0x₹453 cr22.6%25.0%0.8x
2025-1211.0x₹453 cr22.6%25.0%0.8x
2025-1110.2x₹453 cr23.2%25.0%0.8x
2025-1010.3x₹453 cr23.2%25.0%0.8x
2025-0910.5x₹453 cr23.2%25.0%0.8x
2025-089.8x₹458 cr25.2%25.0%0.8x
2025-079.7x₹458 cr25.2%25.0%0.8x
2025-0610.2x₹458 cr25.2%25.0%0.8x
2025-059.7x₹433 cr35.5%35.0%0.7x
2025-049.7x₹433 cr35.5%35.0%0.7x
2025-0310.1x₹433 cr35.5%35.0%0.7x
2025-0210.0x₹426 cr36.3%35.0%0.7x
2025-0111.7x₹426 cr36.3%35.0%0.7x
2024-1213.1x₹426 cr36.3%35.0%0.7x
2024-1112.7x₹411 cr36.9%35.0%0.7x
2024-1013.8x₹411 cr36.9%35.0%0.7x
2024-0914.3x₹411 cr36.9%35.0%0.7x
2024-0816.6x₹412 cr35.3%35.0%0.7x
2024-0713.2x₹412 cr35.3%35.0%0.7x
2024-0612.4x₹412 cr35.3%35.0%0.7x
2024-0519.1x₹399 cr32.9%27.0%1.3x
2024-0423.6x₹399 cr32.9%27.0%1.3x
2024-0319.9x₹399 cr32.9%27.0%1.3x
2024-0222.8x₹399 cr32.9%27.0%1.3x
2024-0124.4x₹399 cr32.9%27.0%1.3x
2023-1219.4x₹399 cr32.9%27.0%1.3x
2023-1116.1x₹399 cr32.9%27.0%1.3x
2023-1016.1x₹399 cr32.9%27.0%1.3x
2023-0912.9x₹399 cr32.9%27.0%1.3x
2023-0812.7x₹399 cr32.9%27.0%1.3x
2023-0712.3x₹399 cr32.9%27.0%1.3x
2023-0610.0x₹399 cr32.9%27.0%1.3x
2023-0523.6x₹258 cr17.3%14.0%2.1x
2023-0419.1x₹258 cr17.3%14.0%2.1x
2023-0318.7x₹258 cr17.3%14.0%2.1x
2023-0213.8x₹258 cr17.3%14.0%2.1x
2023-019.9x₹258 cr17.3%14.0%2.1x
2022-128.7x₹258 cr17.3%14.0%2.1x
2022-119.0x₹258 cr17.3%14.0%2.1x
2022-106.9x₹258 cr17.3%14.0%2.1x
2022-097.8x₹258 cr17.3%14.0%2.1x
2022-088.5x₹258 cr17.3%14.0%2.1x
2022-078.8x₹258 cr17.3%14.0%2.1x
2022-068.8x₹258 cr17.3%14.0%2.1x
2022-0513.5x₹170 cr13.3%13.0%1.9x
2022-0411.6x₹170 cr13.3%13.0%1.9x
2022-0311.1x₹170 cr13.3%13.0%1.9x
2022-0211.0x₹170 cr13.3%13.0%1.9x
2022-0113.3x₹170 cr13.3%13.0%1.9x
2021-1212.9x₹170 cr13.3%13.0%1.9x
2021-1115.8x₹170 cr13.3%13.0%1.9x
2021-1015.0x₹170 cr13.3%13.0%1.9x
2021-0913.9x₹170 cr13.3%13.0%1.9x
2021-0813.9x₹170 cr13.3%13.0%1.9x
2021-0717.0x₹170 cr13.3%13.0%1.9x
2021-0614.9x₹170 cr13.3%13.0%1.9x
2021-0514.6x₹190 cr15.0%16.0%1.4x
2021-0412.1x₹190 cr15.0%16.0%1.4x
2021-0312.5x₹190 cr15.0%16.0%1.4x
2021-0212.8x₹190 cr15.0%16.0%1.4x
2021-0112.0x₹190 cr15.0%16.0%1.4x
2020-1210.6x₹190 cr15.0%16.0%1.4x
2020-1110.4x₹190 cr15.0%16.0%1.4x
2020-1010.5x₹190 cr15.0%16.0%1.4x
2020-0913.4x₹190 cr15.0%16.0%1.4x
2020-0814.4x₹190 cr15.0%16.0%1.4x
2020-0714.3x₹190 cr15.0%16.0%1.4x
2020-0611.1x₹190 cr15.0%16.0%1.4x
2020-0523.3x₹218 cr8.6%13.0%2.1x
2020-0418.1x₹218 cr8.6%13.0%2.1x
2020-0318.4x₹218 cr8.6%13.0%2.1x
2020-0214.6x₹218 cr8.6%13.0%2.1x
2020-0114.3x₹218 cr8.6%13.0%2.1x
2019-1211.9x₹218 cr8.6%13.0%2.1x
2019-1112.2x₹218 cr8.6%13.0%2.1x
2019-10—————
2019-0912.6x₹218 cr8.6%13.0%2.1x
2019-0812.2x₹218 cr8.6%13.0%2.1x
2019-0712.6x₹218 cr8.6%13.0%2.1x
2019-0611.9x₹218 cr8.6%13.0%2.1x
2019-0534.0x₹124 cr3.6%9.0%3.1x
2019-04—————
2019-03—————
2019-0234.0x₹124 cr3.6%9.0%3.1x

Methodology and data notes

Methodology

Methodology and data notes

All figures come from public exchange prices and screener.in financial statements. Quarterly and annual results are shown from 60 days after the period end, so a month never uses a result before it would plausibly have been published. Statements are the latest versions, which may include later restatements.

Sector medians, percentiles and indices use today's listed companies in the sector (survivorship bias). Prices are adjusted for splits and bonus issues; around a corporate action the fundamentals may lag the price by up to a month, and affected sections are hidden.

The return decomposition uses price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count. The reverse DCF uses a fixed 12% cost of equity, a 10-year horizon and a 15x terminal P/E, and is an illustration only. Events, flags and twins follow fixed rules and thresholds described next to each section.

Feedback