अApnaFunda

SPORTKING INDIA LIMITED (SPORTKING)

Process Industries · Textiles · figures to Nov '26

Quality scoreHow the business itself ranks against its sector peers on profitability, 3-year growth and leverage. 50 is the middle of the sector.59 / 100
Profitability 70Growth 61Balance sheet 46
Momentum scoreHow strong the recent trend is: 3-month price change, 12-month improvement in earnings and the rise in FII + DII holding, among companies above ₹500 cr.64 / 100
Price 50Earnings 77FII/DII 65

Passes these screensCash RichHigh MomentumLittle growth priced in

Share price

Closing priceAdjusted for splits and bonus issues.

₹197.54 latest close · +10.1% over the last 90 sessions

₹180₹200₹220Jul 3Jul 29Aug 24Sep 17Oct 14Nov 9 ₹180₹200₹220Jul 3Sep 4Nov 9

₹197.54 month-end · +109.4% over 12 months

₹100₹150₹200Nov '25Jan '26Apr '26Jun '26Sep '26Nov '26 ₹100₹150₹200Nov '25May '26Nov '26

₹197.54 month-end · +139.9% over 3 years

₹100₹150₹200Nov '23Jun '24Jan '25Sep '25Apr '26Nov '26 ₹100₹150₹200Nov '23May '25Nov '26

₹197.54 month-end · +113.1% since Aug '22

₹50₹100₹150₹200Aug '22Jun '23Apr '24Mar '25Jan '26Nov '26 ₹50₹100₹150₹200Aug '22Oct '24Nov '26

52-week range ₹78.17 to ₹241.51 · 1-year volatility 50.1%

Was the rally earned?

+109%share price, 1 yearEarnings and multiple

Both mattered.

  • Per-share earnings added 47 points and the multiple added 63 points (P/E 10.2x to 15.5x).
  • The share count barely moved.
Net profit growth: +48 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+48 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: +63 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+63 ptsP/E changeShare count change: −1 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−1 ptsShare count changeShare price: +109%+109%Share priceNet profit growth: +48 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+48ProfitP/E change: +63 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+63P/EShare count change: −1 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−1SharesShare price: +109%+109%Share price
Net profit growth+48 ptsNet profit rose about 38%, which lifts the price.
P/E change+63 ptsThe P/E rose from 10.2x to 15.5x, which lifts the price.
Share count change-1 ptsShare count was little changed. More shares would count against the price.
+140%share price, 3 yearsMultiple-driven

Partly.

  • Most of the rise came from investors paying a higher multiple (P/E 8.3x to 15.5x); per-share earnings added 40 points.
  • The share count fell 5%.
Net profit growth: +32 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+32 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: +100 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+100 ptsP/E changeShare count change: +8 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.+8 ptsShare count changeShare price: +140%+140%Share priceNet profit growth: +32 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+32ProfitP/E change: +100 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+100P/EShare count change: +8 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.+8SharesShare price: +140%+140%Share price
Net profit growth+32 ptsNet profit rose about 22%, which lifts the price.
P/E change+100 ptsThe P/E rose from 8.3x to 15.5x, which lifts the price.
Share count change+8 ptsShare count fell 5%, which lifts the price.
What do "pts" mean?

"pts" are percentage points of the share price return. The parts add up to the total shown for each period. Because price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count, higher profit pushes the price up, a higher P/E pushes it up, and more shares push it down.

Example: if the price rose 34% and profit growth accounts for +58 pts while a lower P/E accounts for -24 pts, then 58 - 24 = 34. The +58 is not the profit growth rate itself: it is the part of the price move that profit growth explains.

Not shown for 5 years: earnings were negative at one end, or there is not enough history.

Net profit is trailing twelve months as reported with a 60-day lag.

Compare this with VARDHMAN TEXTILES LIMTED

How rough has the ride been?

Maximum drawdown-54.4%recovered 2026-05
1-year volatility50.1%annualised
Beta vs sector index1.373-year daily, correlation 0.47
Volume spikes5last 90 sessions, 5x the 50-day median

Drawdown from peak

0%−20%−40%2023202420252026−52.6% 0%−20%−40%2023202420252026−52.6%
Largest drawdowns

-54.4% (2024-09 peak to 2025-03 low, recovered 2026-05)

-37.9% (2022-08 peak to 2023-02 low, recovered 2024-07)

-19.2% (2026-09 peak to 2026-11 low, not yet recovered)

Most recent volume spikes

2026-11-02: 13.1x the 50-day median, price -0.7% that day

2026-10-30: 26.4x the 50-day median, price -12.7% that day

2026-10-14: 10.2x the 50-day median, price +7.8% that day

Beta is the slope of daily returns against a market-cap-weighted index of the sector's other listed companies, built from today's constituents (so it excludes companies no longer listed).

Is it expensive against its own past and its peers?

15.5xP/E todayNear its historic high
Against its own history85th percentile
CheapestMedian 10.0xDearest

Usual range 2.3x to 17.7x since 2022-08.

Against Process Industries15.5x vs 18.1x
This company
15.5x
Sector median
18.1x

14% below the Process Industries median.

2.1x12.3x22.5x32.7xAug '22Jul '23Jun '24May '25Apr '26Nov '262.1x12.3x22.5x32.7xAug '22Jan '24Jun '25Nov '26
P/E (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianProcess Industries median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/B (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianProcess Industries median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/S (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianProcess Industries median
How to read this

Shaded band: 10th to 90th percentile of the company's own P/E history; dotted line: its median; orange line: sector median (companies with a positive multiple, at least 5 in the sector).

Sector figures are built from today's listed companies, so they exclude companies that are no longer listed.

All terms explained in the glossary →

How Process Industries is valued

Where does it rank among Process Industries peers?

Each cell is the company's percentile rank among its Process Industries peers (non-financial companies) that month.
Darker is better-ranked.
Rows marked ↓ are inverted (lower debt, shorter cash cycle and a lower P/E rank higher).

Where it ranks today

  • ROCE59th▲ 4 pts vs a year ago
  • Op. margin81st▲ 18 pts vs a year ago
  • Revenue growth46th▲ 10 pts vs a year ago
  • EPS growth73rd▼ 4 pts vs a year ago
  • Debt/equity ↓39th▲ 8 pts vs a year ago
  • Cash cycle ↓41st▲ 7 pts vs a year ago
  • P/E ↓57th▼ 28 pts vs a year ago
  • 12M momentum96th▲ 21 pts vs a year ago

Rank history

ROCE
Op. margin
Revenue growth
EPS growth
Debt/equity ↓
Cash cycle ↓
P/E ↓
12M momentum
Dec '21Jul '22Jan '23Jul '23Jan '24Jul '24Jan '25Jul '25Jan '26Jul '26Nov '26
Lower rank Higher rank Not enough data

Percentiles use today's listed companies in the sector and need at least 5 peers with a value; grey cells have too few.
ROE is computed from net profit and book value where the source does not report it.

The Process Industries sector page Watch it move against Process Industries in the Observatory

What is the price implying?

~12%annual earnings growth implied by the priceBelow delivered growth

At normalised P/E (five-year average earnings) of 14.9x, a holder earning 12%/yr needs earnings to grow about 11.9%/yr for 10 years, then trade at 15x.

Delivered26.6%/yrEPS, last 10 fiscal years · 3-yr avg to 3-yr avg
Gap−14.8 ptsimplied minus delivered
Rank751stmost demanding of 856

Over time

Implied growth by month (solid) and delivered growth (dashed).

0%34%67% Jun 2020Nov 2026 0%34%67% Jun 2020Nov 2026

Change the assumptions

Exit P/E / return11%12%13%
12x13.3%14.4%15.4%
15x10.9%11.9%12.9%
20x7.7%8.7%9.7%

Drag a slider to test other assumptions

Implied: 11.9%/yr

“Implied growth” is what the current price would require under our stated assumptions, not what we expect. How this is calculated and the market-wide lists.

What prices imply across Process Industries The market-wide Expectations lists

Key figures

Share Priceclose 9 Nov
₹197.54
P/E
15.5x
ROCE
13.0%
Market Cap
₹2504 cr
Revenue (TTM)
₹2614 cr
P/S
1.0x
P/B
2.4x
ROE
15.5%
Operating Margin
19.0%
Debt / Equity
0.5x
Promoter Holding
74.4%
12M Momentum
109.4%

52-week range

₹78.17₹241.51
73% of the way from its 52-week low to its high

Price risk

1Y volatility
50.1%
Beta vs sector
1-year daily
1.52

Balance sheet & cash

Interest cover
operating profit ÷ interest
6.0x
Cash from profit, 3Y
operating cash flow ÷ net profit
1.55x
Share count, 1Y
unchanged

Are profits backed by cash?

7 of 7checks within rangeAll clear
Other income reliance2%Within range

Other income as a share of pre-tax profit (trailing twelve months): 2.3%. Bands: below 15%, 15% to 35%, above 35%.

Tax rate26%Within range

Median quarterly effective tax rate over about 2.5 years: 26.0%. Bands: 15% to 35%, 5% to 15% or 35% to 50%, outside 5% to 50%.

Cash conversion1.55xWithin range

Operating cash flow divided by net profit over the last three fiscal years: 1.55x (cash from operations ₹471 cr, net profit ₹303 cr). Bands: 0.8x and above, 0.5x to 0.8x, below 0.5x.

Free cash flow4 of 5 yrsWithin range

Fiscal years with positive free cash flow in the last 5: 4. Bands: at least 80% of years, 40% to 80%, below 40%.

Receivable days vs history+3 daysWithin range

Debtor days are above the median of the previous three fiscal years by 3 days (58 vs 55). Bands: under 15 days, 15 to 45, over 45.

Capital work in progress2% of fixed assetsWithin range

Capital work-in-progress is 2% of fixed assets. Bands: not rising or up to 30%; rising for three years and above 30%; rising and above 60%.

Payable days-6 days / 2 yrsWithin range

Days payable changed by -6 over two years. Bands: rise of up to 30 days; more than 30 days.

Tap a check to see how it is measured

How to read this

Each check is a named rule with fixed thresholds, not a score. Annual statements are the latest restated figures, so a past year may differ from what was originally reported.

All terms explained in the glossary →

Who has been buying and selling?

  • Over 2 years, institutional and promoter holdings were broadly unchanged.
  • The number of shareholders rose from 19,873 to 22,449 (+13%) between Dec 2023 and Jun 2026.

Holdings, Jun '26

How each group changed

GroupDec '23Jun '26Change
Promoters74.4%74.4%0.0 pts
FIIs0.0%0.4%+0.4 pts
DIIs0.0%0.0%0.0 pts
Public and others25.6%25.3%-0.4 pts

Number of shareholders

22,449shareholders+13% since Dec '23
17k20k24k27k Dec '23Jun '24Dec '24Jun '25Dec '25Jun '26
Dec '23: 19,873
Mar '24: 18,770
Jun '24: 17,120
Sep '24: 25,563
Dec '24: 26,904
Mar '25: 26,871
Jun '25: 26,347
Sep '25: 26,294
Dec '25: 25,523
Mar '26: 23,089
Jun '26: 22,449
17k20k24k27k Dec '23Dec '24Dec '25Jun '26
Dec '23: 19,873
Mar '24: 18,770
Jun '24: 17,120
Sep '24: 25,563
Dec '24: 26,904
Mar '25: 26,871
Jun '25: 26,347
Sep '25: 26,294
Dec '25: 25,523
Mar '26: 23,089
Jun '26: 22,449

Quarterly shareholding as reported, labelled by the quarter it covers (it becomes visible about two months later).
Shareholder counts are only available for recent quarters.

This quarter's smart-money board

What happened next to similar setups

+9.6%typical 12-month return vs the marketNot meaningfully different from the base rate
  • We found 50 past situations where a non-financial company looked like SPORTKING INDIA LIMITED today on valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, price momentum, size and volatility.
  • Over the following 12 months the middle half of them returned −20% to +54% vs the market, against −2% for all non-financial companies in the same months.
  • The gap against the base rate (+11.5%, 80% range −2.1% to +31.0%) is within what chance and overlapping periods produce.

Where the 50 outcomes landed

−100%−50%0%+50%+100%
PRECOT · Feb 2022: −58.0% vs market
ELECTCAST · Aug 2024: −50.7% vs market
KSL · Dec 2024: −37.4% vs market
PATELENG · Aug 2023: −32.1% vs market
TCPLPACK · Apr 2025: −31.3% vs market
GRMOVER · Jul 2025: −31.2% vs market
JKLAKSHMI · Apr 2023: −31.1% vs market
MAGADSUGAR · Nov 2023: −28.9% vs market
DCMSRIND · May 2024: −25.7% vs market
TRIVENI · Jan 2020: −24.3% vs market
JSL · Aug 2021: −20.6% vs market
AWHCL · Jul 2024: −20.3% vs market
CLSEL · Mar 2023: −20.2% vs market
SURYAROSNI · May 2021: −19.9% vs market
JKIL · Jan 2020: −19.0% vs market
DEEPAKFERT · Mar 2025: −16.3% vs market
SARLAPOLY · Nov 2024: −16.3% vs market
EVEREADY · Apr 2021: −11.7% vs market
GNA · Aug 2021: −10.5% vs market
ICIL · Dec 2023: −9.8% vs market
MANINDS · Nov 2023: −4.3% vs market
TALBROAUTO · Oct 2023: −1.6% vs market
NCLIND · Nov 2020: +4.9% vs market
SPAL · Jul 2021: +7.5% vs market
DALMIASUG · May 2021: +9.5% vs market
PGIL · Oct 2023: +9.8% vs market
FIEMIND · Sep 2020: +19.5% vs market
TRANSWORLD · Aug 2021: +22.7% vs market
LTFOODS · Jan 2023: +22.9% vs market
TIMETECHNO · May 2024: +30.5% vs market
VISHNU · Apr 2025: +31.0% vs market
TIIL · May 2022: +31.7% vs market
PITTIENG · Dec 2021: +33.0% vs market
ARVIND · Dec 2023: +33.5% vs market
UNIVCABLES · Jul 2023: +34.1% vs market
SKMEGGPROD · Sep 2025: +34.4% vs market
FILATEX · Mar 2021: +53.3% vs market
USHAMART · Oct 2021: +54.7% vs market
KIRLOSENG · Jan 2023: +63.1% vs market
GALLANTT · Nov 2024: +63.8% vs market
POWERMECH · Feb 2023: +69.1% vs market
SALASAR · Oct 2020: +69.1% vs market
BBL · Jul 2023: +80.4% vs market
SARDAEN · Aug 2020: +82.3% vs market
GPIL · Feb 2021: +83.9% vs market
KOPRAN · Aug 2020: +102.3% vs market
COSMOFIRST · Sep 2020: +122.8% vs market
IRCON · May 2023: +132.4% vs market
RVNL · Mar 2023: +148.1% vs market
JWL · May 2023: +219.5% vs market
Similar setups +9.6%All companies −1.9%← worse than the marketbetter than the market →

Each dot is one past situation (hover or tap for details) · Solid dots are the closest matches, listed below · Shaded is the middle half of all companies in the same months · 5 beyond the range shown, drawn at the edge

Similar setups' median
+9.6%
All companies' median
−1.9%
Beat the market
56% vs 48%

50 past situations · 50 companies · 34 months · 2020–2025

The closest matches

CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
USHAMART
Producer Manufacturing
Oct 2021 18x13% +312%−8% +55%
ARVIND
Process Industries
Dec 2023 17x13% +192%−2% +34%
LTFOODS
Process Industries
Jan 2023 13x14% +62%−15% +23%
ELECTCAST
Non-Energy Minerals
Aug 2024 17x16% +212%−4% −51%
GALLANTT
Non-Energy Minerals
Nov 2024 27x12% +260%−12% +64%
Show the other 3 matches
CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
SURYAROSNI
Non-Energy Minerals
May 2021 25x11% +458%−6% −20%
TIMETECHNO
Process Industries
May 2024 29x13% +196%−5% +31%
PGIL
Consumer Non-Durables
Oct 2023 18x19% +207%−10% +10%
How reliable is this?

Matched on P/E, P/S, ROCE, operating margin, debt/equity, interest cover, revenue growth, 12-month momentum, drawdown from 12-month high, size and volatility. Closest on: drawdown from 12-month high, P/E and ROCE. One match per company and at most 7 from any one month.

Independent periods: the matches fall in 6 distinct 12-month windows. Matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, so fewer windows means less evidence.

How this is built

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to SPORTKING INDIA LIMITED. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

Methodology

How historical analogs are built

Data as of 2026-11-09. Outcome pool: Jan 2020 to Oct 2025.

For every company we look at the situation it is in today (valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, 12-month price momentum, drawdown, size and volatility) and find past company-months that looked most like it. We then show what happened to those past situations over the following 12 months, measured against the ApnaFunda All index and against the base rate. It describes history. It does not predict anything.

What is compared

FeatureWeightNon-financialFinancial
P/E1yesyes
P/S1yes—
P/B1—yes
ROCE1yes—
operating margin1yes—
ROE1—yes
debt/equity0.75yes—
interest cover0.5yes—
revenue growth0.75yesyes
12-month momentum1yesyes
drawdown from 12-month high0.75yesyes
size0.75yesyes
volatility0.5yesyes

Weights were set by judgement before any outcome was looked at and are never tuned on results. Loss-making companies (negative P/E or net profit) are only matched with other loss-making companies. Banks, NBFCs and insurers are compared only with each other and use a different feature set. Every feature is converted, month by month, to its rank among companies in the same pool in that month, so a P/E of 30 in a hot market and a P/E of 22 in a cold one can match if both were equally expensive for their time. Only that month's data is used.

How closeness and the sample are defined

Distance is the weighted root-mean-square gap between the standardised features both companies have. A match needs at least 70% of the query's feature weight, a distance of at most 0.9, and 30 matches at minimum to be shown. We keep up to 50 matches with these exclusions: never the company itself, one match per company (its closest month), and at most 7 from any one calendar month so a single market episode cannot dominate.

Base rate

The base rate is the distribution of 12-month returns, relative to the market, of every eligible company-month in the same pool, with each month weighted to match the months the analogs came from. It answers: how did a random company do in these same months? Because matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, we also report the number of distinct 12-month windows behind a result, and a bootstrap that resamples months decides whether the analog median differs from the base rate at all. "Not meaningfully different" is the usual outcome and the page copy is written for it.

Limits you should know

  • One market period. The outcome pool covers 2020–2025 only (70 months), including the 2020 crash and the 2020–21 rally.
  • Survivorship. Only companies listed today are included. Delisted and bankrupt companies are missing, which flatters past outcomes, particularly for distressed-looking setups.
  • Price return only. Dividends are excluded, and the benchmark is an ApnaFunda market-cap-weighted index of the same listed companies, not an official index.
  • Reporting lag. Fundamentals are matched on an assumed 60-day lag after the quarter end, not on real announcement dates.
  • Pools: non-financial: 98,395 company-months from 2019 companies; financial: 5,659 company-months from 108 companies. 2349 companies currently have a result; the rest are suppressed because too few comparable situations exist.

Does it work? A walk-forward check

The walk-forward check has not been run for this build, so skill is shown as not yet measured.

Disclaimer

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to any company shown. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

What else looks like this?

Companies with the most similar financial profile today, regardless of industry.

Producer Manufacturing
64%similar
market capvolatility
Consumer Non-Durables
63%similar
EPS growthvolatility
Energy Minerals
61%similar
market capoperating margin
BIRLA CABLEBIRLACABLE
Producer Manufacturing
59%similar
debt/equityoperating margin
Producer Manufacturing
59%similar
EPS growthpromoter holding
Process Industries
67%similar
ROCEmarket cap
EPIGRALEPIGRAL
Process Industries
62%similar
revenuerevenue growth
Process Industries
56%similar
promoter holdingrevenue

Similarity is statistical, based on reported metrics; it does not imply similar business quality or future returns.

What changed?

30 events since Jun '23

  1. OctPriceVolume reached 26.4x its 50-day median on 2026-10-30; price -12.7% that day.
  2. SepResultsRevenue (TTM) reached a new high of ₹2,614 cr.
  3. SepPeer rankMoved into the top quartile of Process Industries on operating margin (from the 2nd quartile).
  4. AugPriceVolume reached 32.8x its 50-day median on 2026-08-03; price +14.1% that day.
  5. JunPeer rankSlipped to the 3rd quartile of Process Industries on EPS growth (from the 2nd quartile).
  6. JunPriceVolume reached 15.5x its 50-day median on 2026-06-01; price +8.9% that day.
  7. MayPriceRegained the 2024-09 peak, 14 months after the low.
  8. AprValuationP/E crossed above the 90th percentile of its own history to date (15.3x).
Show 22 earlier events
  1. FebPriceVolume reached 14.1x its 50-day median on 2026-02-09; price +11.3% that day.
  2. DecPeer rankSlipped to the 2nd quartile of Process Industries on EPS growth (from the top quartile).
  3. OctPriceVolume reached 16.3x its 50-day median on 2025-10-23; price +7.6% that day.
  4. JulPriceVolume reached 13.7x its 50-day median on 2025-07-16; price +5.8% that day.
  5. JunResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned positive.
  6. JunPeer rankMoved into the 2nd quartile of Process Industries on ROCE (from the 3rd quartile).
  7. JunDebtDebt / equity fell below 1.0x (0.71x).
  8. MayPriceVolume reached 25.4x its 50-day median on 2025-05-02; price +20.0% that day.
  9. MarPriceFell 54% from the Sep 2024 peak to the Mar 2025 low.
  10. DecPriceVolume reached 5.2x its 50-day median on 2024-12-17; price +7.0% that day.
  11. AugValuationP/E crossed above the 90th percentile of its own history to date (26.5x).
  12. JulPriceRegained the 2022-08 peak, 17 months after the low.
  13. JulPriceVolume reached 126.2x its 50-day median on 2024-07-22; price +15.4% that day.
  14. JunResultsRevenue (TTM) reached a new high of ₹2,376 cr.
  15. JunPeer rankSlipped to the 3rd quartile of Process Industries on ROCE (from the 2nd quartile).
  16. JunDebtDebt / equity rose above 1.0x (1.16x).
  17. JunDividendStarted paying a dividend (payout 1% of profit).
  18. FebPriceVolume reached 13.0x its 50-day median on 2024-02-07; price +8.6% that day.
  19. DecPriceVolume reached 7.6x its 50-day median on 2023-12-29; price +4.9% that day.
  20. JulPriceVolume reached 21.7x its 50-day median on 2023-07-19; price +7.8% that day.
  21. JunPeer rankSlipped to the 2nd quartile of Process Industries on ROCE (from the top quartile).
  22. JunPriceVolume reached 27.1x its 50-day median on 2023-06-27; price +6.5% that day.

Events are generated from the data by fixed rules.
The month shown is when the change became visible in the reported figures, assuming a 60-day lag after each quarter end; it is not an announcement date.

Where price and fundamentals disagree, market-wide Rewind the whole market to any month

Monthly history52 months · 2022-08 to 2026-11
MonthP/ERevenue (TTM)ROEROCEDebt / Equity
2026-1115.5x₹2614 cr15.5%13.0%0.5x
2026-1014.7x₹2614 cr15.6%13.0%0.5x
2026-0916.5x₹2614 cr15.6%13.0%0.5x
2026-0824.1x₹2496 cr11.5%13.0%0.5x
2026-0721.4x₹2496 cr11.5%13.0%0.5x
2026-0618.5x₹2496 cr11.5%13.0%0.5x
2026-0517.7x₹2488 cr13.1%12.0%0.7x
2026-0415.3x₹2488 cr13.1%12.0%0.7x
2026-0311.7x₹2488 cr13.1%12.0%0.7x
2026-0212.6x₹2452 cr12.4%12.0%0.7x
2026-019.9x₹2452 cr12.4%12.0%0.7x
2025-129.5x₹2452 cr12.4%12.0%0.7x
2025-1110.2x₹2477 cr12.6%12.0%0.7x
2025-1010.7x₹2477 cr12.6%12.0%0.7x
2025-0910.6x₹2477 cr12.6%12.0%0.7x
2025-0811.8x₹2525 cr12.4%12.0%0.7x
2025-0712.6x₹2525 cr12.4%12.0%0.7x
2025-0612.9x₹2525 cr12.4%12.0%0.7x
2025-0513.4x₹2507 cr12.5%10.0%1.2x
2025-0411.4x₹2507 cr12.5%10.0%1.2x
2025-039.4x₹2507 cr12.5%10.0%1.2x
2025-029.6x₹2496 cr12.0%10.0%1.2x
2025-0111.8x₹2496 cr12.0%10.0%1.2x
2024-1213.5x₹2496 cr12.0%10.0%1.2x
2024-1114.9x₹2472 cr10.3%10.0%1.2x
2024-1015.4x₹2472 cr10.3%10.0%1.2x
2024-0917.2x₹2472 cr10.3%10.0%1.2x
2024-0826.5x₹2376 cr8.5%10.0%1.2x
2024-0724.4x₹2376 cr8.5%10.0%1.2x
2024-0615.3x₹2376 cr8.5%10.0%1.2x
2024-057.8x₹2204 cr16.1%18.0%0.7x
2024-048.6x₹2204 cr16.1%18.0%0.7x
2024-038.0x₹2204 cr16.1%18.0%0.7x
2024-028.3x₹2204 cr16.1%18.0%0.7x
2024-018.0x₹2204 cr16.1%18.0%0.7x
2023-128.3x₹2204 cr16.1%18.0%0.7x
2023-118.3x₹2204 cr16.1%18.0%0.7x
2023-107.9x₹2204 cr16.1%18.0%0.7x
2023-098.2x₹2204 cr16.1%18.0%0.7x
2023-088.5x₹2204 cr16.1%18.0%0.7x
2023-077.9x₹2204 cr16.1%18.0%0.7x
2023-068.6x₹2204 cr16.1%18.0%0.7x
2023-052.2x₹2153 cr59.3%53.0%0.9x
2023-042.3x₹2153 cr59.3%53.0%0.9x
2023-032.1x₹2153 cr59.3%53.0%0.9x
2023-022.1x₹2153 cr59.3%53.0%0.9x
2023-012.3x₹2153 cr59.3%53.0%0.9x
2022-122.3x₹2153 cr59.3%53.0%0.9x
2022-112.3x₹2153 cr59.3%53.0%0.9x
2022-102.2x₹2153 cr59.3%53.0%0.9x
2022-092.4x₹2153 cr59.3%53.0%0.9x
2022-083.0x₹2153 cr59.3%53.0%0.9x

Methodology and data notes

Methodology

Methodology and data notes

All figures come from public exchange prices and screener.in financial statements. Quarterly and annual results are shown from 60 days after the period end, so a month never uses a result before it would plausibly have been published. Statements are the latest versions, which may include later restatements.

Sector medians, percentiles and indices use today's listed companies in the sector (survivorship bias). Prices are adjusted for splits and bonus issues; around a corporate action the fundamentals may lag the price by up to a month, and affected sections are hidden.

The return decomposition uses price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count. The reverse DCF uses a fixed 12% cost of equity, a 10-year horizon and a 15x terminal P/E, and is an illustration only. Events, flags and twins follow fixed rules and thresholds described next to each section.

Feedback