TIME TECHNOPLAST LIMITED (TIMETECHNO): Financials & Fundamentals History

Share price

Closing priceAdjusted for splits and bonus issues.

3M1Y3YAll

₹187.91 latest close · +3.8% over the last 90 sessions

₹187.91 month-end · −6.3% over 12 months

₹187.91 month-end · +112.9% over 3 years

₹187.91 month-end · +289.0% since Jan '19

52-week range ₹153.60 to ₹218.20 · 1-year volatility 36.4%

Was the rally earned?

1 year3 years5 years

-6%share price, 1 yearLower P/E held it back

Earnings helped, the multiple did not.

Per-share earnings added 12 points, but investors now pay less per rupee of profit (P/E 22.5x to 18.6x), which took 19 points back.
The share count rose 7%.

Net profit growth+19 ptsNet profit rose about 21%, which lifts the price.

P/E change-19 ptsThe P/E fell from 22.5x to 18.6x, which lowers the price.

Share count change-6 ptsShare count rose 7%, which lowers the price.

+113%share price, 3 yearsEarnings-driven

Mostly yes.

Per-share earnings added 110 points to the rise, while the multiple moved less (P/E 18.2x to 18.6x).
The share count rose 7%.

Net profit growth+120 ptsNet profit rose about 123%, which lifts the price.

P/E change+3 ptsThe P/E rose from 18.2x to 18.6x, which lifts the price.

Share count change-9 ptsShare count rose 7%, which lowers the price.

+412%share price, 5 yearsEarnings-driven

Mostly yes.

Per-share earnings added 375 points to the rise, while the multiple moved less (P/E 16.0x to 18.6x).
The share count rose 7%.

Net profit growth+391 ptsNet profit rose about 371%, which lifts the price.

P/E change+37 ptsThe P/E rose from 16.0x to 18.6x, which lifts the price.

Share count change-16 ptsShare count rose 7%, which lowers the price.

What do "pts" mean?

"pts" are percentage points of the share price return. The parts add up to the total shown for each period. Because price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count, higher profit pushes the price up, a higher P/E pushes it up, and more shares push it down.

Example: if the price rose 34% and profit growth accounts for +58 pts while a lower P/E accounts for -24 pts, then 58 - 24 = 34. The +58 is not the profit growth rate itself: it is the part of the price move that profit growth explains.

Net profit is trailing twelve months as reported with a 60-day lag.

Compare this with EPL

How rough has the ride been?

Maximum drawdown-77.6%recovered 2022-06

1-year volatility36.4%annualised

Beta vs sector index1.453-year daily, correlation 0.54

Volume spikes0last 90 sessions, 5x the 50-day median

Drawdown from peak

Largest drawdowns

-77.6% (2019-04 peak to 2020-03 low, recovered 2022-06)

-43.5% (2022-09 peak to 2023-03 low, recovered 2023-06)

-38.5% (2024-12 peak to 2025-05 low, not yet recovered)

Beta is the slope of daily returns against a market-cap-weighted index of the sector's other listed companies, built from today's constituents (so it excludes companies no longer listed).

Is it expensive against its own past and its peers?

18.6xP/E todayWithin its usual range

Against its own history67th percentile

CheapestMedian 15.6xDearest

Usual range 5.9x to 25.9x since 2019-01.

Against Process Industries18.6x vs 18.1x

This company

18.6x

Sector median

18.1x

Close to the Process Industries median.

P/EP/BP/S

P/E (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianProcess Industries median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/B (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianProcess Industries median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/S (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianProcess Industries median

How to read this

Shaded band: 10th to 90th percentile of the company's own P/E history; dotted line: its median; orange line: sector median (companies with a positive multiple, at least 5 in the sector).

Sector figures are built from today's listed companies, so they exclude companies that are no longer listed.

All terms explained in the glossary →

How Process Industries is valued

Where does it rank among Process Industries peers?

Each cell is the company's percentile rank among its Process Industries peers (non-financial companies) that month.
Darker is better-ranked.
Rows marked ↓ are inverted (lower debt, shorter cash cycle and a lower P/E rank higher).

Where it ranks today

ROCE72ndflat vs a year ago
Op. margin58th▼ 15 pts vs a year ago
Revenue growth68th▲ 15 pts vs a year ago
EPS growth55th▼ 11 pts vs a year ago
Debt/equity ↓69th▲ 8 pts vs a year ago
Cash cycle ↓29th▼ 3 pts vs a year ago
P/E ↓48thflat vs a year ago
12M momentum54th▼ 14 pts vs a year ago

Rank history

ROCE

Op. margin

Revenue growth

EPS growth

Debt/equity ↓

Cash cycle ↓

P/E ↓

12M momentum

Dec '21Jul '22Jan '23Jul '23Jan '24Jul '24Jan '25Jul '25Jan '26Jul '26Nov '26

Lower rank Higher rank Not enough data

Percentiles use today's listed companies in the sector and need at least 5 peers with a value; grey cells have too few.
ROE is computed from net profit and book value where the source does not report it.

The Process Industries sector page Watch it move against Process Industries in the Observatory

What is the price implying?

~19%annual earnings growth implied by the priceAbove delivered growth

At normalised P/E (five-year average earnings) of 28.8x, a holder earning 12%/yr needs earnings to grow about 18.7%/yr for 10 years, then trade at 15x.

Delivered11.4%/yrEPS, last 10 fiscal years · 3-yr avg to 3-yr avg

Gap+7.3 ptsimplied minus delivered

Rank384thmost demanding of 856

Over time

Implied growth by month (solid) and delivered growth (dashed).

Change the assumptions

Exit P/E / return	11%	12%	13%
12x	20.1%	21.2%	22.3%
15x	17.6%	18.7%	19.7%
20x	14.4%	15.4%	16.5%

Drag a slider to test other assumptions

Required return 12.0% Years 10 Exit P/E 15x Implied: 18.7%/yr

Looking back

Jan 2020Price implied 4%/yr; EPS has since grown 11%/yr (7.0 yrs)
Jan 2021Price implied 3%/yr; EPS has since grown 17%/yr (6.0 yrs)
Jan 2022Price implied 9%/yr; EPS has since grown 33%/yr (5.0 yrs)

Past comparisons cover only companies listed today (survivorship bias) and say nothing about future outcomes.

“Implied growth” is what the current price would require under our stated assumptions, not what we expect. How this is calculated and the market-wide lists.

What prices imply across Process Industries The market-wide Expectations lists

Key figures

Share Priceclose 9 Nov: ₹187.91
P/E: 18.6x
ROCE: 17.0%
Market Cap: ₹9263 cr
Revenue (TTM): ₹6446 cr
P/S: 1.4x
P/B: 2.3x
ROE: 12.2%
Operating Margin: 13.0%
Debt / Equity: 0.2x
Promoter Holding: 47.6%
12M Momentum: -6.3%

52-week range

₹153.60₹218.20

53% of the way from its 52-week low to its high

Price risk

1Y volatility

36.4%

Beta vs sector

1-year daily

1.33

Balance sheet & cash

Interest cover

operating profit ÷ interest

9.8x

Cash from profit, 3Y

operating cash flow ÷ net profit

0.90x

Share count, 1Y

+113.0%

Are profits backed by cash?

7 of 7checks within rangeAll clear

Other income reliance1%Within range

Other income as a share of pre-tax profit (trailing twelve months): 1.4%. Bands: below 15%, 15% to 35%, above 35%.

Tax rate25%Within range

Median quarterly effective tax rate over about 2.5 years: 25.0%. Bands: 15% to 35%, 5% to 15% or 35% to 50%, outside 5% to 50%.

Cash conversion0.90xWithin range

Operating cash flow divided by net profit over the last three fiscal years: 0.90x (cash from operations ₹1,070 cr, net profit ₹1,187 cr). Bands: 0.8x and above, 0.5x to 0.8x, below 0.5x.

Free cash flow4 of 5 yrsWithin range

Fiscal years with positive free cash flow in the last 5: 4. Bands: at least 80% of years, 40% to 80%, below 40%.

Receivable days vs history+8 daysWithin range

Debtor days are above the median of the previous three fiscal years by 8 days (87 vs 79). Bands: under 15 days, 15 to 45, over 45.

Capital work in progress16% of fixed assetsWithin range

Capital work-in-progress is 16% of fixed assets. Bands: not rising or up to 30%; rising for three years and above 30%; rising and above 60%.

Payable days-8 days / 2 yrsWithin range

Days payable changed by -8 over two years. Bands: rise of up to 30 days; more than 30 days.

Tap a check to see how it is measured

How to read this

Each check is a named rule with fixed thresholds, not a score. Annual statements are the latest restated figures, so a past year may differ from what was originally reported.

All terms explained in the glossary →

Who has been buying and selling?

Over 2 years, DIIs added 7.1 pts; promoters trimmed 3.9 pts; FIIs added 2.8 pts.
The number of shareholders rose from 74,109 to 1.4 lakh (+89%) between Dec 2023 and Jun 2026.

Holdings, Jun '26

How each group changed

GroupDec '23Jun '26Change

Promoters51.5%47.6%-3.9 pts

FIIs5.7%8.5%+2.8 pts

DIIs10.4%17.6%+7.1 pts

Public and others32.4%26.3%-6.0 pts

Number of shareholders

1.4 lakhshareholders+89% since Dec '23

Quarterly shareholding as reported, labelled by the quarter it covers (it becomes visible about two months later).
Shareholder counts are only available for recent quarters.

This quarter's smart-money board

What happened next to similar setups

+2.5%typical 12-month return vs the marketNot meaningfully different from the base rate

We found 50 past situations where a non-financial company looked like TIME TECHNOPLAST LIMITED today on valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, price momentum, size and volatility.
Over the following 12 months the middle half of them returned −22% to +24% vs the market, against −6% for all non-financial companies in the same months.
The gap against the base rate (+8.0%, 80% range −0.7% to +10.4%) is within what chance and overlapping periods produce.

Where the 50 outcomes landed

Each dot is one past situation (hover or tap for details) · Solid dots are the closest matches, listed below · Shaded is the middle half of all companies in the same months · 3 beyond the range shown, drawn at the edge

Similar setups' median

+2.5%

All companies' median

−5.5%

Beat the market

54% vs 44%

50 past situations · 50 companies · 34 months · 2020–2025

The closest matches

Company	When	P/E	ROCE	12M mom.	Drawdown	Next 12 months
MASTEK Technology Services	Oct 2024	30x	18%	+31%	−8%	−28%
TCI Transportation	Jan 2025	22x	20%	+13%	−16%	−6%
FSL Commercial Services	Jun 2024	28x	16%	+65%	−4%	+75%
GALAXYSURF Consumer Non-Durables	Jun 2025	30x	16%	−5%	−22%	−25%
ZENSARTECH Technology Services	Oct 2020	15x	18%	0%	−14%	+63%

Show the other 3 matches

Company	When	P/E	ROCE	12M mom.	Drawdown	Next 12 months
USHAMART Producer Manufacturing	Mar 2024	28x	21%	+48%	−14%	+2%
GRANULES Health Technology	Mar 2024	20x	19%	+48%	−9%	+9%
VSSL Non-Energy Minerals	Jun 2024	28x	—	+66%	−7%	−18%

How reliable is this?

Matched on P/E, P/S, ROCE, operating margin, debt/equity, interest cover, revenue growth, 12-month momentum, drawdown from 12-month high, size and volatility. Closest on: 12-month momentum, P/S and drawdown from 12-month high. One match per company and at most 7 from any one month.

Independent periods: the matches fall in 6 distinct 12-month windows. Matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, so fewer windows means less evidence.

How this is built

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to TIME TECHNOPLAST LIMITED. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

Methodology

How historical analogs are built

Data as of 2026-11-09. Outcome pool: Jan 2020 to Oct 2025.

For every company we look at the situation it is in today (valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, 12-month price momentum, drawdown, size and volatility) and find past company-months that looked most like it. We then show what happened to those past situations over the following 12 months, measured against the ApnaFunda All index and against the base rate. It describes history. It does not predict anything.

What is compared

Feature	Weight	Non-financial	Financial
P/E	1	yes	yes
P/S	1	yes	—
P/B	1	—	yes
ROCE	1	yes	—
operating margin	1	yes	—
ROE	1	—	yes
debt/equity	0.75	yes	—
interest cover	0.5	yes	—
revenue growth	0.75	yes	yes
12-month momentum	1	yes	yes
drawdown from 12-month high	0.75	yes	yes
size	0.75	yes	yes
volatility	0.5	yes	yes

Weights were set by judgement before any outcome was looked at and are never tuned on results. Loss-making companies (negative P/E or net profit) are only matched with other loss-making companies. Banks, NBFCs and insurers are compared only with each other and use a different feature set. Every feature is converted, month by month, to its rank among companies in the same pool in that month, so a P/E of 30 in a hot market and a P/E of 22 in a cold one can match if both were equally expensive for their time. Only that month's data is used.

How closeness and the sample are defined

Distance is the weighted root-mean-square gap between the standardised features both companies have. A match needs at least 70% of the query's feature weight, a distance of at most 0.9, and 30 matches at minimum to be shown. We keep up to 50 matches with these exclusions: never the company itself, one match per company (its closest month), and at most 7 from any one calendar month so a single market episode cannot dominate.

Base rate

The base rate is the distribution of 12-month returns, relative to the market, of every eligible company-month in the same pool, with each month weighted to match the months the analogs came from. It answers: how did a random company do in these same months? Because matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, we also report the number of distinct 12-month windows behind a result, and a bootstrap that resamples months decides whether the analog median differs from the base rate at all. "Not meaningfully different" is the usual outcome and the page copy is written for it.

Limits you should know

One market period. The outcome pool covers 2020–2025 only (70 months), including the 2020 crash and the 2020–21 rally.
Survivorship. Only companies listed today are included. Delisted and bankrupt companies are missing, which flatters past outcomes, particularly for distressed-looking setups.
Price return only. Dividends are excluded, and the benchmark is an ApnaFunda market-cap-weighted index of the same listed companies, not an official index.
Reporting lag. Fundamentals are matched on an assumed 60-day lag after the quarter end, not on real announcement dates.
Pools: non-financial: 98,395 company-months from 2019 companies; financial: 5,659 company-months from 108 companies. 2349 companies currently have a result; the rest are suppressed because too few comparable situations exist.

Does it work? A walk-forward check

The walk-forward check has not been run for this build, so skill is shown as not yet measured.

Disclaimer

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to any company shown. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

What else looks like this?

Companies with the most similar financial profile today, regardless of industry.

KIRLOSKAR FERROUS INDUSTRIES LKIRLFER

Non-Energy Minerals

71%similar

revenueP/E

POWER MECH PROJECTSPOWERMECH

Industrial Services

71%similar

revenueP/E

GRAVITA INDIAGRAVITA

Non-Energy Minerals

69%similar

volatilitymarket cap

L G BALKRISHNAN & BROSLGBBROSLTD

Producer Manufacturing

67%similar

operating marginrevenue growth

SUBROSSUBROS

Producer Manufacturing

66%similar

volatilityrevenue growth

LT FOODSLTFOODS

Process Industries

75%similar

ROCEvolatility

EPLEPL

Process Industries

69%similar

P/EROCE

AWL AGRI BUSINESSAWL

Process Industries

59%similar

P/EEPS growth

Similarity is statistical, based on reported metrics; it does not imply similar business quality or future returns.

What changed?

30 events since Apr '22

2026
JunPeer rankSlipped to the 2nd quartile of Process Industries on operating margin (from the top quartile).
JunSharesShare count is up 113.0% over 12 months.
MarPromoterPromoter holding fell 4.1 pts to 47.5%.
MarInstitutionsFII + DII holding rose 7.1 pts over 2 quarters to 28.4%.
2025
DecPeer rankMoved into the top quartile of Process Industries on operating margin (from the 2nd quartile).
AugPeer rankSlipped to the 2nd quartile of Process Industries on ROCE (from the top quartile).
JunValuationP/E crossed above the 90th percentile of its own history to date (26.0x).
JunPeer rankMoved into the top quartile of Process Industries on ROCE (from the 2nd quartile).

Show 22 earlier events

2025
JunPriceVolume reached 5.8x its 50-day median on 2025-06-09; price +7.2% that day.
MayPriceFell 38% from the Dec 2024 peak to the May 2025 low.
MarInstitutionsFII + DII holding rose 3.1 pts over 2 quarters to 20.9%.
MarPriceVolume reached 5.8x its 50-day median on 2025-03-21; price +2.4% that day.
2024
AugPriceVolume reached 9.0x its 50-day median on 2024-08-14; price +10.4% that day.
JunResultsRevenue (TTM) reached a new high of ₹4,992 cr.
JunPeer rankMoved into the 2nd quartile of Process Industries on ROCE (from the 3rd quartile).
JunPriceVolume reached 12.8x its 50-day median on 2024-06-21; price +13.5% that day.
FebPriceVolume reached 10.4x its 50-day median on 2024-02-13; price +14.6% that day.
2023
OctValuationP/E crossed above the 90th percentile of its own history to date (16.5x).
AugPeer rankSlipped to the 3rd quartile of Process Industries on ROCE (from the 2nd quartile).
JunResultsRevenue (TTM) reached a new high of ₹4,289 cr.
JunPriceRegained the 2022-09 peak, 3 months after the low.
JunPeer rankMoved into the 2nd quartile of Process Industries on ROCE (from the 3rd quartile).
JunPriceVolume reached 16.0x its 50-day median on 2023-06-02; price +8.4% that day.
MarPriceFell 44% from the Sep 2022 peak to the Mar 2023 low.
2022
DecPriceVolume reached 9.9x its 50-day median on 2022-12-27; price +6.0% that day.
AugPriceVolume reached 9.1x its 50-day median on 2022-08-25; price +9.2% that day.
JunResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned positive.
JunPriceRegained the 2019-04 peak, 27 months after the low.
JunPeer rankMoved into the 2nd quartile of Process Industries on EPS growth (from the bottom quartile).
AprValuationP/E crossed above the 90th percentile of its own history to date (21.0x).

Events are generated from the data by fixed rules.
The month shown is when the change became visible in the reported figures, assuming a 60-day lag after each quarter end; it is not an announcement date.

Where price and fundamentals disagree, market-wide Rewind the whole market to any month

Monthly history60 months · 2021-12 to 2026-11

Month	P/E	Revenue (TTM)	ROE	ROCE	Debt / Equity
2026-11	18.6x	₹6446 cr	12.2%	17.0%	0.2x
2026-10	15.7x	₹6446 cr	12.2%	17.0%	0.2x
2026-09	18.0x	₹6446 cr	12.2%	17.0%	0.2x
2026-08	19.0x	₹6106 cr	11.7%	17.0%	0.2x
2026-07	21.1x	₹6106 cr	11.7%	17.0%	0.2x
2026-06	18.2x	₹6106 cr	11.7%	17.0%	0.2x
2026-05	18.2x	₹5898 cr	15.7%	17.0%	0.3x
2026-04	20.1x	₹5898 cr	15.7%	17.0%	0.3x
2026-03	16.5x	₹5898 cr	15.7%	17.0%	0.3x
2026-02	19.8x	₹5721 cr	14.8%	17.0%	0.3x
2026-01	19.4x	₹5721 cr	14.8%	17.0%	0.3x
2025-12	20.3x	₹5721 cr	14.8%	17.0%	0.3x
2025-11	22.5x	₹5581 cr	14.2%	17.0%	0.3x
2025-10	24.2x	₹5581 cr	14.2%	17.0%	0.3x
2025-09	23.6x	₹5581 cr	14.2%	17.0%	0.3x
2025-08	26.7x	₹5458 cr	13.6%	17.0%	0.3x
2025-07	27.3x	₹5458 cr	13.6%	17.0%	0.3x
2025-06	26.0x	₹5458 cr	13.6%	17.0%	0.3x
2025-05	23.1x	₹5383 cr	14.7%	16.0%	0.3x
2025-04	20.7x	₹5383 cr	14.7%	16.0%	0.3x
2025-03	25.6x	₹5383 cr	14.7%	16.0%	0.3x
2025-02	22.4x	₹5320 cr	14.4%	16.0%	0.3x
2025-01	25.1x	₹5320 cr	14.4%	16.0%	0.3x
2024-12	31.0x	₹5320 cr	14.4%	16.0%	0.3x
2024-11	30.5x	₹5143 cr	13.2%	16.0%	0.3x
2024-10	28.8x	₹5143 cr	13.2%	16.0%	0.3x
2024-09	26.6x	₹5143 cr	13.2%	16.0%	0.3x
2024-08	29.2x	₹4992 cr	12.3%	16.0%	0.3x
2024-07	24.6x	₹4992 cr	12.3%	16.0%	0.3x
2024-06	23.5x	₹4992 cr	12.3%	16.0%	0.3x
2024-05	28.5x	₹4289 cr	9.9%	13.0%	0.4x
2024-04	28.5x	₹4289 cr	9.9%	13.0%	0.4x
2024-03	25.8x	₹4289 cr	9.9%	13.0%	0.4x
2024-02	22.4x	₹4289 cr	9.9%	13.0%	0.4x
2024-01	18.0x	₹4289 cr	9.9%	13.0%	0.4x
2023-12	18.3x	₹4289 cr	9.9%	13.0%	0.4x
2023-11	18.2x	₹4289 cr	9.9%	13.0%	0.4x
2023-10	16.5x	₹4289 cr	9.9%	13.0%	0.4x
2023-09	15.6x	₹4289 cr	9.9%	13.0%	0.4x
2023-08	15.3x	₹4289 cr	9.9%	13.0%	0.4x
2023-07	14.2x	₹4289 cr	9.9%	13.0%	0.4x
2023-06	12.3x	₹4289 cr	9.9%	13.0%	0.4x
2023-05	11.2x	₹3650 cr	9.3%	12.0%	0.4x
2023-04	10.1x	₹3650 cr	9.3%	12.0%	0.4x
2023-03	9.3x	₹3650 cr	9.3%	12.0%	0.4x
2023-02	9.7x	₹3650 cr	9.3%	12.0%	0.4x
2023-01	10.2x	₹3650 cr	9.3%	12.0%	0.4x
2022-12	10.8x	₹3650 cr	9.3%	12.0%	0.4x
2022-11	11.7x	₹3650 cr	9.3%	12.0%	0.4x
2022-10	12.3x	₹3650 cr	9.3%	12.0%	0.4x
2022-09	12.8x	₹3650 cr	9.3%	12.0%	0.4x
2022-08	14.4x	₹3650 cr	9.3%	12.0%	0.4x
2022-07	12.9x	₹3650 cr	9.3%	12.0%	0.4x
2022-06	12.4x	₹3650 cr	9.3%	12.0%	0.4x
2022-05	22.6x	₹3005 cr	5.6%	9.0%	0.5x
2022-04	21.0x	₹3005 cr	5.6%	9.0%	0.5x
2022-03	14.0x	₹3005 cr	5.6%	9.0%	0.5x
2022-02	14.9x	₹3005 cr	5.6%	9.0%	0.5x
2022-01	18.5x	₹3005 cr	5.6%	9.0%	0.5x
2021-12	16.6x	₹3005 cr	5.6%	9.0%	0.5x

Older months are in the live observatory.

Methodology and data notes