अApnaFunda

AWL AGRI BUSINESS LIMITED (AWL)

Process Industries · Agricultural Commodities/Milling · figures to Nov '26

Quality scoreHow the business itself ranks against its sector peers on profitability, 3-year growth and leverage. 50 is the middle of the sector.71 / 100
Profitability 46Growth 77Balance sheet 89
Momentum scoreHow strong the recent trend is: 3-month price change, 12-month improvement in earnings and the rise in FII + DII holding, among companies above ₹500 cr.33 / 100
Price 24Earnings 42

Passes these screensCash RichDebt-light & profitableConsistent compounders

Share price

Closing priceAdjusted for splits and bonus issues.

₹166.35 latest close · −13.0% over the last 90 sessions

₹180₹200Jul 3Jul 29Aug 24Sep 17Oct 14Nov 9 ₹180₹200Jul 3Sep 4Nov 9

₹166.35 month-end · −35.8% over 12 months

₹200₹250Nov '25Jan '26Apr '26Jun '26Sep '26Nov '26 ₹200₹250Nov '25May '26Nov '26

₹166.35 month-end · −51.2% over 3 years

₹200₹300₹400Nov '23Jun '24Jan '25Sep '25Apr '26Nov '26 ₹200₹300₹400Nov '23May '25Nov '26

₹166.35 month-end · −56.1% since Feb '22

₹200₹400₹600₹800Feb '22Mar '23Feb '24Jan '25Dec '25Nov '26 ₹200₹400₹600₹800Feb '22Aug '24Nov '26

52-week range ₹159.65 to ₹282.90 · 1-year volatility 28.6%

Was the rally earned?

-36%share price, 1 yearLower P/E held it back

Earnings helped, the multiple did not.

  • Per-share earnings added 1 point, but investors now pay less per rupee of profit (P/E 29.3x to 18.7x), which took 36 points back.
  • The share count barely moved.
Net profit growth: +1 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+1 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: −36 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−36 ptsP/E changeShare count change: 0 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.0 ptsShare count changeShare price: −36%−36%Share priceNet profit growth: +1 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+1ProfitP/E change: −36 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−36P/EShare count change: 0 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.0SharesShare price: −36%−36%Share price
Net profit growth+1 ptsNet profit was little changed.
P/E change-36 ptsThe P/E fell from 29.3x to 18.7x, which lowers the price.
Share count change0 ptsShare count was little changed. More shares would count against the price.
-51%share price, 3 yearsLower P/E held it back

Earnings helped, the multiple did not.

  • Per-share earnings added 49 points, but investors now pay less per rupee of profit (P/E 76.0x to 18.7x), which took 100 points back.
  • The share count barely moved.
Net profit growth: +49 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+49 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: −100 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−100 ptsP/E changeShare count change: 0 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.0 ptsShare count changeShare price: −51%−51%Share priceNet profit growth: +49 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+49ProfitP/E change: −100 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−100P/EShare count change: 0 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.0SharesShare price: −51%−51%Share price
Net profit growth+49 ptsNet profit rose about 99%, which lifts the price.
P/E change-100 ptsThe P/E fell from 76.0x to 18.7x, which lowers the price.
Share count change0 ptsShare count was little changed. More shares would count against the price.
What do "pts" mean?

"pts" are percentage points of the share price return. The parts add up to the total shown for each period. Because price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count, higher profit pushes the price up, a higher P/E pushes it up, and more shares push it down.

Example: if the price rose 34% and profit growth accounts for +58 pts while a lower P/E accounts for -24 pts, then 58 - 24 = 34. The +58 is not the profit growth rate itself: it is the part of the price move that profit growth explains.

Not shown for 5 years: earnings were negative at one end, or there is not enough history.

Net profit is trailing twelve months as reported with a 60-day lag.

Compare this with PATANJALI FOODS

How rough has the ride been?

Maximum drawdown-80.5%not yet recovered
1-year volatility28.6%annualised
Beta vs sector index0.953-year daily, correlation 0.45
Volume spikes5last 90 sessions, 5x the 50-day median

Drawdown from peak

0%−25%−50%−75%2023202420252026−80.5% 0%−25%−50%−75%2023202420252026−80.5%
Largest drawdowns

-80.5% (2022-04 peak to 2026-11 low, not yet recovered)

-18.6% (2022-02 peak to 2022-02 low, recovered 2022-03)

Most recent volume spikes

2026-10-28: 7.4x the 50-day median, price -6.2% that day

2026-09-29: 6.8x the 50-day median, price -1.1% that day

2026-08-25: 6.7x the 50-day median, price +3.5% that day

Beta is the slope of daily returns against a market-cap-weighted index of the sector's other listed companies, built from today's constituents (so it excludes companies no longer listed).

Is it expensive against its own past and its peers?

18.7xP/E todayNear its historic low
Against its own history4th percentile
CheapestMedian 68.6xDearest

Usual range 23.8x to 112.2x since 2022-02.

Against Process Industries18.7x vs 18.1x
This company
18.7x
Sector median
18.1x

Close to the Process Industries median.

13.7x114.9x216.2x317.5xFeb '22Feb '23Feb '24Feb '25Feb '26Nov '2613.7x114.9x216.2x317.5xFeb '22Sep '23Apr '25Nov '26
P/E (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianProcess Industries median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/B (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianProcess Industries median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/S (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianProcess Industries median
How to read this

Shaded band: 10th to 90th percentile of the company's own P/E history; dotted line: its median; orange line: sector median (companies with a positive multiple, at least 5 in the sector).

Sector figures are built from today's listed companies, so they exclude companies that are no longer listed.

All terms explained in the glossary →

How Process Industries is valued

Where does it rank among Process Industries peers?

Each cell is the company's percentile rank among its Process Industries peers (non-financial companies) that month.
Darker is better-ranked.
Rows marked ↓ are inverted (lower debt, shorter cash cycle and a lower P/E rank higher).

Where it ranks today

  • ROCE76th▼ 7 pts vs a year ago
  • Op. margin17thflat vs a year ago
  • Revenue growth70th▼ 14 pts vs a year ago
  • EPS growth44th▼ 47 pts vs a year ago
  • Debt/equity ↓75th▲ 10 pts vs a year ago
  • Cash cycle ↓94th▲ 4 pts vs a year ago
  • P/E ↓48th▲ 10 pts vs a year ago
  • 12M momentum12th▼ 46 pts vs a year ago

Rank history

ROCE
Op. margin
Revenue growth
EPS growth
Debt/equity ↓
Cash cycle ↓
P/E ↓
12M momentum
Dec '21Jul '22Jan '23Jul '23Jan '24Jul '24Jan '25Jul '25Jan '26Jul '26Nov '26
Lower rank Higher rank Not enough data

Percentiles use today's listed companies in the sector and need at least 5 peers with a value; grey cells have too few.
ROE is computed from net profit and book value where the source does not report it.

The Process Industries sector page Watch it move against Process Industries in the Observatory

What is the price implying?

~19%annual earnings growth implied by the priceAbove delivered growth

At normalised P/E (five-year average earnings) of 28.4x, a holder earning 12%/yr needs earnings to grow about 19.4%/yr for 10 years, then trade at 15x.

Delivered6.3%/yrEPS, last 8 fiscal years · 3-yr avg to 3-yr avg
Gap+13.1 ptsimplied minus delivered
Rank257thmost demanding of 856

Over time

Implied growth by month (solid) and delivered growth (dashed).

-5%19%43% Feb 2022Nov 2026 -5%19%43% Feb 2022Nov 2026

Change the assumptions

Exit P/E / return11%12%13%
12x21.0%22.1%23.2%
15x18.3%19.4%20.5%
20x15.0%16.0%17.0%

Drag a slider to test other assumptions

Implied: 19.4%/yr

“Implied growth” is what the current price would require under our stated assumptions, not what we expect. How this is calculated and the market-wide lists.

What prices imply across Process Industries The market-wide Expectations lists

Key figures

Share Priceclose 9 Nov
₹166.35
P/E
18.7x
ROCE
18.0%
Market Cap
₹21643 cr
Revenue (TTM)
₹77721 cr
P/S
0.3x
P/B
2.1x
ROE
11.1%
Operating Margin
3.6%
Debt / Equity
0.1x
Promoter Holding
56.9%
12M Momentum
-35.8%

52-week range

₹159.65₹282.90
5% of the way from its 52-week low to its high

Price risk

1Y volatility
28.6%
Beta vs sector
1-year daily
0.83

Balance sheet & cash

Interest cover
operating profit ÷ interest
3.1x
Cash from profit, 3Y
operating cash flow ÷ net profit
2.63x
Share count, 1Y
-0.8%

Are profits backed by cash?

5 of 7checks within range2 near a threshold
Other income reliance18%Near threshold

Other income as a share of pre-tax profit (trailing twelve months): 18.0%. Bands: below 15%, 15% to 35%, above 35%.

Tax rate27%Within range

Median quarterly effective tax rate over about 2.5 years: 27.0%. Bands: 15% to 35%, 5% to 15% or 35% to 50%, outside 5% to 50%.

Cash conversion2.63xWithin range

Operating cash flow divided by net profit over the last three fiscal years: 2.63x (cash from operations ₹6,367 cr, net profit ₹2,419 cr). Bands: 0.8x and above, 0.5x to 0.8x, below 0.5x.

Free cash flow3 of 5 yrsNear threshold

Fiscal years with positive free cash flow in the last 5: 3. Bands: at least 80% of years, 40% to 80%, below 40%.

Receivable days vs history0 daysWithin range

Debtor days are below the median of the previous three fiscal years by 0 days (13 vs 13). Bands: under 15 days, 15 to 45, over 45.

Capital work in progress6% of fixed assetsWithin range

Capital work-in-progress is 6% of fixed assets. Bands: not rising or up to 30%; rising for three years and above 30%; rising and above 60%.

Payable days0 days / 2 yrsWithin range

Days payable changed by 0 over two years. Bands: rise of up to 30 days; more than 30 days.

Tap a check to see how it is measured

How to read this

Each check is a named rule with fixed thresholds, not a score. Annual statements are the latest restated figures, so a past year may differ from what was originally reported.

All terms explained in the glossary →

Who has been buying and selling?

  • Over 2 years, promoters trimmed 30.9 pts; FIIs added 20.5 pts; DIIs added 8.3 pts.
  • The number of shareholders fell from 12.0 lakh to 9.3 lakh (-22%) between Dec 2023 and Jun 2026.

Holdings, Jun '26

How each group changed

GroupDec '23Jun '26Change
Promoters87.9%56.9%-30.9 pts
FIIs0.7%21.1%+20.5 pts
DIIs0.1%8.5%+8.3 pts
Public and others11.3%12.9%+1.6 pts

Number of shareholders

9.3 lakhshareholders-22% since Dec '23
9.3L10.2L11.1L12.0L Dec '23Jun '24Dec '24Jun '25Dec '25Jun '26
Dec '23: 12.0 lakh
Mar '24: 11.7 lakh
Jun '24: 11.6 lakh
Sep '24: 10.8 lakh
Dec '24: 10.6 lakh
Mar '25: 10.6 lakh
Jun '25: 10.3 lakh
Sep '25: 10.1 lakh
Dec '25: 9.7 lakh
Mar '26: 9.4 lakh
Jun '26: 9.3 lakh
9.3L10.2L11.1L12.0L Dec '23Dec '24Dec '25Jun '26
Dec '23: 12.0 lakh
Mar '24: 11.7 lakh
Jun '24: 11.6 lakh
Sep '24: 10.8 lakh
Dec '24: 10.6 lakh
Mar '25: 10.6 lakh
Jun '25: 10.3 lakh
Sep '25: 10.1 lakh
Dec '25: 9.7 lakh
Mar '26: 9.4 lakh
Jun '26: 9.3 lakh

Quarterly shareholding as reported, labelled by the quarter it covers (it becomes visible about two months later).
Shareholder counts are only available for recent quarters.

This quarter's smart-money board

What happened next to similar setups

+5.5%typical 12-month return vs the marketAbove the base rate
  • We found 50 past situations where a non-financial company looked like AWL AGRI BUSINESS LIMITED today on valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, price momentum, size and volatility.
  • Over the following 12 months the middle half of them returned −13% to +29% vs the market, against −7% for all non-financial companies in the same months.
  • The analogs' median sat above that base rate (gap +12.6%, 80% range +4.3% to +22.0%), but the matches cluster in only 6 distinct 12-month windows.

Where the 50 outcomes landed

−100%−50%0%+50%+100%
BAJAJELEC · Aug 2025: −47.0% vs market
ROUTE · Sep 2025: −44.1% vs market
GTPL · May 2025: −41.5% vs market
NCC · Jul 2025: −38.5% vs market
QUESS · Jul 2022: −36.7% vs market
THOMASCOOK · Jun 2025: −34.0% vs market
TEAMLEASE · Aug 2025: −33.2% vs market
VENKEYS · Mar 2023: −27.9% vs market
NILKAMAL · Jan 2024: −26.5% vs market
KIRLOSIND · May 2025: −17.5% vs market
UDS · Sep 2025: −16.5% vs market
DCMSHRIRAM · Jul 2023: −14.3% vs market
RAJESHEXPO · Oct 2020: −13.4% vs market
HITECH · Jul 2025: −10.9% vs market
GANDHAR · Apr 2025: −10.6% vs market
SOTL · Apr 2025: −8.8% vs market
LUXIND · Oct 2025: −7.1% vs market
REDINGTON · Nov 2023: −4.9% vs market
SIS · Jul 2024: −3.8% vs market
PDSL · Jul 2025: −2.2% vs market
APARINDS · Jun 2020: −1.8% vs market
BBTC · Mar 2022: −0.7% vs market
VAIBHAVGBL · Aug 2025: −0.4% vs market
SOMANYCERA · May 2025: +0.8% vs market
BIRLACORPN · Aug 2024: +2.0% vs market
GSPL · Jul 2022: +9.0% vs market
ISGEC · May 2022: +10.2% vs market
ARE&M · Aug 2022: +12.7% vs market
KNRCON · Dec 2023: +14.8% vs market
MRF · Dec 2021: +16.4% vs market
KEC · Apr 2022: +17.1% vs market
INSECTICID · Mar 2024: +17.3% vs market
BANARISUG · Dec 2023: +22.1% vs market
GOODLUCK · Jan 2025: +23.8% vs market
EIDPARRY · Jun 2021: +24.4% vs market
PSPPROJECT · Dec 2024: +26.6% vs market
CHAMBLFERT · Jul 2023: +26.7% vs market
PETRONET · Nov 2023: +29.7% vs market
CEATLTD · Dec 2021: +30.4% vs market
KPIL · Dec 2021: +43.9% vs market
SHANKARA · Jun 2024: +46.7% vs market
RRKABEL · Feb 2025: +48.7% vs market
TVSSRICHAK · Dec 2021: +50.3% vs market
SHRIPISTON · Apr 2022: +65.9% vs market
WABAG · May 2022: +70.2% vs market
MOTHERSON · Aug 2025: +70.9% vs market
APOLLOTYRE · Feb 2022: +71.3% vs market
SURYAROSNI · Nov 2022: +87.7% vs market
GLENMARK · Aug 2022: +88.8% vs market
CIEINDIA · Mar 2022: +115.0% vs market
Similar setups +5.5%All companies −7.1%← worse than the marketbetter than the market →

Each dot is one past situation (hover or tap for details) · Solid dots are the closest matches, listed below · Shaded is the middle half of all companies in the same months · 1 beyond the range shown, drawn at the edge

Similar setups' median
+5.5%
All companies' median
−7.1%
Beat the market
54% vs 42%

50 past situations · 50 companies · 30 months · 2020–2025

The closest matches

CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
RAJESHEXPO
Consumer Durables
Oct 2020 11x11% −32%−39% −13%
TEAMLEASE
Commercial Services
Aug 2025 28x13% −43%−44% −33%
QUESS
Commercial Services
Jul 2022 15x13% −32%−39% −37%
SHANKARA
Retail Trade
Jun 2024 20x17% −6%−24% +47%
NCC
Consumer Durables
Jul 2025 17x22% −39%−39% −39%
Show the other 3 matches
CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
VENKEYS
Process Industries
Mar 2023 12x18% −33%−40% −28%
EIDPARRY
Process Industries
Jun 2021 17x21% +54%−7% +24%
KEC
Industrial Services
Apr 2022 19x21% −1%−25% +17%
How reliable is this?

Matched on P/E, P/S, ROCE, operating margin, debt/equity, interest cover, revenue growth, 12-month momentum, drawdown from 12-month high, size and volatility. Closest on: 12-month momentum, drawdown from 12-month high and P/E. One match per company and at most 7 from any one month.

Independent periods: the matches fall in 6 distinct 12-month windows. Matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, so fewer windows means less evidence.

How this is built

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to AWL AGRI BUSINESS LIMITED. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

Methodology

How historical analogs are built

Data as of 2026-11-09. Outcome pool: Jan 2020 to Oct 2025.

For every company we look at the situation it is in today (valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, 12-month price momentum, drawdown, size and volatility) and find past company-months that looked most like it. We then show what happened to those past situations over the following 12 months, measured against the ApnaFunda All index and against the base rate. It describes history. It does not predict anything.

What is compared

FeatureWeightNon-financialFinancial
P/E1yesyes
P/S1yes—
P/B1—yes
ROCE1yes—
operating margin1yes—
ROE1—yes
debt/equity0.75yes—
interest cover0.5yes—
revenue growth0.75yesyes
12-month momentum1yesyes
drawdown from 12-month high0.75yesyes
size0.75yesyes
volatility0.5yesyes

Weights were set by judgement before any outcome was looked at and are never tuned on results. Loss-making companies (negative P/E or net profit) are only matched with other loss-making companies. Banks, NBFCs and insurers are compared only with each other and use a different feature set. Every feature is converted, month by month, to its rank among companies in the same pool in that month, so a P/E of 30 in a hot market and a P/E of 22 in a cold one can match if both were equally expensive for their time. Only that month's data is used.

How closeness and the sample are defined

Distance is the weighted root-mean-square gap between the standardised features both companies have. A match needs at least 70% of the query's feature weight, a distance of at most 0.9, and 30 matches at minimum to be shown. We keep up to 50 matches with these exclusions: never the company itself, one match per company (its closest month), and at most 7 from any one calendar month so a single market episode cannot dominate.

Base rate

The base rate is the distribution of 12-month returns, relative to the market, of every eligible company-month in the same pool, with each month weighted to match the months the analogs came from. It answers: how did a random company do in these same months? Because matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, we also report the number of distinct 12-month windows behind a result, and a bootstrap that resamples months decides whether the analog median differs from the base rate at all. "Not meaningfully different" is the usual outcome and the page copy is written for it.

Limits you should know

  • One market period. The outcome pool covers 2020–2025 only (70 months), including the 2020 crash and the 2020–21 rally.
  • Survivorship. Only companies listed today are included. Delisted and bankrupt companies are missing, which flatters past outcomes, particularly for distressed-looking setups.
  • Price return only. Dividends are excluded, and the benchmark is an ApnaFunda market-cap-weighted index of the same listed companies, not an official index.
  • Reporting lag. Fundamentals are matched on an assumed 60-day lag after the quarter end, not on real announcement dates.
  • Pools: non-financial: 98,395 company-months from 2019 companies; financial: 5,659 company-months from 108 companies. 2349 companies currently have a result; the rest are suppressed because too few comparable situations exist.

Does it work? A walk-forward check

The walk-forward check has not been run for this build, so skill is shown as not yet measured.

Disclaimer

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to any company shown. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

What else looks like this?

Companies with the most similar financial profile today, regardless of industry.

Consumer Non-Durables
67%similar
EPS growthvolatility
ACCACC
Non-Energy Minerals
65%similar
promoter holdingmarket cap
Non-Energy Minerals
63%similar
revenueP/E
Producer Manufacturing
62%similar
ROCEmarket cap
Producer Manufacturing
62%similar
P/Emarket cap
Process Industries
59%similar
P/EEPS growth
DCM SHRIRAMDCMSHRIRAM
Process Industries
55%similar
market caprevenue
LT FOODSLTFOODS
Process Industries
55%similar
ROCEmarket cap

Similarity is statistical, based on reported metrics; it does not imply similar business quality or future returns.

What changed?

30 events since Jun '24

  1. NovPriceFell 80% from the Apr 2022 peak to the Nov 2026 low.
  2. OctPriceVolume reached 7.4x its 50-day median on 2026-10-28; price -6.2% that day.
  3. SepResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned positive.
  4. SepPriceVolume reached 6.8x its 50-day median on 2026-09-29; price -1.1% that day.
  5. JunDividendStarted paying a dividend (payout 12% of profit).
  6. MarPromoterPromoter holding fell 7.0 pts to 56.9% (largest drop since 2025-12).
  7. MarResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned negative.
  8. MarInstitutionsFII + DII holding rose 17.2 pts over 2 quarters to 30.4%.
Show 22 earlier events
  1. MarPeer rankSlipped to the 3rd quartile of Process Industries on EPS growth (from the 2nd quartile).
  2. MarPriceVolume reached 26.2x its 50-day median on 2026-03-11; price +0.2% that day.
  3. DecPromoterPromoter holding fell 10.4 pts to 63.9% (largest drop since 2025-06).
  4. DecValuationP/E fell below the 10th percentile of its own history to date (28.5x).
  5. DecPeer rankSlipped to the 2nd quartile of Process Industries on EPS growth (from the top quartile).
  6. NovPriceVolume reached 39.1x its 50-day median on 2025-11-21; price -1.0% that day.
  7. SepPriceVolume reached 31.7x its 50-day median on 2025-09-22; price +5.5% that day.
  8. JunPromoterPromoter holding fell 13.5 pts to 74.4%.
  9. JunInstitutionsFII + DII holding rose 12.2 pts over 2 quarters to 13.2%.
  10. JunPeer rankMoved into the top quartile of Process Industries on ROCE (from the 3rd quartile).
  11. MayPriceVolume reached 10.4x its 50-day median on 2025-05-30; price +4.2% that day.
  12. MarResultsRevenue (TTM) reached a new high of ₹58,676 cr.
  13. JanPriceVolume reached 13.9x its 50-day median on 2025-01-13; price -10.0% that day.
  14. DecResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned positive.
  15. DecValuationP/E fell below the 10th percentile of its own history to date (40.7x).
  16. DecPeer rankMoved into the top quartile of Process Industries on EPS growth (from the 2nd quartile).
  17. NovPriceVolume reached 9.5x its 50-day median on 2024-11-21; price -10.0% that day.
  18. SepPeer rankMoved into the 2nd quartile of Process Industries on EPS growth (from the bottom quartile).
  19. AugPriceVolume reached 22.8x its 50-day median on 2024-08-05; price -0.2% that day.
  20. JunValuationP/E crossed above the 90th percentile of its own history to date (291.3x).
  21. JunPeer rankSlipped to the 3rd quartile of Process Industries on ROCE (from the 2nd quartile).
  22. JunPriceVolume reached 7.4x its 50-day median on 2024-06-03; price +3.5% that day.

Events are generated from the data by fixed rules.
The month shown is when the change became visible in the reported figures, assuming a 60-day lag after each quarter end; it is not an announcement date.

Where price and fundamentals disagree, market-wide Rewind the whole market to any month

Monthly history58 months · 2022-02 to 2026-11
MonthP/ERevenue (TTM)ROEROCEDebt / Equity
2026-1118.7x₹77721 cr11.1%18.0%0.1x
2026-1018.4x₹77721 cr11.1%18.0%0.1x
2026-0920.0x₹77721 cr11.1%18.0%0.1x
2026-0824.0x₹74732 cr10.0%18.0%0.1x
2026-0723.6x₹74732 cr10.0%18.0%0.1x
2026-0622.9x₹74732 cr10.0%18.0%0.1x
2026-0526.6x₹71497 cr10.0%21.0%0.2x
2026-0427.2x₹71497 cr10.0%21.0%0.2x
2026-0324.6x₹71497 cr10.0%21.0%0.2x
2026-0222.7x₹69733 cr11.5%21.0%0.2x
2026-0125.7x₹69733 cr11.5%21.0%0.2x
2025-1228.5x₹69733 cr11.5%21.0%0.2x
2025-1129.3x₹66588 cr12.2%21.0%0.2x
2025-1031.1x₹66588 cr12.2%21.0%0.2x
2025-0929.6x₹66588 cr12.2%21.0%0.2x
2025-0826.7x₹63683 cr13.0%21.0%0.2x
2025-0727.8x₹63683 cr13.0%21.0%0.2x
2025-0627.6x₹63683 cr13.0%21.0%0.2x
2025-0530.0x₹58676 cr14.3%10.0%0.3x
2025-0429.1x₹58676 cr14.3%10.0%0.3x
2025-0328.2x₹58676 cr14.3%10.0%0.3x
2025-0232.6x₹54665 cr11.8%10.0%0.3x
2025-0135.3x₹54665 cr11.8%10.0%0.3x
2024-1240.7x₹54665 cr11.8%10.0%0.3x
2024-1175.4x₹52472 cr6.5%10.0%0.3x
2024-1083.2x₹52472 cr6.5%10.0%0.3x
2024-0983.7x₹52472 cr6.5%10.0%0.3x
2024-08317.5x₹51225 cr1.8%10.0%0.3x
2024-07305.4x₹51225 cr1.8%10.0%0.3x
2024-06291.3x₹51225 cr1.8%10.0%0.3x
2024-0579.4x₹58185 cr7.1%15.0%0.3x
2024-0479.8x₹58185 cr7.1%15.0%0.3x
2024-0371.7x₹58185 cr7.1%15.0%0.3x
2024-0285.2x₹58185 cr7.1%15.0%0.3x
2024-0179.3x₹58185 cr7.1%15.0%0.3x
2023-1279.2x₹58185 cr7.1%15.0%0.3x
2023-1176.0x₹58185 cr7.1%15.0%0.3x
2023-1072.9x₹58185 cr7.1%15.0%0.3x
2023-0975.3x₹58185 cr7.1%15.0%0.3x
2023-0880.2x₹58185 cr7.1%15.0%0.3x
2023-0791.9x₹58185 cr7.1%15.0%0.3x
2023-0691.5x₹58185 cr7.1%15.0%0.3x
2023-0570.6x₹54155 cr10.6%19.0%0.4x
2023-0466.6x₹54155 cr10.6%19.0%0.4x
2023-0365.7x₹54155 cr10.6%19.0%0.4x
2023-0258.5x₹54155 cr10.6%19.0%0.4x
2023-0175.5x₹54155 cr10.6%19.0%0.4x
2022-1299.9x₹54155 cr10.6%19.0%0.4x
2022-11102.0x₹54155 cr10.6%19.0%0.4x
2022-10108.8x₹54155 cr10.6%19.0%0.4x
2022-09122.2x₹54155 cr10.6%19.0%0.4x
2022-08112.0x₹54155 cr10.6%19.0%0.4x
2022-07—————
2022-06—————
2022-05112.4x₹37090 cr22.1%21.0%0.9x
2022-04122.5x₹37090 cr22.1%21.0%0.9x
2022-0381.1x₹37090 cr22.1%21.0%0.9x
2022-0259.6x₹37090 cr22.1%21.0%0.9x

Methodology and data notes

Methodology

Methodology and data notes

All figures come from public exchange prices and screener.in financial statements. Quarterly and annual results are shown from 60 days after the period end, so a month never uses a result before it would plausibly have been published. Statements are the latest versions, which may include later restatements.

Sector medians, percentiles and indices use today's listed companies in the sector (survivorship bias). Prices are adjusted for splits and bonus issues; around a corporate action the fundamentals may lag the price by up to a month, and affected sections are hidden.

The return decomposition uses price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count. The reverse DCF uses a fixed 12% cost of equity, a 10-year horizon and a 15x terminal P/E, and is an illustration only. Events, flags and twins follow fixed rules and thresholds described next to each section.

Feedback